sign in sign up
<<
Home , Action axiom, David Gordon (economist), Mises Institute, Walter Block

REFERENCES

Aebi, Magdalena. 1984. Kants Begründung der “Deutschen Philosophie”: Kants transzendentale Logik; Kritik ihrer Begründung. Hildesheim: Olms. Backhouse, Roger, ed. 1998. Explorations in Economic Methodology: From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. London and : Routledge Frontiers of 17. Blaug, Mark. 2006. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Explain. 2. ed. Reprint; Digital Printing. Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Block, Walter E. 1980. “On ’s ‘On Austrian Methodology’”. Inquiry 23(4): 397–444. ———. 2006. “Fanatical, Not Reasonable: A Short Correspondence Between and ”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 20(3): 61–80. Block, Walter E., and William Barnett. 2010. “Rejoinder to Hoppe on Indifference Once Again”. Reason Papers 32: 141–154. Boettke, Peter J. 1995. “Why Are There No Austrians? Ideology, Science and the ”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17: 35–56. ———. ed. 1998. The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Cheltenham: Elgar. ———. ed. 2010. Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Boettke, Peter J., and Christopher J. Coyne. 2015a. “Introduction: Austrian Economics as a Progressive Research Program in the Social Sciences.” In Boettke and Coyne 2015b, 1–10.

© The Author(s) 2017 129 A. Linsbichler, Was a Conventionalist?, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46170-0 130 REFERENCES

———. eds. 2015b. The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boettke, Peter J., and Peter T. Leeson. 2005. “Still Impossible After All These Years: Reply to Caplan”. Critical Review 17(1–2): 155–170. Boettke, Peter J., and Virgil H. Storr. 2002. “Post-Classical Political Economy: Polity, Society and Economy in Weber, Mises and Hayek”. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61(1): 161–191. Böhm, Stephan. 1990. “The Austrian Tradition: Schumpeter and Mises”.In Neoclassical Economic Theory, 1870 to 1930, edited by Klaus Hennings and Warren J. Samuels, 201–249. Recent Economic Thought Series 20. Dordrecht: Springer. Borges, Jorge L. 2000. “John Wilkins’ Analytical Language”.InSelected Non- Fictions, edited by Eliot Weinberger, 229–232. Penguin Book. New York: Penguin Books. Bühler, Axel. 2002. “Nutzen und methodische Eigenheiten rationaler Rekonstruktionen im Rahmen ideengeschichlicher Untersuchungen”. Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 11(1): 117–126. Cachanovsky, Nicolas. 2014. “Rejoinder to David Gordon”. https://puntodevis taeconomico.wordpress.com/2014/04/03/rejoinder-to-david-gordon/. Caldwell, Bruce, ed. 1984a. Appraisal and Criticism in Economics: A Book of Readings. Boston: Allen & Unwin. ———. 1984b. “ and Its Critics: An Appraisal”. History of Political Economy 16(3): 363–379. ———.1991.“The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes in Economics: Criticisms and Conjectures”.InEconomics, Culture and Education: Essays in Honour of Mark Blaug,editedbyGrahamK.Shaw,95–107. Aldershot: Elgar. ———. 1992. “Commentary.” In Caldwell and Böhm 1992, 60–65. ———. (1982) 2003. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London, Boston: Allen & Unwin. ———. 2009. “A Skirmish in the Popper Wars: Hutchison versus Caldwell on Hayek, Popper, Mises, and Methodology”. Journal of Economic Methodology 16(3): 315–324. Caldwell, Bruce, and Stephan Böhm, eds. 1992. Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Recent Economic Thought Series 30. Boston: Springer. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10650582. Caplan, Bryan. 1997. “Why I Am Not an Austrian .” http://econfa culty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/whyaust.htm. ———. 1999. “The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations”. Southern Economic Journal 65(4): 823–838. Carnap, Rudolf. 1936–1937. “Testability and Meaning”. Philosophy of Science 3–4 (4,1): 419–471, 1–40. ———. 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40. REFERENCES 131

———. (1932) 2004. “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache”.InScheinprobleme in der Philosophie und andere metaphysikkritische Schriften, edited by Thomas Mormann, 81–109. Philosophische Bibliothek 560. Hamburg: Meiner. ———. 2012. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Newburyport: Dover Publications. Cevolani, Gustavo. 2011. “Hayek in the Lab. Austrian School, Game Theory, and Experimental Economics”. L&PS – Logic and Philosophy of Science 9(1): 429–436. Chipman, John. 2004. “Slutsky’s Praxeology and his Critique of Böhm-Bawerk”. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 15(3): 345–356. Chodorov, Frank. (1947) 1962. “Taxation is Robbery”.InOut of Step, 216–239. New York: The Devin-Adair Company. Craver, Earlene. 1986. “The Emigration of the Austrian Economists”. History of Political Economy 18(1): 1–32. Cubeddu, Raimondo. 1993. The Philosophy of the Austrian School. London, New York: Routledge. Dekker, Erwin. 2016a. “Left Luggage: Finding the Relevant Context of Austrian Economics”. The Review of Austrian Economics 29(2): 103–119. doi: 10.1007/s11138-014-0295-3. ———.2016b.The Viennese Students of Civilization: The Meaning and Context of Austrian Economics Reconsidered. Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Di Iorio, Francesco. 2008. “Apriorism and Fallibilism: Mises and Popper on the Explanation of Action and Social Phenomena”. Nuova Civilta della Macchine 26(4): 5–32. Duhem, Pierre. 1991. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. 1. Princeton Paperback Print. Princeton Science Library. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. Ebeling, Richard M. 1990. “Introduction”.InMoney, Method, and the Market Process: Essays by Ludwig Von Mises, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, ix–xxvi. Auburn, AL: Praxeology Press of the Ludwig von . Egger, John B. 1978. “The Austrian Method.” In Spadaro 1978, 19–39. Fetzer, James H. 2000. “The Paradoxes of Hempelian Explanation”.InScience, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel, edited by James H. Fetzer, 111–137. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Foucault, Michel. 1994. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Vintage Books Edition. New York: Vintage Books. Friedman, David. 1988. “The Trouble with Hoppe”. 2(2): 44. Friedman, Michael. 2011. “Carnap on Theoretical Terms: Structuralism Without Metaphysics”. Synthese 180(2): 249–263. 132 REFERENCES

Friedman, Milton. 2001. Essays in Positive Economics. Nachdr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fuchida, M., & Okumiya, M. (1979) 1995. “Eine Niederlage und ihre Gründe”. In Der Zweite Weltkrieg (Bde. 3 - Von El-Alamein bis Hiroshima),79–89. Stuttgart, Zürich, Wien: Verlag Das Beste. Galbraith, John K. (1958) 1998. The Affluent Society. 40. Anniversary ed., Updated and With a New Introd. by the Author. Mariner Books. Boston, MA u.a: Houghton Mifflin. Gardiner, Patrick, ed. 1992. The Philosophy of History. [Reprint.]. Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Garrison, Roger W. 1978. “Austrian – a Diagrammatical Exposition.” In Spadaro 1978, 167–204. ———. 1992. “The Limits of Macroeconomics”. 12(1): 165–178. ———. 2001. Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. Foundations of the Market Economy. London, New York: Routledge. Gasparski, Wojciech. 2013. “ as an Ultimate Given: Ludwig von Mises’ Praxeology as Seen from a Business Ethics Angle”. Studia Humana 2(1): 3–14. Gasparski, Wojciech, and Tadeusz Pszczołowski, eds. 1983. Praxeological Studies: Polish Contributions to the Science of Efficient Action. Theory and Decision Library. An International Series in the Philosophy and Methodology of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 34. Dordrecht: Springer. Gordon, David. 1994a. “The Philosophical Contributions of Ludwig von Mises”. The Review of Austrian Economics 7(1): 95–106. ———. 1994b. The Philosophical Origins of Austrian Economics. Expanded Monograph. Stanford: Stanford University. ———. 2014. “Mises and the Diminished A Priori.” http://mises.org/daily/ 6711/Mises-and-the-Diminished-a-priori. Grüske, Karl-Dieter ed. 1996. Ludwig von Mises’‘Die Gemeinwirtschaft’. Faks.- Ausg Die Handelsblatt-Bibliothek “Klassiker der Nationalökonomie”. Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen. Hacohen, Malachi H. 2002. Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902–1945; Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. 1. Paperback ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hagemann, Harald, Tamotsu Nishizawa, and Yukihiro Ikeda, eds. 2010. Austrian Economics in Transition: From to . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Hahn, Hans. (1933) 1980. “The Crisis of Intuition”.InEmpiricism, Logic and Mathematics: Philosophical Papers, edited by Brian McGuinness, 73–102 Vienna Circle Collection 13. Dordrecht: Springer. Hajek, Alan. 2011. “Interpretations of Probability.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/. REFERENCES 133

Halvorson, Hans. 2012. “What Scientific Theories Could Not Be*”. Philosophy of Science 79(2): 183–206. doi: 10.1086/664745. ———. 2013. “The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic”. Philosophy of Science 80(3): 475–478. doi: 10.1086/671077. Hayek, F. A. 1943. “The Facts of the Social Sciences”. Ethics 54(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1086/290368. ———. (1937) 1948. “Economics and Knowledge”.InIndividualism and Economic Order,33–56. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ———. 1961. “The Non Sequitur of the ‘Dependence Effect’”. Southern Economic Journal 27: 346–348. ———. (1955) 1964. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. London: Collier-Macmillan. ———. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ———. 1980. “Preface”.InMethodological , 1. Bruxelles: Institutum Europaeum. ———. 1999. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ———. 2008. Prices and Production and Other Works on Money, the , and the , edited by Joseph T. Salerno: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Heath, Joseph. 2014. “Methodological Individualism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/methodo logical-individualism/. Hempel, Carl G. 1942. “The Function of general Laws in History”. The Journal of Philosophy 39: 35–48. ———. 1962. “Explanation in Science and History”.InFrontiers of Science and Philosophy, edited by R. Colodny, 9–19. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press. Hempel, Carl G., and Paul Oppenheim 1948. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”. Philosophy of Science 15(2): 135–175. Herbener, Jeffrey M. 1991. “Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School of Economics”. The Review of Austrian Economics 5(2): 33–50. Herbener, Jeffrey M., Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, Salerno, Joseph T. 1998. “Introduction to the Scholar’s Edition”.InHuman Action. A Treatise in Economics. The Scholar’s Edition. authored by Ludwig von Mises, v-xxiv, Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute. Holcombe, Randall G. 2014. Advanced Introduction to the Austrian School of Economics. Elgar Advanced Introduction. Cheltenham: Elgar. Hoover, Kevin D. 1995. “Why Does Methodology Matter for Economics?” The Economic Journal 105(430): 715–734. doi: 10.2307/2235030. 134 REFERENCES

Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1983. Kritik der kausalwissenschaftlichen Sozialforschung: Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung von Soziologie und Ökonomie.Studienzur Sozialwissenschaft 55. Opladen: Westdt. Verl.; VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. ———. 1995. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Auburn, Ala: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. ———. 1996. “Die Österreichische Schule und ihre Bedeutung für die moderne Wirtschaftswissenschaft.” In Grüske 1996, 65–90. ———. 2005. “Must Austrians Embrace Indifference?” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 8(4): 87–91. ———. 2010. A Theory of and Capitalism: Economics, Politics, and Ethics. The Ludwig Von Mises Institute’s Studies in Austrian Economics. Auburn, Ala: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Hudik, Marek. 2012. “Transitivity: A Comment on Block and Barnett”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 15(4): 456–462. ———. 2015. “‘Mises and Hayek Mathematized’: Toward Mathematical Austrian Economics”.InThe Next Generation of Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Joseph T. Salerno, edited by Per L. Bylund, David Howden, and Joseph T. Salerno, 105–122. Auburn, : Mises Institute. Hülsmann, Jörg G. 1999. “Economic Science and Neoclassicism”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2(4): 3–20. ———. 2001. “Garrisonian Macroeconomics”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 4(3): 33–41. ———. 2003. “Facts and Counterfactuals in Economic Law”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 17(1): 57–102. ———. (2002) 2003. “Introduction to the Third Edition: From Vale Theory to Praxeology”.InEpistemological Problems of Economics, 3rd ed., ix–lv. Auburn, AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. ———. 2007. Mises: The Last Knight of . Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Hume, David. (1748) 2008. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Reissued. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Iggers, Georg G. 1983. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present. Rev. ed., 1st Wesleyan pbk. ed. Middletown, CT, Scranton, PA: Wesleyan University Press. Ikeda, Yukihiro, and Kiichirō Yagi, eds. 2012. Subjectivism and in the History of Economic Thought. Routledge Studies in the History of Economics 146. Abingdon, OX: Routledge. Jasay, A. de 1991. Choice, Contract, Consent: A Restatement of Liberalism. London: IEA. Kaufmann, Felix. 1929. “Soziale Kollektiva”. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1: 294–308. REFERENCES 135

———. 1930. “Was kann die mathematische Methode in der Nationalökonomie leisten?”. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 2: 754–779. ———. 1944. Methodology of the Social Sciences. London: Oxford University Press. ———. (1936) 2014. Felix Kaufmann’s Theory and Method in the Social Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 303. Cham: s.l. Springer International Publishing. Kinsella, Stephan. 2001. “Against Intellectual Property”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 15(2): 1–53. Kirzner, Israel M. (1960) 1976. The Economic Point of View: An Essay in the History of Economic Thought. 2 edn. Studies in Economic Theory. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward. ———. 1996. The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. Foundations of the Market Economy Series. London: Routledge. ———. 1997. “Between Mises and Keynes – An Interview with Israel M. Kirzner”. The Austrian Economics Newsletter 17: 1. ———. 2001. Ludwig Von Mises: The Man and His Economics. Library of Modern Thinkers. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books. Klausinger, H. 2015. “Hans Mayer, Last Knight of the Austrian School, Vienna Branch”. History of Political Economy 47(2): 271–305. doi: 10.1215/ 00182702-2884333. Klausinger, Hansjoerg. 2006. “From Mises to Morgenstern: Austrian Economics During the Ständestaat”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9(3): 25–43. ———. 2011. “The Austrian School of Economics and its Global Impact”.In Global Austria, edited by Günter Bischof and Fritz Plasser, 99–116. s.l., s.l. Innsbruck and New Orleans: Innsbruck University Press/University of New Orleans Press. Knott, Adam. 2012. Praxeology and the Rothbardians. Kindle Edition. Adam Knot EBooks. Kotarbinski, Tadeusz. 1965. Praxeology – An Introduction to the Sciences of Efficient Action. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2001. “On Rationality, Ideal Types and Economics: Alfred Schütz and the Austrian School”. The Review of Austrian Economics 14(2/3): 119–143. ———. 2003. “The Viennese Connection: Alfred Schutz and the Austrian School”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6(2): 35–67. Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1977. Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process: Essays on the Theory of the Market Economy, edited by Ludwig M. Lachmann and Walter E. Grinder. Studies in Economic Theory. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel. 136 REFERENCES

Lakatos, Imre. 1999. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Reprint. edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie, Philosophical papers/Imre Lakatos. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lavoie, Don. 1986. “Euclideanism Versus Hermeneutics: A Reinterpretation of Misesian Apriorism”.InSubjectivity, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding, edited by Israel M. Kirzner, 192–210. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Leeson, Peter T., and Peter J. Boettke. 2006. “Was Mises Right?”. Review of Social Economy 64(2): 247–265. doi: 10.1080/00346760600721163. Leube, Kurt R. 1995. “Bemerkungen zur methodologischen Position der Österreichischen Schule der Nationalökonomie innerhalb der Sozialwissen-schaf- ten”.InKrise und Exodus: Österreichische Sozialwissenschaften in Mitteleuropa, edited by Kurt R. Leube and Andreas Pribersky, 23–37. Wien: WUV-Univ.-Verl. ———. 2010. “On Menger, Hayek and on the Concept of ‘Verstehen’.” In Hagemann, Nishizawa, and Ikeda 2010, 257–275. Lewis, Paul. 2010. “Certainly Not! A Critical Realist Recasting of Ludwig Von Mises’s Methodology of the Social Sciences”. Journal of Economic Methodology 17(3): 277–299. Linsbichler, Alexander. 2015. “Otto Neurath and Ludwig von Mises – The Socialist Calculation Debates and Beyond”.InInteractions in the History of Philosophy II, edited by Ercan, Burçin, 311–324. Istanbul: Delta Publishing. Long, Roderick T. 2001. “The Benefits and Hazards of Dialectical ”. Journal of Studies 2(2): 395–448. ———. 2002. “Keeping Context in Context: The Limits of Dialectics”. Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3(2): 401–422. ———. 2004. “Anti-Psychologism in Economics: Wittgenstein and Mises”. The Review of Austrian Economics 17(4): 345–369. ———. 2006. “Realism and Abstraction in Economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9(3): 3–23. ———. 2008. “Wittgenstein, Praxeology, and Frege’s Three Realms. Wirth Conference on What Is Austrian”. In Austrian Economics, 2008. ———. 2013. Wittgenstein, Austrian Economics, and the Logic of Action – Praxeological Investigations. Auburn, AL: Routledge. ———. 2014. “R.G.Collingwood: Historicist or Praxeologist?” https://mises. org/pdf/asc/2003/asc9long.pdf. Luhmann, Niklas. 2005. Social Systems. Reprinted. Writing Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. ———. 2012. Theory of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. ———. 2013. Theory of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Lutz, Sebastian. 2012. “On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science: A Defense of the Received View”. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2(1): 77–120. doi: 10.1086/664460. REFERENCES 137

———. 2014. “What’s Right with a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models?” Erkenn 79(S8): 1475–1492. doi: 10.1007/s10670-013-9578-5. Lyon, Aidan. 2010. “Philosophy of Probability”.InPhilosophies of the Sciences: A Guide, edited by Fritz Allhoff, 92–125. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Machlup, Fritz. 1978. “The Universal Bogey: Economic Man”.InMethodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences,283–301. New York: Academic Press. Mäki, Uskali. 1992. “The Market as an Isolated Causal Process: A Metaphysical Ground for Realism.” In Caldwell and Böhm 1992, 35–66. ———. ed. 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press. McCaffrey, M. 2014. “Mises and Schumpeter: Friendly Rivals?” http://mises. org/daily/6659/Mises-and-Schumpeter-Friendly-Rivals. McElroy, Wendy. 2003. Debates of Liberty: An Overview of Individualist , 1881–1908. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. McFalls, Laurence H. 2007. “The ‘Objectivist’ Ethic and the ‘Spirit’ of Science”.In ’s ‘Objectivity’ Reconsidered, edited by Laurence H. McFalls, 351–373. German and European Studies. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. Menger, Carl. (1883) 1985. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York: New York University Press. Menger, Karl. (1936) 1979. “Remarks on the Law of Diminishing Returns: A Study in Meta-Economics”.InSelected Papers in Logic and Foundations, Didactics, Economics, Vienna Circle Collection 10. Dordrecht: Springer. Milford, Karl. 1986. “Zu den Lösungsversuchen des Induktionsproblems und des Abgrenzungsproblems bei Carl Menger.” Dissertation, University of Vienna. ———. 1989. Zu den Lösungsversuchen des Induktionsproblems und des Abgrenzungsproblems bei Carl Menger. Sitzungsberichte/Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 541. Wien: Verl. d. Österreich. Akad. d. Wiss. ———. 1992a. “Nationalism, Volksgeist, and the Methods of Economics: A Note on Ranke, Roscher, and Menger”. History of European Ideas 15: 163–170. ———. 1992b. “‘Poppers Lösungsvorschlag des Abgrenzungsproblems und die Methoden der Sozialwissenschaften: Zum 90’. Geburtstag von Sir Karl Popper”. Wissenschaftspolitische Blätter 4: 503–513. ———. 1995. “Roscher’s Epistemological and Methodological Position – Its Importance for the ”. Journal of Economic Studies 22(3/4/5): 26–52. ———. 1997. “Hufeland als Vorläufer von Menger und Hayek”.InWert, Meinung, Bedeutung: Die Tradition der subjektiven Wertlehre in der deutschen Nationalökonomie vor Menger, edited by Birger P. Priddat, 89–160 Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschsprachigen Ökonomie 3. Marburg: Metropolis-Verl. 138 REFERENCES

———. 2002. “Auf der Suche nach sicherem Wissen: Zur Wissenschaftstheorie von J.S.Mill”.InStudien zur Entwicklung der oekonomischen Theorie XIX, edited by Erich Streissler. Berlin: Duncker&Humblot. ———. 2004. “Inductivism in 19th Century German Economics”.InInduction and Deduction in the Sciences, edited by Friedrich Stadler, 273–292. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, Institut ‘Wiener Kreis’ Society for the Advancement of the Scientific World Conception 11. Dordrecht: Springer. ———. 2008. “Inductivism and Anti-Essentialism in Menger’s Work”.InCarl Menger: Neu Erörtert Unter Einbeziehung Nachgelassener Texte, edited by Gilles Campagnolo and Stephan Haltmayer, 59–86. Wiener Arbeiten zur Philosophie Reihe B, Beiträge zur philosophischen Forschung 17, Lang: Frankfurt am Main. ———. 2010. “ANoteonMenger’s Problem Situation and Non-Essentialist Approach to Economics.” In Hagemann, Nishizawa, and Ikeda 2010, 154–175. ———.2015.“Zur Entwicklung der Volkswirtschaftslehre an der Universität Wien von1763bis1976”.InReflexive Innensichten aus der Universität: Disziplinengeschichten zwischen Wissenschaft, Gesellschaft und Politik, edited by Karl Fröschl, Gerd B. Müller, Thomas Olechowski, and Brigitta Schmidt-Lauber, 341–354 650 Jahre Universität Wien – Aufbruch ins neue Jahrhundert; Bd. 4. Göttingen: V&R unipress. Milford, Karl, and M. Cerman 2011. “Scheinsatzpositionen als Begründungsversuche der theoretischen Ökonomie: Schumpeters ‘Das Wesen und der hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie’”.InDie vielen Gesichter des wirtschaftlichen Wandels: Beiträge zur Innovationsgeschichte. Festschrift für Dieter Stiefel, edited by P. Berger, P. Eigner, and A. Resch, 55–82. Wien: LIT-Verlag. Milford, Karl, and Peter Rosner. 1997. “Die Abkoppelung der Ökonomie an der Universität Wien nach 1920”.InZur deutschsprachigen wirtschaftswissenschaf- tlichen Emigration nach 1933, edited by Harald Hagemann, 479–502. Marbug: Metropolis-Verlag. Miller, David W. 1994. Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence. Chicago: Open Court. Milonakis, Dimitris, and Ben Fine. 2009. From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. Economics as Social Theory. London, New York: Routledge. Mises, Ludwig von. 1920. “Zu Karl Mengers achtzigstem Geburtstag”. Neues Wiener Tagblatt, February 22: 52. ———. 1929. “Karl Menger und die Österreichische Schule der Nationalökonomie – Anlässlich der Enthüllung des Denkmals an der Universität”. Neue Freie Presse, January 29(23123): 23124. ———. 1933. Grundprobleme der Nationalökonomie: Untersuchungen über Verfahren, Aufgaben und Inhalt der Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftslehre. Jena: Gustav Fischer. REFERENCES 139

———. 1937. “Die österreichische Schule der Nationalökonomie”. Der Wirtschafter – Informationsblatt für Finanz, Handel und Industrie 17: 316–317. ———. 1940. Nationalökonomie: Theorie des Handelns und Wirtschaftens. Genf: Editions Union. ———. 1968. Positivism: A Study in Human Understanding. Unabridged republ. Dover Books on Philosophy. New York: Dover Publ. ———. 1976. My Years with Ludwig von Mises. New Rochelle: Arlington House Publishers. ———. (1953) 1977. “Comments About the Mathematical Treatment of Economic Problems”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1(2): 97–100. ———. 1978. Erinnerungen: Mit 1 Porträt und einer Bibliographie der Veröffentlichungen von Ludwig v. Mises.1.Aufl. Stuttgart, NY: Fischer. ———. (1927) 1985. Liberalism: In the Classical Tradition. 3rd edn. Irvington- on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education. ———. (1962) 1990. “Epistemological Relativism in the Sciences of Human Action”.InMoney, Method, and the Market Process: Essays by Ludwig Von Mises, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, 37–51. Auburn, AL: Praxeology Press of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. 1990. Money, Method, and the Market Process: Essays by Ludwig Von Mises, edited by Richard M. Ebeling. Auburn, AL: Praxeology Press of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. (1942) 1990. “Social Science and Natural Science”.InMoney, Method, and the Market Process: Essays by Ludwig Von Mises, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, 3–15. Auburn, AL: Praxeology Press of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. (1944) 1990a. “The Treatment of ‘Irrationality’ in the Social Sciences”. In Money, Method, and the Market Process: Essays by Ludwig Von Mises, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, 16–36. Auburn, AL: Praxeology Press of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. (1944) 1990b. “The Treatment of ‘Irrationality’ in the Social Sciences”. In Money, Method, and the Market Process: Essays by Ludwig Von Mises, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, 16–36. Auburn, AL: Praxeology Press of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. (1949) 1998. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. The Scholar’s Edition. Auburn, AL: The Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. 2002. Between the Two World Wars: Monetary Disorder, Interventionism, Socialism, and the , edited by Richard M. Ebeling. Selected writings of Ludwig von Mises/ed. and with an introd. by Richard M. Ebeling; Vol. 2. Indianapolis, IN: . ———. (1937) 2002. “The Logical Character of the Science of Human Action”. In Between the Two World Wars: Monetary Disorder, Interventionism, Socialism, and the Great Depression, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, 341–347. Selected 140 REFERENCES

writings of Ludwig von Mises/ed. and with an introd. by Richard M. Ebeling; Vol. 2. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. ———. (1933) 2002. “The Logical Problem of Economics”.InBetween the Two World Wars: Monetary Disorder, Interventionism, Socialism, and the Great Depression, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, 335–340. Selected writings of Ludwig von Mises /ed. and with an introd. by Richard M. Ebeling; Vol. 2. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. ———. (1933) 2003. Epistemological Problems of Economics. 3rd edn. Auburn, AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. ———. (1969) 2003. The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics. Online Edition. New Rochelle: Arlington House, Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. (1957) 2005. : An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. Liberty Fund Library of the Works of Ludwig Von Mises. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. ———. (1951) 2008. “Trends Can Change”.InPlanning for Freedom: Let the Market System Work; a Collection of Essays and Addresses, edited by Ludwig Von Mises and Bettina B. Greaves, 173–179. Liberty Fund Library of the Works of Ludwig Von Mises. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. ———. (1940, 1978) 2009. Memoirs. Auburn, AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. ———. (1912) 2009. The Theory of Money and Credit. Auburn, AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. ———. (1929) 2011. A Critique of Interventionism. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Instuitue. ———. (1934) 2012. “Maxims for the Discussion of Methodological Problems in the Social Sciences: Paper Delivered at the Private Seminar”.InMonetary and Economic Policy Problems Before, During, and After the Great War, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, 325–332. Selected writings of Ludwig von Mises /ed. and with an introd. by Richard M. Ebeling; Vol. 1. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. ———. (1962) 2012. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method. Princeton: Martino Fine Books. Mises, Ludwig von, and Bettina B. Greaves. 2004. The and Its Enemies: Pseudo-Science, Socialism, and Inflation. Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education. ———. 2007. “Mises’s Suggested Research Topics: 1950–1968.” Möller Van Der, Bruck, A. 1923. Das dritte Reich. Berlin: Ring Verlag. Murphy, Robert P. 2006. “Cantor’s Diagonal Argument: An Extension to the Socialist Calculation Debate”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9(2): 3–11. ———. 2008. “Austrian Realists.” http://mises.org/daily/3028/Austrian-Realists. Murphy, Robert P., and Amadeus Gabriel. 2008. Study Guide to Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, Scholar’s Edition Ludwig Von Mises; [A Guided Tutorial of Ludwig Von Mises’sClassicWork]. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Inst. REFERENCES 141

Murphy, Robert P., and Gene Callahan. 2006. “Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethic: A Critique”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 20(2): 54–64. Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London: Routledge. Nelson, Leonard. 1949. “The Critical Method and the Relation of Psychology to Philosophy”.InSocratic Method and Critical Philosophy: Selected Essays, 105–157. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ———. 1970. Progress and Regress in Philosophy: From Hume and Kant to Hegel and Fries, edited by Julius Kraft. Oxford: Blackwell. Nemeth, Elisabeth. 2013. “The Philosophy of the “Other Austrian Economics””.InNew Challenges to Philosophy of Science,editedbyHanne Andersen, 339–350 The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective 4. Dordrecht: Springer. Nock, Albert J. 1935. Our Enemy, The State. New York: William Morrow & Company. Nozick, Robert. 1977. “On Austrian Methodology”. Synthese 36: 353–392. O’Neill, Ben. 2010. “Choice and Indifference: A Critique of the Strict Preference Approach”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 13(1): 71–98. O’Neill, John. 2000. “‘Radical Subjectivism’: Not Radical, Not Subjectivist”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3(2): 21–30. Oppenheimer, Franz. (1929) 1990. Der Staat. 3rd edn. Berlin: Libertad Verlag. Otter, Nils. 2010. “Von der Praxeologie zur Rhetorik – zur Leistungsfähigkeit von zwei methodologischen Konzeptionen in der Ökonomie.” In Pies and Leschke 2010, 221–229. Pavlik, J. 2006. “Austrian Economics and the Problem of Apriorism”. E-Logios: Electronic Journal for Philosophy. ISSN 1211-0442. Pies, Ingo, and Martingarr Leschke, eds. 2010. Ludwig von Mises’ ökonomische Argumentationswissenschaft. Konzepte der Gesellschaftstheorie 16. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Popper, Karl R. 1950a. “Indeterminism in Quantum Physics and in Classical Physics Part I”. British Journal of Philosophy Science I(2): 117–133. doi: 10.1093/bjps/ I.2.117. ———. 1950b. “Indeterminism in Quantum Physics and in Classical Physics Part II”. British Journal of Philosophy Science I(3): 173–195. ———. (1944) 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ———. 1975. Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde 1: Der Zauber Platons. München: Francke. ———. 1980. Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde 2: Falsche Propheten.6.Aufl. Uni-Taschenbücher 473. München: Francke. ———. 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield. 142 REFERENCES

———. (1967) 1983. “The Rationality Principle”.InA Pocket Popper, edited by Miller, David, 357–365 Fontana Pocket Readers. London: Fontana. ———. 1994a. “Models, Instruments, and Truth”.InThe Myth of the Framework – In Defence of Science and Rationality, 154–184. London: Routledge. ———. 1994b. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Rev. edn., 8th impr. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ———. 1995. The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism. Reprinted. Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge. ———. (1906) 1997. The Poverty of Historicism. Repr. London u.a: Routledge. ———. (1960) 2000. “Three Views Concerning Human Knowledge”.In Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 5 edn. (rev.). reprint, 97–119. London: Routledge. ———. (1934) 2008. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Repr. 2008 (twice). Routledge Classics. London: Routledge. ———. (1933) 2010. Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie: Aufgrund von ManuskriptenausdenJahren1930–1933.3.Aufl., durchges. und erg. Gesammelte Werke in deutscher Sprache /Karl R. Popper; 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Prychitko, David L. 1998. “Praxeology.” In Boettke 1998, 77–83. Psillos, Stathis. 2011. “Choosing the Realist Framework”. Synthese 180: 301–316. Puster, Rolf W. 2014. “Dualismen und ihre Hintergründe”.InTheorie und Geschichte: Eine Interpretation sozialer und wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung, 7–50. München: Akston. Quine, W.v.O 2003. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”.InFrom a Logical Point of View: 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays, 2nd edn. rev., 14. print, 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Radnitzky, G. 1995. “Reply to Hoppe – On Apriorism in Austrian Economics”.In Values and Society: Values and the Social Order Volume 1, edited by G. Radnitzky and H. Bouillon. Repr, 189–194. Aldershot: Avebury. Raico, Ralph. 2012. and the Austrian School. Auburn, AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Reck, Erich. 2013. “Hempel, Carnap, and the Covering Law Model”.InThe Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism, edited by Nikolay Milkov and Volker Peckhaus, 311–324. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 273. Dordrecht: Springer. Reichenbach, Hans. (1938) 1961. Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ———. 1968. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ringer, Fritz K. 2000. Max Weber’s Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. 2. print., 1. Harvard University Press paperback ed. Cambridge, MA u.a: Harvard University Press. REFERENCES 143

Rizzo, Mario J. 1978. “Praxeology and Econometrics: A Critique of Positivist Economics.” In Spadaro 1978, 40–56. ———. 1983. “Mises and Lakatos: A Reformulation of Austrian Methodology”. In Method, Process, and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig Von Mises, edited by Israel M. Kirzner. 2. print, 53–74, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Robbins, Lionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: MacMillan & Co. Rosser, Barkley. 2015. “Complexity and Austrian Economics.” In Boettke and Coyne 2015b, 594–611. Rothbard, Murray N. 1951. “Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller”. American Economic Review, 41(5): 943–946. ———. 1960. “The Politics of Political Economists: Comment”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 74(4): 659–665. ———. 1961. “Statistics: Achilles’ Heel of Government”. (June): 40–44. ———. 1977. “The Distinction Between Theory and History”. Inquiry 1(14): 22–23. ———.1980.“Myth and Truth about Libertarianism”. Modern Age (Winter): 9–15. ———. 1987. “Breaking Out of the Walsrasian Box: The Case of Schumpeter and Hansen”. Review of Austrian Economics 1: 97–108. ———. (1963) 1990. What Has Government Done to Our Money? Baltimore: Laissez Faire Books. ———. 1997. The Logic of Action One. Method, Money and the Austrian School. 2 vols. Economists of the twentieth century/Murray N. Rothbard; 1. Cheltenham: Elgar. ———. (1956) 1997. “Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics”.InThe Logic of Action One. Method, Money and the Austrian School, 2 vols, 211–254. Economists of the Twentieth Century/Murray N. Rothbard; 1. Cheltenham: Elgar. ———. 1998. . New York: New York University Press. ———. 2002. “Milton Friedman Unraveled”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 16(4): 37–54. ———. 2006. “An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought 3 – From Marx to Hayek”. ———. (1985) 2007. “Preface”.InTheory and History,xi–xix. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. ———. 2009. Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles; with Power and Market: Government and the Economy. Auburn, AL: MISES. Salerno, Joseph T. 1996. “Ludwig von Mises und seine Ansichten über Vernunft, Wirtschaftsrechnung und die Gesellschaft.” In Grüske 1996, 91–111. 144 REFERENCES

———. 2002. “The Rebirth of Austrian Economics – In the Light of Austrian Economics”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 5(4): 111–128. ———. 2009. “Lionel Robbins: Neoclassical Maximizer or Proto-Praxeologist?” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 12(4): 98–110. ———. 2010. Money, Sound and Unsound. Auburn: Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Samuelson, Paul A. 1964. “Theory and Realism: A Reply”. The American Economic Review 54(5): 736–739. ———. 1981. “Bertil Ohlin (1899–1979)”. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 83(3): 355–371. Scheall, Scott. 2015. “Hayek the Apriorist?”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37(1), 87–110. Schiebinger, Londa L. 2004. Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Press. Schlick, Moritz. (1934). “On the Concept of Wholeness.” 388–399. Schmelzer, Ilja. 2016. “Against Absolute Certainty.” http://ilja-schmelzer.de/ papers/againstCertainty.pdf. Schmid, Michael. 2010. “Ludwig von Mises’ Praxeologie.” In Pies and Leschke 2010, 230–238. Schröder, Guido. 2010. “Kritik der unreinen Ökonomik: Ludwig von Mises’ Praxeologie als empiriefreier Ansatz einer logischen Ökonomik menschlicher Handlungen.” In Pies and Leschke 2010, 201–220. Schulak, Eugen M., and Unterköfler. Herbert. 2011. The Austrian School of Economics: A History of Its Ideas, Ambassadors, and Institutions. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Schumpeter, Joseph. (1908) 1980. Methodological Individualism. Bruxelles: Institutum Europaeum. ———. ed. (1908) 2010. The Nature and Essence of Economic Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publication. Schweinzer, Paul. 2000a. “Two Competing Paradigms in Austrian Economic Theory”. Notizie di Politeia 16(59): 44–66. ———. 2000b. “Two Competing Paradigms in Austrian Economic Theory”. Notizie di Politeia 59: 44–66. Selgin, George A. 1990. Praxeology and Understanding: An Analysis of the Controversy in Austrian Economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Inst. Praxeology Press. Smith, Adam. (1776) 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations: Two Volumes in One, edited by Edwin Cannan. Chicago IL: Univ. of Chicago Press. Smith, Barry. 1986. “Austrian Economics and Austrian Philosophy”.InAustrian Economics – Historical and Philosophical Backgrounds, edited by Wolfgang Grassl and Barry Smith, 1–36. London: Croom Helm. REFERENCES 145

———. 1990. “The Question of Apriorism”. Austrian Economics Newsletter (Fall), 1–5. ———. 1996. “In Defense of Extreme (fallibilistic) Apriorism”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 12(1): 179–192. ———. 1998. “, Apriorism, Essentialism.” In Boettke 1998, 33–37. Sober, Elliott. 1999. “Testability”. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73(2): 47–76. Spadaro, Louis M. ed. 1978. New Directions in Austrian Economics. Studies in Economic Theory. Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel. Stadler, Friedrich, I. Kieseppä, and N. Koertge. 1999. “Science – A House built on Sand? A Conversation with Noretta Koertge”.InEpistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics, edited by D. Greenberger, Wolfgang L. Reiter, and Anton Zeilinger, 279–301. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Stadler, Friedrich. 2007. “History of Philosophy of Science: From Wissenschaftslogik (Logic of Science) to Philosophy of Science: Europe and America, 1930–1960”.InGeneral Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues, edited by Theo A. F. Kuipers, 601–680 Handbook of the philosophy of science. Amsterdam, London: North Holland. Stolyarov II., Gennady. 2007. “The Compatibility of Hoppe’s and Rothbard’s Views of the ”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 10(2): 45–62. Storr, Virgil H. 2010. “The Facts of the Social Sciences Are What People Believe and Think.” In Boettke 2010, 30–40. Streissler, Erich. 2002. “Wirtschaftliche Entscheidungstheorie als Angelpunkt der Österreichischen Schule der Nationalökonomie”.InGesellschaft denken: Eine erkenntnistheoretische Standortbestimmung der Sozialwissenschaften, edited by Leonhard Bauer and Klaus Hamberger, 309–318 Politische Philosophie und Ökonomie. Wien: Springer. Stringham, Edward P. 2010. “Economic Value and Costs Are Subjective.” In Boettke 2010, 43–66. Suppe, Frederick, ed. 1979. The Structure of Scientific Theories. 2. edn., 2. print. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. ———. 1989. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Supper, M., and E. Hofbauer, eds, 1981. “Ludwig von Mises – Seine Ideen und seine Wirkung”. Special issue, Wirtschaftspolitischee Blätter 28(4): 1–151. Talmon, J. L. 1985a. Political Messianism: The Romantic Phase. Boulder: Westview Press. ———. 1985b. The Origins of Totalitarian . Boulder: Westview Press. 146 REFERENCES

———. 1991. Myth of the Nation and Vision of Revolution: Ideological Polarization in the Twentieth Century. 1st pbk. edn. Social science classics series. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Tokumaru, N. 2009. “Popper’s Analysis of the Problem of Induction and Demarcation and Mises’ Justification of the Theoretical Social Sciences”.In Rethinking Popper, edited by Robert S. Cohen, Jürgen Renn, Kostas Gavroglu, Zuzana Parusniková, and Robert S. Cohen. 1. Aufl., 161–74. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 272 v.No. 272. s.l, Netherlands: Springer. Tucker, Benjamin. 1896. Liberty. New York: Vanguard Press. Uebel, Thomas. 1996. “The Enlightenment Ambition of Epistemic Utopianism: Otto Neurath’s Theory of Science in Historical Perspective”.InOrigins of Logical Empiricism, edited by Ronald N. Giere and Alan W. Richardson, 91–112 Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science v. 16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ———. 2008. “Introduction: Neurath’s Economics in Context”.InOtto Neurath’s Economics in Context, edited by Elisabeth Nemeth, Stefan W. Schmitz, and Thomas Uebel. 1. Aufl., 1–108. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 13 v.v. 13. s.l, Netherlands: Springer. Van Fraassen, Bas C. 2002. The Empirical Stance. The Terry lectures. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Vickers, John. 2014. “The Problem of Induction.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/. Weber, Max. 2002. Schriften zur Wissenschaftslehre. In Klarheit und Methode: Felix Kaufmanns Wissenschaftstheorie. Studien zur österreichischen Philosophie 16, edited by Max Weber and Michael Sukale. Universal-Bibliothek 8748. Stuttgart: Reclam. ———. 2008. “Objectivity and Understanding in Economics”.InThe Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology, edited by Daniel M. Hausman, 3rd edn, 59–72. New York: Cambridge University Press. Weber, Wilhelm. 1949. Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Wirtschaftspolitik in Österreich. Wien: Springer. White, Lawrence. 1992. “Afterword: Appraising Austrian Economics: Contentions and Misdirections.” In Caldwell and Böhm 1992, 257–268. ———. (1977) 2003. The Methodology of the Austrian School of Economics. Auburn, AL: The Ludwig von Mises Institute. Zanotti, Gabriel J., and Nicolas Cachanovsky. 2015. “Implications of Machlup’s Interpretation of Mises’s Epistemology”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37(1): 111–138. Zilian, Hans G. 1990. Klarheit und Methode: Felix Kaufmanns Wissenschaftstheorie. Studien zur österreichischen Philosophie 16.Amsterdam:Rodopi INDEX

A Bridgman, Pery Williams, 67 Albert, Hans, 69 Bücher, Karl, 22 Analytic, 66, 81, 88, 94, 96, 100, 108, 112, 121 Anti-naturalism, 10, 13, 36, C 64, 115 Carnap, Rudolf, 10, 28, 33, 63, Antipsychologism, 80 72, 88, 90, 105, 127 Apriorism, 2, 63, 81, 83, 84, 86, 87, Chicago School, 25, 65 109, 116 , 20, 21, 36, 110 Archibald, George Christopher, 69 Collingwood, Robin George, 36, 52 Aristotle, 25, 76, 110 Comte, 14, 22 Austrian Institute of Economic Conant, James, 67 Research, 44 Conceptual analysis, 82 Auxiliary axioms, 45, 46 Conditional sentence, 123 Axiom, 45, 120 Context of discovery, 29, 55 Context of justification, 29, 55 Conventionalism, 3, 46, 66, 75, B 81, 83, 88, 93, 94, 96, 109, Behaviorism, 16, 36, 52, 113, 116 84, 88 Coudenhove-Kalergi, Richard, 21 Bergson, Henri, 36 Critical rationalism, 36 Blaug, Mark, 44, 99 Croce, Benedetto, 36 Block, Walter, 50 Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von, 63 Boundary conditions, 53, 123, 124, D 127 Deductivism, 90, 109 Braithwaite, Richard, 127 Degenfeld-Schonburg, Ferdinand Breuer, Josef, 50 von, 68

© The Author(s) 2017 147 A. Linsbichler, Was Ludwig von Mises a Conventionalist?, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46170-0 148 INDEX

De Jasay, Anthony, 55 Frege, Gottlob, 29, 108, 120 Demonstrated preference, 31 Freud, Sigmund, 50 Descartes, Rene, 59 Friedman, Milton, 65 Determinism, 15, 64, 111 Full decidability, 60, 63, 65, 69 Dilthey, Wilhelm, 36, 38 Fundamental axiom, 44, 45, 68, 78, Dingler, Hugo, 67 81, 83, 87, 100, 109 DN model, 122 Dualism, 13, 14, 15, 16, 36, 88, 115 G Duhem, Pierre, 67, 91 Garrison, Roger, 23 Genetic or psychological a priori, 79 Gottl-Ottlilienfeld, Friedrich von, 21 E Econometrics, 13, 36 Empirical, 108 H Empiricism, 12 Haeckel, Ernst, 14 Empirism, 36, 58, 60, 63 Hansen, Norwood Russell, 55 Engels, Friedrich, 22 Harrod, Roy F., 63 Essence, 68 Hayek, Friedrich August von, 4, 15, Essentialism, 21, 36, 68, 71, 17, 18, 31, 32, 44, 69, 72, 77, 81, 103, 107, 108, 109, 90, 105, 112 115, 116 Hegel, Georg Friedrich Euclid, 87, 120 Wilhelm, 22 Euclidean geometry, 84, 87 Hempel, Carl Gustav, 122 Experience, 58, 63, 69, Hilbert, David, 101, 120 78, 81 Historical School, 3, 12, 36, 38, 39, Explanandum, 123, 124 115 Explanans, 52, 77, 123 Historical understanding, see Explanation, 13, 17, 39, 52, 58, Understanding 110, 122, 123 Historicism, 3, 8, 36, 38, 39, 78, 115 Historism, 39 F Hobbes, Thomas, 32 Fallibilism, 45, 69, 80, 116 Homo oeconomicus, 50 Falsifiable, 108 Hoppe, 27, 31, 32, 56, 71, 79, 90 Falsification, 43, 44, 69, 95, Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, 4, 27, 108 115, 125 Hufeland, Gottlieb, 17 Feuerbach, Ludwig, 14 Hume, David, 11, 60, 62, 64, 71, 74 Formalization, 27, 46, 100, 102, 109, Hutchison, Terence, 69 116, 120 Hymology, 89 Formal methods, 22 Hypotheticism, 67, 69, 79 INDEX 149

I Marx, Karl, 22 Ideal types, 40, 47 Marxism, 10, 21, 22, 28, 36 Individualism, 32, 36, 75, 81, 115 Mayer, Hans, 21, 68, 112 Inductivism, 58, 88 Menger, Carl, 5, 9, 29, 31, 37, 38, 49, Intuition, 22, 36, 38, 67, 62, 102, 110 68, 87, 110 Menger, Karl, 102, 116 Meta-economics, 102, 116 Methodenstreit, 31, 37, 114 J Methodological individualism, 2, 14, Jerusalem, Wilhelm, 87 16, 17, 18, 23, 32, 68, 110 Jevons, Stanley, 9, 38, 63 Microfoundations, 22 Milford, Karl, 17, 57, 58, 59, 67, 68, 110, 114 K Mill, John Stuart, 37, 38, 59, 61, 71 Kant, Immanel, 27, 55, 63, 79, Mises, Ludwig von, 4, 8, 23, 87, 121, 122 28, 38 Kant, Immanuel, 109, 117 Mises, Margit, 4 Kaufmann, Felix, 10, 17, 31, 74, 76 Mises, Richard von, 64, 117, 121 Keynes, John Maynard, 63, 91 Model, 2, 76 Keynes, John Neville, 78 Moeller van den Bruck, Arthur, 83 Kirzner, Israel, 8, 29, 41, 74, Monism, 13, 14 77, 91 Morgenstern, Oskar, 105 Knies, Karl, 36, 37, 62 Kuhn, Thomas, 67 N Naive inductivism, 61, 79 L Naumann, Friedrich, 21 Lakatos, Imre, 55, 67, 97 Neumann, John von, 105 La Mettrie, Julien Offray, 14 Neurath, Otto, 14, 105 Late Enlightenment, 83 Nominalism, 64, 68, 111 laws of historical development, 22, 36, Normal-sentence positions, 60, 63 38, 39 Nozick, Robert, 27, 31, 32 Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien, 87 Lipsey, Richard, 69 Long, Roderick T., 25, 48, 83, 91, O 108, 109 Oppenheim, Paul, 122, 127

M P Mach, Ernst, 31, 62 Panphysicalism, 15, 16, 36 Macroeconomics, 22, 36 Pareto, Vilfredo, 67 150 INDEX

Partial decidability, 69, 71, 72 Rickert, 28, 36, 37 Physicalism, 16, 32, 36 Rickert, Heinrich, 36, 37 Physiocrats, 9 Robbins, Lionel, 104 Poincare, Henri, 67, 88, 90 Roscher, Wilhelm, 68 Polylogism, 28 Rothbard, 107 Popper, Karl, 10, 11, 18, 20, 31, Rothbard, Murray Newton, 5, 18, 32, 57–59, 73, 90, 91, 108, 23, 27, 31, 45, 54, 82, 103, 114, 127 105, 109, 116 A posteriori, 88 Russell, Bertrand, 45 Praxeology, 3, 4, 38, 43, 47, 48, 51, 54, 115 Precisive, 25 S Prediction, 52, 58, 122, Samuelson, Paul, 109 124, 128 Scheler, Max, 96 Principle of rationality, 91 Schlick, Moritz, 33, 65, 127 Principle of tolerance, 108 Schlick. Moritz, 88 A priori, 45, 74, 79, 81, 84, 86, Schmoller, Gustav von, 12, 28, 31, 87, 107, 108, 116 35, 38, 61 Probability positions, 36, 63, 79 Schumpeter, Joseph, 17, 21, Problem of induction, 11, 26, 35, 65, 71 57, 60, 63, 74, 108, 114 Schütz, Alfred, 36, 74 Pseudo-sentence positions, 36, 65, 66 Scientificity, 9 Puster, Rolf, 88 Semantic view of theories, 126 Senior, Nassau Wilhelm, 38 Smith, Adam, 9, 19 Q Smith, Barry, 72 Quine, Willard van Orman, 67, Socratic Method, 83, 111 95, 127 Spann, Othmar, 21, 22, 32, 68 Spengler, Oswald, 22 Spinoza, Baruch, 59 R Sprachgeist, 112 Radnitzky, Gerard, 72, 109, 117 Strict positivism, 61, 79 Ranke, Leopold von, 61, 68 Subjectivism, 2, 29, 77 – Rationality, 33, 50 Synthetic, 63, 85, 86, 94, 108 109, Rational reconstruction, 30, 113 121, 122 Realism, 26, 32, 83 Received view of theories, 126 Reichenbach, Hans, 29, 63, T 84, 110 Theoretism, 58, 60, 62, 65–67 Research program, 109 Theory, 76–78, 120 Reverse economics, 102 Thymology, 48, 52, 54, 55, 95, Ricardo, David, 9, 23 98, 115, 116 INDEX 151

Tokumaru, Natsuka, 74, 75, 79, See also Understanding 90, 104, 116 Vico, Giambattista, 22 Toynbee, Arnold J., 22 Vienna Circle, 32, 33 Truth, 26, 28, 50, 65, 70, 83, Volksgeist, 22, 112 84, 91, 109

U W Ultimate given, 14, 16, 18, 32 Walras, Leon, 9, 38 Understanding, 8, 36, 38, 51, Weber, Max, 17, 20, 27, 32, 36, 37, 54, 78, 98 47, 48 Unintended, 16, 18, 19 Wertfreiheit, 27 Universal conditional See also Value freedom sentences, 123 Wesensgesetze, 68 Universalism, 21, 32, 36, 68, 79, 107 Whewell, Wilhelm, 127 Wieser, Friedrich von, 21, 63, 68, 71, 110, 111 V Windelband, Value freedom, 27 Wilhelm, 36, 37 Verstehen, 116 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 59, 83