<<

Biostratigraphy

Geology 331 The Grand Canyon of the Colorado River in Arizona

Lithostratigraphic correlation between Grand Canyon, Zion, and Bryce Canyon national parks allows construction of a composite stratigraphic column. Lithostratigraphic correlation Grand Canyon, Zion Canyon, Bryce Canyon between Grand Canyon, Zion, and Bryce Canyon national parks Top of Navaho Ss. allows construction of a Top of Kaibab Ls. composite stratigraphic column. Zion Canyon National Park, Sedimentary Rocks Jurassic Navaho Sandstone, Zion National Park, wind-blown cross-bedding. Bryce Canyon, Utah, Cretaceous sedimentary rocks Correlation • Determination of the equivalence of bodies of rock at different locations. There are two kinds of correlation: • Lithostratigraphic - matching up continuous formations. • Chronostratigraphic - matching up rocks of the same age. Usually done with using . Correlation • Over short distances lithostratigraphic correlation is the same as chronostratigraphic correlation. • Over medium distances they are not the same. • Over long distances only chronostratigraphic correlation can be used. Original Lateral Continuity: permits lithostratigraphic correlation – note the continuous beds Lithostratigraphic and Chronostratigraphic Relationships Sedimentary facies, and their subsequent rocks, are usually time-transgressive.

http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/G331/lectures/331strat.html Sedimentary Facies Modern Barrier Island Time Lines

Sedimentary Facies in the subsurface Wire line logs Time Lines Modern Barrier Island

Sedimentary Facies in the subsurface

WireLewis line Shalelogs

Parkman Ss

Cody Shale Simple Lithostratigraphic Correlation: Facies Boundaries, not Time Lines Correlation Using Fossils Grand Canyon

Correlated Bed contacts Detailed lithostratigraphic correlation of the strata of the Grand Canyon. Note the facies interfingering.

Interfingering of strata due to shifting of facies during deposition

Zone of middle Cambrian Zone of early Cambrian trilobites Cambrian strata of the Grand Canyon: Note the two time lines from biostratigraphy.

Time lines established by biostratigraphy Depositional Model for the Cambrian strata of the Grand Canyon: Tapeats Sandstone, Bright Angel Shale, and Muav Transgression, regression, and stratigraphic cycles

1 4

2

3 Taxon Range Zone: Between a FAD and a LAD for a given species

http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/G331/lectures/331strat.html Concurrent Range Zone: FAD on Sp. D, LAD on Sp. B

http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/G331/lectures/331strat.html Interval Zone: Between two successive FADs or LADs

http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/G331/lectures/331strat.html Hedberg and Salvador, 1994 http://www.stratigraphy.org/ upload/bak/bio.htm Hedberg and Salvador, 1994

http://www.stratigraphy.org/ upload/bak/bio.htm

Ranges may or may not be concurrent. Hedberg and Salvador, 1994

http://www.stratigraphy.org/ upload/bak/bio.htm

Not commonly used.

Can be diachronous. Examples of Local Range Zones (connect the dots)

http://geoweb.princeton.edu/people/keller/deccan/large/Fig9_Gov_Q_biost_col.jpg geoweb.princeton.edu/.../massex.html Forams and Ammonites

Cretaceous based on and ammonites

http://paleopolis.rediris.es/cg/CG2009 _A03/CG2009_A03_Fig_01.htm Phylum Mollusca, Class Cephaplopoda, a goniatitic ammonoid with a simple suture pattern Phylum Mollusca, Class Cephaplopoda, a ceratitic ammonoid with a more complex suture Phylum Mollusca, Class Cephaplopoda, an ammonitic ammonoid with the most complex suture Trilobites are the best index fossils for the Cambrian. Taxon Range Zones in the Mississippian. range from to Triassic.

http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/Bulletins/165_1/index.html Examples of conodonts, the teeth of primitive chordates The conodont animal from the Mississippian of Scotland

1 cm Conodont Biozones for the Ordovician

http://australianmuseum.net.au/image/Stratigraphic- range-and-diversity-of-conodonts/ Conodont Biozones for the Ordovician

http://australianmuseum.net.au/image/Stratigraphic- range-and-diversity-of-conodonts/ Examples of Biozones based on Graptolites and Conodonts

Graptolites

Journal of Paleontology; January 2003; v. 77; no. 1; p. 146-171 Putting Radiometric Dates on Biozones: Previous Example from Radiometric Dating Lecture