Complete Dissertation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Complete Dissertation VU Research Portal Cholinergic modulation of microcircuits in the cortex Obermayer, J.M.G. 2019 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Obermayer, J. M. G. (2019). Cholinergic modulation of microcircuits in the cortex. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 Cholinergic modulation of microcircuits in the cortex Joshua Obermayer The research described in this thesis was conducted at the department of Integrative Neurophysiology of the Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. No part of this thesis may be reproduced without prior permission of the author. Front cover: shows two pyramidal neurons and an interneuron that together form a disynaptic inhibitory microcircuit in the human cortex. Tim Kroon reconstructed the neurons and Amber Kerkhofs made the cover design. VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT Cholinergic modulation of microcircuits In the cortex ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr. V. Subramaniam, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van de promotiecommissie van de Faculteit der Bètawetenschappen op woensdag 3 april 2019 om 11.45 uur in de aula van de universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 door Joshua Miro Gabriel Obermayer geboren te Rauenberg, Duitsland promotor: prof.dr. H.D. Mansvelder copromotor: dr. C.P.J. de Kock Table of contents Chapter 1 General introduction 7 Chapter 2 Prefrontal cortical ChAT-VIP interneurons 23 provide local excitation by cholinergic synaptic transmission and control attention Chapter 3 Layer-specific cholinergic control of human 47 and mouse cortical synaptic plasticity Chapter 4 Lateral inhibition by Martinotti interneurons 67 is facilitated by cholinergic inputs in human and mouse neocortex Chapter 5 General discussion 91 References 101 English summary 121 Nederlandse samenvatting 125 Acknowledgements 129 List of Publications 133 1 General introduction Elements of this text have been published in: Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2017 December, 8;11:100 Obermayer J*, Verhoog MB*, Luchicchi A, Mansvelder HD. *Equal contribution Chapter 1 1.1 Attention The ability of the neocortex to construct a coherent representation of the outside world enables us to adapt to changes in our environment and to reach our goals. To do this, our brain has to combine sensory inputs from the outside world with our internal memories, action plans and expectations (Buschman and Miller, 2010). However, this is not an easy task: the amount of sensory inputs received in the sensory areas of our cortex is overwhelming and even the remarkable processing capabilities of the cortex cannot process all of them simultaneously. To compensate for this limitation, our brain developed a mechanism called attention to select and highlight relevant items at the expense of irrelevant ones (Sarter et al., 2001). To be able to determine at any given time point what item to focus on, our mind needs to combine external inputs with intrinsic goals (Sarter et al., 2001). For that, there are two mechanisms that control attention. The so-called “bottom up” or stimulus-driven attention describes a phenomenon where an external stimulus is noticed and leads us to instantly focus on it, for example an unexpected loud tone. The second mechanism is called “top-down” attention and means that we direct our focus based on our internal deliberations mainly independent from external inputs (Buschman and Miller, 2010; Corbetta and Shulman, 2002). These mechanisms are not excluding each other, but act in an overlapping manner (Egeth and Yantis, 1997). This makes it, for example, possible to stay focused and continue with reading an important e-mail, even when the person next to you has a loud conversation on the phone. Most research on the mechanisms behind attentional performance is done in human beings using EEG or imaging methods. A specific focus in these studies is on the prefrontal structures of the cortex since people who experience a damage of these structures show a reduced capability of impulse control and attention performance (Duncan et al., 1996; Miller, 2000). The most known example is probably the case of Phineas Gage, an American railroad construction foreman who survived an accident in which an iron rod damaged his frontal lobe. Eventually, this resulted in a change of his personality, affecting mainly his impulsivity and capability to stay focused (Macmillan, 2000). It is shown that patients with a damaged frontal cortex indeed have a decreased capability to attain future goals (Bechara et al., 1994) and that they get easily distracted by irrelevant features which catch their attention and prevent them from staying focused (Duncan et al., 1996; Miller, 2000). The capability to stay focused on a specific task for a long period of time is crucial for reaching long term goals and is described as sustained attention (Kim et al., 2016; Miller and Buschman, 2013; Sarter et al., 2001). Since this requires the suppression of external non-relevant stimuli and focus on the relevant input based on internal deliberations it is suggested that a “top-down” control of attention is crucial for sustained attentional performance (Buschman and Kastner, 2015; Miller and Buschman, 2013; Sarter et al., 2001). Recent studies using functional imaging methods in human beings or invasive recordings techniques in rodents and non-human primates, linked neuronal processing in the frontal cortex with sustained attention performance (Buschman and Kastner, 2015; Kim et al., 2016). For example, behavioral studies in rodents using a well- validated task for sustained attention performance: the 3- or 5 choice serial reaction time task (3/5CSRTT) (Lustig et al., 2013; Robbins, 2002) has shown that both activity of inhibitory interneurons as well as excitatory pyramidal neurons in the mPFC are crucial for proper sustained attention performance (Kim et al., 2016; Luchicchi et al., 2016). Taken together, sustained attentional performance is one of the key features to be capable to focus on the relevant information that our cortex receives. The processing of information occurs in neuronal networks in our brain. How attentional performance affect these networks will be further described in the following paragraph. 8 General introduction 1.2 The effect of attention demanding behavior on neuronal activity Neuronal networks are thought to represent behavioral states or sensory inputs through their specific firing activity. Indeed, it has been shown that a higher demand of attention 1 performance by adding distracters or decreasing the conspicuity of cues during a task led to an increased neuronal activity in the mPFC (Gill et al., 2000). This change of firing activity is thought to be caused by different populations of neurons that are in competition and either represent or do not represent the attended features, objects or locations (Reynolds et al., 1999; Thiele and Bellgrove, 2018). Recent studies indicate that population of neurons that represent attended objects, locations or features in general, increase their firing activity (Krauzlis et al., 2013; Noudoost et al., 2010; Thiele and Bellgrove, 2018). In contrast, neurons that represent irrelevant features had a reduced spiking activity (Martinez-Trujillo and Treue, 2004). How these neuronal networks exactly encode attention performance and affect behavior is not unraveled yet, but computational models give an insight by describing the effect of attention on neuronal input output relationships (Ni and Maunsell, 2017; Ni et al., 2012; Sanayei et al., 2015). The effect of attention on these relationships are described by a “gain change” (Ni et al., 2012; Sanayei et al., 2015). In the “normalization model of attention” it is assumed that attention affects the gain of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (Ni and Maunsell, 2017; Ni et al., 2012; Sanayei et al., 2015). In that way the increased activity of excitatory neurons is normalized by the higher excitation of inhibitory neurons (Ni and Maunsell, 2017; Ni et al., 2012). Recent in vivo studies in macaque monkeys and rodents indicated indeed that both the activity of excitatory as well as inhibitory neurons in the frontal cortex is increased while the animal performs an attention demanding behavior (Kim et al., 2016; Thiele et al., 2016). These findings indicate the importance of both excitatory as well as inhibitory neuron activity during attention demanding behavior to maintain the excitation inhibition balance. On a network level, attention demanding behavior correlates with
Recommended publications
  • Cortical Bitufted, Horizontal, and Martinotti Cells Preferentially
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 3217–3222, March 1999 Neurobiology Cortical bitufted, horizontal, and Martinotti cells preferentially express and secrete reelin into perineuronal nets, nonsynaptically modulating gene expression (GABAergic interneuronsyCa21-binding proteinsyneuropeptidesychandelier cellsybasket cells) CHRISTINE PESOLD*†,WEN SHENG LIU*, ALESSANDRO GUIDOTTI*, ERMINIO COSTA*, AND HECTOR J. CARUNCHO*‡ *Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1601 West Taylor Street, MyC 912, Chicago IL, 60612; and ‡Department of Fundamental Biology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain 15706 Contributed by Erminio Costa, December 28, 1998 ABSTRACT Reelin (Reln) is a protein with some struc- mouse, shows a normal Reln expression in Cajal–Retzius cells tural analogies with other extracellular matrix proteins that and secretion in the extracellular matrix in embryonic devel- functions in the regulation of neuronal migration during the opment but neuroanatomical abnormalities reminiscent of development of cortical laminated structures. In the cortex of those in the reeler mouse (4, 5). It is currently believed that the adult animals, Reln is expressed primarily in g-aminobutyric protein encoded by this gene acts downstream of Reln in a acid (GABA)ergic neurons and is secreted into perineuronal signaling pathway that controls laminar corticogenesis and the nets. However, only 50–60% of GABAergic interneurons ex- hippocampal and cerebellar development in mammalian brain press Reln. We have characterized this subpopulation of (6). cortical GABAergic neurons that expresses Reln by using two In adult telencephalon, Reln is preferentially expressed in strategies: (i) a double immunolabeling procedure to deter- GABAergic neurons (7, 8), and Dab1 is expressed predomi- mine the colocalization of Reln with neuropeptides and Ca21- nantly in pyramidal cells, as well as in a small population of binding proteins and (ii) a combination of Golgi staining and non-pyramidal cells (9).
    [Show full text]
  • And Parvalbumin-Expressing Cortical Interneurons in a Mouse Model Of
    Impaired excitability of somatostatin- and PNAS PLUS parvalbumin-expressing cortical interneurons in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome Chao Taia, Yasuyuki Abea,b, Ruth E. Westenbroeka, Todd Scheuera, and William A. Catteralla,1 aDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and bMedicinal Safety Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo 134-8630, Japan Contributed by William A. Catterall, June 17, 2014 (sent for review May 6, 2014) Haploinsufficiency of the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.1 18, 19). In layer V of the cerebral cortex, PV-expressing fast- causes Dravet syndrome, an intractable developmental epilepsy spiking interneurons and SST-expressing Martinotti cells each syndrome with seizure onset in the first year of life. Specific het- account for ∼40% of interneurons, and these interneurons are erozygous deletion of NaV1.1 in forebrain GABAergic-inhibitory the major inhibitory regulators of cortical network activity (17, neurons is sufficient to cause all the manifestations of Dravet syn- 20). Layer V PV interneurons make synapses on the soma and drome in mice, but the physiological roles of specific subtypes of proximal dendrites of pyramidal neurons (18, 19), where they GABAergic interneurons in the cerebral cortex in this disease are mediate fast and powerful inhibition (21, 22). Selective hetero- unknown. Voltage-clamp studies of dissociated interneurons from zygous deletion of Scn1a in neocortical PV interneurons increases cerebral cortex did not detect a significant effect of the Dravet susceptibility to chemically induced seizures (23), spontaneous syndrome mutation on sodium currents in cell bodies. However, seizures, and premature death (24), indicating that this cell type current-clamp recordings of intact interneurons in layer V of neo- may contribute to Scn1a deficits.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide-Containing Cells Among Gabaergic Cell Subtypes in Rat Frontal Cortex
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 15, 1996, 76(8):2701-2715 Physiological and Morphological Identification of Somatostatin- or Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide-Containing Cells among GABAergic Cell Subtypes in Rat Frontal Cortex Yasuo Kawaguchi and Yoshiyuki Kubota Labora tory for Neural Circuits, Bio- Mimetic Control Research Center, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (R/KEN), Nagoya 456, Japan Physiological and morphological characteristics of GABAer- in deep layers). Some of the Martinotti cells in layer V also gic nonpyramidal cells in frontal cortex of young rats identi- contained calbindin Dpak. VIP cells included neurons the fied immunohistochemically as containing somatostatin or main descending axons of which had more descending than vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) were studied in vitro ascending collaterals (bipolar cells and double bouquet by whole-cell recording and biocytin injection. We have cells). Two other morphological forms of the VIP cells were found that most somatostatin- or VIP-containing neurons those with short descending axons with collaterals bearing were different from two other types of GABAergic cells, the multiple boutons on other cell bodies (small basket cells) or parvalbumin-containing fast-spiking cells and the late- with short ascending main axons with collaterals forming spiking cells (neurogliaform cells). In response to injected arcades (arcade cells). Some of these neurons also con- currents, somatostatin- or VIP-containing nonpyramidal cells tained calretinin. From these results, it appears that the showed either bursts of a few spikes on a slow-depolarizing GABAergic neurons controlling circuits in the neocortical hump, burst-spiking nonpyramidal cells, or single spikes only layers may be characterized further based on whether they on depolarization, regular-spiking nonpyramidal cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Layer VI in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex: Golgi Study and Sublaminar Origins of Projection Neurons
    THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY 404:332–358 (1999) Layer VI in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex: Golgi Study and Sublaminar Origins of Projection Neurons JORGE J. PRIETO1* AND JEFFERY A. WINER2 1Department of Histology, Institute of Neurosciences, University Miguel Herna´ ndez, 03550 San Juan, Alicante, Spain 2Division of Neurobiology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720–3200 ABSTRACT The organization of layer VI in cat primary auditory cortex (AI) was studied in mature specimens. Golgi-impregnated neurons were classified on the basis of their dendritic and somatic form. Ipsilateral and contralateral projection neurons and the corticogeniculate cells of origin were labeled with retrograde tracers and their profiles were compared with the results from Golgi studies. Layer VI was divided into a superficial half (layer VIa) with many pyramidal neurons and a deeper part (layer VIb) that is dominated by horizontal cells. Nine types of neuron were identified; four classes had subvarieties. Classical pyramidal cells and star, fusiform, tangential, and inverted pyramidal cells occur. Nonpyramidal neurons were Martinotti, multipolar stellate, bipolar, and horizontal cells. This variety of neurons distin- guished layer VI from other AI layers. Pyramidal neuron dendrites contributed to the vertical, modular organization in AI, although their apical processes did not project beyond layer IV. Their axons had vertical, intrinsic processes as well as corticofugal branches. Horizontal cell dendrites extended laterally up to 700 µm and could integrate thalamic input across wide expanses of the tonotopic domain. Connectional experiments confirmed the sublaminar arrangement seen in Nissl material. Commissural cells were concentrated in layer VIa, whereas corticocortical neurons were more numerous in layer VIb.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Inhibition by Martinotti Interneurons Is Facilitated by Cholinergic Inputs in Human and Mouse Neocortex
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06628-w OPEN Lateral inhibition by Martinotti interneurons is facilitated by cholinergic inputs in human and mouse neocortex Joshua Obermayer1, Tim S. Heistek1, Amber Kerkhofs1, Natalia A. Goriounova 1, Tim Kroon1,3, Johannes C. Baayen2, Sander Idema2, Guilherme Testa-Silva1,4, Jonathan J. Couey1,5 & Huibert D. Mansvelder 1 1234567890():,; A variety of inhibitory pathways encompassing different interneuron types shape activity of neocortical pyramidal neurons. While basket cells (BCs) mediate fast lateral inhibition between pyramidal neurons, Somatostatin-positive Martinotti cells (MCs) mediate a delayed form of lateral inhibition. Neocortical circuits are under control of acetylcholine, which is crucial for cortical function and cognition. Acetylcholine modulates MC firing, however, precisely how cholinergic inputs affect cortical lateral inhibition is not known. Here, we find that cholinergic inputs selectively augment and speed up lateral inhibition between pyramidal neurons mediated by MCs, but not by BCs. Optogenetically activated cholinergic inputs depolarize MCs through activation of ß2 subunit-containing nicotinic AChRs, not muscarinic AChRs, without affecting glutamatergic inputs to MCs. We find that these mechanisms are conserved in human neocortex. Cholinergic inputs thus enable cortical pyramidal neurons to recruit more MCs, and can thereby dynamically highlight specific circuit motifs, favoring MC- mediated pathways over BC-mediated pathways. 1 Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands. 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands. 3Present address: MRC Centre-Developmental Neurobiology, King’s college London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Enigmatic Cortical Calretinin-Expressing Interneurons
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 24 June 2014 NEUROANATOMY doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00052 Revisiting enigmatic cortical calretinin-expressing interneurons Bruno Cauli 1,2,3*, Xiaojuan Zhou 4, Ludovic Tricoire 1,2,3, Xavier Toussay 1,2,3 and Jochen F. Staiger 4* 1 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC University Paris 06, UM CR18, Neuroscience Paris Seine, Paris, France 2 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 8246, Neuroscience Paris Seine, Paris, France 3 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UMR-S 1130, Neuroscience Paris Seine, Paris, France 4 Institute for Neuroanatomy, UMG, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany Edited by: Cortical calretinin (CR)-expressing interneurons represent a heterogeneous subpopulation Zsofia Magloczky, Hungarian of about 10–30% of GABAergic interneurons, which altogether total ca. 12–20% of all Academy of Sciences, Hungary cortical neurons. In the rodent neocortex, CR cells display different somatodendritic Reviewed by: morphologies ranging from bipolar to multipolar but the bipolar cells and their variations José A. Armengol, University Pablo de Olavide, Spain dominate. They are also diverse at the molecular level as they were shown to Fiorenzo Conti, Universita express numerous neuropeptides in different combinations including vasoactive intestinal Politecnica delle Marche, Italy polypeptide (VIP), cholecystokinin (CCK), neurokinin B (NKB) corticotrophin releasing *Correspondence: factor (CRF), enkephalin (Enk) but also neuropeptide Y (NPY) and somatostatin (SOM) Bruno Cauli, CNRS-UPMC, to a lesser extent. CR-expressing interneurons exhibit different firing behaviors such as Neuroscience Paris Seine, 9 Quai Saint Bernard, 75005 Paris, France adapting, bursting or irregular. They mainly originate from the caudal ganglionic eminence e-mail: [email protected]; (CGE) but a subpopulation also derives from the dorsal part of the medial ganglionic Jochen F.Staiger, Institute for eminence (MGE).
    [Show full text]
  • A 'Marginal' Tale: the Development of the Neocortical Layer 1
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2020 A ’Marginal’ tale: the development of the neocortical layer 1 Gesuita, Lorenzo ; Karayannis, Theofanis Abstract: The development of neocortical layer 1 is a very dynamic process and the scene of multiple transient events, with Cajal-Retzius cell death being one of the most characteristic ones. Layer 1 is also the route of migration for a substantial number of GABAergic interneurons during embryogenesis and where some of which will ultimately remain in the adult. The two cell types, together with a diverse set of incoming axons and dendrites, create an early circuit that will dramatically change in structure and function in the adult cortex to give prominence to inhibition. Through the engagement of a diverse set of GABAergic inhibitory cells by bottom-up and top-down inputs, adult layer 1 becomes a powerful computational platform for the neocortex. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.09.002 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-200487 Journal Article Published Version The following work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Originally published at: Gesuita, Lorenzo; Karayannis, Theofanis (2020). A ’Marginal’ tale: the development of the neocortical layer 1. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 66:37-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.09.002 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect A ‘Marginal’ tale: the development of the neocortical layer 1 Lorenzo Gesuita and Theofanis Karayannis The development of neocortical layer 1 is a very dynamic diverse neuronal sources [2 ].
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuron Phenotype Ontology: a FAIR Approach to Proposing and Classifying Neuronal Types
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.278879; this version posted September 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. The Neuron Phenotype Ontology: A FAIR Approach to Proposing and Classifying Neuronal Types Thomas H. Gillespie 1 (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-4801) Shreejoy Tripathy2,3 (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-9061) Mohameth François Sy (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-9838) Maryann E. Martone 1, (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-3871) Sean L. Hill2,3,4 (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8055-860X) 1Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto 3Krembil Center for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health: Toronto 4Blue Brain Project, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Campus Biotech, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Corresponding Author: Sean Hill, Ph.D., [email protected] Blue Brain Project Campus Biotech, EPFL chemin des Mines, 9 Geneva, Switzerland CH-1202 Acknowledgements: This work was supported by NIH Brain Initiative award 5U24MH114827-04, a Canadian Institute for Health Research post-doctoral fellowship and National Institutes of Health grant MH111099, the Krembil Foundation, and by funding to the Blue Brain Project, a research center of the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), from the Swiss government’s ETH Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology . Meetings supporting this work were facilitated by the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF) through the Neuroinformatics for cell types special interest group.
    [Show full text]
  • Development, Diversity and Death of MGE-Derived Cortical Interneurons
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Development, Diversity, and Death of MGE-Derived Cortical Interneurons Rhîannan H. Williams 1 and Therese Riedemann 2,* 1 Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Centre for Environmental Health, Institute for Neurogenomics, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; [email protected] 2 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Biomedical Center, Physiological Genomics, Grosshaderner Str. 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In the mammalian brain, cortical interneurons (INs) are a highly diverse group of cells. A key neurophysiological question concerns how each class of INs contributes to cortical circuit function and whether specific roles can be attributed to a selective cell type. To address this question, researchers are integrating knowledge derived from transcriptomic, histological, electrophysiologi- cal, developmental, and functional experiments to extensively characterise the different classes of INs. Our hope is that such knowledge permits the selective targeting of cell types for therapeutic endeavours. This review will focus on two of the main types of INs, namely the parvalbumin (PV+) or somatostatin (SOM+)-containing cells, and summarise the research to date on these classes. Keywords: GABA; cortical interneurons; somatostatin; parvalbumin; interneuron diversity; interneuron development 1. Introduction Citation: Williams, R.H.; The cortex of the mammalian brain is composed of two main neuronal groups: pro- Riedemann, T. Development, jection neurons and interneurons (INs) [1–8]. Projection neurons are cells whose axons Diversity, and Death of MGE-Derived extend from the region where they are located to other brain areas and/or to the spinal Cortical Interneurons. Int. J. Mol. Sci. cord.
    [Show full text]
  • Neocortical Layer 4 in Adult Mouse Differs in Major Cell Types and Circuit
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/507293; this version posted December 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Neocortical layer 4 in adult mouse differs in major cell types 2 and circuit organization between primary sensory areas 3 4 Scala F.*1,2, Kobak D.*3, Shan S.1,2, Bernaerts Y.3, Laturnus S.3, Cadwell C.R.4, Hartmanis L.5, 5 Castro J. 1,2, Tan Z.H. 1,2, Sandberg R.5, Berens P.3,6, Jiang X.1,2,7, Tolias A.S.1,2,8 6 7 1 Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA 8 2 Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 9 Texas, USA 10 3 Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany 11 4 Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 12 USA 13 5 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 14 6 Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany 15 7 Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, 16 8 Department of Electrical and Computational Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 17 USA 18 19 * Equally contributed 20 Corresponding authors: Andreas S Tolias [email protected] 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/507293; this version posted December 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • Roles of Cajal-Retzius Cells Ioana Genescu
    Assembling layer 1 of the neocortex : roles of Cajal-Retzius cells Ioana Genescu To cite this version: Ioana Genescu. Assembling layer 1 of the neocortex : roles of Cajal-Retzius cells. Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]. Université Paris sciences et lettres, 2020. English. NNT : 2020UPSLE007. tel-03188109 HAL Id: tel-03188109 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03188109 Submitted on 1 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Préparée à l’Institut de Biologie de l’École Normale Supérieure L'assemblage de la couche 1 du néocortex : Rôles des cellules de Cajal-Retzius Assembling layer 1 of the neocortex: Roles of Cajal-Retzius cells Soutenue par Composition du jury : Ioana GENESCU Patricia, GASPAR Le 08 octobre 2020 DR, Institut du Cerveau, Paris Présidente Alain, CHÉDOTAL DR, Institut de la Vision, Paris Rapporteur Ecole doctorale n° 515 Denis, JABAUDON Prof., Université de Genève, Genève Rapporteur Complexité du Vivant Alexandre, BAFFET CR., Institut Curie, Paris Examinateur Alessandra, PIERANI DR., Institut Imagine, IPNP, Paris Examinatrice Spécialité Sonia, GAREL Neurosciences Prof., IBENS, Collège de France, Paris Directrice de thèse Biologie du développement TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 10 INTRODUCTION 14 Preablme 15 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions
    NOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS The copyright law of the United States [Title 17, United States Code] governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction.One of these specified conditions is that the reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or repro- duction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that use may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgement, fullfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. No further reproduction and distribution of this copy is permitted by transmission or any other means. TINS 1716 No. of Pages 15 Trends in Neurosciences Review Cortical disinhibitory circuits: cell types, connectivity and function Klas Kullander1,* and Lisa Topolnik2,3,* The concept of a dynamic excitation/inhibition balance tuned by circuit disinhibi- Highlights tion, which can shape information flow during complex behavioral tasks, has arisen In neural circuits, disinhibition (or inhibi- as an important and conserved information-processing motif. In cortical circuits, tion of inhibition) commonly operates different subtypes of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons are connected to each in the form of two inhibitory neurons connected to one another in series. other, offering an anatomical foundation for disinhibitory processes. Moreover, a Disinhibition requires an inhibitory subpopulation of GABAergic cells that express vasoactive intestinal polypeptide neuron in an active state such that (VIP) preferentially innervates inhibitory interneurons, highlighting their central role the activity of this neuron can be in disinhibitory modulation.
    [Show full text]