The War Against the Kitchen Sink Pilot

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The War Against the Kitchen Sink Pilot The War Against the Kitchen Sink Pilot Another way to describe “The War Against the Kitchen Sink Pilot” would be: “How to Overcome the Premise Pilot Blues.” A premise pilot literally establishes the premise of the show. Often they’re expository—it’s Maia’s first day at Diane’s law firm; the first time Mulder and Scully are working together; the day Cookie gets out of prison; when Walt decides he’s going to cook meth and potentially deal drugs. Premise pilots generally reset everything. When they work well, the creators take their time establishing the introduction into the world. We get the launch of the series in a nuanced, layered, slow burn way. I’m more satisfied by a pilot that has depth; there’s time for me to get to know the characters before throwing me into a huge amount of plotting. For me, character is always more important than plot. Once the characters are established, I’ll follow them anywhere. In 1996, when John Guare, the smart, prolific, outside-the-box playwright and screenwriter, published his first volume of collected works, he wrote a preface for the book The War Against the Kitchen Sink. One of the things Guare was rallying against was that desperate perceived need for realism, such as of drab objects in plays, when they could only ever be a construct. More interested in inner realities, !1 he grew curious in musicals, because there is no fourth wall. The actors interact with the audience, and Guare was intrigued by the connection between the audience and the actors on stage. If they got a big laugh or applause, they would pause, bow and acknowledge; they had a relationship with the audience. He wondered why plays had to be so limited, with people sitting and talking in one room, all exposition, in a naturalistic, proscenium arch presentation. He was knocked out by Lorraine Hansberry’s classic play, A Raisin in the Sun. As he explains: ...[The play] began in a real living room with a dreaded kitchen sink spouting real water. But suddenly, in the second act, in a stroke of madness, we moved into an imagined African interior. I was inside Sidney Poitier’s head. I was not simply engaged in watching these people. In one flash, I understood these people. Characters’ inner realities, expressed visually—via action and specific behaviors— are more important than cramming too much plot, everything including the kitchen sink, in the pilot. Guare championed putting the unconscious on stage and unlocking parts of it. He responded positively to Chekhov’s Three Sisters: !2 Get me to Moscow. Get me to New Orleans. Give me some shape to the voices in my head. Show me the forces moving me. Don’t show me a theater whose prime focus is only creating an illusion of surface reality, where the play is true because, ‘Look! It’s a real room, with real water running into the kitchen sink. Ergo, real.’ He talked about moving beyond naturalism: Does the playwright elect to use the kitchen sink to soothe the audience? Does the playwright dismantle the kitchen sink, and take the audience into dangerous terrain? How the playwright resolves this tension between surface reality and inner reality, how the playwright restores the theater to true nature as a place of poetry, song, joy, a place of darkness, where the bright truth is told; that war against the kitchen sink is ultimately the history of our theater. When We Bond With a Show Making the internal external and turning a plot outside in are our main challenges as visual storytellers. There have been certain expectations around the one-hour drama pilot, that broadcast networks have perpetuated for decades. First, the !3 pilot had to get strong numbers. Broadcast networks by definition need to cast the broadest, widest net possible. When creating pilots, the mandate was, we have to hook the audience on Episode 1. That’s when the audience was either going to fall in love with the characters, connect to the premise of the show and tune in for subsequent episodes or seasons; but if we didn’t get them with that first episode, the show would die. Nielsen ratings were all about the overnight rating. Before the digital television revolution, high overnight ratings were everything. Those Nielsen ratings have since been declared almost irrelevant. Les Moonves, the CEO of CBS Corporation, has stated publicly (as have many network and studio executives) that overnight ratings don’t matter anymore. There is an “overnight plus,” (or LIV+3 days, for example) which expands the rating system (there’s still the overnight, but they open it up for some days after that, to allow for DVR viewing and those who don’t catch the show in its regular timeslot but catch it over the next two, three, four days). But that’s also becoming irrelevant, due to the prevalence of on-demand television. If a show is programmed on linear television against a strong competitor, it doesn’t matter if an audience watches one show first or another; as long as they watch it, the show will find a life. Now, the pilot doesn’t have to cram everything into it and prove itself, nor be prototypical episode of a program on steroids, to make the audience !4 tune in and come back for more with great anticipation (or else fail). It’s a blizzard of plot that can distance us from getting to know the characters and leave us snow-blind. I always instruct my students: When in doubt, simplify. A great pilot is simple but not simplistic. For me, a simple but layered plot is always preferable to a convoluted, rushed premise pilot that tries to do too much (with the side effect of also losing credibility) and ends up alienating the viewers. Check out the pilot to NBC’s Blindspot and to see what I’m talking about—it’s a fun, intriguing premise, but everything happens so fast! Variety published an article back on September 23, 2015, about how Netflix data revealed exactly when TV shows hook viewers. Clue: It’s not the pilot. Given that Netflix now has 94 million subscribers globally, they know a lot about us from data and algorithms. They’re aware of our tastes, what we watch, what we buy, how long we keep watching, when we come back for more, what other shows we watch after watching those shows, what shows we watch historically. They take such data and instead of doing Nielsen ratings, they actually account for our tastes. Accordingly, they take what they hope is a predictable pattern and program to specifically targeted viewers. Netflix did research to find out when 70% of viewers were hooked on to certain shows and would go on to complete the entire season. This tipping point was never after the pilot. For The CW’s show !5 Arrow, it wasn’t until Episode 8. For A&E’s Bates Motel, it happened after Episode 2. Grace and Frankie tipped at Episode 4. I also personally felt that by that episode, the show had hit its stride and found its tone. With Better Call Saul, it was by Episode 4. Better Call Saul is an interesting example, as it’s the prequel to Breaking Bad. The audience came in with the expectation of wanting to learn more about Saul Goodman. We don’t even meet “Saul” in the first season; he’s still Jimmy McGill, which may be why it takes the audience a little longer to get into the show than for Breaking Bad, on which the audience was hooked by Episode 2 (which featured that scene of the acid in the bathtub). So, we never have to feel we need to force anything or cram everything into the pilot episode. Here’s the litmus test: If anyone has to ask him or herself, “Is that forced, or is it organic?”—it's forced. If that little voice is questioning something, listen to it. When writing comedies and musing, “Is that funny?” Believe me, it’s not. If you’re wondering, “Do I need that line, or should I cut it?” Cut it. That inner voice helps us and is our weapon in the war against the kitchen sink pilot. There’s no need to panic about shoving everything, including that mundane kitchen sink, into the pilot. We need to trust ourselves, and our audience’s intelligence, enough !6 to introduce characters who are going to be so compelling that we don’t have to force them into overly intricate plot lines all in the pilot episode. When our characters are iconic, distinctive and come from personal connections to our own unique voices, our show is going to reach that tipping point and find its audience. Don’t be misled by overworking plot or unnecessary expository detail. Lead and invite us into the world, at the speed that’s right for the story you want to tell, and we’ll be piqued to come back and follow those iconic characters, anywhere. Note John Guare, The War Against the Kitchen Sink, Volume 1 (Smith & Kraus Publishing, 1996). !7.
Recommended publications
  • Let's Count: Evaluation of a Pilot Early Mathematics Program in Low
    Let’s Count: Evaluation of a Pilot Early Mathematics Program in Low Socioeconomic Locations in Australia Bob Perry Ann Gervasoni Charles Sturt University Australian Catholic University <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Sue Dockett Charles Sturt University <[email protected]> The Let’s Count pilot early mathematics program was implemented in five early childhood educational contexts across Australia during 2011. The program used specifically formulated materials and workshops to enlist the assistance of early childhood educators to work with parents and other family members of children in their settings to help develop these children’s awareness, confidence and skills in early mathematics. The pilot program was evaluated by the authors of this paper using a multi-methods approach. The evaluation was focused on the success of the Let’s Count program in bringing early childhood educators, parents and other family members together, to enhance children’s mathematical engagement, learning outcomes and dispositions. Let’s Count is a new early mathematics program commissioned by The Smith Family to assist parents and other family members to help their young children aged 3-5 years notice, explore and talk about powerful mathematical ideas in ways that develop positive dispositions to learning as well as mathematical knowledge and skills. It relies on parents and other family members providing the opportunities for the children to engage with, talk about, and document the mathematics in their everyday lives, and to extend it in ways that are relevant to them. Let’s Count is not a mathematics teaching program. However, it does involve early childhood educators in the role of advisers to parents and family members of the children in their settings.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Hegemonic Social Structures in "Friends"
    "I'LL BE THERE FOR YOU" IF YOU ARE JUST LIKE ME: AN ANALYSIS OF HEGEMONIC SOCIAL STRUCTURES IN "FRIENDS" Lisa Marie Marshall A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2007 Committee: Katherine A. Bradshaw, Advisor Audrey E. Ellenwood Graduate Faculty Representative James C. Foust Lynda Dee Dixon © 2007 Lisa Marshall All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Katherine A. Bradshaw, Advisor The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze the dominant ideologies and hegemonic social constructs the television series Friends communicates in regard to friendship practices, gender roles, racial representations, and social class in order to suggest relationships between the series and social patterns in the broader culture. This dissertation describes the importance of studying television content and its relationship to media culture and social influence. The analysis included a quantitative content analysis of friendship maintenance, and a qualitative textual analysis of alternative families, gender, race, and class representations. The analysis found the characters displayed actions of selectivity, only accepting a small group of friends in their social circle based on friendship, gender, race, and social class distinctions as the six characters formed a culture that no one else was allowed to enter. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project stems from countless years of watching and appreciating television. When I was in college, a good friend told me about a series that featured six young people who discussed their lives over countless cups of coffee. Even though the series was in its seventh year at the time, I did not start to watch the show until that season.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forest Resiliency Burning Pilot Project
    R E S O U C The Forest Resiliency Burning Pilot Project December 2018 N A T U R L The Forest Resiliency Burning Pilot Project Report to the Legislature December 2018 Prepared by Washington State Department of Natural Resources and Washington Prescribed Fire Council Cover photo by © John Marshall. ii Executive Summary More than 100 years of fire suppression and land management practices have severely degraded Eastern Washington’s fire-adapted dry forests. Without the regular, low-intensity fires that created their open stand structure and resiliency, tree density has increased and brush and dead fuels have accumulated in the understory. The impact of these changes in combination with longer fire seasons have contributed to back-to-back record-breaking wildfire years, millions spent in firefighting resources and recovery, danger to our communities, and millions of acres of severely burned forest. Forest resiliency burning, also called prescribed fire or controlled burning, returns fire as an essential ecological process to these forests and is an effective tool for reducing fuels and associated risk of severe fires. Forest experts have identified 2.7 million acres of Central and Eastern Washington forests in need of restoration (Haugo et al. 2015). The agency’s 20-year Forest Health Strategic Plan addresses the need to increase the pace and scale of forest restoration treatments, which includes the use of prescribed fire. Successful implementation of prescribed fire in dry forest ecosystems faces a number of challenges, primarily unfavorable weather conditions, smoke management regulations, and some public opposition. Recognizing these challenges, the urgent need for large-scale forest restoration, and the usefulness and benefits of prescribed fire, the Legislature passed Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 2928.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Crops Harvest Pilot Report Full-6
    Supporting small-scale farmers to prevent in-field food loss. Hannah M. Semler, Whole Crops, Founder >>>> Introduction Across Maine’s foodshed, an estimated 25 million pounds of edible produce is left unharvested in fields.1 With more than 8,000 farms in Maine, the volume per crop is not easily visible, its value is not quantifiable, and the food systems that could absorb it such as processing for institutional kitchens, and donations programs, are underdeveloped or underincentivized. For more fresh nutritious produce to make it out of the field, a harvest-to-order, glean-to-donate concurrent Whole Crops Harvest (WCH) model is suggested in this pilot project report as an on-farm food loss prevention program. To create a secure market system that will warrant the efforts described in this report, of in-field measurement systems, online platform marketing tools, processing infrastructure and coordinated distribution systems, a larger statewide and regional approach is needed. The WCH Pilot was designed to support the USDA Local Food Promotions Project Grant “Scaling for Growth in the Greater Portland Area” with an opportunity to work with existing surplus production left in fields to de-risk the food systems solutions that were being tested by project partners. In fact, what the pilot illustrated was the need for a student agricultural workforce development effort to emerge statewide, reintroducing farm skills as an essential component of higher education and generational food security as a whole. 2 In Maine 65% of farms earn less than $10,000 per year. Many of these farms are extremely efficient in ​ ​ utilizing almost everything in the field, while others are learning the systems as new and beginning farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline and Business Jet Pilot Demand Outlook
    Airline and Business Jet Pilot Demand Outlook 10-year view 2020 Update FOREWORD The civil aviation industry will require more than 260,000 new pilots over the next decade. Dear aviation colleagues, Today, our industry is facing unprecedented challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic is profoundly impacting day to day life, slowing down the global economy, and causing widespread disruption. The sudden drop in air travel demand has hindered the industry’s record growth trajectory. The consensus is that the road to recovery will span over several years. As the global aviation community looks ahead, many of us have acknowledged that our industry will have to overcome several funda- mental challenges. First and foremost, it is important to understand the ripple effects of the pandemic on the aviation industry. In March-April 2020, travel restrictions and border closures caused an abrupt decline in passenger air travel. Airlines and operators around the world have adjusted their operations to align with lower demand. Thousands of pilots have been furloughed in recent months. Many of them have pivoted to other professions and might not want to resume their pilot careers. On the one hand, airlines and operators have reduced the pilot workforce to offset the financial impact of the pandemic. On the other hand, data indicates that the industry will face significant challenges in the upcoming years to meet the demand for pilots. Despite the short-term decline in the number of active pilots, analysis shows that the civil aviation industry will require more than 260,000 new pilots over the next decade. As air travel resumes progressively over the next several years, the industry will experience upward mandatory retirement and attrition rates.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quantitative Evaluation of Pilot-In-The-Loop Flying Tasks Using Power Frequency and NASA TLX Workload Assessment
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2014 A Quantitative Evaluation of Pilot-in-the-Loop Flying Tasks Using Power Frequency and NASA TLX Workload Assessment Antonio Gemma Moré University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Moré, Antonio Gemma, "A Quantitative Evaluation of Pilot-in-the-Loop Flying Tasks Using Power Frequency and NASA TLX Workload Assessment. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2014. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2739 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Antonio Gemma Moré entitled "A Quantitative Evaluation of Pilot-in-the-Loop Flying Tasks Using Power Frequency and NASA TLX Workload Assessment." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Engineering Science. Borja Martos, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Peter Solies, Steve Brooks Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) A Quantitative Evaluation of Pilot-in-the-Loop Flying Tasks Using Power Frequency and NASA TLX Workload Assessment A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Antonio Gemma Moré May 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Antonio Gemma Moré All rights reserved ii DEDICATIONS I dedicate the work that follows to my grandfather Anthony Enrico Gemma.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 TV Power Games: Friends and Law & Order
    8 TV Power Games: Friends and Law & Order There is no such thing as a one-man show | at least not in television: one feature that all TV shows have in common is the combination of a large number of diverse contributors: producers, scriptwriters, actors, and so on. This is illustrated in Exhibit 8.1, which depicts the links between key contributors to the making and selling of a TV show. Solid lines repre- sent some form of contractual relationship, whereas dashed lines represent non-contractual relationships of relevance for value creation and value distribution. As is the case with movies, pharmaceutical drugs, and other products, the distribution of TV show values is very skewed: many TV shows are worth relatively little, whereas a few shows generate a very high value: For example, at its peak Emmy Award-winning drama ER fetched $13 million per episode.1 How does the value created by successful shows get divided among its various contrib- utors, in particular actors, producers and networks? Who gets the biggest slice of the big pie? In this chapter, I address this question by looking at two opposite extreme cases in terms of relative negotiation power: Law & Order and Friends. Law & Order | and profits The legal drama series Law & Order was first broadcast on NBC on September 13, 1990. (The pilot episode, produced in 1988, was intended for CBS, but the network rejected it, just as Fox did later, in both cases because the show did not feature any \breakout" characters.) By the time the last show aired on May 24, 2010, it was the longest-running crime drama on American prime time TV.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Collection in a Social Science Study: a Pilot Study of Peer Impacts on Attitudes and Drinking Behavior
    DNA Collection in a Social Science Study: A Pilot Study of Peer Impacts on Attitudes and Drinking Behavior Jonathan K. Daw 1 , Hedwig Lee 1 , Amy Lucas 1 , Craig Owen 1 , and Emily McKendry- Smith 1 1 Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599 • Key Words: DNA collection, saliva, genetic studies, social survey • Direct correspondence to: Guang Guo, CB#3210, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210. Email: [email protected]. ABSTRACT. We report the experiences and participation rates of a pilot study (involving 200 individuals) of college drinking behavior incorporating both web survey and DNA collection components. Of the eligible sample, 78% completed the web survey, and 83.2% of those submitted DNA samples, for an overall participation rate of 64.9%. No evidence of lower participation rates along gender or racial/ethnic lines was observed, although there is some suggestive evidence of different levels of participant comfort with the process by race/ethnicity. Our experiences indicate that genetic data can be successfully collected for social science studies. We provide details of experiences in the data collection process and offer recommendations to inform future endeavors in DNA collection. 2 Social scientists today increasingly acknowledge and investigate the potential role of biological factors in relevant social processes (Committee on Population 2001; HERNANDEZ et al. 2006). Studies incorporating genetic variation into the study design – whether implicitly through twin studies, or explicitly through the use of molecular genetic information – hold the potential to separate the roles of social and biological factors in human behaviors of interest to sociologists.
    [Show full text]
  • 112508NU-Ep512-Goldenrod Script
    “Jacked” #512/Ep. 91 Written by Don McGill Directed by Stephen Gyllenhaal Production Draft – 10/30/08 Rev. FULL Blue – 11/6/08 Rev. FULL Pink – 11/11/08 Rev. Yellow – 11/13/08 Rev. Green – 11/17/08 Rev. Goldenrod – 11/25/08 (Pages: 48.) SCOTT FREE in association with CBS PARAMOUNT NETWORK TELEVISION, a division of CBS Studios. © Copyright 2008 CBS Paramount Network Television. All Rights Reserved. This script is the property of CBS Paramount Network Television and may not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of CBS Paramount Network Television. This copy of the script remains the property of CBS Paramount Network Television. It may not be sold or transferred and must be returned to: CBS Paramount Network Television Legal Affairs 4024 Radford Avenue Administration Bldg., Suite 390, Studio City, CA 91604 THE WRITING CREDITS MAY OR MAY NOT BE FINAL AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR PUBLICITY OR ADVERTISING PURPOSES WITHOUT FIRST CHECKING WITH TELEVISION LEGAL DEPARTMENT. “Jacked” Ep. #512 – Production Draft: Rev. Goldenrod – 11/25/08 SCRIPT REVISION HISTORY COLOR DATE PAGES WHITE 10/30/08 (1-58) REV. FULL BLUE 11/6/08 (1-58) REV. FULL PINK 11/11/08 (1-59) REV. YELLOW 11/13/08 (1,3,4,6,10,11,17,18,19, 21,25,27,29,30,30A,40,42, 47,49,49A,50,51,53,55, 55A,56,56A,57,59,60.) REV. GREEN 11/17/08 (3,6,19,21,35.) REV. GOLDENROD 11/25/08 (48.) “Jacked” Ep. #512 – Production Draft: Rev. FULL Pink – 11/11/08 CAST LIST DON EPPES CHARLIE EPPES ALAN EPPES DAVID SINCLAIR LARRY FLEINHARDT AMITA RAMANUJAN COLBY GRANGER LIZ WARNER TIM KING BUCKLEY LEN WALSH JACK SHULER/HAWAIIAN SHIRT GUY CAITLIN TODD BUS DRIVER MOTHER BUS TECH N.D.
    [Show full text]
  • KAREN RADZIKOWSKI 1St Assistant Director
    KAREN RADZIKOWSKI st 1 Assistant Director Television PROJECT DIRECTOR STUDIO / PRODUCTION CO. BILLIONS (seasons 5-6) Various Showtime EP: Brian Koppelman, David Levien, Andrew Ross Sorkin COLIN IN BLACK & WHITE (season 1) Ava DuVernay Netflix NY Unit EP: Ava DuVernay, Colin Kaepernick / Prod: Lyn Pinezich FBI: MOST WANTED (season 1) Various CBS / Universal Television EP: Dick Wolf, Arthur Forney, Peter Jankowski / Prod: Tom Sellitti ALTERNATINO (season 1) Various Comedy Central / Avalon Television EP: Jay Martel, Arturo Castro / Prod: Ayesha Rokadia AT HOME WITH AMY SEDARIS (seasons 1-2) Various truTV / A24 2018 + 2019 Emmy Nomination: Outstanding Variety/Sketch Series EP: Paul Dinello, Vernon Chatman, John Lee / Prod: Inman Young GOATFACE (variety/sketch) Asif Ali Comedy Central Cast: Hasan Minhaj EP: Asif Ali, Fahim Anwar / Prod: Steve Ast MARVEL’S IRON FIST (season 2) Various Netflix / Marvel Studios ep. 213 | tandem unit: ep. 204, 206 | 2nd unit: ep. 207 EP: Jim Chory, Dan Buckley / Prod: Lyn Pinezich RAMY (pilot presentation) Harry Bradbeer Hulu / A24 World Premiere: SXSW Film Festival EP: Jerrod Carmichael, John Hodges, Ravi Nandan Prod: Jamin O’Brien THE BREAKS (season 1) Various VH1 / Atlantic Pictures EP: Susan Levison, Bill Flanagan / Prod: Gary Giudice BALLERS (seasons 1-2) Simon Cellan Jones HBO EP: Dennis Biggs / Prod: Karyn McCarthy BURN NOTICE (2nd unit) Artie Malesci USA / Fox Television Studios EP: Terry Miller MAGIC CITY (season 1) Various Starz / Media Talent Group EP: Mitch Glazer, Ed Bianchi UNITED STATES OF TARA (season 3) Various Showtime / Dreamworks Television EP: Craig Zisk, Brett Baer, Dave Finkel / Prod: Dan Kaplow MAD MEN (2nd unit, season 4) Various AMC / Lionsgate Television EP: Matthew Weiner, Scott Hornbacher WARREN THE APE (season 1) Various MTV / MTV Productions EP: Kevin Chinoy GREG THE BUNNY (season 1) Various Fox / 20th Century Fox Television EP: Kevin Chinoy Features PROJECT DIRECTOR STUDIO / PRODUCTION CO.
    [Show full text]
  • * TV-Filmresume-Letrhd
    Glenn Berkovitz, CAS [email protected] 310- 902-1148 Production Sound Mixer Television programming: ANATOMY OF VIOLENCE (series pilot), 21st Century Fox Television/CBS - Dir.: Mark Pellington HOW TO LIVE WITH YOUR PARENTS (pilot + series), Fox Television/ABC - Prod: Claudia Lonow, Ken Ornstein, Mark Grossan THE SAINT (series pilot), Silver Screen Pictures - Dir.: Simon West BENT (series), NBC Universal Television/NBC - Prod.: Tad Quill, DJ Nash, Chris Plourde ZEKE & LUTHER (series - seasons 1, 2 & 3), Turtle Rock Pictures/Disney Channel - Prod.: Danielle Weinstock PARKS & RECREATION (series - pilot & season 1), NBC Television - Prod.: Morgan Sackett OCTOBER ROAD (series - season 2), Touchstone TV / ABC - Prod.: Scott Rosenberg, Mark Ovitz MEN OF A CERTAIN AGE (series pilot), Turner North / TNT Network - Dir.: Scott Winant COURTROOM K (series pilot), Fox Television - Dir.: Anthony & Joe Russo RAINES (series pilot), NBC Television/NBC - Dir.: Frank Darabont CAMPUS LADIES (series - 2 seasons), Principato/Young / Oxygen Network - Prod.: Paul Young, Brian Hall WEEDS (pilot + seasons 1 & 2), Lions Gate / Showtime Television - Exec. Prod.: Jenji Kohan, Mark Burley KAREN SISCO (series), Universal Television / ABC - Exec. Prod.: Bob Brush, Michael Dinner FOOTBALL WIVES (series pilot), Touchstone Television/ABC - Dir.: Bryan Singer HARRY GREEN AND EUGENE (series pilot), Paramount Pictures/ABC - Dir.: Simon West LUCKY (series), Castle Rock Television / F/X Networks - Exec. Prod.: Robb & Mark Cullen BOSTON LEGAL (assorted episodes), David E. Kelley Prod./Fox Television - Prod.: Bill D’Elia, Janet Knutsen CROSSING JORDAN (pilot + season 1), NBC Productions/NBC - Exec. Prod.: Tim Kring FREAKYLINKS (series), 20th Century Fox Television/Fox Broadcasting - Exec. Prod.: David Simkins M.Y.O.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends TV Show Trivia - Play from Home Edition
    Okanagan Regional Library Trivia Friends TV Show Trivia - Play from Home Edition Round 1 Category: The Main Cast 1.What Friend admitted to having very small feet for an adult? A. Ross B. Rachel C. Joey D. Chandler 2. What Friend stars in “Analyze This” with Robert DeNiro and Billy Crystal? A. Lisa Kudrow B. Jennifer Aniston C. Courteney Cox D. Matt le Blanc 3. Which Friend has a fear of swings? A. Monica B. Rachel C. Ross D. Chandler 4. Which two Friends sang “Endless Love” together? A. Ross & Rachel B. Monica & Chandler C. Joey & Ross D. Phoebe & Chandler 5. Which Friend has been married the most amount of time? A. Phoebe B. Joey C. Ross D. Rachel 6. What two Friends get together in London? A. Ross & Rachel B. Rachel & Joey C. Joey & Monica D. Chandler & Monica 7. Which Friend got hit by a tranquilizer dart? A. Chandler B. Rachel C. Phoebe D. Joey 8. Which Friend is revealed to be Monica’s first kiss? A. Ross B. Chandler C. Joey D. Rachel 9. Which Friend had an on and off addiction to smoking? A. Monica B. Rachel C. Ross D. Chandler 10. Which Friend directed the “Since You’ve Been gone episode” A. Matt le Blanc B. David Schwimmer C. Lisa Kudrow D. Matthew Perry Round 2 Category: Obscure Friends Knowledge 1.Actually, that sounds interesting. I think you should drink the ____. A. Cider B. Breast Milk C. Lemon Juice D. Fat Hint: Rachel is speaking to Ross. 2. Which is the episode where Joey gets the role of Dr.
    [Show full text]