DOCSLIB.ORG

The Global Occupational Health Network ISSUE No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Global Occupational Health Network ISSUE No. 7SUMMERWINTER 2003 GOHNETGOHNET GOHNET NEWSLETTER Dear GOHNET members and future members, Reducing worker exposure by using the This special edition 7th GOHNET Newsletter will inform you about Occupational Risk Management Toolbox new practical tools to assess and manage risks at workplace level based Elaine M. Papp ([email protected]), OSHA on the concept of “Control Banding”. GOHNET Issue 5 introduced Gerry Eijkemans ([email protected]), WHO, Occupational Health Team readers to one of these control banding tools, the International Chemical Carolyn Vickers ([email protected]), WHO, IPCS Control Toolkit. This Toolkit responds to the need for practical risk Introduction assessment and management approaches that can be applied across the People worldwide face occupational health and safety hazards daily. Over board for all the chemicals used in a workplace, rather than a chemical- the years, the global occupational hygiene community has worked by-chemical approach based on occupational hygiene measurements diligently to develop ways to protect workers in both developed and for the fraction of chemicals where occupational exposure limits have developing nations, in workplaces of all types and sizes. The greatest been set. challenge has been to develop occupational health programs that are feasible in developing nations, as well as in small and medium enterprises Scarcity or resources, both human and financial, are an issue in the (SMEs) where resources and technical expertise may be scarce. occupational health and occupational hygiene practice globally. The The Occupational Risk Management Toolbox (Toolbox), has been Toolkit is being developed for use particularly in small and medium- developed internationally and provides a creative solution to this difficult sized enterprises in developed countries, and in developing countries. problem. The Toolbox is envisioned to contain a variety of Toolkits, The benefits of this approach have been demonstrated in the UK, where which are semi-quantitative risk management tools; each designed to the concept has been successfully implemented as the “COSHH address a specific occupational hazard. The first toolkit is the International Essentials”. Chemical Control Toolkit (Chemical Toolkit), which was developed for the International Labour Organization (ILO) by the International Recognizing that chemicals represent only one of a number of hazards Occupational Hygiene Association (IOHA) as a contribution to the in a workplace, this GOHNET issue describes how the control banding International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) (comprising the concept can be used to build additional tools for inclusion in an ILO, the WHO and the United Nations Environment Programme). “Occupational Risk Management Toolbox”. An obvious addition would The underlying concept for the Toolkits is commonly called “control be an ergonomic toolkit to target musculoskeletal disorders, which are banding.” It is an occupational risk assessment and management a major problem world wide. instrument for use without on-site technical experts and expensive exposure measurements. The control banding concept has been used to The Occupational Risk Management Toolbox is an exciting development address chemical hazards by many organizations: governmental, corporate with great potential for managing workplace risks. However there is and non-governmental. much work to be done by a range of stakeholders, including those in Due to the success of control banding of chemicals, particularly COSHH industry, government, employers, unions, research institutions, etc. A Essentials, a tool designed by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) of recently agreed Global Strategy for the Implementation of the Toolbox the United Kingdom (UK), the Chemical Toolkit was developed. As it is included in full in this issue of GOHNET as a charge to the was underway, the global occupational health and safety community occupational community to work collectively to bring this to fruition. Enjoy your reading. Evelyn Kortum ([email protected]), Editor IN THIS ISSUE: World Health Organization Occupational & Environmental Health Programme Department of Protection of the Human Environment Reducing worker exposure by using the Occupational 20 Avenue Appia; CH - 1211 Geneva 27 Risk Management Toolbox 1 Fax: +41.22.791 13 83 Occupational Risk Management Toolbox - Global www.who.int/oeh Implementation Strategy 3 Abbreviations: COSHH essentials - easy steps to control chemicals 5 Globally Harmonized System 7 CB Control Banding nd GHS Globally Harmonized System Report from the 2 International Control Banding Workshop 7 ITG International Technical Group The practical application in developing countries 9 IPCS International Programme for Chemical Safety Websites for further information 10 MSDS Material Safety Data Sheets OELs Occupational Exposure Limits Contributors’ information 11 SMEs Small and Medium Enterprises WHO Contacts 11 Toolbox Occupational Risk Management Toolbox GOHNET Member Application Form 12 T h e G l o b a l O c c u p a t i o n a l H e a l t h N e t w o r k 1 recognized that the control banding concept could revolutionize Why are chemicals the first ones to be addressed? workplace health and safety worldwide. This concept could be applied The use of chemicals in manufacturing, the service industry, cleaning, to a range of hazards – physical, biological, and ergonomic. agriculture and other industries, is increasing in both developed and Control Banding toolkits are user-friendly, simple matrices that provide developing nations worldwide. Although these chemicals enhance our the user with guidance for controlling exposures to hazards. If adequately lives, they also have the potential for causing serious harm, especially to trained, people who have little or no occupational hygiene experience, people whose jobs require them to work with the chemicals on a daily like a small employer, can implement the hazard assessment process and basis. understand the sound occupational hygiene advice in the form of Workers deserve protection from the harmful effects of the chemicals guidance sheets. The simplicity of the toolkits is the outcome of extensive, with which they work. Yet, thousands of chemicals remain unregulated complex work done by experts behind the scenes who analyze the hazard, without specific occupational exposure limits. Only about 1000 of the develop a predictive model for exposure, determine the best methods chemicals in use today have Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs)1. for exposure control and develop guidance documents. Experts rely The process of setting OELs is resource-intensive. It is infeasible to do heavily on good quality data to state with some confidence that a specific all the studies necessary to derive and assign accurate OELs, and it is technique will reduce the exposure by a predictable amount and, thus impossible to regulate all of the chemicals in use today. Even when reduce a hazardous risk to an acceptable level. regulated, enforcement often lags behind. Toolkits provide guidance for the more routine occupational hygiene SMEs often lack financial and technical resources to assess and ensure problems. Since they do not use on-site experts to conduct exposure appropriate protection for their workers. Economies in transition and monitoring, the focus for risk management shifts from measurement to developing nations also lack adequate access to appropriately experienced on-site exposure control. Yet, Toolkits do not replace the need for experts. people to provide assessment and control of occupational hazards. An In fact, the method itself recommends that some situations be dealt alternative, user-friendly system to protect workers from adverse health with only by experts on the subject. Moreover, when experts are scarce, effects of hazardous chemicals was needed. then this approach allows them to have more time to concentrate on the The Chemical Toolkit was developed by a team of occupational hygienists more complicated risk assessment and management processes. assembled by IOHA with representatives from Great Britain, USA, Toolkits offer opportunities to overcome the scarcity of technical expertise Southern Africa and Asia. It was modelled after the COSHH Essentials, in developing nations and help leverage resources in developed nations. the Chemical Toolkit developed by the Health and Safety Executive Employers can save money on hazard assessment and, therefore, have (HSE) in the United Kingdom. Additional articles in this issue of more to spend on worker protection. The international occupational GOHNET discuss the COSSH Essentials and the Chemical Toolkit. health and safety community anticipates that this easy-to-use system Advantages will result in higher levels of worker protection around the world and The Toolbox is: will reduce the number of occupational accidents and illnesses. ■ complementary to traditional hazard control systems Development of the Toolbox ■ simple and easy to use The process used to develop the Toolbox has been called control banding ■ cost-effective because hazards, risks and controls are grouped into bands. Experts form ■ beneficial for SMEs risk bands by combining hazard bands and exposure bands into a “level ■ beneficial for emerging economies and developing nations of concern.” They then group controls into bands, too, since risk can be ■ reduced to acceptable levels by employing adequate, sometimes simple applicable in most settings exposure
Recommended publications
  • Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and Considerations During Severe Shortages Interim Guidance 6 April 2020

    Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and Considerations During Severe Shortages Interim Guidance 6 April 2020

    Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages Interim guidance 6 April 2020 Background • avoiding touching your eyes, nose, and mouth; • practicing respiratory hygiene by coughing or This document summarizes WHO’s recommendations for the sneezing into a bent elbow or tissue and then rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in health immediately disposing of the tissue; care and home care settings, as well as during the handling of • wearing a medical mask if you have respiratory cargo; it also assesses the current disruption of the global symptoms and performing hand hygiene after supply chain and considerations for decision making during disposing of the mask; severe shortages of PPE. • routine cleaning and disinfection of environmental and other frequently touched surfaces. This document does not include recommendations for members of the general community. See here: for more In health care settings, the main infection prevention and information about WHO advice of use of masks in the general control (IPC) strategies to prevent or limit COVID-19 community. transmission include the following:2 In this context, PPE includes gloves, medical/surgical face 1. ensuring triage, early recognition, and source control masks - hereafter referred as “medical masks”, goggles, face (isolating suspected and confirmed COVID-19 shield, and gowns, as well as items for specific procedures- patients); 3 filtering facepiece respirators (i.e. N95 or FFP2 or 2. applying standard precautions for all patients and FFP3 standard or equivalent) - hereafter referred to as including diligent hand hygiene; “respirators" - and aprons. This document is intended for 3.
  • Job Hazard Analysis

    Job Hazard Analysis

    Identifying and Evaluating Hazards in Research Laboratories Guidelines developed by the Hazards Identification and Evaluation Task Force of the American Chemical Society’s Committee on Chemical Safety Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society Table of Contents FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 5 Task Force Members ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1. SCOPE AND APPLICATION ..................................................................................................................... 7 2. DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION ................................................................................... 10 4. ESTABLISHING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................... 14 5. CHOOSING AND USING A TECHNIQUE FROM THIS GUIDE ................................................................. 17 6. CHANGE CONTROL .............................................................................................................................. 19 7. ASSESSING
  • Safety Introduction WARNING! This Test System Is Capable of Producing Potentially Lethal Instrument Safety Voltages

    Safety Introduction WARNING! This Test System Is Capable of Producing Potentially Lethal Instrument Safety Voltages

    Ultra System Overview Introduction Safety Introduction WARNING! This test system is capable of producing potentially lethal Instrument Safety voltages. All internal areas of the system must be accessed and Information serviced ONLY by trained and qualified personnel. Do not perform any servicing other than that contained in this documentation and This section describes the UltraFLEX read all safety information before attempting any operation or test system safety precautions. The maintenance procedures. test system generates and uses AC and DC high power and high voltage. The purpose of this section is to identify the hazards in the system to !!CAUTION! operation, service and applications personnel. Such personnel should Always wear safety glasses or safety goggles when working on the test system. read and understand this information before operating or servicing the system. !!CAUTION! Internal sheet metal portions of the test system may contain sharp edges, use care when working inside the test system. Page 1 of 3 Rev. 0736 Ultra System Overview Introduction General Safety Information Subsystem Safety Information The following general safety Table 1 identifies the safety concerns for the UltraFLEX subsystems. information is included in this section: Table 1 • General Safety Information • Safety Terms, Labels and Subsystem Safety Lockout/ Electrostatic Weight Liquid Safety Symbols Section Tagout Discharge Safety • Lockout/Tagout Computer Safety XX • ESD Damage Prevention and Control Measure Cooling XXX • Safety Certification DIB 24-Slot Interface XX • Material Handling Digital Signal Processor XX • Switches and Protective Barriers • Weight Safety Manipulator XX • Anti-Tip Fixture PDU XXX • Torque Specifications System Monitor and XXX Note Controller (SMC) Primary Support Board only.
  • GUIDELINE Safety Data Sheets and Pathogen Safety Data Sheets

    GUIDELINE Safety Data Sheets and Pathogen Safety Data Sheets

    GUIDELINE UBC-RMS-OHS-GDL-14-001 Department of Risk Management Services Effective date: January 2, 2014 Review date: November 27, 2017 www.rms.ubc.ca Supersedes: Previous version Safety Data Sheets and Pathogen Safety Data Sheets 1. SCOPE This guideline provides directions for Regulatory and Best Practices for the use of Safety Data Sheets and Pathogen Safety Data Sheets (SDS and PSDS). It applies to all UBC employees working with chemicals and/or pathogens. 2. PURPOSE Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) and Pathogen Safety Data Sheets (PSDSs) are essential components in ensuring occupational health and safety within potentially hazardous environments. 3. BACKGROUND Under the new Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS 2015) the formerly known Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) became the Safety Data Sheet. The change is happening in several phases. After December 1, 2018, WHMIS 2015 will be the only system in use. Until then, employers are allowed in the workplace both MSDSs and SDSs. Important information regarding chemical, physiochemical, hazard/toxicity, required personal protective equipment, etc. are found on the SDS. In particular, WHMIS-related information will be found on the label of the agent of concern, with additional and more comprehensive information detailed in the SDS. Accordingly, the SDS for any new chemical, chemical mixture, or unknown agent should be fully reviewed prior to working with it. It is also important to note that suppliers are required to provide a SDS for each reagent (may be restricted to first time ordering). Similarly, Pathogen Safety Data Sheets (PSDSs) provide critical information regarding infectious materials, including the mode of transmission, disease symptoms, decontamination methods, PPE, and containment requirements.
  • Chemical Hazards and Toxic Substances Chemical Hazards and Toxic Substances

    Chemical Hazards and Toxic Substances Chemical Hazards and Toxic Substances

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OSHA Menu OSHA STANDARDS TOPICS HELP AND RESOURCES Contact Us FAQ A to Z Index English Español Safety and Health Topics / Chemical Hazards and Toxic Substances Chemical Hazards and Toxic Substances Chemical Hazards and Toxic Substances Menu Overview What are chemical hazards and toxic substances? Chemical hazards and toxic substances pose a wide range of health hazards (such as irritation, sensitization, and carcinogenicity) and physical hazards (such as flammability, corrosion, and explosibility). This page provides basic information about chemical hazards and toxic substances in the workplace. While not all hazards associated with every chemical and toxic substance are addressed here, we do provide relevant links to other pages with additional information about hazards and methods to control exposure in the workplace. How does OSHA regulate worker exposure to chemicals? Worker education and training (Hazard Communication Standard) 29 CFR 1910.1200, 1915.1200, 1917.28, 1918.90, and 1926.59 OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) is designed to ensure that information about chemical and toxic substance hazards in the workplace and associated protective measures is disseminated to workers. In order to ensure chemical safety in the workplace, information about the identities and hazards of the chemicals must be available and understandable to workers. OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) requires the development and dissemination of such information: Chemical manufacturers and importers are required to evaluate the hazards of the chemicals they produce or import, and prepare labels and safety data sheets to convey the hazard information to their downstream customers; All employers with hazardous chemicals in their workplaces must have labels and safety data sheets for their exposed workers, and train them to handle the chemicals appropriately.
  • Occupational Hygiene Report Writing

    Occupational Hygiene Report Writing

    BACK TO BASICS PEER REVIEWED Occupational hygiene report writing Peter-John “Jakes” ABSTRACT Jacobs Occupational hygiene reports record occupational hygiene exposure assessments. Although their (MPH Occ. Hygiene) Cas Badenhorst (PhD purpose and format can vary, they must provide adequate information for managing occupational Occ. Hygiene) risks and so ensure the health and safety of employees. This article describes how to write a good occupational hygiene report, specifi cally with respect to the minimum content and style. Corresponding author: E-mail: jakes.jacobs2@ Key words: occupational hygiene report, content, standards sasol.com INTRODUCTION When the target audience is the senior management of an The fi ndings of occupational hygiene exposure assessments organisation, the report needs to be concise and prefer- are recorded in occupational hygiene reports. The purpose ably no longer than one page with the technical and other of these reports can vary, for example providing commu- information contained in an appendix. A popularly recounted nication to management, employees, health and safety anecdote is that the average reading ability of a company’s representatives, engineers, etc. regarding occupational chief executive offi cer is equitable to that of a 14-year-old, the hazards present in the workplace, addressing emergencies reason being that they are burdened with massive amounts and, importantly, provide practical exposure control advice of data that must be digested on a daily basis. This report and, are critical in managing occupational risks.1 Although can typically be a summary of fi ndings as described in the several formats for the reports exist, they should all serve detailed occupational hygiene report.
  • Occupational Exposure to Hot Environments: Florida Workers Need Help

    Occupational Exposure to Hot Environments: Florida Workers Need Help

    Occupational Exposure to Hot Environments: Florida Workers Need Help Margaret Wan, MSPH Abstract This article draws the attention of the Florida community - employees, employers, public health practitioners, and policy-makers - to an occupational hazard particularly relevant to Florida, namely, exposure to hot environments in the workplace. Heat stress disorders adversely affect worker safety and productivity. In extreme cases, they may endanger the life of a worker. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has not set a standard for heat stress requiring employers to control exposure. More than 30 years after the recommendations of the Standards Advisory Committee on Heat Stress, the time for such a standard is overdue. Florida Public Health Review, 2004; 1: 53-55 Introduction Company, 1983). Many of these controls can be applied Working in a hot environment induces a in various work situations, indoor or outdoor. The lack physiological strain on workers. Extreme variations of governmental regulation requiring employers to from the internal body temperature of 37oC (98.6oF) adopt one or more of these steps means, however, that interfere with body functions and normal homeostasis. less conscientious employers lack the incentive to act to Heat stress disorders include heat stroke, heat alleviate the problem, and thus, afford workers exhaustion, and heat rash. They adversely affect worker sufficient protection. safety and productivity because they can cause distraction, reduce concentration, and lead to fatigue Nonexistence of Occupational Safety and Health (Bishop, 1997). In acute cases, they may cause brain Administration Standard damage or death. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act Heat stress disorders may be a workplace (1970), two federal agencies are responsible for hazard in certain industries (e.g., foundries) located promoting occupational safety and health in the United anywhere in the country.
  • Cem-Seal-SDS Sheet

    Cem-Seal-SDS Sheet

    Cem-Seal ICP Building Solutions Group/Pli-Dek Version No: 1.2 Issue Date: 10/26/2020 Safety Data Sheet according to OSHA HazCom Standard (2012) requirements Print Date: 10/26/2020 S.GHS.USA.EN SECTION 1 Identification Product Identifier Product name Cem-Seal Synonyms Not Available Other means of identification Not Available Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use Relevant identified uses Specialty floor coating Name, address, and telephone number of the chemical manufacturer, importer, or other responsible party Registered company name ICP Building Solutions Group/Pli-Dek Address 4565 W. Watkins Street Phoenix AZ Not applicable Telephone 623-435-2277 Fax Not Available Website www.ICPGROUP.com Email Not Available Emergency phone number Association / Organisation ChemTel Emergency telephone 1-800-255-3924 numbers Other emergency telephone 1-813-248-0585 numbers SECTION 2 Hazard(s) identification Classification of the substance or mixture NFPA 704 diamond Note: The hazard category numbers found in GHS classification in section 2 of this SDSs are NOT to be used to fill in the NFPA 704 diamond. Blue = Health Red = Fire Yellow = Reactivity White = Special (Oxidizer or water reactive substances) Classification Acute Aquatic Hazard Category 3 Label elements Hazard pictogram(s) Not Applicable Signal word Not Applicable Hazard statement(s) H402 Harmful to aquatic life. Hazard(s) not otherwise classified Not Applicable Precautionary statement(s) General P101 If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. P102 Keep out of reach of children. Page 1 continued... Version No: 1.2 Page 2 of 8 Issue Date: 10/26/2020 Cem-Seal Print Date: 10/26/2020 Precautionary statement(s) Prevention P273 Avoid release to the environment.
  • Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments

    Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments

    Criteria for a Recommended Standard Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Cover photo by Thinkstock© Criteria for a Recommended Standard Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments Revised Criteria 2016 Brenda Jacklitsch, MS; W. Jon Williams, PhD; Kristin Musolin, DO, MS; Aitor Coca, PhD; Jung-Hyun Kim, PhD; Nina Turner, PhD DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. Disclaimer Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations of websites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these websites. Ordering Information This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. To receive NIOSH documents or other information about occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH at Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) TTY: 1-888-232-6348 E-mail: [email protected] or visit the NIOSH website at www.cdc.gov/niosh. For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to NIOSH eNews by visiting www.cdc.gov/ niosh/eNews. Suggested Citation NIOSH [2016]. NIOSH criteria for a recommended standard: occupational exposure to heat and hot environments. By Jacklitsch B, Williams WJ, Musolin K, Coca A, Kim J-H, Turner N.
  • Required and Voluntary Occupational Use of Hazard Controls for COVID-19 Prevention in Non–Health Care Workplaces — United States, June 2020

    Required and Voluntary Occupational Use of Hazard Controls for COVID-19 Prevention in Non–Health Care Workplaces — United States, June 2020

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Required and Voluntary Occupational Use of Hazard Controls for COVID-19 Prevention in Non–Health Care Workplaces — United States, June 2020 Rachael M. Billock, PhD1; Matthew R. Groenewold, PhD1; Hannah Free, MPH1; Marie Haring Sweeney, PhD1; Sara E. Luckhaupt, MD1 Certain hazard controls, including physical barriers, cloth Survey questions were administered by Porter Novelli Public face masks, and other personal protective equipment (PPE), are Services through the SummerStyles survey, one in a series of recommended to reduce coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) trans- annual surveys. Respondents were recruited randomly by mail mission in the workplace (1). Evaluation of occupational hazard using address-based probability sampling to represent the control use for COVID-19 prevention can identify inad- noninstitutionalized, adult U.S. population; surveys were con- equately protected workers and opportunities to improve use. ducted via an online panel in English, and data were weighted CDC’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health to match U.S. Current Population Survey (5) proportions.* used data from the June 2020 SummerStyles survey to charac- The June 2020 survey had a response rate of 62.7% (4,053) terize required and voluntary use of COVID-19–related occu- and included questions on COVID-19–related workplace pational hazard controls among U.S. non–health care workers. characteristics. Respondents who did not work (1,409; 35%) or A survey-weighted regression model was used to estimate the primarily
  • Guide to OH&S Certifications & Designations

    Guide to OH&S Certifications & Designations

    THIRD EDITION Guide to OH&S Certifications & Designations A Resource for Safety Practitioners, Employers, and those considering a Career in Occupational Health & Safety COHSPRAC CRST This guide is produced by the Canadian Society of Safety Engineering CSSE Guide to OH&S Certifications & Designations 1 A Guide for Employers and OH&S Practitioners This document has been prepared by Canadian Society of Safety Engineering (CSSE) in the pursuit of CSSE’s mission, vision and goals. All rights reserved. Permission to photocopy or download for individual use is granted. Further reproduction in any manner, including posting to a website, is prohibited without prior written permission of the publisher. Permission may be obtained by contacting the CSSE at [email protected]. © Canadian Society of Safety Engineering 468 Queen Street East, Suite LL-02 Toronto, Ontario M5A 1T7 Tel.: 416-646-1600 www.csse.org Third Edition September 2018 CSSE Guide to OH&S Certifications & Designations 2 A Guide for Employers and OH&S Practitioners PURPOSE OF THE GUIDE The Guide is intended to serve as a resource to employers when hiring a health and safety practitioner. It also provides guidance to future OH&S practitioners on the type of education, experience, and other qualifications being sought by employers. Information on both Canadian and International safety certifications and designations is provided, along with suggested competencies and qualifications for OH&S positions from entry to executive level. An interview guide is included to provide employers with suggested
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET Page 1 of 2 SECTION 1: PRODUCT and COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product: SURE-STEP™ Part Number: 3567000 Manufacturer: W

    SAFETY DATA SHEET Page 1 of 2 SECTION 1: PRODUCT and COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product: SURE-STEP™ Part Number: 3567000 Manufacturer: W

    SAFETY DATA SHEET Page 1 of 2 SECTION 1: PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product: SURE-STEP™ Part Number: 3567000 Manufacturer: W. R. MEADOWS, INC. Address: 300 Industrial Drive Hampshire, Illinois 60140 Telephone: (847) 214-2100 In case of emergency, dial (800) 424-9300 (CHEMTREC) Revision Date: 6/8/2021 Product Use: Additive for Non-Slip Surfaces SECTION 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION/EXPOSURE LIMITS HMIS HAZARD STATEMENTS |Health| | 1 | WARNING! |Flammability| | 1 | Direct contact may cause mechanical irritation. |Reactivity| | 0 | PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS |Personal Protection| | | Avoid direct contact. SECTION 3: HAZARDS COMPONENTS % by SARA Vapor Pressure LEL Chemical Name: CAS Number Weight 313 (mm Hg@20°C) (@25°C) 1. Polypropylene Homopolymer 9003-07-0 90-100 No N/A N/A N/A = Not Applicable Under the reporting requirements of Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1966 (SARA) and 40 CFR Part 372, chemicals listed on the 313 List (40 CFR Part 373.65) are identified under the heading "SARA 313." SECTION 4: EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID PROCEDURES EYE CONTACT: Flush eyes with water for fifteen minutes. If symptoms persist, seek medical attention. SKIN CONTACT: Rinse affected areas with water. INHALATION: Remove from exposure source. Treat symptomatically. INGESTION: Not expected to be an exposure route. Non-toxic if ingested. MOST IMPORTANT SYMPTOMS/EFFECTS, ACUTE AND CHRONIC: See Section Eleven for Symptoms/Effects. SECTION 5: FIRE AND EXPLOSIVES HAZARDS FLASHPOINT: Not applicable; product is a solid. EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Carbon dioxide, dry chemical, or fine water spray. CHEMICAL/COMBUSTION HAZARDS: Melts in proximity to fires resulting in slippery surfaces.