DOCSLIB.ORG

Climate Risks to Conservation in Uganda an Assessment of Selected Regions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Climate Risks to Conservation in Uganda an Assessment of Selected Regions TECHNICAL REPORT CLIMATE RISKS TO CONSERVATION IN UGANDA AN ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED REGIONS May 2017 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics for the ATLAS Task Order. This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics for the Climate Change Adaptation, Thought Leadership and Assessments (ATLAS) Task Order No. AID-OAA-I-14-00013, under the Restoring the Environment through Prosperity, Livelihoods, and Conserving Ecosystems (REPLACE) IDIQ. Chemonics contact: Chris Perine, Chief of Party ([email protected])- Chemonics International Inc. 1717 H Street NW Washington, DC 20006 ATLAS reports and other products are available on the ClimateLinks website (https://www.climatelinks.org/projects/atlas). Cover Photo: ATLAS. CLIMATE RISKS TO CONSERVATION IN UGANDA AN ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED REGIONS May 2017 Prepared for: United States Agency for International Development Climate Change Adaptation, Thought Leadership and Assessments (ATLAS) Prepared by: Chemonics International Inc. This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ···································································· III ACRONYMS ·································································································· V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ················································································· VI Purpose vi Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... vi Key Findings .................................................................................................................................... viii Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ ix 1. ASSESSMENT PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY ··········································· 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology .............................................................................................................. 2 Research Questions .......................................................................................................................... 2 Selection of Study Landscapes ......................................................................................................... 3 Team and Study Design .................................................................................................................... 4 Ratings of Landscapes On Several Criteria ....................................................................................... 5 Study Limitations and Assumptions ................................................................................................... 6 2. LANDSCAPE ANALYSES ············································································ 9 General Background ........................................................................................................ 9 Climate Stressors ............................................................................................................................ 10 Non-climate Stressors ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 LANDSCAPE 1 ANALYSIS ········································································12 Kidepo Valley National Park (KVNP), Pian Upe Wildlife Reserve (WR), Lake Bisina and Lake Opeta Wetlands Systems and Surrounding Communities ........ 12 Region: Dry Cattle Corridor ............................................................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Location and Description ........................................................................................................ 13 2.1.2 Unique Climate Characteristics .............................................................................................. 13 2.1.3 Climate Projections ................................................................................................................. 13 2.1.4 Non-Climate Stressors............................................................................................................ 13 2.1.5 Biodiversity Resources of Importance .................................................................................... 14 2.1.6 Livelihoods of Importance ....................................................................................................... 15 2.1.7 Ecosystem Services ............................................................................................................... 15 2.1.8 Climate Stressors, Risks, Impacts and Adaptive Responses ................................................. 15 2.1.9 Climate Change Risk Significance Rating .............................................................................. 23 2.2 LANDSCAPE 2 ANALYSIS ········································································24 Lake Mburo Conservation Area (LMCA) and Surrounding Communities ....................... 24 Region: Dry Cattle Corridor ............................................................................................................. 24 2.2.1 Location and Description ........................................................................................................ 25 2.2.2 Unique Climate Characteristics .............................................................................................. 25 2.2.3 Climate Projections ................................................................................................................. 25 2.2.4 Non-Climate Stressors............................................................................................................ 25 2.2.5 Biodiversity Resources of Importance .................................................................................... 26 2.2.6 Livelihoods of Importance ....................................................................................................... 26 2.2.7 Ecosystem Services ............................................................................................................... 27 2.2.8 Climate Stressors, Risks, Impacts and Adaptive Responses ................................................. 27 2.2.9 Climate Change Risk Significance Rating .............................................................................. 38 2.3 LANDSCAPE 3 ANALYSIS ········································································39 Rwenzori Mountains National Park (RMNP) and Surrounding Communities ................. 39 Region: Albertine Rift ....................................................................................................................... 39 2.3.1 Location and Description ........................................................................................................ 40 DRAFT ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE RISKS TO CONSERVATION PROGRAMMING IN UGANDA | I 2.3.2 Unique Climate Characteristics .............................................................................................. 40 2.3.3 Climate Projections ................................................................................................................. 40 2.3.4 Non-Climate Stressors............................................................................................................ 40 2.3.5 Biodiversity Resources of Importance .................................................................................... 41 2.3.6 Livelihoods of Importance ....................................................................................................... 42 2.3.7 Ecosystem Services ............................................................................................................... 42 2.3.8 Climate Stressors, Risks, Impacts and Adaptive Responses ................................................. 43 2.3.9 Climate Change Risk Significance Rating .............................................................................. 51 2.4 LANDSCAPE 4 ANALYSIS ········································································52 Bwindi-Mgahinga Conservation Area (BMCA), Echuya Central Forest Reserve (ECFR) and Surrounding Communities .............................................................. 52 Region: Albertine Rift ....................................................................................................................... 52 2.4.1 Location and Description ........................................................................................................ 53 2.4.2 Unique Climate Characteristics .............................................................................................. 53 2.4.3 Climate Projections ................................................................................................................. 53 2.4.4 Non-Climate Stressors............................................................................................................ 53 2.4.5 Biodiversity Resources of Importance ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact of Climate Change at Lake Victoria
    East Africa Living Lakes Network, C/O OSIENALA (Friends of Lake Victoria). Dunga Beach Kisumu Ann Nabangala Obae. Coordinator. Phone: +254-20-3588681. Email: [email protected] Background It is the Second largest fresh water lake in the World and it is surrounded by three East African States: With 6% in Kenya; Tanzania 52% and Uganda 42%. It is Located at 0:21 0 North and 3:00 0 South of the Equator Lake Victoria has a total length of 3,440 kms and 240 kms wide from East to West and is 1,134 meters above sea level with maximum depth of 82m.Its surface area is 68,870 km 2, catchment area of 180,950 km 2 Generally shallow with maximum depth of 84 meters and mean depth of 40 meters Average inflows and out flows of Lake Victoria Type of flow Flow (m3/s) Percentage (%) Inflows Rain over Lake 3,631 82 Basin Discharge 778 18 Type of flow Flow ( m3/s) Percentage (%) Out flows Evaporation from lake -3,300 76 Nile River - 1,046 24 Balance +33 Sources of Lake Victoria from Kenyan water towers Sondu Miriu river Yala river Nzoia river Mara River Kuja river Impacts and effects Changes in water budget are respectively accompanied by water level fluctuation and promote thermal structures which result in nutrient and food web dynamics. Studies have proved that there is a positive correlation between water level and fish landings (Williams, l972) The abundant fish catches are highly correlated with rainfall and lake levels. The records show that the catches reduced to between 60% and 70% during the current reduction of water level in Nyanza Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of the Nile Basin the Many Eco for Their Liveli This Chapt Distribution, Functions and Contribution to Contribution Livelihoods They Provide
    important role particular imp into wetlands budget (Sutch 11 in the Blue N icantly 1110difi Wetlands of the Nile Basin the many eco for their liveli This chapt Distribution, functions and contribution to contribution livelihoods they provide. activities, ane rainfall (i.e. 1 Lisa-Maria Rebelo and Matthew P McCartney climate chan: food securit; currently eX' arc under tb Key messages water resour support • Wetlands occur extensively across the Nile Basin and support the livelihoods ofmillions of related ;;ervi people. Despite their importance, there are big gaps in the knowledge about the current better evalu: status of these ecosystems, and how populations in the Nile use them. A better understand­ systematic I ing is needed on the ecosystem services provided by the difl:erent types of wetlands in the provide. Nile, and how these contribute to local livelihoods. • While many ofthe Nile's wetlands arc inextricably linked to agricultural production systems the basis for making decisions on the extent to which, and how, wetlands can be sustainably used for agriculture is weak. The Nile I: • Due to these infi)fl11atio!1 gaps, the future contribution of wetlands to agriculture is poorly the basin ( understood, and wetlands are otten overlooked in the Nile Basin discourse on water and both the E agriculture. While there is great potential for the further development of agriculture and marsh, fen, fisheries, in particular in the wetlands of Sudan and Ethiopia, at the same time many that is stat wetlands in the basin are threatened by poor management practices and populations. which at \, In order to ensure that the future use of wetlands for agriculture will result in net benefits (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. LAKE OPETA WETLAND SYSTEM RAMSAR INFORMATION SHEET 1. Name and address of the RIS Compiler: Achilles Byaruhanga and Stephen Kigoolo NatureUganda Plot 83, Tufnel Drive, Kamwokya P. O Box 27034, Kampala - Uganda. Tel: 256 41 540719 Fax no: 256 41 533 528 E-mail: [email protected] 2. Date: 17 September 2005. 3. Country: The Republic of Uganda 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Lake Opeta Wetland System 5. Map of the Ramsar site: Hard copy: attached Digital (electronic) format: yes 6. Geographical coordinates: 34004" - 34024" E and 01033" - 01051" N,. 7. General Location: Lake Opeta and its surrounding swamps is located in north eastern Uganda, in four districts of Nakapiripirit (Namalu sub-county and Lorachat sub-county), Sironko (Bunambutye sub- county), Katakwi (Usuku county, Magoro sub-county) and Kumi (Kolir sub-county, Malera sub-county and Ongino sub-county). It is located 25 kms from Kumi town and the northern part borders a Wildlife Reserve, Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve and Teso Community Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP GEF Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Threatened Savanna Woodland in the Kidepo Critical Landscape in North Eastern Uganda
    Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP GEF Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Threatened Savanna Woodland in the Kidepo Critical Landscape in North Eastern Uganda Terminal Evaluation Report Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Threatened Savanna Protected Area Network Management & Building Capacity Woodland in the Kidepo Critical Landscape in North Eastern Uganda UNDPin PIMS Post-Conflict ID: 4592 SouthGEF Project Sudan ID: 4456 Country: Uganda Region: Africa Focal Area: Biodiversity Implementing Agency: United Nations Development Programme Executive: Ministry of Finance Implementing Partner: National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) Project Timeframe: July 2013 – May 2019 Prepared by: Richard Sobey, International Consultant / Team Leader Michael Mbogga, National Consultant September 2019 TE (UNDP PIMS #4592) Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP GEF Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Threatened Savanna Woodland in the Kidepo Critical Landscape in North Eastern Uganda Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 14 1.1. The project .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Uganda: an Assessment and Review
    Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2014, 6, 1297-1315 Published Online October 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jwarp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.614120 Water Resources of Uganda: An Assessment and Review Francis N. W. Nsubuga1,2*, Edith N. Namutebi3, Masoud Nsubuga-Ssenfuma2 1Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa 2National Environmental Consult Ltd., Kampala, Uganda 3Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kampala, Uganda Email: *[email protected] Received 1 August 2014; revised 26 August 2014; accepted 18 September 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Water resources of a country constitute one of its vital assets that significantly contribute to the socio-economic development and poverty eradication. However, this resource is unevenly distri- buted in both time and space. The major source of water for these resources is direct rainfall, which is recently experiencing variability that threatens the distribution of resources and water availability in Uganda. The annual rainfall received in Uganda varies from 500 mm to 2800 mm, with an average of 1180 mm received in two main seasons. The spatial distribution of rainfall has resulted into a network of great rivers and lakes that possess big potential for development. These resources are being developed and depleted at a fast rate, a situation that requires assessment to establish present status of water resources in the country. The paper reviews the characteristics, availability, demand and importance of present day water resources in Uganda as well as describ- ing the various issues, challenges and management of water resources of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008
    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS IN UGANDA Status and Trends 2008 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2008 Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Edited by: Ambrose R. B Mugisha and Julius Arinaitwe Map illustrations by: David Mushabe Graphic designs by: Some Graphics Ltd January 2009 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized without further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2009). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends 2008. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society About NatureUganda NatureUganda is a Non Governmental Organization working towards the conservation of species, sites and habitats not only for birds but other taxa too. It is the BirdLife partner in Uganda and a member of IUCN. The organization is involved in various research, conservation and advocacy work in many sites across the country. These three pillars are achieved through conservation projects, environmental education programmes and community involvement in conservation among others. All is aimed at promoting the understanding, appreciation and conservation of nature. For more information please contact: NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya. P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org DISCLAIMER This status report has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union (EuropeAid/ ENV/2007/132-278. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Birdlife International and can under no normal circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charcoal Grey Market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan (2021)
    COMMODITY REPORT BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan SIMONE HAYSOM I MICHAEL McLAGGAN JULIUS KAKA I LUCY MODI I KEN OPALA MARCH 2021 BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan ww Simone Haysom I Michael McLaggan Julius Kaka I Lucy Modi I Ken Opala March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank everyone who gave their time to be interviewed for this study. They would like to extend particular thanks to Dr Catherine Nabukalu, at the University of Pennsylvania, and Bryan Adkins, at UNEP, for playing an invaluable role in correcting our misperceptions and deepening our analysis. We would also like to thank Nhial Tiitmamer, at the Sudd Institute, for providing us with additional interviews and information from South Sudan at short notice. Finally, we thank Alex Goodwin for excel- lent editing. Interviews were conducted in South Sudan, Uganda and Kenya between February 2020 and November 2020. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simone Haysom is a senior analyst at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC), with expertise in urban development, corruption and organized crime, and over a decade of experience conducting qualitative fieldwork in challenging environments. She is currently an associate of the Oceanic Humanities for the Global South research project based at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Ken Opala is the GI-TOC analyst for Kenya. He previously worked at Nation Media Group as deputy investigative editor and as editor-in-chief at the Nairobi Law Monthly. He has won several journalistic awards in his career.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]
  • ———— “Mudo”: the Soga 'Little Red Riding Hood'
    LILLIAN BUKAAYI TIBASIIMA ———— º “Mudo”: The Soga ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ ABSTRACT This essay analyses the social underpinnings of the oral tale of “Mudo,” which belongs to the Aarne–Thompson tale type 333, along with a group of similar tales that resemble the action and movement of “Little Red Riding Hood.” Basic to the exposition is Adolf Bastian’s assertion of the fundamental similarity of ideas between all social groups. In the “Mudo” story and its Ugandan variants, the victim is a solitary little girl and the villain a male ogre who devises ways of eating her; the ogre is mostly successful, although in some variants the girl manages to escape. Although these tales come from a great range of cultures and different geographical locations, and the counterpart of the ogre in the European tales is a wolf in disguise, they share elements of plot, characteriza- tion, and motif, and address similar concerns. Introduction USOGA IS PART OF EAS TERN UGANDA, surrounded by water. The B Rev. Fredrick Kisuule Kaliisa1 notes: To the west is river Kiira (Nile) marking the boundary between Buganda and Busoga. To the East is river Mpologoma separating Busoga from Bukedi. To the North are river Mpologoma and Lake Kyoga, forming the boundary be- tween Busoga and Lango. To the south, is Lake Victoria (Nalubaale). It might be the result of the geographical location of Busoga that ogre stories were composed to warn the people against impending harm if they went out alone and stayed in secluded places. Nnalongo Lukude emphasizes this: Historically, Busoga was surrounded by bodies of water and forests, it was very bushy and as a result harboured many wild animals, some of which were man-eaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilenga & Eacop Projects with a Socio-Economic Interest for Uganda
    TILENGA & EACOP PROJECTS WITH A SOCIO-ECONOMIC INTEREST FOR UGANDA AND TANZANIA The teams of Total and its partners Tullow and CNOOC are currently working on an oil development project in Uganda, called Tilenga, and an oil pipeline project through Uganda and Tanzania, EACOP, which will transport the oil to the port of Tanga. For the two host countries, these projects will have a significant economic and social impact. A LONG HISTORY OF TOTAL A COMMITMENT TO PRESERVING A COMMITMENT TO MINIMIZING ADDRESSING THE CONCERNS IN THE REGION THE REGION'S SENSITIVE THE IMPACT ON LOCAL POPULATIONS OF THE IMPACTED PEOPLE with a presence in Uganda for ENVIRONMENT by limiting relocations by keeping them informed, getting 60 years and in Tanzania through a mitigation hierarchy and supporting the individuals them involved and considering for almost 50 years. approach “Avoid – Reduce/ concerned. their opinions into each stage Restore – Compensate” of project implementation. and concrete actions. SOUDAN DU SUD ÉTHIOPIE Murchison Falls National Park The EACOP project involves UGANDA The Tilenga project the construction of an comprises oil exploration, underground hydrocarbon Tilenga a crude oil processing transport pipeline starting Hoima plant, underground just inside the Uganda border pipelines, and (Hoima District - 297km) and Lake infrastructure in the extending through Tanzania Albert Buliisa and Nwoya (1147km) to an oil depot and districts of Uganda. an offshore loading terminal in Tanga. Lake Edward Lake Victoria Bukoba RWANDA KENYA BURUNDI DEMOCRATIC EACOP REPUBLIC INDIAN OCEAN OF CONGO TANZANIA Singida Tanga SEPTEMBER 2019 ZAMBIE MOZAMBIQUE MALAWI SOUDAN DU SUD THIOPIE FOCUS ON THE TILENGA PROJECT Total E&P Uganda, fully aware of the project's sensitive nature, has placed particular emphasis on environmental and societal issues, with a specific commitment to leaving the site in a better state than it was before the work started and to limiting residents' relocations as much as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes
    Natural Resource Use and Management Series No. 14 Guidelines for Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes 2014 1 Guidelines for Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes 2 Natural Resource Use and Management GUIDELINES FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized only with further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commer- cial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda, Tree Talk, Tropical Biology Association (2014), Guidelines for Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes in Uganda, NatureUganda, Tree Talk, Tropical Biology Association. Copyright ©NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society Bwindi Mgahinga Conservation Trust (BMCT) Building Plot 1 Katalima Crescent, Lower Naguru P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email: [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org Twitter: @NatureUganda Facebook: NatureUganda i Guidelines for Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Guidelines to Conservation of Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes were produced with funding from the British American Tobacco Biodiversity Partnership (BATBP) under the project ‘Addressing sustainable management for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in tobacco growing regions of Uganda’. This project is coordinated by Tropical
    [Show full text]