Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Volume 14 Lanthorn, 1968-2001 4-30-1981 Lanthorn, vol. 14, no. 32, April 30, 1981 Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/lanthorn_vol14 Part of the Archival Science Commons, Education Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Grand Valley State University, "Lanthorn, vol. 14, no. 32, April 30, 1981" (1981). Volume 14. 33. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/lanthorn_vol14/33 This Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Lanthorn, 1968-2001 at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 14 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. The issue of property taxes reappears in the lives of Michigan voters the citizens are insisting upon it and posal fails, we might be faced with since state revenues are reduced by May 19, Michigan voters will the remainder needed to reimburse stead property tax relief program. it needs to be done.’’ another proposal such as the Tisch, $250,000. head toward the polls for a special local governments, in addition to the "I strongly support the tax pro “This one provides an adequate that would be disastrous." “ But it (the proposal) doesn’t election. Once again, the question savings incurred by the property posal,” says President Arend Lubbers property tax cut,” Lubbers stated. Lubbers did say that the pro-- dismantle higher e ducat.on,” Lub of a property tax cut appears on tax cuts, through the reduction “I personally believe that there needs I think He also commented, "If this pro poal docs not favor higher education bers remarked.