Dissertations 2000-2011
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Weiblichkeit Und Ästhetisches Handeln Bei Zeitgenössischen Bildenden Künstlerinnen 1975-1990
Weiblichkeit und ästhetisches Handeln bei zeitgenössischen bildenden Künstlerinnen 1975-1990 Aulikki Eromäki Ingrid Wagner-Kantuser Weiblichkeit und ästhetisches Handeln bei zeitgenössischen bildenden Künstlerinnen 1975-1990 Aulikki Eromäki Ingrid Wagner-Kantuser Jahr der Einreichung beim Promotionsausschuss der Fakultät der Universität der Künste Berlin: 2002 Tag der Disputation: 08.07.2002 Gutachter: Prof. Helmut Hartwig Prof. Dr. Renate Berger Prof. Dr. Sigrid Schade Weiblichkeit und ästhetisches Handeln bei zeitgenössischen bildenden Künstlerinnen 1975-1990 S. 9 Einleitung (AE/IW-K) TEIL 1: Weiblichkeit und hohe Kunst als unvereinbarer Gegensatz: Grundlagen und Konzeptualisierung eines Forschungsgegenstandes S. 16 1. Zum Zusammenhang von Kunst und Geschlechterideologien (AE) 1.1 Mythen und Diskurse als Träger von Vorstellungen über Kunst und Weiblichkeit (AE) S. 21 1.2 Genese und Wirkungsgeschichte des Künstlerbegriffes (AE) S. 22 1.2.1 Wirkungsgeschichte des Künstlerbildes (AE) S. 24 1.2.2 Künstlermythen in der Moderne (AE) S. 27 1.2.3 Künstlerhabitus (AE) S. 28 1.2.4 Selbsternennung und Künstlerbiographik (AE) S. 30 1.3 Ein neuer Blick auf Künstlermythen: feministische Perspektiven (IW-K) 1.3.1 “Geschlecht” in Künstlerforschung und Künstlerbiographik (IW-K) S. 33 1.3.2 Die Besetzung einer Leerstelle: die schöpferische Künstlerin (IW-K) S. 36 1.4 Von der Frauen-Kunst-Bewegung zu Geschlechterdifferenz und Dekonstruktion: Entwicklungen in Theoriebildung und Forschung (IW-K) 1.4.1 Theorie aus der Bewegung: feministische Spurensuche(IW-K) S. 39 1.4.2 Theorien der Geschlechterdifferenz (IW-K) S. 43 1.4.3 Dekonstruktiver Feminismus und Kunst (IW-K) S. 46 2. Zu den Bausteinen des Selbstentwurfs als Künstlerin (AE) 2.1 Weiblichkeit lernen – zur Geschlechtsrollenidentität (AE) S. -
Art and Social Change a Critical Reader
ART AND SOCIAL CHANGE A CRITICAL READER EDITED BY WILL BRADLEY AND CHARLES ESCHE TATE PUBLISHING IN ASSOCIATION WITH AFTERALL First published 2007 by order of the Tate Trustees by Tate Publishing, a division of Tate Enterprises Ltd Millbank, London sw1p 4rg www.tate.org.uk/publishing In association with Afterall Central Saint Martins College of Art & Design, University of the Arts London 107–109 Charing Cross Road London wc2h 0du Copyright © Tate, Afterall 2007 Individual contributions © the authors 2007 unless otherwise specified Artworks © the artists or their estates unless otherwise specified All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-85437-626-8 Distributed in the United States and Canada by Harry N. Abrams Inc., New York Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Library of Congress Control Number: 2007934790 Designed by Kaisa Lassinaro, Sara De Bondt Printed by Graphicom SPA, Italy CONTENTS 99 Deutschland Deutschland Über Alles Kurt Tucholsky and John Heartfield Preface [7] Charles Esche 104 Bauhaus no.3, The Students Voice Kostufra Introduction [9] Will Bradley 106 The Fall of Hannes Meyer Kostufra Colour plates [25] 108 Letter, August 1936 PART I – 1871 Felicia Browne 36 Letters, October 1870–April 1871 110 We Ask Your Attention Gustave Courbet British Surrealist Group 29 October 1870 18 March 1871 115 Vision in Motion 7 April 1871 László Moholy-Nagy 30 April 1871 PART III – 1968 40 Socialism from the Root Up William Morris and E. -
ILR Consolidated Table of Cases
CONSOLIDATED TABLE OF CASES ARRANGED ALPHABETICALLY VOLUMES 1—125 Notes : This table of cases lists as comprehensively as possible, in alphabetical order, all cases reproduced or reported in the Annual Digest /International Law Reports, entering cases under all common variants of their title. It should be noted that many cases appearing in the AD/ILR do not have a title as such in their original version (e.g. in jurisdictions where the practice is to use case numbers rather than titles). There are other circumstances (e.g. ICJ cases) where to include the full formal title (including the introductory ‘Case concerning’) would be misleading in an alphabetical table. Such cases are listed under the key element[s] (e.g. ‘Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955’ rather than ‘Case concerning ...’). The full formal titles are used, where they exist, in the table of cases by jurisdiction. ILR practice, in the presentation of cases and in the treatment of cases referred to and in the matter of cross-references, has varied considerably over the years. So far as practicable, the current table brings earlier tables into conformity with current practice. Page references in earlier tables have accordingly been deleted where they contained no more than a cross- reference or a direction to another part of the volume where treatment of the case could be found. Where, in the Annual Digest in particular, a long extract from a case has been included, this has been treated as a full report rather than a note – ‘long’, of course, being a variable concept. Current ILR practice is, wherever appropriate, to use English in case titles (e.g. -
Hawarian Humane Society People for Aniitjals
(m Hawarian Humane Society People for aniitjals. A«i»ials for people. 2/00 Waiatae Avenue Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 808.356.2200 • HawalianHumane.orq Date: Feb. 21, 2018 To: Chair Rep. Scott Nishimoto Vice Chair Rep. Joy San Buenaventura and Members of the Judiciary Committee Submitted By: Stephanie Kendrick, Public Policy Advocate Hawaiian Humane Society, 808-356-2217 RE: Testimony in support of HB2072, HDl: Relating to HRS 711-1109 Thursday, Feb. 22, 2018, 2 p.m., Capitol room 325 The Hawaiian Humane Society supports the passage of House Bill 2072, which would prohibit the use of specific tethering equipment and techniques that are injurious to dogs. However, we oppose the proposed amendments reducing the penalties for a tethering violation. We understand the intent of the penalty change is to compel compliance with the new law without imposing a misdemeanor charge. But as the animal service provider for Oahu, we can attest that our humane investigators already use education when possible to modify behavior. Citations are issued and charges are brought only if attempts at education have failed to change illegal behavior and there is documented evidence of harm to one or more animals. In recent years the Legislature has strengthened animal cruelty penalties to recognize the serious nature of these crimes. These amendments would erode those efforts. We do agree that psychological counseling (page 5, line 13 through page6, line 3) may be a useful tool for rehabilitating animal cruelty offenders. We would support the addition of that option to the existing sentencing guidelines for all animal cruelty cases.