DOCSLIB.ORG

Design Specification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design Specification CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Bradford Scholars University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ANIMATRONIC MODEL Christopher Thomas PEEL submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Informatics University of Bradford 2008 Abstract; C Peel: An Investigation into the Construction of an Animatronic Model This thesis investigates the development of an animatronic robot with the objective of showing how modern animatronic models created as special effects have roots in models created during the scientific and mechanical revolution of the 17th and 18th centuries. It is noted that animatronic models that are available today have not been described in any great detail and most are covered by industrial secrecy. This project utilises technologies developed during the latter part of the 20th century and into the beginning of the 21st century to create the design of the animatronic robot. The objective of the project is to bring effective designs for animatronic robots into the public domain. The project will investigate a large variety of different mechanisms and apply them to various functioning parts of the model, with the design and method of each of these functions discussed. From this, one main part of the project, the jaw, will receive the focus of construction. Once the construction is complete this will be evaluated against what improvements and changes could be made for future iterations, with a revised design produced based on what has been learned. Keywords Allosaurus Animatronic Autonomous Control System Dinosaur head Museum Exhibit PIC16F84A Robotics Special Effects Visitor Attraction 1 Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction/History .................................................................................... 4 History of Animatronics – Introduction ................................................................. 5 Mechanical Automata: Precursor to Animatronics ............................................... 5 20th Century Electromechanical Automata .......................................................... 10 Defining “Animatronics” .................................................................................... 12 Film vs. Museum Animatronics............................................................................ 14 Summary .............................................................................................................. 16 Chapter 2 - Model Design ............................................................................................ 18 Design Constraints............................................................................................... 18 Material Selection ................................................................................................ 19 Actuation – Electro vs. Fluid Power .................................................................... 21 Modular Design Approach .................................................................................. 23 Tongue ................................................................................................................. 23 Jaw ....................................................................................................................... 25 Cheeks .................................................................................................................. 26 Eyebrows.............................................................................................................. 27 Eyelids.................................................................................................................. 27 Eyes ...................................................................................................................... 28 Nostrils ................................................................................................................. 28 Internal Controller ................................................................................................ 29 Assembly.............................................................................................................. 30 Design Brief ......................................................................................................... 31 Design Issues ....................................................................................................... 31 Jaw Actuation & Motor Positioning .................................................................... 32 Point of Rotation .................................................................................................. 34 Potential Points of Failure................................................................................... 36 Final Mechanism ................................................................................................. 36 Chapter 3 - Construction .............................................................................................. 39 Construction Techniques ..................................................................................... 39 Papier-mâché test ................................................................................................. 39 Constructing the frame ......................................................................................... 40 Control subsystem ................................................................................................ 40 Improved Control Subsystem .............................................................................. 41 Cam Construction ................................................................................................ 42 Controller Design ................................................................................................ 44 Program Design ................................................................................................... 47 Chapter 4 - Review of Project Objectives.................................................................... 49 Chapter 5 - Revised Design ......................................................................................... 53 Mechanical Redesign ........................................................................................... 53 Redesign Limitations ............................................................................................ 54 Balance of Issues.................................................................................................. 55 Controller Redesign ............................................................................................. 56 Sound Implementation ......................................................................................... 56 2 Chapter 6 - Conclusions ............................................................................................... 59 Starting out........................................................................................................... 59 Construction ......................................................................................................... 60 Points of Issue ...................................................................................................... 61 Animatronics at Home ......................................................................................... 63 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 63 References .................................................................................................................... 65 Appendix A – Mathematics used in this project .......................................................... 68 Appendix B – Program code for the controller ............................................................ 70 Appendix C – Non Research Issues ............................................................................. 72 Appendix D – List of materials & parts used .............................................................. 74 Appendix E – Quick Reference Tables ........................................................................ 75 Table of Figures: Fig 1-1 – The Flute Player ............................................................................. 7 Fig 1-2 – The musician built by Jaquet-Droz ................................................. 8 Fig 1-3 – Images of the T-Rex built by Kokoro ........................................... 17 Fig 2-1 – Images of Allosaurus skulls .......................................................... 19 Fig 2-2 – The main jaw and tongue mechanisms ......................................... 25 Fig 2-3 – The cheek mechanism ................................................................... 26 Fig 2-4 – The nostril mechanism .................................................................. 29 Fig 2-5 – Top side and rear views of the jaw mechanism ............................ 38 Fig 3-1 – Actual size image of the eccentric cam ......................................... 43 Fig 3-2 – The cam/motor/sensor piece ......................................................... 44 Fig 3-3 – Circuit diagram for the controller ................................................. 45 Fig 3-4 – Circuit schematic ........................................................................... 47 Fig
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fun Facts and Activities
    Robo Info: Fun Facts and Activities By: J. Jill Rogers & M. Anthony Lewis, PhD Robo Info: Robot Activities and Fun Facts By: J. Jill Rogers & M. Anthony Lewis, PhD. Dedication To those young people who dare to dream about the all possibilities that our future holds. Special Thanks to: Lauren Buttran and Jason Coon for naming this book Ms. Patti Murphy’s and Ms. Debra Landsaw’s 6th grade classes for providing feedback Liudmila Yafremava for her advice and expertise i Iguana Robotics, Inc. PO Box 625 Urbana, IL 61803-0625 www.iguana-robotics.com Copyright 2004 J. Jill Rogers Acknowledgments This book was funded by a research Experience for Teachers (RET) grant from the National Science Foundation. Technical expertise was provided by the research scientists at Iguana Robotics, Inc. Urbana, Illinois. This book’s intended use is strictly for educational purposes. The author would like to thank the following for the use of images. Every care has been taken to trace copyright holders. However, if there have been unintentional omissions or failure to trace copyright holders, we apologize and will, if informed, endeavor to make corrections in future editions. Key: b= bottom m=middle t=top *=new page Photographs: Cover-Iguana Robotics, Inc. technical drawings 2003 t&m; http://robot.kaist.ac.kr/~songsk/robot/robot.html b* i- Iguana Robotics, Inc. technical drawings 2003m* p1- http://www.history.rochester.edu/steam/hero/ *p2- Encyclopedia Mythica t *p3- Museum of Art Neuchatel t* p5- (c) 1999-2001 EagleRidge Technologies, Inc. b* p9- Copyright 1999 Renato M.E. Sabbatini http://www.epub.org.br/cm/n09/historia/greywalter_i.htm t ; http://www.ar2.com/ar2pages/uni1961.htm *p10- http://robot.kaist.ac.kr/~songsk/robot/robot.html /*p11- http://robot.kaist.ac.kr/~songsk/robot/robot.html; Sojourner, http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/ *p12- Sony Aibo, The Sony Corporation of America, 550 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022 t; Honda Asimo, Copyright, 2003 Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • AI, Robots, and Swarms: Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies
    AI, Robots, and Swarms Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies Andrew Ilachinski January 2017 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the Defense Technical Information Center at www.dtic.mil or contact CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Photography Credits: http://www.darpa.mil/DDM_Gallery/Small_Gremlins_Web.jpg; http://4810-presscdn-0-38.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ Robotics.jpg; http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-edia/image/upload/18kxb5jw3e01ujpg.jpg Approved by: January 2017 Dr. David A. Broyles Special Activities and Innovation Operations Evaluation Group Copyright © 2017 CNA Abstract The military is on the cusp of a major technological revolution, in which warfare is conducted by unmanned and increasingly autonomous weapon systems. However, unlike the last “sea change,” during the Cold War, when advanced technologies were developed primarily by the Department of Defense (DoD), the key technology enablers today are being developed mostly in the commercial world. This study looks at the state-of-the-art of AI, machine-learning, and robot technologies, and their potential future military implications for autonomous (and semi-autonomous) weapon systems. While no one can predict how AI will evolve or predict its impact on the development of military autonomous systems, it is possible to anticipate many of the conceptual, technical, and operational challenges that DoD will face as it increasingly turns to AI-based technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Employing Animatronics in Teaching Engineering Design
    AC 2011-190: EMPLOYING ANIMATRONICS IN TEACHING ENGINEER- ING DESIGN Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University ARIF SIRINTERLIKCI received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Tech- nical University, Turkey, and a Ph.D. degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the Ohio State University. Currently, he is a Professor of Engineering as well as Co-Head of Research and Outreach Cen- ter at Robert Morris University in Moon Township, Pennsylvania. His teaching and research areas include rapid prototyping and reverse engineering, robotics and automation, bioengineering, and entertainment technology. He has been active in ASEE and SME, serving as an officer of the ASEE Manufacturing Division and SME Bioengineering Tech Group. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Employing Animatronics in Teaching Engineering Design Introduction This paper presents a cross-disciplinary methodology in teaching engineering design, especially product design. The author has utilized this animatronics-based methodology at college and secondary school levels for about a decade. The objective was to engage students in practical and meaningful projects. The result is an active learning environment that is also creative. The methodology was also employed for student recruitment and retention reasons. The effort has spanned two universities and included a senior capstone project1, an honors course2, multiple summer work-shops and camps3,4,5,6,7 as well as an introduction to engineering course. The curriculum encompasses the basics of engineering and product design, and development as well as team work. Students follow the following content sequence and relevant activities through concept development, computer-aided design (CAD), materials and fabrication, rapid prototyping and manufacturing, mechanical design and mechanisms, controls and programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Robot Control and Programming: Class Notes Dr
    NAVARRA UNIVERSITY UPPER ENGINEERING SCHOOL San Sebastian´ Robot Control and Programming: Class notes Dr. Emilio Jose´ Sanchez´ Tapia August, 2010 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra 987‐84‐8081‐293‐1 ii Viaje a ’Agra de Cimientos’ Era yo todav´ıa un estudiante de doctorado cuando cayo´ en mis manos una tesis de la cual me llamo´ especialmente la atencion´ su cap´ıtulo de agradecimientos. Bueno, realmente la tesis no contaba con un cap´ıtulo de ’agradecimientos’ sino mas´ bien con un cap´ıtulo alternativo titulado ’viaje a Agra de Cimientos’. En dicho capitulo, el ahora ya doctor redacto´ un pequeno˜ cuento epico´ inventado por el´ mismo. Esta pequena˜ historia relataba las aventuras de un caballero, al mas´ puro estilo ’Tolkiano’, que cabalgaba en busca de un pueblo recondito.´ Ya os podeis´ imaginar que dicho caballero, no era otro sino el´ mismo, y que su viaje era mas´ bien una odisea en la cual tuvo que superar mil y una pruebas hasta conseguir su objetivo, llegar a Agra de Cimientos (terminar su tesis). Solo´ deciros que para cada una de esas pruebas tuvo la suerte de encontrar a una mano amiga que le ayudara. En mi caso, no voy a presentarte una tesis, sino los apuntes de la asignatura ”Robot Control and Programming´´ que se imparte en ingles.´ Aunque yo no tengo tanta imaginacion´ como la de aquel doctorando para poder contaros una historia, s´ı que he tenido la suerte de encontrar a muchas personas que me han ayudado en mi viaje hacia ’Agra de Cimientos’. Y eso es, amigo lector, al abrir estas notas de clase vas a ser testigo del final de un viaje que he realizado de la mano de mucha gente que de alguna forma u otra han contribuido en su mejora.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Baudrillard the Automation of the Robot (From Simulations)
    Jean Baudrillard The Automation of the Robot (from Simulations) A whole world separates these two artificial beings. One is a theatriclil counteIfeit, a mechanical and clocklike man; technique submits CII- tirely to analogy and to the effect of semblance. The other is dominal('d by the technical principle; the machine overrides aU, and with III(' machine equivalence comes too. The automaton plays the parI of courtier and good company; it participates in the pre-Revolutionar' French theatrical and social games. The robot, on the other hand, IIH his name indicates, is a worker: the theater is over and done with, II", reign of mechanical man commences. The automaton is the analogy 01 man and remains his interlocutor (they play chess together!). TII(\ machine is man's equivalent and annexes him to itself in the unity or ilH operational process. This is the difference between a simulacrum of Ih(, first order and one of the second. We shouldn't make any mistakes on this matter for reasons of "figurative" resemblance between robot and automaton. The latter iH an interrogation upon nature, the mystery of the existence or nonexiH- tence of the soul, the dilemma of appearance and being. It is like God: what's underneath it all, what's inside, what's in the back of it? 0111 the counteIfeit men allow these problems to be posed. The enlin' metaphysics of man as protagonist of the natural theater of the creatioll is incarnated in the automaton, before disappearing with the Revolll tion. And the automaton has no other destiny than to be ceaselcHHI compared to living man-so as to be more natural than him, of which he is the ideal figure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spider: Anaylsis of an Automaton
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Proceedings from the Document Academy University of Akron Press Managed December 2017 The pideS r: Anaylsis of an Automaton Susannah N. Munson Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/docam Part of the History Commons, and the Museum Studies Commons Recommended Citation Munson, Susannah N. (2017) "The pS ider: Anaylsis of an Automaton," Proceedings from the Document Academy: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/4/2/1 Available at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/docam/vol4/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Akron Press Managed at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings from the Document Academy by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Munson: The Spider: Analysis of an Automaton In 2017, the Spider automaton sits in the Robots exhibition at the Science Museum in London, surrounded by dozens of other automata. This little clockwork spider is small and relatively unassuming but it, like other physical objects, is a document of an inconceivable amount of information – about itself, its history and associations, and its role in broader social and cultural contexts (Gorichanaz and Latham, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Moral and Ethical Questions for Robotics Public Policy Daniel Howlader1
    Moral and ethical questions for robotics public policy Daniel Howlader1 1. George Mason University, School of Public Policy, 3351 Fairfax Dr., Arlington VA, 22201, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract The roles of robotics, computers, and artifi cial intelligences in daily life are continuously expanding. Yet there is little discussion of ethical or moral ramifi cations of long-term development of robots and 1) their interactions with humans and 2) the status and regard contingent within these interactions– and even less discussion of such issues in public policy. A focus on artifi cial intelligence with respect to differing levels of robotic moral agency is used to examine the existing robotic policies in example countries, most of which are based loosely upon Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws. This essay posits insuffi ciency of current robotic policies – and offers some suggestions as to why the Three Laws are not appropriate or suffi cient to inform or derive public policy. Key words: robotics, artifi cial intelligence, roboethics, public policy, moral agency Introduction Roles for robots Robots, robotics, computers, and artifi cial intelligence (AI) Robotics and robotic-type machinery are widely used in are becoming an evermore important and largely un- countless manufacturing industries all over the globe, and avoidable part of everyday life for large segments of the robotics in general have become a part of sea exploration, developed world’s population. At present, these daily as well as in hospitals (1). Siciliano and Khatib present the interactions are now largely mundane, have been accepted current use of robotics, which include robots “in factories and even welcomed by many, and do not raise practical, and schools,” (1) as well as “fi ghting fi res, making goods moral or ethical questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolic Computation Using Cellular Automata-Based Hyperdimensional Computing
    LETTER Communicated by Richard Rohwer Symbolic Computation Using Cellular Automata-Based Hyperdimensional Computing Ozgur Yilmaz ozguryilmazresearch.net Turgut Ozal University, Department of Computer Engineering, Ankara 06010, Turkey This letter introduces a novel framework of reservoir computing that is capable of both connectionist machine intelligence and symbolic com- putation. A cellular automaton is used as the reservoir of dynamical systems. Input is randomly projected onto the initial conditions of au- tomaton cells, and nonlinear computation is performed on the input via application of a rule in the automaton for a period of time. The evolu- tion of the automaton creates a space-time volume of the automaton state space, and it is used as the reservoir. The proposed framework is shown to be capable of long-term memory, and it requires orders of magnitude less computation compared to echo state networks. As the focus of the letter, we suggest that binary reservoir feature vectors can be combined using Boolean operations as in hyperdimensional computing, paving a direct way for concept building and symbolic processing. To demonstrate the capability of the proposed system, we make analogies directly on image data by asking, What is the automobile of air? 1 Introduction Many real-life problems in artificial intelligence require the system to re- member previous input. Recurrent neural networks (RNN) are powerful tools of machine learning with memory. For this reason, they have be- come one of the top choices for modeling dynamical systems. In this letter, we propose a novel recurrent computation framework that is analogous to echo state networks (ESN) (see Figure 1b) but with significantly lower computational complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Comest on Robotics Ethics
    SHS/YES/COMEST-10/17/2 REV. Paris, 14 September 2017 Original: English REPORT OF COMEST ON ROBOTICS ETHICS Within the framework of its work programme for 2016-2017, COMEST decided to address the topic of robotics ethics building on its previous reflection on ethical issues related to modern robotics, as well as the ethics of nanotechnologies and converging technologies. At the 9th (Ordinary) Session of COMEST in September 2015, the Commission established a Working Group to develop an initial reflection on this topic. The COMEST Working Group met in Paris in May 2016 to define the structure and content of a preliminary draft report, which was discussed during the 9th Extraordinary Session of COMEST in September 2016. At that session, the content of the preliminary draft report was further refined and expanded, and the Working Group continued its work through email exchanges. The COMEST Working Group then met in Quebec in March 2017 to further develop its text. A revised text in the form of a draft report was submitted to COMEST and the IBC in June 2017 for comments. The draft report was then revised based on the comments received. The final draft of the report was further discussed and revised during the 10th (Ordinary) Session of COMEST, and was adopted by the Commission on 14 September 2017. This document does not pretend to be exhaustive and does not necessarily represent the views of the Member States of UNESCO. – 2 – REPORT OF COMEST ON ROBOTICS ETHICS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION II. WHAT IS A ROBOT? II.1. The complexity of defining a robot II.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Robots in Health and Social Care: a Complementary Technology to Home Care and Telehealthcare?
    Robotics 2013, 3, 1-21; doi:10.3390/robotics3010001 OPEN ACCESS robotics ISSN 2218-6581 www.mdpi.com/journal/robotics Review Robots in Health and Social Care: A Complementary Technology to Home Care and Telehealthcare? Torbjørn S. Dahl 1 and Maged N. Kamel Boulos 2,* 1 Centre for Robotics and Neural Systems, Plymouth University, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Faculty of Health, Plymouth University, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-1752-586-530; Fax: +44-7053-487-881. Received: 1 November 2013; in revised form: 17 December 2013 / Accepted: 18 December 2013 / Published: 30 December 2013 Abstract: This article offers a brief overview of most current and potential uses and applications of robotics in health/care and social care, whether commercially ready and available on the market or still at the various stages of research and prototyping. We provide carefully hand-picked examples and pointers to on-going research for each set of identified robotics applications and then discuss the main ingredients for the success of these applications, as well as the main issues surrounding their adoption for everyday use, including sustainability in non-technical environments, patient/user safety and acceptance, ethical considerations such as patient/user privacy, and cost effectiveness. We examine how robotics could (partially) fill in some of the identified gaps in current telehealthcare and home care/self-care provisions. The article concludes with a brief glimpse at a couple of emerging developments and promising applications in the field (soft robots and robots for disaster response) that are expected to play important roles in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Asimov's Automatons
    Dr. Asimov’s Automatons Take on a Life of their Own Twenty years after his death, author Isaac Asimov’s robot fiction offers a blueprint to our robotic future...and the problems we could face by Alan S. Brown HIS PAST April, the University of Miami School These became the Three Laws. Today, they are the starting of Law held We Robot, the first-ever legal and point for any serious conversation about how humans and policy issues conference about robots. The name robots will behave around one another. of the conference, which brought together lawyers, As the mere fact of lawyers discussing robot law shows, engineers, and technologists, played on the title the issue is no longer theoretical. If robots are not yet of the most famous book intelligent, they are increasingly t ever written about robots, autonomous in how they carry out I, Robot, by Isaac Asimov. tasks. At the most basic level, every The point was underscored by day millions of robotic Roombas de- Laurie Silvers, president of Holly- cide how to navigate tables, chairs, wood Media Corp., which sponsored sofas, toys, and even pets as they the event. In 1991, Silvers founded vacuum homes. SyFy, a cable channel that specializ- At a more sophisticated level, es in science fiction. Within moments, autonomous robots help select in- she too had dropped Asimov’s name. ventory in warehouses, move and Silvers turned to Asimov for ad- position products in factories, and vice before launching SyFy. It was a care for patients in hospitals. South natural choice. Asimov was one of the Korea is testing robotic jailers.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Animatronics
    Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Vol-2, Issue-9, 2016 ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in Review on Animatronics Chandrashekhar Kalnad B.E E.X.T.C, D.K.T.E Abstract— Animatronics is one of the sub branch of robotics . It includes the functionality of robots and real life animation .It is used to emulate humans or animals[1][2] . It is used in movies for special effects and theme parks . Animatronic figures are often powered by pneumatics, hydraulics, or by electrical means, and can be implemented using both computer control and human control . Motion actuators are often used to imitate muscle movements and create realistic motions in limbs. Figures are covered with body shells and flexible skins made of hard and soft plastic materials, and finished with details like colors, hair and feathers and other components to make the figure more realistic. Figure 1. Cuckoo clock I. HISTORY The making of Animatronics began by the clock makers . Many years ago there were mechnical clocks with animated characters . It moved according to the time of the clock and also created sounds .These clock were large .The Germans created affordable clocks popularly known as the cuckoo clocks[figure 1].It consisted of a mechanical bird which popped out on specific times such as an hour after . The modern era of animatronics was started by Walt Disney. Disney saw animatronics Figure 2. Tiki room as a novelty that would attract visitors to his World's Today the most advanced animatronics are Fair displays and later his movies and theme parks.
    [Show full text]