DOCSLIB.ORG

The Concretia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Concretia The Concretia North America’s First Self-Powered Concrete Ship By Sonny Moran es, concrete can float, but when it sinks – it sinks fast! For this reason, sailors who crewed on concrete ships often referred to them as “floating tombstones.” Y Ships made of concrete are built of steel and ferrocement (reinforced concrete) instead of just steel or wood. Ferrocement is made by mixing cement and sand together, then applying it into a tapestry of wired-together rebar and wire mesh to form a hull. Concrete construction makes shipbuilding cheaper, but the ship’s operation is more costly. Concrete ships require a thick hull, which allows less space for cargo, but ferrocement is strong, durable, waterproof, prevents corrosion, and is fireproof up to 750 degrees celsius for up to 48 hours. The Concretia and Its Crew North America’s first self-propelled ship made of concrete, the Canadian Government Ship (CGS) Concretia, was designed and built between 1908 and 1917 by Charles Michael Morseen, president of Atlas Construction Co. Ltd. of Montreal, Quebec, and Professor E. Brown, Vice Dean of Applied Mechanics and Hydraulics at McGill University. The Concretia. – Sonny Moran photo. The Concretia: North America’s First Self-Powered Concrete Ship • 1 It was a World War I experimental vessel built of concrete due to a shortage of wood and steel in Canada. The hull was 18 inches thick on the sides, 24 inches thick at the keel, and 132 feet long. The Concretia steamed through the waters of the mighty St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario as a lighthouse and buoy supply vessel from 1920 to 1931. This Department of Marine and Fisheries vessel had a 14-member crew whose duties fluctuated depending on the task at hand. In the 1920s, pay rates and working conditions on Government of Canada ships were determined at a meeting of various vessel-operating department officials, held each spring prior to the navigation season. Deck officers and engineers were paid based on the size of their ship and engines, as well as the work their vessels were intended to conduct. For example, in 1926, the captain of the Concretia earned $160 a month during navigation season. The first mate, as second- in-command, received $125 a month. Setting wages for the Concretia’s crew was involved, balancing prudent expenditures from the public purse with the desired pay of the crew. The End of the Concretia The Concretia finished her government service career in 1933. Eventually, the ship was scuttled in Kingston, Ontario, to form a wharf, but not before the engines were removed and placed into a ship called the Salvage Queen, owned by the Canadian Dredge and Dock Co. The concrete hull was purchased in 1978 by three Canadian adventurers who wanted to use the massive ship as their means to sail the warm waters of the Mediterranean Sea as well as the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. They refloated the Concretia in 1979, renamed it the Onaygorah (a Cataraqui Aboriginal word meaning “the one which keeps the history”), and towed it to the La Salle Causeway dock, near Lake Ontario, for refitting. It was very difficult to free the vessel from the Kingston Harbour bottom. Even the Canadian Forces tried to dislodge the concrete ship, to no avail. Tugboat service operator Harry Gamble of Kingston pumped all the water out of the ship and was finally able to free the historic craft from the mud of Kingston Harbour. Since the hull was made of poured concrete, it remained in great shape. The Concretia: North America’s First Self-Powered Concrete Ship • 2 Onaygorah a) Concretia at berth in Kingston, Ontario. – Image courtesy of former Onaygorah crew member Jeff Irving. The refit Onaygorah boasted 13 working sails totaling 6,000 square-feet on three, 85-foot masts. It is believed the ship became the largest pleasure craft registered in Canada at the time of her refit. The vessel now accommodated 11 double cabins, with more than half of them equal to the size of a stateroom. A dining room, galley kitchen, three washrooms, living room, hot tub, and of course a bridge and engine room rounded out the onboard amenities. The ship was also given a new propeller shaft. The owners spent more than $750,000 for equipment to make Onaygorah ship-shape. The three-masted barquentine sailed out of Kingston in 1981 on a five-year voyage to study marine biology in the warm South Pacific waters around the Island of Fiji. Travel plans included trips through Haiti, the Bahamas, Jamaica and the Yucatan. The Concretia: North America’s First Self-Powered Concrete Ship • 3 Oswego, New York, served as an early port of call on her voyage halfway around the world. While docked in the harbor, the Onaygorah captain had to hire a crane to help crew members dismantle the ship’s three, 85-foot tall masts. The vessel’s route included sailing down the Erie Canal, and her tall masts would not fit underneath some of the bridges that spanned the canal. Where is the Onaygorah today? Did it make it to the South Pacific? Did it become a “floating tombstone?” No one seems to know. The Parmanencia The Concretia had a sister ship, the Parmanencia, also of ferrocement construction, built in North Sydney, Nova Scotia, in 1920. The vessel, owned by W.N. MacDonald of Sydney, Australia, sailed with nine crewmen and weighed 292 tons. On its last voyage the Parmanencia carried 188 tons of herring as it left the Island of Saint- Pierre, south of Newfoundland, heading for Boston. A strong wind out of the southwest buffeted the ship and the wind increased in intensity, swirling into a violent storm. As the storm raged the Parmanencia stayed afloat with great difficulty. The captain turned for shelter along the coast to wait out the storm. The vessel dropped anchor, but the anchor chain snapped and broke. The Parmanencia’s engines were no match for the storm and soon structural cracks appeared on the bridge and in the ferrocement hull. The captain finally ordered the crew to abandon ship. All crew members made it to shore, but the Parmanencia was lost off the Island of Saint-Pierre. Concrete Ships Today Surviving concrete ships are no longer in use as ships. When steel and wood became plentiful after the conclusion of World War I, the shipbuilding industry stopped building concrete ships. Their heavy hulls became too expensive to operate because they needed too much fuel to push them through the water. Concrete vessels therefore had little or no salvage value. At least three U.S. concrete ships can still be seen today. The cement tanker Selma was built in 1919 and sailed between Texas and Mexico. Listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places, it lies partially submerged in Galveston Bay, Texas. The Concretia: North America’s First Self-Powered Concrete Ship • 4 The wreck of the cement vessel Atlantus, built by the Liberty Shipbuilding Corp. of Georgia during World War I, rests off the coast of New Jersey, near Cape May Point, where it was grounded in sand. The tanker Palo Alto, built in 1919 at the U.S. Naval Shipyard in Oakland, California, by the San Francisco Shipbuilding Company, serves as an artificial reef for marine life at Seacliff Beach in Aptos, California. About the Author Sonny Moran is a Canadian author based in Ottawa and has been a professional writer since the mid-1980s. Sonny has worked as a communications advisor/coordinator in the private and public sectors and also had a career as a journalist for national and regional publications. He is author of the two popular books Captains of Concrete and Floating Tombstone: The Mysterious Disappearance of North America’s First Self- Propelled Concrete Ship. He spent five years researching Captains of Concrete and is uniquely qualified to write and speak about the CGS Concretia – his great-uncle John Dick was first mate and captain of the vessel for four years. References Appleton, Thomas E. Usque ad mare: A History of the Canadian Coast Guard and Marine Service. Ottawa: Department of Transport, 1968. Broad, William J. Rogue. Giants at Sea. New York Times, July 11, 2006. Irving, Jeff. Former Onaygorah crew member. Interviewed on September 19, 2008. Dick, John. Canadian Armed Forces Personnel File. Ottawa: Library and Archives Canada. Concretia. Original official files. Ottawa: Library and Archives Canada, Department of Marine and Fisheries, 1920-31. The Concretia: North America’s First Self-Powered Concrete Ship • 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilfred Sykes Education Corporation
    Number 302 • summer 2017 PowerT HE M AGAZINE OF E NGINE -P OWERED V ESSELS FRO M T HEShips S T EA M SHI P H IS T ORICAL S OCIE T Y OF A M ERICA ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Messageries Maritimes’ three musketeers 8 Sailing British India An American Classic: to the Persian steamer Gulf 16 Post-war American WILFRED Freighters 28 End of an Era 50 SYKES 36 Thanks to All Who Continue to Support SSHSA July 2016-July 2017 Fleet Admiral – $50,000+ Admiral – $25,000+ Maritime Heritage Grant Program The Dibner Charitable The Family of Helen & Henry Posner, Jr. Trust of Massachusetts The Estate of Mr. Donald Stoltenberg Ambassador – $10,000+ Benefactor ($5,000+) Mr. Thomas C. Ragan Mr. Richard Rabbett Leader ($1,000+) Mr. Douglas Bryan Mr. Don Leavitt Mr. and Mrs. James Shuttleworth CAPT John Cox Mr. H.F. Lenfest Mr. Donn Spear Amica Companies Foundation Mr. Barry Eager Mr. Ralph McCrea Mr. Andy Tyska Mr. Charles Andrews J. Aron Charitable Foundation CAPT and Mrs. James McNamara Mr. Joseph White Mr. Jason Arabian Mr. and Mrs. Christopher Kolb CAPT and Mrs. Roland Parent Mr. Peregrine White Mr. James Berwind Mr. Nicholas Langhart CAPT Dave Pickering Exxon Mobil Foundation CAPT Leif Lindstrom Peabody Essex Museum Sponsor ($250+) Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Ferguson Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Lockhart Mr. Henry Posner III Mr. Ronald Amos Mr. Henry Fuller Jr. Mr. Jeff MacKlin Mr. Dwight Quella Mr. Daniel Blanchard Mr. Walter Giger Jr. Mr. and Mrs. Jack Madden Council of American Maritime Museums Mrs. Kathleen Brekenfeld Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archeology of the Atomic Bomb
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB: A SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF THE SUNKEN FLEET OF OPERATION CROSSROADS AT BIKINI AND KWAJALEIN ATOLL LAGOONS REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Prepared for: The Kili/Bikini/Ejit Local Government Council By: James P. Delgado Daniel J. Lenihan (Principal Investigator) Larry E. Murphy Illustrations by: Larry V. Nordby Jerry L. Livingston Submerged Cultural Resources Unit National Maritime Initiative United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers Number 37 Santa Fe, New Mexico 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS ... LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ......................................... 111 FOREWORD ................................................... vii Secretary of the Interior. Manuel Lujan. Jr . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................... ix CHAPTER ONE: Introduction ........................................ 1 Daniel J. Lenihan Project Mandate and Background .................................. 1 Methodology ............................................... 4 Activities ................................................. 1 CHAPTER TWO: Operation Crossroads .................................. 11 James P. Delgado The Concept of a Naval Test Evolves ............................... 14 Preparing for the Tests ........................................ 18 The AbleTest .............................................. 23 The Baker Test ............................................. 27 Decontamination Efforts .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz Sentinel Columns by Gary Griggs, Director, Institute of Marine Sciences, UC Santa Cruz
    Our Ocean Backyard –– Santa Cruz Sentinel columns by Gary Griggs, Director, Institute of Marine Sciences, UC Santa Cruz. #73 January 29, 2011 Ships of cement The SantaCruzCement taking on a load of dry cement at the former wharf below the cliffs in Davenport opposite the cement plan. Santa Cruz County is probably one of the only places around that has had three large “cement” ships in its coastal history, none of which was made solely of cement. All of the ships dated from the early part of the last century, and each used for very different purposes. One of the natural resources of the Santa Cruz Mountains’ that was exploited early on was limestone, actually marble, a basic raw material for making cement. When the Davenport cement plant was being constructed in 1905, there wasn’t yet a railroad up the north coast, but it wasn’t long until trestles were built across the canyons and tracks were laid. A direct rail connection up the coast to San Francisco was never completed, so cement had to be transported through a longer and more indirect route, south past Watsonville, through Chittenden Pass, and then north to the bay area. An idea was hatched, which seemed like a great solution at the time; transport the cement by ship directly to Stockton where it was to be offloaded. So as only engineers can, a pier was boldly designed and constructed in the early 1930s starting from the sea cliff opposite the cement plant. A pile driver was lowered down the cliff and steel piles were driven into the seafloor.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen Concrete Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., TORRY, Aberdeen, 1918 to 1920
    2018 – v1 Aberdeen Concrete Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., TORRY, Aberdeen, 1918 to 1920. STANLEY BRUCE Aberdeen Concrete Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., Torry, Aberdeen, 1918 to 1920. Stanley Bruce, 2018-v1 Due to the age of the photographs and drawings in this book they are all considered to be out of copyright, however where the photographer, artist or source of the item is known it has been stated directly below it. Cover photograph: Hull of the ‘Cretetree’ as photographed on the Isle of Scalpay, near Ardinashaig, Harris, Western Isles, Scotland, by Marc Calhoun. https://marccalhoun.blogspot.co.uk This book has been published on an entirely non-profit basis, and made available to all online free of charge as a pdf. The aim of the book is to make the history of ships built by the Aberdeen Concrete Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., available to a wider audience. There is much available on the internet, especially on www.aberdeenships.com which gives much more details from many newspapers not stated in this publication. However, what’s currently available is scattered and doesn’t readily give the full picture when looking at the perspective from an individual shipbuilding company. If you have any comments regarding this book, or any further information, especially photographs or paintings of ships where I have none. It would be historically good to show at least one for each ship, and since this is an electronic edition it will be possible to update and include any new information. I can be contacted at [email protected] If printing this book, it is best printed as an A5 booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Galveston's Concrete Ships
    THE HISTORY OF GALVESTON’S CONCRETE SHIPS A Thesis by DOROTHY ANNE ROWLAND Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Kevin Crisman Committee Members, Donny L. Hamilton Zachary Grasley Head of Department, Cynthia Werner December 2018 Major Subject: Maritime Archaeology and Conservation Copyright 2018 Dorothy Rowland ABSTRACT Selma is one of three World War I concrete shipwrecks in the Galveston area. While the other two are not identified, one of them is likely the Durham. This research explores how and why these ships ended their service here, and looks at the different methods used for the creation of early concrete ships and the differences in their performance. Selma, one of twelve Emergency Fleet Corporation ships, had a much different design than Durham, but both of the ships were out of use quickly after launch. Selma ran aground and damaged its bow; it was subsequently taken to Galveston for repairs that never occurred. Durham proved to be a very poor sailor, but remained afloat for many more years before becoming a fishing pier in Galveston. Both of these ships have histories of re-use that last beyond their abandonment. This research focuses on the history and construction of Selma and Durham. The text discusses the developments that lead to the development of these ships and how they fared after construction. Additionally, visual survey of how the condition of Selma has changed over time is included. ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Technograph5919441945cham.Pdf
    L I E> I^ARY OF THE U N IVLRSITY or ILLINOIS G20.5 TH ..59 AtTGF'^HAl-t STA6«S' o^ ,^ .<o ^# -^i^cc;*'/ rH Juuiuv m, iiLk iiiE last link in the 10-mile Shasta Dam convey- The Convejnr Co. 32«u E. Slauson ilvenu* lo9 Angeles, CdliTeml* in"; system is a mile and a half unit made by the Atteotloni Ur. U.S.Saxo, Prasi^ent, Conveyor Company of Los Angeles, using 17,500 New As joa toiDH, our use of tho trougtilng cor.voTor system at Sh&sta D&3 using NeM ijepsrture CoavoTor EtoU bearings and Installed by your cospai)/, Departure Self-Sealed Ball Bearings of two types. ^3 about Goopleted. '.;hen this Job was being discussed at the start, m questlonod ttm u» of Mew Departure Sealed Conveyor bearings in service on ^6 inctt belts For nearly four years this system has handled 13 Carrying six inch rock at 1,50 feet per lUnute, Considering that even ii; the building of uouldor Jan h« had not hii as large a conveyor problea, »« mre raluctant to experliMnt any aor* than ii« million tons of rock as big as 6 inches in diameter. hbd to In designing equip.unt for Shasta Dam. l^oH, after nearly four years irlth extreioely low and satisfactory .^'i> tenance costs, appraxiastely 13|0>M,C>^ tons hav« been handled vrith this The satisfactory service obtained is proof that these c^ulpnent. tie know that the greatest savljig In the use of thta deili^ ma In t^ft self-sealed "Lubricated-for-life" ball bearings are not alialnation of lubricAtins and of cleaning up after lubricating, uada possible by the use of sealed bearings.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbuilding in Tampa During World War II
    Sunland Tribune Volume 16 Article 13 1990 Shipbuilding in Tampa During World War II Lewis N. Wynne Florida Historical Society Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune Recommended Citation Wynne, Lewis N. (1990) "Shipbuilding in Tampa During World War II," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 16 , Article 13. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune/vol16/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sunland Tribune by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STILL THEY SAIL SHIPBUILDING IN TAMPA DURING WORLD WAR II By LEWIS N. WYNNE, Ph.D. Executive Director The Florida Historical Society ANOTHER SHIP SLIDES DOWN THE WAYS …USS MAUNA LOA LAUNCHED APRIL 4, 1943 -Photo from HAMPTON DUNN COLLECTION When the planes from Vice Admiral Chuichi realized--that they were in a fight for the Nagumo's carriers attacked the American very survival of the world as they knew it. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, the United States was thrust into the Paper presented by Dr. Lewis N. Wynne cauldron of world war. before Gulf Coast History and Humanities Conference, University of Subsequent declarations of war by Adolph South Alabama, Mobile, AL, March 10, Hitler and Benito Mussolini merely 1989. confirmed what the American public already had demoralized the people of the United States and had hobbled its industry to the point that it appeared to be dead, but the reality of the situation was that American industry was merely hibernating, awaiting some stimulus to bring it to life.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Applications of Concrete During World War I Vyta
    Engineering the Permanent Material: Research and Applications of Concrete During World War I Vyta Baselice, The George Washington University In 1904, the American Society for Testing Materials produced specifications for manufacturing cement. To test consistency, researchers were instructed to first create a paste by mixing cement with water, form it into a ball with their hands, and then complete the process by “tossing [the ball] six times from one hand to the other, maintained about six inches apart.”1 Resembling cooking rather than industrial manufacturing, early practices of cement testing were deeply inaccurate and unreliable. The making of concrete was similarly inconsistent, involving a haphazard pouring and mixing of various materials whose properties were virtually unknown and quantities poorly calculated. Research and application efforts of concrete during World War I radically transformed the making and testing of this “civilizing medium.” Indeed, American manufacturers reveled in the fact that while the invention of concrete could be traced to Europe, its elevation to a material of ubiquity rested in the expert hands of American researchers.2 Employing wartime scientific advances in geological research, testing, and construction, American scientists learned to engineer the material to build almost anything. This paper argues that the wartime investments that the American government, universities, and businesses made in concrete technologies cemented American dominance of the industry and shaped global knowledge of the material. By examining the work of governmental bodies and science organizations, like the Emergency Fleet Corporation and the National Research Council, alongside that of private players, like the Edison Portland Cement Company, the narrative brings to light the conflict’s transformation of the American concrete industry and its new positioning on the global stage.
    [Show full text]
  • FLEET of STONE a Hull Made of Artificial Stone Seemed Scarcely More Than an Concrete Has Been a Novel Hull Material for 150 Years
    Reinforced concrete has been a novel shipbuilding material for a very long time. Concrete strengthened by iron bars was patented in 1848 by French inventor Joseph Monier – who, it is said, was seeking to build a better flowerpot – and within a few years was on its way to acceptance as a material for small building construction. The public’s first mass exposure to concrete hull technology came in 1855 at the Universal Exposition in Paris, where visitors were greeted by a reinforced concrete rowboat built by Joseph- Louis Lambot. Though Lambot’s creation won kudos for novel use of new technology, it failed to commercialize the concrete hull. Wood was still the shipbuilding materi- al of choice, with iron only beginning to gain acceptance. FLEET OF STONE A hull made of artificial stone seemed scarcely more than an Concrete has been a novel hull material for 150 years. interesting eccentricity. Though far from sparking ust off the eastern shore of Pelican Island, a shipbuilding revolution, near Galveston, Texas, stands one of the Lambot’s little boat did Jmore peculiar monuments on the United ignite a slow flame of States’ National Register of Historic Places. imagination that never It is the largely intact hull of a stranded, burned out. ancient oil tanker the SS Selma. The Selma has been distinguished with an official During the next six Texas Historical Marker granted by the decades, shipbuilders in Texas Historical Commission, designated Europe, England, Norway, a State Archaeological Landmark by and America built con- the Texas Antiquities Committee, crete sailboats, rowboats, and honored as the official flagship of the Texas Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1918
    Second Annual Report of the United States Shipping Board DECEMBER 1 1918 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1918 TABLE OF CONTENTS I UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD rase Organization of the Board 7 Functions of the Shipping Board 8 Investigations bearing upon the Development and Regulation of the American Merchant Marine 11 Legislation affecting the Shipping Board 13 Recommendations 16 Representatives of the Shipping Board on other governmental agencies 1 Allied Maritime Transport Couucit 17 2 War Industries Board 18 3 War Trade Board 18 4 Labor Policies Board 19 5 Exports Control Committee 19 Relations with other departments of the Government 1 With the Navy Department 19 2 With the War Department 20 3 With the Department of Justice 20 4 With the Department of State 20 5 With the Treasury Department 21 6 With the Department of Commerce 21 7 With the Department of Labor 21 8 With the Railroad Administrationn 21 Summary and classification of vessels under the jurisdiction of the Shipping Board 21 Table IAmerican and foreign steam and sailing vessels classified accord ing to sources of acquisit ion 23 Table IIAmerican and foreign steam and sailing vessels assignment and form of control 24 Table III American and foreign tankers assignment and form of control 26 Table IVAmerican and foreign steamers assignment and form of con trol0 0 0 28 Table VAmerican and foreign sailing vessels and auxiliary schooners assignment and form of control 30 Table VI American and foreign steamers distributed between those manned by the Shipping Board and those
    [Show full text]
  • Books\Short Stories.Pdf
    Contents Messages From A Concrete Ship ................................................................................... 1 1 Introduce system .................................................................................................... 1 2 Politics and risk ...................................................................................................... 3 3 Democracy ............................................................................................................. 4 4 Introduce referenda - fishing .................................................................................. 6 5 Birthright payment ................................................................................................. 7 6 Religion 1 ............................................................................................................... 9 7 Legalisation .......................................................................................................... 10 8 Arms sales ............................................................................................................ 12 9 Country league table ............................................................................................ 13 10 Religion 2 ........................................................................................................... 15 11 Tax carbon ......................................................................................................... 17 12 Access Rights ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World War II on the Savannah Waterfront in the American Theater of Operations
    World War II on the Savannah Waterfront in the American Theater of Operations Wartime Production and Service in Savannah City of Savannah Research Library and Municipal Archives August 29, 2008 World War II on the Savannah Waterfront in the American Theater of Operations Wartime Production and Service in Savannah Contents Research Summary Wartime Production Port of Savannah (Cargo Port) Private Industry Shipbuilding MacEvoy Shipbuilding Company Savannah Machine & Foundry Company Southeastern Shipbuilding Corporation Lend-Lease Program Excellence in Production Awards Wartime Service American Theater of Operations United States Coast Guard Coast Guard Auxiliary Coast Guard Reserves Temporary (USCG R(T)) Volunteer Port Security Force (VPSF) Harbor Pilots United States Army Savannah Army Service Forces Depot (ASF) United States Navy Navy Inshore Patrol, Savannah Section Base, Cockspur Island Savannah-Chatham County Defense Council Savannah Women in Service Miscellaneous U-boat 505 Visits Savannah Maps The Port of Savannah, 1945 Port Facilities (Piers, Wharves and Docks) Water Front Property Terminal Sites City of Savannah, 1945 World War II on the Savannah Waterfront – Research Summary The following brief articles represent preliminary research into the various activities that were occurring along the Savannah waterfront in support of World War II. The progression of research defined the themes of wartime production and wartime service. The greater Savannah community was greatly involved in wartime production through the conversion of the Port of Savannah into a military cargo port for Lend-lease goods and the development of wartime industries manufacturing paper, asphalt, naval ships, and much more. Wartime service along the waterfront included citizen soldiers and sailors volunteering in civilian and military organizations, including the Savannah-Chatham County Defense Council and the United States Coast Guard Temporary Reserve’s Volunteer Port Security Force.
    [Show full text]