April 2010 Quarterly Program Topic Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Analysis of Talk Shows Between Obama and Trump Administrations by Jack Norcross — 69
Analysis of Talk Shows Between Obama and Trump Administrations by Jack Norcross — 69 An Analysis of the Political Affiliations and Professions of Sunday Talk Show Guests Between the Obama and Trump Administrations Jack Norcross Journalism Elon University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications Abstract The Sunday morning talk shows have long been a platform for high-quality journalism and analysis of the week’s top political headlines. This research will compare guests between the first two years of Barack Obama’s presidency and the first two years of Donald Trump’s presidency. A quantitative content analysis of television transcripts was used to identify changes in both the political affiliations and profession of the guests who appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” CBS’s “Face the Nation,” ABC’s “This Week” and “Fox News Sunday” between the two administrations. Findings indicated that the dominant political viewpoint of guests differed by show during the Obama administration, while all shows hosted more Republicans than Democrats during the Trump administration. Furthermore, U.S. Senators and TV/Radio journalists were cumulatively the most frequent guests on the programs. I. Introduction Sunday morning political talk shows have been around since 1947, when NBC’s “Meet the Press” brought on politicians and newsmakers to be questioned by members of the press. The show’s format would evolve over the next 70 years, and give rise to fellow Sunday morning competitors including ABC’s “This Week,” CBS’s “Face the Nation” and “Fox News Sunday.” Since the mid-twentieth century, the overall media landscape significantly changed with the rise of cable news, social media and the consumption of online content. -
Video Games in the Supreme Court
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2017 Newbs Lose, Experts Win: Video Games in the Supreme Court Angela J. Campbell Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1988 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009812 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Angela J. Campbell* Newbs Lose, Experts Win: Video Games in the Supreme Court Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................... 966 II. The Advantage of a Supreme Court Expert ............ 971 A. California’s Counsel ............................... 972 B. Entertainment Merchant Association’s (EMA) Counsel ........................................... 973 III. Background on the Video Game Cases ................. 975 A. Cases Prior to Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n .............................................. 975 B. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n .......... 978 1. Before the District Court ...................... 980 2. Before the Ninth Circuit ....................... 980 3. Supreme Court ................................ 984 IV. Comparison of Expert and Non-Expert Representation in Brown ............................................. 985 A. Merits Briefs ...................................... 985 1. Statement of Facts ............................ 986 a. California’s Statement -
The Roles of Sonia Sotomayor in Criminal Justice Cases * Christopher E
THE ROLES OF SONIA SOTOMAYOR IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE CASES * CHRISTOPHER E. SMITH AND KSENIA PETLAKH I. INTRODUCTION The unexpected death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 20161 reminded Americans about the uncertain consequences of changes in the composition of the Supreme Court of the United States.2 It also serves as a reminder that this is an appropriate moment to assess aspects of the last major period of change for the Supreme Court when President Obama appointed, in quick succession, Justices Sonia Sotomayor in 20093 and Elena Kagan in 2010.4 Although it can be difficult to assess new justices’ decision-making trends soon after their arrival at the high court,5 they may begin to define themselves and their impact after only a few years.6 Copyright © 2017, Christopher Smith and Ksenia Petlakh. * Christopher E. Smith is a Professor of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University. A.B., Harvard University, 1980; M.Sc., University of Bristol (U.K.); J.D., University of Tennessee, 1984; Ph.D., University of Connecticut, 1988. Ksenia Petlakh is a Doctoral student in Criminal Justice, Michigan State University. B.A., University of Michigan- Dearborn, 2012. 1 Adam Liptak, Antonin Scalia, Justice on the Supreme Court, Dies at 79, N.Y. TIMES (Feb. 13, 2016), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/14/us/antonin-scalia-death.html [https:// perma.cc/77BQ-TFEQ]. 2 Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Appointment Could Reshape American Life, N.Y. TIMES (Feb. 18, 2016), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/19/us/politics/scalias-death-offers-best- chance-in-a-generation-to-reshape-supreme-court.html [http://perma.cc/F9QB-4UC5]; see also Edward Felsenthal, How the Court Can Reset After Scalia, TIME (Feb. -
Interview with Wolf Blitzer and Judy Woodruff on CNN April 13, 1995
618 Apr. 12 / Administration of William J. Clinton, 1995 because they thought he cared about them on the Republican agenda that has not either and that their future mattered in common. been defeated or passed, and also the unfin- They were Americans first. They were Amer- ished items on my agenda that will create icans first. That was his contract with Amer- more opportunity and more responsibility in ica. Let it be ours. this country. Thank you, and God bless you. Ms. Woodruff. But it's the Republican agenda. And I think itÐisn't it the case that NOTE: The President spoke at 1:14 p.m. at the throughout American political history, the ``Remembering Franklin D. Roosevelt'' 50th anni- party that is controlling the agenda is domi- versary commemorative service at the Little White House. In his remarks, he referred to Gov. nating the American political scene? Zell Miller of Georgia; Joe Tanner, commissioner, The President. Well, I don't necessarily Georgia Department of Natural Resources; agree that it's the Republican agenda. You Lonice C. Barrett, director, Georgia State Parks know, I brought up welfare reform before and Historic Sites; Anne Roosevelt, grand- they did. I started reducing the deficit long daughter of Franklin D. Roosevelt; and Arthur M. before they did and without any help from Schlesinger, Roosevelt biographer. them. We reduced the size of Government before they did. We reduced the burden of Interview With Wolf Blitzer and Judy regulation before they did. We gave relief Woodruff on CNN to the States from Federal rules before they did. -
August Sunday Talk Shows Data
August Sunday Talk Shows Data August 1, 2010 21 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 5 men and 1 woman Admiral Michael Mullen (M) Mayor Michael Bloomberg (M) Alan Greenspan (M) Gov. Ed Rendell (M) Doris Kearns Goodwin (F) Mark Halperin (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 4 men and 0 women Admiral Michael Mullen (M) Sen. Jon Kyl (M) Richard Haass (M) Thomas Saenz (M) ABC's This Week with Jake Tapper: 4 men and 2 women Sen. Nancy Pelosi (F) Robert Gates (M) George Will (M) Paul Krugman (M) Donna Brazile (F) Ahmed Rashid (M) CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley: 4 men and 0 women Sen. Carl Levin (M) Sen. Lindsey Graham (M) Dan Balz (M) Peter Baker (M) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 4 men and 3 women Sarah Palin (F) Sen. Mitch McConnell (M) Rep. John Boehner (M) Bill Kristol (M) Ceci Connolly (F) Liz Cheney (F) Juan Williams (M) August 8, 2010 20 men and 7 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 4 men and 2 women Carol Browner (F) Rep. John Boehner (M) Rep. Mike Pence (M) former Rep. Harold Ford (M) Andrea Mitchell (F) Todd S. Purdum (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 4 men and 1 woman Admiral Thad Allen (M) David Boies (M) Tony Perkins (M) Dan Balz (M) Jan Crawford (F) ABC's This Week with Jake Tapper: 5 men and 1 woman General Ray Odierno (M) Gen. -
Program Listings” (USPS James W
WXXI-TV/HD | WORLD | CREATE | AM1370 | CLASSICAL 91.5 | WRUR 88.5 | THE LITTLE PROGRAMLISTINGS PUBLIC TELEVISION & PUBLIC RADIO FOR ROCHESTER JULY 2016 THE 2016 NATIONAL CONVENTIONS This month PBS NewsHour combines forces with NPR to co-produce and simulcast coverage of the 2016 Republican National Convention July 18 – 21 in Cleveland and the 2016 Democratic National Convention July 25 – 28 in Philadelphia. The coverage will be co-anchored by Gwen Ifill and Judy Woodruff. NPR host Rachel Martin will report inside the hall with NewsHour’s Lisa Desjardins and John Yang and NPR’s Sue Davis. NPR’s Mara Liaisson, Ron Elving and Domenico Montenaro and NewsHour regular contributors including syndicated columnist Mark Shields, New York Times columnist David Brooks and Cook Political Report’s Amy Walter will also provide insight. REPUBLICAN DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION NATIONAL CONVENTION JULY 18-21 AT 8PM JULY 25-28 AT 8PM ON WXXI-TV & AM 1370 ON WXXI-TV & AM 1370 A CAPITOL FOURTH STATUE OF LIBERTY THE WHITE HOUSE: INSIDE STORY JULY 4 AT 8PM ON WXXI-TV JULY 4 AT 9:30PM ON WXXI-TV JULY 12 AT 8PM ON WXXI-TV THE MUSIC OF STRANGERS JULY 12 AND JULY 16 AT THE LITTLE THEATRE LET FREEDOM RING DETAILS INSIDE >> DETAILS INSIDE >> MONDAY, JULY 4 AT 6PM ON CLASSICAL 91.5 Never miss an episode of your favorite PBS show! WXXI PASSPORT is your ticket to all of your favorite PBS and WXXI content WXXI Passport is a new member benefit that provides members special access to current and past programs whenever and wherever you that have aired from both PBS and WXXI. -
Professionalism in War Reporting: a Correspondent's View by Tom Gjelten
Professionalism in War Reporting: A Correspondent's View By Tom Gjelten Carnegie Corporation of New York established the Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict in May 1994 to address the looming threats to world peace of intergroup violence and to advance new ideas for the prevention and resolution of deadly conflict. The Commission is examining the principal causes of deadly ethnic, nationalist, and religious conflicts within and between states and the circumstances that foster or deter their outbreak. Taking a long-term, worldwide view of violent conflicts that are likely to emerge, the Commission seeks to determine the functional requirements of an effective system for preventing mass violence and to identify the ways in which such a system could be implemented. The Commission is also looking at the strengths and weaknesses of various international entities in conflict prevention and considering ways in which international organizations might contribute toward developing an effective international system of nonviolent problem solving. Commission publications fall into three categories: Reports of the Commission, Reports to the Commission, and Discussion Papers. Reports of the Commission have been endorsed by all Commissioners. Reports to the Commission are published as a service to scholars, practitioners, and the interested public. They have undergone peer review, but the views that they express are those of the author or authors, and Commission publication does not imply that those views are shared by the Commission as -
Education Issue
march 2010 Education Issue Michael Bublé on Great Performances American Masters: I.M. Pei LEARNING IS LIFE’S TREASURE By partnering for the common good we can achieve uncommon results. Chase proudly supports the Celebration of Teaching & Learning with Thirteen/WNET and WLIW21. We salute all educators who dedicate themselves to our children. thirteen.org 1 ducatIon Is at the Our Education Department works heart of everything we year-round on a variety of outreach do at THIRTEEN. As a programs and special initiatives for pioneering provider of students, educators, and parents in New quality television and York State and beyond. Ron Thorpe, Vice web content, unique local President and Director of Education at Eproductions, and innovative educational WNET.ORG, offers an inside look at this and cultural projects, our mission is to vibrant department on page 2. enrich the lives of our community—from Our commitment to education extends pre-schoolers and adult learners to those into the community with Curious George who have a passion for lifelong learning. Saves the Day: The Art of Margret and This special edition of THIRTEEN— H.A. Rey, a fascinating exhibit opening our second annual Education Issue March 14 at The Jewish Museum. See —showcases some of our most exciting page 14 to learn about the exhibit, as well huschka educational endeavors. as special offers available exclusively to jane : : On March 5 and 6, the fifth annual THIRTEEN members. Celebration of Teaching & Learning comes Finally, we’re proud to launch our to New York City. The nation’s premier newly expanded children’s website, Kids llustrations I professional development conference for THIRTEEN (kids.thirteen.org). -
Criticism of the Supreme Court
Criticism of the Supreme Court Failing to protect individual rights (Page 1 of 2) Court decisions have been criticized for failing to protect individual rights The Dred Scott (1857) decision upheld slavery. Federal versus state power Plessy v Ferguson (1896) upheld segregation under the doctrine There has been debate throughout American history about the of separate but equal. boundary between federal and state power. Kelo v. City of New London (2005) was criticized by prominent While James Madison and Alexander Hamilton argued in the politicians, including New Jersey governor Jon Corzine, as Federalist Papers that their then-proposed Constitution would undermining property rights. not infringe on the power of state governments, others argue A student criticized a 1988 ruling that allowed school officials that expansive federal power is good and consistent with the "to block publication of a student article in the high school Framers' wishes. newspaper." The Supreme Court has been criticized for giving the federal Some critics suggest the 2009 bench with a conservative majority government too much power to interfere with state authority. has "become increasingly hostile to voters" by siding with One criticism is that it has allowed the federal government to Indiana's voter identification laws which tend to "disenfranchise misuse the Commerce Clause by upholding regulations and large numbers of people without driver’s licenses, especially poor legislation which have little to do with interstate commerce, and minority voters," according to one report. but that were enacted under the guise of regulating interstate Senator Al Franken criticized the Court for "eroding individual commerce; and by voiding state legislation for allegedly rights." interfering with interstate commerce. -
Ammast 03 Lettrhd Press 3 Holed
offset usage 4-color process Output is set for 2500dpi 450 West 33rd Street New York NY 10001-2605 thirteen.org press information AMERICAN MASTERS BRINGS BIG SCREEN MAGIC TO THE SMALL SCREEN WITH YOU MUST REMEMBER THIS: THE WARNER BROS. STORY Series from Thirteen/WNET Premieres This Fall on PBS AMERICAN MASTERS is produced for PBS by Thirteen/WNET The colorful 85-year legacy of Warner Bros. is documented in an unprecedented film project, New York AMERICAN MASTERS You Must Remember This: The Warner Bros. Story, narrated by Clint Eastwood. The five-hour film, a Lorac production in partnership with AMERICAN MASTERS and Warner Bros. Entertainment, premieres nationally, September 23, 24 and 25 at 9 p.m. (ET) on PBS (check local listings). The film is directed, written and produced by award-winning filmmaker and film critic Richard Schickel. Eastwood is executive producer. “I think it’s wonderful and fitting that Richard Schickel, who produced his first big series The Men Who Made the Movies for public television in 1973, is returning to public television with this project – the epic and historic and thoroughly juicy Warner Bros. story,” says Susan Lacy, creator and Executive Producer of AMERICAN MASTERS, a five-time winner of the Emmy Award for Outstanding Primetime Non-Fiction Series. Through movie clips, rare archival interviews, newly photographed material, and insightful on-camera discussions with talent such as Martin Scorsese, Steven Spielberg, George Clooney, Warren Beatty, Sidney Lumet, Jack Nicholson, and many others, You Must Remember This gives us the history of 20th century America on the big screen. -
Low Turnout in American Elections David Hill Bridgewater State College
Bridgewater Review Volume 20 | Issue 1 Article 5 Jun-2001 Low Turnout in American Elections David Hill Bridgewater State College Recommended Citation Hill, David (2001). Low Turnout in American Elections. Bridgewater Review, 20(1), 3-7. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol20/iss1/5 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. One aspect of the election, however, was remarkably simi lar to past elections. As with every presidential election since 1972 only about half of the eligible citizens actually cast a ballot. While final vote totals have yet to be confirmed by the Federal Election Commission, most estimates indicate turnout nationwide was somewhere between 50 and 52%, which is a modest increase over the 49% rate in 1996 (the lowest since 1924). While turnout indeed increased, this by no means suggests American democracy is on the mend. 2000 is simply another in a long line of low turnout elections since 1972. Given the closeness of the election, the low turnout is surprising. With so much in the balance and the intense focus of the media on the closeness of the election one would expect citizens to show up and participate in order to make a difference. Once again, however, students Low TURNOUT of political participation are left asking, why is turnout in American elections so low? In order to understand participation rates in the United IN AMERICAN States one must compare our turnout with that of other comparable democracies (See Figure 1) . Between 1960 and ELECTIONS 1995 turnout in 24 democracies without mandatory voting averaged 80% . -
FOCUS™ Edit Search
Home Sources How Do I? Site Map What's New Help Search Terms: "corporation for public broadcasting", "new york times" FOCUS™ Edit Search Document 4 of 34. Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times All Rights Reserved Los Angeles Times May 29, 2005 Sunday Home Edition SECTION: SUNDAY CALENDAR; Calendar Desk; Part E; Pg. 17 LENGTH: 1305 words HEADLINE: MEDIA MATTERS / DAVID SHAW; There's a 'nuclear option' for PBS' woes as well BYLINE: DAVID SHAW BODY: The growing controversy over the Bush administration's attempts to replace what it sees as a "liberal bias" in PBS programming with what would appear to be "conservative bias" has forced me to think the unthinkable -- or at least the heretical, certainly in my cultural/ideological circle: Do we really want or need PBS anymore? I am not defending the Bush administration's assault on PBS, which is as appalling as it is predicable, nor do I mean to denigrate the fine, often brilliant work PBS has done through the years -- "Masterpiece Theater," "Firing Line," "Bill Moyers' Journal," Ken Burns' epic documentaries on the Civil War, baseball and jazz, among many others. But when the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the parent of PBS, was created by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, we lived in a television world largely limited to three commercial networks, a world quite accurately characterized as a "vast wasteland" by Newton Minow, then chairman of the FCC. We now live in a cable world, a "500-channel universe," and while I would not argue that many of these cable offerings match PBS at its best, they (and Fox) do provide many alternatives to the three original networks we had in 1967.