DOCSLIB.ORG

Operational Leadership Experiences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operational Leadership Experiences UNCLASSIFIED OOppeerraattiioonnaall LLeeaaddeerrsshhiipp EExxppeerriieenncceess A project of the Combat Studies Institute, the Operational Leadership Experiences interview collection archives firsthand, multi-service accounts from military personnel who planned, participated in and supported operations in the Global War on Terrorism. Interview with MAJ Jarrod Bailey Combat Studies Institute Fort Leavenworth, Kansas © 2014 United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army. All rights reserved. UNCLASSIFIED Abstract In this April 2015 interview, MAJ Jarrod Bailey, US Army, Logistics; discusses his deployment to Iraq as part of a military transition team (MiTT) for 3d Special Troops Battalion (STB) of 187th Infantry, in 2005 through 2006 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). MAJ Bailey talks about his missions as a distribution platoon leader and the MiTT logistics advisor. He describes living conditions and working with the Iraqi army. He discusses some difficult leadership challenges he faced and shares how he was able to boost morale for his team. He shares a specific memory of interaction with the local populace. MAJ Bailey closes his interview by stating, "Don't put a 2LT on a MiTT. They don't really know what they are doing. I learned a lot, but it was kind of being thrown into a fire." UNCLASSIFIED Interview with MAJ Jarrod Bailey 20 April 2015 EK: My name is MAJ Edward Keen (EK) and I'm with the Operational Leadership Experience Project at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. I'm interviewing MAJ Jarrod C. Bailey (JB) on his experiences during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Today's date is April 20, 2015 and this is an unclassified interview. Before we begin, if you feel at any time that we're entering classified territory, please couch your response in terms that avoid revealing any classified information, and if classification requirements prevent you from responding, simply say that you're not able to answer. Before we talk about your deployment, could you give a brief history of your background with the Army? JB: Alright, well, I graduated from college in 2004. I majored in history and commissioned as a Second Lieutenant (2LT) in the Quartermaster branch, and was sent to Fort Lee, Virginia, for my Quartermaster Officer Basic Course. That's how I got started in the Army. EK: With all of the many different branches within the Army, why did you decide to specialize in Logistics? JB: Because the Army told me that's what I was going to specialize in. [laughter] In college, during Reserve Officers' Training Course (ROTC), they ask you what branch you would want to serve in. My top three were Infantry, Artillery, and Armor -- basically, all combat arms. Eighth was Quartermaster, and that's what I got. Once you graduate the Captain's Career Course, they combine the Quartermaster, Transportation, and Ordnance Corps to the Logistics Corps. EK: Okay, thanks for walking me through that. How many deployments in support of the Global War on Terror have you had? JB: Four. My first one was OIF IV in 2005-2006, and then I was home for a year. Then I went to OIF VI for 15 months. I can't recall the dates on that, but it's basically a year after I got back from my first deployment. Then, about 15 months after my second deployment I went to Kuwait with the First Sustainment Brigade for six months, then I came home to take command of a forward support company and three months after I was back from Kuwait, I was over in Afghanistan for 12 months. EK: Okay, so you've been to both OIF and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). JB: Yes. EK: Let's focus on your first deployment, OIF IV 2005-2006. What unit were you assigned to during your deployment? JB: [laughter] Well, I started out -- I was with the Gulf forward support company (FSC) that was 66th Brigade Support Battalion, who was assigned to the 3d of the 320th Field Artillery. But, I was put on a military transition team (MiTT), so I got switched. Once we deployed I was with Operational Leadership Experiences Project, Combat Studies Institute, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 3 UNCLASSIFIED the 3d Special Troops Battalion (STB). We had put together, like I said, a MiTT. Then I was with 3d of the 187th Infantry for most of the deployment. I was also 1st of the 187th for couple months, but 3rd of the 187th was who I was with most of the time. EK: When did you first find out that you would be deploying to Iraq? JB: I first found out -- I think, almost immediately when I signed into the unit. They were preparing for deployment. We knew it was going to be Iraq. So, as soon as I got there in January of 2005, I knew we were deploying. EK: Where did you serve in Iraq during that deployment? JB: When we first got into Kuwait, I was completely detached from the battalion -- the 3d of the 320th -- completely with 3d STB. We got the team together and we were going to do some training up in -- I think it was Taji, Iraq? I think we were there for -- it was the Phoenix Academy. I think it was Taji. Then from there we went up to Baiji, Iraq, which is north Iraq. That was for a few months and then we ended up most of our tour in Tikrit -- or -- excuse me, Samarra, Iraq. That was nine months we spent in Samarra. EK: When you were deployed -- you mentioned your unit had changed -- did your job title change at all? Did it stay the same throughout the deployment? JB: When I was with my original battalion, I was a distribution platoon leader. I was picked to be on the MiTT as the MiTT logistics advisor. Basically, advising an Iraqi battalion logistics officer (S4), as well as any logistics operations. So, during the whole deployment I was the MiTT logistics (LOG) advisor. EK: You mentioned that you changed from the Gulf company, the FSC, to the MiTT. Did you receive appropriately tailored pre-deployment training ahead of time, or were more focused with the unit you were with first? JB: Actually, I trained both -- I trained my platoon to get ready for their deployment, and then I had additional requirements. They would pull us away to train with the MiTT. We were doing internal MiTTs. This was before they had the MiTTs training out of Fort Riley, Kansas, so it was all internal to the brigade. We did a few training exercises as a MiTT together. The best training I got, though, was -- since we were on our own a lot, as a lieutenant, usually I would be driving or being a gun on a high mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicle (HMMWV). We only had about an eight-man team, sometimes down to six, so I found myself driving and being a gunner a lot. The unit I was with -- the 3d Brigade, 105th, the [inaudible], under COL Mike Steele -- he was big on combat stuff, tasks. He had what was called the Rock Top Ten. Basically, it was -- can you fire a weapon all the way from an M-9 to a Mark 19, can you talk on a radio, can you drive a vehicle -- can you do all that? That was actually the best kind of training I got, because if we Operational Leadership Experiences Project, Combat Studies Institute, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 4 UNCLASSIFIED hadn't of done that I wouldn't have known how to do it. I would say we did receive appropriate training. EK: As the MiTT Logistics advisor, did you have Soldiers to train, and if so, did you have much leeway in their training? JB: I had zero Soldiers. I worked with a few non-commissioned officers (NCOs), but they really weren't mine. I wasn't rating anyone. It was basically just me as a 2LT Logistics advisor to an Iraqi battalion. So no, I didn't have any Soldiers to train. I was being trained a lot of the time. EK: You kind of already elaborated on it, but I was wondering if you could be more specific. Once you arrived in country, what were your major responsibilities, as a Logistics advisor? JB: When we first got there, after the Phoenix Academy where they trained us on how to be training teams for Iraqi battalions, we were up in Baiji, Iraq, with the 1st of the 187th Infantry. Our job was to go and assess -- it's not a border patrol, but -- there was a battalion that was protecting infrastructure up in north Iraq, mainly oil pipeline and energy cables. We had to go assess them. We kind of just took a look at how they were operating. Then we handed it off to another team and went down to Samarra for the rest of the deployment where we were with this one Iraqi battalion the rest of the time. My job was to help the S4 and the personnel officer (S1) conduct [inaudible] operations. EK: What was your view of the situation when you first arrived? Either living conditions or threat conditions. JB: Living conditions in northern Iraq -- we were on a base and we got put in a big warehouse they were using as their motor pool. There were a couple rooms to the side we were just stuffed in. -- we had cots. That wasn't the greatest situation. Once we got to Samarra, it was a smaller forward operating base, but it had containerized housing units (CHUs). I got to have a roommate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Early Effects of Gunpowder on Fortress Design: a Lasting Impact
    The Early Effects of Gunpowder on Fortress Design: A Lasting Impact MATTHEW BAILEY COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS The introduction of gunpowder did not immediately transform the battlefields of Europe. Designers of fortifications only had to respond to the destructive threats of siege warfare, and witnessing the technical failures of early gunpowder weaponry would hardly have convinced a European magnate to bolster his defenses. This essay follows the advancement of gunpowder tactics in late medieval and early Renaissance Europe. In particular, it focuses on Edward III’s employment of primitive ordnance during the Hundred Years’ War, the role of artillery in the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople, and the organizational challenges of effectively implementing gunpowder as late as the end of the fifteenth century. This essay also seeks to illustrate the nature of the development of fortification in response to the emerging threat of gunpowder siege weaponry, including the architectural theories of the early Renaissance Italians, Henry VIII’s English artillery forts of the mid-sixteenth century, and the evolution of the angle bastion. The article concludes with a short discussion of the longevity and lasting relevance of the fortification technologies developed during the late medieval and early Renaissance eras. The castle was an inseparable component of medieval warfare. Since Duke William of Normandy’s 1066 conquest of Anglo-Saxon England, the construction of castles had become the earmark of medieval territorial expansion. These fortifications were not simply stone squares with round towers adorning the corners. Edward I’s massive castle building program in Wales, for example, resulted in fortifications so visually disparate that one might assume they were from different time periods.1 Medieval engineers had built upon castle technology for centuries by 1500, and the introduction of gunpowder weaponry to the battlefields of Europe foreshadowed a revision of the basics of fortress design.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Castles
    Gloucestershire Archives Take One Castle Gloucestershire Castles The first castles in Gloucestershire were built soon after the Norman invasion of 1066. After the Battle of Hastings, the Normans had an urgent need to consolidate the land they had conquered and at the same time provide a secure political and military base to control the country. Castles were an ideal way to do this as not only did they secure newly won lands in military terms (acting as bases for troops and supply bases), they also served as a visible reminder to the local population of the ever-present power and threat of force of their new overlords. Early castles were usually one of three types; a ringwork, a motte or a motte & bailey; A Ringwork was a simple oval or circular earthwork formed of a ditch and bank. A motte was an artificially raised earthwork (made by piling up turf and soil) with a flat top on which was built a wooden tower or ‘keep’ and a protective palisade. A motte & bailey was a combination of a motte with a bailey or walled enclosure that usually but not always enclosed the motte. The keep was the strongest and securest part of a castle and was usually the main place of residence of the lord of the castle, although this changed over time. The name has a complex origin and stems from the Middle English term ‘kype’, meaning basket or cask, after the structure of the early keeps (which resembled tubes). The name ‘keep’ was only used from the 1500s onwards and the contemporary medieval term was ‘donjon’ (an apparent French corruption of the Latin dominarium) although turris, turris castri or magna turris (tower, castle tower and great tower respectively) were also used.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theatricality of the Baroque City: M
    THE THEATRICALITY OF THE BAROQUE CITY: M. D. PÖPPELMANN’S ZWINGER AT DRESDEN FOR AUGUSTUS THE STRONG OF SAXONNY PATRICK LYNCH TRINITY HALL CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY 1996 MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY DISSERTATION THE HISTORY AND PHILSOPHY OF ARCHITECTURE 1 CONTENTS: Acknowledgements. Preface. 1 Introduction to the topic of theatricality as an aspect of the baroque. i.i The problem of the term baroque. i.ii The problem of theatricality in the histories of baroque architecture: i.ii.a The theatricality of the Frame. i.ii.b The theatricality of Festival. ii The hermeneutics of theatricality: ii.i Hans-Georg Gadamer's formulation of play, symbol and festival as an interpretation of baroque theatricality. 2 The historical situation of the development of the Zwinger. i The European context. ii The local context. 3 The urban situation of the Zwinger. i Barockstadt Dresden. ii Barockstaat Sachsen. 4 A description of the development of the Zwinger. Conclusion: i Festival and the baroque city. A description of the Zwinger in use as it was inaugurated during the wedding celebrations of Augustus III and Marie Josepha von Habsburg, September 1719. ii Theatricality and the city. Bibliography. Illustrations: Volume 2 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: I would like to thank D.V. for supervising me in his inimitable way, and Dr. Christopher Padfield (and Trinity Hall) for generous financial support. This dissertation is dedicated to my family and friends, absent or otherwise and to C.M. in particular for first showing me the Zwinger and without whose care this document would not exist. PATRICK LYNCH 09/96 3 'Als ich nach der Augustusbrücke kam, die ich schon so gut aus Kupferstichen und Gemälden kannte, kam es mir vor, als ob ich schon früher einmal in Traum hier gewesen wäre.' (As I came upon the Augustusbrücke, which I knew so well from engravings and paintings, it seemed to me as if I had been here once before, in a dream.) Hans Christian Andersen 'This luscious and impeccable fruit of life Falls, it appears, of its own weight to earth.
    [Show full text]
  • MY WAR Exhibition Information
    WARTIME PHOTOGRAPHS by VIETNAM VETERANS Traveling Exhibition WARTIME PHOTOGRAPHS by VIETNAM VETERANS Traveling Exhibition 72 photographs / 7 related texts & poems by 25 Vietnam Veterans Originated by THE HIGHGROUND Veterans Memorial Park Curated by MARISSA ROTH with JUNE BERG Above: BARBED WIRE Marble Mountain, Vietnam, 1970 Dennis High Front cover: GROUP OF THE GUYS FROM THE MORTAR PLATOON WHO OPERATED THE 4.2 INCH MORTARS ON THE HILL Lz Bayonet, Near Chu Lai, Vietnam Jay Arthurs INTRODUCTION We have all seen the iconic Vietnam War photographs by noted photojournalists, such This emulsified visual poetry records youthful experiences that many didn’t want to as Nick Ut’s “Napalm Girl” and Eddie Adams’ “Saigon Execution.” These and count- have in the first place and never imagined would etch so deeply into such signifi- less other images appeared in newspapers and magazines across America throughout cant markers on the roads of their lives. In the years that followed, many veterans de- the war, impacting both governmental policy and public opinion. Photographers were stroyed their photographs taken during the war in order to purge painful memories crying out with potent images for the cessation of the war, gravely highlighting the and close a visceral door to the past. consequences for both sides of this mired conflict. They viewed the war from the out- side looking in, for what would become the last uncensored American war endeavor. Anonymity and camaraderie are the hallmarks of soldiering and war, but for each man who fought and died, or lived and came home, this war was personal. These photo- What of pictures taken from the inside looking out? Some servicemen in Vietnam made graphs allow the viewer to see into the daily lives of some men who fought and served.
    [Show full text]
  • Motte and Bailey Castles
    Motte and Bailey Castles What Is a Motte and Bailey Castle? The motte: This was a __________ with a tower (or ‘keep’) built on ________. The bailey: This was where the soldiers, ___________ and animals lived. It had a _____________ fence around it. The keep: This was the tower or ___________. The moat: This was a deep _________ filled with water. Label the picture below, using the bold words above. Who Built Motte and Bailey Castles? Motte and bailey castles were built in____________ by the Normans (people who _________ from France). What Else Was in a Motte and Bailey Castle? • bakeries • barracks (buildings for soldiers) • ___________ • ___________ for horses Word Bank Ireland stables wooden hill kitchens ditch castle top servants came Motte and Bailey Castles Answers What Is a Motte and Bailey Castle? The motte: This was a hill with a tower (or ‘keep’) built on top. The bailey: This was where the soldiers, servants and animals lived. It had a wooden fence around it. The keep: This was the tower or castle. The moat: This was a deep ditch filled with water. Label the picture below, using the bold words above. keep motte bailey moat Who Built Motte and Bailey Castles? Motte and bailey castles were built inIreland by the Normans (people who came from France). What Else Was in a Motte and Bailey Castle? • bakeries • barracks (buildings for soldiers) • kitchens • stables for horses Word Bank Ireland stables wooden hill kitchens ditch castle top servants came Page 1 of 1 Motte and Bailey Castles What Is a Motte and Bailey Castle? The motte was a _______ hill, which would normally be man-made.
    [Show full text]
  • Peering Through the Watch Tower: How Jehovah's Witnesses Learn To
    On-Line Papers – Copyright This online paper may be cited or briefly quoted in line with the usual academic conventions. You may also download them for your own personal use. This paper must not be published elsewhere (e.g. to mailing lists, bulletin boards etc.) without the author's explicit permission. Please note that if you copy this paper you must: • include this copyright note • not use the paper for commercial purposes or gain in any way • you should observe the conventions of academic citation in a version of the following form: Andrew Holden, ‘Peering Through the Watch Tower: How Jehovah’s Witnesses Learn to Worship and Evangelise’, published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Holden-Peering-Through-the-Watch- Tower.pdf Publication Details This web page was last revised on 29th November 2003; the paper was previously published at http://comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc116ajw.htm in 2002 Peering Through the Watch Tower: How Jehovah’s Witnesses Learn to Worship and Evangelise Andrew Holden ABSTRACT Jehovah’s Witnesses are members of a puritanical religious movement that claims to be in but not of the world. The movement has expanded rapidly over the past 130 years and there are now more than 6 million devotees worldwide. This paper examines the ways in which the movement has managed to retain a millenarian orientation in a world that is, for the most part, indifferent to its beliefs. The Witnesses reject many commonly recognised accoutrements of sacred practise such as mystical concepts, awesome rituals and transcendental symbolism in favour of a rationalised form of religion based on the study of published texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Native Invasive Plants of Arizona – 2009
    NON-NATIVE, INVASIVE PLANTS OF ARIZONA PRODUCED BY CONSERVATION DISTRICTS AND RC&D AREAS OF ARIZONA, AND THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Peer Reviewed #AZ1482 _______________ This guide is dedicated to the memory of Carol Bailey 1945-2008 “It’s not how many hours you put in but how much you put into the hours.” _______________ COVER PHOTO: Sweet resin bush on Frye Mesa near Thatcher, AZ _______________ Published 2009 First Edition Published, 2001 This publication is made possible through the generous donations of the following sponsors: • Conservation Districts of Arizona • RC&D Councils of Arizona • Bureau of Land Management • South Coast RC&D • Southeast Arizona Land Trust • University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Editor: • Larry D. Howery, Ph.D., Rangeland Specialist, School of Natural Resources, The University of Arizona, Cooperative Extension Authors: • Ed Northam, Ph.D., The University of Arizona, Cooperative Extension • Walter Meyer, Ph.D., Range Science, The University of Arizona, Cooperative Extension Contributing Authors: • Jennifer Arnold-Musa, USDA-NRCS Rangeland Management Specialist • Emilio Carrillo, USDA-NRCS Rangeland Management Specialist • Kristen Egen, USDA-NRCS District Conservationist • Mary Hershdorfer, USDA-NRCS Assistant Manager, Plant Materials Center Special thanks to: • *Bugwood.org (www.forestryimages.org) • Dr. Richard Lee, Bureau of Land Management • Dr. Tom Whitson, Weeds Specialist, University of Wyoming • Donna Matthews, USDA-NRCS, Coronado RC&D • Kim Webb, Coronado RC&D • Patina Thompson, Coronado RC&D • Laurie Abbott, New Mexico State University • Jeff Schalau, U of A Cooperative Extension in Prescott • Patti Fenner, Noxious Weed Program Manager of the Tonto National Forest TABLE OF CONTENTS Common name Plant number Grasses Buffelgrass ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Motte and Bailey Castle at Aldford by Bevis Sale and Rich Turner
    The Motte and Bailey Castle at Aldford by Bevis Sale and Rich Turner This substantial set of earthworks is the best surviving example of a Norman Castle in Cheshire. Though large in size, they are typical of the many motte and bailey castles which survived throughout England and Wales. There original aim was to provide protection for the new Norman landlords who had taken over the Saxon manors. They continued to be built well into the 12' century and especially during periods of civil unrest which racked England during this period. When plotted on a distribution map they also seem to have another function. There is a great concentration of these castles throughout the Welsh Marches from Cheshire down to Gloucestershire which provided a well defended informal frontier between England and Wales (Renn, 1968). Husain (1973) has gone further and suggested that the castles at Shotwick Park, Trueman's Hill Hawarden, Dodleston, Pulford and Aldford were built as an outer defense to Chester, but without accurate dates of construction it is difficult to defend this argument. The two jrincipal earthworks at Aldford, the motte and the bailey will be described separately. The motte contains a very large &ea for a non-royal castle (1280 sq.m). The motte top is sub-rectangular and almost flat, except for mounds of rubble in the south-eastern and north-eastern comers. The motte was formerly tree covered and shallow pits where stumps were removed are just visible and there is one irregular pit showing sandstone rubble. Therefore it seems unlikely that there was not a central tower or donjon to the motte as its collapse or foundations would have left a raised entre'.
    [Show full text]
  • Conquest of the Castles
    Conquest of the Castles Chapter 1 - Introduction Who is William: William was born in Circa 1028 Falaise, Normandy, France. At the age of eight, William the Conqueror became duke of Normandy and later King of England. Violence plagued his early reign, but with the help of King Henry I of France, William managed to survive his early years. William was knighted by Henry at the age of 14. By 1064 he had Conquered two neighbouring provinces, Brittany and Maine. Battle for the Throne: While this was happening the Childless king, Edward the Confessor was dieing. William had a weak link to Edward as his mother was William's Grandfather's sister. And Edward had promised William the throne. But once Edward had passed the most powerful lord in England, Harold Godwinson ( Edward's brother-in-law) crowned himself king as he didnt want a foreigner to take the English throne, despite the oath that Edward made to Willam. William in his rage decided to assemble an army to invade England. William was ready to set off on his voyage to conquer England when the winds changed so he had to delay his trip for several weeks. In the meantime there was another claim to the throne by a Norewegain King, Harold Hardraada who invaded England from the North Sea which meant Harold Godwins and his men had to quickly march up to York to defend England from Norway. When William heard that Harold had to march all the way up to York to defeat another enemy the winds changed so he was able to Invade England from the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did William I Build Motte and Bailey Castles?
    Why did William I build motte and bailey castles? TASK 1: Where would you build a castle, and why? TASK 2: stick in the small diagram in your book. Label it using this picture. Keep – fortress building Motte – man- made hill Bailey – houses surrounded by a wall Stone gate Drawbridge tower Moat / Water- Wooden palisade filled ditch / wall TASK 3: Answer the following questions in full sentences in your book. You have not been given any information – you will have to think very hard! 1. Write down as many reasons as you can why William needed castles. 2. What do you think was wrong with a Motte and Bailey castle? Why did they have to be changed into a different type of castle? (Think carefully!) 3. Why do you think William built wooden castles first? How easy was it to attack a Medieval castle? War in medieval times was about the control of land. Knights and other soldiers who lived in castles controlled the land around their stone fortresses. To conquer a territory, an attacking army would have to strike and take these castles. To do so, they would launch a siege. Here we describe some of the major weapons and strategies. 1. Direct Assault A direct assault was the most dangerous way for attackers to try to take a castle. Soldiers either scaled walls with ladders or overran castle walls breached (broken by) by battering rams, or cannons. Sometimes they attacked two or three spots around the castle at once to surprise the defenders. Sometimes they approached the wall whilst hidden within a trench.
    [Show full text]
  • Air America in Laos II – Military Aid by Dr
    Air America in Laos II – military aid by Dr. Joe F. Leeker Part II First published on 29 May 2006, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) Air America in Laos: military and paramilitary aid 1968-1973 Madriver operations 1968-73 During the 1968-73 period, the original Madriver contract had been transformed into contract no. F62531-67-0028 for Fiscal Years 68, 69, and 70 on 1 July 67, but as before, this contract covered flying services to be provided by an ever growing number of Udorn-based UH-34Ds plus the operation of one C-47 out of Bangkok, apparently a courier aircraft.1 On 1 July 70, that contract was followed by contract no. F04606-71-C-0002 that covered the Udorn-based UH-34Ds, the Bangkok-based C-47 plus a Udorn-based Volpar, apparently another courier aircraft.2 That contract is much more complex, as it does not only cover flying services to be performed by the UH-34Ds and the 2 transport planes, but also drop-in maintenance of Raven O-1 and U-17 aircraft, crash / battle damage repair to DEPCHIEF- managed T-28s, support services to the Khmer Air Force and a lot of other operation and maintenance services. But apart from the prices, section XIV dealing with “Flying Services for Government furnished UH-34 aircraft (Item 1)” is not much different from similar sections in earlier versions of the Madriver contract.3 So it can be assumed that the types of missions flown by Air America’s UH-34Ds were still more or less the same as those described for the pre-1968 period.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    www.nysmm.org Glossary of Terms Some definitions have links to images. ABATIS: Barricade of felled trees with their branches towards the attack and sharpened (primitive version of "barbed wire"). ARROW SLITS: Narrow openings in a wall through which defenders can fire arrows. (also called loopholes) ARTILLERY: An excellent GLOSSARY for Civil War era (and other) Artillery terminologies can be found at civilwarartillery.com/main.htm (Link will open new window.) BAILEY: The walled enclosure or the outer courtyard of a castle. (Ward, Parade) BANQUETTE: The step of earth within the parapet, sufficiently high to enable standing defenders to fire over the crest of the parapet with ease. BARBICAN: Outworks, especially in front of a gate. A heavily fortified gate or tower. BARTIZAN (BARTISAN): Scottish term, projecting corner turret. A small overhanging turret on a tower s battlement. BASTION: A projection from a fortification arranged to give a wider range of fire or to allow firing along the main walls. Usually at the intersection of two walls. BATTER: Inclined face of a wall (Talus). BATTERED: May be used to describe crenellations. BATTERY: A section of guns, a named part of the main fortifications or a separate outer works position (e.g.. North Battery, Water Battery). BATTLEMENTS: The notched top (crenellated parapet) of a defensive wall, with open spaces (crenels) for firing weapons. BEAKED PROJECTION: see EN BEC. BELVEDERE: A pavilion or raised turret. BLOCKHOUSE: Usually a two story wood building with an overhanging second floor and rifle loops and could also have cannon ports (embrasures). Some three story versions. Some with corner projections similar to bastions.
    [Show full text]