2 Layout and Use of Signals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 Layout and Use of Signals Part 6 Section 2 LAYOUT OF SIGNALS Issued May 1995 2 Layout and Use of Signals 2.1 General frame is shown between the signalman and the track. Locating the frame in this position has an Signals are provided to control the movement of effect on the numbering of the equipment con- trains and to inform the driver whether it is safe trolled by the box. to proceed. Their location is dictated largely by the track layout, the relevant Government Department’s minimum requirements and, to 2.1.2 Lever numbering some extent, by the frequency of train movements. Coupled with this are the variations in practice The levers in a frame are arranged in a straight that occurred from company to company. At one line and numbered consecutively with number 1 end of the scale there were companies that provid- always on the signalman’s left as he faces the ed signals for every conceivable movement while frame. The normal position of the levers is back in others only used the bare minimum required by the frame and when a lever is pulled it is said to routine work. When a special movement was be reversed. As far as possible the layout number- required, companies supplemented the fixed sig- ing is arranged so that, for the commonest train nals with oral or written instructions and hand movements, the levers are pulled in numerical signals. order. Modellers basing their layouts on prototype The normal practice is to number the levers in locations can, with a little research, find out the the same order that the equipment controlled ‘lies positions and types of signal used including on the ground’. In Figure 2-1, down line trains changes that may have occurred over the years. approach from the left, hence the down line signals Where the layout is a ‘might have been’ the follow- occupy the low numbers. Similarly the up line sig- ing notes can give initial guidance to correct signal nals occupy the high numbers. The crossovers and location. However, for the layout to be fully their associated ground signals are located in the authentic it is necessary to study the practices of middle of the frame and provide a physical separa- the company being portrayed. Luckily, there is a tion between the two sets of running signal levers. considerable amount of information available in In addition to their numbers, levers are also railway literature and from specialist societies, identified by their colours which indicate the par- particularly the Signalling Record Society. ticular function that they perform. The standard colours are:- Distant signals Yellow 2.1.1 Signal box interior layout Stop signals Red When a lever frame is fixed in a box there are two Points Black positions that it can occupy: Point locks Blue • With the signalman facing the running lines so Detonator Placers Black with White chevrons that he can see the points and signals while Spares White operating the levers. This has a disadvantage in that the signal levers, track diagram, block instruments, etc. tend to obstruct his view. In 2.1.3 Facing point locks and fouling bars addition, he only has access to the windows at either end of the frame for giving instructions Facing points on running lines carrying passenger to drivers or shunters. traffic are required to be fitted with facing point locks. The lock mechanism consists of a bar fitted • With the signalman having his back to the run- between the point blades that has either one or ning lines so that by turning round he has an two holes in it. Where passenger traffic used only uninterrupted view and access to all windows one of the facing roads and only non-passenger overlooking the line. traffic used the other road, it was the practice to There are no hard and fast rules but the latter provide a one-hole lock bar. However, it has now method was more often adopted when planning become general practice to provide a two-hole lock new frames in early BR days. Where signal boxes bar locking facing points both normal and reverse, are shown on track diagrams their orientation is regardless of traffic considerations. A sliding bolt, indicated by representing the frame by a thick line connected to a locking lever in the signal box, fits and the signalman by a dot. In Figure 2-1 the into the holes locking the points. In modern prac- Compiled by A. Garraway, J. R. Hadwin, D. Strivens, M. H. Walshaw. 6 - 2 - 1 Drawings devised by K. Sheale Artwork by Kensington Graphics tice when a facing point lock lever is normal in the provides an indication in addition to, or in place of, frame, the points are unbolted and free to be track circuiting. moved. When the lever is reversed the bolt is inserted and the points are locked. To reverse a set of facing points, the signalman 2.2 Typical Through Station first restores the locking lever to normal to unbolt Layouts the points. He then reverses the points and revers- es the locking lever. This inserts the bolt into the 2.2.1 Semaphore signalling at a through second hole in the stretcher bar locking the point station in the reversed position. To prevent points being moved under a train, Figure 2-1 shows the mechanical signalling that mechanically worked points are fitted with a foul- might be planned for a through station with two ing bar. This consists of a bar longer than the main crossovers and a siding connection. The sig- longest vehicle wheelbase (usually some 16m, or nals have been numbered and their functions 50ft, in length) which lies alongside the inside could be described as follows: edge of one of the running rails and is connected to 1. Down distant the facing point lock mechanism. Unbolting a fac- 2. Down home ing point lock causes the fouling bar to rise into 3. Down starting the flangeway. Should a train be passing, the foul- 4. Down advanced starting ing bar would be prevented from rising and, in 5. Call on to down platform turn, prevent the bolt from being withdrawn and 6. Shunt ahead down line the points moved. In modern practice, particularly 7. Shunt, up line to down platform with the advent of long modern coaching stock, the 8. Crossover, up line to down platform fouling bar has been replaced by electrical locking 9. Shunt, down platform to up line using the track circuits. 10. Shunt, up platform to down line 11. Crossover, up platform to down line 12. Shunt, down line to up platform 2.1.4 Electric depression bar 13. Shunt, down sidings to down line 14. Crossover, down sidings exit This device consists of a bar which lies in the 15. Shunt, down line to down sidings flangeway level with the running rails. It is fitted 16. Call on to up platform with electrical contacts which are activated when 17. Up advanced starting the bar is depressed by the weight of a locomotive 18. Up starting or other vehicle. It is found at the end of bay plat- 19. Up home forms and is used to remind the signalman of the 20. Up distant presence of a locomotive or vehicle standing there. It is often provided where, due to deposits on the Note 1: The shunt ahead signal (6) only needs to rails, the track circuiting is erratic in operation. It be provided if the distance between the siding points and the advanced starter (4) 13 Yellow Headshunt 14 1 5 2 3 6 4 Platform 14 Down 8 11 7 10 9 12 15 Up 8 11 Platform 17 18 19 16 20 Signal Box FIGURE 2-1 Typical Through Station with Semaphore Signalling. 6 - 2 - 2 Part 6 Section 2 LAYOUT OF SIGNALS Issued May 1995 is less than the normal length of train tant signal as a separate entity has virtually dis- that uses the siding. appeared. (Section 1.7 covers these changes). Note 2: If a train standing on the down line in the The introduction of three and four aspect sig- rear of advanced starter (4) was regularly nalling using automatic block working would often required to back into the down platform require the new signals to be located in different as far as ground signal (9), a third ground positions to the semaphores that they replaced. signal, in addition to (12) and (15), would These changes occurred where the new block sec- be needed to cover this movement. tions differed in length and/or to improve signal However, some railways, notably the SR sighting for the drivers benefit. In addition, many and the MR (prior to 1906), used a single of the subsidiary signals have been eliminated, for ground signal to cover all three routes on example in some areas the main signal is used to the principle that the driver knew where control Shunt Ahead movements. he wished to go and could see the lie of A variation that has been used for the Shunt the points. Again, company practice needs Ahead and Calling On signals is shown in the to be checked. drawing. In place of the single yellow or the two diagonal white lights described in Section 1.9, Note 3: Although not shown in the figure, a two some areas make use of a modified standard colour aspect green /yellow colour light distant light ground signal bracketed out from the post was sometimes used (from the 30’s to below the main signal. The normal aspect is with date) to replace a semaphore distant all lamps out.
Recommended publications
  • INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE of DIMENSIONS 1676Mm Gauge (BG)
    INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS 1676mm Gauge (BG) REVISED, 2004 SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676mm, GAUGE SHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676MM GAUGE Schedule of Dimensions for Indian Railways, 1676mm Gauge Dear Sir/Dear Sirs, With their circular letter No. 735-W. of 1922, the Railway Board issued a Schedule of Maximum, Minimum and Recommended Dimensions to be observed on all 1676mm gauge Railways in India. In that Schedule, certain dimensions of the previous schedule of the year 1913 were modified with the object of permitting the use of enlarged rolling stock. 2. The Schedule of Dimensions of 1922 contained two distinct sections, namely, a schedule of "Maximum and Minimum Dimensions" which was considered to enable the proposed larger vehicles to run with about the same degree of safety as that which was previously obtained on the older Railways with existing stock, and a schedule of "Recommended Dimensions" intended to provide approximately the same clearances from fixed structures for the future larger vehicles as the 1913 schedule gave for existing vehicles. 3. In their circular letter No. 232-Tech.dated the 8th February, 1926, the Railway Board gave instructions that the Recommended Dimensions given in the 1922 Schedule were to be observed on important Railways in all new works and alterations to existing works. These orders were modified in letter No. 232-Tech. of the 26th April, 1926, which allowed a relaxation in the case of certain recommended dimensions, the adoption of which would involve heavy expenditure in remodeling works. 4. In 1929, it was found desirable further to amend the Schedule of 1922 in order to introduce certain improve- ments in the light of experience gained since it was issued, and to provide the clearances required by electric traction equipment on lines which were likely to be electrified in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis
    USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report NURail Project ID: NURail2013-UIUC-R08 Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis By M. Rapik Saat Research Assistant Professor – Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] and Chen-Yu Lin Masters Student of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] 1 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 2 USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis Introduction Safety is a high priority for any rail system. There are several safety concerns associated with operating passenger and freight trains on shared-use rail corridors (SRC). Adjacent track accident (ATA) is one of the most important concerns. ATA mainly refers to a train accident scenario where a derailed equipment intrudes adjacent tracks, causing operation disturbance and potential subsequent train collisions on the adjacent tracks. Other ATA scenarios include collisions between trains on adjacent tracks (raking), turnouts and railroad crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • Paterson Points NEWSLETTER of the RAIL MOTOR SOCIETY INCORPORATED
    Paterson Points NEWSLETTER OF THE RAIL MOTOR SOCIETY INCORPORATED FEBRUARY 2014 Patron ~ Rear Admiral Peter Sinclair AC Inside... ~ Society News ~ Tour Reports ~ Operations Diary ~ AGM Saturday 22 March Clear of the main line, the CPHs stabled for the night adjacent to Gilgandra’s loading bank. Photo: James Brook PRINT POST APPROVED PP100003904 Society News Operations Report Annual General Meeting ~ Bruce Agland, Operations Manager Members are advised that this important meeting will be held on Saturday 22nd March commencing at 1000hrs, the Operations for 2014 formal meeting notice and associated forms are included 4 January Dungog (CPH), Archer with this newsletter. 14-15 January Junee (402), ARTC Election of Five Board Members 19 January Nowra (620), ARHS In accordance with the new Constitution, five of those 25 January Tamworth (620), Maitland Rotary members of the Board elected at the AGM in 2013 will 15-16 February Metro Freight Lines (620), retire but will be eligible for re-election should they decide Epping Model Railway Club to nominate again. 8 March Metro (620), Private Charter 4-6 April Orange (620), Travelscene Membership Renewals 12-13 April Steamfest, (TBC), The Rail Motor Society Members are advised that your membership subscription for 14-15 April Binnaway (402), ARHS Queensland 2014 that was due on 1st January is now OVERDUE. 3 May Denman (620), Kalverla Unfinancial members are not eligible to vote at the Annual 3 May Denman (CPH), Ede General Meeting and proxy forms will not be validated if you 17-18 May Gulgong (CPH), Scott are unfinancial before the start of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • (RIHSAC) Presentation
    Welcome to RIHSAC 94 Dilip Sinha, Secretary, RIHSAC 15 October 2013 1 Who’s minding the gap? John Cartledge Safety Policy Adviser Presentation to RIHSAC 15 October 2013 Why does platform edge risk matter to passengers? “At Clapham Junction the height gap between the platform and the trains on platform 15 is a health and safety issue. Towards the eastern end of the platform I have seen elderly people unable to disembark because the gap was unmanageable.” Joanna Moorhead Thursday 22 December 2011 Yes, I do mind the gap – you don't have to be drunk to fall under a train As public information campaigns go, this one seemed a cracker. Travelling while you're drunk is dangerous; and to make the point in the runup to Christmas, British Transport police have released CCTV images of a drunken passenger on a train as she staggers off it. Thankfully, the woman in the film is fine, because someone saw her fall and the train was delayed while she was hauled from under it. But seeing those images makes me furious, because despite what Network Rail might like us to believe, you don't have to be drunk to fall under a train. According to the staff at my local station, Clapham Junction in south-west London, it happens to entirely sober passengers on a regular basis, because of ever-bigger gaps between platforms and trains. I know this is true, because over the last three years my daughters, who travel to secondary school through Clapham Junction, have twice told me about incidents in which friends of theirs fell on to the tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dccconcepts “Modelling Advice” Publication
    A DCCconcepts “Modelling advice” publication DCC Advice #11 Page 1 Wiring Point-work & Special track conditions for DC or DCC Wiring the track… In plain English, with diagrams! If we had a $ or £ or € for every time we’ve been asked how to wire track and point-work, we’d be writing this on a beach somewhere while sipping a cold beer! A great layout needs good trackwork, so first - a word about trackwork and getting good performance. Choose carefully! DO think about making your own turnouts if you have even moderate skills. It is not as hard as you think, needs only basic skills and tools... and we do our best to make it easy with our top quality gauges, trackwork frets and templates. PLUS we will soon provide a detailed “How to make track” tutorial too. Interested? Then call or email us and we will do our best to help you. No matter what scale you will model in, DO NOT even consider using insulated frogs! Yes, lazy retailers who do not understand what they sell - and modellers who have never done a proper job of laying track so it runs well may well recommend it to you… but do NOT be tempted. No matter which brand makes the turnouts, if you use insulated frogs, you WILL have small locos stalling or also suffer from wider wheels bridging the frog tip and creating momentary shorts that are hard to fix and really are a source of constant frustration. Use more realistic rail sizes please: Usually this will be code 55 in N, or Code 75 and 83 in OO or HO Scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix J Haddington Branch Line Survey
    Appendix J Haddington Branch Line Survey AllanRail East Lothian Access STAG Physical feasibility of re-opening the Haddington Rail Branch Line Background The reopening of the Haddington Railway branch line from the East Coast Main Line (ECML) at Longniddry to Haddington is one of the options that are required to be considered in the East Lothian Access STAG. This initial report informs the appraisal work of the feasibility of re-opening the railway, some of the issues and problems that would need to be resolved, choices that are available and suggests an order of magnitude cost. Because the rest of the railway is electrified it is assumed that the Haddington branch will also be equipped with standard 25Kv overhead electrification equipment. The report is based on a physical site walk-over on 21 February 2019, carried out by David Prescott of AllanRail who has considerable experience in the initial development of re-opened railways in Scotland including walk-overs on the Stirling – Alloa – Kincardine, Airdrie- Bathgate and Borders Railway routes in the inception and pre-construction stages. This is not an engineering assessment, but an initial view based on observation and experience. The route is considered in the Longniddry to Haddington direction and the report is broken down into key route sections. Connecting to the ECML The ideal connection to the main line has several desirable operating and engineering requirements: · It should be on the Edinburgh side of Longniddry to minimise the occupation of the ECML; · It should provide as
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Railway
    2.1.1 पूव रेलवे EASTERN RAILWAY 20192019----2020 के िलए पƗरसंपिēयĪ कƙ खरीद , िनमाϕण और बदलाव Assets-Acquisition, Construction and Replacement for 2019-20 (Figures in thousand of Rupees)(आंकड़े हजार Đ . मĞ) पूंजी पूंजी िनिध मूआिन िविन संिन रारेसंको जोड़ िववरण Particulars Capital CF DRF. DF SF RRSK TOTAL 11 (a ) New Lines (Construction) 70,70,00 .. .. .. .. .. 70,70,00 14 G Gauge Conversion 2,00,00 .. .. .. .. .. 2,00,00 15 ह Doubling 9,80,95 .. .. .. .. .. 9,80,95 16 - G Traffic Facilities-Yard 21,22,84 .. 90,25 13,22,19 .. 29,97,50 65,32,78 G ^ G Remodelling & Others 17 Computerisation 3,51,00 .. 12,41,30 62,00 .. .. 16,54,30 21 Rolling Stock 30,24,90 .. .. 7,66 .. 37,56,01 67,88,57 22 * 4 - Leased Assets - Payment of 518,12,69 205,67,31 .. .. .. .. 723,80,00 Capital Component 29 E G - Road Safety Works-Level .. .. .. .. .. 38,60,00 38,60,00 Crossings. 30 E G -/ Road Safety Works-Road .. .. .. .. .. 113,06,79 113,06,79 Over/Under Bridges. 31 Track Renewals .. .. .. .. .. 587,20,77 587,20,77 32 G Bridge Works .. .. .. .. .. 69,69,90 69,69,90 33 G Signalling and .. .. .. .. .. 83,25,97 83,25,97 Telecommunication 36 ^ G - G Other Electrical Works excl 1,34,17 .. 4,38,47 2,62,72 .. 5,08,29 13,43,65 K TRD 37 G G Traction Distribution Works 16,00,00 .. .. .. .. 110,59,55 126,59,55 41 U Machinery & Plant 5,16,94 .
    [Show full text]
  • Anesthesia CODE DESCRIPTION QTY 02-03-00001 N2 O +O2
    Anesthesia CODE DESCRIPTION QTY 02-03-00001 N2 O +O2 measuring apparatus 90 02-03-00002 ICU Ventilator 1,875 02-03-00003 Multi parameter monitor + capnograph 2,742 02-03-00004 Multi parameter monitor 1,674 02-03-00005 Anesthesia machine 933 02-03-00006 Ventilator 579 02-03-00007 Pediatric ventilator . 1,608 02-03-00008 Whirling hygrometer ,(5-50 C ) with measurement 129 ruler . 02-03-00009 Portable oxygen indicator 15 02-03-00010 Blood oximeter estimation unit with accessories and 15 spare parts 02-03-00011 Warmer humidifier for O2 outlet 300 02-03-00012 Anesthesia Ventilator 1,353 02-03-00013 Oxymeter (S-100 pulse oxymeter-ser, No. S0720 class 120 I type BF 02-03-00014 Cartridge for pressure monitoring :- a-mod. No. 7370 108 257 E2258 ser, No.011164 580 02-03-00015 b-mod. No. 7370 109 E2255 ser, No.1006412580 108 02-03-00016 Portable ventilators 1,101 02-03-00017 Pulse oximeter 1,500 02-03-00018 Respiratory humidifier 36 02-03-00019 Pressure recording machin 21 02-03-00020 Oxymeter 51 02-03-00021 Central oxygen flowmeter 200 02-03-00022 Puls Oxymeter : rechargable , portable , finger 100 sensor . 02-03-00023 Resuscitators (a-Good illumination , preferably 204 double light , b-Heater , preferably double light , c-Timer , d-O2 supply , e-Good support for the baby ,to prevent accident & falling down , f-Suitable for all pediatric age groups , g-Pressure transducer.) 02-03-00024 O2 Humedifier The head for fixing the bottle 200 containing the water is preferabley of special metalic material to prevent damage during fixing.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Portishead to Portbury Dock Junction Overview 17 9
    Ref: GS2/140569 Version: 1.00 Date: July 2014 Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 3 3. Business Objective 6 4. Business Case 9 5. Project Scope 11 6. Deliverables 12 7. Options Considered 13 8. Portishead to Portbury Dock Junction Overview 17 9. Engineering Options 19 10. Bathampton Turnback 52 11. Constructability and Access Strategy 53 12. Cost Estimates 56 13. Project Risks and Assumptions 57 14. High level business case appraisal against whole life costings 58 15. Project Schedule 59 16. Capacity/Route Runner Modelling 60 17. Interface with other Projects 61 18. Impact on Existing Customers, Operators and Maintenance Practice 62 19. Consents Strategy 63 20. Environmental Appraisal 64 21. Common Safety Method for Risk Evaluation Assessment (CSM) 65 22. Contracting Strategy 66 23. Concept Design Deliverables 67 24. Conclusion and Recommendations 68 References 70 Formal Acceptance of Selected Option by Client, Funders and Stakeholders 71 GRIP Stage 2 Governance for Railway Investment Projects Ref: GS2/140569 Version: 1.00 Date: July 2014 Appendices A Drawings B Cost Estimate C Qualitative Cost Risk Analysis D Capacity Modelling E Environmental Appraisal F Signalling Appraisal G Photograph Gallery H Track Bed Investigation (Factual, Interpretative and Hazardous Classification) I Visualisations (Galingaleway and Sheepway Gate Farm) J Interdisciplinary Design Certificate K Portishead Station Options Appraisal Report (produced by North Somerset Council) GRIP Stage 2 Governance for Railway Investment Projects Ref: GS2/140569 Version: 1.00 Date: July 2014 Issue Record Issue No Brief History Of Amendment Date of Issue 0.01 First Draft 30 May 2014 0.02 Second Draft updated to include comments 13 June 2014 1.00 Report Issued 18 July 2014 Distribution List Name Organisation Issue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Railway Station a Reminder of Incessant Government Under-Funding of the Nsw Rail System
    CAMDEN RAILWAY STATION A REMINDER OF INCESSANT GOVERNMENT UNDER-FUNDING OF THE NSW RAIL SYSTEM These notes relate only to the history of the passenger facilities at the Camden terminus. The history of the branch line has already been published. Alan Smith, a long-time member of the Australian Railway Historical Society and a frequent volunteer at its Resource Centre, won the competition to choose the cover photo for these notes. It seems strange that Alan chose a photograph not of the terminus but of an intermediate station, Kenny Hill. Why? Alan considered that this was the “iconic image of the challenges that existed in the day-to-day operation of the Camden line”. Specifically, the photograph shows the absence of priority given to passengers when the train crew had to decide whether to convey people or freight. It should be of no surprise that people lost out. Bob Merchant took this undated photograph on a day when the steam locomotive simply could not succeed in climbing the gradient. In the composition of the train were two milk pots. They were next to the engine. There was no question of reversing the train to Narellan, shunting and then proceeding with the only the passenger car. Why not? Because the milk pots had to be attached to No. 32 Express Goods or there would be serious trouble for the train crew if the Camden milk did not accompany the other milk vans from Bowral and Menangle on the train. What! Passengers are voters. Not so much in 1963 when the line closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Eprints.Whiterose.Ac.Uk/2271
    This is a repository copy of New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Monograph: Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A. and Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK. Working Paper 285 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds This is an ITS Working Paper produced and published by the University of Leeds. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. They represent only the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or approval of the sponsors. White Rose Repository URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Published paper Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A., Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. Working Paper 285 White Rose Consortium ePrints Repository [email protected] Working Paper 285 December 1989 NEW INTER-MODAL FREIGHT TECHNOLOGY AND COST COMPARISONS AS Fowkes CA Nash G Tweddle ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Locolines Ed 56
    DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE DIVISIONAL SECRETARY: Marc Marotta 0414 897 314 DIVISIONAL PRESIDENT: Terry Sheedy 0417 310 400 DIVISIONAL ASSIST. SECRETARY: Jim Chrysostomou 0404 814 141 DIVISIONAL VICE PRESIDENT: John Marotta 0414 864 702 DIVISIONAL DELEGATES Metropolitan Sub-division: Kevin Duggan 0404 811 589 Paris Jolly 0422 790 624 Pacific National Sub-division: Peter Laux 0417 526 544 Pacific National (ex Freight) Sub-division: James Styles 0427 018 963 Passenger Sub-division: Wayne Hicks 0407 035 282 MARCH 2013 LOCO LINES Conten ts LLOCOOCO LLINESINES EDITION 56 Marc Marotta—Loco Div Secretary 3 MAR 2013 Terry Sheedy—Branch / Div President 6 Loco Lines is published by the Locomotive Division of the Australian Rail, Tram & Bus John Marotta— Divisional V/P 7 Industry Union – Victorian Branch. See the bottom of this page for the Locomotive Division’s business address, V/ Line Pass OHS Report 12 telephone, e-mail and website details. Nelsons Column 14 Loco Lines is distributed free to all financial members of the Locomotive Division. Retired Enginemen also receive the Letters 20 magazine for free. It is made available to non-members at a cost of $20.00 per year. Cab Committee 22 Advertisements offering a specific benefit to Locomotive Signal Sighting Committee 23 Division members are published free of charge. Heritage groups are generally not charged for advertising or tour information. Off the Rails 25 Views or opinions expressed in published contributions to Loco Scholarships 25 Lines are not necessarily those of the Union Office. We also reserve the right to alter or delete text for legal or other Talkback from Hinch 26 purposes.
    [Show full text]