AR TI CLE Robustness AND TIMING OF CELLULAR DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH population-based SYMMETRY BREAKING Angel StanoeV1 | Christian Schröter1 | Aneta KOSESKA1∗ 1Department OF Systemic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute OF Molecular PhYSIOLOGY, Although COORDINATED BEHAVIOR OF MULTICELLULAR ORGANISMS Dortmund, GermanY RELIES ON INTERCELLULAR communication, THE DYNAMICAL mech- Correspondence ANISM THAT UNDERLIES SYMMETRY BREAKING IN HOMOGENEOUS Email: populations, THEREBY GIVING RISE TO HETEROGENEOUS CELL TYPES ∗
[email protected] REMAINS UNCLEAR. In CONTRAST TO THE PREVALENT cell-intrinsic VIEW OF DIFFERENTIATION WHERE MULTISTABILITY ON THE SINGLE CELL LEVEL IS A NECESSARY pre-requisite, WE PROPOSE THAT het- EROGENEOUS CELLULAR IDENTITIES EMERGE AND ARE MAINTAINED COOPERATIVELY ON A POPULATION LEVel. Identifying A GENERIC SYMMETRY BREAKING mechanism, WE DEMONSTRATE THAT ROBUST PROPORTIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENTIATED CELL TYPES ARE INTRINSIC FEATURES OF THIS INHOMOGENEOUS STEADY STATE solution. Crit- ICAL ORGANIZATION IN THE VICINITY OF THE SYMMETRY BREAKING BIFURCATION ON THE OTHER hand, SUGGESTS THAT TIMING OF cel- LULAR DIFFERENTIATION EMERGES FOR GROWING POPULATIONS IN A self-organized MANNER. Setting A CLEAR DISTINCTION BETWEEN pre-eXISTING ASYMMETRIES AND SYMMETRY BREAKING EVents, WE THUS DEMONSTRATE THAT EMERGENT SYMMETRY breaking, IN CONJUNCTION WITH ORGANIZATION NEAR CRITICALITY NECESSARILY LEADS TO ROBUSTNESS AND ACCURACY DURING DEVelopment. KEYWORDS SYMMETRY breaking; differentiation; INHOMOGENEOUS STEADY STATE Abbreviations: