International Meeting on Radio Aids to Marine Navigation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Meeting on Radio Aids to Marine Navigation 3 i INTERNATIONAL MEETING ON RADIO AIDS TO MARINE NAVIGATION. An International Meeting on Radio Aids to Marine Navigation was held in London from 7th to 27th May 1946. Delegates from the following countries attended : Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Eire, Finland, France, Greece, India, Italy, Netherlands, Newfoundland, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, U.S.A., U.S.S.R. and Yugoslavia. i Vice-Admiral J.D. Nares, the President of the Directing Committee of the International Hydrographic Bureau was invited to attend as an observer, and was present at three of the earlier meetings. The following extracts from certain papers read during the meeting, or presented thereat, are reproduced by permission of the Chairman, Sir Robert Watson-Watt, on behalf of the British Ministry of Transport and the Admiralty. J. D. N. FIRST SERIES. 1. A technical appreciation of the various Radio aids to Marine Navigation (Document No. 28). 2. Hyperbolic Navigation (Document No. 15). 3. Charts for Radar and position fixing Systems (Document No. 25). 4. Gee (Document No. 16). 5. Loran (Document No. 17). 6. Decca (Document No. 19). 7. Consol (Document No. 13). 8. P.O.P.I. (Document No. 18). 9. Corner Reflectors (Extract from Document No. 22). 1.—A technical appreciation of the various Radio Aids to Marine navigation. (Document No. 28) P art I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This document is based on the report of a technical committee representing the Government Departments concerned in the United Kingdom and their scientific research establishments. 2. It summarises the properties of those systems of radio navigational aids which have a possible application to marine use. 3. Part II summarises the principal characteristics o f the various systems. These are divided into two groups. T a b le i.— Systems o f known performance, i. e. those which are at present in use (such as Medium Frequency Direction Finding) and those which have been used in opera­ tions during the recent war. T a b le 2.— Other systems, i.e. those which have been used in experimental trials and those of which the general principles have been demonstrated or which exist only “ on paper ” , and for which the figures of performance are known incompletely. 4. Fuller details of the systems are given in Appendices 1 and 2. Appendix 1 gives further details of the system in Table I of Part II ; appendix 2 of those in Table II. 5. This document should be read in conjunction with document No. 8* which discusses the basic navigational problems to which radio aids are applied, and with document No. 30 which outlines the trends of development of radio aids to marine navigation. 6. Reference should also be made to document No. 29 which describes the problem» of frequency allocation which arise in connection with radio navigational aids, and document No. 34 which sets out the band widths desirable for each system. 7. No attempt is made in this document to discuss the economic factors which will affect the adoption of any particular system. P a r t II. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SYSTEMS OF RADIO AID TO MARINE NAVIGATION. 1. Tables I and II summarise the principle characteristics of the various systems. 2. In studying the tables the following Explanatory notes should be borne in mind. N o te i. An “ elementary ” system means the simplest version o f the system capable o f giving a position line only. N o te 2. All distances, except where stated, are in nautical miles (one nautical mile = 1.85 kilometer). N o te 3. Under “ Performance ” , the accuracy of the various systems is given on a statis­ tical basis. Under 50 % zone (columns 8 and u ) and 95 % zone (columns 10 and 12) are given the range of error or inaccuracy, within which 50 % and 95 % of all observations will lie. Except when stated, inaccuracies refer to a position line and not to a fix. N o te 4. In column 15, “ Possible marine use ” , the letters O, L, C and P have the signi­ ficance : O = Ocean aid ; L = Landfall aid ; C = Coastal navigation aid ; P = Pilotage aid. These terms are more fully discussed in document No. 8. N o te 5. The characteristics given in Table I relate to the systems as at present used. They take no account of possible modifications. The characteristics in Table II are in some cases conjectural. (*) Not reproduced. P a r t II. — TABLE I FIGURE IN BRACKETS REFER TO THE NAVIGATIONAL AIDS OF KNOWN PERFORMANCE (5) EXPLANATORY NOTES (Part II, pap. 2). 13 Ul OC U. O a. P MANCE FREQUENCY Power Is accuracy Possible of channels DAYTIME Reference BAND of NIGHT TIME REMARKS controlled required for mainly Marine Letter in SYSTEM GENERAL -.METHOD elementary transmitting on (General) system Limits of inaccuracy (3) by the Use GENERAL REMARKS system R a n g e ( 2 ) Limits of inaccuracy (3) Appendix 1 : (8 ) (9 ) R a n g e (2 ) Performances shipborne ( ) (4 ) 1 (over sea) (over sea) equipment 50 % Zone 95 % Zone 50 % Zone 95 % Zone (a) M.F. D/F shipborne Loop Type D/F » 300 miles 250-000 kc/s 1 1° 3» 25 miles 1° 3» Ground ray only Yes L. Reliable only within ground ray range. lb) M.F. D/F shorebased Adcock D/F 300-000 kc/s )) 1 1 5 00 miles 0.7° 2» 100 miles 0.7» 2» Applies to a No O.L. Two-way communication 1 0 0 -5 0 0 1.4» 4» good site channel necessary. miles over 5 00 miles 0.7» 2» (c) M.F. D/F shorebased Loop Type D/F Ou 300-000 kc/s 1 300 miles 0.7° 25 miles 0 .7 “ 2» Ground ray only No L. Two-way communication channel necessary. (d) ROTATING M.F. Rotating loop aerial 300 k c/s 1 1.5 kw. 300 miles 1“ 3° 25 miles 1» 3" Ground ray only • No L. BEACON C.W. or M.C.W. (e) GEE Pulse, time difference 20-85 Mr/s 1 3 00 kw. 100 miles 0.3 % 0.8 % Day and night No L.C. Range depends on height of (peak) of range of range the same transmitter aerial. ( 6 ) (7 ) (f ) STANDARD LORAN ;Pulse, time di(Terence| 1,750-1,950 k c/s 1 100 kw. 000 miles 0.2 % 0.6 % 0 -5 0 0 miles As for daytime (<’>) (7 ) No O.L.C. I (peak) or range of range 5 0 0 -1 ,2 0 0 0.3 °!o 0.9 % miles oï range of range DECCA I C.W. phase compar-compar­ 80-150 k c/s (8*) 2 ■ 2 kw. 300 miles 0.0 2° 0.05° 0 -7 5 miles Effectively as for day. Full perform ­ No O.L.C.P. ison. Multiplicity of Use as Ocean or landfall aid (C.W.) 3 0 0 -1 ,0 0 0 lower Init useful 7 5 -2 0 0 miles Appreciably poorer ance figures not awaits completely satisfac­ frequencies. miles accuracy obtainable over than for day. yet available. tory svstem of Lane Identi­ 200 miles Serious errors due to ( 6) (7 ) fication. Pilotage facilities possibility of “ lane limited to within about 50 slipping ” at ranges miles from centre of chain. over 250 miles. <h) CONSOL Mod. C.w. 200-500 kc/s 1 2 kw. 1,500 miles 0.2° 0.6» 2 5 -5 0 miles As for daytime At night bear­ No O.L. Minimum range or 25 miles Rotating- equisignal (C.W.) 3 0 0 -5 0 0 0.5» 1.7» ings are subject within which the system pattern. miles to bias as well cannot be used. as fluctuations shown. (7 ) (i) RADAR (shipborne) Pulsed radar, p.p.I. 9.000-10,000 1 30 kw. Minimum range = 50 yards. + 25 yards -<-5 0 yards On largest scale Yes C.P. Merchant ships radar to Ihe j to U.K. specification display: Mr/s ■(peak) Discrimination — 50 yards in range. 1» bearing accur­ U.K. specification. — = 2» in bearing. acy. (j > RADAR (shipborne) Pulsed radar, P.P.I. 9.000-10,000 1 30 kw. Minimum range = 500 yards. -+■ 100 yds On largest scale Yes C. Type of P.P.I. radar set at Type 268 display. Mc/S (peak) Discrimination — 200 yards in range. ' ± 3» bearing accur­ present on loan to merchant — — 2» in bearing. acy. ship. (k) RADAR BEACONS Pulsed responder 9.000-10,000 1 or 2 10 kw. Performance controlled substantially by the shipborne radar. No C.P. Requires additional receiv­ beacon. 150-200 Mc/s 30 watts ing equipment in the ships. (peak) ( ) LEADER CABLES ; L.F. Induction field 1 20 c /s — 5 k c/s 1 about Range of 400 yards off the cable. Course relative to the cable can be determined Yes p. Vulnerability of cable to 1 kw. to an accuracy comparable with the steering limitations. displacement largely over­ come by modern methods. OTHER SYSTEMS FIGURE IN BRACKET8 REFER TO THE P a r t II. — TABLE 2 EXPLANATORY NOTES (Part II, par. 2). 1 4 5 6 12 13 14 15, PERFORMANCE FREQUENCY No. Power Is accuracy Possible i of channels • of DAYTIlME NIGHT TIME REMARKS controlled BAND required for Marine ! GENERAL METHOD I transmitting mainly (General) elementary on GENERAL REMARKS system Limits of inaccuracy (3 ) Limits of Inaccuracy (3) by the Use system R a n g e (2) R a n g e (2 ) Performances shlpborne (8 ) (9) ( 4 (I) (over sea) (over sea) equipment 50 % Zone 95 % Zone 50 % Zone 95 % Zone Pulse, time difference 180 k c/s 100 kw.
Recommended publications
  • Handbookhandbook Mobile-Satellite Service (MSS) Handbook
    n International Telecommunication Union Mobile-satellite service (MSS) HandbookHandbook Mobile-satellite service (MSS) Handbook *00000* Edition 2002 Printed in Switzerland Geneva, 2002 ISBN 92-61-09951-3 Radiocommunication Bureau Edition 2002 THE RADIOCOMMUNICATION SECTOR OF ITU The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Inquiries about radiocommunication matters Please contact: ITU Radiocommunication Bureau Place des Nations CH -1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Telephone: +41 22 730 5800 Fax: +41 22 730 5785 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.itu.int/itu-r Placing orders for ITU publications Please note that orders cannot be taken over the telephone. They should be sent by fax or e-mail. ITU Sales and Marketing Division Place des Nations CH -1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Telephone: +41 22 730 6141 English Telephone: +41 22 730 6142 French Telephone: +41 22 730 6143 Spanish Fax: +41 22 730 5194 Telex: 421 000 uit ch Telegram: ITU GENEVE E-mail: [email protected] The Electronic Bookshop of ITU: www.itu.int/publications ITU 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. International Telecommunication Union HandbookHandbook Mobile-satellite service (MSS) Radiocommunication Bureau Edition 2002 - iii - FOREWORD In today’s world, people have become increasingly mobile in both their work and play.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary of the ICAO Position for ITU WRC-15 Radio
    Executive Summary of the ICAO Position for ITU WRC-15 Radio frequency spectrum is a scarce natural resource with finite capacity for which demand is constantly increasing. The requirements of civil aviation as well as other spectrum users continue to grow at a fast pace, thus creating an ever-increasing pressure to an already stretched resource. International competition between radio services obliges all spectrum users, aeronautical and non- aeronautical alike, to continually defend and justify retention of existing or addition of new frequency bands. The ICAO Position aims at protecting aeronautical frequency spectrum for all radiocommunication and radionavigation systems used for ground facilities and on board aircraft. The ICAO Position addresses all radioregulatory aspects on aeronautical matters on the agenda for the WRC-15. The items of main concern to aviation include the following: identification of additional frequency bands for the International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT). Under this agenda item, the telecommunications industry is seeking up to 1200 MHz of additional spectrum in the 300 MHz to 6 GHz range for mobile and broadband applications. It is expected that a number of aeronautical frequency bands will come under pressure for potential repurposing, especially some of the Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR) bands. Existing frequency allocations which are vital for the operation of aeronautical very small aperture terminal (VSAT) ground-ground communication networks, especially in tropical regions, are also expected to come under pressure. Due to decisions made by a previous WRC, this has already become a problematic issue in Africa. WRC-15 agenda items 1.1 and 9.1.5 refer; potential radioregulatory means to facilitate the use of non-safety satellite service frequency bands for a very safety-critical application, the command and control link for remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) in non-segregated airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • 187 Part 87—Aviation Services
    Federal Communications Commission Pt. 87 the ship aboard which the ship earth determination purposes under the fol- station is to be installed and operated. lowing conditions: (b) A station license for a portable (1) The radio transmitting equipment ship earth station may be issued to the attached to the cable-marker buoy as- owner or operator of portable earth sociated with the ship station must be station equipment proposing to furnish described in the station application; satellite communication services on (2) The call sign used for the trans- board more than one ship or fixed off- mitter operating under the provisions shore platform located in the marine of this section is the call sign of the environment. ship station followed by the letters ``BT'' and the identifying number of [52 FR 27003, July 17, 1987, as amended at 54 the buoy. FR 49995, Dec. 4, 1989] (3) The buoy transmitter must be § 80.1187 Scope of communication. continuously monitored by a licensed radiotelegraph operator on board the Ship earth stations must be used for cable repair ship station; and telecommunications related to the (4) The transmitter must operate business or operation of ships and for under the provisions in § 80.375(b). public correspondence of persons on board. Portable ship earth stations are authorized to meet the business, oper- PART 87ÐAVIATION SERVICES ational and public correspondence tele- communication needs of fixed offshore Subpart AÐGeneral Information platforms located in the marine envi- Sec. ronment as well as ships. The types of 87.1 Basis and purpose. emission are determined by the 87.3 Other applicable rule parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.110
    SUBCHAPTER D—SAFETY AND SPECIAL RADIO SERVICES PART 80—STATIONS IN THE 80.71 Operating controls for stations on land. MARITIME SERVICES 80.72 Antenna requirements for coast sta- tions. Subpart A—General Information 80.74 Public coast station facilities for a te- lephony busy signal. GENERAL 80.76 Requirements for land station control Sec. points. 80.1 Basis and purpose. 80.2 Other regulations that apply. STATION REQUIREMENTS—SHIP STATIONS 80.3 Other applicable rule parts of this chap- 80.79 Inspection of ship station by a foreign ter. Government. 80.5 Definitions. 80.80 Operating controls for ship stations. 80.7 Incorporation by reference. 80.81 Antenna requirements for ship sta- tions. Subpart B—Applications and Licenses 80.83 Protection from potentially hazardous RF radiation. 80.11 Scope. 80.13 Station license required. OPERATING PROCEDURES—GENERAL 80.15 Eligibility for station license. 80.17 Administrative classes of stations. 80.86 International regulations applicable. 80.21 Supplemental information required. 80.87 Cooperative use of frequency assign- 80.25 License term. ments. 80.31 Cancellation of license. 80.88 Secrecy of communication. 80.37 One authorization for a plurality of 80.89 Unauthorized transmissions. stations. 80.90 Suspension of transmission. 80.39 Authorized station location. 80.91 Order of priority of communications. 80.41 Control points and dispatch points. 80.92 Prevention of interference. 80.43 Equipment acceptable for licensing. 80.93 Hours of service. 80.45 Frequencies. 80.94 Control by coast or Government sta- 80.47 Operation during emergency. tion. 80.49 Construction and regional service re- 80.95 Message charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Region Spectrum Management Handbook
    ORDER SW 6050.12A SOUTHWEST REGION SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK (Date of Order to be entered at time of ASW-400 signature) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Distribution: A-X-5; A-FAF/AT-0 (STD) Initiated By: ASW-473 RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE NO. SW 6050.12A CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS OPTIONAL CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS OPTIONAL TO TO BASIC BASIC 12/12/01 SW 6050.12A FOREWORD The radio frequency spectrum is a finite, vital, and very limited natural resource available to all countries of the world. This international resource serves mankind in innumerable ways, and each country exercises its own sovereign rights in the use of the electromagnetic waves. Because the radio spectrum knows no bounds, its use cannot be restricted to individual countries. Requirements for use of this resource generally exceed the amount available; therefore, it is necessary that international, national, and regional spectrum management be rigidly practiced. The purpose of this spectrum management order is to present radio frequency spectrum information, guidance, and policy to those organizations using or administrating the radio frequency spectrum within the Southwest Region. Marcos Costilla Manager, Airway Facilities Division Page i (and ii) SW 6050.12A 12/12/01 Page ii 12/12/01 SW 6050.12A TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. ORGANIZATION, AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY 1. Purpose..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Distribution..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst L. Kramar Pioneer Award 1964
    Ernst L. Kramar Pioneer Award 1964 The Awards Committee of the IEEE Professional Technical Group on Aero- space and Navigational Electronics has named Ernst Ludwig Kramar as recipient of its annual Pioneer Award The naming of Dr. Kramar is principally in recognition of his technical contributions to development of instrument landing systems (ILS). The award is also a tribute to his inventiveness as applied to many other areas of radio navigation, including the Sonne (Consol) system and various types of radio ranges and direction finders. The state of perfection of present ILS is due to the contributions of many persons and organizations in various countries, dating back to the 1920's. Two important landmarks are due to concepts credited largely to him. One was the development of the first ILS operating completely at VHF; known as the "Lorenz System," it was the first ILS to be installed in numbers for opera- tional service at airports. The other was his later proposal for a way to replace the early constant-intensity type of glide path with an equisignal type, straight- line glide path. Details on the life and work of Dr. Kramar are given in the accompanying biographical sketch. D. G. C. LUCK, Chairman PTGANE Awards Committee PTGANE Pioneer Award Winner (With Historical Sidelights on ILS and Sonne) E RNST LUDWIG KRAMAR (SM'61) was born through development, to the stage of practical equip- on June 15, 1902, in the town of Kladno, near ment serving aviation on a wide scale. These involve Prague (at the time, Austria). He has been a Ger- contributions to instrument landing systems (ILS) and man citizen since 1932.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of Stations
    CLASS OF STATION FOR FIXED AND MOBILE NOTIFICATION Service code Station Description/Definition Fixed FX Fixed Station Station in the Fixed Service Station in the mobile service not intended to be used while FL Land station Generic Mobile in motion Station in the mobile service intended to be used while in MO Mobile station motion or during halts at unspecified points FB Base station Land station in the land mobile service Land Mobile ML Land mobile station Mobile station in the land mobile service FC Coast station Land station in the maritime mobile service FP Port station Coast station in the port operations service Maritime Mobile MS Ship station Mobile station in the maritime mobile service OE Oceanographic data interrogation station Oceanographic data interrogation station OD Oceanographic data station Oceanographic data station Generic FA Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile service Aeronautical mobile MA Aircraft station Mobile station in the aeronautical mobile service Aeronautical mobile Route FD Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile (R) service Aeronautical mobile Off FG Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile (OR) service Route RN Radionavigation land station Land station in the radionavigation service Generic Radionavigation NR Radionavigation mobile station Mobile station in the radionavigation service NL Maritime radionavigation land station Land station in the maritime radionavigation service Maritime Radionavigation RM Maritime radionavigation mobile station
    [Show full text]
  • Air Navigation in the Service
    A History of Navigation in the Royal Air Force RAF Historical Society Seminar at the RAF Museum, Hendon 21 October 1996 (Held jointly with The Royal Institute of Navigation and The Guild of Air Pilots and Air Navigators) ii The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright ©1997: Royal Air Force Historical Society First Published in the UK in 1997 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data available ISBN 0 9519824 7 8 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission from the Publisher in writing. Typeset and printed in Great Britain by Fotodirect Ltd, Brighton Royal Air Force Historical Society iii Contents Page 1 Welcome by RAFHS Chairman, AVM Nigel Baldwin 1 2 Introduction by Seminar Chairman, AM Sir John Curtiss 4 3 The Early Years by Mr David Page 66 4 Between the Wars by Flt Lt Alec Ayliffe 12 5 The Epic Flights by Wg Cdr ‘Jeff’ Jefford 34 6 The Second World War by Sqn Ldr Philip Saxon 52 7 Morning Discussions and Questions 63 8 The Aries Flights by Gp Capt David Broughton 73 9 Developments in the Early 1950s by AVM Jack Furner 92 10 From the ‘60s to the ‘80s by Air Cdre Norman Bonnor 98 11 The Present and the Future by Air Cdre Bill Tyack 107 12 Afternoon Discussions and
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 15-138 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 15-138 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz For ) GN Docket No. 14-177 Mobile Radio Services ) ) Establishing a More Flexible Framework to ) IB Docket No. 15-256 Facilitate Satellite Operations in the 27.5-28.35 ) GHz and 37.5-40 GHz Bands ) ) Petition for Rulemaking of the Fixed Wireless ) RM-11664 Communications Coalition to Create Service ) Rules for the 42-43.5 GHz Band ) ) Amendment of Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 90, 95, ) WT Docket No. 10-112 and 101 To Establish Uniform License Renewal, ) Discontinuance of Operation, and Geographic ) Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation Rules ) and Policies for Certain Wireless Radio Services ) ) Allocation and Designation of Spectrum for ) IB Docket No. 97-95 Fixed-Satellite Services in the 37.5-38.5 GHz, ) 40.5-41.5 GHz and 48.2-50.2 GHz Frequency ) Bands; Allocation of Spectrum to Upgrade Fixed ) and Mobile Allocations in the 40.5-42.5 GHz ) Frequency Band; Allocation of Spectrum in the ) 46.9-47.0 GHz Frequency Band for Wireless ) Services; and Allocation of Spectrum in the 37.0- ) 38.0 GHz and 40.0-40.5 GHz for Government ) Operations ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: October 22, 2015 Released: October 23, 2015 Comment Date: January 26, 2016 Reply Comment Date: February 23, 2016 By the Commission: Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners Clyburn and Rosenworcel approving and issuing separate statements; Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly approving in part and dissenting in part and issuing separate statements.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLE 1 Terms and Definitions
    CHAPTER I Terminology and technical characteristics RR1-1 ARTICLE 1 Terms and definitions Introduction 1.1 For the purposes of these Regulations, the following terms shall have the meanings defined below. These terms and definitions do not, however, necessarily apply for other purposes. Definitions identical to those contained in the Annex to the Constitution or the Annex to the Convention of the International Telecommunication Union (Geneva, 1992) are marked “(CS)” or “(CV)” respectively. NOTE – If, in the text of a definition below, a term is printed in italics, this means that the term itself is defined in this Article. Section I – General terms 1.2 administration: Any governmental department or service responsible for discharging the obligations undertaken in the Constitution of the International Telecommunication Union, in the Convention of the International Telecommunication Union and in the Administrative Regulations (CS 1002). 1.3 telecommunication: Any transmission, emission or reception of signs, signals, writings, images and sounds or intelligence of any nature by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic systems (CS). 1.4 radio: A general term applied to the use of radio waves. 1.5 radio waves or hertzian waves: Electromagnetic waves of frequencies arbitrarily lower than 3 000 GHz, propagated in space without artificial guide. 1.6 radiocommunication: Telecommunication by means of radio waves (CS) (CV). 1.7 terrestrial radiocommunication: Any radiocommunication other than space radiocommunication or radio astronomy. 1.8 space radiocommunication: Any radiocommunication involving the use of one or more space stations or the use of one or more reflecting satellites or other objects in space. 1.9 radiodetermination: The determination of the position, velocity and/or other characteristics of an object, or the obtaining of information relating to these parameters, by means of the propagation properties of radio waves.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Hyperbolic Navigation System
    A Report on Hyperbolic Navigation System Quiambao, John Vincent Roque, Rommel Sagad, Arjel San Pablo, Aldrin Seth Santos, Johan Christian INTRODUCTION Hyperbolic navigation system A navigation system that produces hyperbolic lines of position (LOPs) through the measurement of the difference in times of reception (or phase difference) of radio signals from two or more synchronized transmitters at fixed points. Such systems require the use of a receiver which measures the time difference (or phase difference) between arriving radio signals. Assuming the velocity of signal propagation is relatively constant across a given coverage area, the difference in the times of arrival (or phase) is constant on a hyperbola having the two transmitting stations as foci. Therefore, the receiver measuring time or phase difference between arriving signals must be located somewhere along the hyperbolic line of position corresponding to that time or phase difference. If a third transmitting station is available, the receiver can measure a second time or phase difference and obtain another hyperbolic line of position. The intersection of the lines of position provides a two-dimensional navigational fix .User receivers typically convert this navigational fix to latitude and longitude for operator convenience. HISTORY The theory behind the operation of hyperbolic navigation systems was known in the late 1930’s, but it took the urgency of World War II to speed development of the system into practical use. By early 1942, the British had an operation hyperbolic system in use designed to aid in long range bomber navigation. This system, named Gee, operated on frequencies between 30 MHz and 80 MHz and employed “master” and “slave transmitters” spaced approximately 100 miles apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Optical Ground Stations for Satellite Communication Kathleen Michelle Riesing
    Portable Optical Ground Stations for Satellite Communication by Kathleen Michelle Riesing B.S.E., Princeton University (2013) S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2018 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018. All rights reserved. Author............................................................................ Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 24, 2018 Certified by. Kerri L. Cahoy Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Certified by. David W. Miller Jerome Hunsaker Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Certified by. Sertac Karaman Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Certified by. Jamie W. Burnside Senior Staff Member, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Accepted by....................................................................... Hamsa Balakrishnan Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 2 Portable Optical Ground Stations for Satellite Communication by Kathleen Michelle Riesing Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 24, 2018, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Aeronautics and Astronautics Abstract Small satellite technical capabilities continue to grow and launch opportunities are rapidly expanding. Several commercial
    [Show full text]