DOCSLIB.ORG

Genesee & Wyoming Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Genesee & Wyoming Canada Maritime Lumber Bureau- May, 2018 Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1 Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1899 The original Genesee & Wyoming Railroad- 14 miles in upstate NY serving one customer that we still serve today Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 2 By the way, the Genesee and Wyoming Railroad doesn’t operate in either Genesee or Wyoming counties! Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 3 The Retsof Salt Mine in Livingston County, New York Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 4 G&W Board of Directors 1899 Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 5 Centralized (G&W Corporate) Support Rochester, NY 140 people Darien, CT – Accounting & Finance 15 people – Human Resources – Corporate Head Office – Information Technology Jacksonville, FL 154 people – Engineering – Compliance & Safety – Industrial Development – Commercial & Real Estate – Customer Service – Mechanical – Car Leasing & – Purchasing Fleet Management – Training Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 6 Respected by Our Shareholders Consistent Long-Term Growth $2,200 ($ millions) ($ Initial Public Offering $3 ≈ Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 7 Overview • NYSE: Listed as GWR with ~$4.5B market capitalization • Railroads: 122 railroads with ~16,000 track miles (80% North America; 20% Australia/Europe) • People: ~8,000 • Customers: 3,000 • Equipment: 1,350 locomotives • Carloads: ~3.4 million annually Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 8 G&W Operating Income by Segment U.K./Europe ~5% Australia ~10% North America ~85% Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 9 North America Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 10 Revenue Diversity 2017 Total G&W Freight Revenue by Commodity Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 11 Extension of Class I Rail System: 2016: 1.6MM G&W Carloads Interchanged 82,000 383,000 152,000 270,000 50,000 290,000 370,000 Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 12 Significant Port Railroad Franchise G&W subsidiaries serve more than 40 major ports on three continents. Scope ranges from North American and Australian ports served by our railroads, to providing “last mile” rail services within Europe’s busiest container port; from municipal port authorities that choose to lease their railroads to the company under long-term contracts, to Freightliner’s complete “dock-to-door” service transporting maritime containers from major U.K. ports through to end delivery Ports served include: • Adelaide, South Australia • New London, Connecticut • Amsterdam, Netherlands • Olympia, Washington • Antwerp, Belgium • Panama City, Florida • Baton Rouge, Louisiana • Port Augusta, South Australia • Bremerhaven, Germany • Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia • Bremerton, Washington • Port Lincoln, South Australia • Brunswick, Georgia • Port Pirie, South Australia • Cannock, United Kingdom • Port Westward, Oregon • Cincinnati, Ohio • Portsmouth, Virginia • Corpus Christi, Texas • Port Lavaca-Point Comfort, Texas • Darwin, Australia • Providence, Rhode Island • Davisville, Rhode Island • Quebec, Quebec • Felixstowe, United Kingdom • Rostock, Germany • Fernandina, Florida • Rotterdam, Netherlands • Galveston, Texas • Savannah, Georgia (2) • Goderich, Ontario • Southampton, United Kingdom • Grays Harbor, Washington • St. Joe, Florida • Hamburg, Germany • Sydney, Nova Scotia • Hamilton, Ontario • Thevenard, South Australia • Hueneme, California • Tilbury, United Kingdom • London Gateway, United Kingdom • Trois-Rivieres, Quebec • Lubeck, Germany • Whyalla, South Australia • Mare Island, California • Wilhelmshaven, Germany • Mobile, Alabama • Wilmington, North Carolina • New Haven, Connecticut Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 13 G&W Railroads Industry-Leading Safety Performance 5 Injury Frequency Rate per 200,000 Hours 4 Short Lines 3 2 Class I 1 0 * G&W results include April 2015 acquisition of Freightliner Group Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 14 Leadership in Safety 2.5 9,000 Injury Frequency Rate 8,000 per 200,000 Hours 2.0 7,000 Employees 6,000 1.5 5,000 4,000 1.0 Injury Rate Injury Frequency 3,000 0.5 2,000 Employees RailAmerica Freightliner Pentalver 1,000 acquisition acquisition acquisition 0.0 0 Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 15 Accident Pyramid Attack the base! Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 16 G&W Commitment to Long-Term Infrastructure More than $1.5 billion gross capital investment in since 2010 Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 17 Progress Towards “Most Respected” Industry-Leading Customer Satisfaction 10 9 8.0 = Our Goal 8 7 Trucking Other Railroads 6 5 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 18 Genesee & Wyoming Canada Inc. Genesee Wyoming Canada (GWCI) is a division of Genesee & Wyoming Inc. GWCI operates twelve rail lines: . Cape Breton & Central Nova Scotia Railway (CBNS) . Québec-Gatineau Railway (QGRY) . Chemin de fer St-Laurent & Atlantique (SLQ) . St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad (SLR) . Ottawa Valley Railway (OVR) . Huron Central Railway (HCRY) . Southern Ontario Railway (SOR) . Goderich-Exeter Railway (GEXR) . Western Labrador Rail Services . Chemin de fer Kérail . Knob Lake & Timmins Railway . Services Ferroviaires de l’Estuaire Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 19 Industry Safety Performance Injury Frequency Rate for 200 000 hours worked GWI, CN & CP Dec 2017; others Nov 2017 3.14 *200 000 worked hours = 100 employees for 1 year 2.46 1.91 1.83 1.67 1.29 1.21 1.16 1.08 0.83 0.79 0.60 FRA Group 2 FRA Group 3 KCS CN CP NS CSX Class I Avg BNSF G&W UP GWCI Consolidated Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 20 GWCI Carloads per Railroad 2017 HCRY CBNS 9% 7% GEXR 12% QGRY 27% RLK 6% RLHH 20% SLQ 12% SLR 7% Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 21 GWCI – Markets 210000 180000 150000 120000 Carloads 46,709 90000 43,312 39,626 35,063 35,038 36,881 60000 30000 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Agricultural & Food Petroleum & Chemicals Forest Products Metals & Minerals Others Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 22 GWCI interchange with the two Canadian Class 1 RR GWCI Total Carloads 2016 GWCI Total Carloads 2017 CP CP 36% 25% LOCAL LOCAL 10% CN 9% CN 66% 54% Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 23 Genesee & Wyoming Canada Inc. now… . Open door to NAFTA Market 140,000+ carloads/yr. Fleet of 1685 cars to support customers business. More than 3,000 car spots of available storage capacity. Annual Capital investment of $20M to $30M in railway infrastructure. Financial/Operational partnership with customers. Operation partnership with the mining industry. Genesee & Wyoming Canada Inc. projects… . Intermodal terminal in Quebec City. Conversion of all GWCI RR to 286K. Continuous geographical expansion. Genesee & Wyoming Canada inc. 24 Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 25 .
Recommended publications
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida

    2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida

    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
  • One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA

    One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA

    One Rail Australia Submission to ESCOSA One Rail Australia welcomes the invitation from ESCOSA to respond to the South Australian Rail Access Regime Review Issues Paper (February 2020). The review is timely given recent developments in the rail industry in South Australia, which are set out in detail below. Overall, our position is: • There is no compelling case to change the current regime significantly. • Whilst volumes on intrastate main lines continue to reduce, this has been driven by increased competition from road transport, rather than deficiencies in the access regime. • Other than lower volumes, there has been no significant change in the operation of the market since 2015, such that ESCOSA’s conclusions at the time supporting the continuation of the existing regime should have altered; • The current regime is a cost-effective way to provide protection to both access seekers and access providers in South Australia and provides certainty for all parties through the negotiation and arbitration framework; • ESCOSA reflects a fit-for-purpose regulator for the South Australian rail market given its size relative to the national regulated market which allows for efficient communication and resolution of issues; and • Changing to a national regime would be a costly process during transition and would raise regulatory compliance costs of all parties in the long run. It would also generate risks around the process of transition and there may be opportunity for other parties, such as national transport carriers, to exert market power. The rest of this submission sets out some information about One Rail Australia, an update on the South Australian freight transport industry, an overview of our perceptions of strengths and weaknesses of the current regime.
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report

    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report

    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
  • Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor 70% Ownership Interest in Transrail 2 on February 3, 2012, in Docket No

    Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor 70% Ownership Interest in Transrail 2 on February 3, 2012, in Docket No

    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Notices 17121 Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, The MG Principals will retain the Class RailAmerica et al. states that: (1) W&C 2012. B Common Units of TransRail, thereby does not connect with any of Jeffrey D. Wiese, retaining a 30% interest in TransRail, RailAmerica’s subsidiary railroads; (2) Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety. though they will not retain control or the proposed transaction is not part of [FR Doc. 2012–7080 Filed 3–22–12; 8:45 am] the power to control W&C. a series of anticipated transactions to BILLING CODE 4910–60–P Fortress’ noncarrier affiliate, RR connect W&C and any of RailAmerica’s Acquisition, currently owns about 60% subsidiary railroads; and (3) the of the publicly traded shares and proposed transaction does not involve a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION controls the noncarrier RailAmerica, Class I rail carrier. The proposed which directly controls the noncarrier transaction is therefore exempt from the Surface Transportation Board Palm Beach, which directly controls the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. [Docket No. FD 35605] noncarrier RTC. 11323 pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2). RailAmerica states that it controls the Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board RailAmerica, Inc., Palm Beach Rail following Class III rail carriers: (1) may not use its exemption authority to Holding, Inc., RailAmerica Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC; (2) relieve a rail carrier of its statutory Transportation Corp., RailTex, Inc., Arizona & California Railroad Company; obligation to protect the interests of its Fortress Investment Group, LLC, and (3) Bauxite & Northern Railway employees.
  • CP's North American Rail

    CP's North American Rail

    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
  • Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service

    Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service

    Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 13, 2014 To: Algoma Central Railway (ACR) Passenger Service Working Group c/o Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive – Level Three Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 From: BDO Canada LLP 747 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5N7 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................. 2 Revenue and Ridership ................................................................................ 2 Stakeholders ............................................................................................. 3 Socio-Economic Impact ................................................................................ 4 Economic Impact ........................................................................................... 4 Social Impact ............................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................
  • Stronger Ties: a Shared Commitment to Railway Safety

    Stronger Ties: a Shared Commitment to Railway Safety

    STRONGER TIES: A S H A R E D C O M M I T M E N T TO RAILWAY SAFETY Review of the Railway Safety Act November 2007 Published by Railway Safety Act Review Secretariat Ottawa, Canada K1A 0N5 This report is available at: www.tc.gc.ca/tcss/RSA_Review-Examen_LSF Funding for this publication was provided by Transport Canada. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department. ISBN 978-0-662-05408-5 Catalogue No. T33-16/2008 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Transport, 2007 This material may be freely reproduced for non-commercial purposes provided that the source is acknowledged. Photo Credits: Chapters 1-10: Transport Canada; Appendix B: CP Images TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................1 1.1 Rationale for the 2006 Railway Safety Act Review . .2 1.2 Scope . 2 1.3 Process ....................................................................................3 1.3.1 Stakeholder Consultations . .4 1.3.2 Research . 6 1.3.3 Development of Recommendations .......................................6 1.4 Key Challenges for the Railway Industry and the Regulator.................7 1.5 A Word of Thanks .................................................................... 10 2. STATE OF RAIL SAFETY IN CANADA ...................................11 2.1 Accidents 1989-2006 ................................................................. 12 2.2 Categories of Accidents . 13 2.2.1 Main Track Accidents...................................................... 14 2.2.2 Non-Main Track Accidents ............................................... 15 2.2.3 Crossing and Trespasser Accidents . 15 2.2.4 Transportation of Dangerous Goods Accidents and Incidents . 17 2.3 Normalizing Accidents . 18 2.4 Comparing Rail Safety in Canada and the U.S.
  • Affiliate Rewards Eligible Companies

    Affiliate Rewards Eligible Companies

    Affiliate Rewards Eligible Companies Program ID's: 2012MY 2013MY 2014MY Designated Corporate Customer 28HCR 28HDR 28HER Fleet Company 28HCH 28HDH 28HEH Supplier Company 28HCJ 28HDJ 28HEJ Company Name Type 3 Point Machine SUPPLIER 3-D POLYMERS SUPPLIER 3-Dimensional Services SUPPLIER 3M Employee Transportation & Travel FLEET 84 Lumber Company DCC A & R Security Services, Inc. FLEET A B & W INC SUPPLIER A D E SUPPLIER A G Manufacturing SUPPLIER A G Simpson Automotive Inc SUPPLIER A I M CORPORATION SUPPLIER A M G INDUSTRIES INC SUPPLIER A T KEARNEYINC SUPPLIER A&D Technology Inc SUPPLIER A&E Television Networks DCC A. Raymond Tinnerman Automotive Inc SUPPLIER A. Schulman Inc SUPPLIER A.J. Rose Manufacturing SUPPLIER A.M Community Credit Union DCC A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES SUPPLIER AAA East Central DCC AAA National SUPPLIER AAA Ohio Auto Club DCC AARELL COMPANY SUPPLIER ABA OF AMERICA INC SUPPLIER ABB, Inc. FLEET Abbott Ball Co SUPPLIER ABBOTT BALL COMPANY THE SUPPLIER Abbott Labs FLEET Abbott, Nicholson, Quilter, Esshaki & Youngblood P DCC Abby Farm Supply, Inc DCC ABC GROUP-CANADA SUPPLIER ABC Widgit Company SUPPLIER Abednego Environmental Services SUPPLIER Abercrombie & Fitch FLEET Affiliate Rewards Eligible Companies Program ID's: 2012MY 2013MY 2014MY Designated Corporate Customer 28HCR 28HDR 28HER Fleet Company 28HCH 28HDH 28HEH Supplier Company 28HCJ 28HDJ 28HEJ ABERNATHY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIER ABF Freight System Inc SUPPLIER ABM Industries, Inc. FLEET AboveNet FLEET ABP Induction SUPPLIER ABRASIVE DIAMOND TOOL COMPANY SUPPLIER Abraxis Bioscience Inc. FLEET ABSO-CLEAN INDUSTRIES INC SUPPLIER ACCENTURE SUPPLIER Access Fund SUPPLIER Acciona Energy North America Corporation FLEET Accor North America FLEET Accretive Solutions SUPPLIER Accu-Die & Mold Inc SUPPLIER Accumetric, LLC SUPPLIER ACCUM-MATIC SYSTEMS INC SUPPLIER ACCURATE MACHINE AND TOOL CORP SUPPLIER ACCURATE ROLL ENGINEERING CORP SUPPLIER Accurate Technologies Inc SUPPLIER Accuride Corporation SUPPLIER Ace Hardware Corporation FLEET ACE PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIER ACG Direct Inc.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 163/Wednesday, August 22, 2012

    Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 163/Wednesday, August 22, 2012

    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22, 2012 / Notices 50761 Administration, RPD–3, Federal Affected Public: State and local ways to enhance the quality, utility, and Railroad Administration, 1200 New governments, government sponsored clarity of the information to be Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 20, authorities and corporations, railroads. collected; and ways to minimize the Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) Abstract: The Railroad Rehabilitation burden of the collections of information 493–6353), or Ms. Kimberly Toone, and Repair Grant Program (Catalog of on respondents, including the use of Office of Information Technology, RAD– Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) automated collection techniques or 20, Federal Railroad Administration, Program Number 20.314), was originally other forms of information technology. 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 35, supported with up to $20,000,000 of A comment to OMB is best assured of Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) Federal funds provided to FRA as part having its full effect if OMB receives it 493–6132). (These telephone numbers of the Consolidated Security, Disaster within 30 days of publication of this are not toll-free.). Assistance, and Continuing notice in the Federal Register. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110– Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 329, September 30, 2008). On May 27, Issued in Washington, DC, on August 15, (PRA), Public Law 104–13, Section 2, 2009, FRA selected 12 projects, totaling 2012. 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised $15 million under this program. On Michael Logue, at 44 U.S.C.
  • Financial Highlights

    Financial Highlights

    Financial Highlights (in thousands, except per share data) Years Ended December 31 1999 1998 Income Statement Data Operating revenues $175,586 $147,472 Operating income $22,368 $19,568 Net income $12,533 $11,434 Diluted earnings per common share $2.76 $2.19 Weighted average number of shares of common stock–diluted 4,540 5,229 Balance sheet data as of period end Total assets $301,940 $216,760 Total debt $108,376 $65,690 Stockholders’ equity $81,829 $74,537 GWI is a holding company whose subsidiaries own and operate regional freight railroads and provide related rail services. The Company generates revenues primarily from the movement of freight over track owned or operated by its railroads. The Company also generates nonfreight revenues primarily by providing freight car switching and rail-related services to industrial companies with extensive railroad facilities within their complexes. Revenues, Operating and Net Income Revenue Sources By Business Segment $180 by 1999 revenues $160 North American Railroad (68.9%) $30 $140 Industrial Switching (6.5%) $120 $20 Australian Railroad (24.6%) $100 $15 $80 (in millions) $60 $10 (in millions) Income Revenues $40 $5 $20 $0 $0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 (in thousands) Revenues $53,387 $77,795 $103,643 $147,472 $175,586 Operating Income 6,572 13,994 16,443 19,568 22,368 Net Income 1,657 5,905 7,998 11,434 12,533 Letter to the Shareholders Our financial performance in 1999, our centennial year, was the best in the Company’s history. Income after taxes increased 9.7 percent to $12.5 million from $11.4 million in 1998.
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2012 Annual Report

    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2012 Annual Report

    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2012 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc. (G&W) owns and operates short line and regional freight railroads in the United States, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Belgium. In addition, G&W operates the 1,400-mile Tarcoola to Darwin rail line, which links the Port of Darwin with the Australian interstate rail network in South Australia. Operations currently include 111 railroads organized in 11 regions, with nearly 15,000 miles of owned and leased track, 4,600 employees and over 2,000 customers. We provide rail service at 35 ports in North America, Australia and Europe and perform contract coal loading and railcar switching for industrial customers. Australia Region North Sea NETHERLANDS Rotterdam Maas River Betuweroute to Germany Kijfhoek Rail Yard Rail Feeding Headquarters Europe Rotterdam Rail Feeding, B.V. Region Belgium Rail Feeding BVBA BELGIUM Antwerp Port Operations On the Cover: A newly re-branded New England Central “mother-slug” locomotive set Shunting Contracts transports wood chips to fuel a power plant in Burlington, Vermont. Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Pacific Region Mountain West Region Central Region Rail Link Region North American Operations Canada Region Northeast Region Midwest Region Ohio Valley Region Rail Link Region G&W Railroads Port Operations Industrial Switching Southern Contract Coal Loading Region Dashed line indicates Trackage Rights; gray line indicates Out of Service. www.gwrr.com Financial Highlights (In thousands, except per share amounts) Years Ended December 31 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Income Statement Data Operating revenues $874,916 $829,096 $630,195 $544,866 $601,984 Income from operations 190,322 191,779 130,410 99,322 115,931 Income from continuing operations, net of tax 52,551 119,493 78,669 60,075 72,975 Net income available to common stockholders 48,058 119,484 81,260 61,327 72,231 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
  • How Railways Can Be Part of Canada's Climate Change Solution

    How Railways Can Be Part of Canada's Climate Change Solution

    How railways can be part of Canada’s climate change solution A submission by the Railway Association of Canada July 1, 2016 (originally submitted on May 31) Version 2 – update Version 2 – update Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada Table of Contents 1 Canada’s railway sector .......................................................................................... 4 Climate change policy in the transportation sector ................................................................... 5 2 How railways can be part of Canada’s climate change solution ......................... 6 3 Policy considerations for the future ...................................................................... 9 4 Railway emissions management programs and performance .......................... 10 5 Our recommendations .......................................................................................... 12 Modal shift is a mitigation opportunity for Canada .................................................................. 12 Revenues collected from carbon pricing strategies should be reinvested into rail ................... 12 The Government needs to support clean technology and innovation in the rail sector ............ 13 6 Concluding remarks .............................................................................................. 13 Appendix A: List of RAC Members 2 Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada Acronym Table AMT Agence métropolitaine de transport CO2e CO2 equivalent COP Conference of Parties CDP Carbon Disclosure