DOCSLIB.ORG

An Assessment of the Adequacy of U.S-Canadian Infrastructure To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PB95-112249 t 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act Section 6015 Study: Assessment of Border Crossings and Transportation Corridors for North American Trade (Northeast) An Assessment of the Adequacy of U.S-Canadian Infrastructure to Accommodate the Trade through Eastern Border Crossings Appendix: Descriptive Profiles of Niagara Frontier REPRODUCED BY: N11S. u.s. Department of Commerce---­ National Technicallnfonnation Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 NOTICE The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. The United States Government does not endorse the products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers' names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the objective of this document. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a starndard. sDecification or r~0'111 ~H nn REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form A'I!J&ved OM8 No. 7fJ4.0188 ~ublif re~ortin~ bu~den fOE.this colle~t;on of infor~atiOn ;s est;mat~d to aveda~.l hou~ ~eEhreaR~nse. ;n~lUdi~9 the lme ~~ eVl wng.lnstrUt 10ns lse~~c ln~ ex stln~. a a Sources. a erlng an lntalnlg e ~·neede. an com 1 1 9 na re ew1n h co ec 10n 0 .1n or:ma 10n. nd c nts re r 1 lS bur n stlllla or an ot r 1 ~~~~~~~~~?b~~~~t~.Yl~~t~ l~e F~a '" f~~f1fr ~p!orb~~grata lOn lsr·err~ tlO~1!~?1SDP~~~~~~g5~fdrs.on12 g:~~~~~c~n~J \~~ 'D~~Xl~+b~~s ~~f~~~~.~n,'~a~~~hle£~B~n . ArHe~~~~~~~~~K~1 0 2. REPORT DATE 3\ REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED 1111111111111111111111111111111 February 1994 Final Report PB95-1l2249 August 1992-January 1994 I- 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NlHlERS An Assessment of the Adequacy of the U.S. ~anadian Infrastructure to Accommodate Trade through Eastern Border HW476/H4027 Crossings: . Appendix 4 Descriptive Profiles of Niaqara Frontier 6. AUTHORCS) Dr. John C. Taylor, Mike Garver, Amy C. Flanagan 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAMECS) AND ADDRESSCES) B. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION U.S. Department of Transportation REPORT NLt1BER Research and Special Programs Administration John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center DOT/VNTSC-FHWA-94-3.D Cambridge, MA 02142 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAMECS) AND ADDRESSCES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING U.S. Department of Transportation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Federal Highway Administration 400 7th Street, S.W. FHWA-PL-94-009-07 Washington, DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 13. ABSTRACT CMaximum 200 words) The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 calls for a study of U.S. international border crossings. The objective of the study is to identify existing and emerging trade corridors and transportation subsystems that facilitate trade between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. This appendix contains a series of border crossing profiles covering the major crossings and in some cases minor crossings in the border frontier. The frontier itself is a definition created for the 6015 Study to aid in the analysis of trade and traffic flows. The crossings included in this discussion include all commercial ports in the frontier, all ports identified as having infrastructure needs, and most of the smaller ports if traffic volumes warranted. These latter predominantly serve local needs. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) , Port of Entry, Border Crossings Inspection Facilities 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified N~N /:>4U-Ul-Z/jU-~~uu 9§?~6~gedob~ ~gI\~i~: 23g~i8 •• J • APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS Symbol When You Know Multiply By To Find Symbol Symbol When You Know MUltiply By To Find Symbol LENGTH LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm mm millimeters 0.039 inches in It feet 0.305 meters m m meters 3.28 feet It yd yards 0.914 meters m m meters 1.09 yards yd mi miles 1.61 kilometers km km kilometers 0.621 miles mi AREA AREA Z z z in square inches 645.2 square millimeters mrnZ mm square millimeters 0.0016 square inches in Z ftZ square feet 0.093 square meters mZ m square meters 10.764 square feet ftZ Z ycfl square yards 0.836 square meters mZ m square meters 1.195 square yards ycfl ac acres 0.405 hectares ha ha hectares 2.47 acres ac mil square miles 2.59 square kilometers kmz km2 square kilometers 0.386 square miles mi2 VOLUME VOLUME f10z fluidounces 29.57 milliliters mL mL milliliters 0.034 fluidounces f10z gal gallons 3.785 liters L L liters 0.264 gallons gal ftZ cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 m3 cubic meters 35.71 cubic feet ftZ yeP cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 m3 cubic meters 1.307 . cubic yards yeP NOTE: Volumes greater than 1000 I shall be shown in m3• MASS MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g g grams 0.035 ounces oz Ib pounds 0.454 kilograms kg kg kilograms 2.202 pounds Ib T short tons (2000 Ib) 0.907 megagrams Mg Mg megagrams 1.103 short tons (2000 Ib) T (or "metric ton") (or or) (or "to) (or "metric ton") TEMPERATURE (exact) TEMPERATURE (exact) of Fahrenheit 5(F-32)19 Celcius °C °C Celcius 1.8C +32 Fahrenheit of temperature or (F-32)11.8 temperature temperature temperature ILLUMINATION ILLUMINATION Ie foot-candles 10.76 lux Ix Ix lux 0.0929 foot-candles fc fI foot-Lamberts 3.426 candelalm 2 cdlm 2 cdlmz candelalm 2 0.2919 foot-Lamberts fI FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS Ibf poundforce 4.45 newtons N N newtons 0.225 poundforce Ibf Ibfli"z poundforce per 6.89 kilopascals kPa kPa kilopascals 0.145 poundforce per Ibflin2 square inch square inch III I • SI is the symbol for the Intemational System of Units. Appropriate (Revised September 1993) rounding should be made to comply with Section 4 of ASTM E380. An Assessment ofthe Adequacy ofU.S-Canadian Infrastructure to Accommodate the Trade through Eastern Border Crossings Appendix: Descriptive Profiles ofNiagara Frontier Sponsored by the Office ofPolicy Development Federal Highway Administration August 1994 • PREFACE Congress, under Section 6015 of the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), mandated an international border crossing study regarding trade and transportation between the. United States, Canada, and Mexico. Specifically, the study's objectives were to identify existing and emerging trade corridors and' transportation subsystems that have been facilitating trade between the three countries. This study was conducted by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the U.S. Department of Transportation. In the conduct of the Section 6015 study, available data were collected from Canadian, U.S. and Mexican public and private sources. The study team undertook an extensive outreach effort to bring local and state interests into the process. Shippers and carriers participated in meetings across the country to identify issues and to provide recommendations and suggested solutions. Meetings were held in Canada and Mexico to gain a more comprehensive understanding and perspective on border related concerns. For practical purposes, the study was divided into several regional activities. This was to reflect separately some of the concerns and problems presumed to be unique to those regions. The John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center) was tasked to perform the assessment of the adequacy of the border infrastructure, both physically and operationally, and its ability to accommodate current and future trade and transportation needs throughout the northeastern U.S. region, from Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan to Calais, Maine. This document is one of five containing infrastructure inventories of facilities along the eastern U.S.-Canadian border. This work, conducted by the Volpe Center and Wayne State University, draws upon previous studies and data collection efforts. These sources were augmented by data from border crossing authorities, facility operators, and the federal inspection services, and from on-site visits to border crossing facilities. The effort of this study, is a first step in the development of a more comprehensive understanding of trade and traffic flows in North America. TABLE OF CONTENTS PORT OF BUFFALO PEACE BRIDGE 1 PORT OF NIAGARA FALLS LEWISTON-QUEENSTON BRIDGE ............................ .. 15 RAINBOW BRIDGE ...................................... .. 28 WHIRLPOOL RAPIDS BRIDGE 40 NIAGARA FRONTIER RAILROAD BRIDGES 53 ii INTRODUCTION This appendix contains a series of border crossing profiles covering the major crossings in the border frontier. The frontier itself is a definition created for the 6015 Study to aid in tbe analysis of trade and traffic flows. The crossings included in this discussion are commercial ports. Where infrastructure needs have been identified, they are cited in the discussion. Information for these profiles was collected from available reports and summary statistics; responses t~ data requests from the General Services Administration (GSA), U.S. and Canadian Customs Services, Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS), Bridge and Tunnel Authorities and Operators, and State Transportation Departments. Discussions and on-site visits were conducted with these agencies for most of the border crossings. The profiles provide information on ownership and operation, traffic arid activity levels, physical infrastructure and associated problems, and staffing levels.
Recommended publications
  • Culturegrams States Edition

    Culturegrams States Edition

    Print window Close window The Empire State Established 1788 11th State n The first public miniature golf course was built on the roof of a New York City skyscraper in 1926. n The apple muffin is the official state muffin. n The Empire State Building has 73 elevators. One can take you from the lobby to the 80th floor in 45 seconds. n A Clayton housewife named Sophia LaLonde invented Thousand Island dressing; it is named after the Thousand Islands. n Baseball began in New York. The first baseball game was played in Hoboken on 19 June 1845. n “Uncle Sam” was a meatpacker from Troy. During the War of 1812, Sam Wilson stamped “U.S. Beef” on his products. Soldiers came to think of him as Uncle Sam. n In 1857, Joseph C. Gayetty of New York invented toilet paper. It had his name on every sheet. n Almost one and a half million stray dogs and cats live in the New York City area. n New Yorker Franklin Roosevelt was the only U.S. president to be elected four times. Climate Sunny skies in the Empire State generally are hidden by clouds that form over the Great Lakes. The coast isn't as cloudy or as cold as the rest of the state. Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse get more snow than any other U.S. cities. The Tug Hill Plateau area got over 29 feet (9 m) in one long winter! It rains regularly in the summer. New York is almost always humid, which makes the temperatures seem more extreme.
  • Print Directions (.Pdf)

    Print Directions (.Pdf)

    Coming from Sault Ste. Marie Take Hwy 17 (Trans Canada Highway) through Sudbury to North Bay. Turn North on Highway 11 and follow to New Liskard. Take highway 65 west to the village of Elk Lake. Turn left on Highway 560 west to Gowganda. Just past Gowganda turn left on Auld Reekie Camp Road. Coming from Southern Ontario (Niagara Falls area) Take the QEW (Queen Elizabeth Way) north. The QEW turns east after you go over the big bridge near Hamilton and heads towards Toronto. Drive to Oakville and right by the massive Ford auto plant (1 mile past Trafalgar Road) take the cut-off for Highway 403. Take Highway 403 to highway 401. Go East on the 401 until you reach the cut-off for highway 400 north. Follow the 400 north all the way to the city of Barrie. Just past the city of Barrie the 400 ends. It splits into highway 68 and highway 11. Take highway 11 to North Bay. Follow highway 11 through North Bay to New Liskard. Take highway 65 west to the village of Elk Lake. Turn left on Highway 560 west to Gowganda. Just past Gowganda turn left on Auld Reekie Camp Road. Coming from Ottawa or Montreal If coming from Montreal take Highway 40 across into Ontario and highway 40 to Ottawa becomes highway 417 to Ottawa. Follow 417 past Ottawa and past Kanata. About 4 miles past Kanata 417 takes a sharp turn north and turns into Highway 17 about 40 mile later. Follow highway 17 all the way to highway 11, which is just south of North Bay.
  • The Niagara Area Is a Superb Destination for a Short and Easy

    The Niagara Area Is a Superb Destination for a Short and Easy

    he Niagara area isia asuperb gaOnce in thre Niagara rea gion, cycling is an obvious T destination for a short and easy activity choice for all abilities as trails are flat and cycling holiday with the option to add on a wide many are dedicated to non vehicular traffic only. N In addition you might want to consider: range of diverse activities. e region is only 1 ½ hours driving time from Toronto and 45 minutes • a jet boat ride on the Niagara River from Buffalo, New York. ere are four bridge crossings from the United States into the area to • a wet outing on the Maid of the Mist boat make it particularly reachable by car for the up close to the Niagara Falls themselves American tourist. ere are now two types of train service offered from Toronto to the Niagara Falls • visiting and tasting at one of the seventy or area on summer weekends so people without a car so wineries that lie between Grimsby and have easy access. If you fly into Hamilton, Toronto Niagara-on-the-Lake or Buffalo you can avail yourself of one of the • spa visits countless shuttle or taxi options. • a play at the world class Shaw Festival eatre • strolling through Niagara-on-the-Lake, one of Canada’s prettiest towns • excellent shopping and dining e Niagara area is best visited in late spring, summer and early fall. e weather tends to be hot and humid in the summer with rain possi - ble at anytime though rarely does it last for more than a few days.
  • 4 Removal of Niagara Scenic Parkway

    4 Removal of Niagara Scenic Parkway

    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Telephone: (716) 286-4310 June 26, 2018 The Niagara Falls City Council Niagara Falls, New York RE: Removal of the Niagara Scenic Parkway —from Main Street to Findlay Drive Council Members: An agreement has been reached between the Power Authority of the State of New York ("NYPA"), the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation ("State Parks"), the New York State Department of Transportation ("NYSDOT"), the USA Niagara Development Corporation ("USAN"), and the City of Niagara Falls (the "City"), which is the next step in the ROBERT MOSES PARKWAY NORTH SEGMENT REMOVAL PROJECT (Project). This construction project is estimated to cost $38,500,000. It is largely funded through NYPA ($36,500,000), with the balance being paid for by New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation ($2,000,000). No municipal capital funds are required for this Agreement to take effect. Since constructed in 1962, the former Robert Moses Parkway has not just been the subject of severe criticism but a malignancy that has decimated our community by having cut off both residents and visitors from the Niagara River, Niagara River Gorge, and the public lands connected thereto. The Parkway, rather than being the transportation link in service of economic development and city-building, instead only served to create an effective by-pass around the City and its Main Street, Pine Avenue, and other traditional business corridors. This Project, more than any before marks the largest removal, reconfiguration and regeneration of urban land since a portion of the Parkway passing through Niagara Falls State Park and Prospect Park was removed in the late 1970s.
  • Table 9-1 Road Allowance Widths

    Table 9-1 Road Allowance Widths

    Table 9-1 Road Allowance Widths Town of Fort Erie Regional Road Number Road Name Segment Width in Metres Gorham Road – Lakeshore 1 Dominion Road 20.1 Road Rosehill Road – Central 3 Garrison Road 30.5 Avenue QEW – Thompson Road 30.5 Thompson Road – 26.2 19 Gilmore Road Concession Road Concession Road – Niagara 23.2 Boulevard Stevensville Road – Bowen Road 26.2 Thompson Road 21 Thompson Road – Niagara Phipps Street 20.1 Parkway Montrose Road – QEW 30.5 25 Netherby Road QEW – Niagara Parkway 26.2 Stevensville Road Carver Street – CP Railway 20.1 116 Stevensville Road / Sodom C.P. Railway – North Limit of 26.1 Road Fort Erie Helena Street / Thompson Dominion Road – Phipps 122 26.2 Road Street Lakeshore Road – Niagara 124 Central Avenue 26.2 Parkway Table 9-1 Road Allowance Widths Town of Grimsby Regional Road Number Road Name Segment Width in Metres 10 Casablanca Boulevard Main Street West – QEW 26.2 Mud Street – Ridge Road Mountain Road 26.2 East Ridge Road East – Main 12 Mountain Road 20.1 Street West Christie Street Main Street West - QEW 26.2 Christie Street QEW – Olive Street 30.5 East of Park Road South – Park Road / Bartlett Avenue 39.6 Main Street East 14 Main Street East – Central Bartlett Avenue 35.4 Avenue West Limit of Grimsby – 39 QEW North Service Road 26.2 Olive Street West Limit of Grimsby – 40 QEW South Service Road 26.2 East Limit of Grimsby West Limit of Grimsby – 73 Mud Street West and East 26.2 East Limit of Grimsby West Limit of Grimsby – 26.2 Casablanca Boulevard Casablanca Boulevard – 81 Main Street West 20.1 Robinson
  • Official Road Map of Ontario

    Official Road Map of Ontario

    5 Kilometres 0 Miles 5 5 kilomètres 0 milles 5 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2016 © Imprimeur de la Reine pour l’Ontario, 2016 18 FORT mn Niagara-On-The-Lake GEORGE D LAKE ONTARIO E R 87 OR SH hg (LAC ONTARIO) KE 93 LA hg55 Youngstown mn EAST & WEST LINE 2 87 1 18F Virgil hg D po ST F R NE RD NE ST. CATHARINES RD Y OUR RD E W LI N K W P A 3 RD E LINE R RT F N O 48 TOW o M N SH u IA W O KE I ION r L hg R T LA G S EL E SI LA S E S N A I L 83 86 V KE E AN I MA LINE 5 RD R C CES hg R C ST Dhg A ST N R 18 42 T M A O ON EE R C SCOT i C RD l mn A 51 38 hg AIRPORT RD C e LTON ST R 47 K 46 G CAR A IV O hg N A QEW I OO A M O N 44 L E A N E BROCK'S MONUMENT 104 R T AV S 55 Lewiston 49 48 C R dc T A O r po e RD I 12 7 RD CONC. N R hg O RD I D e O D N O 3RD AVE A LLA k S E Q L UE P E T W E NS KW Queenston 11 TO N ST Queenston-Lewiston Y St.
  • Rethinking the Niagara Frontier

    Rethinking the Niagara Frontier

    Ongoing work in the Niagara Region Next Steps Heritage Development in Western New York The November Roundtable concluded with a lively Rethinking the Niagara Frontier It would be a mistake, however, to say that the process of heritage development has discussion of the prospects for bi-national cooperation European Participants yet to begin here. around issues of natural and cultural tourism and her- itage development. There is no shortage of assets or Michael Schwarze-Rodrian As Bradshaw Hovey of UB’s smaller scale and at a finer grain. Projekt Ruhr GmbH Urban Design Project outlined, He highlighted the case of Fort stories, and there is great opportunity we can seize by Berliner Platz 6-8 A report on the November Roundtable there are initiatives in environ- Erie, one of the smaller commu- working together. Essen, Germany 45127 mental repair, historic preserva- nities in the region, but one that Email: schwarze-rodrian@projek- tion, infrastructure investment, rightfully lays claim to the title of Some identified the need to truhr.de economic development, and cul- “gateway to Canada.” broaden and deepen grassroots November 20, 2000 tural interpretation ongoing from What Fort Erie has done is rel- involvement, while others zeroed Christian Schützinger one end of the region to the atively simple. They have in on the necessity of engaging Bodensee-Alpenrhein Tourismus other. matched local assets with eco- leadership at higher levels of gov- Focus on heritage Bethlehem Steel Plant Postfach 16 In Buffalo, work is proceeding Source: Patricia Layman Bazelon nomic trends and community ernment and business. There was A-6901 Bregenz, Austria To develop the great bi-national region that spans the Niagara River, we should on the redevelopment of South goals to identify discrete areas of a great deal of discussion about Email: c.schuetzinger@bodensee- Buffalo “brownfields”; aggressive works; and a cultural tourism desired investment.
  • Underground Railroad in Western New York

    Underground Railroad in Western New York

    Underground Railroad on The Niagara Frontier: Selected Sources in the Grosvenor Room Key Grosvenor Room Buffalo and Erie County Public Library 1 Lafayette Square * = Oversized book Buffalo, New York 14203-1887 Buffalo = Buffalo Collection (716) 858-8900 Stacks = Closed Stacks, ask for retrieval www.buffalolib.org GRO = Grosvenor Collection Revised June 2020 MEDIA = Media Room Non-Fiction = General Collection Ref. = Reference book, cannot be borrowed 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 Books .............................................................................................................................. 2 Newspaper Articles ........................................................................................................ 4 Journal & Magazine Articles .......................................................................................... 5 Slavery Collection in the Rare Book Room ................................................................... 6 Vertical File ..................................................................................................................... 6 Videos ............................................................................................................................. 6 Websites ......................................................................................................................... 7 Further resources at BECPL .........................................................................................
  • Planning and Infrastructure Services Committee Item N1 for May 11, 2015

    Planning and Infrastructure Services Committee Item N1 for May 11, 2015

    Nll-l Ihe Region of Peel is theproud recipient of the National Quality Institute Order of IfRegion of Peel Excellence, Quality; theNational Quality Institute Canada Award of Excellence Gold Award, Wotting fe/i i/eu Healthy Workplace; anda 2008 IPAC/Dcloittc Public Sector Leadership ColdAward. R£CR»Y£D Ci.&'rlfOS f.ip.PT. APK I 0 2015 April 24, 2015 Resolution Number 2015-268 Mr. Peter Fay HEtf.KO.: RLE MC: City Clerk City of Brampton Planning and Infrastructure 2 Wellington Street West Services Committee Brampton, ON L6Y 4R2 Dear Mr. Fay: Subject: Ministry of Transportation Southern Highways Program 2014-2018 I am writing to advise that Regional Council approved the following resolution at its meeting held on Thursday, April 16, 2015: Resolution 2015-268 That the comments outlined in the report of the Commissioner of Public Works titled 'Ministry of Transportation Southern Highways Program 2014-2018* be endorsed; And further, that the Ministry of Transportation be requested to advance the planning, design and construction of highway improvements in and surrounding Peel Region listed in the "Planning for the Future Beyond 2018" section of the Southern Highways Program 2014-2018 to within the next five years, including Highways 401, 410, 427, Queen Elizabeth Way, Simcoe Area, GTA West Corridor and Niagara to GTA Corridor; And further, that the Ministry of Transportation be requested to plan for a further extension of Highway 427 to Highway 9; And further, that the Ministry of Transportation be requested to publish a long range sustainable transportation plan for Southern Ontario highways; And further, that a copy of the subject report be forwarded to the Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure, the Regions of York and Halton, the Cities of Brampton, Mississauga, Toronto and Vaughan, and the Town of Caledon, for information.
  • Congestion Charges Volume 1

    Congestion Charges Volume 1

    Congestion Charges Volume 1 THE PROBLEM OF URBAN CONGESTION IN CANADA The recent CAA study Grinding to a Halt: Evaluating Canada’s Worst Bottlenecks took a new perspective on a problem that Canadians know all too well: urban congestion is a growing strain on our economy and well-being. Canada’s worst traffic bottlenecks are almost as bad as bottlenecks in Chicago, Los Angeles and New York. Bottlenecks affect Canadians in every major urban area, increasing commute times by as much as 50%. This CAA briefing on investments in active transportation is one in a series that explore potential solutions to the problem of urban congestion in Canada. These briefings delve into solutions not only to highway congestion, but also to congestion on urban streets. Taken together the solutions explored in these briefings represent a toolkit to address this problem. The objective is to inform policy makers and the public about options to reduce congestion and key considerations for when and where a particular solution might be the right fit. Congestion charges are direct charges to road users and include traditional tolls, cordon charges and mobility charges (charges based on distance travelled). Congestion charges reduce congestion if they are set high enough to encourage drivers to take an alternate route, carpool, take transit, cycle, walk or forego their trips. Generally, the higher the charge, the greater the reduction in congestion. However, congestion charges can create some challenges: Congestion charges reduce congestion if they • They can be politically difficult to implement, because there can are set high enough to be winners and losers.
  • History, Facts & Statistics

    History, Facts & Statistics

    Other Facilities & Programs The Tourism Council supervises the preparation and placement of paid advertising to stimulate interest in the 1000 Islands Region as a tourist In 1977 the TIBA was gifted the Boldt Castle attraction destination. All advertising includes the toll free phone number (1-800-847- on Heart Island, a major tourist destination in the 5263) and website www.visit1000islands.com to receive direct inquiries. The 1000 Islands region, but a property that had been Travel Guide is sent as the fulfi llment piece to all inquiries received as a result allowed to decline to a state of disrepair. In addition, of these advertisements. the TIBA assumed ownership of the Boldt Castle Yacht House (now open for public visitation) as part of this gift. The TIITC is also very active in preparing news releases to stimulate editorial The TIBA quickly moved on a well-planned repair program to arrest further coverage in newspapers and magazines. Publicity programs, familiarization deterioration and to rehabilitate much of these properties. tours, and festival promotion off er a substantial amount of interest for this program. In 1978, the fi rst year the Authority operated the Boldt Castle attraction, THOUSANDBRIDGE ISLANDS attendance was tallied at 99,000 visitors. With over $35,000,000 in maintenance The TIBA and the FBCL, have long been key players in the promotion of tourism- repairs and major capital improvement projects to this regional attraction, related development, providing benefi ts of tremendous economic welfare to y this region. The TIBA’s Welcome Center houses the offi ces of the TIITC as well r visitations have increased annually – including a one-year, record-breaking a as off ers informational and comfort facilities to the traveling public, located s attendance of 240,000! r e near the US bridge at Collins Landing.
  • ECONOMIC IMPACT of VISITORS in NEW YORK 2019 Thousand Islands Focus

    ECONOMIC IMPACT of VISITORS in NEW YORK 2019 Thousand Islands Focus

    ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VISITORS IN NEW YORK 2019 Thousand Islands Focus WWW.TOURISMECONOMICS.COM INTRODUCTION The travel sector is an integral part of the New York To quantify the economic significance of the tourism sector economy. Visitors generate significant economic benefits to in New York, Tourism Economics has prepared a households, businesses, and government alike and represent comprehensive model detailing the far-reaching impacts a critical driver of New York’s future. Gross output (business arising from visitor spending. The results of this study show sales) attributable to visitor spending in New York totaled the scope of the travel sector in terms of direct visitor $118 billion in 2019. spending, as well as the total economic impacts, jobs, and fiscal (tax) impacts in the broader economy. By monitoring the visitor economy, policymakers can inform decisions regarding the funding and prioritization of the sector’s development. They can also carefully monitor its successes and future needs. This is particularly true for New York as it continues to expand upon its visitor economy, and by establishing a baseline of economic impacts, the industry can track its progress over time. 2 METHODOLOGY AND DATA SOURCES An IMPLAN input-output model was constructed for the The analysis draws on the following data sources: state of New York. The model traces the flow of visitor- related expenditures through the local economy and their • Longwoods International: survey data, including spending effects on employment, wages, and taxes. IMPLAN also profile characteristics for visitors to New York quantifies the indirect (supplier) and induced (income) • Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor impacts of tourism.