DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of the 2003 Mid-Columbia PUD Bull Trout Study Results Through 27 August 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of the 2003 Mid-Columbia PUD Bull Trout Study Results Through 27 August 2003 Summary of the 2003 Mid-Columbia PUD Bull Trout Study Results through 27 August 2003 Detection Summary: • This summary includes fixed-site telemetry data through 27 August 2003 at Rock Island, Rocky Reach, and Wells dams; as well as the fixed-telemetry sites on the Wenatchee, Entiat, Methow, and Okanogan rivers. It also includes aerial survey data through 12 August 2003 and boat survey data through 22 July 2003. To date, three boat and three aerial surveys have been conducted during the 2003-2004 study period. Table 1 summarizes the last known location of all radio-tagged bull trout as identified by release location. • Monitoring of radio-tagged bull trout at the fixed-site telemetry systems at Priest Rapids and Wanapum dams concluded on 16 June 2003. Monitoring at those locations was conducted during Grant PUD’s radio-telemetry evaluation of smolt passage during the spring migration and concluded at the completion of that study. To determine if radio-tagged bull trout migrate downstream into the Grant PUD project area, we will rely on detections of tagged fish within the tailrace of Rock Island Dam. • For the 2003-2004 study period, no new bull trout were captured and tagged. Instead, we continue to track fish tagged in May and June of 2002 (N = 40). Those fish were tagged with transmitters with an estimated tag life of two years, which should continue to operate until the completion of this study period (31 March 2004). • Based on current telemetry data there are seven tagged bull trout in the mainstem Columbia River, four in the Wenatchee River basin, 15 in the Entiat River basin, eight in the Methow River basin, and six transmitters have been recovered (Table 1). No tagged trout have been detected in the Okanogan River. • Of the seven tagged bull trout located within the mainstem of the Columbia River, one is downstream from Priest Rapids Dam, one was last detected in the tailrace of Rocky Reach Dam, four were last detected upstream of Rocky Reach Dam between the dam and the Entiat River confluence, and one was last detected in the tailrace of Wells Dam. The fish that is downstream from Priest Rapids Dam was last detected in the tailrace of that project on 28 May. Prior to that detection, it was detected at Rock Island Dam on 24 May and at Wanapum Dam on 26 May. Efforts to locate this fish have been unsuccessful. • Of the four tagged fish in the Wenatchee River basin, one is in Ingalls Creek, a tributary to Peshastin Creek. The other three fish are in the Chiwawa River drainage; two residing in the Chiwawa River and one in Rock Creek, a tributary to the Chiwawa River. • Of the 15 fish in the Entiat River basin, two were last detected between the mouth of the Entiat River and the Mad River confluence, five are upstream of Preston Falls, and eight are located within the Mad River. • Of the eight fish detected in the Methow River basin, we last detected four in the mainstem Methow River (two between the mouth of the Methow River and Libby Creek, one between the confluences of Libby Creek and the Twisp River, and one upstream of the town of Winthrop) and four in the Twisp River, all of which are located upstream from the confluence of Buttermilk Creek. • There are ten fish that have not changed their position for an extended period of time. We will attempt to locate these fish and determine their current status. Recovered Transmitters: • At this time, a total of six transmitters have been recovered from fish tagged in 2002. Of these fish, one was tagged at Rock Island Dam, one at Rocky Reach Dam, and four at Wells Dam. A detailed report summarizing their detection histories and the location of their recovery will be included with the 2002/2003 report which will be distributed in September. It should be noted that the recovery of a transmitter does not necessarily mean that the tagged fish died. Of the six fish for which the transmitters were recovered, only one carcass has been Rocky Reach Project No. 2145 Bull Trout Study Update SS/4966 1 September 24, 2003 recovered. Furthermore, one fish was captured at Rocky Reach Dam during the 2002 tagging period that exhibited scars consistent with being tagged (e.g., surgical scar and a “star-shaped” scar where the tag exited the body). Based upon these observations, it appears that this fish lost its tag prior to being recaptured. Downstream Migration: • In consultation between Chelan County PUD and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, related to operation of the new Rocky Reach surface collection system, the Service requested that the PUD monitor tagged bull trout during the 2003 upstream migration to assess whether or not any of the tagged fish migrated downstream of a given project after ascending the fish ladders at Rock Island or Rocky Reach dams. We refer to such behavior as “downstream movement”. • We observed only one occurrence of “downstream movement” during the period 1 April to 27 August 2003, which encompasses most if not all of the period when bull trout are actively migrating upstream through the mainstem Columbia River. This happened on 15 June 2003. The fish was detected on 14 June in the tailrace of Rocky Reach Dam, where it ascended the ladder and exited the system the following day. Forty-four minutes after exiting the ladder, the fish entered and passed downstream through Unit 1. Prior to passing the dam, the fish was detected along the face of the powerhouse up to Unit 9, and also entered the surface collector briefly. After the downstream movement event, this fish was detected in the Wenatchee River near the town of Monitor at the fixed-telemetry site on 22 June 2003. Table 1. The last known location of radio-tagged bull trout (N=40) for the period of 13 May, 2002 to 27 August, 2003 as identified by release location. Location of Last Detection Hydroelectric Project Basin Below Columbia Recovered Release Location RIS RRH Wells Wen. Ent. Met. Okan. RIS1 River2 Tag Total RIS Tailrace 2 1 1 4 RIS Forebay 2 1 1 4 RRH Tailrace 2 7 1 1 1 12 RRH Forebay 1 6 3 1 11 Wells Tailrace 1 1 2 4 Wells Forebay 3 2 5 Totals: 011 41580 1 4 6 40 Notes: 1 This refers to any detections below the Rock Island tailrace (i.e., Wanapum pool or dam, and Priest Rapids pool or dam). 2 This refers to any detection during aerial or boat surveys within the mainstem Columbia, and excludes detections at dams. Bull Trout Study Update Rocky Reach Project No. 2145 September 24, 2003 2 SS/4966 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary Report Appraisal Assessment of the Black Rock Alternative
    Summary Report Appraisal Assessment of the Black Rock Alternative A component of Yakima River Basin Water Storage Feasibility Study, Washington Technical Series No. TS-YSS-7 Black Rock Valley U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region December 2004 The mission of the U.S. Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Yakima River Basin Water Storage Feasibility Study, Washington Summary Report Appraisal Assessment of the Black Rock Alternative Technical Series No. TS-YSS-7 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region FRONTISPIECES Cashmere h Bend Main Map Legend REGIONAL REFERENCE Major Dams / Diversion Dams Major Roads e Ditch, Canal, etc. in Streams Wenatchee Water Bodies Pipel City Boundaries -K WASHINGTON s Dam Yakima River Basin Boundary K u e Coeur d'Alene e tial K c h [_ Yakama Nation Boundary e [_ l u ten [_ s o Seattle L P Odessa Yakima Project Divisions a Keechel Spokane k m e ! ! K ! ! a Ephrata Government Reservation ! ! c Da h YAKIMA e s s RIVER L C County Boundaries a l k chesse e BASIN E l u Ka m Chelan County [_ L a k Lake e Yakima Easton Grant County Cle Elum Dam Kittitas County Douglas County Quincy Roslyn
    [Show full text]
  • Grant County Pud Under the Clean Water Act
    KAMPMEIER & KNUTSEN PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW BRIAN A. KNUTSEN Licensed in Oregon & Washington 503.841.6515 [email protected] September 19, 2018 Via CERTIFIED MAIL – Return Receipt Requested Re: NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE GRANT COUNTY PUD UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT Terry Brewer Dale Walker PUD Commissioner District 1 PUD Commissioner District 2 Grant County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Ephrata, WA 98823 Larry Schaapman Tom Flint PUD Commissioner District 3 PUD Commissioner A-At Large Grant County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Ephrata, WA 98823 Bob Bernd Managing Agent PUD Commissioner B-At Large Wanapum Dam Grant County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Ephrata, WA 98823 Managing Agent Priest Rapids Dam Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Dear Commissioners Terry Brewer, Dale Walker, Larry Schaapman, Tom Flint, and Bob Bernd, and Managing Agents for the Wanapum Dam and the Priest Rapids Dam: This letter is to provide you with sixty days notice of Columbia Riverkeeper’s (“Riverkeeper”) intent to file a citizen suit against the Grant County Public Utility District and Commissioners Terry Brewer, Dale Walker, Larry Schaapman, Tom Flint, and Bob Bernd, in their official capacity as the Commissioners of the Grant County Public Utility District (collectively, “PUD”) under section 505 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project—FERC Project No
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AMENDING LICENSE TO MODIFY RIGHT EMBANKMENT OF THE PRIEST RAPIDS DAM Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project—FERC Project No. 2114-303 Washington Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 AMENDMENT REQUEST AND NEED FOR ACTION .......................................... 7 A. Amendment Request .................................................................................................. 7 B. Need for Action .......................................................................................................... 8 1.3 PRE-FILING CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC NOTICE ....................................... 8 1.4. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS...................................... 10 1.4.1 Section 18 Fishway Prescription ...................................................................... 10 1.4.2 Endangered Species Act ................................................................................... 10 1.4.3 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act .................... 11 1.4.4 National Historic
    [Show full text]
  • Results of a PIT Tag Study at Priest Rapids Dam to Assess the Impact of the Whooshh Fish Transport System on Upstream Migrating Sockeye Salmon
    Results of a PIT tag study at Priest Rapids Dam to assess the impact of the Whooshh Fish Transport System on upstream migrating Sockeye Salmon Conducted for Whooshh Innovations, LLC Jeffrey K. Fryer Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 700 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 1200 Portland, OR 97232 January 15, 2017 Abstract Between June 29 and July 22, 2016, 897 Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) were PIT tagged at the Priest Rapids Dam Off Ladder Adult Fish Trap and released as part of a study to assess the impact of the Whooshh Fish Transport System (WFTS) on migrating salmon. During the first three weeks of the study, alternate groups of five Sockeye Salmon were sent via the WFTS or hand carried to the recovery area. Study fish were tracked upstream by PIT tag detections downloaded from www.ptagis.org. On July 22, WFTS tagged Sockeye Salmon were transported directly over the dam as opposed to going into the recovery area and continuing up the ladder, thereby missing detection at the top of Priest Rapids Dam. Wenatchee stock Sockeye Salmon were subsequently detected at Priest Rapids, Rock Island and Tumwater dams, while Okanogan stock Sockeye Salmon were subsequently detected at Priest Rapids, Rock Island, Rocky Reach, Wells, and Zosel dams. This study found no difference in survival between the WFTS and non-WFTS groups to either Wells or Tumwater dams combined over the entire study, however there were significant differences between the WFTS and non-WFTS groups in the distribution of Sockeye detected at individual dams that were likely attributable to differences in stock composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Passage Route Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Salmon at Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA Kyle B
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarWorks at Central Washington University Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU Electronic Theses Student Scholarship and Creative Works Fall 2015 Passage Route Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Salmon at Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA Kyle B. Hatch Central Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Hatch, Kyle B., "Passage Route Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Salmon at Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA" (2015). Electronic Theses. Paper 271. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Works at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. PASSAGE ROUTE SURVIVAL AND BEHAVIOR OF JUVENILE SALMON AT PRIEST RAPIDS DAM, COLUMBIA RIVER, WA A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Biology by Kyle Barrett Hatch November 2015 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis of Kyle Barrett Hatch Candidate for the degree of Master of Science APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Clay Arango, Committee Chair ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Alison Scoville ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Paul James ______________ _________________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT PASSAGE ROUTE SURVIVAL AND BEHAVIOR OF JUVENILE SALMON AT PRIEST RAPIDS DAM, COLUMBIA RIVER, WA by Kyle Barrett Hatch November 2015 Columbia River hydropower is an economic mainstay of the Pacific Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Apparent Losses of Chinook Salmon and Steelhead
    A STUDY OF APPARENT LOSSES OF CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD BASED ON COUNT DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DAMS ON THE COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVERS, 1967-1968 by Lowell C. Stuehrenberg Kenneth L. Liscom and Gerald E. Monan Final Report of Research Financed by U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Contract No. DACW57-67-C-0120) and NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center Coastal Zone and Estuarine Studies Division 2725 Montlake Boulevard East Seattle, Washington 98112 August 1978 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................... EXPERIMENTAL SITE AND EQUIPMENT ........... FISH TRAPS AND TAGGING BARGE .......... ACOUSTIC TAGS .................. FLAGTAGS .................... MONITORS .................... TRACKING EQUIPMENT ............... GENERAL EXPERIMENTAL PLAN .............. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES ............... TRAPPING AND TAGGING .............. MONITORING ................... BOAT DRIFTING .................. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS .. 1967e............ SPRING CHINOOK SALMON .............. Bonneville to The Dalles Dams ....... McNary to Priest Rapids and Ice Harbor Dams SUMMER CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD ....... Temperature Block ............. FALLBACK ..................... GENERAL OBSERVATIONS .. 1968............. SPRING CHINOOK SALMON .............. SUMMER CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD ..............39 Temperature Block ....................43 FALLBACK ........................... 45 CONCLUSIONS .............................46 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...........................48 LITERATURE CITED ..........................-49 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the DRS Website At
    Quincy Chute Hydroelectric Project Wanapum Dam Seattle Spokane Grant County Potholes Priest Rapids East Canal Dam Headworks Nine Canyon Wind Farm WANAPUM DAM QUINCY CHUTE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT Generation Units . 10. Rated Capacity . 1,203.6. MW Rated Capacity . 9.4. MW Concrete/Earthfill Length . 8,637. FT First Power Generation . .1985 Rated Head . 80 FT Construction Started . .1959 First Power Generation . .1963 POTHOLES EAST CANAL HEADWORKS PROJECT PRIEST RAPIDS DAM Rated Capacity . 6.5. MW First Power Generation . .1990 Generation Units . 10. Rated Capacity . 950. MW Concrete/Earthfill Length . 10,103. FT NINE CANYON WIND PROJECT Rated Head . 78 FT Construction Started . .1956 12 .5% of Project Peak Capacity . .12 MW First Power Generation . .1959 First Power Generation . .2003 ELECTRIC SYSTEM Overhead Distribution Lines . 2,795 MILES Underground Distribution Lines . 1,102. MILES Overhead Transformers . .24,477 Padmount Transformers . 9,935 115kV Transmission Lines . 282. MILES 230kV Transmission Lines . 202. MILES ACTIVE METERS Residential . 39,103. Irrigation . 5,193 Industrial . 122 Commercial . 7,248 Large Commercial . 107 Street Light and Other . .439 Total Active Meters . 52,212. SUBSTATIONS Distribution . 49 Transmission . 5. Transmission/Distribution . 3. HIGH SPEED NETWORK Customers with fiber-optic availability . .33,149 Customers using fiber-optic service . 19,043 Customers using wireless service . 290 As of Dec. 31, 2019 Grant PUD was established by local residents in 1938 to provide power service to all of the county’s residents. We honor the resolve of our founders through our guiding vision, mission and values. VISION Excellence in service and leadership. We continually ask how we can improve service quality, reliability and stewardship of our resources in the most cost-effective manner .
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 01 12 2016
    Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project (P-2114) 2016 Total Dissolved Gas Abatement Plan License Article 401(a)(19) By Carson Keeler Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington Priest Rapids Project FERC Project Number 2114 January 2016 Executive Summary This draft total dissolved gas abatement plan (GAP) provides details on operational and structural measures that the Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington (Grant PUD) plans to implement as part of its fish-spill program for the year 2016. These measures are intended to result in compliance with Washington State’s water quality standards for total dissolved gas (TDG) at the Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project (Project). The Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) establishes Washington state water quality standards for TDG during the non-fish and fish-spill seasons. This current year’s draft GAP (2016) is an update to the 2015 GAP submitted to the WDOE and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on January 30, 2015. Proposed operational abatement measures include minimizing involuntary spill by scheduling maintenance operations based on predicted flows, continuing to participate in the Hourly Coordination Agreement, which uses automatic control logic to maintain preset reservoir levels at the mid-Columbia River dams in order to meet load requirements and prevent involuntary spill, and attempting to maximize turbine flows by setting minimum generation requirements for its power purchasers. Operational abatement measures will also include (when feasible) participation in regional operator meetings to discuss regional TDG abatement measures, coordination of regional spill amounts and locations, and implementation of preemptive spill to avoid periods of high involuntary spill.
    [Show full text]
  • BILL ANALYSIS Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee HJM 4014
    Washington State BILL House of Representatives Office of Program Research ANALYSIS Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee HJM 4014 Brief Description: Concerning the reintroduction of salmon and steelhead above blocked areas of the Columbia river. Sponsors: Representatives Stanford, Blake, Van De Wege, Pettigrew, Ryu, Lytton and Pollet. Brief Summary of Bill Requests that the federal government and the entities representing the Northwest region pursue the reintroduction of salmon and steelhead in the reaches of the Columbia River upstream of the Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee dams using a pragmatic and science-based approach that features careful and coordinated planning, research, testing, and construction followed by monitoring, evaluation, and adaptive management. Hearing Date: 2/2/16 Staff: Jason Callahan (786-7117). Background: Fish Passage on the Columbia River. The portion of the Columbia River from Cape Disappointment to the Canadian border features 11 dams managed by a variety of owners that are engineered to provide multiple benefits. From the mouth to the Canadian border, these dams are the Bonneville Dam, the Dallas Dam, John Day Dam, McNary Dam, Priest Rapids Dam, Wanapum Dam, Rock Island Dam, Rocky Reach Dam, Wells Dam, Chief Joseph Dam, and the Grand Coulee Dam. Of those dams, all provide some amount of salmonid fish passage other than the Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee dams. Columbia River Treaty Recommendations. –––––––––––––––––––––– This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. House Bill Analysis - 1 - HJM 4014 The Columbia River Treaty (CRT) is an international agreement between Canada and the United States that provides for joint development, regulation, and management of the Columbia River in order to coordinate flood control and optimize electrical energy production on both sides of the border.
    [Show full text]
  • Upstream Migration Timing of Columbia Basin Chinook and Sockeye Salmon and Steelhead in 2017
    19-05 Upstream Migration Timing of Columbia Basin Chinook and Sockeye Salmon and Steelhead in 2017 Jeffrey K. Fryer, John Whiteaker, Denise Kelsey, and Jon Hess May 24, 2019 Upstream Migration Timing of Columbia Basin Chinook and Sockeye Salmon and Steelhead in 2017 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission Technical Report for BPA Project 2008-518-00, Contract 76151 Report date range: 1/17–12/17 Jeffrey K. Fryer John Whiteaker Denise Kelsey Jon Hess May 24, 2019 ABSTRACT Between April 19 and October 18, 2017, we sampled Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon as well as steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at the Bonneville Dam Adult Fish Facility (AFF). Fish were measured for fork length, scales were collected for analysis of age, tissue samples collected for genetic analysis, and the fish were tagged with Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags. These fish were tracked upstream as they passed through sites with PIT tag antennas, including fish ladders at dams, juvenile bypasses, hatcheries, weirs, as well as in-stream antennas. Total numbers of fish tracked upstream were 829 spring Chinook, 1,005 summer Chinook, 971 fall Chinook, 836 steelhead, and 1,079 Sockeye Salmon. Chinook Salmon median migration rates between mainstem dams ranged between 18.7 km/day for fall Chinook migrating between McNary and Priest Rapids dams and 42.0 km/day for spring Chinook migrating between The Dalles and McNary dams. An estimated 31.8% of spring Chinook passed into the Snake Basin upstream of Ice Harbor Dam, while an estimated 58.0% of summer Chinook passed upstream of Priest Rapids dam into the Upper Columbia Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • JOINT STAFF REPORT: SUMMER FACT SHEET NO. 1B Columbia River Compact/Joint State Hearing June 30, 2020
    OREGON AND WASHINGTON DEPARTMENTS OF FISH AND WILDLIFE JOINT STAFF REPORT: SUMMER FACT SHEET NO. 1b Columbia River Compact/Joint State Hearing June 30, 2020 Fisheries under consideration: Mainstem recreational salmon/steelhead Detailed information on stock status and management guidelines for Columbia River fisheries are presented in Joint Staff Reports, which are produced annually and available online. The most recent reports are the 2020 Sturgeon/Smelt Report (January 17, 2020) and the 2020 spring/summer report for Chinook, sockeye, steelhead, and other species (February 7, 2020). Links to the online reports are https://wdfw.wa.gov/fishing/management/columbia-river and http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/OSCRP/CRM/jsmreports.asp STOCK STATUS Upper Columbia Summer Chinook • Upper Columbia summer Chinook pass Bonneville Dam during June 16 through July 31 destined for areas above Priest Rapids Dam. These Chinook are not listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the population is considered healthy. • The 2020 preseason forecast of 38,000 adults to the Columbia River mouth is similar to the 2019 actual return (34,619), and less than the recent 10-year average return of 72,000 adults. • Bonneville passage during June 16–29 totals 32,424 adult Chinook which is 172% of expected based on the preseason forecast and 5-year average run timing. The run is typically 50% complete by June 29 (5-year average). • The U.S. v. Oregon Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) met on Monday, June 29 and updated the summer Chinook return expectation to 65,000 Chinook at the Columbia River mouth. TAC’s next scheduled meeting is Monday, July 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Voith Awarded Contract for Upgrading Priest Rapids Dam in Washington, USA 2014-09-16
    Voith Hydro Holding GmbH & Co. KG Communications VHZ/hk Alexanderstr. 11 89522 Heidenheim, Germany Tel. +49 7321 37-6354 Fax +49 7321 37-136866 www.voith.com Voith Awarded Contract for Upgrading Priest Rapids Dam in Washington, USA 2014-09-16 Voith will rehabilitate the turbines in the 10-unit powerhouse located on the Columbia River over the next decade HEIDENHEIM. Voith Hydro has been awarded the contract to rehabilitate and upgrade the turbines in the 10-unit powerhouse at Grant County (Washington) Public Utility District’s (PUD) Priest Rapids Dam on the Columbia River. Installation of the upgraded vertical Kaplan turbines, with a majority of the rehab work being performed at Voith’s York, Pennsylvania facility, will span 10 years starting in 2016, with one unit upgraded per year. Voith performed extensive model testing over the past several years, culminating in a successful customer witness test in Lausanne, Switzerland in June 2013. Each turbine is rated at approximately 100 MW. “Voith is excited to work with Grant County PUD on turbine upgrades at the Priest Rapids Dam over the next decade,” said Kevin Frank, President and CEO of Voith Hydro York, USA. “With these improvements, Priest Rapids will continue to serve Grant County PUD customers for many decades to come and continue the Pacific Northwest’s leadership in generating the abundant, clean, and low-cost hydropower that provides energy to hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses in the region.” Cavitation free performance and stringent fish passage criteria were critical components for the final awarded design of the turbine.
    [Show full text]