Shakespeare in Love
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship Conference
Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship Conference Oakland Marriott City Center Hotel October 11–14, 2018 Table of Contents Schedule of Events ....................................................... 2 Biographies/Titles/Abstracts .............................. 6 —In order of presentation Dark Lady Essays .......................................................23 Dark Lady Sonnets ....................................................29 Page 1 SOF Conference—Schedule of Events THURSDAY: October 11, 2018 10:00—1:00 Conference Registration 1:00—1:15 Welcome, Introductions and Orientation. 1:15—2:00 Wally Hurst: Blame It on the Bard: Why the Author ‘Shakespeare’ is Responsible for World War I and World War II. 2:00—2:45 David Rains Wallace: Shakespeare, Beowulf, and Wilderness. 2:45—3:15 Coffee/Tea Break 3:15—4:00 Theresa Lauricella: “I Took Thee for thy Better”: The Prestige of Polonius. 4:00—4:45 Robert Detobel (Read by Don Rubin): The Soul of Nero. 4:45—5:30 Steven Sabel: Not to Modernize: Why the ‘translating’ of the Bard’s texts to modern language corrupts performance of the works and further conceals the true author. 5:30—7:00 Hosted Wine and Cheese reception. FRIDAY: October 12, 2018 8:30—9:15 Julie Bianchi: Twins Separated at Birth? A Cultural and Genealogical Investigation of Two Identities Set in Stone. 9:15—9:30 John Hamill: Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship Research Grants Report 9:30—10:15 Michael Delahoyde and Coleen Moriarty: De Veres di Venezia 10:15—10:45 Coffee/Tea Break 10:45—12:30 Panel: An Oxfordian Timeline for Dating Shakespeare’s Plays: Ramon Jiménez, Katherine Chiljan, and Kevin Gilvary 12:30—1:30 Lunch (on own). 1:30—2:15 W. -
OLGA SANCHEZ: Director, Artistic Director • Think Fun, This Is An
OLGA SANCHEZ: Director, Artistic Director • Think fun, this is an opportunity to perform for an audience! • Be friendly as you introduce yourself in the beginning, and say thank you at end -- you're showing the auditors a little bit of who you are (not the characters in your monologues) -- and we want to know that the person we'll be working with is pleasant! • Please don't look at the auditors in the eye during your monologues. • If you're presenting two monologues think about the two different characters you are creating, how they stand, walk, talk -- show us you know how to create characters different from yourself and distinct in themselves. • Think about intention -- What does your character want? Does it achieve its intention by the end of the monologue? Your monologue is a mini-play, consider the beginning, middle and end. • Think about who you're talking to: A stranger? A close friend? An authority figure? • Please don't use props, they're distracting. • Please select monologues that are age-appropriate (that you might be cast in, age- wise) MARCI CROWSON: Director, Artistic Director DO: • Smile and say hello when you enter the room. • Introduce yourself (first and last name). • Tell the auditors what piece(s) you'll be performing, including playwright(s). • Choose pieces that are age appropriate for you and appropriate for the company/production you're auditioning for (i.e., don't choose Shakespeare if the company produces contemporary work, choose a comedic monologue if the play you're auditioning for is a comedy. It sounds so obvious, but you'd be surprised how many people do the opposite.) • Select pieces that CONTRAST with one another, if you're doing more than one -- show off your range (vocally, physically, stylistically). -
Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare
OPEN FORUM The Pages of The Oxfordian are open to all sides of the Authorship Question Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare David Kathman or the vast majority of Shake- speare scholars, there is no ‘au- thorship question’; they agree that F the works of William Shake- speare were written by William Shake- speare of Stratford-upon-Avon (allow- ing for some collaboration), and tend to ignore or dismiss anyone who claims oth- erwise. In the following pages I will try to explain, from the perspective of a Shake- speare scholar, why the Stratford Shakespeare’s authorship is so generally ac- cepted by historians, and why those historians do not take seriously the various attempts to deny that attribution. I realize from experience that this explanation is not likely to convince many committed antistratfordians, but at the very least I hope to correct some misconceptions about what Shakespeare scholars actually believe. For the purposes of argument, we can distinguish among three main strands of William Shakespeare’s biography, which I will call Stratford Shakespeare, Actor Shakespeare, and Author Shakespeare. Stratford Shakespeare was baptized in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1564, married Anne Hathaway in 1582, had three children with her, bought New Place in 1597 and various other properties in and around Stratford over the following decade, and was buried in there in 1616. Actor Shakespeare was a member of the Lord Chamberlain’s/King’s Men, the leading acting company in London from 1594 on, and an original sharer in the Globe and Blackfriars playhouses. Author Shakespeare signed the dedications of Venus and Adonis (1593) and The Rape of Lucrece (1594), and over the next twenty years was named on title 13 THE OXFORDIAN Volume XI 2009 Kathman pages as the author of numerous plays and poems, and was praised by such crit- ics as Francis Meres and Gabriel Harvey. -
Some Reflections on the Analysis of Discourse and Dramatic Text: Stoppard's Jumpers
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 8 (1995): 161-75 Some Reflections on the Analysis of Discourse and Dramatic Text: Stoppard's Jumpers Jesús-Manuel Nieto García Universidad de Jaén ABSTRACT Our proposal in this paper is basically to analyse dramatic texts according to the structure of those parts whose purpose is mainly dialogic in nature, mainly monologic, or, finally, those parts that emphasise the connection between writer and reader (or producer) from the organisational point of view. At the same time we also intend to study some basic pragmatic points such as reference, the informative nature of discourse, the kinds of illocutionary acts present in the text and the conversational norms broken. With this purpose in mind, we propose the application of a method of analysis of dramatic discourse to the play Jumpers, by Tom Stoppard. 1. Introduction and general layout of the analysis In recent years there have been many inherently discursive approaches to the analysis of drama, for instance, by Burton, Elam, Sherzer ("Dialogic Incongruities in the Theater of the Absurd" and "Langage litteraire et langage social"), Widdowson, Noguchi, Gautam, Gautam and Sharma, Golopentia-Eretescu, Simpson, Hermán, Short and Bennison.1 All these approaches somehow seem to miss the various interactive actions carried out by the text. From that point, we intend to evolve towards a method of analysis of drama covering this aspect. With this purpose in mind we cannot simply ignore other previous points which are essential to the analysis of any ldnd of discourse, and which are basically pragmatic in nature, but in any case the interactive purpose of the text itself is first and foremost and affects the analysis as a whole, and this is why our analysis of the dramatic text is presented in six columns, each corresponding to a different aspect concerning the pragmatic and interactive nature of the dramatic text. -
Shakes in Love STUDYGUIDE
Study Guide for Educators Based on the screenplay by Marc Norman and Tom Stoppard Adapted for the stage by Lee Hall Lyrics by Carolyn Leigh Music by Paddy Cunneen This production of Shakespeare In Love is generously sponsored by: Emily and Dene Hurlbert Linda Stafford Burrows Ron and Mary Nanning Ron Tindall, RN Shakespeare in Love is presented by special arrangement with Samuel French Inc 1 Welcome to the Pacific Conservatory Theatre A NOTE TO THE TEACHER Thank you for bringing your students to the Pacific Conservatory Theatre at Allan Hancock College. Here are some helpful hints for your visit to the Marian Theatre. The top priority of our staff is to provide an enjoyable day of live theatre for you and your students. We offer you this study guide as a tool to prepare your students prior to the performance. SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDENT ETIQUETTE Note-able behavior is a vital part of theater for youth. Going to the theater is not a casual event. It is a special occasion. If students are prepared properly, it will be a memorable, educational experience they will remember for years. 1. Have students enter the theater in a single file. Chaperones should be one adult for every ten students. Our ushers will assist you with locating your seats. Please wait until the usher has seated your party before any rearranging of seats to avoid injury and confusion. While seated, teachers should space themselves so they are visible, between every groups of ten students. Teachers and adults must remain with their group during the entire performance. -
From Sidney to Heywood: the Social Status of Commercial Theatre in Early Modern London
From Sidney to Heywood: the social status of commercial theatre in early modern London Romola Nuttall (King’s College London, UK) The Literary London Journal, Volume 14 Number 1 (Spring 2017) Abstract Thomas Heywood’s Apology for Actors (written c. 1608, published 1612) is one of the only stand-alone, printed deFences of the proFessional theatre to emerge from the early modern period. Even more significantly, it is ‘the only contemporary complete text we have – by an early modern actor about early modern actors’ (Griffith 191). This is rather surprising considering how famous playwrights and drama of that period have become, but it is revealing of attitudes towards the profession and the stage at the turn of the sixteenth century. Religious concerns Formed a central part of the heated public debate which contested the social value oF proFessional drama during the early modern era. Claims against the literary status of work produced for the commercial stage were also frequently levelled against the theatre from within the establishment, a prominent example being Sir Philip Sidney’s Defence of Poesie (written c. 1579, published 1595). Considering Heywood’s Apology in relation to Sidney’s Defence, and thinking particularly about the ways these treatises appropriate the classical idea oF mimesis and the consequent social value of literature, gives fresh insight into the changing status of drama in Shakespeare’s lifetime and how attitudes towards commercial theatre developed between the 1570s and 1610s. The following article explores these ideas within the framework of the London in which Heywood and his acting company lived and worked. -
A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement
A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics Table of Contents Dating Shakespeare’s Plays 3 Life in Shakespeare’s England 4 Elizabethan Theatre 8 Working in Elizabethan England 14 This Sceptered Isle 16 One Big Happy Family Tree 20 Sir John Falstaff and Tavern Culture 21 Battle of the Henries 24 Playing Nine Men’s Morris 30 FUNDING FOR A NOISE WITHIN’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IS PROVIDED IN paRT BY: The Ahmanson Foundation, Alliance for the Advancement of Arts Education, Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich, Employees Community Fund of Boeing California, The Capital Group Companies, Citigroup Foundation, Disney Worldwide Outreach, Doukas Family Foundation, Ellingsen Family Foundation, The Herb Alpert Foundation, The Green Foundation, Kiwanis Club of Glendale, Lockheed Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County Arts Commission, B.C. McCabe Foundation, Metropolitan Associates, National Endowment for the Arts, The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, The Steinmetz Foundation, Dwight Stuart Youth Foundation, Waterman Foundation, Zeigler Family Foundation. 2 A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement Dating Shakespeare’s Plays Establishing an exact date for the Plays of Shakespeare. She theorized that authorship of Shakespeare’s plays is a very Shakespeare (a “stupid, ignorant, third- difficult task. It is impossible to pin down rate play actor”) could not have written the exact order, because there are no the plays attributed to him. The Victorians records giving details of the first production. were suspicious that a middle-class actor Many of the plays were performed years could ever be England’s greatest poet as before they were first published. -
Diretto Da Craig Gillespie Cast Emma Stone Emma Thompson Joel
Diretto da Craig Gillespie Cast Emma Stone Emma Thompson Joel Fry Paul Walter Hauser Emily Beecham Kirby Howell-Baptiste Mark Strong Sceneggiatura di Dana Fox e Tony McNamara Soggetto di Aline Brosh McKenna e Kelly Marcel & Steve Zissis Prodotto da Andrew Gunn, Marc Platt, Kristin Burr, p.g.a. Produttori esecutivi Emma Stone, Michelle Wright, Jared LeBoff, Glenn Close Direttore della fotografia Nicolas Karakatsanis Scenografie di Fiona Crombie Montaggio di Tatiana S. Riegel Costumi di Jenny Beavan Hair and Makeup Design di Nadia Stacey Visual Effects Supervisor Max Wood Colonna Sonora Originale di Nicholas Britell Music Supervisor Susan Jacobs Set Decorator Alice Fellton Social Network https://www.facebook.com/WaltDisneyStudiosIT/ https://www.instagram.com/waltdisneystudiosit/ https://twitter.com/disneystudiosit https://www.youtube.com/user/WaltDisneyStudiosIT Hashtag #Crudelia 1 NOTE DI PRODUZIONE La vincitrice dell'Academy Award® Emma Stone (La La Land) è la protagonista del nuovo film Disney live action Crudelia, che racconta gli esordi ribelli di una delle antagoniste più celebri, e alla moda, del mondo del cinema: la leggendaria Cruella de Vil (Crudelia De Mon). Ambientato durante la rivoluzione punk rock nella Londra degli anni Settanta, Crudelia segue le vicende di una giovane truffatrice di nome Estella, una ragazza intelligente e creativa determinata a farsi un nome con le sue creazioni. Fa amicizia con una coppia di giovani ladri che apprezzano la sua inclinazione alla cattiveria e insieme riescono a costruirsi una vita per le strade di Londra. Un giorno, il talento di Estella per la moda cattura l'attenzione della Baronessa von Hellman, una leggenda della moda incredibilmente chic e terribilmente raffinata, interpretata dall'attrice due volte premio Oscar® Emma Thompson (Casa Howard, Ragione e Sentimento). -
Romeo and Juliet
Study Guide Romeo and Juliet A Tragedy has 4 Elements Tragic Hero Supernatural Element born Hero has a fatal FLAW Hero’s FATE leads to A mystical, mysterious, Hero is Noble born High downfall or death or unnatural element class occurs during the Influences society Tragic Hero’s life Guide Romeo and Juliet Romeo is a Tragic Hero Romeo Romeo’s FLAW Supernatural is Element Noble Born FATE causes Romeo to NEVER receive the note from Friar Laurence Potion born Romeo is Impulsive mysterious unnatural potion Romeo is born to a Romeo is impulsive … It is FATE that causes Juliet has taken a noble high class family this FLAW causes him to Romeo to NEVER mysterious potion that and is the hero of the make quick decisions receive the note from makes her look dead. play. without thinking. Friar Laurence telling Romeo kills himself him that Juliet plans to because he thinks Juliet FAKE her death. is dead, but she is FAKING death. J. Haugh 2014 X Drive/ English/ Romeo Juliet/ Study Guide Romeo and Juliet 1 Problems or Complications for Juliet Not a Problem of Complication for Juliet There is an ongoing feud between Juliet is NOT in love with Paris so this Capulet and Montague families is not a problem or complication Lady Capulet (Juliet’s mom) wants her to marry Paris Tybalt wants to fight Romeo to the death The feud between the Capulet and Montague Families Obstacles for Romeo Lady Capulet wants Juliet to marry Paris and Juliet Comic Relief happens when a writer puts humor into a serious situation to break the tension Juliet’s Nurse provides COMIC RELIEF in a serious situation J. -
“Revenge in Shakespeare's Plays”
“REVENGE IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS” “OTHELLO” – LECTURE/CLASS WRITTEN: 1603-1604…. although some critics place the date somewhat earlier in 1601- 1602 mainly on the basis of some “echoes” of the play in the 1603 “bad” quarto of “Hamlet”. AGE: 39-40 Years Old (B.1564-D.1616) CHRONO: Four years after “Hamlet”; first in the consecutive series of tragedies followed by “King Lear”, “Macbeth” then “Antony and Cleopatra”. GENRE: “The Great Tragedies” SOURCES: An Italian tale in the collection “Gli Hecatommithi” (1565) of Giovanni Battista Giraldi (writing under the name Cinthio) from which Shakespeare also drew for the plot of “Measure for Measure”. John Pory’s 1600 translation of John Leo’s “A Geographical History of Africa”; Philemon Holland’s 1601 translation of Pliny’s “History of the World”; and Lewis Lewkenor’s 1599 “The Commonwealth and Government of Venice” mainly translated from a Latin text by Cardinal Contarini. STRUCTURE: “More a domestic tragedy than ‘Hamlet’, ‘Lear’ or ‘Macbeth’ concentrating on the destruction of Othello’s marriage and his murder of his wife rather than on affairs of state and the deaths of kings”. SUCCESS: The tragedy met with high success both at its initial Globe staging and well beyond mainly because of its exotic setting (Venice then Cypress), the “foregrounding of issues of race, gender and sexuality”, and the powerhouse performance of Richard Burbage, the most famous actor in Shakespeare’s company. HIGHLIGHT: Performed at the Banqueting House at Whitehall before King James I on 1 November 1604. AFTER: The play has been performed steadily since 1604; for a production in 1660 the actress Margaret Hughes as Desdemona “could have been the first professional actress on the English stage”. -
This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Park-Finch, Heebon Title: Hypertextuality and polyphony in Tom Stoppard's stage plays General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Hypertextuality and Polyphony in Tom Stoppard's Stage Plays Heebon Park-Finch A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in -
3. Groundhog Day (1993) 4. Airplane! (1980) 5. Tootsie
1. ANNIE HALL (1977) 11. THIS IS SPINAL Tap (1984) Written by Woody Allen and Marshall Brickman Written by Christopher Guest & Michael McKean & Rob Reiner & Harry Shearer 2. SOME LIKE IT HOT (1959) Screenplay by Billy Wilder & I.A.L. Diamond, Based on the 12. THE PRODUCERS (1967) German film Fanfare of Love by Robert Thoeren and M. Logan Written by Mel Brooks 3. GROUNDHOG DaY (1993) 13. THE BIG LEBOWSKI (1998) Screenplay by Danny Rubin and Harold Ramis, Written by Ethan Coen & Joel Coen Story by Danny Rubin 14. GHOSTBUSTERS (1984) 4. AIRplaNE! (1980) Written by Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis Written by James Abrahams & David Zucker & Jerry Zucker 15. WHEN HARRY MET SALLY... (1989) 5. TOOTSIE (1982) Written by Nora Ephron Screenplay by Larry Gelbart and Murray Schisgal, Story by Don McGuire and Larry Gelbart 16. BRIDESMAIDS (2011) Written by Annie Mumolo & Kristen Wiig 6. YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN (1974) Screenplay by Gene Wilder and Mel Brooks, Screen Story by 17. DUCK SOUP (1933) Gene Wilder and Mel Brooks, Based on Characters in the Novel Story by Bert Kalmar and Harry Ruby, Additional Dialogue by Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley Arthur Sheekman and Nat Perrin 7. DR. STRANGELOVE OR: HOW I LEARNED TO STOP 18. There’s SOMETHING ABOUT MARY (1998) WORRYING AND LOVE THE BOMB (1964) Screenplay by John J. Strauss & Ed Decter and Peter Farrelly & Screenplay by Stanley Kubrick and Peter George and Bobby Farrelly, Story by Ed Decter & John J. Strauss Terry Southern 19. THE JERK (1979) 8. BlaZING SADDLES (1974) Screenplay by Steve Martin, Carl Gottlieb, Michael Elias, Screenplay by Mel Brooks, Norman Steinberg Story by Steve Martin & Carl Gottlieb Andrew Bergman, Richard Pryor, Alan Uger, Story by Andrew Bergman 20.