DOCSLIB.ORG

CDFW Unpublished Data)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CDFW Unpublished Data) State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife REPORT TO THE FISH AND GAME COMMISSION FIVE-YEAR SPECIES REVIEW OF SIERRA NEVADA BIGHORN SHEEP (Ovis canadensis sierrae) March 2021 Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Ram, photo by Josh Schulgen Charlton H. Bonham, Director California Department of Fish and Wildlife TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 4 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 5 A. Five-Year Species Review ............................................................................................ 5 B. Listing and Review History ............................................................................................ 6 C. Notifications and Information Received ......................................................................... 6 III. BIOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 6 A. Taxonomic and Physical Description ............................................................................. 6 B. Life History and Ecology ............................................................................................... 7 C. Habitat Necessary for Species Survival ........................................................................ 8 i. Vegetation Communities and Foraging Habitat .................................................... 8 ii. Geology and Soils ................................................................................................ 9 iii. Climate and Hydrology ......................................................................................... 9 iv. Reproductive Habitat ...........................................................................................10 v. Wintering Habitat/Hibernacula/Other Seasonal Habitats ......................................10 IV. DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE .................................................................................11 A. Range and Distribution .................................................................................................11 V. THREATS AND SURVIVAL FACTORS ............................................................................17 A. Factors Affecting Ability to Survive and Reproduce ......................................................17 i. Limited Distribution and Small Populations ..........................................................17 ii. Predation .............................................................................................................18 iii. Disease ...............................................................................................................20 iv. Habitat Modification or Destruction ......................................................................22 v. Climate Change...................................................................................................22 vi. Human Recreation ..............................................................................................22 vii. Overexploitation ..................................................................................................23 viii. Competition ..................................................................................................23 B. Degree and Immediacy of Threats ...............................................................................23 i. Limited Distribution and Small Populations ..........................................................23 ii. Predation .............................................................................................................24 iii. Disease ...............................................................................................................27 iv. Habitat Modification or Destruction ......................................................................28 v. Climate Change...................................................................................................28 vi. Human Recreation ..............................................................................................29 vii. Overexploitation ..................................................................................................29 viii. Competition ..................................................................................................29 2 VI. MANAGEMENT AND RECOVERY ...................................................................................29 A. Impact of Existing Management Efforts ........................................................................29 i. Translocations .....................................................................................................30 ii. Predation Management .......................................................................................31 iii. Disease Monitoring and Management .................................................................36 iv. Habitat Protection and Enhancement ..................................................................39 v. Human Recreation Research and Outreach ........................................................40 vi. Competition Mitigation .........................................................................................40 B. Recommendations for Management Activities and Other Recommendations for Recovery of the Species ..............................................................................................40 i. Monitoring and Translocations .............................................................................40 ii. Captive Breeding .................................................................................................41 iii. Predation Management .......................................................................................41 iv. Disease Monitoring and Prevention .....................................................................43 v. Habitat Protection and Enhancement ..................................................................44 vi. Human Recreation ..............................................................................................44 vii. Competition Mitigation .........................................................................................44 VII. RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMISSION ..................................................................45 VIII. Sources ............................................................................................................................45 A. Literature Cited ............................................................................................................45 IX. LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................54 X. LIST OF TABLES ..............................................................................................................54 XI. List of Appendices ...........................................................................................................54 3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae; hereafter Sierra bighorn) were listed as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act in 1971 and uplisted to endangered in 1999. The subspecies has been listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act since 2000. Pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2077, subdivision (a), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has prepared this Five-Year Species Review to evaluate whether conditions that led to the original listing of Sierra bighorn are still present. This species review is based on the best scientific information currently available to the Department regarding each of the components listed under section 2072.3 of the Fish and Game Code, and Section 670.1, subdivisions (d) and (i)(1)(A), of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. In addition, this document contains a review of the identification of habitat that may be essential to the continued existence of the species, and the Department’s recommendations for management activities and other recommendations for recovery of the species (Fish & G. Code, § 2077, subd. (a)). After reviewing the best available scientific information, the Department determined the following: Sierra bighorn, a distinct subspecies of bighorn sheep, occur in 14 relatively isolated subpopulations throughout the Sierra Nevada. Sierra bighorn select for visually open, snow-free habitat in proximity to steep, rugged terrain that may facilitate escape from predators. Historically, subpopulations of Sierra bighorn likely interacted as a functional metapopulation, but the distribution and connectivity of inhabited areas are much reduced from their historical extent. Population trajectories are largely driven by adult female survival, which is variable. The Sierra bighorn population has increased since its listing as a federally endangered species from 122 to 525 individuals, including 266 adult and yearling females. While the subspecies currently meets the distribution requirements for downlisting specified in the Recovery Plan for the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2007), abundance goals have not yet been met. The primary threats impeding recovery of Sierra bighorn are small population sizes that create a fragile distribution, predation by mountain lions, and disease transmission from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Motorized Travel Management
    Inyo National Forest Travel Management EIS – August 2009 Chapter 3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3.1 Introduction This Chapter summarizes the physical, biological, social, and economic environments that are affected by the Proposed Action and alternatives and the effects (or consequences) that would result from implementation of those alternatives. The effects disclosed in this Chapter provide the scientific and analytical basis for comparison of the benefits and risks of the alternatives. The Affected Environment Section under each resource topic describes the existing, or baseline, condition against which environmental effects of the alternatives were evaluated and from which progress toward the desired condition can be measured. Environmental consequences form the scientific and analytical basis for comparison of alternatives through compliance with standards set forth in the 1988 Inyo National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (also referred to as the Forest Plan or LRMP), as amended, and monitoring required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and National Forest Management Act of 1976. The environmental consequences discussion centers on direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the alternatives, including recommended mitigation measures. Effects can be neutral, beneficial, or adverse. These terms are defined as follows: • Direct effects are caused by the action and occur at the same place and time as the action. • Indirect effects are caused by the action and are later in time, or further removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. • Cumulative effects are those that result from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions.
    [Show full text]
  • MEETING MINUTES BOARD of SUPERVISORS, COUNTY of MONO STATE of CALIFORNIA Regular Meeting September 10, 2019 9:02 AM Meeting Call
    MEETING MINUTES September 10, 2019 Page 1 of 11 MEETING MINUTES BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF MONO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Regular Meetings: The First, Second, and Third Tuesday of each month. Location of meeting is specified just below. MEETING LOCATION Board Chambers, 2nd Fl., County Courthouse, 278 Main St., Bridgeport, CA 93517 Regular Meeting September 10, 2019 9:02 AM Meeting called to Order by Chair Peters. Supervisors Present: Corless, Gardner, Kreitz, Peters, and Stump. Supervisors Absent: None. The Mono County Board of Supervisors stream most of their meetings live on the internet and archives them afterward. To search for a meeting from June 2, 2015 forward, please go to the following link: http://www.monocounty.ca.gov/meetings. Pledge of Allegiance led by CAO Steve Barwick. 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE BOARD No one spoke. 2. RECOGNITIONS - NONE 3. COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE CAO Report regarding Board Assignments Receive brief oral report by County Administrative Officer (CAO) regarding work activities. Steve Barwick: • Introduced himself; yesterday was his first day. Everything going well; yesterday was very productive. 4. DEPARTMENT/COMMISSION REPORTS Nate Greenberg (IT Director): • Gave update on SCE power shutoff. • Board would like this brought back later. Jason Canger (County Counsel): • Department of Water/Resources - Owens Valley Groundwater Basin: everything still in limbo. MEETING MINUTES September 10, 2019 Page 2 of 11 • This week is the beginning of increased flows in Owens River Gorge – public access to Gorge is restricted for at least a week. Sheriff Braun: • Busy weekend; many visitors. • Annual Clampers event, no issues. • June Lake Jam Fest very well attended and very popular.
    [Show full text]
  • The CRA Wildfire Brief for July 19, 2018
    Report ID #: 2018-0719-0139 Weekly Wildfire Brief Provide Feedback on this Report Notice: The information in this report is subject to change and may have evolved since the compiling of this report. BLUE Text = Newly added information and information that has changed since the last wildfire brief. GRAY Text = Infomration where nothing new has been posted since the last wildfire brief, unable to reverify the information as still being current. Inside this Brief: Summary Pg 1 - 2 Current Air Quality Map Pg 6 Weather Information Pg 3 Wildfire Snapshot Pages Pg 7 - 19 Red Flag Watches & Warnings Pg 4 Resource Spotlight Pg 20 Significant Fire Potential Maps Pg 5 Additional Resources Pg 21 (Previous Brief Published 7/12/18) Wildfire Summary - July 19, 2018 For reference: 1 sq mile = 640 acres ; 1 football field = approx 1.32 acres Acres % Structures Structures Burned Contained Evacuations Page Fire Threatened Destroyed [Change] [Change] Butte County Stoney Fire * 962 98% None None None 7 Inyo County 2,888 42% Georges Fire None None None 8 [+5] [+0%] Madera County Lions Fire 4,064 100% None None listed None 9 (FINAL) [+0] [+100%] Mariposa County Ferguson Fire * 21,541 7% YES 216 None 10-11 Modoc County Eagle Fire * 2,100 90% None listed None listed None listed 12 Riverside County Skyline Fire * 250 5% YES Yes None listed 13 San Benito County Idria Fire 116 100% None None listed None listed 14 (FINAL) [+0] [+50%] Panoche Fire 278 100% None None listed None listed 15 (FINAL) [+0] [+30%] San Bernardino County 1,348 29% Valley Fire None listed None
    [Show full text]
  • The CRA Weekly Wildfire Brief for October 25, 2018
    Report ID #: 2018-1030-2120 Weekly Wildfire Brief Provide Feedback on this Report Notice: The information in this report is subject to change and may have evolved since the compiling of this report. BLUE Text = Newly added information and information that has changed since the last wildfire brief. GRAY Text = Infomration where nothing new has been posted since the last wildfire brief, unable to reverify the information as still being current. Inside this Brief: Summary Pg 1 Santa Ana Wildfire Threat Index Pg 5 Weather Information Pg 2 Wildfire Snapshot Pages Pg 6 Red Flag Watches & Warnings Pg 3 Downloadable Map Files Pg 7 Air Quality Maps Pg 3 USGS Debris Flow Hazard Maps Pg 8 Significant Fire Potential Maps Pg 4 Reference Links Pg 9 (Previous Brief Published 10/18/18) Wildfire Summary - October 25, 2018 For reference: 1 sq mile = 640 acres ; 1 football field = approx 1.32 acres Acres % Structures Structures Fire Burned Contained Evacuations Page Threatened Destroyed [Change] [Change] Tulare County Alder Fire 702 3% Area Closure None listed None listed 6 * Newly added fire Legend for National Interagency Fire Center MODIS Fire Activity Maps Where available MODIS maps are included for the fires in this report. The MODIS maps display the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fire detection data, which is collected via satellite. Thermal data, for the northern hemisphere, is collected twice a day, at 12:00 AM EST and 2:00 PM EST. Color Coding Legend: Red Circles: fire activity within the last 0-12 hours Orange Circles: fire activity within the last 12-24 hours Yellow Circles: Fire activity within the last 24-48 hours Burn area and perimeter lines of current fires are usually shown in yellow, though occasionally for some fires they are green.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Reports
    Report ID #: 2018-0726-0224 Weekly Wildfire Brief Provide Feedback on this Report Notice: The information in this report is subject to change and may have evolved since the compiling of this report. BLUE Text = Newly added information and information that has changed since the last wildfire brief. GRAY Text = Infomration where nothing new has been posted since the last wildfire brief, unable to reverify the information as still being current. Inside this Brief: Summary Pg 1 - 2 Current Air Quality Map Pg 6 Weather Information Pg 3 Wildfire Snapshot Pages Pg 7 - 25 Red Flag Watches & Warnings Pg 4 Additional Resources Pg 26 Significant Fire Potential Maps Pg 5 (Previous Brief Published 7/19/18) Wildfire Summary - July 26, 2018 For reference: 1 sq mile = 640 acres ; 1 football field = approx 1.32 acres Acres % Structures Structures Burned Contained Evacuations Page Fire Threatened Destroyed [Change] [Change] Butte County Stoney Fire 100% 962 None None None 7 (FINAL) [+2%] Contra Costa County Marsh Fire * 247 75% YES 13 4 8 Del Norte & Siskiyou Counties Natchez Fire * 2,738 Not listed None None listed None listed 9 Inyo County 2,883 70% Georges Fire None None None 10 [-5] [+28%] Lassen County Roxie Fire * 167 70% None None None 11 Madera County 4,267 Lions Fire 92% None None listed None 12 [+203] Mariposa County 44,223 27% Ferguson Fire [+22,682] [+20%] YES 5,236 1 13-15 Modoc County Eagle Fire 2,100 95% None listed None listed None listed 16 (FINAL) [+0] [+5%] Continued on Next Page -- 1 -- Wildfire Summary (continued) For reference: 1
    [Show full text]
  • WUI Program...1
    Page 1 Ferguson Fire - Brush Engine 1 Crew INSIDE THIS QUARTER: WUI Program................... 1 Calls & Response Stats.... 2 Mutual Aid Assignments. 2 This year’s WUI program was a success with a total clearance of 235 Prevention Unit Stats...... 3 acres. The crew performed fuels reduction around the residences, tribal buildings, and road system on the reservation. Defensible space Traffic Accidents.............. 4 was maintained up to 100 feet around the homes and tribal buildings. Fireline Medic.................. 4 The program runs each year from June through September with a Training & Testing........... 5 crew between 7 to 10 individuals, including a crew boss and assistant Misc.................................. 6 crew boss. The Bureau of Indian Affairs funded Email the Battalion Chief’s this year’s WUI program by way of [email protected] mkennedy@pechanga -nsn.gov grant at a total of $109,252.00. [email protected] Or Call Pechanga Fire Department at (951)770-6001 Page 2 Pechanga Fire Department Quarterly Report Pechanga Fire Department personnel actively participated in this year’s wildland fires, CALLS both operational and administratively. The following is a breakdown of fire personnel that participated in mutual aid assignments this quarter. EMS Calls 273 Fires 10 . FC Chris Burch: Dispatched to the Klamathon Fire in Siskiyou County on July 5th, and Public Assistance 2 the Carr Fire in Shasta County on July 25th as Planning Section Chief, working closely Good Intent 27 with the Incident Commander to plan and organize the tactics, strategy and False Alarms 3 resources needed to suppress the fire. Hazardous Condition 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • California Wildfires 11.1.19 Update
    California Wildfires 11.1.19 Update Risk Services Division 1 November, 2019 Legal Notice All consulting services performed by HUB are advisory in nature. All resultant reports are based upon conditions and practices observed by HUB and information supplied by the client. Any such reports may not identify or contemplate all unsafe conditions and practices; others may exist. HUB does not imply, guarantee or warrant the safety of any of the client’s properties or operations or that the client or any such properties or operations are in compliance with all federal, state or local laws, codes, statutes, ordinances, standards or recommendations. All decisions in connection with the implementation, if any, of any of HUB’s advice or recommendations shall be the sole responsibility of, and made by, the client.The advice and recommendations submitted in this plan constitute neither a warranty of future results nor an assurance against risk. This material represents the best judgment of HUB and is based on information obtained from both open and closed sources. HUB Risk Services Sensitive 1 November 2019 California Wildfires For Official Use Only 12:00 PT California Wildfires Status at (12:00 PT) 1 November 2019 . Kincade Fire, Sonoma County: 77,758 acres, 68% contained . Maria Fire, Ventura County: 8730 acres, 0% contained . Easy Fire, Los Angeles County: 1860 acres, 80% contained . Getty Fire, Los Angeles County: 745 acres, 66% contained . 46 Fire, Riverside County: 300acres, 70% contained . Hillside Fire: San Bernardino County: 200 acres, 50% contained . Pacific Gas & Electric reports power restored to “essentially all” residences and businesses that lost power in effort to prevent additional wildfires Sensitive Page 2 of 15 For Official Use Only HUB Risk Services Sensitive 1 November 2019 California Wildfires For Official Use Only 12:00 PT Summary As of 12:00 PT (20:00 UTC), thirteen fires are active across the state of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Missing Person" Incidents Since 2013
    "Missing Person" Incidents Since 2013 Involvement Incident# IncidentTime ParkAlpha Summary CaseStatus On February 20, 2012 at approximately 2009hours, Supervisory Ranger Hnat received a report from dispatch in reference to overdue fisherman (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) . On February 21, 2012, Ranger Austin and I initiated a Search and Rescue to include the use of NPS fixed wing plane. Subsequently the missing persons were located by BLM fire crew, and were transported safely to Mesquite, NV. By: Missing person NP12001104 02/20/2012 20:09 MST LAKE Ranger S. Neel Closed - Found/rescued REF LM2012030142 - LAKE - ***JUVENILE SENSITIVE INFORMATION*** - Lake Mead Interagency Dispatch Center received a call from a parent stating that her juvenile son had not returned home and was possibly in the Boulder Beach Campground. Ranger Knierman and I located the individual at campsite #67 at 2341 hours. The juvenile was reunited with his Missing person NP12001373 03/04/2012 22:37 MST LAKE mother shortly thereafter. All units were clear at 0014 hours. Closed - Incident only GOLD BRANCH, LOST MALE/FOUND NO INJURIES, FORWARD, 12- Missing person; Visitor NP12001490 03/03/2012 19:30 MST CHAT 0273 Closed - Incident only Missing person; Victim NP12001537 03/09/2012 13:20 MST PORE Search, Estero Trail area, Closed - Found/rescued Page 1 of 170 "Missing Person" Incidents Since 2013 Involvement Incident# IncidentTime ParkAlpha Summary CaseStatus On March 11th 2012 at approximately 1730 hours Ranger Ruff and I were dispatched to find two people who were missing from a larger group of people near Placer Cove. Ruff and I arrived at approximately 1820 hours and found the group who contacted dispatch.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Mclean: from the CAL FIRE Information Center, I'm Scott Mclean with the CAL FIRE Report for Monday, September 9, 2019. L
    Scott McLean: From the CAL FIRE Information Center, I’m Scott McLean with the CAL FIRE Report for Monday, September 9, 2019. Last week, fire activity kicked into high gear starting with another round of dry lightning across much of the north early in the week, and continuing into the weekend with some high winds and very low humidity. In all, 361 new wildfires sparked in the last week in California, of which 239 were in CAL FIRE’s jurisdiction. You can see that our yearly acreage stats took a significant jump as well, with 47,847 acres now burned across CAL FIRE’s jurisdiction this year, for a grand total of 128,750 acres across all jurisdictions. Switching over to our statewide fire map, you can see that as of today, firefighters are currently battling 18 significant wildfires from San Diego County all the way north to Siskiyou County. A good portion of those were sparked by that lightning that I mentioned earlier, especially those up north and in the higher elevations. Let’s zoom in for a closer look at a few of the larger significant fires. We’ll start in Tehama County with the Red Bank Fire. That fire started on Thursday afternoon in a very remote location West of Red Bluff, making firefighter access very difficult. With more on the Red Bank Fire, Deputy Ops Chief Jarrod Clinkenbeard prepared this video with the latest. Jarrod Clinkenbeard: Hello, I’m Jarrod Clinkenbeard, Deputy Operations, CAL FIRE Incident Management Team 5. Today’s situational update for the Red Bank Incident for Monday, November 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Final General Management Plan and Comprehensive River Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement
    Final National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior General Management Plan and Sequoia and Kings Canyon Comprehensive River Management Plan / National Parks Middle and South Forks of the Environmental Impact Statement Kings River and North Fork of the Kern River Tulare and Fresno Counties California Volume 2: The Affected Environment / Environmental Consequences / Appendixes / Glossary / Selected Bibliography Preparers and Consultants / Index [This page intentionally left blank.] 216 SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS and MIDDLE AND SOUTH FORKS OF THE KINGS RIVER AND NORTH FORK OF THE KERN RIVER Tulare and Fresno Counties • California FINAL GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 2: The Affected Environment / Environmental Consequences / Appendixes / Glossary / Selected Bibliography / Preparers and Consultants / Index United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service [This page intentionally left blank.] 216 Contents: Volume 2 THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Ecosystem Stressors ................................................................................................................................ 3 Loss of Pre-Euro-American Fire Regimes ...................................................................................... 3 Introduced Species........................................................................................................................... 3 Air Pollution ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Wildfires 10.29.19 Update
    California Wildfires 10.29.19 Update Risk Services Division 29 October, 2019 Legal Notice All consulting services performed by HUB are advisory in nature. All resultant reports are based upon conditions and practices observed by HUB and information supplied by the client. Any such reports may not identify or contemplate all unsafe conditions and practices; others may exist. HUB does not imply, guarantee or warrant the safety of any of the client’s properties or operations or that the client or any such properties or operations are in compliance with all federal, state or local laws, codes, statutes, ordinances, standards or recommendations. All decisions in connection with the implementation, if any, of any of HUB’s advice or recommendations shall be the sole responsibility of, and made by, the client.The advice and recommendations submitted in this plan constitute neither a warranty of future results nor an assurance against risk. This material represents the best judgment of HUB and is based on information obtained from both open and closed sources. HUB Risk Services Sensitive 29 October 2019 California Wildfires For Official Use Only 12:00 PT California Wildfires Status at (12:00 PT) 29 October, 2019 Summary As of 12:00 PT (20:00 UTC), twelve fires are active across the state of California. The two fires of greatest concern are the Getty and Kincade fires. Getty Fire The Getty Fire began in the early morning of October 28, 2019 and is burning near UCLA, the Getty Museum, several schools, and a nursing home in and around the Los Angeles communities of Bel Air, Brentwood, Mandeville, Crestwood Hills, and Westgate (combined pop 20k).
    [Show full text]
  • California Resiliency Alliance Weekly Wildfire Brief for July 11, 2018
    Report ID #: 2018-0713-0000 Weekly Wildfire Brief Provide Feedback on this Report Notice: The information in this report is subject to change and may have evolved since the compiling of this report. BLUE Text = Newly added information and information that has changed since the last wildfire brief. GRAY Text = Infomration where nothing new has been posted since the last wildfire brief, unable to reverify the information as still being current. Inside this Brief: Summary Pg 1 Current Air Quality Map Pg 6 State Fire Map Pg 2 Wildfire Snapshot Pages Pg 7 - 16 Weather Information Pg 3 Additional Resources Pg 17 Red Flag Watches & Warnings Pg 4 Significant Fire Potential Maps Pg 5 (Previous Brief Published 7/5/18) Wildfire Summary - July 12, 2018 For reference: 1 sq mile = 640 acres ; 1 football field = approx 1.32 acres Acres % Structures Structures Burned Contained Evacuations Page Fire Threatened Destroyed [Change] [Change] Inyo County Georges Fire * 2,883 42% Lifted None listed None 7 Lake County Pawnee Fire 15,185 100% None None 22 8 (FINAL) [+185] [+8%] Madera County 4,064 90% Lions Fire None listed None listed None 9 [+0] [+17%] San Benito County Idria Fire * 116 50% None Listed None listed None listed 10 Panoche Fire * 278 70% None listed None listed None listed 11 San Bernardino County Valley Fire * 1,348 29% None listed None None 12 San Diego County West Fire * 504 100% Lifted None 65 13 (FINAL) Siskiyou County 36,500 75% Klamathon Fire YES 315 82 14 [+31,500] [+75%] 215 100% Petersburg Fire None None 2 15 [+0] [+25%] Yolo & Napa
    [Show full text]