DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy After Politics How Should the Next Administration Approach Public Land Management in the Western States?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TRANSCRIPT Policy after Politics How should the next administration approach public land management in the western states? Presented on June 1, 2000 By The Andrus Center for Public Policy Cecil D. Andrus, Chairman Student Union Boise State University Boise, Idaho TRANSCRIPT Policy After Politics How should the next administration approach public land management in the western states? Presented on June 1, 2000 By The Andrus Center for Public Policy Cecil D. Andrus, Chairman Student Union Boise State University Boise, Idaho ©2000 The Andrus Center for Public Policy FROM THE CHAIRMAN During the coming months, the major presidential contenders will spend a lot of time in campaign planes, flying over the American west. Unfortunately, it will be a rarity when one of the major party candidates actually campaigns in the vast region from Denver to San Francisco, from Missoula to Albuquerque. Even more rarely will the candidates address the huge issues that dominate the politics, the economics, and the lives of westerners. Nonetheless, in early November a new president-elect will start the critical process of putting together a government that will, indeed must, confront our issues. On June 1, 2000, the Andrus Center brought together a distinguished cast of current and former western governors of both parties with the goal of giving the new president and his future cabinet our game plan for how to shape the “policy after politics” in the west. Whether you are a conservationist worried about the future of salmon, a livestock operator concerned about a new approach to grazing on the public lands, a wood- products worker outraged by a roadless policy, or a citizen bedeviled by urban sprawl and oil prices, you will be interested in this discussion. We asked the governors to check the election-year rhetoric at the door but to come fully armed with their best practical, candid, and non-partisan advice. They did just that, and I have pledged to deliver personally to the president-elect the white paper that came out of the comments they made. It is our hope that those observations and suggestions will help shape a western agenda in the next Administration. Cecil D. Andrus Chairman Andrus Center for Public Policy CONFERENCE PROGRAM Policy After Politics How should the next administration approach public land management in the western states? June 1, 2000 7:00 a.m. Registration 1:30–2:30 a.m. Panel Discussion 2nd floor, BSU Student Union. Moderated by: Marc Johnson, Former Chief of Staff 8:15 a.m. Continental breakfast for Governor Andrus Lobby of Jordan Ballroom, Participants: BSU Student Union. John Kitzhaber, Governor of Oregon 8:40 a.m. Opening gavel for Policy After Politics Marc Racicot, Governor of Montana Jordan Ballroom, BSU Student Union. Phil Batt, Former Governor of Idaho Remarks and introductions by: First Republican governor in 24 years, former Cecil D. Andrus, Chairman, legislator, lieutenant governor, and leader on nuclear waste issues. Andrus Center for Public Policy Norm Bangerter, 8:50 a.m. Welcome and comments by: Former Governor of Utah Dirk Kempthorne, Governor of Idaho Former Chairman of Western Governors Association, two-term Republican governor, former speaker of 9:00–10:30 a.m. Keynote address: the Utah House of Representatives, leader on western “How should the next administration resource issues. approach public land management in Mike O’Callaghan, the western states?” Former Governor of Nevada John Kitzhaber, Governor of Oregon Idaho native, University of Idaho graduate, two-time Democratic governor, currently executive editor of A senior western, two-term Democratic governor and the Las Vegas Sun. recent advocate of breaching the four lower Snake River dams to aid salmon recovery. Jay Shelledy, Editor, Salt Lake Tribune Marc Racicot, Governor of Montana Former editor and publisher of Moscow Pullman Daily News, former managing editor of Lewiston Two-term governor and former state attorney Morning Tribune, award-winning columnist, reporter, general, who plays an influential role as close friend and keen observer of western politics. and advisor to Governor George W. Bush. 2:30–3:30 p.m. Forum for questions to and from 10:30 a.m. Refreshment Break speakers, responders, and audience. 11:00 a.m. Question and Answer Forum Moderated by: Moderated by: John C. Freemuth, Ph.D., Cecil D. Andrus, Chairman, Senior Fellow, Andrus Center for Public Policy Andrus Center for Public Policy Noon Luncheon, Jordan Ballroom, 3:30 p.m. Conference adjourned BSU Student Union. Speaker: Jay Shelledy, Editor, Salt Lake Tribune TABLE OF CONTENTS Policy After Politics How should the next administration approach public land management in the western states? Presented on June 1, 2000 By The Andrus Center for Public Policy At the Student Union, Boise State University Boise, Idaho OPENING REMARKS: Chairman Cecil D. Andrus ............................................. Page 5 WELCOME: Governor Dirk Kempthorne .......................................... Page 6 Governor of Idaho 1ST KEYNOTE ADDRESS: The Honorable John Kitzhaber ..................................... Page 8 Governor of Oregon 2ND KEYNOTE ADDRESS: The Honorable Marc Racicot ........................................ Page 13 Governor of Montana QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: Moderator: Cecil D. Andrus........................................... Page 20 LUNCHEON ADDRESS: Jay Shelledy ................................................................... Page 29 Editor, Salt Lake Tribune DISCUSSION PANEL: The Honorable Phil Batt................................................ Page 35 Former Governor of Idaho The Honorable Norm Bangerter.................................... Page 36 Former Governor of Utah The Honorable Mike O’Callaghan.................................. Page 37 Former Governor of Nevada Jay Shelledy ................................................................... Page 38 Editor, Salt Lake Tribune OPEN FORUM: Keynote Speakers, Panelists, Audience.. ...................... Page 38 PARTICIPANTS: Biographies.................................................................... Page 47 Policy After Politics How should the next administration approach public land management in the western states? Presented by The Andrus Center for Public Policy at Boise State University Thursday, June 1, 2000 8:30 a.m. Morning Session Keynote Speakers: John A. Kitzhaber, M.D. Governor of Oregon Marc Racicot Governor of Oregon GOVERNOR CECIL D. ANDRUS: Good morning and are all free to speak their minds, and we hope we can give welcome to our Year 2000 meeting where we will discuss direction to the next president and his cabinet in order to policies after politics. My name is Cecil Andrus, Chairman of have a voice from the western United States. the Andrus Center for Public Policy at Boise State University. There is a difference of opinion on the management of We have many distinguished guests here with us today. I’d public lands, but the first thing we have to remember is that like to welcome all of my gubernatorial friends from present the public, not the federal government, owns the land. The and past and tell you how much I appreciate your willingness federal government manages those lands for the public, and to be here with us today. we have a strong difference of opinion throughout the United A couple of announcements. I’d like to introduce Dr. John States and the western United States as to how certain areas Freemuth. John is a tenured professor at Boise State of the land should be managed. There is a strong difference University. He is also a senior fellow at the Andrus Center for of opinion within this room. Public Policy, is active in the political science field and in What we hope and expect and what we’re going to demand natural resources, and is a good person for you to know. is a voice in the process that creates the methodology by Our luncheon speaker is Jay Shelledy. He’ll be introduced which the public lands will be managed. We hope it will not later and will be a stimulating speaker. Your credentials get be a top-down process but a bottom-up decision process. you into the luncheon and anything else that we have going None of us will win all the battles we want to win, but our on. goal is to have a voice in the solutions. Now briefly, the purpose of this symposium and the reason At the end of today’s session, we will then put together a we entitled it “Policy after Politics.” Politics dominates white paper. You’ll all receive that. After that, I will see that everything in this election year for the presidency of the it is delivered to the next president of the United States, and United States. We have no idea which one of the major it will be distributed, we hope, to those potential candidates candidates will be elected, but here’s what we’re trying to for cabinet posts and others who will have a voice in the do. Some of us feel that the west and certainly some of the management of the public lands. So that’s what we’re here resource areas are ignored. The candidates for the presidency for today. of the United States have a tendency to fly over us and look I do not believe that between now and November you’re down on their way to Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco going to see much of a change in attitude or situation because where the people and the votes are. They don’t pay much politics dominates. The group today is not non-partisan, but attention to the Rocky Mountain West. We’ve seen evidence it is bi-partisan. We hope we can come up with some of the of that in both political parties. answers. This symposium is comprised of current governors—both I see, as I sit here and look over the audience, members of of whom are serving their last terms as governors—and former the Legislature of this state, of Oregon and of Nevada, and governors, who tell me they have no desire to run again, many others are here as well. I welcome you and thank you particularly in the political environment we have today.
Recommended publications
  • Matt Rosendale/Nrsc – Choice Fact Check

    Matt Rosendale/Nrsc – Choice Fact Check

    MATT ROSENDALE/NRSC – CHOICE FACT CHECK OVERVIEW • Jon Tester, as Ranking Member of the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee, has been a leader in working with the Trump Administration to secure our borders, and has fought tirelessly throughout his career to put more boots on the ground and deploy technology to secure the Northern and Southern borders. • Matt Rosendale has repeatedly opposed efforts to keep Montanans safe – he was called out by the Billings Gazette for being one of only seven state senators to vote against legislation to toughen penalties for human trafficking, voted against creating a permanent sexual assault prosecution office in the Montana Department of Justice, and voted against funding a service to notify victims or sex crimes when their attacker was released from prison. • Matt Rosendale is a multimillionaire East Cost real estate developer who moved to Montana after buying a $2 million trophy ranch that he doesn’t even ranch himself; he’s a political opportunist who has run for 5 offices in 8 years and who started his campaign with a “pants on fire” lie about Jon Tester’s record. Rosendale was hand- picked by Washington insiders and special interests; his campaign has been propped up by millions in dark money outside spending – he’ll do their bidding, not what’s best for Montana. CLAIM FACTS V/O: There's a JON TESTER HAS BEEN A LEADER IN EFFORTS TO WORK WITH THE TRUMP choice on ADMINISTRATION TO STRENGTHEN OUR BORDER SECURITY immigration. HEADLINE: “Tester Joins Bipartisan Group Working On Border Security Deal.” [MTPR, ON SCREEN: 1/24/18] THERE IS A CHOICE ON CNN: Jon Tester “Was One Of A Handful” Of Senators To Meet With Trump IMMIGRATION Administration Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen On Immigration Reform Negotiations.
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
  • Congressional Record—Senate S1323

    Congressional Record—Senate S1323

    February 13, 2019 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S1323 they were shunned and denied their agement, and guidance have been in- logical breakthroughs. As chairman of rightful hero’s welcome. We must vow strumental in helping current and fu- the Senate Committee on Small Busi- to never let this happen again and to ture leaders in our great State get a ness and Entrepreneurship, each week I always honor those who serve in our start. Thank you for you your leader- recognize a small business that em- Armed Forces. Let this flight be a re- ship, friendship, humor, and extraor- bodies the unique American entrepre- minder that we can all do our part to dinary service to our State and Na- neurial spirit. This week, it is my dis- keep the sacred trust we have with our tion.∑ tinct privilege to honor JL Marine Sys- veterans. Let it be a reminder that f tems, Inc., as the Senate Small Busi- there is still more work to do to honor ness of the Week. REMEMBERING BILL BURGESS their service, and let us be inspired by Located in Tampa, FL, JL Marine their selfless and heroic service to a ∑ Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, I am Systems is known in fishing commu- grateful nation. here to speak today with a heavy heart nities throughout the country as the I am honored to recognize the very from the sudden and untimely passing manufacturer of the Power-Pole shal- first Wisconsin Honor Flight to Viet- of my dear friend and confidant, Bill low water anchor. John Oliverio, the nam and I commend Old Glory Honor Burgess of Lawton, OK.
  • The Oregon Benchmark Experience

    The Oregon Benchmark Experience

    ACHIEVING BETTER HEALTH OUTCOMES: The Oregon Benchmark Experience Howard M. Leichter and Jeffrey Tryens (To request a bound copy of this report, click here. To see a complete list of Milbank reports, click here. When ordering, be sure to specify which report you want, your name, mailing address, and phone number.) Table of Contents Foreword Acknowledgments Executive Summary Introduction Measuring Progress Benefits of the Oregon Approach A Short History of Oregon Shines and the Benchmarks High Hopes Disillusionment Rebuilding Using the Benchmarks State Agency Budgets and Management Benchmarks as Bridges Summing Up A Tale of Three Benchmarks Childhood Immunizations Early Prenatal Care Teen Pregnancy in Tillamook County The Benchmark Experience in Other States Learning From Oregon Oregon's Evolving System Improving the Oregon Model Conclusion Appendixes A. Benchmark Programs in Six Other States B. Oregon Progress Board Publications Notes References Foreword The development and publication of statistical indicators of the health status and well-being of populations has been increasing in the United States and internationally. These indicators still have less influence on health policy than the publication of data about leading economic indicators has on business decisions. However, indicators of health status are attracting attention among officials at all levels of government as well as among private-sector executives making decisions about such issues as where to locate or relocate operations. The state of Oregon in 1989 began to devise indicators of well-being, calling them benchmarks, as part of a long- term project to improve the economy of the state initiated by then-governor Neil Goldschmidt. The Oregon Progress Board (OPB), a public body whose members are leaders of the community, business, and government, manages the benchmarking process.
  • Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8

    Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8

    CONTENTS Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8 JULY 15, 1974 Vol. X, No. 14 50 CENTS POLITICS: REPORTS islation, but the implementation now under way of the new law's rules is still a controversial topic. COLORADO Daniels, a Denver businessman and part-owner of the Utah Stars basket­ Furthermore, there is some danger ball team, has drawn the bulk of his that the burning issue of the upcoming In only six states this year, incum­ support from state and Denver party Denver congressional race may spill bent governors will face or have faced leaders. Competition between the two over into state politics. A bitter fight serious primary challenges. GOP aspirants perhaps peaked in is expected between U.S. Rep. Patricia In South Dakota and Texas, respec­ Denver June 1 when delegates to the Schroeder (D) and State Rep. Frank tively, Democratic incumbents annihi­ state assembly were chosen. Daniels Southworth. Southworth, president of lated more liberal challengers with sur­ needed a strong showing from his the Denver Board of Education, is an prising ease. In Florida, Gov. Reubin Denver supporters but failed to get outspoken opponent of school busing Askew (D) is expected to have the it. In the pre-meeting acrimony, Den­ and is expected to make it his major same success, but in Oklahoma, the ver GOP Chairman James Aspinal, a issue. The publicity given busing could politi~allife expectancy of Gov. David Daniels backer, denied Denver GOP conceivably complicate the state guber­ Hall (D), embattled by investigations Secretary Mary Hofstra, a Vanderhoof natorial race as well.
  • University News, April 9 Students of Boise State University

    University News, April 9 Students of Boise State University

    Boise State University ScholarWorks Student Newspapers (UP 4.15) University Documents 4-9-1990 University News, April 9 Students of Boise State University Although this file was scanned from the highest-quality microfilm held by Boise State University, it reveals the limitations of the source microfilm. It is possible to perform a text search of much of this material; however, there are sections where the source microfilm was too faint or unreadable to allow for text scanning. For assistance with this collection of student newspapers, please contact Special Collections and Archives at [email protected]. 3 14 18 The scoop on Visit the International An informal chat with candidates for the Song, Food and l the.fiveASBSU presi- ASBSUsenate race Dance Festival dential tickets. -the ( ~ . - --. --.- -. ...... ... Il.NI\T~RSI'"f"·........... - .-.- -. -- -....-. '-- -- -- _.NF.W.S- - -..'- - - Boise State University Volume X 'Issue Twenty-Two Blind student finds her niche in h.orficulture . Debbie Robertson, a BSU fornia, Oklahoma, Washington horticulture student, was named andldaho. MostofRobertson's a "Student of the Month .. in schooling was self-taught be- February by the Mayor's Com- cause she said many of her milteeonEmploying theHaIidi-, teachers were not trained to capped and Older Worker. instruct a student who was visu- Robertson, who was declared ally. impaired. legal Iyblind at age 8,received a Although she dropped out plaque Trom Mayor Dirk of school after eighth grade, Kernpthorne during a luncheon Robertson went on to receive ceremony. her General Education Diploma Robertson, who is the first (GED) at age 16afteraltending blind student to attend the hor- a self-motivated program at the ticulture program, enrolled at Eastern Idaho Vo-Tech Learn- BSU in Sept.
  • AGENDA Time Page 5:30 P.M

    AGENDA Time Page 5:30 P.M

    Public notice was given to The Register-Guard for publication on October 10, 2018. LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, October 17, 2018 5:30 p.m. 3500 E. 17th Avenue, Eugene (in Glenwood) AGENDA Time Page 5:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 5:31 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Vacant Yett Wildish Yeh Reid Necker Nordin 5:32 p.m. III. PRELIMINARY REMARKS BY BOARD PRESIDENT 5:34 p.m. IV. COMMENTS FROM THE GENERAL MANAGER This agenda item provides an opportunity for the general manager to formally communicate with the Board on any current topics or items that may need consideration. 5:36 p.m. V. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO AGENDA This agenda item provides a formal opportunity for the Board president to announce additions to the agenda, and also for Board members to make announcements. 5:38 p.m. VI. BOARD CALENDAR Board members are asked to coordinate the Board Activity Calendars with their personal calendars for discussion at each Board meeting. Board members are also asked to contact the Clerk of the Board with any changes in availability for LTD-related meetings and events, and to provide their vacation dates. 5:40 p.m. VII. EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH – NOVEMBER 4 5:45 p.m. VIII. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION ♦ Public Comment Note: This part of the agenda is reserved for members of the public to address the Board on any issue. The person speaking is requested to sign-in on the Audience Participation form, for submittal to the Clerk of the Board.
  • Idaho Office of Lt

    Idaho Office of Lt

    Idaho Office of Lt. Governor Data Sheet As of July 21, 2016 History of Office The Office of the Lt. Governor of Idaho was created in 1890.1 Origins of the Office The Office of the Lt. Governor of Idaho was established in the Constitution of 1890 with statehood.2 Qualifications for Office The Council of State Governments (CSG) publishes the Book of the States (BOS) 2015. In chapter 4, Table 4.13 lists the Qualifications and Terms of Office for lieutenant governors: The Book of the States 2015 (CSG) at www.csg.org. Method of Election The National Lieutenant Governors Association (NLGA) maintains a list of the methods of electing gubernatorial successors at: http://www.nlga.us/lt-governors/office-of-lieutenant- governor/methods-of-election/. Duties and Powers A lieutenant governor may derive responsibilities one of four ways: from the Constitution, from the Legislature through statute, from the governor (thru gubernatorial appointment or executive order), thru personal initiative in office, and/or a combination of these. The principal and shared constitutional responsibility of every gubernatorial successor is to be the first official in the line of succession to the governor’s office. Succession to Office of Governor In 1890, Governor George L. Shoup resigned to take an elected seat in the U.S. Senate and Lt. Governor N. B. Willey served as Governor for the remainder of the term. In 1945, Governor Charles C. Gossett resigned to let Lt. Governor Arnold Williams succeed to Governor, who then appointed Gossett to the U.S. Senate. 3 In 1977, Governor Cecil D.
  • Voters' Pamphlet May 21 2002 Primary Election Nonpartisan Candidates

    Voters' Pamphlet May 21 2002 Primary Election Nonpartisan Candidates

    Oregon Secretary of State 2002 Voters’ Pamphlet | May 21, 2002 Primary Election (Nonpartisan Candidates) Dear Oregonian As Oregon's Secretary of State, one of my most important goals is to make sure that every Oregonian has the opportunity to register and to vote. Your vote is your voice. Voting gives each individual the power to make decisions about who leads our state and what laws are passed - and I am working hard to provide every Oregonian with the information and inspiration they need to exercise their precious right to vote. The Voters' Pamphlet is the most direct and complete source of information on candidates and issues in our state. I encourage you to use this document as a resource to help you make thoughtful, informed decisions as you vote. Remember: the ballot you cast in May will affect all of our lives and the future of our state. The May 2002 election will be Oregon's second statewide primary conducted entirely by mail. Two years ago, a total of over 900,000 Oregonians cast ballots in the first vote-by-mail Primary. The high turnout during the 2000 Primary reversed a steady twenty-year decline in the number of Oregonians casting Primary Election ballots. In fact, it represented a 16 percent increase over the highest number of votes ever cast in a polling place Primary Election. This year, I challenge Oregon to do even better. The nation is experiencing a disturbing decline in voter participation, particularly among young people. We stand the risk of losing a whole generation of voters.
  • Rr714 Sk.Indd

    Rr714 Sk.Indd

    Research Report Report Number 714, June 2013 Sagebrush Rebellion Part II Analysis of the public lands debate in utah HIGHLIGHTS The federal government owns around 635 million acres, 1 Nearly 67% of the land in Utah is owned by the or 28% of the land comprising the United States. Within federal government, the fourth highest among all 50 states. Utah, nearly 67% of the state’s total acreage, or 35 million The Legislature passed the Transfer of Public Lands Act (TPLA) in 2012, which demands the acres, is owned by the federal government. Throughout the federal government transfer nearly 20 million acres of land by 2015. nation’s history, groups have debated who should control Supporters of the TPLA argue that when Utah became a state, the federal government this land and how it should be managed. In 2012, the promised to “extinguish title” to all federal lands within a timely manner. Because it hasn’t, it has Utah State Legislature passed H.B. 148, which demands put the state at an economic disadvantage, has hurt education funding, and manages the land the United States transfer their title to public lands to the ineffi ciently. State of Utah before December 31, 2014. Opponents of the TPLA argue that Utah agreed to “forever disclaim” all public lands when it Th is research report will explain the history of public lands in the U.S. and Utah, past became a state. They posit that the state was brought into the union under equal footing, there eff orts to transfer the land to state control, the arguments for and against keeping the are economic benefi ts to federal control of the lands under federal ownership, and assess the merits and faults of each argument.
  • THE SURGEON GENERAL and the BULLY PULPIT Michael Stobbe a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of North Carol

    THE SURGEON GENERAL and the BULLY PULPIT Michael Stobbe a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of North Carol

    THE SURGEON GENERAL AND THE BULLY PULPIT Michael Stobbe A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Public Health in the Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Ned Brooks Jonathan Oberlander Tom Ricketts Karl Stark Bryan Weiner ABSTRACT MIKE STOBBE: The Surgeon General and the Bully Pulpit (Under the direction of Ned Brooks) This project looks at the role of the U.S. Surgeon General in influencing public opinion and public health policy. I examined historical changes in the administrative powers of the Surgeon General, to explain what factors affect how a Surgeon General utilizes the office’s “bully pulpit,” and assess changes in the political environment and in who oversees the Surgeon General that may affect the Surgeon General’s future ability to influence public opinion and health. This research involved collecting and analyzing the opinions of journalists and key informants such as current and former government health officials. I also studied public documents, transcripts of earlier interviews and other materials. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................v Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 Background/Overview .........................................................................................1
  • Www. George Wbush.Com

    Www. George Wbush.Com

    Post Office Box 10648 Arlington, VA 2221 0 Phone. 703-647-2700 Fax: 703-647-2993 www. George WBush.com October 27,2004 , . a VIA FACSIMILE (202-219-3923) AND CERTIFIED MAIL == c3 F Federal Election Commission 999 E Street NW Washington, DC 20463 b ATTN: Office of General Counsel e r\, Re: MUR3525 Dear Federal Election Commission: On behalf of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney as candidates for federal office, Karl Rove, David Herndon and Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc., this letter responds to the allegations contained in the complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission (the “Commission”) by Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc. The Kerry Campaign’s complaint alleges that Bush-Cheney 2004 and fourteen other individuals and organizations violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 197 1, as amended (2 U.S.C. $ 431 et seq.) (“the Act”). Specifically, the Kerry Campaign alleges that individuals and organizations named in the complaint illegally coordinated with one another to produce and air advertising about Senator. Kerry’s military service. 1 Considering that no entity by the name of Bush-Cheney 2004 appears to exist, 1’ Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc. (“Bush Campaign”) presumes that the Kerry Campaign mistakenly filed its complaint against a non-existent entity and actually intended to file against the Bush Campaign. Assuming that the foregoing presumption is correct; the Bush Campaign, on behalf of itself and President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Karl Rove, David Herndon (the “Parties”), responds as follows: Response to Allegations Against President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B.