DOCSLIB.ORG

The University of Oklahoma Graduate College a Method for Determining Liquid-Junction Electromotive Force by Contact Potential Me

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The University of Oklahoma Graduate College a Method for Determining Liquid-Junction Electromotive Force by Contact Potential Me THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE A METHOD FOR DETERMINING LIQUID-JUNCTION ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE BY CONTACT POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY MARVIN MARTIN MUELLER Norman, Oklahoma 1959 A METHOD FOR DETERMINING LIQUID-JUNCTION ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE BY CONTACT POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS A^ROTOS BY ÿ "5 ^ 1 / ‘ m , . DISSERTATION CŒiMITTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is with pleasure that I declare my indebtedness to the late Professor William Schriever who initially suggested that we make an at­ tempt at measuring phase-boundary potential differences. His friendly interest and encouragement, specifically in the earlier portion of the research, were of considerable benefit. In particular, it should be mentioned that the idea of using a liquid-quadrant electrometer is due to Professor Schriever. To Professor J. Rud Nielsen goes my gratitude for his interest in the latter stages of the research and for his concern in seeing that the apparatus not fall into desuetude after this work is terminated. To the physics shop and, especially, Mr. Jim Hood go ny thanks and commendation for a job well and patiently done. Mr. Hood's care and concern over many months is manifest in the good mechanical performance of the final apparatus. Finally and most personally, 1 wish to record ray heartfelt grat­ itude for the myriad ways in which ny wife, Elvira, has been of help dur­ ing the years of this research. Without her assistance this work would not have been carried out. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES .................................................. v U S T OF ILLUSTRATIONS ........................................... vi Chapter I . HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION..... 1 II. THE CONCEPT OF INTERPHASE POTENTIALS ..................... 9 III. THE LIQUID-JUNCTION POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE ................. 30 IV. THE VARIABLE CAPACITANCE METHOD OF MEASURING VOLTA POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE .................................... 35 V. A METHOD FOR DETERMININGLIQUID-JUNCTION POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES ............................................. 6L V I . THE EXPLORATORY EXPERIMENTAL WORK ........................ 73 VII. THE FINAL APPARATUS ...................................... 91 VIII. EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND RESULTS ...................... 120 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................... 1^2 APPENDIX ........................................................ 133 IV LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Values of Ej in Millivolts Calculated by Four Methods as Described in the Text for Aqueous HGl Concentration Junctions at 25°C ..................................... U7 2. The Effect of Various Applied Field Strengths on the Apparent Contact Potential Difference of the Aluminum-Lucite-Air-Brass Condenser System ...................................... 1^7 LEST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. The Variable Capacitance Instrument .................. 58 2. The Equivalent Circuit of the Variable Capacitance Instrument .................................................. 6l 3. The Principle of the Liquid-liquid Contact Potential Measurement ................................................. 66 U. An Over-all View of the Final Apparatus ................... 96 5. The Solution Troughs and the Probe Assembly .... 101 6. The Junction Chamber Apparatus ....................... 103 ?. The Underside Instrumentation ........................ 112 VI A METHOD FOR DETERMINING IIQUID-JUNCTION ELECTRCMOTIVE FORCE BY CONTACT POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS CHAPTER I HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION The chronicle of attempts at determining individual phase- boundary potential differences is a long and tortuous comedy of errors without a satisfying ending. Even today, after more than a century of work on this question, no single potential difference is known to within reasonable- certainty, - In the pages of this chapter we shall outline the main courses of thought concerning this formidable problem. This discourse will, naturally, not be exhaustive and some of it can be found elsewhere^ with detailed references which are omitted here. Furthermore, we shall re­ serve the precise conceptual picture for the next chapter which will give a modem interpretation of the problem. Here we shall be content to use terms loosely in their historical context. The beginning of thought about phase-boundary potentials is co­ incident with the beginning of electrochemistry. About I8OO Volta dis­ covered his celebrated "pile” and immediately began to conjecture ^J, A. V, Butler, Electrical Phenomena at Interfaces (Methuen and Co„, London, 19^1), 2 concerning its seat of electrical energy which he tentatively put at the metal-metal contact. Volta was led to this postulate by his discovery of what has come to be called the Volta effect— the contact charging of un­ like metals. He found that whenever two dissimilar pieces of metal are put into contact and then separated, they bear opposite electric charges. Thus, it seemed to him that the observed electromotive force of an electrochemical cell should be due largely to the metal-metal contact. By 1870 quantitative methods of measuring the Volta effect had been developed. Kelvin made the opposite pairs of quadrants of his quad­ rant electrometer out of unlike metals and thus determined the contact potential difference between them. (A similar, though much more compli­ cated, method using liquid quadrants is described in Chapter VI.) F. W. Kohlrausch used a null method in which an adjustable potentiometer is connected across two parallel plates of unlike metals. At balance, no deflection of a quadrant electrometer occurs when the plates are touched and separated. The potentiometric potential difference is then equal and opposite to the contact potential difference. It was Kelvin, however, who, in later decades, refined this technique to a relatively high degree of precision. The metal-metal contact potential difference was investi­ gated for many metal pairs and was usually found to be of the order of a few volts and to be markedly dependent of the state of the surface. In particular, oxidation and adsorption of water vapor were found to have a most pronounced effect. In some cases even the sign of the potential difference could be changed by burnishing or heating in air. In summary: the various experimental methods are capable, if suitable precautions are taken, of unambiguously measuring the contact potential difference between 3 two surfaces— the difficulty arises only when an attempt is made to measure the contact potential difference between pure phases. Up till the last two decades, it was believed that a measurement of the contact potential difference between absolutely clean metals in vacuum would be ipso facto a measurement of the potential difference at the metal-metal contact. That this is not so (due to metal-vacuum po­ tential jumps) seems to be at present universally conceded by those few workers who are nowadays concerned with such matters. (We shall discuss this question more thoroughly in the next chapter.) Apart from this, needless to say, the problem of obtaining pure metal surfaces is exceed­ ingly difficult. Duplication of results among workers using the same as well as different techniques has been poor until very recently when mod­ ern ultra-high vacuum techniques were brought to bear on the problem.^ Even now most contact potential measurements between presumably pure met­ als are uncertain to within roughly eighty millivolts or more. For several succeeding decades the study of contact potential difference lay relatively dormant until awakened in the early part of this century by the thorough and refined investigations of thermionic and photoelectric electron emmission conducted largely by Richardson and Millikan. These new and totally different techniques rediscovered the phenomenon and its attendant dependence on surface conditions. It was also found that the contact potential difference between two metal sur­ faces is equal to the difference of their work functions. (This is only approximately true due to the fact that a photoelectric measurement is weighted toward that exposed crystal face which has the smallest woik ^J. C. Riviere, Proc. Roy. Soc. 70B, 676 (1957). u function while the Kelvin method of measuring contact potential difference measures the statistical average over all exposed crystal faces.) In 1916, using the new work function data, Langmuir showed that the contact potential difference between two metals is very roughly equal to the emf of an electrochemical cell composed of the same two metals dipping into normal solutions of their salts. This he took to be a strong indication of the essential correctness of Volta's original hypothesis. 1 2 Butler and Gurney and Fowler seized upon this idea and incorporated it in their kinetic classical and (later) quantum mechanical explanation of electrode potentials. Their treatment, which analyzes the electrode po­ tential into parts contributed by the metallic work function, sublimation energy of the metal atom, ionization energy of the metal ion, andhydra­ tion energy of the ion, has entirely supplanted the vague and inconsistent "solution pressure" hypothesis of Nemst.^ Strangely enough though, even the kinetic picture of electrode processes does not, as we shall see later, answer the old question regarding the seat of the emf. Thus far, we have dealt with only one side of the celebrated con­ troversy concerning the seat of emf in electrochemical cells which has persisted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Chemical Microsensor Systems in CMOS Technology by A
    microtechnology and mems microtechnology and mems Series Editor: H. Baltes H. Fujita D. Liepmann The series Microtechnology and MEMS comprises text books, monographs, and state-of-the-art reports in the very active field of microsystems and microtech- nology. Written by leading physicists and engineers, the books describe the basic science, device design, and applications. They will appeal to researchers, engineers, and advanced students. Mechanical Microsensors By M. Elwenspoek and R. Wiegerink CMOS Cantilever Sensor Systems Atomic Force Microscopy and Gas Sensing Applications By D. Lange, O. Brand, and H. Baltes Micromachines as Tools for Nanotechnology Editor: H. Fujita Modelling of Microfabrication Systems By R. Nassar and W. Dai Laser Diode Microsystems By H. Zappe Silicon Microchannel Heat Sinks Theories and Phenomena By L. Zhang, K.E. Goodson, and T.W. Kenny Shape Memory Microactuators By M. Kohl Force Sensors for Microelectronic Packaging Applications By J. Schwizer, M. Mayer and O. Brand Integrated Chemical Microsensor Systems in CMOS Technology By A. Hierlemann A. Hierlemann Integrated Chemical Microsensor Systems in CMOS Technology With 125 Figures 123 Professor Dr. Andreas Hierlemann Physical Electronics Laboratory ETH Hoenggerberg, HPT-H 4.2, IQE 8093 Zurich Switzerland Email: [email protected] Series Editors: Professor Dr. H. Baltes ETH Zürich, Physical Electronics Laboratory ETH Hoenggerberg, HPT-H6, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland Professor Dr. Hiroyuki Fujita University of Tokyo, Institute of Industrial Science 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan Professor Dr. Dorian Liepmann University of California, Department of Bioengineering 466 Evans Hall, #1762, Berkeley, CA 94720-1762, USA ISSN 1439-6599 ISBN 3-540-23782-8 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2004114045 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Electromotive Force
    Quantum Mechanics_Electromotive force . Electromotive force, also called emf[1] (denoted and measured in volts), is the voltage developed by any source of electrical energy such as a batteryor dynamo.[2] The word "force" in this case is not used to mean mechanical force, measured in newtons, but a potential, or energy per unit of charge, measured involts. In electromagnetic induction, emf can be defined around a closed loop as the electromagnetic workthat would be transferred to a unit of charge if it travels once around that loop.[3] (While the charge travels around the loop, it can simultaneously lose the energy via resistance into thermal energy.) For a time-varying magnetic flux impinging a loop, theElectric potential scalar field is not defined due to circulating electric vector field, but nevertheless an emf does work that can be measured as a virtual electric potential around that loop.[4] In a two-terminal device (such as an electrochemical cell or electromagnetic generator), the emf can be measured as the open-circuit potential difference across the two terminals. The potential difference thus created drives current flow if an external circuit is attached to the source of emf. When current flows, however, the potential difference across the terminals is no longer equal to the emf, but will be smaller because of the voltage drop within the device due to its internal resistance. Devices that can provide emf includeelectrochemical cells, thermoelectric devices, solar cells and photodiodes, electrical generators,transformers, and even Van de Graaff generators.[4][5] In nature, emf is generated whenever magnetic field fluctuations occur through a surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Electrochemistry
    ffirs.qxd 10/29/2005 11:56 AM Page iii FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY Second Edition V. S. BAGOTSKY A. N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Sponsored by THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, INC. Pennington, New Jersey A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION ftoc.qxd 10/29/2005 12:01 PM Page xiv ffirs.qxd 10/29/2005 11:55 AM Page i FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY ffirs.qxd 10/29/2005 11:55 AM Page ii THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY SERIES The Electrochemical Society 65 South Main Street Pennington, NJ 08534-2839 http://www.electrochem.org A complete list of the titles in this series appears at the end of this volume. ffirs.qxd 10/29/2005 11:56 AM Page iii FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY Second Edition V. S. BAGOTSKY A. N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Sponsored by THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, INC. Pennington, New Jersey A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION ffirs.qxd 10/29/2005 11:56 AM Page iv Copyright © 2006 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fixed Surface Potential Probe with the Swing Capacitive Electrometer
    Proc. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Electrostatics of America 1 A Fixed Surface Potential Probe with the Swing Capacitive Electrometer Compared to the Vibrating Kelvin Probe Michael Reznikov Dept. of Integrated Systems Physical Optics Corp., Torrance, CA phone: (1) 310-320-3088 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract— The novel fixed (non-vibrating) Volta potential probe was evaluated in compar- ison with the standard, vibrating (400 Hz) commercial Kelvin probe. While both tested probes demonstrated the similar behavior, there were significant practical advantages of the novel probe. Specifically, the novel probe allows for the elevated distance to the surface and provides more sensitivity to charge under the coating layer. These differences are explained by the analysis of probe circuitry together with the electrostatic approach to the dynamics of the Volta potential measurement. I. INTRODUCTION The capacitive probe method for the measurement of charge induced in the probe elec- trode was proposed by Lord Kelvin (W. Thomson) in 1898 as a capacitive quadrant elec- trometer switching between the immovable probe and discharge shunt while the biasing voltage is applied to the material specimen [1] (see Fig. 1(a)). The using of biasing volt- age and thus the "zero signal" measurement were implemented because the capacitance of the quadrant electrometer is varied during the measurement and thus the measured value depends on the capacitance between the probe electrode and the surface of the specimen. Due to the manual switching and adjustment of biasing voltage, the using of original Kelvin probe was very time-consuming.. In 1932 the vibrating probe method was developed by W.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Electroplating, Electrochemistry and Electronics
    NASF SURFACE TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPERS 80 (10), 1-44 (July 2016) The 15th William Blum Lecture Presented at the 61st AES Annual Convention in Chicago, Illinois June 17, 1974 Electroplating, Electrochemistry and Electronics by George Dubpernell M&T Chemicals Ferndale, Michigan Recipient of the 1973 William Blum AES Scientific Achievement Award Page 1 NASF SURFACE TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPERS 80 (10), 1-44 (July 2016) Contents 1. Historical 3 2. The Periodic Chart 4 3. The consumption of metals in electroplating 5 4. The double standard of electrode potentials - pH and reference electrodes 8 5. On the nature of electrode potentials and hydrogen overvoltage 14 6. Experimental 15 7. Discussion 21 8. Hydrogen overvoltage in electroplating 27 9. Contact potential - Volta potential - Electrostatic surface potential 30 10. The so-called hydrogen electrode 33 11. The Nernst theory of the electromotive activity of ions 34 12. Electrophysiology 35 13. Relationships to electronics 36 14. References 38 15. About the author 43 Page 2 NASF SURFACE TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPERS 80 (10), 1-44 (July 2016) The 15th William Blum Lecture Presented at the 61st AES Annual Convention in Chicago, Illinois June 17, 1974 Electroplating, Electrochemistry and Electronics by George Dubpernell M&T Chemicals Ferndale, Michigan Recipient of the 1973 William Blum AES Scientific Achievement Award Editor’s Note: Originally published as Plating, 62 (4), 327-334 (1975), Plating, 62 (5), 436-442 (1975) and Plating, 62 (6), 573- 580 (1975), this article is a re-publication of the 15th William Blum Lecture, presented at the 61st AES Annual Convention in Chicago, Illinois on June 17, 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Interfacial Potentials in Ion Solvation
    Interfacial Potentials in Ion Solvation A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics of the McMicken College of Arts and Sciences by Carrie Conor Doyle B.S. in Physics, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 2013 June 2020 supervised by Dr. Thomas L. Beck Committee Co-Chair: Dr. Carlos Bolech, Physics Committee Member: Dr. Rohana Wiedjewardhana, Physics Committee Member: Dr. Leigh Smith, Physics Abstract Solvation science is an integral part of many fields across physics, chemistry, and biology. Liquids, interfaces, and the ions that populate them are responsible for many poorly understood natural phenomena such as ion specific effects. Establishing a single-ion solvation free energy thermodynamic scale is a necessary component to unraveling ion-specific effects. This task is made difficult by the experimental immeasurability of quantities such as the interfacial potential between two media, which sets the scale. Computer simulations provide a necessary bridge between experimental and theoretical results. However, computer models are limited by the accuracy-efficiency dilemma, and results are misinterpreted when the underlying physics is overlooked. Classical molecular dynamic techniques, while efficient, lack transferability. Quantum-based ab initio techniques are accurate and transferable, but their inefficiency limits the accessible simulation size and time. This thesis seeks to determine the physical origin of the interfacial potential at the liquid-vapor interface using classical models. Additionally, I assess the ability of Neural Network Potential (NNP) simulation methods to produce electrostatic properties of bulk liquids and interfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Fuel Cells: Fundamentals of Electrochemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics and Solid State Chemistry (II) for the Experienced
    Introduction to fuel cells: Fundamentals of electrochemical kinetics, thermodynamics and solid state chemistry (II) for the experienced Mogens Mogensen Fuel Cells and Solid State Chemistry Risø National Laboratory Technical University of Denmark P.O. 49, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark Tel.: +45 4677 5726; [email protected] Contents • Basics of electromotive force, cell voltage and reversibility • The course of electric potential through a cell - simplified • Potential concepts - energy and voltage • Electric potentials in more details • Examples - the potential and oxygen partial pressure through a YSZ based SOC • Polarisation of the cell and electrode overpotential types • Measurements of electrolyte resistance, reaction resistance and electrode overvoltage by EIS • Three electrode set-up and its problems • Other strategies • Electrode mechanisms • Recommended literature LargeSOFC Summer School 2010 Basics A fuel cell is a galvanic cell also called an electrochemical cell The relation between the chemical energy, ΔG (Gibbs free energy of reaction) of a cell reaction and the equilibrium (ideal) electrical voltage, also called the electromotive force, Emf, of the cell is given by -ΔG = n∙F∙Emf n is the number of electrons exchanged in the total reaction, and F is The Faraday constant = 96485 As/mol LargeSOFC Summer School 2010 Basics Important: ΔG and n must refer to the same reaction scheme! Example 1: 2- - H2 + O ' H2O + 2e - 2- ½O2 + 2e ' O H2 + ½O2 ' H2O 0 n = 2 and ΔG 298 = - 286 kJ/mol H2 Example 2: 2- - 2H2 + 2O ' 2H2O + 4e - 2- O2 + 4e ' 2O 2H2 + O2 ' 2H2O 0 n = 4 and ΔG 298 = - 572 kJ/mol O2 LargeSOFC Summer School 2010 Basics At standard conditions (25 °C and 1 atm): Emf = -ΔG0/(nF) = - (- 286 kJ/mol)/(2*96485 As/mol) = - (- 572 kJ/mol)/(4*96485 As/mol) = 1.23 V ΔG = ΔG0 + RTlnK, K is the constant in the law of mass action This gives us the Nernst equation: RT P EE=+ ln HO2 0 nF P P HO22 LargeSOFC Summer School 2010 Basics The cell voltage may deviate from the theoretical Nernst voltage.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Potentials, Fermi Level Equilibration, and Surface Charging Pekka Peljo,*,† Joséa
    Article pubs.acs.org/Langmuir Contact Potentials, Fermi Level Equilibration, and Surface Charging Pekka Peljo,*,† JoséA. Manzanares,‡ and Hubert H. Girault† † Laboratoire d’Electrochimie Physique et Analytique, École Polytechnique Fedéralé de Lausanne, EPFL Valais Wallis, Rue de l’Industrie 17, Case Postale 440, CH-1951 Sion, Switzerland ‡ Department of Thermodynamics, Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, c/Dr. Moliner, 50, E-46100 Burjasot, Spain *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: This article focuses on contact electrification from thermodynamic equilibration of the electrochemical potential of the electrons of two conductors upon contact. The contact potential difference generated in bimetallic macro- and nanosystems, the Fermi level after the contact, and the amount and location of the charge transferred from one metal to the other are discussed. The three geometries considered are spheres in contact, Janus particles, and core−shell particles. In addition, the force between the two spheres in contact with each other is calculated and is found to be attractive. A simple electrostatic model for calculating charge distribution and potential profiles in both vacuum and an aqueous electrolyte solution is described. Immersion of these bimetallic systems into an electrolyte solution leads to the formation of an electric double layer at the metal−electrolyte interface. This Fermi level equilibration and the associated charge transfer can at least partly explain experimentally observed different electrocatalytic, catalytic, and optical properties of multimetallic nanosystems in comparison to systems composed of pure metals. For example, the shifts in the surface plasmon resonance peaks in bimetallic core−shell particles seem to result at least partly from contact charging. ■ INTRODUCTION of an electric double layer around the particles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partition of Salts (I) Between Two Immiscible Solution Phases and (Ii) Between the Solid Salt Phase and Its Saturated Salt Solution
    ChemTexts (2020) 6:17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-020-0109-0 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) LECTURE TEXT The partition of salts (i) between two immiscible solution phases and (ii) between the solid salt phase and its saturated salt solution Fritz Scholz1 · Heike Kahlert1 · Richard Thede1 Received: 17 December 2019 / Accepted: 2 March 2020 / Published online: 24 April 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The partition of salts between two polar immiscible solvents results from the partition of the cations and anions. Because electroneutrality rules in both phases, the partition of cations is affected by that of anions, and vice versa. Thus, the partition of a salt is determined by the chemical potentials of cations and anions in both phases, and it is limited by the boundary condition of electroneutrality. Whereas the partition of neutral molecules does not produce a Galvani potential difference at the interface, the partition of salts does. Here, the equations to calculate this Galvani potential difference are derived for salts of the general composition CatðzCatÞþAnðzAnÞÀ and for uni-univalent salts CatþAnÀ. The activity of a mCat mAn specific ion in a particular phase can thus be purposefully tuned by the choice of a suitable counterion. Finally, the distribution of a salt between its solid phase and its saturated solution is also presented, together with a discussion of the Galvani potential difference across the interface of the two phases. Graphical abstract Dear Plus, but I do Come over, beloved not like your Minus, we need your phase! charge! Phase α Phase β Keywords Partition · Partition constant · Ion · Salt · Electrolyte · Galvani potential difference · Ion adsorption · Fajans · Precipitation · Titration List of symbols Latin symbols a Activity Fritz Scholz and Heike Kahlert equally contributed as authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Interfacial Electrochemistry 2013 Lecture 4
    jj 0 jj Physical and Interfacial Electrochemistry 2013 Lecture 4. Electrochemical Thermodynamics Module JS CH3304 MolecularThermodynamics and Kinetics Thermodynamics of electrochemical systems Thermodynamics, the science of possibilities is of general utility. The well established methods of thermodynamics may be readily applied to electrochemical cells. We can readily compute thermodynamic state functions such as G, H and S for a chemical reaction by determining how the open circuit cell potential Ecell varies with solution temperature. We can compute the thermodynamic efficiency of a fuel cell provided that G and H for the cell reaction can be evaluated. M Ox,Red Red',Ox' M ' We can also use measurements of equilibrium cell potentials to - + determine the concentration of Anode a redox active substance present Cathode Oxidation Reduction at the electrode/solution interface. e- loss This is the basis for potentiometric e- gain chemical sensing. LHS RHS 1 Standard Electrode Potentials Standard reduction potential (E0) is the voltage associated with a reduction reaction at an electrode when all solutes are 1 M and all gases are at 1 atm. Reduction Reaction - + 2e + 2H (1 M) 2H2 (1 atm) E0 = 0 V Standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) Measurement of standard redox potential E0 for the redox couple A(aq)/B(aq). electron flow Ee reference indicator H2 in electrode Pt electrode SHE P t A(aq) H2(g) H+(aq) B(aq) test redox couple salt bridge E0 provides a quantitative measure for the thermodynamic tendency of a redox couple to undergo reduction or oxidation. 2 Standard electrode potential • E0 is for the reaction as written •The more positive E0 the greater the tendency for the substance to be reduced • The half-cell reactions are reversible •The sign of E0 changes when the reaction is reversed • Changing the stoichiometric coefficients of a half-cell reaction does not change the value of E0 19.3 We should recall from our CH1101 The procedure is simple to apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture6.Pdf
    CHEM465/865, 2006-3, Lecture 6, 18 th Sep., 2006 Electrochemical Thermodynamics – Interfaces and Energy Conversion ϕϕϕ Where does the energy contribution F∑∑∑ zi d N i come from? i First law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy): ∆U = TS ∆ +∆ W Move small amount of charge ( ∆∆∆Q ) of species i through electrical potential difference ϕϕϕ . ϕϕϕ ≠≠≠ 0 ϕϕϕ === ∆ =∆=ϕ ϕ ∆ 0 Wel QzFi N i ∆Q = zF ∆ N i i i Work on charge against inner potential difference. Corresponding differential of the internal energy: UTSpVɶ =−+µ NFz + ϕ N ddd∑ii d ∑ i d i i i Corresponding differential change of Gibbs free energy dGɶ =− STVp d + d +µ d NFz + ϕ d N ∑ii ∑ i i i i Important observation: Only differences µµβα−=−+ µµ βα ϕϕ βα − ɶii ɶ ((( ii))) z i F ((( ))) between phases ααα and β are experimentally available. Gibbs, conclusion of fundamental importance: Electrical potential drop can be measured only between points which find themselves in the phases of one and the same µα=== µ β chemical composition, i.e. i i , and thus, µɶβ−−− µ ɶ α ∆βϕ = ϕ β − ϕ α = i i Galvani potential ααα zi F Otherwise, when the points belong to two different phases , µα≠≠≠ µ β ∆∆∆ βββϕϕϕ i i , experimental determination of ααα is impossible ! Recall: • general situation considered in electrochemistry: phases in contact ααα βββ V σσσ V ∆ βββϕ • potential differences ∆∆ααα ϕϕ control equilibrium between phases and rates of reaction at interface ∆ βββϕ The problem is: ∆∆ααα ϕϕ is not measurable! What is the electrostatic potential of a phase? Related to work needed for bringing test charge into the phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromotive Potential Distribution and Electronic Leak Currents in Working YSZ Based Socs
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 01, 2021 Electromotive Potential Distribution and Electronic Leak Currents in Working YSZ Based SOCs Mogensen, Mogens Bjerg; Jacobsen, Torben Published in: E C S Transactions Link to article, DOI: 10.1149/1.3205660 Publication date: 2009 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Mogensen, M. B., & Jacobsen, T. (2009). Electromotive Potential Distribution and Electronic Leak Currents in Working YSZ Based SOCs. E C S Transactions, 25(2), 1315-1320. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3205660 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. ECS Transactions, 25 (2) 1315-1320 (2009) 10.1149/1.3205660 © The Electrochemical Society Electromotive Potential Distribution and Electronic Leak Currents in Working YSZ Based SOCs Mogens Mogensena, Torben Jacobsenb aFuel Cell and Solid State Chemistry Division, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, The Technical University of Denmark, DK - 4000 Roskilde, Denmark bDepartment of Chemistry, Building 2006, The Technical University of Denmark DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark The size of electronic leak currents through the YSZ electrolyte of solid oxide cells have been calculated using basic solid state electrochemical relations and literature data.
    [Show full text]