The Wolf Theiss Guide To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Wolf Theiss Guide To THE WOLF THEISS GUIDE TO: Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities in Central, Eastern & Southeastern Europe 2018 Edition THE WOLF THEISS GUIDE TO: Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities in Central, Eastern & Southeastern Europe This second edition of The Wolf Theiss Guide To: Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities in Central, Eastern & Southeastern Europe is intended as a practical guide to the general principles and features of the basic legislation and procedures in the countries included in the publication. While every effort has been made to ensure that the country guides were accurate when finalised, they should be used only as a general reference guide and should not be relied upon as definitive for planning or making definitive legal decisions. In these rapidly changing legal markets, the laws and regulations are frequently revised, either by amended legislation or by administrative interpretation. Status of information: Current as of 1 January 2018 Conception, design, and editing: WOLF THEISS Rechtsanwälte GmbH & Co KG, Attorneys-at-Law Schubertring 6, 1010 Vienna, Austria www.wolftheiss.com © 2018 WOLF THEISS Rechtsanwälte GmbH & Co KG. All Rights Reserved. Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities in Central, Eastern & Southeastern Europe CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 07 AN INTERNAL ENERGY MARKET FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION AND BEYOND 13 COUNTRY CHAPTERS 16 ALBANIA 16 AUSTRIA 34 BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA 46 BULGARIA 66 CROATIA 90 CZECH REPUBLIC 104 HUNGARY 118 POLAND 138 ROMANIA 158 SERBIA 182 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 204 SLOVENIA 218 UKRAINE 232 OUR OFFICES 249 1 Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities in Central, Eastern & Southeastern Europe FOREWORD FOREWORD Wolf Theiss is pleased to publish the 2nd edition of The Wolf Theiss Guide To: Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities in Central, Eastern & Southeastern Europe. In the past decade, this part of Europe has seen increasing interest in participation in the wholesale energy markets. Our energy team has handled numerous licensing procedures throughout the region both in the electricity and the natural gas market. The most challenging aspect is often helping our clients manoeuvre through the labyrinth of regulations, hence our decision to publish this Wolf Theiss Guide To: Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities in Central, Eastern & Southeastern Europe. It is intended as a practical guide to the principal regulatory features of the licensing of wholesale activities in 13 jurisdictions covered by Wolf Theiss. In the first part of the guide, we present an executive summary of the regulatory licensing framework applicable in each of the 13 jurisdictions covered. The second chapter of the guide contains an outline of the current status of the internal energy market in the European Union and highlights the regulatory “patchwork” regarding access to the physical wholesale energy markets in our region. The regulatory framework applicable in each jurisdiction is described in more detail in the country chapters. To facilitate the reference to the relevant sections, all the country chapters follow a uniform structure and start with a detailed table of contents including the relevant page numbers. When they are used, defined terms apply to the specific country chapter only. The information contained in this Wolf Theiss guide was correct as of 1 January 2018. While every effort has been made to ensure that the information was accurate when finalised, the guide should be used only as a general reference guide and should not be relied upon as definitive for planning concrete transactions. In these rapidly changing legal markets, the laws and regulations are frequently revised, either by legislative amendments or by administrative interpretations. Our thanks go to all of the teams at Wolf Theiss who have enabled us to produce this guide. Zoltán Faludi March 2018 Partner, Co-Head of Projects (Infrastructure and Energy) Practice Group Wolf Theiss 3 Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities WOLF THEISS & REGION Warsaw POLAND Kyiv Prague CZECH UKRAINE REPUBLIC SLOVAK REPUBLIC Bratislava Vienna AUSTRIA Budapest HUNGARY Ljubljana ROMANIA SLOVENIA Zagreb CROATIA Bucharest BOSNIA & Belgrade HERZEGOVINA SERBIA Sarajevo BULGARIA Sofia Tirana ALBANIA EUROPE WOLF THEISS REGION EUROPE 5 Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. LICENSING OF ELECTRICITY WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES ARE WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES SUBJECT TO DO YOU NEED AN LICENSING MAY A FOREIGN ENTITY DIRECTLY ADDITIONAL LICENCE (NOTIFICA- APPLY FOR AND HOLD A WHOLESALE TO SUPPLY INDUSTRIAL TION)? LICENCE? END-CUSTOMERS? ALBANIA Yes. No. Foreign entities are required to establish No. a Local Corporation in order to apply for a Wholesale Licence. AUSTRIA No. N/A. A foreign entity may directly engage in N/A. electricity Wholesale Activities in Austria provided that it has a domestic process agent. BOSNIA & Yes. No. Foreign entities are required to establish No. HERZE- a Local Corporation in order to apply for the GOVINA Wholesale Licences. BULGARIA Yes. A foreign entity incorporated in an EU Member No. State may directly apply for and hold a Whole- sale Licence, if it meets the mandatory require- ments for the performance of Wholesale Activities. Foreign entities incorporated in other countries cannot directly obtain a Whole- sale Licence, they need to establish a Local Corporation for this purpose. CROATIA Yes. No. A Local Corporation or a natural person Yes. registered as an individual trader may apply for a Wholesale Licence. However, if a foreign entity is set up in the EU or the European Energy Community (including Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Monte- negro, and Serbia), it may apply for and hold a Wholesale Licence directly, provided that it has a branch office registered in Croatia and meets the financial, technical and staffing requirements set out by the Ordinance on permits for performance of energy related activities. CZECH Yes. No. Foreign companies are required to have No. REPUBLIC a local presence either through the establish- ment of a new Local Corporation/acquisition of an existing Local Corporation or a Branch Office to be established in the Czech Republic. 7 ARE WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES SUBJECT TO DO YOU NEED AN LICENSING MAY A FOREIGN ENTITY DIRECTLY ADDITIONAL LICENCE (NOTIFICA- APPLY FOR AND HOLD A WHOLESALE TO SUPPLY INDUSTRIAL TION)? LICENCE? END-CUSTOMERS? HUNGARY Yes. Foreign entities incorporated in an EU/EEA Yes. An Additional Licence can Member State may directly apply for and hold be directly obtained by a foreign a Wholesale Licence, provided that they law- entity incorporated in an EU/EEA fully and effectively pursue electricity Member State provided that it trading in their country of incorporation. lawfully and effectively pur- Foreign entities incorporated in countries sues electricity trading in its other than EU/EEA Member States cannot country of incorporation. directly apply for a Wholesale Licence in Foreign entities incorporated in Hungary. They may only obtain an Additional countries other than EU/EEA Licence, provided that they establish a Local Member States are required to Corporation. establish a Local Corporation or a Local Branch Office in order to apply for an Additional Licence. POLAND Yes. Foreign entities having their corporate seat No. (or domicile, in case of individuals) within the territory of an EU Member State, the Swiss Confederation or a Member State of both the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and the EEA may directly apply for and hold a Wholesale Licence. Foreign entities registered in other countries are required to have, in addition to the information from URE, at least a Local Branch Office, or preferably a Local Corporation. ROMANIA Yes. A foreign company may apply for the recogni- No. tion of its Wholesale Licence issued in another EU Member State provided it declares on its own liability that it will observe the technical and commercial norms in Romania applicable to the respective activity. A foreign company which is not established within the territory of an EU Member State may only apply for a Wholesale Licence pro- vided it sets up a Local Corporation or a Local Branch Office for the entire duration of such licence validity period. SERBIA Yes. Yes, foreign legal entities can directly apply for Yes, however a foreign legal a Wholesale Licence. entity cannot directly apply for and hold an Additional Licence; it is necessary to establish a Local Corporation in Serbia. 8 Licensing of Electricity and Gas Wholesale Activities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ARE WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES SUBJECT TO DO YOU NEED AN LICENSING MAY A FOREIGN ENTITY DIRECTLY ADDITIONAL LICENCE (NOTIFICA- APPLY FOR AND HOLD A WHOLESALE TO SUPPLY INDUSTRIAL TION)? LICENCE? END-CUSTOMERS? SLOVAK Yes. Foreign entities incorporated and lawfully No. REPUBLIC supplying electricity in a Member State of the EU/EEA are entitled to directly apply for and hold a licence in the Slovak Republic. Foreign entities incorporated in other countries cannot directly apply for and hold a Wholesale Licence. They need to set up a Local Branch Office or a Local Corporation in order to obtain a Wholesale Licence. SLOVENIA No. N/A. Generally, no. Licence is only required for closed distribution systems. UKRAINE Yes. No. Foreign entities are required to establish No. a Local Corporation in order to obtain a Wholesale Licence. 9 2. LICENSING OF NATURAL GAS WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES ARE WHOLESALE ACTIVITIES SUBJECT TO DO YOU NEED AN LICENSING MAY A FOREIGN ENTITY DIRECTLY ADDITIONAL LICENCE (NOTIFICA- APPLY FOR AND HOLD A WHOLESALE TO SUPPLY INDUSTRIAL TION)? LICENCE? END-CUSTOMERS? ALBANIA Yes. No. Foreign entities are required to establish Yes. a Local Corporation in order to apply for a Wholesale Licence. AUSTRIA Wholesale The trade licence may only be obtained by a No. Activities are Local Corporation or a Local Branch Office. subject to prior The extent to which trading activities affecting notification to Austrian territory may be exercised cross- the competent border by EEA and non-EEA companies is not energy regu- fully clarified by case law.
Recommended publications
  • Literacy and Illiteracy in Austria–Hungary. the Case of Bulgarian Migrant Communities
    Hungarian Historical Review 3, no. 3 (2014): 683–711 Penka Peykovska Literacy and Illiteracy in Austria–Hungary. The Case of Bulgarian Migrant Communities The present study aims to contribute to the clarification of the question of the spread of literacy in East Central Europe and the Balkans in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by offering an examination of Bulgarian migrant diasporas in Austria–Hungary and, in particular, in Hungary, i.e. the Eastern part of the Empire. The study of literacy among migrants is important because immigrants represent a possible resource for the larger societies in which they live, so comparisons of the levels of education among migrants (for instance with the levels of education among the majority community, but also with the levels of education among the communities of their homelands) may shed light on how the different groups benefited from interaction with each other. In this essay I analyze data on literacy, illiteracy and semi-literacy rates among migrants on the basis of the Hungarian censuses of 1890, 1900 and 1910. I present trends and tendencies in levels of literacy or illiteracy in the context of the social aspects of literacy and its relationship to birthplace, gender, age, confession, migration, selected destinations and ethnicity. I also compare literacy rates among Bulgarians in Austria–Hungary with the literacy rates among other communities in the Dual Monarchy and Bulgaria and investigate the role of literacy in the preservation of identity. My comparisons and analyses are based primarily (but not exclusively) on data regarding the population that had reached the age at which school attendance was compulsory, as this data more accurately reflect levels of literacy than the data regarding the population as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Literacy and Census: E Case of Banat Bulgarians, 1890–1910
    144 P P Literacy and Census: e Case of Banat Bulgarians, 1890–1910 Literacy is a dynamic category that changes over time. e understanding of writing has gradually been expanding while its public signi cance has been increasing. e transition to widespread literacy was performed from the 17 th to the 19 th centuries and was connected with the rise of the bourgeoisie, with the development of services and technology that generated economic demand for literate workers. is transition was a slow and gradual process and deve- loped at di erent rates in di erent geographical regions, but from a global point of view it was marked by unprecedented social transformation: while in the mid-19 th century only 10% of the adult population of the world could read and write, in the 21 st century – despite the ve-fold increase in population – 80% have basic literacy. 1 In recent decades this transformation has caused a considerable research interest in the history of literacy and the process of over- coming illiteracy. On the Subject of Research Herein, with respect to the spread of literacy in Austria–Hungary are studied the Banat Bulgarians, who are Western Rite Catholics. In 1890 they numbered 14 801 people. At that time the Banat Bulgarians had already been seled in the Habsburg Empire for a century and a half. ey were refugees from the district of Chiprovtsi town (Northwestern Bulgaria) who had le Bulgarian lands aer the unsuccessful anti-Ooman uprising of 1688. Passing through Wallachia and Southwest Transylvania (the laer under Austrian rule) in the 1 Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L129
    Official Journal L 129 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 17 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/791 of 16 May 2019 amending for the 302nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations ..................................................................................................... 1 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/792 of 13 May 2019 entrusting to the European Commission — the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) — the exercise of certain powers conferred on the appointing authority and the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment ............................................................... 3 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/793 of 16 May 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2019) 3797) (1) ............... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ★ Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/794 of 15 May 2019 on a coordinated control plan with a view to establishing the prevalence of certain substances migrating from materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (notified under document C(2019) 3519) (1) .......... 37 (1) Text with EEA relevance. (Continued overleaf)
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr Lidija Radulović Slobodan Vasić Novi Sad, 2016
    UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU ASOCIJACIJA CENTARA ZA INTERDISCIPLINARNE I MULTIDISCIPLINARNE STUDIJE I ISTRAŽIVANJA – ACIMSI CENTAR ZA RODNE STUDIJE Rodni identiteti u intersekciji sa etničkim i religijskim: na primeru istraživanja Banatskih Bugarki u Srbiji, Rumuniji i Bugarskoj doktorska disertacija Mentorka: Kandidat: prof. dr Lidija Radulović Slobodan Vasić Novi Sad, 2016. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Asocijacija centara za interdisciplinarne i multidisciplinarne studije i istraţivanja – ACIMSI Kljuĉna dokumentacijska informacija Redni broj: RBR Identifikacioni broj: IBR Tip dokumentacije: Monografska dokumentacija TD Tip zapisa: Tekstualni štampani materijal TZ Vrsta rada (dipl., mag., dokt.): Doktorska disertacija VR Ime i prezime autora: Slobodan Vasić AU Mentor (titula, ime, prezime, zvanje): prof. dr Lidija Radulović MN Naslov rada: Rodni identiteti u intersekciji sa etniĉkim i NR religijskim: na primeru istraţivanja Banatskih Bugarki u Srbiji, Rumuniji i Bugarskoj Jezik publikacije: srpski jezik JP Jezik izvoda: srp. / eng. JI Zemlja publikovanja: Republika Srbija ZP Uţe geografsko podruĉje: AP Vojvodina, Novi Sad UGP Godina: 2016. GO Izdavaĉ: autorski reprint IZ Mesto i adresa: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu – ACIMSI MA Centar za rodne studije Dr Zorana ĐinĊića 1 21000 Novi Sad Fiziĉki opis rada: (broj poglavlja 4 / stranica 251/ slika u prilogu FO 10/ grafikona 12 / referenci 168 / priloga 3) Nauĉna oblast: Rodne studije NO Nauĉna disciplina: Rodne studije ND Predmetna odrednica, kljuĉne reĉi: Banatske Bugarke, rod, etnicitet, religija,
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L140
    Official Journal L 140 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 28 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/855 of 27 May 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran ............................................ 1 ★ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/856 of 26 February 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the operation of the Innovation Fund (1) .................................................................................. 6 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/857 of 27 May 2019 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 as a feed additive for dairy sheep and dairy goats and repealing Regulation (EC) No 226/2007 (holder of authorisation Danstar Ferment AG represented by Lallemand SAS) (1) ................................................................... 18 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/858 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Meeting of the Parties of the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA), and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2017 establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the Meeting of the Parties of the SIOFA ...................... 21 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/859 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the South Pacific Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Estimation of Seismic Hazard
    ACTIVE FAULT SYSTEMS IN THE SHABLA REGION (BULGARIA) AS INTERPRETED ON GEOPHYSICAL AND SEISMICITY DATA* IRINA STANCIU1,3, DUMITRU IOANE2,3 1 National Institute for Research and Development on Marine Geology and Geo-ecology – GeoEcoMar, Bucharest, [email protected] 2 Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest, [email protected] 3 Romanian Society of Applied Geophysics Shabla region is located in NE Bulgaria and belongs from the tectonic point of view to the south-eastern part of the Moesian Platform. The study area covers parts of the eastern slope of the North Bulgarian arch, having the Bulgarian–Romanian border to the north, Cape Kaliakra to the south, Dobrich city to the west, and the Black Sea shelf to the east. Block faulting, horsts and grabens of different rank are the typical structural features. The crustal-scale Intramoesian Fault, considered to separate the Moesian Platform in two main compartments, reaches the Black Sea continental shelf in Shabla region, its path being ambiguously located on maps, as it does not outcrop. Analysis of regional seismicity data available from ROMPLUS Earthquake Catalogue and EMSC Earthquake Catalogue, integrated with available tectonic and geophysical data, as well as with geological, geomorphological and neotectonic field observations, offered the possibility to interpret W–E, NE–SW and NW–SE active fault systems within the study area and build the grounds for a much more comprehensive understanding of this region’s tectonics. Key words: geophysical data interpretation, regional seismicity, active faults, regional tectonics, Moesian Platform. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. GEOTECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK This study started during the bilateral scientific 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Spatial Plan for the Cross-Border Area Mangalia
    Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Current situation analysis EUROPEAN COMMISSION Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Department A - COSME, H2020 SME and EMFF Unit A3 - EMFF Call reference No: MARE/2014/22 Project Full Name: Cross border maritime spatial planning in the Black Sea – Romania and Bulgaria (MARSPLAN – BS) Project No: EASME/EMFF/2014/1.2.1.5/2/SI2.707672 MSP LOT 1 /BLACK SEA/MARSPLAN-BS European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Volume 1 Current situation analysis - topic paper DELIVRABLE Page 1 Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Current situation analysis 1. Introduction to specific problems of the area The marine spatial plan for Mangalia-Shabla area was conceived as a pilot project included in MATSPLAN -BS project in order to test the capacities of the two countries to develop and adopt a concrete instrument for the management of the marine area. This plan takes into consideration the existing data describing the processes of the natural marine areas as well as the human activities developed in this area in order to establish balance between human actions and ecosystems subsistence. The plan is meant also to to put into practice the EU Directive for MSP, creating an institutional framework for MSP implementation in Romania and Bulgaria, enhancing the cross-border cooperation and exchange of information between the two countries. 1.1 Plan area delimitation The spatial plan area is located at the border between Romania and Bulgaria, its delimitation took into consideration two types of zones: the territorial waters (the management area) and coastal area and EEZ (the extended analyse area for the study of interactions).
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/663
    Official Journal L 112 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 26 April 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ★ Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation ..................................................................................................................... 1 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/658 of 2 March 2015 on the signing, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union ................................................. 2 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/659 of 8 April 2019 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union ................................................. 3 Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part 5 REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU Lays Down Animal Health Control Measures in Relation to African Swine Fever in Certain Member States
    COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 9 October 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States and repealing Implementing Decision 2014/178/EU (notified under document C(2014) 7222) (Text with EEA relevance) 2014/709/EU (OJ No. L 295, 11.10.2014, p. 63) amended by (EU) 2015/251 (OJ No. L 41, 17.02.2015, p. 46) amended by (EU) 2015/558 (OJ No. L 92, 08.04.2015, p. 109) amended by (EU) 2015/820 (OJ No. L 129, 27.05.2015, p. 41) amended by (EU) 2015/1169 (OJ No. L 188, 16.07.2015, p. 45) amended by (EU) 2015/1318 (OJ No. L 203, 31.07.2015, p. 14) amended by (EU) 2015/1372 (OJ No. L 211, 08.08.2015, p. 34) amended by (EU) 2015/1405 (OJ No. L 218, 19.08.2015, p. 16) amended by (EU) 2015/1432 (OJ No. L 224, 27.08.2015, p. 39) amended by (EU) 2015/1783 (OJ No. L 259, 06.10.2015, p. 27) amended by (EU) 2015/2433 (OJ No. L 334, 22.12.2015, p. 46) amended by (EU) 2016/180 (OJ No. L 35, 11.02.2016, p. 12) amended by (EU) 2016/464 (OJ No. L 80, 31.03.2016, p. 36) amended by (EU) 2016/857 (OJ No. L 142, 31.05.2016, p. 14) amended by (EU) 2016/1236 (OJ No. L 202, 28.07.2016, p. 45) amended by (EU) 2016/1372 (OJ No. L 217, 12.08.2016, p. 38) amended by (EU) 2016/1405 (OJ L 228, 23.08.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Current Status of Great Bustard in Bulgaria
    UNEP/CMS/GB/2/Inf.6.1 Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds/BirdLife Bulgaria Study on the current status of Great Bustard in Bulgaria Final Report Prepared by Dr. Petar Iankov Sofia, July 2007 CONTENTS : SUMMARY 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 PART 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 4 PART 2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 6 Preparatory phase 6 Implementation phase 8 PART 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 12 Recent status of the Great Bustard in Bulgaria 12 Identified threats and limiting factors to the Great Bustard in Bulgaria 14 Areas of highest probability for breeding and of interest for reintroduction 18 Great Bustard National Action Plan in Bulgaria 20 PART 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 21 FINANCIAL REPORT 22 REFERENCES 22 SUMMARY The Final Report presents the results of the BSPB 2006-2007 project Study on the current status of Great Bustard in Bulgaria , funded by BirdLife International and BSPB. Once widespread breeder in Bulgaria, at present the situation with the Great Bustard ( Otis tarda ) remains very poorly known. The project aim was to establish the current status of the species in Bulgaria (2000-2007) during breeding and wintering period, to identify possible threats and limiting factors to the species and to assess the possibilities for its eventual reintroduction. The project was implemented by combining enquiry and expedition methods covering two main areas – Western and Central Danubean Plain and Southern Dobrudzha. In total 16 records of Great Bustards were obtained, 3 of which – from the breeding period (2 from Danubean Plain and 1 from Dobrudzha). No documented cases of breeding during the year of the survey (2007).
    [Show full text]
  • B COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 9 October 2014
    02014D0709 — EN — 23.01.2019 — 046.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 9 October 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States and repealing Implementing Decision 2014/178/EU (notified under document C(2014) 7222) (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/709/EU) (OJ L 295, 11.10.2014, p. 63) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/251 of 13 February L 41 46 17.2.2015 2015 ►M2 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/558 of 1 April 2015 L 92 109 8.4.2015 ►M3 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/820 of 22 May 2015 L 129 41 27.5.2015 ►M4 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1169 of 14 July 2015 L 188 45 16.7.2015 ►M5 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1318 of 29 July 2015 L 203 14 31.7.2015 ►M6 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1372 of 7 August 2015 L 211 34 8.8.2015 ►M7 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1405 of 18 August L 218 16 19.8.2015 2015 ►M8 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1432 of 25 August L 224 39 27.8.2015 2015 ►M9 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1783 of 1 October L 259
    [Show full text]
  • EVN Wind Farm: Approved St Nikola Wind Farm: Court of Justice C-141/14
    Case file update 2015 Irina Mateeva Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds Status of wind farm Dobrudzha development in Bulgaria Over 5800 wind turbines in 2010, of which more than 3100 in Dobrudzha Kaliakra - 2006 In Dobrudzha today: Operational – 330 Approved - 1329 Under procedure - 599 2006: ~100, Temporary stopped by MoEW - 235 of which 10 No longer valid – 626 operational Unclear status - 31 Subject of court case against Bulgaria in the European EVN Wind farm: Approved St Nikola Wind farm: Court of Justice C-141/14. in 2005, but the decision Approved in 2007. came into force in 2008 Constructed in 2009 – 2010. because of court case Operational since 2010. procedure. Constructed Radar system for detecting partially in 2009 and 2011- flocks of birds and stop the 2012. Construction was wind farms. Annual stopped by the competent monitoring on migratory and authority in 2009, but wintering birds. Reports because of unknown reasons published, nevertheless that are with unsatisfactory it was finalised in 2012. St Nikola WF Operational since 2012. scientific quality. Radar system for monitoring Identified impacts: large scale displacement of red- of birds, but details are not EVN WF available. Kaliakra WF breasted goose from its Identified impacts : foraging areas in Kaliakra destruction and IBA/SPA; documented bird deterioration of steppe collisions – griffon vulture; habitats; barrier effect on barrier effect on flaying flaying wintering geese and migratory storks and wintering geese. raptors. Kaliakra Wind farm: Approved in 2005. Constructed in 2007- 2008. Operational since 2009. No mechanism to prevent bird collision. Only one year post-construction monitoring. Identified impacts: destruction and deterioration of steppe habitats; documented bird collisions – white pelican, common crane, herring gull, eagle owl; barrier effect on flaying migratory storks and raptors and wintering geese and raptors.
    [Show full text]