NEWSLETTER No 15 April 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEWSLETTER No 15 April 2018 Whistler Society www.whistlersociety.org Hon Patrons: Dr. Stephen Bury, Frick Collection, New York; Dr. Lee Glazer, Freer Gallery, Washington; Dr.Charles Saumarez Smith, Royal Academy, London; Professor Margaret MacDonald, Glasgow University Patrons: Lady Armstrong of Ilminster; William Loschert; Laurent Lourson; Pemberton Greenish; Sloane Stanley Estate, John Thacker. NEWSLETTER No 15 April 2018 DATES FOR YOUR DIARY - SOCIETY EVENTS 25 APRIL WHISTLER, WILDE AND CHELSEA - Sold Out 15 MAY THE CRITICISM OF WHISTLER PRINTS 11 JULY ANNUAL WHISTLER DINNER AT THE CHELSEA ARTS CLUB Details to follow OTHER EVENTS EXHIBITION - RODIN AND THE ART OF ANCIENT GREECE, BRITISH MUSEUM, LONDON, 26 APRIL-29 JULY 2018 The exhibition will provide a new opportunity to focus on the Parthenon sculptures as individual works rather than as part of an ensemble and understand the extent of the influence of the art of antiquity on Rodin and his contemporaries. Rodin never actually visited Greece. His knowledge of the Parthenon came from books, and the sculptures in the Louvre and the British Museum. He first visited the Bloomsbury museum in 1881, and returned at least 15 times. In 1902 he said “in my spare time I simply haunt the British Museum”. His last visit was months before his death in 1917. He usually stayed in the Thackeray, directly opposite the main entrance of the museum. Rodin was a friend of Whistler and particularly when Whistler lived in Paris in the 1890s. Whistler had also been influenced by the British Museums collection when he was working and particularly the tanagra figures. PLAY - RODIN AND HIS LONDON FRIENDS Friday 18 May 2018, 18.30–19.45. British Museum £10 A specially commissioned play written by classicist Sue Blundell inspired by Auguste Rodin and his influential friendship group in London. Rodin met Eve Fairfax, Max Beerbohm and others while sketching some of the Parthenon sculptures in the British Museum. With their help, he travels back in time to revisit his former setbacks and triumphs. The dinner given in his honour at London's Café Royal in 1902 remains a highlight. In his speech that night, he said: 'In my life I have had some good and bad moments. This is one of the best.' Whistler was unable to attend the Café Royal Dinner but he invites Rodin for breakfast. Whistler says that Rodin was very distinguished, but he never asked to see any of Whistler's works. 'It seemed a lack of - well, of what West Point etiquette would have demanded in such a situation ....,'. Rodin could behave very arrogantly at times. (Courtesy Sue Blundell) https://www.eventbrite.com/e/rodin-and-his-london-friends-tickets-41491787052?aff=es2 EXHIBITION - PRINT REBELS, BANKSIDE GALLERY 25 APRIL - 13 MAY 2018 The Music Room, Whistler, 1858; Self Portrait, Haden,1862; This exhibition celebrates the 200th anniversary of the birth of the founder and first President of the Royal Society of Painter-Printmakers, Francis Seymour Haden. Prints by Haden and those who inspired him including Rembrandt and Durer will be included, along with works by his contemporaries including Palmer and Whistler; members of the RA who were closely associated with the RE and current members of the RE responding directly to their Society's heritage. EXHIBITION - WHISTLER AND PENNELL: ETCHING THE CITY LADY LEVER ART GALLERY, PORT SUNLIGHT, LIVERPOOL 4 MAY TO OCT 2018 Rotherhithe, The Lime-Burner, Edgar Thomson Steel Works, Pittsburg, Courtland Street Ferry, New York, The Bridges, New York, All Images courtesy of National Museums Liverpool The exhibition captures the changing landscape of New York and London in the final years of the industrial revolution. Featuring 38 prints from two of the most influential and innovative etchers - James McNeill Whistler (1834-1903) and Joseph Pennell (1857-1926), the exhibition highlights an important period in the history of etching known as the 'Etching Revival'. It explores how both artists championed a declining art medium, and their motivation to create a definitive technique and style. The artists shared an interest in the role of architecture, engineering, industry and production, but differed in their approach. Whistler’s imagery captured the individual characteristics of the city and its workers, while Pennell’s provides an impersonal and more distant perspective. The exhibition also explores the lives of both American artists and their motivations for immigrating to Britain in the second half of the 19th century. NEWS BOOK LAUNCH: WHISTLER’S MOTHER AT FINE ART SOCIETY – 13 MARCH Top Row: Martin Riley, Cllr Ian Adams -Lord Mayor of Westminster, Charles Saumarez Smith – Royal Acadamy, Dan Sutherland and Georgia Toutziari (photos Mark Eastment) Charles Saumarez Smith says in his blog: I went to the launch last night of the new biography of Whistler’s Mother: Portrait of an Extraordinary Life by Daniel Sutherland and Georgia Toutziari (actually, I was speaking at it). The book contains an account of how Whistler’s picture of his mother was submitted to the annual Summer Exhibition at the Royal Academy in April 1872 and very nearly turned down: too unfinished perhaps, too nakedly emotional, too monochrome (these were all comments of the critics when it was first shown). They had already turned down The White Girl, his great portrait of Joanna Hiffernan ten years earlier, now The Symphony in White No. 1, one of the masterpieces of the National Gallery of Washington. Then, Sir William Boxall RA, the Director of the National Gallery, a shy man, who had been a friend of Wordsworth, told Council that he would resign if they did not accept the picture. The picture was grudgingly accepted and is now recognised as one of the greatest pictures of the nineteenth century. We wanted to borrow it for our forthcoming exhibition about the ups and downs of the Summer Exhibition, The Great Spectacle (opens June 12th.), but sadly weren’t able to. I’m sorry because it might have been possible to judge what its impact must have been amidst acres of mediocre subject painting. ALEXENDER IONIDES GRAVESTONE, HASTINGS CEMETERY, EAST SUSSEX Top - The gravestone of Alexander Ionides (1810–1890), merchant, and art patron. He was one of the most important early patrons of Whistler. Alexander’s two sons Constantine and Aleco were friends of Whistler when they were studying in Paris. Alexander’s gravestone was commissioned by Constantine and designed by Philip Webb, and has recently been cleared of vegetation (2018) in contrast with a photograph taken in 2016 revealing its full splendor. Bottom - Alexander before leaving moving to Hastings had lived at 1 Holland Park, London, designed by Philip Webb and William Morris. The contemporary photographs above show the house and the Dining Room where can be seen Whistler’s self portrait, and bought from him by Alexander and now in Detroit Institute of Arts. IMPRESSIONISTS IN LONDON, TATE BRITAIN UNTIL 7 MAY 2018 Top - Whistler's Nocturne: Blue and Silver - Chelsea, 1871 is on display at the Tate's "Impressionists in London" exhibition until May. Whistler painted the Nocturne from a front window at 96 Cheyne Walk and is described by Whistler's mother. Bottom - Also in the exhibition is Monet’s Charing Cross Bridge (1899-1902) which was painted from the Savoy Hotel a few years after his friend Whistler had stayed at the Hotel and chosen the subject for a lithograph in 1896. REMEMBERING EUNAN KING The Whistler Society was stunned and saddened to learn of the passing of Eunan King last February 21. A native and resident of Ireland, Eunan was one of the Society’s most steadfast supporters. He eagerly attended Society meetings and events in London, and with a regularity that led many members to assume he lived in the city. He was last at the How Whistler Made Prints event in November at Michelle Avison’s print studio in the depths of Stockwell. He was quick to leave with a bag for the airport. Naturally, he admired Whistler’s art, but his abiding interest was in Joanna Hiffernan. Eunan had spent several years researching her life, to the point that he was arguably the leading authority on Whistler’s White Girl. Most recently, his knowledge and fascination with Jo had led him to write a novel about her relationship with Whistler. He had all but completed the book, and with every expectation of seeing it published, at the time of his passing. His family hopes that Eunan’s dream may still be realized in time for an exhibition that will feature Jo in 2020. Publication of his work will be the tribute Eunan would have most appreciated, but for his many friends, that happy event can hardly substitute for the memories of irrepressible good humour, insatiable curiosity, and infectious enthusiasm he left us. Daniel Sutherland .
Recommended publications
  • Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings: Proceedings
    PART THREE History of the Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings 188 Critical History of Panel Painting Restoration in Italy Andrea Rothe panel conservation techniques are directly related to a long history of panel construction that dates to Mantiquity and flourished from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance (see Uzielli, “Historical Overview,” herein). The ingenuity and intuition of the woodworkers of the past compensated for their lack of scientific understanding of this complex and widely diverse material. Central Italy, in particular, produced a large quantity of paintings on panel. Many of them—such as the Cimabue Crucifix in the Church of Santa Croce in Florence—were constructed to the highest standards of craftsmanship. The early woodworkers often used techniques or methods similar to those applied by modern-day restorers in treating panels—techniques such as movable crossbars (Figs. 1, 2) and coats of gesso, paint, or red lead to seal the backs of panels (Fig. 3). These sealants were probably applied as humidity barriers and protection against wood-boring insects, and panels treated in this manner have often survived better than untreated panels. The large number of panel paintings in Italian churches and muse- ums created the need for appropriate conservation work, particularly in modern times. The state-run centers of Florence and Rome have become the largest and most advanced in Italy and have generated a group of highly qualified experts in this field. The volume of panel work that has been executed in Florence far surpasses that of any other conservation center in the world. Figure 1, right Fra Angelico, Annunciation, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Cecilia Riva an Art World Insider: Austen Henry Layard and the Nineteenth-Century European Art Trade
    ISSN: 2511–7602 Journal for Art Market Studies 2 (2018) Cecilia Riva An Art World Insider: Austen Henry Layard and the Nineteenth-Century European Art Trade ABSTRACT chase a great assortment of art objects, ranging from Cypriot pottery to Renaissance paintings, In the lively context of the European art mar- from Spanish religious artefacts to Burgundian ket of mid-nineteenth century, Austen Henry tapestry. In order to analyse the cultural and Layard (1817-1894) played an active role both economical implications of these relocations, as a private collector and advisor, and equal- this paper examines the relations of this net- ly as a trustee and unofficial travelling agent work within the European connoisseurship, the for London museums. Thanks to his extensive formation of Layard’s personal collection and travels throughout Europe and the Middle East, his contributions to private and public institu- he became acquainted with the most eminent tions. figures of the art world and was able to pur- The memory and reputation of Sir Austen Henry Layard (Paris, 1817 – London, 1894) is mainly connected to his archaeological enterprises at Nineveh and Nimrud, but in fact, as Frank Davis wrote, he “was a man of parts, with a finger in many pies”.1 Compared to the abundance of studies on his archaeological achievements, Layard’s political and diplomatic career has been less explored and accounts of his life lack a com- prehensive record on his commitment to the art world.2 Both his bequest to the National 1 Frank Davis, Pioneer of modern archaeology, in The Illustrated London News (Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • NGA1 Boxall Papers 1723-1966
    NGA1 Boxall Papers 1723-1966 GB 345 National Gallery Archive NGA1 Boxall Papers 1723-1966 11 boxes Created by Sir William Boxall and numerous correspondents. Administrative history Boxall was born in Oxfordshire on 29 June 1800, the son of an exciseman. He was educated at Abingdon Grammar School, and entered the Royal Academy NGA1 Schools in 1819. Between 1827 and 1830 he travelled throughout Italy and Sicily studying paintings. Boxall first exhibited paintings at the Royal Academy in 1823, and over the next decade began to forge a successful career as a portrait painter. In 1851 he was elected an Associate of the Royal Academy, and in 1863 a full Academician. Between 1823-1866 he exhibited over 80 works at the Royal Academy. In February 1866, the Trustees of the National Gallery appointed Boxall as the new Director, to succeed Sir Charles Eastlake who had died the previous December. Boxall had not been the first choice for Director: the Prime Minister, Lord John Russell, had favoured Austen Henry Layard (Under Secretary at the Foreign Office), but he declined the post. The Queen suggested J.C. Robinson, Superintendent of Art at South Kensington. Gladstone finally suggested Boxall. The demands of the position were so great that they strained Boxall's health, and he considered resigning after five years. However, the Trustees and Prime Minister prevailed on him to remain, and he continued until 1874. As Director, Boxall travelled throughout Europe to survey pictures for possible acquisition, and to study the management of foreign collections. He visited Italy, France, Belgium, Germany, Spain and Austria-Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Library and the Intelligentsia of Victorian London
    The London Library and the Intelligentsia of Victorian London Helen O’Neill [I]t is clear that the existence of an intelligentsia is more often asserted than it is demonstrated, and more often assumed than it is explored. William Whyte he diplomat, author, and lawyer W. D. Christie articulated the founding principles of the Society of Tthe London Library in a published letter to the Earl of Clarendon. Christie declared that the Library would play a role in the intellectual life of the nation by “guiding and lightening the labours of those who build up the nation’s wisdom and the nation’s fame” (32). Established in 1841 as a lending library for subscribing members nine years after the First Reform Act (1832), nearly a decade before the Public Libraries Act (1850), and more than a quarter century before the Second Reform Act (1867), the London Library provided a singular service in the metropolis offering books “in all departments of knowledge and in all languages” (Christie 34) to subscribing members that were not available from circulating libraries or for loan from the British Museum. Pre-dating the Science Museum, Natural History Museum, National Portrait Gallery, and Victoria and Albert Museum, the London Library remains a subscription lending library today. Its book collections acquired since 1841 by purchase, donation, and bequest number in excess of one million volumes, have not been subject to systematic stock weeding, and remain therefore a remarkably intact collection CSA 31 2015/16 184 CARLYLE STUDIES ANNUAL used and shaped by its Victorian members. In 1841 the Library, capitalizing on advances in rail and post infrastructure, positioned itself as a national institution with international credentials: “The Library will contain books in all departments of literature and philosophy and in all languages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sir George Scharf Sketchbooks 2
    The Sir George Scharf Sketchbooks 2. Introduction to SSB 43 (14 June–20 October 1856) by Philip Cottrell, University College Dublin NB. All page references are to SSB 43 and catalogue numbers refer to items from the Art Treasures Exhibition’s Gallery of Ancient Masters unless otherwise specified. Scharf Sketchbook 43 covers the period from mid-June to late October 1856. Around forty Art Treasures items are represented, in addition to dozens of other miscellaneous works of art. As with most of the sketchbooks, Scharf assembled its content in a reasonably regular and chronological manner, although some pages have been removed, a couple have been left blank (pp. 134-135), and there are a few gaps in its compilation. These include an unusually long seven-week hiatus which lasted from early August to the end of September which coincided with a convulsive turn of events in Scharf’s personal and professional life. Not least of these was his appointment, at the age of thirty-five, as Art Secretary to the Manchester Art Treasures Exhibition on 8 August. The first two thirds of SSB 43, up to page 86, predate this crucial moment, and are largely devoted to a visit to Cambridge between Saturday 28 June and Wednesday 2 July followed by a two-week tour of Edinburgh and the Scottish Borders which began on 21 July.1 The sketchbook then picks up again in late September, at which point Scharf’s new duties had entailed his removal from London to lodgings in Manchester, and thus began the first of Scharf’s several lengthy stints in the city, often of several weeks’ duration.
    [Show full text]
  • NGA2 Ralph Nicholson Wornum Papers C1831-C1900
    NGA2 Ralph Nicholson Wornum Papers c1831-c1900 GB 345 National Gallery Archive NGA2 NGA2 Ralph Nicholson Wornum Papers c1831-c1900 12 boxes Ralph Nicholson Wornum Administrative history Ralph Nicholson Wornum (1812-1877) was born at Thornton, near Norham, North Durham on 29 December 1812, the eldest son of Robert Wornum (1786- 1852) and Catherine Nicholson (1784-1856). Having studied at University College London in 1832, he was to have read for the bar, but soon abandoned the law, turning to art as his profession. He went abroad in 1834, spending six years familiarising himself with the galleries, museums and churches of Munich, Dresden, Rome, Venice, Florence and Paris. Following his return to England Wornum gradually achieved recognition as an important contributor to art journals, 'cyclopedias' and biographical dictionaries. In 1848 he was appointed lecturer on art to the Government Schools of Design, and in this capacity delivered lectures in many of the chief towns of England. The following year he was appointed librarian and keeper of casts to the Government Schools of Design. In December 1854, on the recommendation of Sir Charles Eastlake, he was chosen as successor to General Thwaites as keeper of the National Gallery and Secretary to the Board of Trustees. Wornum served in this post for twenty-two years until his death in 1877. In 1867 he published his major work on Hans Holbein: 'Some Account of the Life and Works of Hans Holbein, Painter of Augsburg with numerous illustrations'. Wornum was married first to Elizabeth Selden (1823-1860) of Virginia, stepdaughter of George Long. In 1861, after Elizabeth Selden's death, he married his first cousin Harriet Agnes Nicholson.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir George Scharf As an Emerging Professional Within the Nineteenth-Century Museum World
    A man of ‘unflagging zeal and industry’: Sir George Scharf as an emerging professional within the nineteenth-century museum world Elizabeth Heath Figure 1: Sir George Scharf, by Walter William Ouless, oil on canvas, 1885, NPG 985. © National Portrait Gallery, London Sir George Scharf was appointed first secretary of the newly established National Portrait Gallery early in 1857, becoming director in 1882 and retiring shortly before his death, in 1895 (fig. 1). Applied by the Gallery’s Board of Trustees when formally recording this event in their annual report, the phrase quoted in the title indicates the strength of Scharf’s commitment to his duties over the course of a career that spanned five decades.1 As custodian of the national portraits, Scharf’s remit encompassed every aspect of Gallery activity. Whilst he held responsibility for the display, interpretation and conservation of the collection in its earliest days, he also 1 Lionel Cust, 12 Sep. 1895, NPG Report of the Trustees 1895, 4, Heinz Archive and Library, NPG. Journal of Art Historiography Number 18 June 2018 Elizabeth Heath Sir George Scharf as an emerging professional within the nineteenth-century museum world devoted a significant amount of time to research into the portraits.2 To this end, Scharf oversaw the establishment of an on-site research library of engraved portraits, periodicals, books and documents. Coupled with his meticulous investigations into works in private and public collections across Britain, this served as a vital resource for authenticating potential portrait acquisitions. In recording what he saw by means of densely annotated sketches and tracings, Scharf developed a procedure for the documentation, identification and authentication of portraiture, which continues to inform the research practice of the Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Gb 0345 Nga1 2
    NGA1 NGA1/2 Charles Boxall Longland 1880-1966 correspondence 26 items Charles Boxall Longland was the nephew of William Boxall. The correspondence predominantly relates to the photography of three paintings by D. Camerino Arcangelus which Longland had photographed for Professor Venturi. The paintings had been acquired by Boxall during his travels in Italy. NGA1/2/1 Letter from George Scharf to Rev 11 Feb 1880 Charles Boxall. Longland 1 page Regarding the bequest of the portrait of Copley Fielding by William Boxall. NPG 601 NGA1/2/2 Points submitted to counsel by J.W. 28 Jun 1894 Williamson for an opinion re the will of Mrs E. Hickman 3 pages Including whether Rev Charles Boxall Longland can be a trustee of the estate. NGA1/2/3 Review of the 'The Mond Collection: An 24 Sep 1910 appreciation' by J.P. Richter, in 'The Athenaeum' 2 pages 251 NGA1 NGA1/2/4 Letter from Constance Jocelyn Ffoulkes 17 Apr 1910 to Rev Charles Boxall Longland 9 pages Regarding two pictures by D. Camerino Arcangelus purchased by William Boxall and now in Charles Boxall Longland's possession; also arranging for photographs to be sent to Miss Ffoulkes for Professor Venturi. NGA1/2/5 Draft letter from Rev Charles Boxall [1910] Longland to Constance Jocelyn Ffoulkes 2 pages Regarding the photography of the pictures by D. Camerino Arcangelus for Professor Venturi and a note by Sacchi on the paintings. NGA1/2/6 Letter from Horace Hart to Miss 22 Apr 1910 Longland 1 page Regarding the photography of the pictures by D. Camerino Arcangelus for Professor Venturi by Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Wales and United Kingdom Sites for BYU Wales Study Abroad
    Historic Wales and United Kingdom Sites for BYU Wales Study Abroad Volume 2 H–R Compiled by Ronald Schoedel Contents Articles Hadrian's Wall 1 Hampton Court Palace 10 Harlech Castle 20 Hay-on-Wye 27 Hill fort 31 Isca Augusta 39 Kenilworth Castle 43 Kidwelly Castle 61 King Doniert's Stone 62 King's College Chapel, Cambridge 63 Lacock 66 Lacock Abbey 68 Lanhydrock 71 Lanyon Quoit 74 Llandaff Cathedral 75 Malvern Hills 80 Margam Stones Museum 98 Monmouth 110 Monmouth Castle 126 Museum of London 130 Mên-an-Tol 135 National Assembly for Wales 137 National Eisteddfod of Wales 146 National Gallery 151 National Museum Cardiff 168 National Museum of Scotland 171 National Portrait Gallery, London 176 National Railway Museum 181 National Roman Legion Museum 194 National Slate Museum 195 Newcastle Castle, Bridgend 196 North Hill, Malvern 197 Offa's Dyke 199 Ogmore Castle 203 Old Beaupre Castle 205 Old Sarum 207 Oxford University Museum of Natural History 211 Oxfordshire 217 Palace of Whitehall 224 Pierhead Building 228 Plas Mawr 231 Preston England Temple 232 Raglan Castle 235 Roman Baths (Bath) 247 Roman Baths Museum 253 Royal Monmouthshire Royal Engineers 254 Royal Shakespeare Company 256 References Article Sources and Contributors 264 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 268 Article Licenses License 278 Hadrian's Wall 1 Hadrian's Wall Hadrian's Wall (Latin: Vallum Aelium, "Aelian Wall" – the Latin name is inferred from text on the Staffordshire Moorlands Patera) was a defensive fortification in Roman Britain. Begun in 122 AD, during the rule of emperor Hadrian, it was the first of two fortifications built across Great Britain, the second being the Antonine Wall, lesser known of the two because its physical remains are less evident today.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandro Botticelli's the Return of Judith to Bethulia and The
    Sandro Botticelli’s The Return of Judith to Bethulia and The Discovery of the Body of Holofernes and the Experiences of Quattrocento Florence A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Fine Arts of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Julia Biagini November 2011 © 2011 Julia Biagini. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Sandro Botticelli’s The Return of Judith to Bethulia and The Discovery of the Body of Holofernes and the Experiences of Quattrocento Florence by JULIA BIAGINI has been approved for the School of Art and the College of Fine Arts by Marilyn Bradshaw Associate Professor of Art History Charles A. McWeeny Dean, College of Fine Arts 3 ABSTRACT BIAGINI, JULIA, M.A., November 2011, Art History Sandro Botticelli’s The Return of Judith to Bethulia and The Discovery of the Body of Holofernes and the Experiences of Quattrocento Florence Director of Thesis: Marilyn Bradshaw The Book of Judith of the Old Testament Apocrypha has inspired various interpretations since the Middle Ages, which resulted in a range of Judith imagery produced in Renaissance Italy. Among the artists creating works representing Judith during this time was Sandro Botticelli, who painted Judith six times throughout his nearly forty-year career. This thesis reconsiders Botticelli’s The Return of Judith to Bethulia and The Discovery of the Body of Holofernes, two small panels in the Uffizi, Florence, by focusing on issues of function, date, and patronage. Like many Quattrocento images of Judith, the pair of paintings responded to the various interpretations of Judith and the Book of Judith.
    [Show full text]
  • John Forster As Biographer: a Case Study in Nineteenth-Century Biography
    1 John Forster as Biographer: A Case Study in Nineteenth-Century Biography Ph. D. Dissertation by Helena Langford September 2010 Department of English Language and Literature University College London Supervisor, Rosemary Ashton UCL 2 3 Abstract John Forster as Biographer: A Case Study in Nineteenth-Century Biography John Forster (1812-1876) has traditionally been glimpsed almost exclusively via his relationships with key nineteenth-century figures such as Thomas Carlyle and Charles Dickens. His biographical works can be seen as a nexus between the often conflicting positions which he occupied as a journalist, editor, literary agent and advisor, barrister, philanthropist, husband and government secretary. Forster’s biographical career is roughly divided into three periods; the early biographies (1830-1864) constituted several historiographies of key figures in the history of the long parliament, concluding in the two-volume Sir John Eliot (1864). The years 1848 to 1875 were occupied with biographies of eighteenth-century poets, novelists and dramatists, in particular Oliver Goldsmith (1848) and Jonathan Swift (1875). In the last decade of his life, Forster was diverted from these two passions by the memoirs of his friends, Walter Savage Landor (1869) and Charles Dickens (1872-4). Arising out of collaborative work with UCL and the Victoria and Albert Museum, this study centres on the National Art Library's Forster bequest. Examining and documenting in detail the materials which Forster collected and exploited to write his biographies, it explores the nature, both physical and intellectual, of Forster's library, and its importance in analysing his research and writing interests. The works are situated within the development of biography as a genre, and alongside the emerging ethos of unrestricted education and the new printing and binding technologies and techniques which were becoming available.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Frederic Burton and the Controversy of Art- Historical Expertise at the National Gallery, London, in the Late Nineteenth Century
    Sir Frederic Burton and the controversy of art- historical expertise at the National Gallery, London, in the late nineteenth century Elena J. Greer This article draws upon a range of archival materials to present and consider the curatorial practice of Sir Frederic William Burton (1816 – 1900), the third director of the National Gallery, London, between 1874 and 1894.1 The issue of expertise was highly pertinent in this period, since as soon as Burton’s retirement had been announced, the popular and critical press and members of the art-world began to debate the qualities required for a new director. The debate centred around the types of pictures that ought to be acquired for the Gallery and whether an artist or a so-called ‘expert’ (a scholarly connoisseur) would be the best qualified to make these acquisitions. At the same time, the relative hierarchy of the director and trustees was recast through what became known as the Rosebery Minute, named after the newly-elected prime minister, Lord Rosebery. The Rosebery Minute, issued in 1894, altered the terms of an 1855 Treasury Minute – the result of a Parliamentary Select Committee begun two years earlier – which had established the post of director and vested it with sole authority to make acquisitions. After the Rosebery Minute the director was simply allocated equal status with the trustees.2 The 1853 Parliamentary Committee also designed an acquisitions policy advocating that pictures of the earlier Italian schools from foreign collections ought to be the focus of the director’s attention, in order to illuminate the later Italian schools that dominated the collection.
    [Show full text]