The Middle Woodland Occupations of the Kankakee River Valley and Beyond

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Middle Woodland Occupations of the Kankakee River Valley and Beyond THE MIDDLE WOODLAND OCCUPATIONS OF THE KANKAKEE RIVER VALLEY AND BEYOND The Goodall Tradition Revisited and Reinterpreted William L. Mangold Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology Indiana University September 2009 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee Christopher S. Peebles, Ph.D. Dennis Conway, Ph.D. Anya Peterson Royce, Ph.D. Mark R. Schurr, Ph.D. Karen D. Vitelli, Ph.D. March 6, 2009 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Only in sports and politics is a single person credited for the success of an endeavor, even though that individual may have contributed only a small portion of what was needed. A relief pitcher may be called in at the start of the ninth inning and pitch one inning but is credited with the win. In football, the credit goes to the winning quarterback, even though there were at least several dozen other players that contributed everything from simply doing their job to intercepting what could have been a game winning touchdown. Considering the amount of time that has been devoted to this project, the list of individuals who contributed to its completion could actually run longer than the dissertation itself. While it is not possible to name them all, it does not mean that their help was unappreciated or unimportant. From the field school students and avocational archaeologists, especially those of the Northwest Indiana Archaeological Association, to all my colleagues who provided insights and prodded me to think beyond the boundaries, I am very grateful. Several individuals must, however, be singled out. First of all, my committee of Chris Peebles (Chair); Anya Royce; Karen Vitelli; Dennis Conway, all of Indiana University, and Mark Schurr of the University of Notre Dame deserves a great deal of thanks for steering this work towards a successful completion. Mark should especially receive a larger share of the pie. We spent a lot of time together in the fields along the Kankakee River and in the archaeology lab at Notre Dame. He was also always there, at the other end of cyber space, with guidance on a great number of concerns. iii Three people who were instrumental in its theoretical development and regional focus, but not members of my committee, were Elizabeth Garland, Janet Brashler and Ken Farnsworth. Betsy, Jan, and Ken, with their own research into the Middle Woodland and Hopewell, could always be counted on to encourage or restrain my new lines of thought. Larry Binn and his family of Wilmington, Illinois allowed me access to his collections and extensive knowledge of the archaeology of the lower Kankakee River valley. Without his help, the lower “K3” would still be terra incognita. Various museums, universities, government agencies, and institutions graciously provided access to their collections and records. The Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University, the Center for American Archaeology, and the Illinois State Museum allowed destructive analyses on ceramic sherds from various sites throughout the upper Illinois and Kankakee river valleys. Without this information, the degree of research on intersite relationships would not have been as complete. Dr. James Mills of DePauw University, Geology and Geography Department, conducted the physical processing of the ceramic thin sections and shared his knowledge of their contents. The Illinois Transportation Archaeological Research Program (ITARP) and the Spurlock Museum at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, allowed access to the archaeological materials from the Utica mound group. The U. S. Department of the Interior, Midwest Archaeological Center in Lincoln, Nebraska, shared important data on the archaeological investigations conducted at the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. The numerous members and attendees of the Midwest Archaeological Conference shared their ideas, concerns, and suggestions freely over the long life of this project. iv Then, there are the members of the Archaeology Section of the Indiana Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. Rick Jones, Amy Johnson, and all the others helped to hammer out the various theoretical problems with pointed debates over the dividers of our office cubicles. My brother Don spent many days with me in the vast number of fields we surveyed for potential sites. His knowledge of land surveying; outdoor skills, and his companionship were very valuable, then and now. The axiom of “Behind every great man, there is a great woman” could not be any more correct than in this instance. Over the years, my wife Kathleen was always there to encourage me when my resolve waivered and to put me back on track. She also accepted my absences for classes and field work. The typing and editing of the final text is the product of her skills. The completion of this work is as much her success as it is mine. Thanks, Hon. At the very beginning of this journey was my father Gordon. He encouraged my interests in ethnography and archaeology at a young age. Dad also supported my decision to enter graduate school to pursue those interests at a time in most men’s lives when major career changes were not encouraged. I wish that he had been alive to share in all that led up to this. Even with the help of all these great people, the theories and conclusions presented here, and any errors they may contain, are the sole responsibility of the author. v ABSTRACT William L. Mangold THE MIDDLE WOODLAND OCCUPATIONS OF THE KANKAKEE RIVER VALLEY AND BEYOND The Goodall Tradition Revisited and Reinterpreted The Middle Woodland period in the Midwest with its mysterious earthen mounds and highly-crafted artifacts has drawn the interest of collectors and archaeologists for centuries. One of the described Middle Woodland cultures in Michigan and Indiana was the Goodall focus, which was redefined into the Goodall tradition. However, additional questions remain. This research addresses such issues as subsistence and settlement patterns, internal and external social relationships, and if the Goodall traditional can be areally delineated. The Goodall tradition is a much smaller cultural expression than those found in the Illinois River valley. Its study, therefore, could shed insight into the activities of the larger Middle Woodland regional expressions. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number List of Figures .................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: The Project and Its Background ........................................................................1 Chapter 2: Physiography of the Study Area .....................................................................31 Chapter 3: The History of Middle Woodland Archaeology in the Kankakee River Basin and Adjacent Areas — The Early Years ..............................................74 Chapter 4: The History of Middle Woodland Archaeology in the Kankakee River Basin and Adjacent Areas — Modern Research ..........................................121 Chapter 5: Findings and Interpretations ..........................................................................162 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................228 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The Research Area ............................................................................................7 Figure 2. Environmental Zones in the Research Area ......................................................8 Figure 3. Entrenched Kankakee River Bed near Wilmington, Illinois ...........................37 Figure 4. Extent of Kankakee Marsh, c. 1897 ................................................................44 Figure 5. Duck Hunter, Boat, and Decoys in the Kankakee Marsh, c. 1900 ..................45 Figure 6. Poling a Boat in the Kankakee Marsh, c. 1900 ...............................................45 Figure 7. Dune Succession ..............................................................................................52 Figure 8. Young’s Map of Goodall Site and Mounds, 1948 ...........................................79 Figure 9. “Picasso Pot” from Mound 22, 12LE9 .............................................................82 Figure 10. Allman Mound (left); Franz-Green Mound (right) in the Upp-Wark Mound Group, Porter County, Indiana ...........................................................92 Figure 11. Allman Mound Profiles ...................................................................................93 Figure 12. Harvey Franz on Mound after Clearing, Franz-Green Mound, Porter County, Indiana ...............................................................................................94 Figure 13. Harvey Franz with Shovel Indicating Depth of Tomb, Franz-Green Mound, Porter County, Indiana ......................................................................95 Figure 14. Sketch of Tomb by Amos Green, Franz-Green Mound, Porter County, Indiana ............................................................................................................96 Figure 15. Modified Human Mandibles, Franz-Green Mound, Porter County, Indiana.............................................................................................................99
Recommended publications
  • Public Hearing, Report
    AGENDA ITEM ST. JOHNS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 Deadline for Submission - Wednesday 9 a.m. – Thirteen Days Prior to BCC Meeting 12/1/2020 BCC MEETING DATE TO: Hunter S. Conrad, County Administrator DATE: October 29, 2020 FROM: Justin Kelly, Senior Planner PHONE: 904 209-0728 SUBJECT OR TITLE: CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage AGENDA TYPE: Business Item, Ordinance, Public Hearing, Report BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Adoption of CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage, a request for a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use designation of approximately 1.16 acres of land located along Old Dixie Highway, north of Cross Ridge Drive and south of the Nocatee Parkway, from Rural/Silviculture (R/S) to Mixed Use District (MD). This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Agency at their regularly scheduled public hearing on November 5, 2020. Agency members voted 6-1 to recommend approval. 1. IS FUNDING REQUIRED? No 2. IF YES, INDICATE IF BUDGETED. No IF FUNDING IS REQUIRED, MANDATORY OMB REVIEW IS REQUIRED: INDICATE FUNDING SOURCE: SUGGESTED MOTION/RECOMMENDATION/ACTION: Motion to enact Ordinance 2020-_____, adopting CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage, a request for a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use designation of approximately 1.16 acres of land from Rural/Silviculture (R/S) to Mixed Use District (MD), based upon four (4) Findings of Fact, as provided in the Staff Report. Motion to deny CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage, based upon four (4) Findings of Fact, as provided in the Staff Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Kankakee Watershed
    Van Kankakee 8 Digit Watershed (07120001) Buren Total Acres: 1,937,043 Kankakee Watershed - 12 Digit HUCs Illinois Acres: 561,041 Indiana Acres: 1,371,490 Michigan Acres: 4,512 LAKE MICHIGAN Indiana Counties Acres s n i a Elkhart County: 7,287 o g Kane i n Fulton County: 1 i l h Berrien l c Cass Jasper County: 103,436 I i Kosciusko County: 32,683 M Lake County: D15u1P,6a3g8e LaPorte County: 298,166 Marshall County: 207,453 Newton County: 79,365 Porter County: 141,795 Pulaski County: 8,658 St. Joseph County: 175,401 Indiana 0201 Starke County: 165,607 Cook LaPorte 0202 Grey shaded 12-digit watersheds fall completely or 0207 0 2 0203 partially within Indiana. Shaded 12-digit watershed 0 St. 0403 4 0205 names and acres are on page 2. Joseph Elkhart 0208 0 0206 4-digit labels represent the last 4 numbers of the 4 0209 0406 02 12-digit watershed code. 0 0104 0 4 3 *Please note, all acres are approximate.* 1003 01 0 0302 0 0105 5 Winter 2013 1 0 10 0 0 4 6 0301 02 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0304 0 8 7 0102 Porter 0 1 0405 1 0 Will 1004 0 1 0303 8 0 1807 0 3 0101 Lake 4 8 0702 1308 0 0309 4 1007 8 0803 8 0 0 1 0 18 0703 11 1702 0 0 3 0307 1 0 0312 3 1 1 3 0 0 0701 2 1 0 1809 0 5 1306 1302 9 0308 1 0 2 5 0 5 4 1309 6 0704 0306 1 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0310 y 0502 8 0 1703 7 3 0 0 5 0705 0504 1010 0 d 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 8 n 3 1 0506 1 1 0 u 1 3 0 0603 0505 r 0 1 4 1305 8 1806 1502 8 1 30 0 G 1 6 0503 Marshall 1 0 1311 4 1 Kosciusko 1 0904 0501 1504 1 3 0604 0602 4 1 1604 3 0807 0 3 2 1307 1 4 1 0 0 Starke 8 2 8 0 3 9 0 4 1 0 1204 1101 0 9 1805 9 0601 1602 0 1803 1205
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Geological Process in Illinois Glacial
    INTRODUCTION TO GEOLOGICAL PROCESS IN ILLINOIS GLACIAL PROCESSES AND LANDSCAPES GLACIERS A glacier is a flowing mass of ice. This simple definition covers many possibilities. Glaciers are large, but they can range in size from continent covering (like that occupying Antarctica) to barely covering the head of a mountain valley (like those found in the Grand Tetons and Glacier National Park). No glaciers are found in Illinois; however, they had a profound effect shaping our landscape. More on glaciers: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10ad.html Formation and Movement of Glacial Ice When placed under the appropriate conditions of pressure and temperature, ice will flow. In a glacier, this occurs when the ice is at least 20-50 meters (60 to 150 feet) thick. The buildup results from the accumulation of snow over the course of many years and requires that at least some of each winter’s snowfall does not melt over the following summer. The portion of the glacier where there is a net accumulation of ice and snow from year to year is called the zone of accumulation. The normal rate of glacial movement is a few feet per day, although some glaciers can surge at tens of feet per day. The ice moves by flowing and basal slip. Flow occurs through “plastic deformation” in which the solid ice deforms without melting or breaking. Plastic deformation is much like the slow flow of Silly Putty and can only occur when the ice is under pressure from above. The accumulation of meltwater underneath the glacier can act as a lubricant which allows the ice to slide on its base.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Population Dynamics of Lake Sturgeon
    LIFE HISTORY AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF LAKE STURGEON, Acipenser fulvescens, IN THE MUSKEGON RIVER, MICHIGAN by Paul Joseph Vecsei (Under the direction of Douglas L. Peterson) ABSTRACT The lake sturgeon was once abundant throughout Lake Michigan with an estimated 11 million fish prior to human exploitation. By the early 1900s, however, most populations had been decimated by severe over-fishing and habitat degradation. Despite recent interests in restoring the species in Lake Michigan, little is known about the current status of remnant populations. The primary objectives of this study were to estimate annual spawning stock abundance and to identify potential spawning habitat for lake sturgeon on the Muskegon River, Michigan. To capture adult lake sturgeon, I used large-mesh, bottom-set gill nets deployed at the mouth of the Muskegon River from mid- March through May, 2002-2005. Radio telemetry was used to monitor seasonal movements and to identify likely spawning habitats. Sampling for larval lake sturgeon was conducted in May of each year using D-frame drift nets anchored in the mainstream of the river channel. During the 4 years of the study, I expended more than 5000 gill-net hours and captured 59 individual adult lake sturgeon. Larval lake sturgeon were captured in 2 years, suggesting that at least some natural reproduction still occurs. Habitat analysis revealed that the lower Muskegon River likely contains extensive reaches of potential spawning habitat for lake sturgeon. INDEX WORDS: Biology, population dynamics, habitat, lake
    [Show full text]
  • The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY CONTENTS Major-General John Campbell in British West Florida George C
    Volume XXVII April 1949 Number 4 The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY CONTENTS Major-General John Campbell in British West Florida George C. Osborn Nocoroco, a Timucua Village of 1605 John W. Griffin Hale G. Smith The Founder of the Seminole Nation Kenneth W. Porter A Connecticut Yankee after Olustee Letters from the front Vaughn D. Bornet Book reviews: Kathryn Abbey Hanna: “Florida Land of Change” Paul Murray: “The Whig Party in Georgia, 1825-1853” Herbert J. Doherty Jr. Local History: “The Story of Fort Myers” Pensacola Traditions The Early Southwest Coast Early Orlando “They All Call it Tropical” The Florida Historical Society A noteworthy gift to our library List of members Contributors to this number SUBSCRIPTION FOUR DOLLARS SINGLE COPIES ONE DOLLAR (Copyright, 1949, by the Florida Historical Society. Reentered as second class matter November 21, 1947, at the post office at Tallahassee, Florida, under the Act of August 24, 1912.) Office of publication, Tallahassee, Florida Published quarterly by THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY St. Augustine, Florida MAJOR-GENERAL JOHN CAMPBELL IN BRITISH WEST FLORIDA by GEORGE C. OSBORN Late in the autumn of 1778 Brigadier-General John Campbell received a communication from Lord George Germain to proceed from the colony of New York to Pensacola, Province of West Florida.1 In this imperial province, which was bounded on the west by the Missis- sippi river, Lake Ponchartrain and the Iberville river, on the south by the Gulf of Mexico, on the east by the Apalachicola river and on the north by the thirty-first parallel but later by a line drawn eastward from the mouth of the Yazoo river,2 General Campbell was to take command of His Majesty’s troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Snowmobile Trails
    Connects To Wisconsin Trails East g g Dubuque g Warren L E G E N D 26 Richmond 173 78 Durand E State Grant Assisted Snowmobile Trails N Harvard O Galena O on private lands, open to the public. For B ILLINOIS’ SELF-FUNDED 75 E K detailed information on these trails, contact: A 173 L n 20 Capron n Illinois Association of Snowmobile Clubs, Inc. n P.O. Box 265 • Marseilles, IL 61341-0265 N O O P G e A McHenry Gurnee S c er B (815) 795-2021 • Fax (815) 795-6507 TRAIL SYSTEM Stockton N at iv E E onica R N H N Y e-mail: [email protected] P I R i i E W Woodstock N i T E S H website: www.ilsnowmobile.com C Freeport 20 M S S The State of Illinois has adopted, by legislative E Rockford Illinois Department of Natural Resources I 84 l V l A l D r Snowmobile Trails open to the public. e Belvidere JO v action, a system of funding whereby snowmobilers i R 90 k i i c Algonquin i themselves pay for the network of trails that criss-cross Ro 72 the northern 1/3 of the state. Monies are generated by Savanna Forreston Genoa 72 Illinois Department of Natural Resources 72 Snowmobile Trail Sites. See other side for detailed L L information on these trails. An advance call to the site 64 O Monroe snowmobile registration fees. These funds are administered by R 26 R E A L is recommended for trail conditions and suitability for C G O Center Elgin b b the Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the snowmobile use.
    [Show full text]
  • State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures
    State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures Key Objectives State Parks Featured Students will understand some basic information related to the ■ Mounds State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2977.htm Adena, Hopewell and early Woodland Indians, and their connec- ■ Falls of the Ohio State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2984.htm tions to Mounds and Falls of the Ohio state parks. The students will gain insight into the connection between the Adena culture and the Hopewell tradition, and learn how archaeologists have studied artifacts and mounds to understand these cultures. Activity: Standards: Benchmarks: Assessment Tasks: Key Concepts: Mounds Students will research what was import- Artifacts Identify and compare the major early cultures ant to the Adena Indians. The students Tribes Researching SS.4.1.1 that existed in the region that became Indiana will then compile a list of items found in Adena the Past before contact with Europeans. the Adena mounds and compare them to Hopewell items that we use today. Mississippians Identify and describe historic Native American Use computers in a cooperative group groups that lived in Indiana before the time of to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.2 early European exploration, including ways that the era of the Adena to the rise of the the groups adapted to and interacted with the Hopewell Indians. physical environment. Use computers in a cooperative group Create and interpret timelines that show rela- to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.15 tionships among people, events and movements the era of the Adena to the rise of the in the history of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Archaeology
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 5 Number 2 2010/2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson Cathy L. Draeger-Williams Cathy A. Carson Wade T. Tharp Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy A. Carson, Records Check Coordinator Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. Mission Statement: The Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology promotes the conservation of Indiana’s cultural resources through public education efforts, financial incentives including several grant and tax credit programs, and the administration of state and federally mandated legislation. 2 For further information contact: Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology 402 W. Washington Street, Room W274 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2739 Phone: 317/232-1646 Email: [email protected] www.IN.gov/dnr/historic 2010/2011 3 Indiana Archaeology Volume 5 Number 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors of articles were responsible for ensuring that proper permission for the use of any images in their articles was obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Archaeology
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 6 Number 1 2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy L. Draeger-Williams, Archaeologist Wade T. Tharp, Archaeologist Rachel A. Sharkey, Records Check Coordinator Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D. Amy L. Johnson Cathy A. Carson Editorial Assistance: Cathy Draeger-Williams Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is gratefully acknow- ledged for their support of Indiana archaeological research as well as this volume. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. This publication has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service‘s Historic Preservation Fund administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. In addition, the projects discussed in several of the articles received federal financial assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund Program for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the State of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Hopewell Archeology: the Newsletter of Hopewell Archeology in the Ohio River Valley Volume 2, Number 2, October 1997
    Hopewell Archeology: The Newsletter of Hopewell Archeology in the Ohio River Valley Volume 2, Number 2, October 1997 1. Current Research at Hopewell Culture National Historical Park By Bret J. Ruby, Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, Ohio Archeological research is an essential activity at Hopewell Culture National Historical Park. An active program of field research provides the information necessary to protect and preserve Hopewellian archeological resources. The program also addresses a series of long-standing questions regarding the cultural history and adaptive strategies of Hopewellian populations in the central Scioto region. Presented below are preliminary notices of recent field projects conducted by park personnel with the assistance of the National Park Service's Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska. These recent efforts are focused on three Hopewellian centers in Ross County. Two of these centers, the Mound City Group and the Hopeton Earthworks, are administered by the National Park Service as units of Hopewell Culture National Historical Park. The third center, the Spruce Hill Works, is privately owned and is being considered for possible inclusion in the park. Research at the Mound City Group Work at the Mound City Group was prompted by plans to install a set of eight new interpretive signs along a trail encircling the mounds and earthworks at the site. Although the Mound City Group has been the focus of archeological investigations for almost 150 years, previous research has focused almost exclusively on the mounds and earthworks themselves (Figure 1), with little attention paid to identifying archeological resources that may lie just outside the earthwork walls. Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Wetland Assessment for Michigan: Section 1 Biological
    RAPID WETLAND ASSESSMENT FOR MICHIGAN SECTION 1: BIOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK Prepared by: Dennis A. Albert, Paul Adamus, David Campbell, John Christy, Joshua G. Cohen, Theadore Cook, Helen Enander, Linda Hardison, Michael A. Kost, Katie Mitchell, Jennifer Sackinger, and Bradford S. Slaughter Of: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Oregon State University, and Adamus Resource Assessment, Inc. For: Michigan Department of Transportation September 2008 Report Number 2008-06 Cover image taken by: D. Albert Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Literature Review........................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Field Sampling ............................................................................................................................................ 2 4.0 Plant Community Classification and Distribution Map Development ........................................................ 4 5.0 Quantitative Metrics for Wetland Quality, Function, and Value ................................................................. 5 6.0 Hydrologic Metric - Relationship to Plant Communities and Species ........................................................ 5 7.0 Characteristic Plant Species for Each Wetland Type ................................................................................ 10 8.0 Photos and Diagrams of Plant
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Trout and Salmon Stocking in Lake Michigan 1976-2002
    Lake Michigan Committee Meeting Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 19-20, 2003 Summary of Trout and Salmon Stocking in Lake Michigan 1976-2002 Prepared by Jessica M. Richards and Charles R. Bronte U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fishery Resources Office 2661 Scott Tower Drive New Franken, WI 54229 This report summarizes trout and salmon stocking in Lake Michigan from 1976-2002. Stocking information was provided by the Department of Natural Resources of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin, who stock Pacific salmon, brown trout, and splake, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who provides all lake trout for restoration purposes. These data should be considered provisional because not all agencies have officially verified the stocking numbers. With the exception of lake trout, no attempt was made to express stocking totals in yearling equivalents. Consequently, numbers for all life stages stocked for a given species were added together. To accurately examine trends in adult trout and salmon abundance in Lake Michigan, detailed information on hatchery programs, genetic strains, size at stocking, and stocking practices would have to be considered. Lakewide Trends: The number of trout and salmon stocked into Lake Michigan in 2002 totaled 12.0 million fish (Table 1), which was about 1.0 million fewer fish than last year. This level of stocking was 2.4 million less than the long term average of 14.5 million, and one of the lowest levels since 1977. Total stocking peaked at 17.3 million fish in 1984. Chinook Salmon: Chinook salmon stocking in Lake Michigan decreased to 3.3 million fish in 2002, which was about 1.0 million fewer fish than last year (Table 1).
    [Show full text]