DOCSLIB.ORG

Uncommon Mmon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uncommon Mmon pbcRRD 7/26/02 10:54 AM Page 1 Uncommon Ground Architecture, Technology, and Topography David Leatherbarrow Although both are central to architecture, siting and construction are often treated as separate domains. In Uncommon Ground, David Leatherbarrow illuminates their relationship, focusing on the years between 1930 and 1960, when utopian ideas about the role of technology in building gave way to an awareness of its disruptive impact on cities and culture. He examines the work of three architects: Richard Neutra, Antonin Raymond, and Aris Konstantinidis, who practiced in the United States, Japan, and Greece respectively. UNCOMMON Leatherbarrow rejects the assumption that buildings of the modern peri- od, particularly those that used the latest technology, were designed with- out regard to their surroundings. Although the prefabricated elements used in the buildings were designed independent of siting considerations, archi- tects used these elements to modulate the environment. Leatherbarrow shows how the role of walls, the traditional element of architectural defin- ition and platform partition, became less significant than that of the plat- forms themselves—the floors, ceilings, and intermediate levels. Arguing that the boundary between inside and outside was radically redefined, Leatherbarrow challenges cherished notions about the autonomy of the architectural object and about regional coherence. UNCOMMON GROUND UNCOMMON GROUND GROUND David Leatherbarrow is Professor of Architecture and Chairman of the Graduate Group in Architecture at the University of Pennsylvania. He is ARCHITECTURE, TECHNOLOGY, AND TOPOGRAPHY the coauthor of Surface Architecture (MIT Press, 2002) and On Weathering (MIT Press, 1993). LEATHERBARROW “The interwoven roles of site, technology, and topography in the art of architecture are examined in this fascinating look at the structures in which we live and work.” —Forecast “[Uncommon Ground] corrects the distorted view that modern architects The MIT Press were insensitive to the physical context of their buildings.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology —Herbert Muschamp, New York Times DAVID LEATHERBARROW Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 http://mitpress.mit.edu 0-262-62161-4 ,!7IA2G2-gcbgbi!:t;K;k;K;k UNCOMMON GROUND UNCOMMON GROUND ARCHITECTURE, TECHNOLOGY, AND TOPOGRAPHY DAVID LEATHERBARROW THE MIT PRESS CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS LONDON, ENGLAND © 2000 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Garamond 3 by Graphic Composition, Inc. and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Leatherbarrow, David. Uncommon ground : architecture, technology, and topography / David Leatherbarrow. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-12230-8 (hc. : alk. paper) 1. Building sites—Planning. 2. Architecture and technology. 3. Architecture— Environmental aspects. 4. Neutra, Richard Joseph, 1892–1970—Criticism and interpreta- tion. 5. Raymond, Antonin, 1888–—Criticism and interpretation. 6. Ko¯nstantinide¯s, Are¯s, 1913–—Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. NA2540.5´ .L433 2000 720—dc21 00-038005 CONTENTS PREFACE vi ONE INTRODUCTION: ARCHITECTURE AND ITS HORIZONS 2 TWO BUILDING LEVELS 25 THREE BACK TO FRONT, OR ABOUT FACE 71 FOUR THE TOPOGRAPHICAL HORIZON OF DWELLING EQUIPMENT 119 FIVE IN AND OUTSIDE OF ARCHITECTURE 170 SIX THE PLAY OF ARTICULATION 213 SEVEN CONCLUSION 269 NOTES 285 INDEX 294 PREFACE In this book I consider two topics that are central to architectural work: the construction and siting of buildings. Few, I suspect, would doubt their cen- trality, even necessity; it is virtually impossible to imagine an architectural setting that is neither built nor located somewhere. While plainly important, these topics are not, however, plainly understood when considered together; in design and discourse they are normally treated as globally different areas of thought and responsibility. Irretrievably lost in this division are the continu- ities and conflicts that define every setting’s theme and purpose. Two previous books have prompted this one. The first, On Weathering, examined the relationship between the building and its natural context, the context in which the building completes itself over time, by design and unexpectedly. The second book, on architectural cladding, studies the impact of modern construction technology on the building’s surfaces, questioning whether production determines representation. Standing between these two, the study presented here considers the relationships between the building’s context and construction; my thesis is that place and production, or topogra- phy and technology, are in conflict in late modern architecture, because while the technical objects incorporated into buildings are conceived independently of territorial considerations, constructed buildings never are. Thus a paradox and a question: does global technology destroy topographical coherence and cultural continuity? The answer would seem to be yes if one holds that cul- tures locate themselves in settlements characterized by permanence and speci- ficity — traditional cities — for the installation of elements with no territorial obligations always disrupts traditional patterns. Because stable settlements are the framework of culture, and culture of patterns of life, continuity must be reconsidered in a time when global technology cannot be avoided. Present concerns about construction and siting have historical ante- cedents and geographical variation. In this book I study the middle decades of this century, roughly from 1930 to 1960. During this period the early vi PREFACE twentieth-century utopian and ideological advocacy of industrialized build- ing gave way to the struggle for its realization, a struggle that led to serious reflection on the whole enterprise, precisely because of the difficulty of its re- alization and its disruptive impact on cities and culture. This study is also limited geographically, but not to one region. While the problems being ad- dressed are faced to different degrees throughout the world, I focus on three cultural contexts only, the United States, Japan, and Greece: three that have had distinct settlement patterns and labor traditions, three that have mod- ernized themselves differently. Contextual differences help me formulate the range and nature of responses to the issues facing construction and location in an age dominated by technological modalities of thought. To study the relationships between building and siting in these loca- tions I have focused on the work of three architect-authors: Richard Neutra, Antonin Raymond, and Aris Konstantinidis, who practiced in the United States, Japan, and Greece respectively. These three, who are not generally ranked as heroic figures in histories of the modern movement, have been se- lected for two reasons: the quality and concerns of their built and written work, and the fact that their concerns were shared by others who practiced at the same time in the same regions, others who acknowledged the exigencies of industrial building while accepting the constraints and opportunities of the places in which they worked. While distinct, the three are thus represen- tative. Each of them has been variously studied in existing scholarship. On Neutra, by far the most widely known of the three, there exist a few mono- graphs, including the authoritative book by Thomas Hines, and many ar- ticles. Antonin Raymond, who worked in partnership with Noémi Raymond, has been the subject of just a few papers, journals, and a Ph.D. dissertation. Konstantinidis has been studied even less, mostly in articles by Kenneth Frampton and Sokratis Georgiadis. Existing studies have not considered my question: how the conflict between technology and topography in late mod- ern architecture was understood and addressed. As I studied the buildings and writings of these architects, and this period generally, I observed important changes in the ways buildings were designed and considered. Despite what has been frequently said about the vii PREFACE objectlike character of modern buildings, these were carefully attuned to their locations, but not in traditional ways, nor without consequences for the build- ing itself. The book’s chapters describe these consequences. The first chapter after the introduction shows that walls, the traditional element of archi- tectural definition and platform compartition, came to have less a role in de- fining settings than the platforms themselves, the floors, ceilings, and intermediate levels. This use of the building’s levels meant that architectural boundaries became akin to other (and unbuilt) topographical modulations. Platform thinking thus inaugurated field understanding. Chapter 3 shows that in this period architectural frontality came to be replaced by the build- ing’s four-sided extension into the surrounding milieu, putting in place of the front the kind of configuration that is characteristic of the back, substituting for the building’s pictorial aspect a “practical” spatiality. I distinguish the space of dispersed fragments from the recessive substrate that occasions their emergence. The fourth chapter reverses the outward movement described in the third; I consider the interior furnishings and equipment of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bringing the Vernacular Into Modernism
    Scuola Italiana di Studi École Française BY CO-HOSTED sull’Asia Orientale d’Extrême-Orient ISEAS EFEO Friday, December 11th, 18:00h Yola Gloaguen SPEAKER Antonin Raymond’s career allows us to explore the dy- namics and implications of the development of European Bringing and American architectural modernism in a non-Western context. The Czech-born American architect arrived in Japan on the eve of 1920 to assist Frank Lloyd Wright with building the new Imperial Hotel in Tokyo. However, the Vernacular Raymond soon opened his own oce in the capital and became one of the pioneers of modern architecture in Japan. The human and technical challenges taken on by into Modernism Raymond included responding to an increasing demand for the design of villas suited to the Western and Japanese lifestyles of Tokyo’s international elites. This was reected in the spatial design and construction of these new types Architect of houses. The talk will highlight various examples of prewar and postwar residential works, with a focus on how Raymond and his team developed an approach to Antonin Raymond design based on the appropriation and adaptation of selected elements of the Japanese vernacular into the Western modernist idiom, which itself had to be reevalu- in Interwar Japan ated in the particular context of Japan. This approach to Raymond’s work provides a means to reassess the usual binaries of Western inuence and Japanese adaptation through the medium of architecture. Yola Gloaguen is a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre de recherche sur les civilisations de l’Asie orientale–CRCAO, Paris. After receiving her degree in architecture from Paris La Villette School of Architecture, she became a doctoral student at Kyoto University and studied modern architectural history in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Maverick Impossible-James Rose and the Modern American Garden
    Maverick Impossible-James Rose and the Modern American Garden. Dean Cardasis, Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture, University of Massachusetts (Amherst) “To see the universe within a place is to see a garden; approach to American garden design. to see it so is to have a garden; Rose was a rugged individualist who explored the not to prevent its happening is to build a garden.” universal through the personal. Both his incisive James Rose, Modern American Gardens. writings and his exquisite gardens evidence the vitality of an approach to garden making (and life) as James Rose was one of the leaders of the modern an adventure within the great cosmic joke. He movement in American garden design. I write this disapproved of preconceiving design or employing advisedly because James “ the-maverick-impossible” any formulaic method, and favored direct Rose would be the first to disclaim it. “I’m no spontaneous improvisation with nature. Unlike fellow missionary,” he often exclaimed, “I do what pleases modern rebels and friends, Dan Kiley and Garrett me!”1 Nevertheless, Rose, through his experimental Eckbo, Rose devoted his life to exploring the private built works, his imaginative creative writing, and his garden as a place of self-discovery. Because of the generally subversive life-style provides perhaps the contemplative nature of his gardens, his work has clearest image of what may be termed a truly modern sometimes been mislabeled Japanesebut nothing made Rose madder than to suggest he did Japanese gardens. In fact, in response to a query from one prospective client as to whether he could do a Japanese garden for her, Rose replied, “Of course, whereabouts in Japan do you live?”2 This kind of response to what he would call his clients’ “mind fixes” was characteristic of James Rose.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 26, No. 3 (Fall/Winter 2000/01)
    Fall/Winter 20002001 Journal of the Integral Yoga of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother Vol. 26, no. 3 An interview with Udar Pinto Travels with Swami Ananta: Greece The triple time vision Sunlit crystal, sunlit path Eye contact with God Supermarket yoga best sellers Fall/Winter 20002001 Collaboration 1 About the artists and TTTababable of contents photographers in this issue Preeti Bhatt ([email protected]) Collaboration, vol. 26, no. 3: Fall/Winter 20002001 works in a technical marketing firm in Silicon Val- Beginning ley. She has loved art since her childhood and does sketches and oil painting in her spare time. Her Cells of a feather hobbies include reading, watching movies and Mother on how to have better meetings .............................. the Mother 4 cartoons, and volunteering her time to help others. Catherine Blackburn (c.blackburn@ sympatico.ca.) is an artist, teacher, and member of New letters on yoga the Sri Aurobindo Spiritual Centre of Toronto. She is also a board member of AVI Canada. Welcome to our new subscribers ............................................. Marta Belén 4 Wayne Bloomquist (calcutta98@hotmail. From our readers ......................................... Joseph Kent, Margaret Phanes, com) has visited the Sri Aurobindo Ashram many ..................................................... Alice Webb, Bob Zwicker, B.Y. 5 times and was organizer of the 1995 conference on Questions ............................................................................. Bruce Forsythe 5 cellular transformation in Berkeley, California. Jim Foreman ([email protected]) is an artist in Lafayette, Colorado who believes hu- Current affairs manity is facing a future of unprecedented change, challenge, and opportunity. His work is based on AUM 2001 to be held near San Francisco .................................................... 6 themes from the spiritual teaching Steps to CIF schedules 50th anniversary talks ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Living Creative Spirit
    The Great Living Creative Spirit Frank LLoyd Wright s legacy in japan Soib ' SS NoV. ii– . Join the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy for a specially curated tour highlighting modern and contemporary architecture FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT by Wright, Arata Endo, Antonin Raymond, Le Corbusier, Tadao BUILDING CONSERVANCY Ando, Kenzo Tange, Toyo Ito, Kengo Kuma and many more. Day one Sunday, Nov. 11 Arrive in Tokyo and check in at the Imperial Hotel (flights and hotel transfer not included). In the early evening, meet the rest of the group (limited to 27) for a welcome dinner at the historic For- MORI eign Correspondents‘ Club of Japan and a viewing of the Rafael Viñoly-designed Tokyo International Forum. Later, take an optional OICHI evening walking tour of Ginza, the famous upscale shopping and © K entertainment district where the traditional and modern meet. HOTO Overnight: Imperial Hotel, Tokyo / Meals: Dinner P Day TWO Monday, Nov. 12 The first full day begins with a tour of the 1970 Imperial Hotel, which includes the Old Imperial Bar, outfitted with relics of Wright’s demolished Imperial Hotel (1923-67). Then journey to Meguro St. Anselm’s Church, designed by Antonin Raymond, and have lunch at Meguro Gajoen, a lavish design furnished with artwork from its 1928 origins. Continue with a special visit to the private home Japanese modernist Kunio Maekawa built for himself in 1974, then a walking tour of Omotesando (a broad avenue lined with flagship designs by the likes of SANAA, Toyo Ito, Herzog & de Meuron, Kengo Kuma, Tadao Ando and Kenzo Tange). After a visit to the 21_21 Design Sight museum and gallery, designed by Tadao Ando, we finish the day with a view from the 52nd-floor observation deck at Mori Tower in Roppongi Hills, designed by Kohn Pedersen Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaj Franck Finnish, 1911–1989
    Overstuffed ‘Gorilla’ Armchair 1941 Installation photograph from Organic Design in Home Furnishings exhibition, designed by Eliot Noyes Photograph by Samuel Gottscho The Museum of Modern Art Archives, New York This tableau from 1941 represented the tradition of “horrible” design against which MoMA curators prepared to crusade. It shows the dismembered carcass of an old-fashioned, overstuffed armchair behind bars, against the backdrop of an enormous gorilla. Using zoological terms, the accompanying label describes the domineering, ungainly monstrosity of the armchair, and the jungle like clutter of its habitat: “Cathedra gargantua, genus americanus. Weight when fully matured, 60 pounds. Habitat, the American Home. Devours little children, pencils, small change, fountain pens, bracelets, clips, earrings, scissors, hairpins, and other small flora and fauna of the domestic jungle. Is far from extinct.” Charles Eames This armchair was among the winning American, 1907–1978 furniture designs of MoMA’s Organic Eero Saarinen Design competition that Haskelite put into American, born Finland. 1910–1961 production. The chair was created to give Marli Ehrman the sitter maximum support, while avoiding American, born Germany. 1904–1982 heavy construction and cumbersome upholstery. Its plywood frame was carefully High-back armchair molded to provide continuous contact 1940 with the body, and was covered with a thin Molded wood shell, foam rubber, rubber pad, as well as woven fabric upholstery, and wood legs designed by Ehrman, who had emigrated in 1938 from Germany to head the weaving Manufactured by Heywood-Wakefield Co., workshop at the Chicago School of Design. Gardner, MA Purchase Fund Noémi Raymond These prizewinning textiles were designed American, born France.
    [Show full text]
  • Title TOWARDS a DEFINITION of ANTONIN RAYMOND's
    TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ANTONIN RAYMOND'S "ARCHITECTURAL IDENTITY" : A STUDY BASED ON Title THE ARCHITECT'S WAY OF THINKING AND WAY OF DESIGN( Dissertation_全文 ) Author(s) GLOAGUEN, Yola Citation 京都大学 Issue Date 2008-03-24 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k13809 Right Type Thesis or Dissertation Textversion author Kyoto University TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ANTONIN RAYMOND’S “ARCHITECTURAL IDENTITY” -A STUDY BASED ON THE ARCHITECT’S WAY OF THINKING AND WAY OF DESIGN- アントニン・レーモンドの建築的アイデンティティの解読 －建築家の思考方法と設計方法の研究－ February 2008 YOLA GLOAGUEN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the Japanese Ministry of Education 文部科 学省, and the Shadan-hōjin Kenchiku-gyō Kyōkai 社団法人建築業協会, for granting me the scholarships that allowed me to complete my doctor course at Kyoto University. I would like to thank Professor Takamatsu 高松 伸 and Takeyama 竹山 聖 of Kyoto University for accepting me in their laboratories, where I was able to carry out my research on Antonin Raymond. I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Monnai 門内 輝行 of Kyoto University for his moral and technical support, and to Professor Maeda 前田 忠直 for his advice and for accepting to be part of my jury. I would like to thank Raymond’s Architectural Design Office in Tokyo, for giving me access to their archives, in which I was able to find the invaluable material I needed for the analysis of Raymond’s residential designs. I would like to thank more particularly Matano Norisuke 的埜 教介 who provided precious assistance in the locating of the drawings that were relevant to my research and also for dealing with the practical matters of the drawings reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol22 3 66 73.Pdf (2.926Mb)
    Bishop: A Microhistorical Study ofthe Church of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupre One of the interesting questions raised by the Italian historians engaged in the practice of microhistory concerns the status of archival documents in the construction of a historical explanation.1 At the risk of oversimplifying, one can say that microhistory prefers to see documents as symptoms or clues to be interpreted rather than data to be collected. The search for data is a search for true and positive information, and it is believed that data can be extracted from documents as minerals are extracted from ore. Clues, on the other hand, do not consist of abstract pieces of information supporting inductive reasoning; they remain on the level of the particular, as when we infer the existence of a fire from the smell of smoke. Instead of going from the general to the particular, as in deduction, or from the particular to the general, as in induction, the interpretation of clues goes from the particular to the particular, and constitutes what logicians have called abduction. According to Carlo Ginzburg, the earliest human intellectual act was carried out by a hunter crouching in the mud, examining the footprints of some animal. Footprints are, for the hunter, clues to the passage of a specific animal. They display a certain degree of freshness, a specific direction, a certain depth, and a certain distance from one another. However, all these concrete features, referring to a single event, need to be discarded when biologists search for what is generic and typical about those footprints in order to determine which species live in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Nature of Modernity
    The Newsletter | No.65 | Autumn 2013 18 | The Review The international nature of modernity This fi ne contribution to the history of Japanese architecture provides a detailed analysis of the work of three infl uential architects of the interwar period. The book, however, achieves more than this: it presents the reader with a broad framework for understanding the nature of the cultural and intellectual links that fl owed between Japan and the West at the apex of the imperial era. Arguably, this was the high point of what is generally defi ned as ‘modernity’, and the theoretical premises upon which author, Ken Tadashi Oshima, bases his discussion certainly has relevance beyond the arena of Japanese architecture. Indeed, Oshima places the question of the international nature of modernity at the very centre of this book in a way that enhances his forensic detailing of uniquely Japanese response to the intellectual currents in these decades. Natsuko Akagawa Reviewed publication: Modernist agenda Oshima, K.T. 2010. This account then, while focusing on the lives, ideas and International Architecture the work of three architects, is certainly not a set of discrete in Interwar Japan: Constructing biographies. From their lives, ideas and work Oshima kokusai kenchiku ‘constructs’ (a term he sees as a metaphor for his approach Seattle: Washington University to research and writing) a broad discussion on the dynamics Press, ISBN: 9780295989440 of a historical period in Japanese architecture. The book is divided into four chapters, which gradually lead the reader into the heart of kokusai kenchiku. The fi rst chapter establishes a concise historical account of the origins and early development of modern architecture in Japan, specifi cally linking this to the nation building project of the WHAT OSHIMA EMPHASISES HERE is that the ‘international- Meiji Restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonin Raymond, an Architectural Journey
    ”Antonin Raymond, an Architectural Journey. From Bohemia to Japan in the Early 20th Century” Yola Gloaguen To cite this version: Yola Gloaguen. ”Antonin Raymond, an Architectural Journey. From Bohemia to Japan in the Early 20th Century”. The Friends of Czech Heritage, 2017, 16, Winter 2016/17, pp.9-13. hal-02906103 HAL Id: hal-02906103 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02906103 Submitted on 24 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Friends of Czech Heritage Newsletter Issue 16 - Winter 2016/17 Antonin Raymond, an Architectural Journey, see page 10 Clockwise from left: - Antonin Raymond, self-portrait, 1910. Antonin Raymond archives, Karuizawa. Courtesy of Kitazawa Koichi. - Adachi house, Karuizawa, 1966. Antonin Raymond archives, Karuizawa. Photo: Yola Gloaguen, 2012. - Jan Letzel (1880-1925) was also from Bohemia and designed the Hiroshima Prefectural Industrial Promotion Hall (1915), which now stands as the A-Bomb Dome, a landmark of the city’s Peace Memorial. © Dean S. Pemberton. 9 The Friends of Czech Heritage Newsletter Issue 16 - Winter 2016/17 Antonin Raymond, the peripheral region of Prague. His father, Alois an Architectural Journey Reimann was a Jew of German descent and his mother Růžena Tausig, a Catholic.
    [Show full text]
  • An Intellectual Biography of Adriano Olivetti Marco Maffioletti
    The ideal enterprise between factory and community : an intellectual biography of Adriano Olivetti Marco Maffioletti To cite this version: Marco Maffioletti. The ideal enterprise between factory and community : an intellectual biography of Adriano Olivetti. Architecture, space management. Université de Grenoble; Università degli studi (Torino, Italia), 2013. Italian. NNT : 2013GRENL018. tel-01679331 HAL Id: tel-01679331 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01679331 Submitted on 9 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 4(N3% 0≤ • ≤ ¨• ≤°§• §• $/ 4%52 $% , 5.)6%23)4O $% '2 %. /" ,% ≤°≤• §°≥ ¨• £°§≤• §• £•¨¨• •≤• ¨ 5©•≤≥© §• '≤• ¨• • ¨ 5©•≤≥© §•¨© 3§© §© 4 ≤© 3£ °¨ O§•≥ ) °¨© •• ≥ !≤≤– ≥≤©•¨ ¨• ™° •≤ °! 0≤œ≥•• °≤ -°≤£ -! "" )/,%44) 4#$≥• § ≤ • °≤ "°#© ,%6) • %$ .% 00) ≤°≤• ° ≥• §•≥ ,°≤° ≤•≥ '≤ &• § %§•≥ • §• 2•£'•≤£'• ≥≤ ¨° ¨≤• ) °¨© •• ('%2 )) §• ¨5 •≤≥ 3• #°¨'≤•¨•( 3•) • •*& ≤°•©≥©£° §•¨ §©&°≤©*• §© 3§© 3 ≤©£© §•¨¨5 •≤≥ * §• ¨ 3§ 4≤ • §°≥ ¨•≥ O£¨•≥ ,£≤°¨•≥ O£¨• ,£≤°¨• ,°+•≥, ,©-≤°≤• • 3£©•£•≥ '*°©•≥ §• ¨5 •≤≥ 3• #°¨'≤•¨•
    [Show full text]
  • This Historic Context Report Is Intended To
    MONTANA POST-WORLD WAR II ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY AND INVENTORY A Preserve America project Prepared for the Montana State Historic Preservation Office Helena, MT Prepared by Diana J. Painter, PhD Painter Preservation & Planning Spokane, WA MONTANA POST-WORLD WAR II ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY AND INVENTORY HISTORIC CONTEXT AND SURVEY REPORT ________________________________________ A Preserve America project ________________________________ Prepared for the Montana State Historic Preservation Office Montana Historical Society Helena, MT Prepared by Diana J. Painter, PhD Painter Preservation & Planning Spokane, WA December 2010 MONTANA POST-WORLD WAR II ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY AND INVENTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................. iii Summary and Recommendations ................................................................. 1 I. Introduction ...................................................................................... 5 Purpose of Survey and Survey Report Research Design Research and Field Methods Historical Themes In this Document Evaluator Qualifications 2. Regulatory Context ............................................................................. 9 Criteria for Evaluation Aspects of Integrity Historic Contexts Future Surveys 3. Historic Context ................................................................................ 13 Overview The Post-World War I Era The Great Depression and the New Deal World War II The Cold War Post-War Growth 4. Architectural
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism Architects Junzo Yoshimura (1908-1997)
    Development of Architectural Documentation in Japan: Accelerated by DOCOMOMO’s Activities Mari Nakahara, Ph.D. Prologue Europe and America have seen real growth in activity and value placed on preserving buildings and on archiving of architectural materials. On the other hand, while Japan has maintained a strong tradition of preserving its cultural legacies, architecture and related documentation was not given such priority, as evidenced by the lack of even a single architectural archive in Japan until recently. Although this does not imply that there was no architectural documentation in Japan, it does show that they had been poorly preserved and were rarely accessible. This paper is to report the development of architectural documentation in Japan, which especially has been accelerated by the activities of DOCOMOMO since its working group in Japan was formed in 1998 to establish its chapter. Trend towards Archiving of Architectural Documents in Japan To begin, let’s look back at the 1980s when Japan first began to pay attention to the maintenance of architectural documents. In 1984, a committee was set up at the Architectural Institute of Japan to consider the establishment of the first architectural museum in Japan. They gathered information from architectural museums, centers, archives, and libraries outside of Japan to construct the outline of a unique architectural museum and archive. In 1994, they reported their ten-year activities, proposed details of an ideal architectural museum and archive, and the committee dissolved. Any tangible follow-through on their report was made in the next five to six years. This could be attributed in part to the recession in Japan, partly to their unrealistic proposal, or partly to the lack of a head organizer for this project.
    [Show full text]