DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 22B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 22B Appendix 22b Appendix 22b: 2009 Pharmacological study characteristics tables Please note that some of the references and the data in this appendix have been incorporated from the previous guideline and have therefore not been updated to reflect current house style. Full terms of abbreviations are listed at the back of the guideline, except in some instances where they are explained in situ. An asterisk next to an author’s name indicates that their study is the primary study. Contents Initial treatment with antipsychotic medication ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Characteristics of included studies (previous guideline) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Emsley1995 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Jones1998 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 References of included studies (previous guideline) ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Characteristics of included studies (update).............................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 DEHAAN2003 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 LEE2007 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 LIEBERMAN2003A ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 MCEVOY2007A ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 MOLLER2008 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 SCHOOLER2005 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 VANNIMWEGEN2008 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 References of included studies (update) ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Acute treatment with antipsychotic medication ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Characteristics of included studies (previous guideline) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Arvanitis1997 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28 Barnas1987 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Beasley1996a ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 Beasley1997 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Blin1996 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Carriere2000 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 1 Appendix 22b Study characteristics tables: Pharmacology Ceskova1993 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34 Cetin1999 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Chouinard1993 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36 Claus1991 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Conley2001.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Cooper1999a ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 Delcker1990 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Dieterle1999 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 41 Fleischhacker1989 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 41 Fleischhacker1996 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 41 Fleurot1997 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 Gureje1998 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 Hale2000 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43 HGBL1997 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Are the Acute Treatments for Migraine and How Are They Used?
    2. Acute Treatment CQ II-2-1 What are the acute treatments for migraine and how are they used? Recommendation The mainstay of acute treatment for migraine is pharmacotherapy. The drugs used include (1) acetaminophen, (2) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (3) ergotamines, (4) triptans and (5) antiemetics. Stratified treatment according to the severity of migraine is recommended: use NSAIDs such as aspirin and naproxen for mild to moderate headache, and use triptans for moderate to severe headache, or even mild to moderate headache when NSAIDs were ineffective in the past. It is necessary to give guidance and cautions to patients having acute attacks, and explain the methods of using medications (timing, dose, frequency of use) and medication use during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Grade A Background and Objective The objective of acute treatment is to resolve the migraine attack completely and rapidly and restore the patient’s normal functions. An ideal treatment should have the following characteristics: (1) resolves pain and associated symptoms rapidly; (2) is consistently effective; (3) no recurrence; (4) no need for additional use of medication; (5) no adverse effects; (6) can be administered by the patients themselves; and (7) low cost. Literature was searched to identify acute treatments that satisfy the above conditions. Comments and Evidence The acute treatment drugs for migraine generally include (1) acetaminophens, (2) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (3) ergotamines, (4) triptans, and (5) antiemetics. For severe migraines including status migrainosus and migraine attacks refractory to treatment, (6) anesthetics, and (7) corticosteroids (dexamethasone) are used (Tables 1 and 2).1)-9) There are two approaches to the selection and sequencing of these medications: “step care” and “stratified care”.
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
    Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta- analysis Leucht S, Corves C, D Arbter, Engel R R, Li C, Davis J M CRD summary The authors concluded that amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone can be effective in treating schizophrenia patients. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs can also result in fewer extrapyramidal side effects, but can induce weight gain. The authors' conclusions reflected the evidence presented, but some potential methodological flaws in the review process meant that the extent to which those conclusions were reliable was unclear. Authors' objectives To compare the effects of first and second-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia patients. Searching The search for eligible studies was started in 2005, including MEDLINE to October 2006, Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Specialised Register and the US Food and Drugs Administration website. Search terms were reported and there were no language restrictions. Previous reviews were searched for additional relevant studies. Study selection Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of oral second-generation antipsychotic drugs (amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone and zotepine) compared with first-generation drugs in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders (schizoaffective, schizophreniform or delusional disorders) irrespective of diagnostic criteria were eligible for inclusion in the review. The optimum doses of second-generation drugs were selected
    [Show full text]
  • 2D6 Substrates 2D6 Inhibitors 2D6 Inducers
    Physician Guidelines: Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P450’s 1 2D6 Substrates Acetaminophen Captopril Dextroamphetamine Fluphenazine Methoxyphenamine Paroxetine Tacrine Ajmaline Carteolol Dextromethorphan Fluvoxamine Metoclopramide Perhexiline Tamoxifen Alprenolol Carvedilol Diazinon Galantamine Metoprolol Perphenazine Tamsulosin Amiflamine Cevimeline Dihydrocodeine Guanoxan Mexiletine Phenacetin Thioridazine Amitriptyline Chloropromazine Diltiazem Haloperidol Mianserin Phenformin Timolol Amphetamine Chlorpheniramine Diprafenone Hydrocodone Minaprine Procainamide Tolterodine Amprenavir Chlorpyrifos Dolasetron Ibogaine Mirtazapine Promethazine Tradodone Aprindine Cinnarizine Donepezil Iloperidone Nefazodone Propafenone Tramadol Aripiprazole Citalopram Doxepin Imipramine Nifedipine Propranolol Trimipramine Atomoxetine Clomipramine Encainide Indoramin Nisoldipine Quanoxan Tropisetron Benztropine Clozapine Ethylmorphine Lidocaine Norcodeine Quetiapine Venlafaxine Bisoprolol Codeine Ezlopitant Loratidine Nortriptyline Ranitidine Verapamil Brofaramine Debrisoquine Flecainide Maprotline olanzapine Remoxipride Zotepine Bufuralol Delavirdine Flunarizine Mequitazine Ondansetron Risperidone Zuclopenthixol Bunitrolol Desipramine Fluoxetine Methadone Oxycodone Sertraline Butylamphetamine Dexfenfluramine Fluperlapine Methamphetamine Parathion Sparteine 2D6 Inhibitors Ajmaline Chlorpromazine Diphenhydramine Indinavir Mibefradil Pimozide Terfenadine Amiodarone Cimetidine Doxorubicin Lasoprazole Moclobemide Quinidine Thioridazine Amitriptyline Cisapride
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Formulations for Treatment of Migraine
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 756 756 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 23.07.2014 Bulletin 2014/30 A01N 43/42 (2006.01) A61K 31/44 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 14165112.5 (22) Date of filing: 24.04.2009 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Turanin, John AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Emeryville, CA California 94608 (US) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL • Hawley, Roger PT RO SE SI SK TR Emeryville, CA California 94608 (US) • Schuster, Jeffrey, A. (30) Priority: 28.04.2008 US 48463 Bolinas, CA California 94924 (US) (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in (74) Representative: Duxbury, Stephen et al accordance with Art. 76 EPC: Arnold & Siedsma 09739139.5 / 2 273 880 Pettenkoferstrasse 37 80336 München (DE) (71) Applicant: Zogenix, Inc. Emeryville CA 94608 (US) Remarks: This application was filed on 17-04-2014 as a (72) Inventors: divisional application to the application mentioned • Farr, Stephen J. under INID code 62. Orinda, CA California 94563 (US) (54) Novel formulations for treatment of migraine (57) Systems and methods are described for treating Systems that are self contained, portable, prefilled, and un-met medical needs in migraine and related conditions simple to self administer at the onset of a migraine attack such as cluster headache. Included are treatments that are disclosed, and preferably include a needle-free in- are both rapid onset and long acting, which include sus- jector and a high viscosity formulation, to eliminate such tained release formulations, and combination products, issues as fear of self administration with needles, and Also included are treatments for multiple symptoms of needle stick and cross contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacotherapy, Drug-Drug Interactions and Potentially
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.31.21254518; this version posted April 6, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders Jan Wolff1,2,3, Pamela Reißner4, Gudrun Hefner5, Claus Normann2, Klaus Kaier6, Harald Binder6, Christoph Hiemke7, Sermin Toto8, Katharina Domschke2, Michael Marschollek1, Ansgar Klimke4,9 1 Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Germany. 2 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 3 Evangelical Foundation NeuerKerode, Germany. 4 Vitos Hochtaunus, Friedrichsdorf, Germany. 5 Vitos Clinic for Forensic Psychiatry, Eltville, Germany 6 Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany. 7 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany. 8 Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Germany. 9 Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany. ___ Correspondence Dr. Jan Wolff, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Address: Karl- Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover. Email: [email protected], wolff.jan@mh- hannover.de, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-0606 Key words (MeSH) Depression, Polypharmacy, Antidepressants, Hospitals, Drug Interactions, Psychiatry NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Antipsychotic Treatment on Metabolic Function: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    The effects of antipsychotic treatment on metabolic function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Toby Pillinger, Robert McCutcheon, Luke Vano, Katherine Beck, Guy Hindley, Atheeshaan Arumuham, Yuya Mizuno, Sridhar Natesan, Orestis Efthimiou, Andrea Cipriani, Oliver Howes ****PROTOCOL**** Review questions 1. What is the magnitude of metabolic dysregulation (defined as alterations in fasting glucose, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) and alterations in body weight and body mass index associated with short-term (‘acute’) antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia? 2. Does baseline physiology (e.g. body weight) and demographics (e.g. age) of patients predict magnitude of antipsychotic-associated metabolic dysregulation? 3. Are alterations in metabolic parameters over time associated with alterations in degree of psychopathology? 1 Searches We plan to search EMBASE, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception using the following terms: 1 (Acepromazine or Acetophenazine or Amisulpride or Aripiprazole or Asenapine or Benperidol or Blonanserin or Bromperidol or Butaperazine or Carpipramine or Chlorproethazine or Chlorpromazine or Chlorprothixene or Clocapramine or Clopenthixol or Clopentixol or Clothiapine or Clotiapine or Clozapine or Cyamemazine or Cyamepromazine or Dixyrazine or Droperidol or Fluanisone or Flupehenazine or Flupenthixol or Flupentixol or Fluphenazine or Fluspirilen or Fluspirilene or Haloperidol or Iloperidone
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness Et Al
    USOO6264,917B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 24, 2001 (54) TARGETED ULTRASOUND CONTRAST 5,733,572 3/1998 Unger et al.. AGENTS 5,780,010 7/1998 Lanza et al. 5,846,517 12/1998 Unger .................................. 424/9.52 (75) Inventors: Jo Klaveness; Pál Rongved; Dagfinn 5,849,727 12/1998 Porter et al. ......................... 514/156 Lovhaug, all of Oslo (NO) 5,910,300 6/1999 Tournier et al. .................... 424/9.34 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo (NO) 2 145 SOS 4/1994 (CA). (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 19 626 530 1/1998 (DE). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 O 727 225 8/1996 (EP). U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. WO91/15244 10/1991 (WO). WO 93/20802 10/1993 (WO). WO 94/07539 4/1994 (WO). (21) Appl. No.: 08/958,993 WO 94/28873 12/1994 (WO). WO 94/28874 12/1994 (WO). (22) Filed: Oct. 28, 1997 WO95/03356 2/1995 (WO). WO95/03357 2/1995 (WO). Related U.S. Application Data WO95/07072 3/1995 (WO). (60) Provisional application No. 60/049.264, filed on Jun. 7, WO95/15118 6/1995 (WO). 1997, provisional application No. 60/049,265, filed on Jun. WO 96/39149 12/1996 (WO). 7, 1997, and provisional application No. 60/049.268, filed WO 96/40277 12/1996 (WO). on Jun. 7, 1997. WO 96/40285 12/1996 (WO). (30) Foreign Application Priority Data WO 96/41647 12/1996 (WO).
    [Show full text]
  • Antipsychotics and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death
    ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Antipsychotics and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death Sabine M. J. M. Straus, MD; Gyse`le S. Bleumink, MD; Jeanne P. Dieleman, PhD; Johan van der Lei, MD, PhD; Geert W. ‘t Jong, PhD; J. Herre Kingma, MD, PhD; Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom, PhD; Bruno H. C. Stricker, PhD Background: Antipsychotics have been associated with Results: The study population comprised 554 cases of prolongation of the corrected QT interval and sudden car- sudden cardiac death. Current use of antipsychotics was diac death. Only a few epidemiological studies have in- associated with a 3-fold increase in risk of sudden car- vestigated this association. We performed a case- diac death. The risk of sudden cardiac death was high- control study to investigate the association between use est among those using butyrophenone antipsychotics, of antipsychotics and sudden cardiac death in a well- those with a defined daily dose equivalent of more than defined community-dwelling population. 0.5 and short-term (Յ90 days) users. The association with current antipsychotic use was higher for witnessed cases Methods: We performed a population-based case-control (n=334) than for unwitnessed cases. study in the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) project, a longitudinal observational database with com- Conclusions: Current use of antipsychotics in a gen- plete medical records from 150 general practitioners. All eral population is associated with an increased risk of sud- instances of death between January 1, 1995, and April 1, den cardiac death, even at a low dose and for indica- 2001, were reviewed. Sudden cardiac death was classified tions other than schizophrenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Contractile Responses to Ergotamine and Dihydroergotamine in The
    J Headache Pain (2007) 8:83-89 DOI 10.1007/s10194-007-0368-9 ORIGINAL Peer Tfelt-Hansen Contractile responses to ergotamine and Elisabeth Nilsson Lars Edvinsson dihydroergotamine in the perfused middle cerebral artery of rat Received: 2 November 2006 Abstract The vasomotor effects of 7.6±0.2 for ergotamine and Accepted in revised form: 22 January 2007 ergotamine and dihydroergotamine 8.4±0.5 for DHE. The responses Published online: 11 May 2007 (DHE) on the middle cerebral were blocked by the 5-HT2A recep- artery (MCA) of rats were studied tor antagonist ketanserin (concen- using the pressurised arteriography tration 10–12 to 10–5 M) and partial- method and in vitro myographs. ly with the 5-HT1B receptor antago- MCAs from Sprague–Dawley rats nist BRL-11557PM-B. The 5-HT1D were mounted on two glass receptor antagonist SB-224289-A micropipettes using the arterio- had no significant effect. Using a graph, pressurised to 85 mmHg myograph technique, isolated ring and luminally perfused. All vessels segments of the MCA with intact used attained spontaneous contrac- endothelium were mounted on two tile tone (34.9±1.8% of resting metal wires. Neither agonist P. Tfelt-Hansen tone) and responded to luminal caused relaxation of resting ves- Department of Neurology, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) with sels, however, they both responded Copenhagen University Hospital, dilatation (24.1±4.0%), which by weak contractile responses Glostrup, Denmark showed functioning endothelium. (26±3% of submaximal contractile E. Nilsson (౧) • L. Edvinsson Luminally added ergotamine or capacity relative to 60 mM potassi- Department of Internal Medicine, DHE induced maximal contrac- um).
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4 P.M
    Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4 p.m. Oklahoma Health Care Authority 4345 N. Lincoln Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73105 The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center COLLEGE OF PHARMACY PHARMACY MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM TO: Drug Utilization Review (DUR) Board Members FROM: Bethany Holderread, Pharm.D. SUBJECT: Packet Contents for DUR Board Meeting – February 10, 2016 DATE: February 1, 2016 Note: The DUR Board will meet at 4:00p.m. The meeting will be held at 4345 N Lincoln Blvd. Enclosed are the following items related to the February meeting. Material is arranged in order of the agenda. Call to Order Public Comment Forum Action Item – Approval of DUR Board Meeting Minutes – Appendix A Update on Medication Coverage Authorization Unit/Oral Viscous Lidocaine Claims Analysis Update – Appendix B Action Item – Vote to Prior Authorize Duopa™ (Carbidopa/Levodopa Enteral Suspension) and Rytary™ (Carbidopa/Levodopa Extended-Release Capsules) – Appendix C Action Item – Vote to Prior Authorize Cortisporin® and Pediotic® (Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Hydrocortisone Otic) – Appendix D Action Item – Vote to Prior Authorize Migranal® (Dihydroergotamine Nasal Spray) – Appendix E Action Item – Vote to Prior Authorize Strensiq™ (Asfotase Alfa) – Appendix F Action Item – Vote to Prior Authorize Varubi™ (Rolapitant) – Appendix G Action Item – Vote to Prior Authorize Xuriden™ (Uridine Triacetate) – Appendix H Annual Review of Gout Medications and 30-Day Notice to Prior Authorize Mitigare™ (Colchicine Capsules) and Zurampic® (Lesinurad) – Appendix I Annual Review of Seizure Medications and 30-Day Notice to Prior Authorize Spritam® (Levetiracetam) – Appendix J 30-Day Notice to Prior Authorize Solaraze® (Diclofenac Gel) – Appendix K Annual Review of Ulcerative Colitis Medications and 30-Day Notice to Prior Authorize Uceris® (Budesonide Extended-Release Tablets), Uceris® (Budesonide Rectal Foam), and Miscellaneous Mesalamine Products – Appendix L Annual Review of Ocular Allergy Medications and 30-Day Notice to Prior Authorize Pazeo® (Olopatadine Ophthalmic) – Appendix M ORI-4403 • P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome with Low-Dose Dihydroergotamine Possibly Potentiated by Valproic Acid and Erenumab: a Case Report
    Case Report J Neurol Res. 2020;10(1):20-24 Acute Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome With Low-Dose Dihydroergotamine Possibly Potentiated by Valproic Acid and Erenumab: A Case Report Hsiangkuo Yuana, Stephanie J. Nahasa, Matthew A. Berka, b Abstract disabling headache attacks believed to be due to trigeminovas- cular dysfunction, can be challenging. Migraine preventives Dihydroergotamine (DHE), in the setting of polypharmacy, may increase carried over from medications designed for other medical con- the possibility of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). ditions (e.g., antiepileptics, antihypertensives, antidepressants) A 64-year-old woman with chronic migraine and medication-overuse commonly display unique adverse event (AE) profiles that headache (on amitriptyline, duloxetine, erenumab) was electively ad- can lead to reduced medication adherence and poor migraine mitted for 5 days of intravenous (IV) ketamine (up to 55 mg/h) to treat control [1]. In refractory migraine, use of intravenous (IV) intractable migraine pain. On the seventh day, upon receiving her forth medications such as lidocaine, dihydroergotamine (DHE), dose of IV DHE (0.25 mg) and the first of IV valproic acid (VPA) (500 or ketamine may offer acute relief [2, 3]. Despite achieving mg) adjunctively, she developed acute bilateral decreased visual acuity, greater headache control by using a cocktail of medications, bitemporal visual field deficit, and unsteady gait. Brain magnetic reso- unexpected AEs may occur, especially in the setting of poly- nance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography (MRI/MRA) showed pharmacy. Here, we report a case of a woman who developed confluent bilateral T2 hyperintensities with punctate restricted diffusion posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and in the occipital lobes associated with multi-segmental narrowing involv- reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) while ing anterior, middle, posterior cerebral, and basilar arteries consistent being treated with IV ketamine, neuroleptics, DHE, and other with RCVS.
    [Show full text]
  • Antipsychotics
    The Fut ure of Antipsychotic Therapy (page 7 in syllabus) Stepp,,hen M. Stahl, MD, PhD Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry Universityyg of California, San Diego School of Medicine Honorary Visiting Senior Fellow, Cambridge University, UK Sppyonsored by the Neuroscience Education Institute Additionally sponsored by the American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy This activity is supported by an educational grant from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Copyright © 2011 Neuroscience Education Institute. All rights reserved. Individual Disclosure Statement Faculty Editor / Presenter Stephen M. Stahl, MD, PhD, is an adjunct professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, and an honorary visiting senior fellow at the University of Cambridge in the UK. Grant/Research: AstraZeneca, BioMarin, Dainippon Sumitomo, Dey, Forest, Genomind, Lilly, Merck, Pamlab, Pfizer, PGxHealth/Trovis, Schering-Plough, Sepracor/Sunovion, Servier, Shire, Torrent Consultant/Advisor: Advent, Alkermes, Arena, AstraZeneca, AVANIR, BioMarin, Biovail, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CeNeRx, Cypress, Dainippon Sumitomo, Dey, Forest, Genomind, Janssen, Jazz, Labopharm, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Neuronetics, Novartis, Ono, Orexigen, Otsuka, Pamlab, Pfizer, PGxHealth/Trovis, Rexahn, Roche, Royalty, Schering-Plough, Servier, Shire, Solvay/Abbott, Sunovion/Sepracor, Valeant, VIVUS, Speakers Bureau: Dainippon Sumitomo, Forest, Lilly, Merck, Pamlab, Pfizer, Sepracor/Sunovion, Servier, Wyeth Copyright © 2011 Neuroscience Education Institute. All rights reserved. Learninggj Objectives • Differentiate antipsychotic drugs from each other on the basis of their pharmacological mechanisms and their associated therapeutic and side effects • Integrate novel treatment approaches into clinical practice according to best practices guidelines • Identify novel therapeutic options currently being researched for the treatment of schizophrenia Copyright © 2011 Neuroscience Education Institute.
    [Show full text]