DOCSLIB.ORG

External Stakeholder Input Report: Region 2 Community – New York City, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
External Stakeholder Input Report: Region 2 Community – New York City, New York Supplemental Document to the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness: June 2010 External Stakeholder Input Report: Region 2 Community – New York City, New York U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness External Stakeholder Input Report: Region 2 Community Stakeholder Input March 5, 2010 New York, New York Attending: Daniel Altilio, United Way of Hudson County Kristin Green, Hudson County Division of Housing Manny Alvarado, HUD and Community Development Nereida Andino, Bank of America Tory Gunsolley, Newark Housing Authority Barbara Andrews, HHS Erin Healy, Corporation for Supportive Housing Steven Auerbach, NYRD, ORO, HRSA, HHS Arvernetta Henry, Picture the Homeless Kristin Barlup, Robin Hood Foundation Valentina Holston, Love and Wisdom, Inc George Bates, 820 River Street Inc. Vincent Hom, HUD Sarah Benjamin, Eastern Suffolk BOCES Julie Irwin, Dept. of Veterans Affairs Michael Berg, Family of Woodstock Kathy Jaworski, Ocean County Dept. of Human Doug Berman, Care For the Homeless Services Michelle Billups, HHS/HRSA Selene Kaye, American Civil Liberties Union Lisa Black, New York City Dept of Homeless Services Robert Kelty, Coalition for the Homeless Nicole Branca, Supportive Housing Network of NY Adam Kirkman, CARES, Inc. Mary Brosnahan, Coalition for the Homeless Eduardo Laguerre, NAICA Richard Brown, Monarch Housing Associates Robert Landolfi, Ocean County Dept of Human William Burnett, Picture the Homeless Services Susanne Byrne, York Street Project Herb Levine, Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness Bill Chong, New York City Department of Youth and Carleton Lewis, Newark HUD Community Development NJ L'Heureux Jr, Queens Federation of Churches Frank Clark, Picture the Homeless Diane Louard‐Michel, Corporation for Supportive Henry Comas, New York HUD Housing Barbara Conanan, Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Everett Lo, SSA Centers Eileen Lynch, NYC Dept of Homeless Services Bill Davis Maria McGinty, SW BOCES Etta Denk, Bank of America Loren McMahon, Department of Homeless Services DeBoRah Dickerson, Picture the Homeless Lori McNeil, Homelessness Outreach and Prevention Benjamin Dineen, United Way of Hudson County, NJ Project at Urban Justice Center Virginia Edwards, Monmouth County Community Lauren Mendenhall, William F. Ryan Community Development Health Center Daniel Farrell, Lenox Hill Neighborhood House Sam J. Miller, Picture the Homeless Rachel Fee, NYC HPD Karl Muehter, South Jersey Behavioral Health Antonio Figueroa, Orange County Housing Resources Consortium Susan Nayowith, NYC DHS Jyoti Folch, Department of Homeless Services Mark Neal, Department of Homeless Services Carmel Galasso, UNITED WAY OF HUDSON COUNTY Jacqueline Nieves‐De La Paz, Harlem United Kathy Germain, Rural Ulster Preservation Company Jessie Ochoa, CSUSB Adam Glantz, HUD Timothy O'Hanlon, NYC, Dept of Housing Juanita Gonzalez‐Charlot, HRSA/ORO/NYRD Preservation and Development. Christy Parque, Homeless Services United UNITED STATES INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS – FSP Supplemental Document #12 1 Supplemental Document to the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness: June 2010 External Stakeholder Input Report: Region 2 Community – New York City, New York Alexandra Pavlakis, The Institute for Children and Jeffrey Senter, Urban Justice Center, Mental Health Poverty Project / Project FAIR Annette Peters, Westchester County Dept of Jody Sherman, Harlem United Community Mental Health Robert Signoracci, US Dept. of HUD Stephen Piasecki, Supportive Housing Network of Ophelia Smith, Women In Need, Inc. New York Karen Talarico, Cathedral Kitchen Russell Pinsley, Picture the Homeless Taiisa Telesford, Monarch Housing Associates Alison Recca‐Ryan, Corporation for Supportive Connie Tempel, Corporation for Supportive Housing Housing Catherine Trapani, New Destiny Housing Corporation Jean Rice, Picture the Homeless Felipe Vargas, The Doe Fund, Inc. Loretta Richardson, TD Bank, N.A. Susana Vilardell, NYC Dept. of Education Anthony Sabia, Covenant House Bobby Watts, Care For the Homeless Fred Sambataro, The Nicholson Foundation Joanna Weissman, NYC Dept. of Homeless Services Earlene Sealey, HUD Aurora Zepeda, Homes for the Homeless Sara Zuiderveen, NYC Dept of Homeless Services We thank you for your participation and apologize to anyone inadvertently left off this list. We tried our best to read the handwriting of each person who signed in for the meeting. USICH Staff Anthony Love and Michael German Facilitators Nancy Fritsche Eagan and Martin Siesta; Graphic Artists: Kelvy Bird and Drew Dernavich Meeting Summary Anthony Love welcomed the group and facilitated introductions. He then gave an overview of the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness and the framework for the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness. The Plan will serve as a roadmap for joint action by the 19 Council agencies to guide the development of programs and budget proposals towards a set of measurable targets to pursue over a five‐year period. USICH is centering its Plan on the belief – the moral foundation – “no one should experience homelessness—no one should be without a safe, stable place to call home.” There are five areas of concentration: Preventing and ending homelessness among 1) families with children, 2) youth, 3) Veterans, and 4) adults experiencing chronic homelessness; as well as 5) in the context of state and local communities, mobilize community participation, forge partnerships, and align resources. The Council affirmed six core values to be reflected in the Plan: • Homelessness is unacceptable. • There are no “homeless people,” but rather people who have lost their homes who deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. • Homelessness is expensive; it is better to invest in solutions. • Homelessness is solvable; we have learned a lot about what works. • Homelessness can be prevented. • There is strength in collaboration and USICH can make a difference. The Plan’s strategies will: • identify and target to reach and match people with appropriate interventions; UNITED STATES INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS – FSP Supplemental Document #12 2 Supplemental Document to the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness: June 2010 External Stakeholder Input Report: Region 2 Community – New York City, New York • ensure access by people to needed programs, housing and services; • retool crisis response to avert and shorten entry into homelessness; • provide housing and supports; • build opportunity such as jobs and education; • enhance capacity in the service system to deliver quality; and • document results. The meeting facilitators introduced the World Café process, a conversational process that builds on previous conversations as people move between groups, cross‐pollinate ideas, and discover new insights into the questions being discussed. Thank you to volunteers from Art of Hosting for their help to facilitate these conversations. Small groups of three to five participants each discussed question one and recorded their key answers. After a short report‐back session, the small groups were randomly re‐mixed and the new groups discussed question two. The process was repeated for a discussion and recording of insights and answers to question three. The questions for discussion: 1. What do we need to understand about the scope and causes of homelessness? 2. What should be the key goals and strategies of the plan that will take us toward that vision? 3. How can federal resources and practices be wisely aligned and cost‐effectively applied to amplify our state/local work? Before concluding the meeting, Anthony outlined the next steps in the development of the Plan and attendees were thanked for their participation. Following the meeting, the responses were categorized into themes. The percentage of comments for each theme is listed for each question followed by the text of every comment, listed alphabetically by theme. USICH has used our best efforts to ensure accuracy in capturing and categorizing comments. Question 1: What do we need to understand about the scope and causes of homelessness? 12% Causes – Systemic Factors Comments suggesting that factors such as entrenched poverty or inadequate education to prepare for future self‐sufficiency cause homelessness. 11% Impressions of Comments about the experience of homelessness itself. Homelessness 11% Causes – Economic Comments stating that homelessness is caused by faltering local economies, a disconnect between income and housing costs, or lack of employment opportunities. 7% Investment Target – Housing Comments suggesting increased funding for housing solutions, including more affordable housing, housing vouchers, PSH, and other specialized housing models. 7% Causes – Myriad of Factors Comments indicating there are numerous causes of homelessness, as opposed to one specific cause. UNITED STATES INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS – FSP Supplemental Document #12 3 Supplemental Document to the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness: June 2010 External Stakeholder Input Report: Region 2 Community – New York City, New York 7% Mainstream System Comments on the responsibility of mainstream systems to address Accountability homelessness, and those that pertain to assessment and removal of barriers that drive people to homelessness or complicate access to solutions. 6% Definitions Comments requesting consistent definitions and common requirements to document homelessness and other related terms. 6% Research Comments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S P R I N G 20 18
    S P R I N G 2018 URBAN REVIEW LETTER FROM THE EDITORS A magazine of the Hunter College Planning is inherently political; this is something that Hunter students know well. The Introduction Department of to Planning course has many students reading entire books on problem solving and policy analysis, Urban Affairs & Planning as we aspire to not simply write plans from afar but to affect change, using our skills as planners to SPRING ‘18 advocate within the imperfect and at times broken realm of politics. STAFF However, politics is not simply a tool to accomplish goals of planning. Planning itself is a powerful Editors in Chief political tool, one that can be used to accomplish and demonstrate political goals. A zoning change, a Aly Hassell parking limit, or a design for a park are not technical planning decisions but are pronouncements of Atara Lindenbaum priorities, of political goals, and of particular visions of space and community. Our responsibility as future planners is to probe this technical side of planning, determining its larger context. Layout and Design Editor Aly Hassell This issue of Urban Review had the privilege to feature two accomplished and active planners: Com- missioner Mitchell Silver of the NYC Parks Department and Dr. Lester King, Sustainability Planner Writers James Hull in Houston, TX. Both Silver and King emphasize the need for proper community engagement and Beatriz Gil dialogue. Vicky Garvey Ranjana Venkatesh It is time to ask, however, if this focus on process, on stakeholder engagement and communication Atara Lindenbaum suffices. Equitable planning processes may be inherently positive improvements, but our cities, our Andy Lawson Michael Kralovich people, need equitable results as well.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homeless and the Right to Remain in Public Space
    RUDIN_PUBLISHERPROOF_3.28.18 .DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 4/14/18 9:16 PM “YOU CAN’T BE HERE”: THE HOMELESS AND THE RIGHT TO REMAIN IN PUBLIC SPACE DAVID RUDIN∞ ABSTRACT In cities throughout the country, homeless individuals are continuously relocated from place to place and faced with the quandary that by engaging in basic life activities they are breaking the law. Many of these individuals and their legal advocates have argued that laws prohibiting the homeless from sleeping or sitting down in public make it effectively impossible for them to exist, violating the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments and the right to travel derived from the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the vast majority of courts have rejected these arguments because they do not readily fit into existing doctrines. This article argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges provides a mold for homeless individuals and their advocates to recast challenges to anti-homeless ordinances and regularly-issued move-along orders into a more compelling form. In Obergefell, the Supreme Court recognized the right to same- sex marriage by looking at the confluence of several different lines of case law and allowing concerns for equality to guide its substantive due process analysis. This article follows the mode of substantive due process analysis that Obergefell endorsed and focuses on the connections between the right to movement, the Eighth Amendment, Fourth Amendment privacy concerns, the attention to inequality motivating applications of the right to travel, and the Court’s vagueness cases as they relate to vagrancy and public spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Community Controlled, Deeply Affordable Housing a RESOURCE TOOLKIT for COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & ALLIED COMMUNITY-BASED HOUSING DEVELOPERS
    Creating Community Controlled, Deeply Affordable Housing A RESOURCE TOOLKIT FOR COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & ALLIED COMMUNITY-BASED HOUSING DEVELOPERS PARTNERS FOR DIGNITY & RIGHTS Spring 2021 Date Spring 2021 Authors Peter Sabonis Partners for Dignity & Rights Zachary Murray Up South/Down South Community Development Editors Philippa Rizopoulos Ben Palmquist Acknowledgements We would like to thank the community housing developers that provided the data and time that made this report possible. Steve King, Executive Director at Oakland CLT Keith Cooley, Director of Asset Management at SF CLT Rick Lewis, Executive Director at the Bay Area CLT Berkeley Athena Bernkopf, Project Coordinator at East Harlem/ El Barrio CLT Michael Monte, Chief Executive Officer at Champlain Housing Trust Nora Lictash, Executive Director of the Women’s Community Revitalization Project Julius Kimbrough, Executive Director of the Crescent City Community Land Trust Thanks also to the Right to the City Alliance, the New York City Community Land Initiative and the New Economy Project with whom we partnered to host the “Affordable for Whom?” conference in August 2019 that led to this report, and to Jenny Akchin, a former staff member at Picture the Homeless, who envisioned the value of information sharing among CLTs that were reaching levels of deep affordability. This report was made possible by a grant from Oak Foundation. Thank you to Deirdre Reznik, DPI Creative for design and production of this report. Creating Community Controlled, Deeply Affordable Housing Contents 2
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of CLT Bibliography
    International Community Land Trust Bibliography Selected and Compiled by John Emmeus Davis [Most recent update: August 1, 2021] Abrams, Amanda. 2019. Helping at-risk homeowners stay put with a land trust. Shelterforce (April 25). Available online at: https://shelterforce.org/2019/04/25/a-land-trust-model-for-seniors/ ———. 2020. Lessons from the last housing crisis: how to get control of properties. Shelterforce (September 17). Available online at: https://shelterforce.org/2020/09/17/lessons-from-the-last- housing-crisis/ Abromowitz, David M. 1991. An essay on community land trusts: Towards permanently affordable housing. Mississippi Law Journal 61: 663–682. ———. 1992. Long-term affordability, community land trusts and ground leases. ABA Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law 1(2): 5–6, 17. ———. 2000. An essay on community land trusts: Toward permanently affordable housing. In Property and values, ed. Charles Geisler and Gail Daneker, 213–231. Washington, DC: Island Press. ———. 2008. Addressing foreclosures: A great American dream neighborhood stabilization plan. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Abromowitz, David, and Roz Greenstein. 2008. A foreclosure-free option. Boston Globe, January 23. Abromowitz, David, and Kirby White. 2006. Deed restrictions and community land trust ground leases: Protecting long term affordable homeownership. Housing News Network, Journal of the Florida Housing Coalition 22 (May): 7–10, 24. Abromowitz, David, and Kirby White. 2010. Deed restrictions and community land trust ground leases: Two Methods of establishing affordable homeownership restrictions. In The community land trust reader, ed. John Emmeus Davis, 327-334. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Aernouts, Nele and Michael Ryckewaert. 2017. Beyond housing: on the role of commoning in the establishment of a community land trust project.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report by the New York City Chapter of the Right to the City Alliance About the Authors: Rttc-Nyc Member Organizations
    PEOPLE WITHOUT HOMES & HOMES WITHOUT PEOPLE: A COUNT OF VACANT CONDOS IN SELECT NYC NEIGHBORHOODS A REPORT BY THE NEW YORK CITY CHAPTER OF THE RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE ABOUT THE AUTHORS: RTTC-NYC MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS CAAAV ORGANIZING ASIAN COMMUNITIES works to build grassroots GOLES is a neighborhood housing and community power across diverse poor and preservation organization that serves the working-class Asian immigrant and refugee Lower East Side (LES) of Manhattan and is NEW YORK CITY AIDS HOUSING communities in NYC. CAAAV led canvassing dedicated to tenants’ rights, homelessness NETWORK (NYCAHN)/VOCAL is a efforts in the Lower East Side. prevention, economic development and membership organization comprised of community revitalization. GOLES supported and led by low-income people living canvassing efforts in the Lower East Side. with HIV/AIDS. NYCAHN led canvassing efforts in the South Bronx. COMMUNITY VOICES HEARD (CVH) organizes low-income people of color in New York City, Yonkers and the Mid-Hudson Valley, focusing on welfare reform, job creation, and public housing. CVH led JEWS FOR RACIAL AND ECONOMIC PICTURE THE HOMELESS (PTH) canvassing efforts in Harlem. JUSTICE (JFREJ) is a membership-based is an organization founded on the principle organization that engages Jews to pursue that people who are homeless must become and win racial and economic justice in an organized, effective voice for systemic partnership with Jewish and allied people change. PTH led canvassing efforts in the of color, low-income, and immigrant com- South Bronx. munities in New York City. JFREJ supported canvassing efforts in the Lower East Side. FABULOUS INDEPENDENT EDUCATED RADICALS FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT (FIERCE) is a membership-based organiza- TEACHERS UNITE is the only membership tion building the leadership of lesbian, gay, organization of public school educators bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) building power to demand that our union youth of color in NYC.
    [Show full text]
  • S E M I N a R I N P L a N N I N G T H E O
    S E M I N A R I N P L A N N I N G T H E O R Y Fall semester 2016 Tuesday, 5:00-8:00 pm CRP 391D | WMB 3.116 Instructor: Bjørn Sletto Office: SUT 3.124B Phone: 512-853-0770 Office hours: Wed 2:00-5:00, Thu 2-:00-5:00 -Reading schedule subject to change- Introduction to the course: This course provides an introduction to the principal intellectual traditions and debates in what is loosely termed ‘planning theory.’ We will review the paradigmatic schools of thought that have informed planning scholarship and practice, and attempt to draw connections between currents in social science theory and planning theory. We will consider key questions in planning, such as, Should planning theory primarily be ‘practical’ or should it be ‘critical’? Should planning theorists focus their attention on improving the planning ‘process?’ Or should they instead develop normative visions for the ‘good city?’ But beyond this review of planning theory, we will consider how planning theory informs, and is shaped by, broader intellectual concerns and phenomena associated with the contemporary urban. After all, planning can’t be separated from social context. Theories and practices both inform and are shaped by shifting political economies of the past and present, by a variety of cultural and intellectual traditions, and by multiple imaginaries of the City. In the course we will examine how old and new imaginaries and conceptualizations of the urban articulate with planning theory, and how planning theory in turn informs and is shaped by planning and development practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    ! ! ! ! ! ! WILL!‘THE!POOR!BE!WITH!YOU!ALWAYS’?:! TOWARDS!A!METHODOLOGICAL!APPROACH!OF!READING!THE!BIBLE!WITH!THE! POOR! ! ! REVEREND&ELIZABETH&ARMEN&THEOHARIS& & & & & & & & & & Dissertation&Committee:& Rev.&Dr.&Brigitte&Kahl& Rev.&Dr.&Hal&Taussig& Dr.&Richard&Horsley& Dr.&Aliou&Niang& & & & & & & & & SubmitteD&in&partial&fulfillment& of&the&requirements& for&the&degree&of& Doctor&of&Philosophy& at&Union&Theological& Seminary&in&the&City&of&New&York& May&2014& ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Copyright!©!2014!Elizabeth!Armen!Theoharis! All!rights!reserved! Acknowledgements. ! ! I!want!to!thank!the!many!people!who!have!contributed!to!this!dissertation!over!the! past!ten!years!and!the!work!on!which!this!dissertation!stands.!Thank!you!to!the! teachers!in!the!classrooms!and!streets!who!have!insisted!that!poverty!defiles!our! world!and!defies!our!God.!Thank!you!to!the!students!who!have!been!committed!to! learning!as!we!lead,!walking!as!we!talk,!educating!as!we!organize.!Thank!you!to!all! the!“Poverty!Scholars”!who!have!dedicated!their!time!and!talents!to!not!just! improving!their!lives!but!ending!poverty!for!all.!Thanks!especially!to!the!leaders!and! participants!in!Poverty!Initiative!activities,!including!the!Poverty!Scholars! Leadership!School,!Potter's!Field!Campaign!of!Picture!the!Homeless!and!Interfaith! Friends!of!Potter's!Field,!"Reading!the!Bible!with!the!Poor",!“The!Gospel!of! Matthew”,!and!“The!Gospel!of!Paul:!Poverty!and!Spirituality”!semesterMlong!classes,! Poverty!Initiative!immersion!courses,!Poverty!Scholars!Strategic!Dialogues,!Roman!
    [Show full text]
  • From Prison to Homeless Shelter: Camp Laguardia and the Political Economy of an Urban Infrastructure
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2018 From Prison to Homeless Shelter: Camp LaGuardia and the Political Economy of an Urban Infrastructure Christian D. Siener The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2880 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] From Prison to Homeless Shelter Camp LaGuardia and the Political Economy of an Urban Infrastructure Christian D. Siener A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Earth and Environmental Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 Christian D. Siener All Rights Reserved ii From Prison to Homeless Shelter Camp LaGuardia and the Political Economy of an Urban Infrastructure by Christian D. Siener This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Earth and Environmental Sciences in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ ______________________________ Date Ruth Wilson Gilmore Chair of Examining Committee _________________________ ______________________________ Date Cindi Katz Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Marianna Pavlovskaya Monica Varsanyi THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT From Prison to Homeless Shelter Camp LaGuardia and the Political Economy of an Urban Infrastructure Christian D. Siener Advisor: Ruth Wilson Gilmore At this time of increasing housing insecurity, recent reforms in homeless shelter policy have attracted the attention of scholars and activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Necesita De Un Cambio Ontológico En La Teorización De Las Prácticas De La Planifica- Acto I: La Esquizofrenia Ción
    Territorios ISSN: 0123-8418 ISSN: 2215-7484 [email protected] Universidad del Rosario Colombia Miraftab, Faranak Insurgencia, planificación y la perspectiva de un urbanismo humano* , ** Territorios, núm. 38, 2018, Enero-Junio, pp. 215-233 Universidad del Rosario Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35755496010 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Territorios 38 / Bogotá, 2018, pp. 215-233 ISSN: 0123-8418 ISSNe: 2215-7484 Insurgencia, planificación y la perspectiva de un urbanismo humano*,** Faranak Miraftab*** Muchas gracias por esta presentación. Inicialmente, me gustaría agradecer a la comisión organizadora del World Planning Schools Conference por haberme invitado para dar * El presente artículo fue apertura a este importante diálogo entre colegas del mundo entero. Es una verdadera publicado originalmente honra y un privilegio dirigirme a un grupo de estudiosos de renombre internacional, en portugués en la Revista Brasilera de Estudios Ur- siendo incluso que de varios de ellos sigo aprendiendo. Como siempre, el conocimien- bano Regionales RBEUR to es una producción colectiva, y, por lo tanto, lo que voy a compartir con ustedes en Vol. 18, n.o 3 de sep.-dic. el día de hoy son mis conocimientos, adquiridos a través del diálogo con activistas y del 2016, pp. 363-377. Es- académicos de todo el mundo. ta traducción cuenta con la autorización del comité No es necesario decirle a esta audiencia que vivimos en un momento de crisis, editorial de dicha revista y una crisis global que no es solamente una crisis del capitalismo, sino también de la de la autora.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Trusts-Nyc4-14
    by Oksana Mironova April 29th, 2014, http://urbanomnibus.net/2014/04/the-value-of-land-how-community-land- trusts-maintain-housing-affordability. Affordable housing is on New York City’s mind. A critical mass of civic organizations, academic institutions, city agencies, advocacy groups, and others are pondering the essential and perennial issue of how to ensure that the city becomes affordable for the extraordinarily diverse population that makes it work. What’s more, the conversation is riding a new wave of perceived political support from the de Blasio administration, which has tapped leading academics and esteemed private and public sector figures to deliver on its ambitious promise to build or preserve 200,000 units of affordable housing in ten years. With the details of the Mayor’s plan due to be released May 1st, we will undoubtedly be hearing a great deal of commentary about policy and implementation — development sites, low-income housing tax credits, preservation, NYCHA reforms — for weeks to come. At the same time, a decades-old strategy to maintain housing affordability is finding a groundswell of support from an increasingly diverse group of stakeholders. A community land trust (CLT) is an alternative model that separates the ownership of property from the ownership of the land on which that property is built. In effect, organized citizens remove land from the private, speculative market where its value is difficult to control. Below, housing advocate Oksana Mironova charts the origins of this approach, explaining how it has become an appealing solution to problems affecting communities across the country. In so doing, Mironova touches on the current effort underway to bring a new CLT pilot project to East Harlem as well as the adaptations that would allow a traditionally hyper-local and community-driven project to scale up to the city-wide level.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dream Denied: the Criminalization of Homelessness in U.S. Cities
    A Dream Denied: The Criminalization of Homelessness in U.S. Cities Photo courtesy of castanet.net A Report by The National Coalition for the Homeless and The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty January 2006 ABOUT THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS Founded in 1984, the National Coalition for the Homeless (NCH) is a private, non-profit, national advocacy organization that exists to educate all levels of society in order to identify and put to an end the social and economic causes of homelessness. NCH is the nation’s oldest and largest national homelessness advocacy organization, comprised of activists, service providers, and persons who are, or have been, homeless striving toward a single goal – to end homelessness. It is the mission of NCH to create the systemic and attitudinal changes necessary to prevent and end homelessness, while concurrently working to increase the capacity of local supportive housing and service providers to better meet the urgent needs of those families and individuals now homeless in their communities. NCH focuses its work on four policy areas: civil rights of those who are without homes, housing that is affordable to those with the lowest incomes, accessible/comprehensive health care and other needed support services, and livable incomes that make it possible to afford the basic necessities of life. The strategies we use to implement our mission are: litigation, lobbying, policy analysis, public education, community organizing, research, and providing technical assistance. For more information about our organization, membership, and access to publications such as this report, please see the form at the end of this report or visit our website at www.nationalhomeless.org Board of Directors Bob Erlenbusch Cheryl Barnes Roosevelt Darby, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Repurposing Abandoned Residential Infrastructure in New York City
    REPURPOSING ABANDONED RESIDENTIAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN NEW YORK CITY TO CURB HOMELESSNESS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Ramya Ramanathan March 19, 2018 Advisor: Prof. Malo A. Hutson Reader: Prof. Katherine D. Dunham Ramya Ramanathan | Thesis 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The culmination of this year long research would not have been possible without the relentless support of my thesis advisor, Prof. Malo Hutson. His belief in my vision and motto has been instrumental in pursuing my research goals. I am grateful for the support of Columbia University GSAPP for sending me to Los Angeles to study this critical urban issue. The valuable guidance provided by my reader, Prof. Kate Dunham has reinforced this study. I am lucky to have met her this semester and gain her support for this study. I am thankful to my colleagues and seniors at the New York State Association for Affordable Housing (NYSAFAH), who have given their inputs and thoughts towards this research topic and introduced me to many experts in the field of housing. Through the course of this research, I got an opportunity to interview and interact with many professionals, all of whose suggestions and critiques have taken this research from strength to strength. I am grateful to every one of these individuals, especially Ms. Jennifer Guzman, who not only gave me a lot of time but also provided useful tips and ideas to work towards. Last, but of course never the least, I shall forever be grateful to my parents who gave me this incredible opportunity to be a part of this legendary institution, Columbia University.
    [Show full text]