DOCSLIB.ORG

L Rathnam Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
L Rathnam Dissertation The Politics of Skepticism: Montaigne and Zhuangzi on Freedom, Toleration, and the Limits of Government by Lincoln Edward Ford Rathnam A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Lincoln Edward Ford Rathnam 2018 ii The Politics of Skepticism: Montaigne and Zhuangzi on Freedom, Toleration, and the Limits of Government Lincoln Rathnam Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science 2018 Abstract: Contemporary political discourse often centers on a shared set of normative commitments: freedom, toleration, and limited government. This dissertation examines the theoretical basis for these commitments, through a comparative study of two eminent skeptics: Michel de Montaigne and Zhuangzi. Both develop forms of skepticism that are rooted in analyses of the phenomena of diversity and disagreement. They contend that our inability to reach convergence on central philosophical questions demonstrates the fundamental limitations of human knowledge. I argue that both offer novel and powerful arguments connecting these skeptical epistemological theses with the relevant normative commitments. In particular, both take skepticism to advance human freedom, by clearing away obstacles to effective action. As beings who are raised within a particular community, we inevitably acquire certain habits that constrain the forms of thought and action open to us. Skepticism helps us to recognize the contingency of those forms. In the interpersonal realm, both writers contend that skepticism generates an attitude of toleration towards others who live differently. This is because it undermines the theoretical claims upon which most forms of intolerance are constructed. I defend this claim with reference to the various forms of intolerance that existed in each writer’s context, Warring States era China and France during the Wars of Religion. iii Later chapters examine the political implications of these forms of skepticism. I argue that both writers suggest that skepticism helps to eliminate potentially dangerous political passions, notably personal ambition and the desire for glory. This leads to a more constrained view of government that encourages us to focus our attention on avoiding extreme cruelty and violence rather than pursuing grand political projects. iv Acknowledgements Were it not for my teachers, friends, and family, this dissertation could not have been written. Clifford Orwin, my supervisor, gave me invaluable support throughout the many iterations of this project. He has also provided a powerful model of the academic life for me, both as a scholar and as a teacher. The care and seriousness with which he approaches a text set the standard to which I aspire here. His concern for his students is truly exemplary, even, or especially, when they decide to venture off onto unfamiliar terrain. I am grateful to Melissa Williams for combining robust support for my project with trenchant criticisms of the particulars. At each stage, she urged me to aspire to a higher standard of argumentation. This dissertation is the better for my attempts to meet these standards. I have also benefitted tremendously from her efforts to think seriously about what it means to theorize in a comparative and cosmopolitan manner, from my first exposure to comparative political theory at a conference she organized in Seoul, to the completion of this dissertation. My intention to work on classical Chinese thought could not have come to fruition were it not for the support of Vincent Shen. He graciously accepted my request to join the dissertation committee, although I was a student in a different department and we had no prior contact. This was a turning point in my graduate education, as it led me to his wide-ranging courses on Daoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism. He also made possible my year as a M.A. student in the Department of East Asian Studies, which played a formative role in my training and intellectual development. His generosity throughout this process has been truly remarkable. Ryan Balot joined the committee as the departmental reader. I had already profited tremendously from my studies with him earlier in the program and, unsurprisingly, his comments v on the dissertation were extremely valuable. Stephen Angle served as my external examiner, and I could not have asked for a more thorough and helpful engagement with my work. Their challenges will contribute significantly to my efforts to refine this research. My work is also deeply indebted to my many teachers and mentors at Davidson College. I am grateful, in particular, to Peter Ahrensdorf, for introducing me to classical political theory and encouraging me to pursue graduate work. Since then, he has been a constant source of mentorship and friendly encouragement. I am also thankful for the guidance of Lance Stell, who provided me with a fateful introduction to the Zhuangzi while supervising a seemingly unrelated thesis on bioethics. I consider myself fortunate that my time in the Department of Political Science introduced me to many wonderful friends and colleagues: Andrew McDougall, Evan Rosevear, Chris LaRoche, Cam Cotton-O’Brien, Joe MacKay, Jonas Schwab-Pflug, Mauricio Suchowlansky, Nate Gilmore, Scott Dodds, Daniel Schillinger, Jaby Mathew, Matt Lesch, Amanda Arulanandam, Cáit Power, Taylor Putnam, David Polansky, Craig Smith, Emma Planinc, Zak Black, Laura Rabinowitz, Binfan Wang, Dorina Verli, Xunming Huang, Larissa Atkison, Seth Jaffe, and many others. Abe Singer has been a good friend, a stimulating interlocutor, and an astute co-instructor. Kiran Banerjee has provided all manner of advice, personal and professional, and hosted too many memorable celebrations to count. The same could be said of Abouzar Nasirzadeh, who has always stepped up to help with everything from getting our son a passport to organizing Thanksgiving dinner. Constantine Vassiliou has been a wonderful travel companion and a great source of insight into French political thought. Stephanie Murphy kept Lindsay and I sane throughout many marathon sessions of grading. vi I am grateful to my oldest friends, Conor McGrath and Ben Bryant, for all of the good times and good conversations that we have shared. They have helped me to stay on track throughout this process. I have also benefitted immensely, both as a person and as a scholar, from my friendship with Ashish George. Our conversations at Waffle House have, in the years since, provided me with assurance that reasonable discourse is possible even in the face of serious disagreement. It is my family who played the most significant role in making this work possible. My parents, Lincoln Y. and Deborah F. Rathnam, have always provided unfailing love and support. They created a home in which I was encouraged to pursue my intellectual interests, whatever they might be. I am grateful for their support through the twists and turns that inevitably result from the pursuit of an academic career. My sisters, Sarah and Hope, have been constant sources of love and encouragement throughout this process, and indeed throughout my life. My deepest gratitude belongs to my wife, Lindsay Mahon Rathnam. Since our first year of graduate school together she has been a perfect partner, and an exemplar of love, friendship, and scholarship. The birth of our son, Peter, during the final stages of our graduate work both challenged and delighted us, and he could not have a better mother or role model. Peter, too, deserves thanks for improving every day of our lives. His irrepressible spirit inspires us and keeps us moving forward. vii Table of Contents Acknowledgements iv Table of Contents vii Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1: Overview of the Dissertation 1 1.2: Contemporary Pluralism 1 1.3: Post-Enlightenment Defenses of Freedom and Toleration 7 1.4: Comparative Political Theory and Traditional Foundationalism 16 1.5: Varieties of Comparative Political Theory 19 1.6: Why Zhuangzi and Montaigne? 25 1.7: The Problem of Context 31 1.8: Overview of the Subsequent Chapters 38 A Note on the Composition of the Texts 41 A Note on Sources and Translations 46 Chapter II: Zhuangzi’s Skepticism 2.1. Zhuangzi on Freedom and Skepticism 47 2.2. Confucius and the Authority of the Past 53 2.3: The Mohist School 56 2.4: Mencius, Confucianism, and Human Nature 61 2.5: Knowledge and Skepticism in the Zhuangzi 69 2.6: The Significance of Difference 70 2.7: The Argument from Change 73 2.8: Theories of Perspective 79 viii 2.9: Zhuangzi’s Skeptical Arguments I: Naturalizing Disagreement 83 2.10: Zhuangzi’s Skeptical Arguments II: Against the Self 88 2.11: Zhuangzi’s Skeptical Arguments IV: Authority in the Body 91 2.12: Zhuangzi’s Skeptical Arguments V: The Authority of the Completed Heart 93 2.13: Zhuangzi and the Significance of Language 95 2.14: Is Zhuangzi’s Position Self-Contradictory? 102 2.15: Zhuangzi on Knowledge: Local and Universal 109 2.16: Zhuangzi and the Two Kinds of Knowledge in the “Happy Fish” Story 113 2.17: Conclusion 116 Chapter III: Montaigne’s Skepticism 3.1: Introduction 118 3.2: Montaigne and the Wars of Religion 122 3.3: Philosophy, Faith, and Skepticism: The “Apology for Raymond Sebond” 123 3.4: The Question of Faith 126 3.5: Humbling Reason 132 3.6: Skepticism and Philosophical Disagreement 140 3.7: Culture and Ethnocentrism 147 3.8: The Search for Tranquility 152 3.9: Experience as a Standard for Thought and Action 158 3.10: Achieving Freedom: The Fear of Death 171 3.11: Conclusion 187
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of
    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Marc D. Guerra, Ph.D
    Marc D. Guerra, Ph.D. Theology Department, Assumption College, 500 Salisbury Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 Office (508) 767-7575; Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph. D. Ave Maria University (Theology) Naples, Florida (May 2007) M.A. Assumption College (Theology) Worcester, Massachusetts (May 1994) B.A. Assumption College (Psychology) Worcester, Massachusetts (May 1990) ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Assumption College (Worcester, Massachusetts) Professor (2016-) Director of Core Texts and Enduring Questions Program (2016-) Associate Professor (2012-2016) Theology Department Chair (2012-) Ave Maria University (Naples, Florida) Associate Professor (2010-2012) Director of Graduate Programs in Theology (2007-2012) Assistant Professor of Theology (2004-2009) Assumption College (Worcester, Massachusetts) Instructor of Theology (1999-2004) SCHOLARLY CONCENTRATION Relationship between Faith and Reason Catholicism and the Political Order Pope Benedict XVI PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BOOKS Christians as Political Animals: Taking the Measure of Modernity and Modern Democracy (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2010). EDITED BOOKS Liberating Logos: Pope Benedict XVI’s September Speeches (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2014) Pope Benedict XVI and the Politics of Modernity (London: Routledge Publications, 2014). Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome: Essays in Honor of James V. Schall, S.J. (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2013). 1 The Science of Modern Virtue: On Descartes, Darwin, and Locke, coedited with Peter Augustine Lawler (DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 2013). Reason, Revelation, and Human Affairs: Selected Writings of James V. Schall (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2001). ARTICLES AND ESSAYS “Scientist, Scholar, Soul” in The New Atlantis, (48) Spring/Summer 2016. 110-120. “Moderating the Magnanimous Man: Aquinas on Greatness of Soul” in Theology Needs Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Ralph McInerny, edited by Matthew L.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe (In Theory)
    EUROPE (IN THEORY) ∫ 2007 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper $ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Minion with Univers display by Keystone Typesetting, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. There is a damaging and self-defeating assumption that theory is necessarily the elite language of the socially and culturally privileged. It is said that the place of the academic critic is inevitably within the Eurocentric archives of an imperialist or neo-colonial West. —HOMI K. BHABHA, The Location of Culture Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction: A pigs Eye View of Europe 1 1 The Discovery of Europe: Some Critical Points 11 2 Montesquieu’s North and South: History as a Theory of Europe 52 3 Republics of Letters: What Is European Literature? 87 4 Mme de Staël to Hegel: The End of French Europe 134 5 Orientalism, Mediterranean Style: The Limits of History at the Margins of Europe 172 Notes 219 Works Cited 239 Index 267 Acknowledgments I want to thank for their suggestions, time, and support all the people who have heard, read, and commented on parts of this book: Albert Ascoli, David Bell, Joe Buttigieg, miriam cooke, Sergio Ferrarese, Ro- berto Ferrera, Mia Fuller, Edna Goldstaub, Margaret Greer, Michele Longino, Walter Mignolo, Marc Scachter, Helen Solterer, Barbara Spack- man, Philip Stewart, Carlotta Surini, Eric Zakim, and Robert Zimmer- man. Also invaluable has been the help o√ered by the Ethical Cosmopol- itanism group and the Franklin Humanities Seminar at Duke University; by the Program in Comparative Literature at Notre Dame; by the Khan Institute Colloquium at Smith College; by the Mediterranean Studies groups of both Duke and New York University; and by European studies and the Italian studies program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Selections from the Zhuangzi: Chapter 3, "The Secret of Caring for Life"
    Primary Source Document with Questions (DBQs) S E L E C T I O N F R O M T H E Z H U A N G Z I : C H A P T E R 3 , “ T H E S E C R E T O F C A R I N G F O R L I F E ” Introduction Zhuangzi (also called Zhuang Zhou) was an historically verifiable man who lived somewhere around 360-280 BCE. The long book that bears his name is a combination of material that represents his own thinking and of other writings incorporated by various compilers and editors. Like Confucius, Mencius, Han Fei and others, Zhuangzi lived during the time when the kings of the Zhou dynasty had little real power and the kingdom had disintegrated into feudal states that were constantly at war with each other in shifting patterns of alliances and enmities. During the Warring States period (480-221 BCE), Zhuangzi and Laozi were not considered to be part of a single school of thought. Zhuangzi is more concerned with escaping from the world; Laozi, with cunning ways of ruling it. During the Han dynasty, both works’ concern with the Dao (the “Way” of Heaven) and their mystical understanding of that term inspired historians to lump them together under the single category of “Daoism.” The name stuck. Zhuangzi and Laozi are now forever linked as the two great progenitors of Daoist philosophy and religion. Selected Document Excerpt with Questions From Sources of Chinese Tradition, compiled by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom, 2nd ed., vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of Zhuangzi and the Commentatorial Tradition of Guo Xiang
    THE PHILOSOPHY OF ZHUANGZI AND THE COMMENTATORIAL TRADITION OF GUO XIANG Desislava Damyanova Guo Xiang (also known as Kuo Hsiang or Zixuan) is the author of the most important commentary on Zhuangzi – one of the classical Daoist texts.1 He is also known as the person who implemented the current arrangement of thirty-three chapters divided into inner, outer and miscellaneous sections. Although Guo’s initial aim might have been to elucidate the ideas in the original text, his commentary on Zhuangzi represents a substantial philosophical achievement compared to the core text. It contains many original ideas and we shall examine the textual issues on which he is commenting in a try to get a deeper insight into their meaning. Guo Xiang2 practiced his philosophical pursuits this way – within the framework of the Daoist classic – and his manner has served as a blueprint for the later Neo-Confucian synthesis of the Chinese thought. 1 There is some controversy in the recent years over the true authorship of Guo’s commentary - the earliest source, the Jin Shu (Standard History of the Jin Dynasty), accuses Guo Xiang of plagiarizing all but two chapters of the commentary from Xiang Xiu (d. 300 CE, writing a generation earlier). “Current scholarship, while acknowledging that Guo made use of Xiang Xiu’s work and other earlier commentaries, still credits Guo as the principal author. The evidence for this recognition falls into three main areas. Firstly, the most innovative philosophical features in the commentary do not correspond with those in other works by Xiang Xiu. Secondly, in the early twentieth century, a postface to the commentary was discovered which details the work Guo carried out and finally, various linguistic analyses and references in other works suggest that Guo is the principal author.” <http://www.iep.utm.edu/guoxiang/>10.10.2012 2 Actually very little is known about the life of Guo Xiang: he lived in a time of great political upheaval and his own career was one of consistent and significant success.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on Commerce, Conquest, War, and Peace
    MONTESQUIEU ON COMMERCE, CONQUEST, WAR, AND PEACE Robert Howse* I. INTRODUCTION:COMMERCE AS THE AGENT OF PEACE:MONTESQUIEU AND THE IDEOLOGY OF LIBERALISM n the history of liberalism, Montesquieu, who died two hundred and Ififty years ago, is an iconic figure. Montesquieu is cited as the source of the idea of checks and balances, or separation of powers, and thus as an intellectual inspiration of the American founding.1 Among liberal internationalists, Montesquieu is known above all for the notion that international trade leads to peace among nation-states. When liberal international relations theorists such as Michael Doyle attribute this posi- tion to Montesquieu,2 they cite Book XX of the Spirit of the Laws,3 in which Montesquieu claims: “The natural effect of commerce is to bring peace. Two nations that negotiate between themselves become recipro- cally dependent, if one has an interest in buying and the other in selling. And all unions are based on mutual needs.”4 On its own, Montesquieu’s claim raises many issues. Montesquieu’s point is that trade based on mutual dependency discourages war. Here, Montesquieu abstracts entirely from the relative power of the states in question, a concern that is pervasive in his concrete analyses of relation- ships among political communities. For example, later on in the same section of the Spirit of the Laws he mentions that trade relations between Carthage and Marseille led to jealousy and a security conflict: There were, in the early times, great wars between Carthage and Mar- seille concerning the fishery. After the peace, they competed in eco- nomic commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconstruction of Zhuangzi's Philosophy on Transcendence
    religions Article The Big and the Great: A Reconstruction of Zhuangzi’s Philosophy on Transcendence Limei Jiang Center of Value & Culture, School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; [email protected] Received: 29 November 2018; Accepted: 25 December 2018; Published: 4 January 2019 Abstract: This essay attempts to demonstrate the logic of Zhuangzi in his different attitudes toward “debate on big and small” by bringing into discussion the two versions of translation in the English languages, which provide a new approach to analyze the difference in the controversial commentaries on Zhuangzi. This essay points out that the ideal of “free and easy wandering” is a type of positive pleasure. By means of rational thinking and imagination, one’s searching for the external values is turned into the internal pursuit for wisdom in the transformation of things. Zhuangzi’s theory of transcendence not only provides the subject with multi-perspectives, but also substitutes the self-identity with self-value. Through the interaction between self-awareness and self-reaction, the subject can be unified with the great Dao through purposive activities. However, Guo Xiang’s commentary cancels the necessity of self-cultivation and negates the purposefulness of the subject, which underestimates the value of Zhuangzi’s construction of transcendence. Keywords: positive pleasure; purposiveness; self-awareness; self-reflection; no-self 1. Introduction The “debate on big and small” (xiaoda zhi bian小'K¨) was raised in the first chapter, Free and Easy Wandering (xiaoyaoyou逍e8), of the Zhuangzi. It is also discussed in other chapters such as On Making Things Fit Together (qiwulunPiº) and Autumn Waters (qiushuiË4).
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay What Is Wrong with Human Rights?
    Book Review: La loi naturelle et les droits de l’homme 451 Review Essay Pierre Manent, La loi naturelle et les droits de l’homme. Paris: Presses Univer- sitaires de France, 2018, 134 pp., $22.84 (kindle), $27.12 (paperback). What Is Wrong with Human Rights? José A. Colen University of Navarre (Spain) and CEPS Minho University (Portugal) [email protected] In 1942, under the shadow of World War II and the distressing situation of a divided and occupied France, Jacques Maritain wrote a small book which he described as “an essay in political philosophy.”1 The author felt that not only civilization was at stake, but the need to win the peace after winning the war. This required a political philosophy able to keep totalitarianism at bay. Mari- tain was among the most famous French neo-Thomist philosophers, having written extensively about Aquinas’s metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of nature, and ethics, but his own contribution to political matters had hitherto been scarce. It would probably have remained in the background had it not been for his active involvement in the UNESCO commission that debated the philosophical basis of the yet unborn Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The book-essay, entitled Les droits de l’homme et la loi natu- relle, starts from the relations between person and society and argues that the recognition of the dignity of the human person had its apex in “Christian philosophy,” notwithstanding the acknowledgment of other contributions. 1 Jaques Maritain, Les droits de l’homme et la loi naturelle (Paris: Paul Hartmann Éditeur, 1943), 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Derechos Humanos Como Ideología Una Lectura Desde El Pensamiento “Antimoderno” Human Rights As an Ideology a “Counter
    OctubreDerecho Público 2013 IberoamericanoLos, Nº derechos3, pp. 39-73 humanos [octubre como 2013] ideología. Una lectura desde el pensamiento “antimoderno” LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS COMO IDEOLOGÍA UNA LECTURA DESDE EL PENSAMIENTO “ANTIMODERNO” HUMAN RIGHTS AS AN IDEOLOGY A “COUNTER-MODERNIST” READING Julio Alvear Téllez* “Los derechos humanos hacen de la humanidad la medida de todas las cosas y desde el punto de vista religioso esto constituye una forma de idolatría”. Michael IGNATIEFF, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry, 2001. “Ya no tenemos mapas ni navegadores y ya no creemos en astrólogos y en profetas. Es el miedo a morir, la imaginación loca, el deseo más allá de todo objeto lo que nos puede conducir, sin plan pero con pasión, más allá de la crisis, con la esperanza incierta de inventar una sociedad” Alain TOURAINE, Après la crise, 2010. Resumen Hay que distinguir entre “derechos humanos” y derechos o bienes de la persona humana. Los primeros connotan una visión de los derechos fundamentales profundamente ideológica, que se vuelve explícita en la medida en que se analiza su génesis histórico-conceptual y su rol instru- mental al proyecto político totalizante de la modernidad. Dicho proyecto, hoy en declive, se ha presentado como “emancipador”, lo que en realidad es un eufemismo para cubrir el carácter subjetivista, constructivista y racionalista de los derechos humanos en el plano individual y colectivo, tendencia que hoy pulsa por disolver todo lo estable. Palabras claves: “derechos humanos”, modernidad, racionalismo, subje- tivismo, disolución. * Doctor en Derecho y Doctor © en Filosofía, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Profesor de Derecho Constitucional y miembro del Centro de Justicia Constitucional de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad del Desarrollo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Damned Neighbors Problem: Rousseau's Civil Religion Revisited
    religions Article The Damned Neighbors Problem: Rousseau’s Civil Religion Revisited Micah Watson Department of Political Science, Calvin University, 3201 Burton SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546, USA; [email protected] Received: 15 April 2019; Accepted: 25 May 2019; Published: 29 May 2019 Abstract: Near the conclusion of The Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau starkly proclaims that no state has been founded without a religious basis, and thus if he is right, every political community must grapple with the tension between the conflicting claims of the divine and the mundane. Because Christianity cannot solve this tension, Rousseau calls for a new religion, a civil religion. Whereas most of the academic treatment of civil religion follows various paths beginning with Robert Bellah’s original 1967 article, this essay explores more deeply the contours of Rousseau’s original articulation of the problem to which civil religion is his proposed solution. The essay concludes by suggesting that we can find important elements of Rousseau’s approach still alive and well in American politics and culture today. Keywords: civil religion; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; tolerance; social cohesion; Christianity; religion and politics 1. Introduction The academic treatment of civil religion as a cultural and religious phenomenon began with Robert Bellah’s 1967 Daedalus article, “Civil Religion in America” and continued in earnest for some time as sociologists, political scientists, historians, theologians, and religious studies scholars joined the discussion, some attempting
    [Show full text]
  • Raymond Aron's Response to Irresponsible Metaphysics*
    Raymond Aron’s Response to Irresponsible Metaphysics* Aurelian Craiutu Assistant Professor. Department of Political Science. Indiana University. Resumo Abstract Os livros de Raymond Aron apresentam-se como Raymond Aron’s books stand out as an example of um exemplo de um julgamento político lúcido lucid political judgment in an age of extremes in numa época de extremos em que muitos intelec- which many intellectuals shunned moderation and tuais se afastaram da moderação e foram atraí- were attracted to various forms of irresponsible dos para várias formas de metafísicas irrespon- metaphysics and political radicalism. By drawing on sáveis e de radicalismo político. Extraindo uma a representative selection from Aron’s writings selecção representativa dos escritos de Aron covering more than three decades of his life, this que cobrem mais de três décadas da sua vida, paper concentrates on the “committed observer” este paper concentra “no observador comprome- (spectateur engagé) as Aron’s response to tido” (spectateur engagé) a resposta de Aron irresponsible metaphysics. I also present and às metafísicas irresponsáveis. Eu também apre- comment on Aron’s views on the role, virtues, limits, sento e comento as opiniões de Aron acerca do and possibility of moderation in political life. papel, virtudes, limites, e possibilidade de mo- Although Aron brilliantly played the role of the deração na vida política. Embora Aron jogasse “committed observer,” he never gave a clear brilhantemente o papel do ”observador com- theoretical statement on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limit of Language in Daoism Koji Tanaka
    Asian Philosophy Vol. 14, No. 2, July 2004, pp. 191–205 The Limit of Language in Daoism Koji Tanaka The paper is concerned with the development of the paradoxical theme of Daoism. Based on Chad Hansen’s interpretation of Daoism and Chinese philosophy in general, it traces the history of Daoism by following their treatment of the limit of language. The Daoists seem to have noticed that there is a limit to what language can do and that the limit of language is paradoxical. The ‘theoretical’ treatment of the paradox of the limit of language matures as Daoism develops. Yet the Daoists seem to have noticed that the limit of language and its paradoxical nature cannot be overcome. At the end, we are left with the paradoxes of the Daoists. In this paper, we jump into the abyss of the Daoists’ paradoxes from which there is no escape. But the Daoists’ paradoxes are fun! Introduction ‘Don’t be guided by any guidance!’ is a paradoxical guidance. The only way to be guided by the guidance is by not being guided by it. But not being guided by the guidance, we are guided by it. How can we be guided or not be guided by this guidance? The main theme underlying Daoism is the paradox of this sort. The Daoists noticed the paradoxical nature of the guidance such as above. They ‘played’ with the paradox throughout the development of Daoism.1 This is not the picture that is painted by the dominant view of Daoism, however. Traditionally, Daoism is considered as mysticism.
    [Show full text]