CAROLINA CORREIA SILIPRANDI Are Landmarks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CAROLINA CORREIA SILIPRANDI Are Landmarks Universidade de São Paulo Instituto Oceanográfico CAROLINA CORREIA SILIPRANDI Are landmarks analysis adequate to identify fish assemblages in a subtropical ecosystem? Study of case for the Araçá Bay (São Sebastião, Brazil). VERSÃO CORRIGIDA Tese apresentada ao Instituto Oceanográfico da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de “Doutor em Ciências”, Programa Oceanografia, Área de Oceanografia Biológica. Julgada em ___/___/___ _________________________________ ______________ Prof(a). Dr(a). Conceito _________________________________ ______________ Prof(a). Dr(a). Conceito _________________________________ ______________ Prof(a). Dr(a). Conceito _________________________________ ______________ Prof(a). Dr(a). Conceito _________________________________ ______________ Prof(a). Dr(a). Conceito ii SUMMARY FIGURE INDEX .................................................................................................................... iv TABLE INDEX ...................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (AGRADECIMENTOS) ................................................................... ix ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... xi RESUMO ............................................................................................................................. xiii CHAPTER 1. Shape’s diversity towards ecomorphology: a historical review ....................... 15 1. Importance of the morphology in biological studies ................................................... 16 2. Historical survey about measuring the morphological variability ................................ 17 3. Quantitative techniques for measuring morphological variability ................................ 34 CHAPTER 2. Optimal fishing samplers to reveal the morphological structure of a fish assemblage in a subtropical tidal flat ................................................................................... 40 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 41 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 41 2. Material and Methods ................................................................................................ 44 2.1. Study area .......................................................................................................... 44 2.2. Sampling ............................................................................................................ 45 2.3. Geometric morphometric data and analysis ....................................................... 48 2.4. Measuring morphological diversity ..................................................................... 48 2.5. Statistical analysis .............................................................................................. 50 3. Results ...................................................................................................................... 50 3.1. Composition and morphological structure of the fish assemblage ...................... 50 3.2. Morphological variability according to each gear ................................................ 53 3.3. Effect of fishing gear on the fish assemblage ..................................................... 54 4. Discussion ................................................................................................................. 58 CHAPTER 3. How diversity indicators reveal fish habitats use ............................................ 61 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 62 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 62 2. Material and Methods ................................................................................................ 66 2.1. Sampling ............................................................................................................ 66 2.2. Fish composition and habitat .............................................................................. 68 2.3. Morphological diversity ....................................................................................... 69 2.4. Functional Diversity ............................................................................................ 70 2.5. Taxonomic Diversity ........................................................................................... 72 2.6. Ecologic diversity ............................................................................................... 72 3. Results ...................................................................................................................... 73 iii 3.1. Fish composition and habitat .............................................................................. 73 3.2. Morphospaces of fish assemblages ................................................................... 77 3.3. Functional spaces of fish assemblages .............................................................. 79 3.4. Comparing diversity indices................................................................................ 82 4. Discussion ................................................................................................................. 87 CHAPTER 4. Fish body shapes and otolith shapes: are them morphologically correspondent? …… ..................................................................................................................................... 92 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 93 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 93 2. Material and Methods ................................................................................................ 96 2.1. Sampling ............................................................................................................ 96 2.2. Otolith Size Parameters ..................................................................................... 97 2.3. Otolith Shape Indices ......................................................................................... 99 2.4. Geometric Morphology ..................................................................................... 101 2.5. Wavelet Transform Representation .................................................................. 102 2.6. Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................... 103 3. Results .................................................................................................................... 105 3.1. Morphometry .................................................................................................... 105 3.2. Shape Indices .................................................................................................. 110 3.4. Geometric Morphology ..................................................................................... 114 3.5. Wavelet Transform Representation .................................................................. 116 3.6. Morphological correspondence between otolith and fish body shapes ............. 124 4. Discussion ............................................................................................................... 126 FINAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................ 132 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS ...................................................................................... 136 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 145 iv FIGURE INDEX Figure 1. Rondelet’s Illustrations based on Aristotle’s descriptions of an adult sepia (left side), and a young dogfish (Mustelus laevis) still attached by the umbilical cord to its mother (right side) (Modified of BLITS, 1999). ........................................................... 18 Figure 2. Darwin's drawings of the different heads and beaks he found among the finches on the Galapagos Islands (Source: Darwin Online). ..................................... 24 Figure 3. D’Arcy Thompson example of homology as a smooth deformation, displaying the correspondence of homologous points (a) and by a Cartesian grid transformation (b) (Source BOOKSTEIN et al., 1985). ...................................................................... 27 Figure 4. a) Araçá Bay location, bordering São Sebastião Channel, north shore of São Paulo State, Brazil; b) Top view of the Araçá bay (Source: Gabriel Monteiro). ......... 45 Figure 5. Schemes of fishing gears employed in sampling fish faunal diversity in Araçá Bay: a) otter trawl; b) beach seine; c) encircling gillnet 1; d) encircling gillnet 2; and f) large and small gillnets; g) cast net; h) fish trap; and hook and line, not illustrated. (Source images: Ichthyofauna and Growth Laboratory – LABIC, University of São Paulo, designer: Laura Montserrat). .......................................................................... 47 Figure 6. Landmarks and semilandmarks used in the geometric
Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Assemblage of the Mamanguape Environmental Protection Area, NE Brazil: Abundance, Composition and Microhabitat Availability Along the Mangrove-Reef Gradient
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 10(1): 109-122, 2012 Copyright © 2012 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Fish assemblage of the Mamanguape Environmental Protection Area, NE Brazil: abundance, composition and microhabitat availability along the mangrove-reef gradient Josias Henrique de Amorim Xavier1, Cesar Augusto Marcelino Mendes Cordeiro2, Gabrielle Dantas Tenório1, Aline de Farias Diniz1, Eugenio Pacelli Nunes Paulo Júnior1, Ricardo S. Rosa1 and Ierecê Lucena Rosa1 Reefs, mangroves and seagrass biotopes often occur in close association, forming a complex and highly productive ecosystem that provide significant ecologic and economic goods and services. Different anthropogenic disturbances are increasingly affecting these tropical coastal habitats leading to growing conservation concern. In this field-based study, we used a visual census technique (belt transects 50 m x 2 m) to investigate the interactions between fishes and microhabitats at the Mamanguape Mangrove-Reef system, NE Brazil. Overall, 144 belt transects were performed from October 2007 to September 2008 to assess the structure of the fish assemblage. Fish trophic groups and life stage (juveniles and adults) were recorded according to literature, the percent cover of the substrate was estimated using the point contact method. Our results revealed that fish composition gradually changed from the Estuarine to the Reef zone, and that fish assemblage was strongly related to the microhabitat availability, as suggested by the predominance of carnivores at the Estuarine zone and presence of herbivores at the Reef zone. Fish abundance and diversity were higher in the Reef zone and estuary margins, highlighting the importance of structural complexity. A pattern of nursery area utilization, with larger specimens at the Transition and Reef Zone and smaller individuals at the Estuarine zone, was recorded for Abudefduf saxatilis, Anisotremus surinamensis, Lutjanus alexandrei, and Lutjanus jocu.
    [Show full text]
  • Cichlid Diversity, Speciation and Systematics: Examples from the Great African Lakes
    Cichlid diversity, speciation and systematics: examples from the Great African Lakes Jos Snoeks, Africa Museum, Ichthyology- Cichlid Research Unit, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Ter­ vuren,.Belgium. Tel: (32) 2 769 56 28, Fax: (32) 2 769 56 42(e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT The cichlid faunas of the large East African lakes pro vide many fascina ting research tapies. They are unique because of the large number of species involved and the ir exceptional degree ofendemicity. In addition, certain taxa exhibit a substantial degree of intra~lacustrine endemism. These features al one make the Great African Lakes the largest centers of biodiversity in the vertebrate world. The numbers of cichlid species in these lakes are considered from different angles. A review is given of the data available on the tempo of their speciation, and sorne of the biological implications of its explosive character are discussed. The confusion in the definition of many genera is illustrated and the current methodology of phylogenetic research briefly commented upon. Theresults of the systematic research within the SADC/GEFLake Malawi/NyasaBiodiversity Conservation Project are discussed. It is argued that systematic research on the East African lake cichlids is entering an era of lesser chaos but increasing complexity. INTRODUCTION The main value of the cichlids of the Great African Grea ter awareness of the scientific and economi­ Lakes is their economie importance as a readily cal value of these fishes has led to the establishment accessible source of protein for the riparian people. In of varioüs recent research projects such as the three addition, these fishes are important to the specialized GEF (Global Environmental Facility) projects on the aquarium trade as one of the more exci ting fish groups larger lakes (Victoria, Tanganyika, Malawi/Nyasa).
    [Show full text]
  • Dedication Donald Perrin De Sylva
    Dedication The Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Mangroves as Fish Habitat are dedicated to the memory of University of Miami Professors Samuel C. Snedaker and Donald Perrin de Sylva. Samuel C. Snedaker Donald Perrin de Sylva (1938–2005) (1929–2004) Professor Samuel Curry Snedaker Our longtime collaborator and dear passed away on March 21, 2005 in friend, University of Miami Professor Yakima, Washington, after an eminent Donald P. de Sylva, passed away in career on the faculty of the University Brooksville, Florida on January 28, of Florida and the University of Miami. 2004. Over the course of his diverse A world authority on mangrove eco- and productive career, he worked systems, he authored numerous books closely with mangrove expert and and publications on topics as diverse colleague Professor Samuel Snedaker as tropical ecology, global climate on relationships between mangrove change, and wetlands and fish communities. Don pollutants made major scientific contributions in marine to this area of research close to home organisms in south and sedi- Florida ments. One and as far of his most afield as enduring Southeast contributions Asia. He to marine sci- was the ences was the world’s publication leading authority on one of the most in 1974 of ecologically important inhabitants of “The ecology coastal mangrove habitats—the great of mangroves” (coauthored with Ariel barracuda. His 1963 book Systematics Lugo), a paper that set the high stan- and Life History of the Great Barracuda dard by which contemporary mangrove continues to be an essential reference ecology continues to be measured. for those interested in the taxonomy, Sam’s studies laid the scientific bases biology, and ecology of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • (<I>Anisotremus Virginicus,</I> Haemulidae) And
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 34(1): 21-59,1984 DESCRIPTION OF PORKFISH LARVAE (ANISOTREMUS VIRGINICUS, HAEMULIDAE) AND THEIR OSTEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Thomas Potthoff, Sharon Kelley, Martin Moe and Forrest Young ABSTRACT Wild-caught adult porkfish (Anisotremus virginicus, Haemulidae) were spawned in the laboratory and their larvae reared. A series of 35 larvae 2.4 mm NL to 21.5 mm SL from 2 to 30 days old or older (larvae of unknown age) was studied for pigmentation characteristics. Cleared and stained specimens were examined for meristic and osteological development. Cartilaginous neural and haemal arches develop first anteriorly, at the center, and posteriorly, above and below the notochord, but ossification of the vertebral column is from anterior in a posterior direction. Epipleural rib pairs develop from bone, but pleural rib pairs develop from cartilage first and then ossify. The second dorsal, anal and caudal fins develop rays first and simultaneously, followed by first dorsal fin spine development. The pectoral and pelvic fins are the last of all fins to develop rays. All bones basic to a perciform pectoral girdle develop with cartilaginous radials present between the pectoral fin ray bases. Development and structure of pre dorsal bones and dorsal and anal fin pterygiophores were studied. All bones basic to a perciform caudal complex developed and no fusion of any of these bones was observed in the adults. Radial cartilages developed ventrad in the hypural complex. The hyoid arches originated from cartilage but the branchiostegal rays formed from bone. The development and anatomy of the branchial skeleton were studied. Spines develop on the four bones of the opercular series in larvae and juveniles but are absent in the adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chilomycterus Antennatus (Bridled Burrfish)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Diversity Chilomycterus antennatus (Bridled Burrfish) Family: Diodontidae (Porcupinefish) Order: Tetraodontiformes (Pufferfish, Triggerfish and Boxfish) Class: Actinopterygii (Ray-finned Fish) Fig. 1. Bridled burrfish, Chilomycterus antennatus [http://biogeodb.stri.si.edu/caribbean/en/pages/random/10321, downloaded 26 October 2016] TRAITS. A species of fish with small, black spots and a yellowish-brown body, head and base of tail. On the anterior base of the dorsal fin and in the middle of the back are two or more white-rimmed, large, black spots. The eyes are large with a gold iris surrounded by a ring of black dots, and above each eye is a large projection (Fig. 1). The body is round and has the ability to inflate or expand. There are no pelvic fins; large pectoral fins without spines; nine caudal fin rays; few motionless, short spines covering the body and head. The teeth are fused and the nasal organ is a hollow, short tentacle with two openings. Size usually 15-30cm, but males can grow up to 38cm. Young fish up to 3cm inhabit the water column (Smith, 1997). DISTRIBUTION. Range is the Gulf of Mexico from northwestern Cuba, Florida Keys, south from Cape Canaveral along the U.S. coast, the Bahamas, the Caribbean Sea with the exception of the Cayman Islands. Found on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 2). The bridled burrfish is native to Trinidad and Tobago (Leis et al., 2015). UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Diversity HABITAT AND ECOLOGY.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Catfish Genidens Barbus (Ariidae)
    An Acad Bras Cienc (2020) 92(Suppl. 2): e20180450 DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202020180450 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências | Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences Printed ISSN 0001-3765 I Online ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES The marine catfi sh Genidens barbus (Ariidae) Running title: MARINE CATFISH fi sheries in the state of São Paulo, southeastern FISHERY IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL Brazil: diagnosis and management suggestions JOCEMAR T. MENDONÇA, SAMUEL BALANIN & DOMINGOS GARRONE-NETO Academy Section: BIOLOGICAL Abstract : In this study we analyzed data on fi shing landings of Genidens barbus in the SCIENCES state of São Paulo, Brazil, from 2000 to 2014. An estimation of the total production was obtained through the analysis of 781,856 landings, among which 87% were categorized as artisanal and 13% as industrial. The abundance index showed some stability in the e20180450 period. However, due to the high number of production units, the fi shing effort need to be maintained, given that there is a risk that increased production might affect the abundance of G. barbus. Thus, as alternatives to maintaining marine catfi sh exploitation 92 in southeastern Brazil under control, the following management actions can be (Suppl. 2) suggested: i) prohibition of fi shing activity by the industrial sector; ii) strengthening of 92(Suppl. 2) inspection of the fl eet that is not allowed to participate in the marine catfi sh fi sheries, with emphasis on purse seiners; and iii) maintenance of a closed season for G. barbus, performing an adaptive management of fi shing prohibition according to the reproductive biology of the species and with the support of artisanal fi shers.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Biometric Sexual and Ontogenetic Dimorphism on the Marine Catfish Genidens Genidens (Siluriformes, Ariidae) in a Tropic
    Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research E-ISSN: 0718-560X [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Chile Paiva, Larissa G.; Prestrelo, Luana; Sant’Anna, Kiani M.; Vianna, Marcelo Biometric sexual and ontogenetic dimorphism on the marine catfish Genidens genidens (Siluriformes, Ariidae) in a tropical estuary Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, vol. 43, núm. 5, noviembre, 2015, pp. 895- 903 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Valparaíso, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=175042668009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 43(5): 895-903, 2015 Dimorphism on the marine catfish Genidens genidens 895 DOI: 10.3856/vol43-issue5-fulltext-9 Research Article Biometric sexual and ontogenetic dimorphism on the marine catfish Genidens genidens (Siluriformes, Ariidae) in a tropical estuary Larissa G. Paiva1, Luana Prestrelo1,2, Kiani M. Sant’Anna1 & Marcelo Vianna1 1Laboratório de Biologia e Tecnologia Pesqueira, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho 373 Bl. A, 21941-902 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 2Fundação Instituto de Pesca do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Escritório Regional Norte Fluminense II Avenida Rui Barbosa 1725, salas 57/58, Alto dos Cajueiros, Macaé, RJ, Brazil Corresponding author: Larissa G. Paiva ([email protected]) ABSTRACT. This paper aims to study the ontogenetic sexual dimorphism of Genidens genidens in Guanabara Bay, southeastern coast of Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Suborder ACANTHUROIDEI EPHIPPIDAE Chaetodipterus Faber
    click for previous page Perciformes: Acanthuroidei: Ephippidae 1799 Suborder ACANTHUROIDEI EPHIPPIDAE Spadefishes by W.E. Burgess, Red Bank, New Jersey, USA A single species occurring in the area. Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet, 1782) HRF Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / None. FAO names: En - Atlantic spadefish; Fr - Disque portuguais; Sp - Paguara. Diagnostic characters: Body deep, included 1.2 to 1.5 times in standard length, orbicular, strongly compressed. Mouth small, terminal, jaws provided with bands of brush-like teeth, outer row larger and slightly compressed but pointed at tip. Vomer and palatines toothless. Preopercular margin finely serrate; opercle ends in blunt point. Dorsal fin with 9 spines and 21 to 23 soft rays. Spinous portion of dorsal fin low in adults, distinct from soft-rayed portion; anterior portion of soft dorsal and anal fins prolonged.Juve- niles with third dorsal fin spine prolonged, becoming proportionately smaller with age. Anal fin with 3 spines and 18 or 19 rays. Pectoral fins short, about 1.6 in head, with 17 or 18 soft rays. Caudal fin emarginate. Pelvic fins long, extending to origin of anal fin in adults, beyond that in young. Lateral-line scales 45 to 50. Head and fins scaled. Colour: silvery grey with blackish bars (bars may fade in large individuals) as follows: Eye bar extends from nape through eye to chest; first body bar starts at predorsal area, crosses body behind pectoral fin insertion, and ends on abdomen; second body bar incomplete, extending from anterior dorsal-fin spines vertically toward abdomen but ending just below level of pectoral-fin base;third body bar extends from anterior rays of dorsal fin across body to anterior rays of anal fin;last body bar runs from the middle soft dorsal fin rays to middle soft anal-fin rays; last bar crosses caudal peduncle at caudal-fin base.
    [Show full text]