DOCSLIB.ORG

GY 112 Lecture Notes D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GY 112 Lecture Notes D GY 112 Lecture Notes D. Haywick (2006) 1 GY 112 Lecture Notes Significance of Fossils: Time Lecture Goals: A) Chronostratigraphy versus Biostratigraphy B) Paleontological correlations (facies changes) C) Index fossils Textbook reference: Levin 7th edition (2003), Chapters, 3 & 4; Levin 8th edition (2006), Chapter 6) A) Chronostratigraphy vs. biostratigraphy Last time we talked about the history of geological thinking and how geological ideas evolved. You will be glad to know that we are just about done with historical figures (some of you have confessed that you are not all that interested in people and places. “Bring us the rocks!” you have cried. I will do my best to satisfy your every wish; however, I suspect that you will regret your words once we really get into the rocks and fossils. William (Fossil Bill) Smith was one of the first people to use fossils to age rocks (okay so I lied, we will still occasionally talk about dead people). He used them to correlate strata from one place to another over the English country side. Correlation of rock units is not always easy. Take the following situation: Being able to trace rocks units is vitally important both for geological mapping and for stratigraphic correlation, but geologists are often faced with situations like that depicted here. Which of the limestones exposed in Mountain 2 is equivalent to the limestone exposed in Mountain 1? There are several ways that you can correlate these rock units. The first is by using absolute dating techniques. If you were to radiometrically date the limestones at each mountain, you could then match them up. This form of correlation is called chronostratigraphy (chrono means time). Unfortunately, it is generally not possible to use radiometrically dating on limestones. They just do not have enough radioactive isotopes within them to conduct radiometric dating. Another way to correlate the limestones is to match up their respective lithologies. True, they are all limestone, but there are different types of limestone. There is fossiliferous limestone, non-fossiliferous limestone, evaporitic limestone and oolitic limestone. If the outcrop at Mountain 1 is an oolitic limestone, and there is an oolitic limestone at GY 112 Lecture Notes D. Haywick (2006) 2 Mountain 2, then it is possible that the two are correlative. This form of matching is called lithostratigraphy (after lithology). Beware! The two oolites may not be the same time wise. Sedimentary rocks frequently grade laterally into other lithologies. This is called a facies change and we will discuss it further shortly. For limestone, the best means of correlation is through fossil content. Identically aged limestones should contain fossils of the same age (but not necessarily the same ones – think about it). This form of correlation is called biostratigraphy and it is an exceptionally important component of geology. My paleontology colleague here at South, Dr. Murlene Clark, using biostratigraphy in her research. Biostratigraphy is also important in the petroleum industry. In many cases, it is the only way to trace rock units underground from one oil well to another. There are however, some complications. You must first know how widespread the fossils you are dealing with were when they were alive. Here is an example of what I mean. Some freshwater fish are very widespread. In the United States, you can pretty much go bass fishing in any lake you find. Bass are considered cosmopolitan species at least within lakes in the US. In addition, Alabama is home to a pretty rare variety of sturgeon. This fish is only found in a few rivers in Alabama, so you would be out of luck trying to catch it in a lake in Colorado. This sturgeon is an example of an endemic species. Fossils could be either cosmopolitan or endemic. The best beasties for correlation purposes are those that were cosmopolitan. Endemic beasties may be better for paleoenvironmental interpretations. We’ll get to this next time. B) Paleontological correlations (facies changes) The best way to handle this topic is with a cartoon. Assume that you have identified several cosmopolitan beasties within some strata. There are starfishes, snails, clam shells and horn corals. They are all marine and with the exception of the snails, are found in all sedimentary lithologies (shale, sandstone and limestone). The snails you have encountered do not occur in shale. Many organisms have a preference for a particular type of sedimentary substrate. They are cosmopolitan in nature, but live in specific environments. The following is the cartoon that I eluded to earlier: GY 112 Lecture Notes D. Haywick (2006) 3 and here is the best possible correlation of the rock units: From a biostratigraphic point of view, the trick is to match up the rock layers on the basis of their fossil content. When you do it, you will learn several things about their stratigraphy. • Sandstone A thickens from section 1 to section 3. • Limestone B thins from section 1 to section 3 (Lateral thickness changes are very common in sedimentary successions. • Shales C and E are pretty consistent thickness at sections 1 and 2, but merge together at section 3 • Sandstone D thins from section 1 to section 2 and is absent from section 3. (This is called a pinchout; they are also common in sedimentary successions) • Limestone E (section1) passes laterally into a sandstone at section 2. (This is called a facies change and they are also common in sedimentary successions) • The sandstone mentioned above probably undergoes yet another facies change into a shale at section 3. This latter correlation is made on the basis of the rugose corals alone. The snails are not present in the shale at section 3 and unless you remember that the snails could not live in the environment where shale was deposited, you might have concluded wrongly that no correlation was possible between sections 2 and 3. Biostratigraphic correlations are not always straight-forward. If they were, everyone could do them and Dr. Clark would be out of a job. C) Index fossils All organisms eventually evolve into new forms. Human beings today (Homo sapiens sapiens) replaced an earlier now extinct sub-species called Homo sapiens neanderthalensis (Neanderthal Man). Most species have limited time ranges, generally GY 112 Lecture Notes D. Haywick (2006) 4 less than 4 million years. One of the things that paleontologists try to do is to identify the age at which a species first evolves (this is called the FAD; the First Appearance Datum) and the age at which a species dies off (the LAD; last appearance datum). The time between the FAD and the LAD of a species is considered its Biozone. If a species is cosmopolitan and has a well constrained age span, it can be regarded as an index fossil. Index fossils allow you to establish (relatively accurately) the age of a sedimentary rock. Another way to age rocks is to use FAD and LAD data from several fossils within a rock. An example of this is shown in the cartoon below: GY 112 Lecture Notes D. Haywick (2006) 5 A rock containing all 3 fossils is necessarily constrained to a narrow time range, in this case the Early Jurassic. The boxed interval is considered to be a fossil assemblage zone. Given the number of fossils that have been identified in the rock record, it is not surprising that biostratigraphic and paleontological data have become quite voluminous. Don’t believe me, check out the two next diagrams that deal with one type of beastie (foraminifera) over one short interval of time (Cenozoic) from one small part of the planet (New Zealand). Multiply this by a couple 100,000 times and you’ll get an idea about the amount of stuff that is out there. Both figures are from Hornibrook, N. de et al, 1989. Manual of New Zealand Permian to Pleistocene Foraminiferal Biostratigraphy. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontology Bulletin 56, 175p GY 112 Lecture Notes D. Haywick (2006) 6 GY 112 Lecture Notes D. Haywick (2006) 7 Important terms/concepts from today’s lecture (Google any terms that you are not familiar with) Chronostratigraphy Lithostratigraphy Biostratigraphy Cosmopolitan Endemic Pinchout Facies change Index fossils FAD (first appearance datum) LAD (last appearance datum) Biozone Assemblage zone .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Pliocene Deposits, Antarctic Continental Margin (ANDRILL 1B Drill Core) Molly F
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln ANDRILL Research and Publications Antarctic Drilling Program 2009 Significance of the Trace Fossil Zoophycos in Pliocene Deposits, Antarctic Continental Margin (ANDRILL 1B Drill Core) Molly F. Miller Vanderbilt University, [email protected] Ellen A. Cowan Appalachian State University, [email protected] Simon H. H. Nielsen Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/andrillrespub Part of the Oceanography Commons, and the Paleobiology Commons Miller, Molly F.; Cowan, Ellen A.; and Nielsen, Simon H. H., "Significance of the Trace Fossil Zoophycos in Pliocene Deposits, Antarctic Continental Margin (ANDRILL 1B Drill Core)" (2009). ANDRILL Research and Publications. 61. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/andrillrespub/61 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Antarctic Drilling Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in ANDRILL Research and Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Antarctic Science 21(6) (2009), & Antarctic Science Ltd (2009), pp. 609–618; doi: 10.1017/ s0954102009002041 Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press Submitted July 25, 2008, accepted February 9, 2009 Significance of the trace fossil Zoophycos in Pliocene deposits, Antarctic continental margin (ANDRILL 1B drill core) Molly F. Miller,1 Ellen A. Cowan,2 and Simon H.H. Nielsen3 1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA 2. Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA 3. Antarctic Research Facility, Florida State University, Tallahassee FL 32306-4100, USA Corresponding author — Molly F.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrapod Biostratigraphy and Biochronology of the Triassic–Jurassic Transition on the Southern Colorado Plateau, USA
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 244 (2007) 242–256 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Triassic–Jurassic transition on the southern Colorado Plateau, USA Spencer G. Lucas a,⁎, Lawrence H. Tanner b a New Mexico Museum of Natural History, 1801 Mountain Rd. N.W., Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375, USA b Department of Biology, Le Moyne College, 1419 Salt Springs Road, Syracuse, NY 13214, USA Received 15 March 2006; accepted 20 June 2006 Abstract Nonmarine fluvial, eolian and lacustrine strata of the Chinle and Glen Canyon groups on the southern Colorado Plateau preserve tetrapod body fossils and footprints that are one of the world's most extensive tetrapod fossil records across the Triassic– Jurassic boundary. We organize these tetrapod fossils into five, time-successive biostratigraphic assemblages (in ascending order, Owl Rock, Rock Point, Dinosaur Canyon, Whitmore Point and Kayenta) that we assign to the (ascending order) Revueltian, Apachean, Wassonian and Dawan land-vertebrate faunachrons (LVF). In doing so, we redefine the Wassonian and the Dawan LVFs. The Apachean–Wassonian boundary approximates the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. This tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Triassic–Jurassic transition on the southern Colorado Plateau confirms that crurotarsan extinction closely corresponds to the end of the Triassic, and that a dramatic increase in dinosaur diversity, abundance and body size preceded the end of the Triassic. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Triassic–Jurassic boundary; Colorado Plateau; Chinle Group; Glen Canyon Group; Tetrapod 1. Introduction 190 Ma. On the southern Colorado Plateau, the Triassic– Jurassic transition was a time of significant changes in the The Four Corners (common boundary of Utah, composition of the terrestrial vertebrate (tetrapod) fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronological and Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Lower Cretaceous Dalazi Formation from the Yanji Basin, NE China, and Its Tectonic Implication
    minerals Article Geochronological and Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Lower Cretaceous Dalazi Formation from the Yanji Basin, NE China, and its Tectonic Implication Zhongshan Shen 1,2,3, Zhiqiang Yu 4,5,* , Hanqing Ye 1,2,3, Zuohuan Qin 6 and Dangpeng Xi 6 1 State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; [email protected] (Z.S.); [email protected] (H.Y.) 2 College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China 4 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China 5 CAS Centre for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044, China 6 State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] (Z.Q.); [email protected] (D.X.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Lower Cretaceous Dalazi Formation in the Yanji Basin, eastern Jilin Province is of particular interest because it contains key fresh water fossil taxa, oil and gas resources, a potential terrestrial Albian–Cenomanian boundary, and regional unconformities. However, the lack of a Citation: Shen, Z.; Yu, Z.; Ye, H.; Qin, precise chronology for the non-marine strata has precluded a better understanding of the regional Z.; Xi, D. Geochronological and stratigraphic correlation and terrestrial processes. Here, we report magnetostratigraphic and U–Pb Paleomagnetic Constraints on the geochronologic results of a sedimentary sequence from the Xing’antun section in the Yanji Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy
    Biostratigraphy Geology 331 Paleontology The Grand Canyon of the Colorado River in Arizona Lithostratigraphic correlation between Grand Canyon, Zion, and Bryce Canyon national parks allows construction of a composite stratigraphic column. Lithostratigraphic correlation Grand Canyon, Zion Canyon, Bryce Canyon between Grand Canyon, Zion, and Bryce Canyon national parks Top of Navaho Ss. allows construction of a Top of Kaibab Ls. composite stratigraphic column. Zion Canyon National Park, Jurassic Sedimentary Rocks Jurassic Navaho Sandstone, Zion National Park, wind-blown cross-bedding. Bryce Canyon, Utah, Cretaceous sedimentary rocks Correlation • Determination of the equivalence of bodies of rock at different locations. There are two kinds of correlation: • Lithostratigraphic - matching up continuous formations. • Chronostratigraphic - matching up rocks of the same age. Usually done with fossils using biostratigraphy. Correlation • Over short distances lithostratigraphic correlation is the same as chronostratigraphic correlation. • Over medium distances they are not the same. • Over long distances only chronostratigraphic correlation can be used. Original Lateral Continuity: permits lithostratigraphic correlation – note the continuous beds Lithostratigraphic and Chronostratigraphic Relationships Sedimentary facies, and their subsequent rocks, are usually time-transgressive. http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/G331/lectures/331strat.html Sedimentary Facies Modern Barrier Island Time Lines Sedimentary Facies in the subsurface Wire line logs Time
    [Show full text]
  • New Radiometric 40Ar–39Ar Dates and Faunistic Analyses Refine
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New radiometric 40Ar–39Ar dates and faunistic analyses refne evolutionary dynamics of Neogene vertebrate assemblages in southern South America Francisco J. Prevosti1,2*, Cristo O. Romano2,3, Analía M. Forasiepi2,3, Sidney Hemming4, Ricardo Bonini2,5, Adriana M. Candela2,6, Esperanza Cerdeño2,3, M. Carolina Madozzo Jaén2,7,8, Pablo E. Ortiz2,7, François Pujos2,3, Luciano Rasia2,6, Gabriela I. Schmidt2,9, Matias Taglioretti10,11,12, Ross D. E. MacPhee13 & Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas2,14,15 The vertebrate fossil record of the Pampean Region of Argentina occupies an important place in South American vertebrate paleontology. An abundance of localities has long been the main basis for constructing the chronostratigraphical/geochronological scale for the late Neogene–Quaternary of South America, as well as for understanding major patterns of vertebrate evolution, including the Great American Biotic Interchange. However, few independently-derived dates are available for constraining this record. In this contribution, we present new 40Ar/39Ar dates on escorias (likely the product of meteoric impacts) from the Argentinean Atlantic coast and statistically-based biochronological analyses that help to calibrate Late Miocene–Pliocene Pampean faunal successions. For the type areas of the Montehermosan and Chapadmalalan Ages/Stages, our results delimit their age ranges to 4.7–3.7 Ma and ca. 3.74–3.04 Ma, respectively. Additionally, from Buenos Aires Province, dates of 5.17 Ma and 4.33 Ma were recovered for “Huayquerian” and Montehermosan faunas. This information helps to better calibrate important frst appearances of allochthonous taxa in South America, including one of the oldest records for procyonids (7.24–5.95 Ma), cricetids (6.95– 5.46 Ma), and tayassuids (> 3.74 Ma, oldest high-confdence record).
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Number 80
    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents 80 Editorial 2 Association Business 3 News 16 Association Meetings 19 From our correspondents The very Dickens of a palaeontologist 23 PalaeoMath 101: Round the Bend … 32 Future meetings of other bodies 49 Meeting Report British Ecological Society Macro-SIG 57 Reporter: A fossil-fuelled future? 60 Encouraging palaeontology in schools 63 James Mckay – palaeo artist 75 Caithness fish on Edinburgh street 79 Palaeontology vol 55 parts 3 & 4 82–83 SPP 87: Tabulate Corals in Poland 84 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no 81 is 3rd November 2012. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 80 2 Editorial Summer is upon us, whatever that means for you. For me in Scotland it is the long hours of daylight and the chance to get round lots of mountaintops in a day and collect fossils in better light than usual. As the short report about Ken Shaw’s fossil fish find in a paving slab in the heart of Edinburgh shows, sometimes exciting finds await us in rather unexpected places. For others, school is out – but Gordon Neighbour’s article on palaeontology and schools reminds us that we should be looking to what we can do to help encourage school pupils to engage with palaeontology. Although Liam Herringshaw’s somewhat downbeat article about the lack of retention of post-Ph.D. palaeontologists by UK universities and other institutions may have those pupils asking why they should focus on palaeontology. The analytical palaeobiologist in me would ask immediately whether other “clades” of Earth Scientists are having a similarly hard time of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy and Palaeobiology of Early Neoproterozoic Strata of the Kola Peninsula, Northwest Russia
    Biostratigraphy and palaeobiology of Early Neoproterozoic strata of the Kola Peninsula, Northwest Russia JOAKIM SAMUELSSON Samuelsson, J.: Biostratigraphy and palaeobiology of Early Neoproterozoic strata of the Kola Peninsula, Northwest Russia. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 77, pp. 165-192. Oslo 1997. ISSN 0029-196X. Shales and siltstones from the Early Neoproterozoic K.ildinskaya, Volokovaya and Einovskaya Groups and the Skarbeevskaya Fonnation (Kildin Island, Sredni and Rybachi Peninsulas) and the Chapoma Fonnation (Tiersky Coast) on the Kola Peninsula, Northwest Russia yielded assemblages of moderately well-preserved organic-walled acid-resistant microfossils (acritarchs, and prob­ able cyanobacterial sheaths). The assemblages consist of cosmopolitan taxa recovered from various Early Neoproterozoic (Late and Terminal Riphean) settings in Scandinavia, Russia, Yakutia, North America and elsewhere. Among the recovered taxa, Lopho­ sphaeridium laufeldii Vida) 1976 comb. nov., Satka colonialica Jankauskas, Simia annulare (Timofeev) Mikhailovna, Tasmanites rifejicus Jankauskas, Valeria lophostriata Jankauskas and Vandalosphaeridium ?varangeri Vida! are regarded as the biostratigraphi­ cally most significant. One taxon, Trachysphaeridium laufeldi Vida) is transferred to Lophosphaeridium laufeldii (Vida!) Samuelsson comb. nov. The units examined herein are all considered to be Late Riphean in age and are correlated with other units of similar age in northem and southem Scandinavia, Svalbard, East Greenland and the southem Urals. Joakim Samuelsson, Uppsala University, Institute of Earth Sciences, Micropalaeontology, Norbyviigen 22, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. Introduction Neoproterozoic strata worldwide (e.g. Vidal 1976a; Vidal During the Neoproterozoic, the Baltica palaeocontinent 1981a; Knoll 1982a, 1982b; Vidal & Siedlecka 1983; underwent major sedimentological, tectonic and palaeo­ Knoll 1984; Vidal 1985; Knoll et al. 1989; Jankauskas et geographical changes (Kumpulainen & Nystuen 1985; al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 8: Graptolites and Trace Fossils
    Geos 223 Introductory Paleontology Spring 2006 Lab 8: Graptolites and Trace Fossils Name: Section: AIMS: This lab will introduce you to graptolites (Part A), and to a branch of paleontology known as ichnology (the study of trace fossils; Part B). By the end of Part A this lab you should be familiar with the basic anatomy of graptolites, and have an appreciation for how graptolites are used in the biostratigraphic zonation of the Lower Paleozoic. By the end of Part B of this lab you should be familiar with the basic ethological groups of trace fossils, and have an appreciation for how trace fossils can provide important paleoecological and paleoenvironmental information. PART A: GRAPTOLITES. Graptolites (Class Graptolithina) are an extinct group of colonial hemichordate deuterostomes, similar in morphology and life habit to the modern colonial pterobranch hemichordate Rhabdopleura. The graptolite colony consisted of many clonal zooids, each occupying a theca in the communal skeleton (the rhabdosome). The thecae formed in rows along branches of the rhabdosome called stipes. The rhabdosome was made of a non-mineralized, organic, non-chitinous protein called periderm. Graptolite colonies were either erect fan-like structures growing from the seafloor (most dendroid graptolites, ranging from the Middle Cambrian to the Late Carboniferous) or free-floating in the plankton (the commoner graptoloid graptolites, probably descended from dendroid ancestors and ranging from the Early Ordovician to the Early Devonian). Graptoloid graptolites are very important biostratigraphic zone fossils in Lower Paleozoic strata. 1 DENDROID GRAPTOLITES: A1: Dictyonema. Dendroid graptolite colonies formed fan-like structures with thecae-bearing stipes held apart by horizontal struts (dissepiments).
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH New Biostratigraphic Evidence of Late Permian to Late
    RESEARCH New biostratigraphic evidence of Late Permian to Late Triassic deposits from Central Tibet and their paleogeographic implications Gui-chun Wu1,*, Zhan-sheng Ji2, Wei-hua Liao3, and Jian-xin Yao1 1KEY LABORATORY OF STRATIGRAPHY AND PALAEONTOLOGY, MINISTRY OF LAND AND RESOURCES, INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, BEIJING 100037, CHINA 2CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, BEIJING 100037, CHINA 3NANJING INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND PALAEONTOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, NANJING, 210008, CHINA ABSTRACT Triassic deposits in the Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone are important for understanding its tectonic nature and evolutionary history, but have not been systematically studied due to a lack of biostratigraphic data. For a long time, the Upper Triassic Quehala Group featuring clasolite has been regarded as the only rocky unit. In recent years, the silicite-dominated Gajia Formation that bears radiolarian fossils was suggested to represent Ladinian to Carnian deposits. The Upper Permian and Lower Triassic rocks have never been excavated and thus are considered to be absent. This research, however, reveals that fossils aged from the Late Permian to Anisian of the Middle Trias- sic and Norian of the Late Triassic have been preserved in the central Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone, which provides evidence of Upper Permian to early Middle Triassic deposits and provides new insights on the Upper Triassic strata as well. A new Triassic strata succes- sion is thus proposed for the Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone, and it demonstrates great similarities with those from Lhasa to the south and Qiangtang to the north. Therefore, we deduce that the Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone was under a similar depositional setting as its two adjacent terranes, and it was likely a carbonate platform background because limestones were predominant across the Triassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Convolutional Neural Networks As an Aid to Biostratigraphy and Micropaleontology: a Test on Late Paleozoic Microfossils
    PALAIOS, 2020, v. 35, 391–402 Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/palo.2019.102 CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS AS AN AID TO BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND MICROPALEONTOLOGY: A TEST ON LATE PALEOZOIC MICROFOSSILS RAFAEL PIRES DE LIMA,1,2 KATIE F. WELCH,1 JAMES E. BARRICK,3 KURT J. MARFURT,1 ROGER BURKHALTER,4 MURPHY CASSEL,1 AND GERILYN S. SOREGHAN1 1School of Geosciences, The University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd Street, RM 710, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA 2The Geological Survey of Brazil–CPRM, 55 Rua Costa, S˜ao Paulo, S˜ao Paulo, Brazil 3Department of Geosciences, Mail Stop 1053, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA 4Sam Noble Museum, The University of Oklahoma, 2401 Chautauqua Ave., Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA email: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT: Accurate taxonomic classification of microfossils in thin-sections is an important biostratigraphic procedure. As paleontological expertise is typically restricted to specific taxonomic groups and experts are not present in all institutions, geoscience researchers often suffer from lack of quick access to critical taxonomic knowledge for biostratigraphic analyses. Moreover, diminishing emphasis on education and training in systematics poses a major challenge for the future of biostratigraphy, and on associated endeavors reliant on systematics. Here we present a machine learning approach to classify and organize fusulinids—microscopic index fossils for the late Paleozoic. The technique we employ has the potential to use such important taxonomic knowledge in models that can be applied to recognize and categorize fossil specimens. Our results demonstrate that, given adequate images and training, convolutional neural network models can correctly identify fusulinids with high levels of accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontology of the Bears Ears National Monument
    Paleontology of Bears Ears National Monument (Utah, USA): history of exploration, study, and designation 1,2 3 4 5 Jessica Uglesich ,​ Robert J. Gay *,​ M. Allison Stegner ,​ Adam K. Huttenlocker ,​ Randall B. ​ ​ ​ ​ Irmis6 ​ 1 Friends​ of Cedar Mesa, Bluff, Utah 84512 U.S.A. 2 University​ of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Geosciences, San Antonio, Texas 78249 U.S.A. 3 Colorado​ Canyons Association, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 U.S.A. 4 Department​ of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706 U.S.A. 5 University​ of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007 U.S.A. 6 Natural​ History Museum of Utah and Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, 301 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108-1214 U.S.A. *Corresponding author: [email protected] or [email protected] ​ ​ ​ Submitted September 2018 PeerJ Preprints | https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3442v2 | CC BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 23 Sep 2018, publ: 23 Sep 2018 ABSTRACT Bears Ears National Monument (BENM) is a new, landscape-scale national monument jointly administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service in southeastern Utah as part of the National Conservation Lands system. As initially designated in 2016, BENM encompassed 1.3 million acres of land with exceptionally fossiliferous rock units. Subsequently, in December 2017, presidential action reduced BENM to two smaller management units (Indian Creek and Shash Jáá). Although the paleontological resources of BENM are extensive and abundant, they have historically been under-studied. Here, we summarize prior paleontological work within the original BENM boundaries in order to provide a complete picture of the paleontological resources, and synthesize the data which were used to support paleontological resource protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossils, Rocks, and Time
    * W T' U.S. Department of the Interior / U.S. Geological Survey Fossils, Rocks, and Time ' Sfi 0. Front and back cover: This photographic collage of fossils shows the amazing diversity of plant and animal life on Earth over the last 600 million years. Fossils, Rocks, and Time by Lucy E. Edwards and John Pojeta, Jr. A scientist examines and compares fossil shells. Introduction e study our Earth for many reasons: to find water to drink or oil to run our cars Earth is Wor coal to heat our homes, to know constantly where to expect earthquakes or landslides or floods, and to try to understand our natural sur­ changing roundings. Earth is constantly changing nothing nothing on its on its surface is truly permanent. Rocks that are now on top of a mountain may once have been surface is truly at the bottom of the sea. Thus, to understand permanent. the world we live on, we must add the dimension of time. We must study Earth's history. When we talk about recorded history, time is measured in years, centuries, and tens of cen­ turies. When we talk about Earth history, time is measured in millions and billions of years. Time is an everyday part of our lives. We keep track of time with a marvelous invention, the cal­ endar, which is based on the movements of Earth in space. One spin of Earth on its axis is a day, and one trip around the Sun is a year. The modern calendar is a great achievement, developed over many thousands of years as theory and technology improved.
    [Show full text]