2008–091.15 Mb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2008–091.15 Mb DIRECTOR'S MESSAGE The Department of Environment and Conservation’s (DEC’s) policies and operations need to be underpinned by the incorporation of up-to-date knowledge. The Science Division is DEC’s prime source of new conservation biology knowledge and information based on scientific research. With about 166 scientific, technical and administration staff, (excluding Perth Observatory staff) the division is the largest and most scientifically diverse group of conservation scientists in Western Australia. The Perth Observatory (10 staff), a program within the Science Division, focuses on delivering astronomy services in the areas of research, information and education. The conservation and land management work of the division reflects a significant investment by the State Government, through DEC, in multi-disciplinary biodiversity conservation research, monitoring and biological survey, and this year we formed the Biodiversity and Climate Change Unit (see page 59) to address an important emerging issue. Science, operational research and active adaptive management The Science Division carries out activities that deliver on-ground conservation and land management outcomes as well as generating new knowledge. The pie chart below shows that ~33% of the division’s staff time (F.T.Es) is committed to biological survey, taxonomy and plant collections management. These activities are fundamental to the mission of a conservation and land management agency such as DEC – if we don’t know what we have, where it is, why it is where it is and what condition it’s in, we can’t begin to manage it. A further 29% of staff time is committed to understanding landscape-scale ecosystem processes such as fire, introduced/feral animals/plants, altered hydrology, genetics, climate change, pests and diseases and timber harvesting. DEC invests in this research in order to develop credible, safe and cost effective methods for managing threats to the state’s unique biodiversity. Theatened species work, which accounts for ~19% of staff time, is mostly carried out in an active adaptive management (AAM) framework - a systematic process of modelling, operational-scale experimentation, monitoring and reporting – or learning by doing. In fact most of the Science Project Plans (SPPs) reported here are AAM plans. These projects not only advance an understanding of the ecology and biology of threatened species, but they actually improve their conservation status. For example, research on Gilbert’s potoroo over the last 3-4 years has not only advanced our understanding of the species’ biology, but has resulted in an almost doubling of the population of the world’s rarest marsupial. Because these programs are implemented in an AAM framework, we are able to understand cause-and-effect pathways and measure, document and report on the effectiveness of our actions to improve the conservation status of threatened taxa. About 8% of divisional staff time is committed to monitoring ecosystem process and reporting on resource condition. This includes monitoring associated with timber harvesting, salinity and altered hydrology, fire and natural variation, and about 11% of staff time is committed to information management including Florabase, Naturemap, marine and terrestrial baselining projects and database management. The division generates a substantial amount of information each year and we need to continue to improve our ability to manage and add value to this information if it is to be efficiently utilised. Associated with the activities reported here, Science Division staff spend a significant amount of time (~30% on average) providing policy, planning and general advice, participating on committees, on technology transfer and uptake and on other science extension activities within and external to DEC. 1 Survey, Taxonomy, Collections Threatened Species AAM Ecosystem Processes Ecosystem Monitoring Information Management 11% 8% 33% 29% 19% A breakdown of Science Division staff time (% F.T.Es) allocated to five broad themes important to delivering conservation and land management outcomes. This includes a proportional allocation of administration and library support staff time. Ecosystem Processes/Monitoring includes; fire, feral/introduced plants/animals, salinity/altered hydrology, climate change, pests and diseases and timber harvesting. Information management includes; Florabase, Naturemap, marine and terrestrial baselining projects and other database management. AAM = active adaptive management. In addition, ~5% of divisional F.T.Es are engaged in astronomy research, education and information. Communicating science Communicating what we do and what we have discovered is crucial to making a difference and for the on-going support of those who invest in research and who use science-based knowledge as a basis for decision making and on-ground management. As scientists we need to be good communicators for at least the following reasons: • Institutional: We have an obligation to the department, the government and the broader Western Australian community to generate and communicate new knowledge and information; it’s primarily what we are funded to do. Policies, procedures and prescriptions supported by good science and an informed community, enable DEC to do its job well and give politicians and the broader community confidence in us. Political and community support for the department and for science is crucial if we are to be successful. • Professional: As a scientist, it is a professional obligation to communicate new findings to other scientists, fellow workers and key stakeholders. It is also an important part of the process of critical peer review of what we, both as an agency and as individuals, produce. • Recognition: Through awareness, scientific research can be properly valued both by colleagues and staff in the department and by those who influence its funding. The role of science in shaping policies and practices needs to be made immediately apparent if it is to be appreciated. We must actively promote the good work we do and the important role it plays in underpinning biodiversity conservation and natural resource management in Western Australia. • Personal: A scientist’s reputation (and that of scientific institutions) is largely built on the quality and quantity of published work and the impact of this work. Personal rewards (beyond salary and career) include a sense of pride and achievement, recognition and respect by peers, job satisfaction and a greater likelihood of ongoing management support. 2 Communicating to politicians, practitioners, planners and other decision makers, as well as colleagues and the broader community requires a range of communication techniques. Important information needs to be communicated to the right people using appropriate means – one size does not fit all. The Science Division has developed a plan that sets out ways to communicate the work of the division to a diversity of audiences. The plan recognises three main audience groups – the science community, influential stakeholders (other than the science community) and the general public – each further sub- divided into several sectors. The science community is primarily comprised of our peers and colleagues in tertiary (and other) organisations and collaborative research agencies such as CSIRO, and our fellow scientists in DEC. Influential stakeholders include but are not limited to senior State Government scientific staff, WA’s Chief Scientist, scientific political advisors, funding agencies, funding decision-makers (internal and external), politicians, DEC staff in other divisions, local governments and representatives from the private sector. The general public includes the general community, media representatives, opponents, proponents, students, educators, environmental groups, community action groups, volunteers, Indigenous people and others. Communicating to these people/groups requires a variety of methods – including scientific publications (e.g. peer reviewed papers etc.), conferences, workshops, media coverage, internet, reports, articles in conservation publications, professional liaison, meetings, newsletters, brochures, educational packages, advertising, interpretive displays, open/field days and detailed briefings. It involves telling the story and getting the message across in different ways; at a high level, a low level, to small organisations, to large ones, to other departments, to the general public, to the media, to local communities, to the young and the old. The World Wide Web via the Internet has become by far the most powerful and far reaching communication tool. The Science Division will make a concerted effort to increase internet presence over the next two years. For example, the award winning NatureMap, compiled in collaboration with the WA Museum, is an ideal platform for making information about the State’s biota readily available. Another recent communication initiative that has proven to be very popular within DEC, and externally, is the new series of ‘Science Information Sheets’ that are posted on our internet site at: http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/science-and-research/publications-and-resources/factsheets-posters.html With regard to written products, it is pleasing to note a significant increase in output over the period 2008/09. This report (page 11) lists 431 publications, popular articles and unpublished reports across a diversity of topics and disciplines. The division also publishes two journals, Conservation Science WA and Nuytsia. One
Recommended publications
  • 5.4 Insect Visitors to Marianthus Aquilonaris and Surrounding Flora
    REPORT: Insect visitors to Marianthus aquilonaris and surrounding flora Nov 2-4, 2019 Kit Prendergast, Native bee scientist BSc First Class Honours, PhD researcher and Forrest Scholar On behalf of Botanica Consulting 1 REPORT: Insect visitors to Marianthus aquilonaris and surrounding flora Nov 2-4 2019 Kit Prendergast, Native bee scientist Background Marianthus aquilonaris (Fig. 1) was declared as Rare Flora under the Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 in 2002 under the name Marianthus sp. Bremer, and is ranked as Critically Endangered (CR) under the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN 2001) criteria B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v); C2a(ii) due to its extent of occurrence being less than 100 km2, its area of occupancy being less than 10 km2, a continuing decline in the area, extent and/or quality of its habitat and number of mature individuals and there being less than 250 mature individuals known at the time of ranking (Appendix A). However, it no longer meets these criteria as more plants have been found, and a recommendation has been proposed to be made by DBCA to the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) to change its conservation status to CR B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v) (Appendix A), but this recommendation has not gone ahead (DEC, 2010). Despite its listing as CR under the Western Australian Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, the species is not currently listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The main threats to the species are mining/exploration, track maintenance and inappropriate fire regimes (DEC, 2010). Fig. 1. Marianthus aquilonaris, showing flower, buds and leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No.4
    ISSUE NO. 0816-178X ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS Brachychiton & Allied Genera Study Group ~ewsletterno. 4 Welcome Vo newsletter no. 4. It's certainly been a while since the last one. I haven't answered many (or any) letters in that time either. The .."... reason is basically that my wife passed away at the start of the year. I now have two sons (& myself) to look after and I just don't get the time for native plants. I also found native plants were a refuge during my wife's illness. Now I have lost my interest in the plants and I feel a break of a year or two will do me good. Of course I'll keep my garden going (albeit full of weed;) .I'll also k&ep interesting planis growing (given to me now 'that I no longer propagate them) so. -please call in if anyone is passing through. ,' ... I . I will keep the study group going, however I am running out of + material. I am trying to cover the Rulingeas and Thomasias. This will take t while. I am collecting material and information at present (thanks mainly tc \ Gwenda McDonald and Dennis Margan). .I I have had visits by Dennis Margan, Bruce and Thelma Wallace and ' Ian Evans. Dennis seems to regularly travel up and down the coast. I'm not sure if he's looking for Goodenias or it's actually part of his work. - (Dennis psobably doesn't know the difference). Bruce and Thelma called in after a visit to Burrendong Arboretum.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuytsia the Journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 30: 309–316 Published Online 10 December 2019
    B.L. Rye & T.D. Macfarlane, A new name and a new subspecies for Isopogon (Proteaceae) 309 Nuytsia The journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 30: 309–316 Published online 10 December 2019 A new name, clarification of synonymy, and a new subspecies for Isopogon (Proteaceae) in Western Australia Barbara L. Rye and Terry D. Macfarlane Western Australian Herbarium, Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 Abstract Rye, B.L. & Macfarlane, T.D. A new name, clarification of synonymy, and a new subspecies for Isopogon (Proteaceae) in Western Australia. Nuytsia 30: 309–316 (2019). Isopogon drummondii Benth. nom. illeg. is lectotypified and replaced by the new name I. autumnalis Rye & T.Macfarlane while I. drummondii Hügel ex Jacques is recognised as a probable synonym of I. sphaerocephalus Lindl. The new subspecies I. sphaerocephalus subsp. lesueurensis Rye is described. Introduction This paper undertakes to settle the uncertainty around the name of a Western Australian species of Isopogon R.Br. (Proteaceae), the solution to which involves a second species, in which a new subspecies is recognised. In his treatment of Isopogon for the Flora of Australia, Foreman (1995) described one species as I. sp. A because he was uncertain whether the name I. drummondii Hügel ex Jacques (Jacques 1843) applied to it. A later-published name with the same epithet, I. drummondii Benth. (Bentham 1870), does apply to Foreman’s species A but cannot be used because it is an illegitimate later homonym. The name I. drummondii Hügel ex Jacques was not mentioned by Bentham (1870), possibly because it was published in a horticultural context.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Earthquakes in Western Australia Kevin Mccue Australian Seismological Centre, Canberra ACT
    Historical Earthquakes in Western Australia Kevin McCue Australian Seismological Centre, Canberra ACT. Abstract This paper is a tabulation and description of some earthquakes and tsunamis in Western Australia that occurred before the first modern short-period seismograph installation at Watheroo in 1958. The purpose of investigating these historical earthquakes is to better assess the relative earthquake hazard facing the State than would be obtained using just data from the post–modern instrumental period. This study supplements the earlier extensive historical investigation of Everingham and Tilbury (1972). It was made possible by the Australian National library project, TROVE, to scan and make available on-line Australian newspapers published before 1954. The West Australian newspaper commenced publication in Perth in 1833. Western Australia is rather large with a sparsely distributed population, most of the people live along the coast. When an earthquake is felt in several places it would indicate a larger magnitude than one in say Victoria felt at a similar number of sites. Both large interplate and local intraplate earthquakes are felt in the north-west and sometimes it is difficult to identify the source because not all major historical earthquakes on the plate boundary are tabulated by the ISC or USGS. An earthquake on 29 April 1936 is a good example, local or distant source? An interesting feature of the large earthquakes in WA is their apparent spatial and temporal migration, the latter alluded to by Everingham and Tilbury (1972). One could deduce that the seismicity rate changed before the major earthquake in 1906 offshore the central west coast of WA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013–142.05 Mb
    Department of Parks and Wildlife Science and Conservation Division annual research report 2013–14 DIRECTOR'S MESSAGE There has been much change since we became the Department of Parks and Wildlife in July 2013, with renewed focus on conservation of Western Australia's unique plants and animals and our world- class network of parks, reserves and natural areas. Our Strategic Directions for 2013-14 recognised that science and research play a critical role in effective management of species and ecosystems. In October 2013 the Science Division was amalgamated with the Nature Conservation Division providing new opportunities for science to more directly inform conservation policy and management, and for management requirements and knowledge gaps to set research priorities. While much of our work supports the conservation priorities of the Wildlife corporate goal, we also provide scientific research and information to support delivery of the Parks, Fire, Managed Use and People corporate goals. The combined responsibilities of the divisions are focused around two main areas of Species conservation and Landscape conservation. Our work in species conservation involves activities, such as species and community recovery, wildlife protection and licensing, understanding species biology and taxonomy, while our landscape conservation work is focused on landscape and seascape management, development advice and liaison, understanding ecosystem processes and biological survey. Information systems and monitoring and evaluation link across both species and landscape conservation activities. Across all areas, effective exchange of knowledge and information to support legislation and policy is fundamental to effective delivery of wildlife management outcomes. Partnerships have always been an important means of achieving our outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ericaceae Root Associated Fungi Revealed by Culturing and Culture – Independent Molecular Methods
    a Ericaceae root associated fungi revealed by culturing and culture – independent molecular methods. by Damian S. Bougoure BSc (Hons) Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Horticulture and Plant Sciences University of Western Sydney February 2006 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although I am credited with writing this thesis there is a multitude of people that have contributed to its completion in ways other than hitting the letters on a keyboard and I would like to thank them here. Firstly I’d like to thank my supervisor, Professor John Cairney, whose knowledge and guidance was invaluable in steering me along the PhD path. The timing of John’s ‘motivational chats’ was uncanny and his patience particularly, during the writing stage, seemed limitless at times. I’d also like to thank the Australian government for granting me an Australian Postgraduate Award (APA) scholarship, Paul Worden from Macquarie University and the staff from the Millennium Institute at Westmead Hospital for performing DNA sequencing and the National Parks and Wildlife Service of New South Wales and Environmental Protection agency of Queensland for permission to collect the Ericaceae plants. Thankyou to Mary Gandini from James Cook University for showing me the path to a Rhododendron lochiae population through the thick North Queenland rainforest. Without her help and I’d still be pointing the GPS at the sky. Thankyou to the other people in the lab studying mycorrhizas including Catherine Hitchcock, Susan Chambers, Adrienne Williams and particularly Brigitte Bastias with whom I shared an office. Everyone mentioned was generally just as willing as I was to talk about matters other than mycorrhizas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?
    The Little Things that Run the City How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, November 2015 Coordinating authors Luis Mata Christopher D. Ives Georgia E. Garrard Ascelin Gordon Sarah Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group Centre for Urban Research School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University 124 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 Contributing authors Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Melbourne in a Minute Scavenger’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2015) This artwork is a little tribute to a minute beetle. We found the brown minute scavenger beetle (Corticaria sp.) at so many survey plots for the Little Things that Run the City project that we dubbed the species ‘Old Faithful’. I’ve recreated the map of the City of Melbourne within the beetle’s body. Can you trace the outline of Port Phillip Bay? Can you recognise the shape of your suburb? Next time you’re walking in a park or garden in the City of Melbourne, keep a keen eye out for this ubiquitous little beetle.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report 0
    Department of Environment and Conservation and Environment of Department Department of Environment and Conservation 2008-2009 Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report Annual 2008-2009 0 ' "p 2009195 E R N M O V E G N T E O H T F W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Corporate Communications Branch, Department of Environment and Conservation. For more information contact: Department of Environment and Conservation Level 4 The Atrium 168 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Western Australia 6983 Telephone (08) 6364 6500 Facsimile (08) 6364 6520 Recommended reference The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Environment and Conservation 2008–2009 Annual Report, Department of Environment and Conservation, 2009. We welcome your feedback A publication feedback form can be found at the back of this publication, or online at www.dec.wa.gov.au. ISSN 1835-1131 (Print) ISSN 1835-114X (Online) 8 September 2009 Letter to THE MINISter Back Contents Forward Hon Donna Faragher MLC Minister for Environment In accordance with section 63 of the Financial Management Act 2006, I have pleasure in submitting for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report of the Department of Environment and Conservation for the period 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009. This report has been prepared in accordance with provisions of the Financial Management Act 2006. Keiran McNamara Director General DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 2008–2009 ANNUAL REPORT 3 DIRECTOR GENERAL’S FOREWORD Back Contents Forward This is the third annual report of the Department of Environment and Conservation since it was created through the merger of the former Department of Environment and Department of Conservation and Land Management.
    [Show full text]
  • From Mainland Southeastern Australia, with Ar
    © The Authors, 2018. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2018 Records of the Australian Museum (2018) Vol. 70, issue number 5, pp. 423–433. ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) https://doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.70.2018.1715 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:62503ED7-0C67-4484-BCE7-E4D81E54A41B Michael F. Braby orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-587X A new subspecies of Neolucia hobartensis (Miskin, 1890) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from Mainland Southeastern Australia, with a Review of Butterfly Endemism in Montane Areas in this Region Michael F. Braby1* and Graham E. Wurtz2 1 Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton ACT 2601, Australia, and National Research Collections Australia, Australian National Insect Collection, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia 2 Thurgoona NSW 2640, Australia [email protected] Abstract. Neolucia hobartensis albolineata ssp. nov. is illustrated, diagnosed, described and compared with the nominate subspecies N. hobartensis hobartensis (Miskin, 1890) from Tasmania and N. hobartensis monticola Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914 from northern New South Wales, Australia. The new subspecies is restricted to montane areas (mainly >1000 m) in subalpine and alpine habitats on the mainland in southeastern Australia (southern NSW, ACT, VIC) where its larvae specialize on Epacris spp. (Ericaceae). It thus belongs to a distinct set of 22 butterfly taxa that are endemic and narrowly restricted to montane areas (>600 m, but mainly >900 m) on the tablelands and plateaus of mainland southeastern Australia. Monitoring of these taxa, including N. hobartensis ssp., is urgently required to assess the extent to which global climate change, particularly temperature rise and large-scale fire regimes, are key threatening processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal, Qualifications and Employment History
    Jonathan Majer - Publications 16 Sept 2018 References marked so, can be obtained by citing reference number in an email to Jonathan Majer ([email protected]) or from DVD provided. Some others can be viewed or downloaded from Curtin eSpace on: http://espace.lis.curtin.edu.au/ Once eSpace is accessed, perform an Advanced search using ‘Majer’ as author. PDF files can be downloaded as required. References highlighted in green are not yet available as PDF files. 1. Books (refereed) Majer, J. D. (ed.) (1989). Animals in Primary Succession. The Role of Fauna in Land Reclamation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 547 pp. #B1 (PDF files available from Jonathan Majer) Agosti, D., Majer, J., Alonso, E. and Schultz, T., (eds.). (2000). Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Biological Diversity Handbook Series. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington D.C., 20+280pp. #B2 (PDF file available from Jonathan Majer) Delabie, J., Fernandez, F & Majer J.(eds.) (2012). Advances in Neotropical Myrmecology. Psyche 2012. #B3 (PDF file available at http://www.hindawi.com/journals/psyche/si/840560/) Gunawardene, N., Majer, J. D., Taylor, C. K., & Harvey, M. S. (eds.) (2013). The Terrestrial Invertebrate Fauna of Barrow Island, Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum. Supplement 83. 406 pp. #B4 (PDF file available from Jonathan Majer) Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.S.F. & Majer, J.D. (eds) (2015). Formigas Poneromorfas do Brasil. Editus, Ilhéus (Bahia), Brazil. 450 pp. #B5(PDF file available from Jonathan Majer)Link to chapters: http://books.scielo.org/id/m3gqd Agosti, D., Majer, J., Alonso, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park June 2011
    Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park June 2011 Eucalyptus socialis subsp. socialis / Eucalyptus leptophylla mid mallee woodland with Triodia irritans hummock grass understratum, Brookfield Conservation Park Acknowledgements TERN gratefully acknowledges the South Australian Department of Environment and Water for their assistance and support during the project and for allowing access to the park. Thanks also to the many volunteers who helped to collect, curate and process the data and samples. Lastly, many thanks to staff from the South Australian Herbarium for undertaking the plant identifications. Citation: TERN (2020) Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park, June 2011. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide. Contents Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park ........................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Accessing the Data ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]