And D2-Dopaminergic Receptors in the Primate Cerebral Cortex

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And D2-Dopaminergic Receptors in the Primate Cerebral Cortex Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 4353-4356, May 1994 Neurobiology A common action of clozapine, haloperidol, and remoxipride on D1- and D2-dopaminergic receptors in the primate cerebral cortex (neuroleptic drugs/schizophrenia/asociatlon cortex/receptor autoradiography/receptor regulation) MICHAEL S. LIDOW AND PATRICIA S. GOLDMAN-RAKIC Section of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 Contributed by Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic, January 24, 1994 ABSTRACT The potencies of the major neuroleptics used for 6 months to approximate the maintenance of medication in the treatment of schizophrenia, including haloperidol and in clinical practice (14). A control group (group CO) received remoxipride, correlate with their ability to bind D2-dopa- only fruit treats. Five days after final administration ofdrugs, minergic receptors in subcortical structures. On the other the animals were sacrificed, and cortical dopamine receptors hand, the neuroleptic clozapine has a low affinity for these sites, were assayed by quantitative receptor autoradiography. The and the pharmacological basis of its beneficial action is less cortical regions examined are shown in Fig. 1A. They include clear. We have found that chronic treatment with clozapine, prefrontal association [cytoarchitectonic areas 46 and 9 of haloperidol, and remoxipride up-regulates D2 receptors in Walker (15)], temporal association [area 21 of Brodmann specific cortical areas of the rhesus monkey frontal, parietal, (16)], primary motor [area 4 of Brodmann (16)], somatosen- temporal, and occipital lobes. Of particular interest, all three sory [areas 1, 2, and 3 of Brodmann (16)], and primary visual neuroleptics down-regulated D1 receptors in prefrontal and [area 17 of Brodmann (16)] cortex. temporal association regions-the two areas most often asso- Dj-dopaminergic sites were labeled with the antagonist ciated with schizophrenia. This latter finding raises the possi- [3H]SCH23390 (17, 18). An example of [3H]SCH23390 bind- bility that down-regulation of D1 receptors in prefrontal and ing in the prefrontal cortex is shown in Fig. 1B. Tissue temporal cortex may be an important component of the ther- sections were first preincubated for 20 min at room temper- apeutic response to neuroleptic drugs. Further, the common ature in 50 mM Tris'HCl buffer, pH 7.4. They were then effects of three neuroleptics with different pharmacological incubated with 0.1-10 nM [3H]SCH23390 for 90 min at room profiles in the cerebral cortex is consistent with the idea that temperature in 50 mM Tris HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 120 this structure is a major therapeutic target in the treatment of mM NaCl, 5 mM KC1, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 pM schizophrenia. mianserin. The latter was added to block binding to 5-HT2, 5-HTic, and a2 sites. After incubation, the tissue was rinsed twice (10 min each) in ice-cold 50 mM Tris HCl buffer, pH The therapeutic effect of neuroleptics has generally been 7.4. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of associated with their binding to the D2 class of dopaminergic 1 jmM cis-flupentixol. receptors in the brain (1). However, the beneficial actions of D2-dopaminergic receptors, illustrated in the prefrontal clozapine have not been satisfactorily explained, given that cortex (Fig. 1C), were labeled with the antagonist [1251]epi- this drug does not interact with D2 sites in most regions depride (18). Sections were preincubated as described for examined (2, 3). Numerous previous studies of the effects of [3H]SCH23390 binding and then incubated for 45 min at room prolonged neuroleptic treatment on dopaminergic receptors temperature with 0.1-3.0 nM [1251]-epidepride in 50 mM have focused on subcortical structures (3-8), while the Tris HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM regulation of cerebral cortical dopaminergic sites by similar KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% ascorbic acid, and 0.2 treatment has received little attention. Such data are partic- ,uM idazoxan to prevent labeling of a2 sites. After incuba- ularly important in view of the mounting evidence for the tion, the sections were rinsed as described for [3H]SCH23390 involvement of the cortical dopaminergic system in schizo- binding. Nonspecific labeling was determined in the presence phrenia (for reviews see refs. 9 and 10). To gain further insight of 10 AuM (+)-butaclamol. into the mechanism of action of clozapine, we compared its At the end of the labeling assays, all tissue sections were effect on dopamine receptors in the cerebral cortex ofrhesus dipped in distilled water and apposed to 3H-sensitive Ultro- monkeys with those of two representative neuroleptics, film (Amersham) for 6 weeks ([3H]SCH23390) or 1 week haloperidol and remoxipride. Both of these drugs display a ([125I]epidepride). After development for autoradiography, high affinity for the D2-dopaminergic receptor sites in the the tissue sections were stained with cresyl violet to allow neostriatum and nucleus accumbens, though remoxipride is analysis of the cytoarchitecture. For all animals, binding more selective (11). assays were repeated twice. At least five tissue sections were processed for every concentration of ligand, three for total AND binding and two for nonspecific binding. MATERIALS METHODS The autoradiograms were analyzed with a BDS computer Sixteen rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), 5-7 years ofage, system (Biological Detection Systems, Pittsburgh; ref. 17) and were divided into four groups ofequal size. Group H received the statistical analysis of saturation binding was performed haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg per day), group C1 received clozapine with the nonlinear curve-fitting computer programs KINETIC/ (5.2 mg/kg per day), and group R received remoxipride (3.7 EDBA/LIGAND/LOWRY from Elsevier-Biosoft (Cambridge, mg/kg per day). These doses fall within the recommended U.K.). The analysis is based on specific radiolabeling in tissue range for therapeutic effects in schizophrenic patients (12, exposed to seven different concentrations of radioactive li- 13). The drugs were given orally (in fruit treats) twice a day gand in incubating solutions. This number of data points is sufficient to allow a relatively accurate estimation of B.. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge (maximal binding) and Kd (steady-state dissociation constant) payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" values for a one-site receptor model (17). Examples of satu- in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. ration and Scatchard plots of [3H]SCH23390 and [125I]_ 4353 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 4354 Neurobiology: Lidow and Goldman-Rakic Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 91 (1994) A 0 total nonspecifc A X0 48 ° ° 36 N E 24_ 12 18 Bound (fmol/mg prot.) 0 3 6 9 I3HISCH23390 free(nM) B 3.2 ° §.z 2.4- FIG. 1. (A) Diagram of the lateral surface of the rhesus monkey 0 00 cerebral cortex. Different patterns indicate the cortical areas exam- ined in the present study. The plane of section for the slices shown w0 0.9 1.8 2.7 in B and C is indicated by the line. (B) Color-coded autoradiogram %. s~~~~~~ound (final/mg prot.) showing the laminar distribution of [3H]SCH23390 binding in the Ur presence of mianserin (Dj-dopaminergic receptors) in a coronal section from the prefrontal cortex of an untreated rhesus monkey. o~~~.2 0.4 (C) Color-coded autoradiogram of [125I]epidepride labeling in the [1251epidepride free (nM) presence of idazoxan (D2-dopaminergic sites) in cortical section similar to that shown in B. Note that the [3H]SCH23390 binding is densest in layers I, II, MIla, V, and VI, while [125I]epidepride binding FIG. 2. Examples of saturation binding of [3H]SCH23390 (A) and is prominent in layer V. Red coloring indicates the highest density of [125I]epidepride (B) in the area 46 of neuroleptic naive monkey. In binding; black indicates the lowest density of binding. PS, principal each assay, consecutive brain sections were labeled with seven sulcus. concentrations of the radioligand as described in the text. Sections were then apposed to 3H-sensitive Ultrofilm and autoradiograms were generated. Nonspecific labeling for [3H]SCH23390 was defined epidepride are presented in Fig. 2. values for control and Bm.. in the presence of 1 ,uM cis-flupentixol and for [125I]epidepride in the groups were with two-tailed each of the treated compared presence of 10 pM (+)-butaclamol. For each concentration of the Student t tests. The effects of neuroleptic treatments on Kd radioligand, the total binding was obtained from three consecutive values were evaluated with a one-way ANOVA. brain sections, with the fourth and fifth sections providing nonspe- cific binding. Insets represent the corresponding Scatchard plots. These plots yielded Kd = 0.14 nM andB. = 38.6 fmol/mg ofprotein RESULTS AND DISCUSSION for [3H]SCH23390 and Kd = 0.029 nM and Bm..c = 2.94 fmol/mg of Saturation analysis of[1251]epidepride binding showed that all protein for [125I]epidepride. three neuroleptics produced statistically significant increases density were accompanied by changes in the affinity for (47-52%) in the density of D2-dopaminergic receptor sites in [1251]epidepride (Table 1). Our findings with haloperidol and all layers of the temporal association, primary motor, sOma- remoxipride are in line with the widely reported D2 up- tosensory, and primary visual cortical regions (Fig. 3A). D2 regulation by these drugs in subcortical structures (3-7). receptor sites were also increased in the prefrontal cortex but However, the up-regulation of cortical D2 receptors by by a smaller percentage (11-18%) which did not reach sta- clozapine in widespread areas of the cerebral cortex differs tistical significance (Fig. 3A). None ofthe changes in receptor from the apparent lack of such effect of clozapine on these Table 1.
Recommended publications
  • 2D6 Substrates 2D6 Inhibitors 2D6 Inducers
    Physician Guidelines: Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P450’s 1 2D6 Substrates Acetaminophen Captopril Dextroamphetamine Fluphenazine Methoxyphenamine Paroxetine Tacrine Ajmaline Carteolol Dextromethorphan Fluvoxamine Metoclopramide Perhexiline Tamoxifen Alprenolol Carvedilol Diazinon Galantamine Metoprolol Perphenazine Tamsulosin Amiflamine Cevimeline Dihydrocodeine Guanoxan Mexiletine Phenacetin Thioridazine Amitriptyline Chloropromazine Diltiazem Haloperidol Mianserin Phenformin Timolol Amphetamine Chlorpheniramine Diprafenone Hydrocodone Minaprine Procainamide Tolterodine Amprenavir Chlorpyrifos Dolasetron Ibogaine Mirtazapine Promethazine Tradodone Aprindine Cinnarizine Donepezil Iloperidone Nefazodone Propafenone Tramadol Aripiprazole Citalopram Doxepin Imipramine Nifedipine Propranolol Trimipramine Atomoxetine Clomipramine Encainide Indoramin Nisoldipine Quanoxan Tropisetron Benztropine Clozapine Ethylmorphine Lidocaine Norcodeine Quetiapine Venlafaxine Bisoprolol Codeine Ezlopitant Loratidine Nortriptyline Ranitidine Verapamil Brofaramine Debrisoquine Flecainide Maprotline olanzapine Remoxipride Zotepine Bufuralol Delavirdine Flunarizine Mequitazine Ondansetron Risperidone Zuclopenthixol Bunitrolol Desipramine Fluoxetine Methadone Oxycodone Sertraline Butylamphetamine Dexfenfluramine Fluperlapine Methamphetamine Parathion Sparteine 2D6 Inhibitors Ajmaline Chlorpromazine Diphenhydramine Indinavir Mibefradil Pimozide Terfenadine Amiodarone Cimetidine Doxorubicin Lasoprazole Moclobemide Quinidine Thioridazine Amitriptyline Cisapride
    [Show full text]
  • Antipsychotics
    The Fut ure of Antipsychotic Therapy (page 7 in syllabus) Stepp,,hen M. Stahl, MD, PhD Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry Universityyg of California, San Diego School of Medicine Honorary Visiting Senior Fellow, Cambridge University, UK Sppyonsored by the Neuroscience Education Institute Additionally sponsored by the American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy This activity is supported by an educational grant from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Copyright © 2011 Neuroscience Education Institute. All rights reserved. Individual Disclosure Statement Faculty Editor / Presenter Stephen M. Stahl, MD, PhD, is an adjunct professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, and an honorary visiting senior fellow at the University of Cambridge in the UK. Grant/Research: AstraZeneca, BioMarin, Dainippon Sumitomo, Dey, Forest, Genomind, Lilly, Merck, Pamlab, Pfizer, PGxHealth/Trovis, Schering-Plough, Sepracor/Sunovion, Servier, Shire, Torrent Consultant/Advisor: Advent, Alkermes, Arena, AstraZeneca, AVANIR, BioMarin, Biovail, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CeNeRx, Cypress, Dainippon Sumitomo, Dey, Forest, Genomind, Janssen, Jazz, Labopharm, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neuronetics, Novartis, Ono, Orexigen, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, PGxHealth/Trovis, Rexahn, Roche, Royalty, Schering-Plough, Servier, Shire, Solvay/Abbott, Sunovion/Sepracor, Valeant, VIVUS, Speakers Bureau: Dainippon Sumitomo, Forest, Lilly, Merck, Pamlab, Pfizer, Sepracor/Sunovion, Servier, Wyeth Copyright © 2011 Neuroscience Education Institute. All rights reserved. Learninggj Objectives • Differentiate antipsychotic drugs from each other on the basis of their pharmacological mechanisms and their associated therapeutic and side effects • Integrate novel treatment approaches into clinical practice according to best practices guidelines • Identify novel therapeutic options currently being researched for the treatment of schizophrenia Copyright © 2011 Neuroscience Education Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dose-Concentration-Effect Relationships—The Basis for TDM. a Critical Appraisal Lars F
    International Congress Series 1220 (2001) 117-123 The dose-concentration-effect relationships—the basis for TDM. A critical appraisal Lars F. Gram Institute of Public Health, Research Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark—Odense University, Odense, Denmark Abstract Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) is based on a series of theoretical assumptions, a clinical pharmacological rationale, scientific documentation and a practical implementation, respecting the theoretical and scientific basis. The clinical pharmacological rationale for TDM; a pharmacokinetic variability exceeding therapeutic index and dose titration on the basis of clinical or paraclinical measurements not being feasible, limits TDM to a minor fraction of all drags available. The theoretical assumption that blood concentration measurements reflect/predict the tissue/receptor concentration and the clinical endpoints, requires several points to be considered such as concentration fluctuations, protein binding, active metabolites, etc. A relatively constant ratio between blood and tissue/receptor concentration is generally assumed, but the important role of transporter proteins, with inter- and intraindividual variability due to polymorphisms, inducers and inhibitors seriously challenge this basic assumption. Concentration—effect relationships concerns groups of patients and indicate the probability of a given response (therapeutic/toxic) at a given concentration. Dose-effect and concentration-effect studies of drugs like digoxin, lithium and antidepressants have shown that the dose-effect or concentration-effect curves for therapeutic effect and tolerability are flat and overlapping. Dose-effect studies, now standard in drag development, represent a unique possibility to examine dose—concentration-effect relationships of new drags. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Therapeutic Drag Monitoring; Dose; Concentration; Effect E-mail address: [email protected] (L.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Search Strategies
    Appendix 1: electronic search strategies The following search strategy will be applied in PubMed: ("Antipsychotic Agents"[Mesh] OR acepromazine OR acetophenazine OR amisulpride OR aripiprazole OR asenapine OR benperidol OR bromperidol OR butaperazine OR Chlorpromazine OR chlorproethazine OR chlorprothixene OR clopenthixol OR clotiapine OR clozapine OR cyamemazine OR dixyrazine OR droperidol OR fluanisone OR flupentixol OR fluphenazine OR fluspirilene OR haloperidol OR iloperidone OR levomepromazine OR levosulpiride OR loxapine OR lurasidone OR melperone OR mesoridazine OR molindone OR moperone OR mosapramine OR olanzapine OR oxypertine OR paliperidone OR penfluridol OR perazine OR periciazine OR perphenazine OR pimozide OR pipamperone OR pipotiazine OR prochlorperazine OR promazine OR prothipendyl OR quetiapine OR remoxipride OR risperidone OR sertindole OR sulpiride OR sultopride OR tiapride OR thiopropazate OR thioproperazine OR thioridazine OR tiotixene OR trifluoperazine OR trifluperidol OR triflupromazine OR veralipride OR ziprasidone OR zotepine OR zuclopenthixol ) AND ("Randomized Controlled Trial"[ptyp] OR "Controlled Clinical Trial"[ptyp] OR "Multicenter Study"[ptyp] OR "randomized"[tiab] OR "randomised"[tiab] OR "placebo"[tiab] OR "randomly"[tiab] OR "trial"[tiab] OR controlled[ti] OR randomized controlled trials[mh] OR random allocation[mh] OR double-blind method[mh] OR single-blind method[mh] OR "Clinical Trial"[Ptyp] OR "Clinical Trials as Topic"[Mesh]) AND (((Schizo*[tiab] OR Psychosis[tiab] OR psychoses[tiab] OR psychotic[tiab] OR disturbed[tiab] OR paranoid[tiab] OR paranoia[tiab]) AND ((Child*[ti] OR Paediatric[ti] OR Pediatric[ti] OR Juvenile[ti] OR Youth[ti] OR Young[ti] OR Adolesc*[ti] OR Teenage*[ti] OR early*[ti] OR kids[ti] OR infant*[ti] OR toddler*[ti] OR boys[ti] OR girls[ti] OR "Child"[Mesh]) OR "Infant"[Mesh])) OR ("Schizophrenia, Childhood"[Mesh])).
    [Show full text]
  • Tardive Akathisia
    HEALTH & SAFETY: PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATIONS Tardive Akathisia FACT SHEET Tardive Akathisia BQIS Fact Sheets provide a general overview on topics important to supporting an individual’s health and safety and to improving their quality of life. This document provides general information on the topic and is not intended to replace team assessment, decision-making, or medical advice. This is the ninth of ten Fact Sheets regarding psychotropic medications. Intended Outcomes Individuals will understand the symptoms, common causes, and treatment of tardive akathisia. Definitions Akathisia: A movement disorder characterized by motor restlessness/a feeling of inner restlessness with a compelling need to be moving. Tardive akathisia: A severe prolonged form of akathisia which may persist after stopping the medica- tion causing the symptoms. Facts • Akathisia is: – the most common drug induced movement disorder. – a side effect of medication. – most often caused by antipsychotic medications that block dopamine. • Medications with akathisia as a potential side effect include: – Benzisothiazole (ziprasidone) – Benzisoxazole (iloperidone) – Butyrophenones (haloperidol, droperidol) – Calcium channel blockers (flunarizine, cinnarizine) – Dibenzazepine (loxapine, asenapine) – Dibenzodiazepine (clozapine, quetiapine) – Diphenylbutylpiperidine (pimozide) – Indolones (molindone) – Lithium – Phenothiazines (chlorpromazine, triflupromazine, thioridazine, mesoridazine, trifluoperazine, prochlorperazine, perphenazine, fluphenazine, perazine) Bureau of Quality Improvement
    [Show full text]
  • Dopamine Receptor Contribution to the Action of PCP, LSD and Ketamine
    Molecular Psychiatry (2005) 10, 877–883 & 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1359-4184/05 $30.00 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Dopamine receptor contribution to the action of PCP, LSD and ketamine psychotomimetics P Seeman1,2,FKo1 and T Tallerico2 1Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Although phencyclidine and ketamine are used to model a hypoglutamate theory of schizophrenia, their selectivity for NMDA receptors has been questioned. To determine the affinities of phencyclidine, ketamine, dizocilpine and LSD for the functional high-affinity state High of the dopamine D2 receptor, D2 , their dissociation constants (Ki) were obtained on [3H]domperidone binding to human cloned dopamine D2 receptors. Phencyclidine had a high High affinity for D2 with a Ki of 2.7 nM, in contrast to its low affinity for the NMDA receptor, with a 3 Ki of 313 nM, as labeled by [ H]dizocilpine on rat striatal tissue. Ketamine also had a high High affinity for D2 with a Ki of 55 nM, an affinity higher than its 3100 nM Ki for the NMDA sites. High Dizocilpine had a Ki of 0.3 nM at D2 , but a Kd of 1.8 nM at the NMDA receptor. LSD had a Ki of 2nMatD2High. Because the psychotomimetics had higher potency at D2High than at the NMDA site, the psychotomimetic action of these drugs must have a major contribution from D2 agonism. Because these drugs have a combined action on both dopamine receptors and NMDA receptors, these drugs, when given in vivo, test a combined hyperdopamine and hypoglutamate theory of psychosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous System Drug Poster
    Nervous System Drugs Created by the Njardarson Group (The University of Arizona): Edon Vitaku, Elizabeth A. Ilardi, Daniel J. Mack, Monica A. Fallon, Erik B. Gerlach, Miyant’e Y. Newton, Angela N. Yazzie, Jack Siqueiros, Jón T. Njarðarson Cocaine Aspirin Caffeine Procaine Benzocaine Metharbital Oxycodone Disulfiram Morphine Ergotamine Hydromorphone Codeine Pemoline Amphetamine Thiopental Methadone Methadone Biperiden Thiopental D.H.E. Trimethadione Urecholine Cafergot ( Cocaine ) ( Aspirin ) ( Caffeine ) ( Procaine ) ( Benzocaine ) ( Metharbital ) ( Oxycodone ) ( Disulfiram ) ( Morphine ) ( Ergotamine ) ( Hydromorphone ) ( Codeine ) ( Pemoline ) ( Amphetamine ) ( Thiopental ) ( Methadone ) ( Methadone ) ( Biperiden ) ( Thiopental ) ( Dihydroergotamine ) ( Trimethadione ) ( Bethanechol ) ( Ergotamine & Caffeine ) ANESTHETIC ANALGESIC PSYCHOANALEPTIC ANESTHETIC ANESTHETIC ANTIEPILEPTIC ANALGESIC MISC. NERVOUS ANALGESIC ANALGESIC ANALGESIC ANALGESIC PSYCHOANALEPTIC PSYCHOANALEPTIC ANESTHETIC ANALGESIC MISC. NERVOUS ANTI-PARKINSON PSYCHOLEPTIC ANALGESIC ANTIEPILEPTIC MISC. NERVOUS ANALGESIC Approved 1880 Approved 1899 Approved 1900 Approved 1900 Approved 1902 Approved 1905 Approved 1916 Approved 1920 Approved 1920 Approved 1921 Approved 1926 Approved 1930 Approved 1930 Approved 1933 Approved 1934 Approved 1937 Approved 1937 Approved 1940 Approved 1940 Approved 1946 Approved 1947 Approved 1948 Approved 1948 Lidocaine Artane Anileridine Chlor-Trimeton Clonidine Ethchlorvynol Imipramine Morphine Percodan Paramethadione Secobarbital Apomorphine
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Discipline Review
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 209500Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary Review Office Director Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Clinical Review Non-Clinical Review Statistical Review Clinical Pharmacology Review NDA 209500 Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation Caplyta (lumateperone) NDA/BLA Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation Application Type NDA Application Number(s) 209500 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) September 27, 2018 Received Date(s) September 27, 2018 PDUFA Goal Date December 27, 2019 Division/Office Division of Psychiatry / Office of Drug Evaluation-I Review Completion Date December 20, 2019 Established/Proper Name Lumateperone (Proposed) Trade Name Caplyta Pharmacologic Class Atypical Antipsychotic Code name ITI-007 Applicant Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. Dosage form 42 mg Capsules Applicant proposed Dosing 42 mg by mouth once daily Regimen Applicant Proposed Schizophrenia/Adults Indication(s)/Population(s) Applicant Proposed 58214004 | Schizophrenia (disorder) SNOMED CT Indication Disease Term for each Proposed Indication Recommendation on Approval Regulatory Action Recommended Schizophrenia/Adults Indication(s)/Population(s) (if applicable) Recommended SNOMED 58214004 | Schizophrenia (disorder) CT Indication Disease Term for each Indication (if applicable) Recommended Dosing 42 mg by mouth once daily Regimen 1 Version date: October 12, 2018 Reference ID: 4537404 NDA 209500 Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation Caplyta (lumateperone) Table of Contents Table of
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Review(S)
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 22-173 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) Review and Evaluation of Clinical Data NDA #22-173/000 Sponsor: Eli Lilly and Company Drug: Olanzapine Pamoate Depot Proposed Indication: Schizophrenia Material Submitted: Resubmission to CR Letter Correspondence Date: March 11, 2009 Date Received: March 12, 2009 Related NDA: NDA 20592 (olanzapine oral tablet) I. Background The original NDA was submitted on April 27, 2007 for the indications of acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, and was granted a not approvable status on 25 February 2008. The primary deficiency in this application is the lack of sufficient information on the risk of a severe adverse event, the post- injection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS), characterized with severe central nerve system (CNS) depression and temporally associated with olanzapine pamoate depot (OP Depot) injection, which has been observed in approximately 1% of patients who have participated in the development program for OP Depot. On 7 May 2008, Lilly met with FDA to discuss aspects of a proposed amendment to the application that would address the primary deficiency, PDSS, including enhanced label language and risk-minimization activities. FDA suggested a medication registry in addition to the sponsor’s proposed risk management plan. On 13 June 2008, Lilly submitted a completed response package to the Not Approvable (NA) letter dated on 25 Feb. 2008. The submission includes an amended risk management plan, including additional information regarding the medication registry and draft training materials. On 15 December 2008, FDA issued a Complete Response (CR) Letter and requested the sponsor submitting a revised Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) and a revised Medication Guide to address the deficiencies identified by the division of Risk 1 Management (DRISK), the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Product Insert (PDF)
    PRODUCT INFORMATION Remoxipride (hydrochloride) Item No. 30971 CAS Registry No.: 73220-03-8 Formal Name: 3-bromo-N-[[(2S)-1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl] O methyl]-2,6-dimethoxy-benzamide, O Br monohydrochloride N MF: C16H23BrN2O3 • HCl FW: 407.7 H N Purity: ≥98% O Supplied as: A crystalline solid • HCl Storage: -20°C Stability: ≥2 years Information represents the product specifications. Batch specific analytical results are provided on each certificate of analysis. Laboratory Procedures Remoxipride (hydrochloride) is supplied as a crystalline solid. A stock solution may be made by dissolving the remoxipride (hydrochloride) in water. The solubility of remoxipride (hydrochloride) in water is approximately 100 nM. We do not recommend storing the aqueous solution for more than one day. Description 1 Remoxipride is an atypical antipsychotic and dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (Ki = 0.2 µM). It is selective for the dopamine D2 receptor over a panel of 33 receptors, neurotransmitter transporters, and ion channels at 10 µM but does inhibit the sigma (σ) receptor (Ki = 0.065 µM). Remoxipride (2-20 µmol/kg, i.p.) increases striatal 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic 2 acid (HVA) levels in rats. It inhibits apomorphine-induced stereotypy and hyperactivity in rats with ED50 values of 5.6 and 0.8 µmol/kg, respectively.3 Formulations containing remoxipride have previously been used in the treatment of schizophrenia. References 1. Leysen, J.E., Janssen, P.M.F., Schotte, A., et al. Interaction of antipsychotic drugs with neurotransmitter receptor sites in vitro and in vivo in relation to pharmacological and clinical effects: Role of 5HT2 receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorpromazine Equivalents: a Consensus of Opinion for Both Clinical and Research Applications
    DRUG INFORMATION QUARTERLY Chlorpromazine equivalents: a consensus of opinion for both clinical and research applications Moria Atkins, Adrian Burgess, Clare Bottomley and Massimo Riccio A consensusof available Information isused to produce levant articles from the medical literature were a working table of conversion for the most commonly obtained from reference lists of publications and used drugs to Chlorpromazine equivalents. A user- by searching the MEDLINEdatabase from 1989- friendly computer program has also been developed 1995. 1989 was chosen as a starting point from this information. The use of the concept In the because this was the year of publication of the clinical setting and for research purposes is briefly major papers by Rey and Schulz's teams which discussed. thoroughly reviewed the subject. No restrictive search parameters were imposed with regard to The use of high-dose neuroleptics has been type of publication. If there was any discrepancy debated in recent literature and reports of deaths in the literature about Chlorpromazine equiva occurring in patients given such high doses have lence the most often quoted figure was used. A received much publicity (Mehtonen et ai, 1991). range is quoted for depot drugs because of the The Royal College of Psychiatrists responded to extreme lack of agreement in the literature. The unease among its members on this subject by results of our survey are illustrated in Table 1. convening a consensus panel of experts to review the use of high-dose drugs (Thompson, 1994). Practice is changing towards using an effective Comment antipsychotic dose of a neuroleptic with added General agreement was found for most drugs benzodiazepines if required for tranquillisatìon.
    [Show full text]
  • (2006.01) A61P 25/36 (2006.01) A61K 9/00 (2006.01) (21) International Application Number: PCT/US20 19/059852 (22) International Filing Date: 05 November 2019 (05
    ( (51) International Patent Classification: A61K 31/485 (2006.01) A61P 25/36 (2006.01) A61K 9/00 (2006.01) (21) International Application Number: PCT/US20 19/059852 (22) International Filing Date: 05 November 2019 (05. 11.2019) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Language: English (30) Priority Data: 62/756,322 06 November 2018 (06. 11.2018) US 62/820,582 19 March 2019 (19.03.2019) US (71) Applicant: PURDUE PHARMA L.P. [US/US]; One Stamford Forum, 201 Tresser Boulevard, Stamford, CT 06901 (US). (72) Inventors: HUANG, Haiyong, Hugh; 5 Millar Court, Princeron Junction, NJ 08550 (US). SHET, Manjunath, S.; 22 Wimbledon Court, White Plains, NY 10607 (US). (74) Agent: KOPELEVICH, Sofia et al.; Lowenstein Sandler LLP, One Lowenstein Drive, Roseland, NJ 07068 (US). (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available) : AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW,KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY,MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]