Dopamine Receptor Contribution to the Action of PCP, LSD and Ketamine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dopamine Receptor Contribution to the Action of PCP, LSD and Ketamine Molecular Psychiatry (2005) 10, 877–883 & 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1359-4184/05 $30.00 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Dopamine receptor contribution to the action of PCP, LSD and ketamine psychotomimetics P Seeman1,2,FKo1 and T Tallerico2 1Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Although phencyclidine and ketamine are used to model a hypoglutamate theory of schizophrenia, their selectivity for NMDA receptors has been questioned. To determine the affinities of phencyclidine, ketamine, dizocilpine and LSD for the functional high-affinity state High of the dopamine D2 receptor, D2 , their dissociation constants (Ki) were obtained on [3H]domperidone binding to human cloned dopamine D2 receptors. Phencyclidine had a high High affinity for D2 with a Ki of 2.7 nM, in contrast to its low affinity for the NMDA receptor, with a 3 Ki of 313 nM, as labeled by [ H]dizocilpine on rat striatal tissue. Ketamine also had a high High affinity for D2 with a Ki of 55 nM, an affinity higher than its 3100 nM Ki for the NMDA sites. High Dizocilpine had a Ki of 0.3 nM at D2 , but a Kd of 1.8 nM at the NMDA receptor. LSD had a Ki of 2nMatD2High. Because the psychotomimetics had higher potency at D2High than at the NMDA site, the psychotomimetic action of these drugs must have a major contribution from D2 agonism. Because these drugs have a combined action on both dopamine receptors and NMDA receptors, these drugs, when given in vivo, test a combined hyperdopamine and hypoglutamate theory of psychosis. Molecular Psychiatry (2005) 10, 877–883. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001682; published online 26 April 2005 Keywords: dopamine receptor; phencyclidine; domperidone; ketamine; NMDA receptors; psychotomimetics While the clinical anti-dopaminergic actions of anti- pride at striatal D2 receptors, but has a dissociation psychotic drugs are compatible with the hyperdopa- constant of 1.5 nM at the D2High receptor when the mine hypothesis of psychosis and schizophrenia,1,2 link between dopamine D1 and D2 receptors is the psychoses caused by glutamate antagonists such blocked by the D1 antagonist SCH23390.10 The link as phencyclidine or ketamine suggest a hypo-gluta- between D1 and D2 receptors arises from several mate component in psychosis.3–5 However, phency- sources, including the colocalization of dopamine D1 clidine also lowers plasma prolactin6 and elicits and D2 receptors in at least 50% of the medium spiny rotation,7 suggesting a direct or indirect dopamine- neurons in the striatum, the cooperation and mutual mimetic action of phencyclidine. potentiation of D1 and D2 agonists on various Although phencyclidine and ketamine are not behaviors, and the biochemical conversion of D2 selective for glutamate NMDA receptors,8 the precise receptors from their functional high-affinity state, High affinities of these drugs for dopamine D2 receptors D2 , into their low-affinity state, D2Low, in the 10–13 need to be clarified in order to determine their presence of a D1 antagonist. This D1–D2 link has dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic components of been detected in vitro in human and rat striata,10,11 action. More specifically, although phencyclidine had and in tissue culture cells transfected with both D1 a dissociation constant of 37 000 nM at the D2 and D2,12 but has not yet been demonstrated in receptor in rat striatal homogenate,8 phencyclidine humans by means of positron emission tomography had a dissociation constant of 1.3 nM for the func- and [11C]raclopride. tional high-affinity site of the cloned D2 receptor, or However, in order to compare the potencies of the D2High receptor.9 psychotomimetics at dopamine D2 receptors with This apparent discrepancy may be resolved by the their potencies at NMDA receptors, it would be better recent finding that dopamine itself has a dissociation to avoid using SCH23390. This is because SCH23390 constant of 3000 nM when competing vs [3H]raclo- can also affect the potency of drugs at the NMDA receptor, especially since it is known that D1 and NMDA receptors interact.14–16 Correspondence: Dr P Seeman, MD, PhD, Departments of Although the blockade of D1 (by SCH23390) Pharmacology and Psychiatry, Medical Science Building, Room unmasks the functional D2High states,11 the addition 4344, University of Toronto, 1 King’s College Circle, Toronto, of SCH23390 is only needed when using [3H]raclo- Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Received 23 November 2004; revised 4 March 2005; accepted 21 pride to measure D2 receptors. [ H]Domperidone, March 2005; published online 26 April 2005 however, is a selective ligand for D2 that readily Dopamine receptors, phencyclidine and ketamine P Seeman et al 878 detects D2High receptors without the addition of scintillant (Ready Solve, Beckman Co., CA, USA), SCH23390.17 and were monitored 6 h later for tritium in a Beckman Therefore, in order to obtain the potencies of L5000 scintillation spectrometer at 55% efficiency. phencyclidine, ketamine, dizocilpine and LSD at the The nonspecific binding of the [3H]ligand to the functional D2High receptor, the present study used dopamine D2 receptors was defined as that which [3H]domperidone to label D2 receptors. The results occurred in the presence of 10 mM S-sulpiride indicate that the potencies of the psychotomimetics (Ravizza, Milan). The dissociation constants (Kd)of were greater at D2High than at the NMDA receptor. [3H]domperidone for the dopamine D2 receptors (0.42 nM on the cloned D2 receptor and 0.47 nM on 17 Materials and methods the rat striatal tissue ) were obtained by the above method, using a range of 12 final concentrations of 3 We used the human cloned dopamine D2Long receptor 0.1–20 nM [ H]domperidone. The dissociation con- (in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells18) . The cells stant for [3H]dizocilpine was 1.8 nM (rat striatum), were harvested by gently scraping the cells off the using 100 mM phencyclidine to define nonspecific bottom of the Petri dish, centrifuged, resuspended in binding. The Kd value was calculated by nonlinear phosphate-buffered saline (0.9% NaCl), recentrifuged regression analysis of the [3H]ligand saturation and the pellet frozen at À701. When used, the frozen curve.19 The competition data were analyzed as pellet was thawed, and the cells suspended at 200 mg previously described;20 the program provided two protein/ml. The suspension was homogenized for statistical criteria to judge whether a two-site fit was 5 s (Brinkmann Polytron, setting 5 (maximum on better than a one-site fit, or whether a three-site fit scale was 10)), without any further washing or was better than a two-site fit. centrifugation. The drug-induced incorporation of [35S]GTP-g-S Frozen rat brains were purchased (Pel-Freez, (1250 Ci/mmol; final concentration 0.2–0.3 nM) Rogers, AR, USA), partly thawed and the striata was carried out using the procedure previously removed. To prepare the tissues for the drug/[3H] described.8 ligand competition-type experiments, the striatal tissues were blotted and weighed; buffer was added Results (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 4 mM MgCl2, with a final concentration Phencyclidine of 120 mM NaCl added later in the final incubation As noted above, both [3H]raclopride and [3H]domper- tubes) to yield 4 mg tissue per ml. The suspension idone selectively label D2 receptors, but [3H]domper- was homogenized with a glass-Teflon homogenizer idone is more sensitive than [3H]raclopride to the (10 up–down strokes of a piston rotating at 500 rpm). competitive action of dopamine and other drugs and The homogenate was not washed, centrifuged or readily allows the detection of D2High sites.17 There- preincubated because previous work found that these fore, using the more readily displaceable [3H]domper- procedures resulted in a loss of 30–60% of dopamine idone, phencyclidine had a dissociation constant at 19 High D2 receptors. D2 of 2.770.8 nM (n ¼ 9) (Figure 1, top) for the [3H]Dizocilpine (or [3H]( þ )MK801; 17 Ci/mmol; human cloned D2 receptor and 4.370.8 nM for the rat 3 nM final concentration in the incubation tubes) striatal tissue (Figure 1, middle). These Ki values were was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences Inc. essentially unchanged when phencyclidine was (Boston, MA, USA). [3H]Domperidone was custom tested in the presence of 100 nM SCH23390 to synthesized as [phenyl-3H(N)]domperidone (42 Ci/ occlude other receptors such as dopamine D1 recep- mmol) by PerkinElmer Life Sciences Inc., and used tors and serotonin-2 receptors that may interact with at a final concentration of 1.2–1.8 nM. the D2 receptor.10 The competition-type experiment between a drug In contrast, the phencyclidine Ki for inhibiting and the [3H]ligand for binding at the receptors was the binding of [3H]dizocilpine to rat striatal homo- carried out as follows. Each incubation tube genate was 313748 nM (n ¼ 9) (Figure 1, bottom). (12 Â 75 mm, glass) received, in the following order, The addition of 2 mM glutamate did not change 0.5 ml buffer (with a final incubate concentration of the phencyclidine Ki values. either 10 mM or, more usually, 120 mM NaCl), 0.25 ml In order to determine the functional concentration [3H]ligand and 0.25 ml of tissue homogenate. The range for phencyclidine, the effect of phencyclidine tubes, containing a total volume of 1 ml, were on the incorporation of [35S]GTP-g-S was tested on incubated for 2 h at room temperature (201C), after the human cloned D2 receptors.
Recommended publications
  • Dextromethorphan Attenuates Sensorineural Hearing Loss in an Animal Model and Population-Based Cohort Study
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Dextromethorphan Attenuates Sensorineural Hearing Loss in an Animal Model and Population-Based Cohort Study Hsin-Chien Chen 1,* , Chih-Hung Wang 1,2 , Wu-Chien Chien 3,4 , Chi-Hsiang Chung 3,4, Cheng-Ping Shih 1, Yi-Chun Lin 1,2, I-Hsun Li 5,6, Yuan-Yung Lin 1,2 and Chao-Yin Kuo 1 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan; [email protected] (C.-H.W.); [email protected] (C.-P.S.); [email protected] (Y.-C.L.); [email protected] (Y.-Y.L.); [email protected] (C.-Y.K.) 2 Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan 3 School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan; [email protected] (W.-C.C.); [email protected] (C.-H.C.) 4 Department of Medical Research, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan 5 Department of Pharmacy Practice, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-2-8792-7192; Fax: +886-2-8792-7193 Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 28 August 2020; Published: 31 August 2020 Abstract: The effect of dextromethorphan (DXM) use in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has not been fully examined. We conducted an animal model and nationwide retrospective matched-cohort study to explore the association between DXM use and SNHL.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Acute Treatments for Migraine and How Are They Used?
    2. Acute Treatment CQ II-2-1 What are the acute treatments for migraine and how are they used? Recommendation The mainstay of acute treatment for migraine is pharmacotherapy. The drugs used include (1) acetaminophen, (2) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (3) ergotamines, (4) triptans and (5) antiemetics. Stratified treatment according to the severity of migraine is recommended: use NSAIDs such as aspirin and naproxen for mild to moderate headache, and use triptans for moderate to severe headache, or even mild to moderate headache when NSAIDs were ineffective in the past. It is necessary to give guidance and cautions to patients having acute attacks, and explain the methods of using medications (timing, dose, frequency of use) and medication use during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Grade A Background and Objective The objective of acute treatment is to resolve the migraine attack completely and rapidly and restore the patient’s normal functions. An ideal treatment should have the following characteristics: (1) resolves pain and associated symptoms rapidly; (2) is consistently effective; (3) no recurrence; (4) no need for additional use of medication; (5) no adverse effects; (6) can be administered by the patients themselves; and (7) low cost. Literature was searched to identify acute treatments that satisfy the above conditions. Comments and Evidence The acute treatment drugs for migraine generally include (1) acetaminophens, (2) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (3) ergotamines, (4) triptans, and (5) antiemetics. For severe migraines including status migrainosus and migraine attacks refractory to treatment, (6) anesthetics, and (7) corticosteroids (dexamethasone) are used (Tables 1 and 2).1)-9) There are two approaches to the selection and sequencing of these medications: “step care” and “stratified care”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of 5-HT1A Receptor Antagonist on Reward-Based
    The Journal of Physiological Sciences (2019) 69:1057–1069 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-019-00725-1 ORIGINAL PAPER The efect of 5‑HT1A receptor antagonist on reward‑based decision‑making Fumika Akizawa1 · Takashi Mizuhiki1,2 · Tsuyoshi Setogawa1,2 · Mai Takafuji1 · Munetaka Shidara1,2 Received: 5 July 2019 / Accepted: 27 October 2019 / Published online: 8 November 2019 © The Physiological Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract When choosing the best action from several alternatives, we compare each value that depends on the balance between beneft and cost. Previous studies have shown that animals and humans with low brain serotonin (5-HT) level tend to choose smaller immediate reward. We used a decision-making schedule task to investigate whether 5-HT1A receptor is responsible for the decisions related to reward. In this task, the monkeys chose either of two diferent alternatives that were comprised of 1–4 drops of liquid reward (beneft) and 1–4 repeats of a color discrimination trial (workload cost), then executed the chosen schedule. By the administration of 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY100635, the choice tendency did not change, however, the sen- sitivity to the amount of reward in the schedule part was diminished. The 5-HT1A could have a role in maintaining reward value to keep track with the promised reward rather than modulating workload discounting of reward value. Keywords 5-HT1A · Value discounting · WAY100635 · Decision-making · Workload · Rhesus monkey Introduction comprises an iteration of simple color discriminations. The monkey can choose one of two diferent schedules to earn Whenever we choose an option from two or more alterna- promised reward.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study on Addressing Abuse of a Safe and Effective Drug David C
    Spangler et al. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy (2016) 11:22 DOI 10.1186/s13011-016-0067-0 DEBATE Open Access Dextromethorphan: a case study on addressing abuse of a safe and effective drug David C. Spangler1, Catherine M. Loyd1* and Emily E. Skor1,2 Abstract Background: Dextromethorphan is a safe, effective cough suppressant, available without a prescription in the United States since 1958. Due to a perceived prevalence of abuse of dextromethorphan by teens, in 2007 the Drug Enforcement Administration requested the Food and Drug Administration evaluate whether dextromethorphan should be recommended for scheduling under the Controlled Substances Act. The Food and Drug Administration held an Advisory Committee meeting in 2010 to provide a scientific and medical evaluation of dextromethorphan and its abuse potential. Discussion: To address reports of abuse, particularly by teens in the United States, the Consumer Healthcare Products Association initiated an abuse mitigation plan in 2010 with specific goals related to awareness of the behavior, perception of risk, social disapproval, and access to the products. In identifying abuse interventions, experts acknowledge that substance abuse among teens is a highly complex behavior and indicate that the best course of action is to address prevention by focusing on the factors that impact teen behavior. Conclusion: It is noteworthy that the annual prevalence of over-the-counter cough medicine abuse has sharply decreased since 2010. While a true cause-and-effect relationship cannot be assured, the Consumer Healthcare Products Association and its member companies believe that the increased awareness of the issue since the 2010 Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee meeting, and the subsequent implementation of a well-delivered and targeted abuse mitigation plan that addressed the levers influencing teen decisions is contributing to the observed reduction in abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • 2D6 Substrates 2D6 Inhibitors 2D6 Inducers
    Physician Guidelines: Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P450’s 1 2D6 Substrates Acetaminophen Captopril Dextroamphetamine Fluphenazine Methoxyphenamine Paroxetine Tacrine Ajmaline Carteolol Dextromethorphan Fluvoxamine Metoclopramide Perhexiline Tamoxifen Alprenolol Carvedilol Diazinon Galantamine Metoprolol Perphenazine Tamsulosin Amiflamine Cevimeline Dihydrocodeine Guanoxan Mexiletine Phenacetin Thioridazine Amitriptyline Chloropromazine Diltiazem Haloperidol Mianserin Phenformin Timolol Amphetamine Chlorpheniramine Diprafenone Hydrocodone Minaprine Procainamide Tolterodine Amprenavir Chlorpyrifos Dolasetron Ibogaine Mirtazapine Promethazine Tradodone Aprindine Cinnarizine Donepezil Iloperidone Nefazodone Propafenone Tramadol Aripiprazole Citalopram Doxepin Imipramine Nifedipine Propranolol Trimipramine Atomoxetine Clomipramine Encainide Indoramin Nisoldipine Quanoxan Tropisetron Benztropine Clozapine Ethylmorphine Lidocaine Norcodeine Quetiapine Venlafaxine Bisoprolol Codeine Ezlopitant Loratidine Nortriptyline Ranitidine Verapamil Brofaramine Debrisoquine Flecainide Maprotline olanzapine Remoxipride Zotepine Bufuralol Delavirdine Flunarizine Mequitazine Ondansetron Risperidone Zuclopenthixol Bunitrolol Desipramine Fluoxetine Methadone Oxycodone Sertraline Butylamphetamine Dexfenfluramine Fluperlapine Methamphetamine Parathion Sparteine 2D6 Inhibitors Ajmaline Chlorpromazine Diphenhydramine Indinavir Mibefradil Pimozide Terfenadine Amiodarone Cimetidine Doxorubicin Lasoprazole Moclobemide Quinidine Thioridazine Amitriptyline Cisapride
    [Show full text]
  • Subanesthetic Doses of Ketamine Transiently Decrease Serotonin Transporter Activity: a PET Study in Conscious Monkeys
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2013) 38, 2666–2674 & 2013 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved 0893-133X/13 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Subanesthetic Doses of Ketamine Transiently Decrease Serotonin Transporter Activity: A PET Study in Conscious Monkeys 1 1 1 1 1 Shigeyuki Yamamoto , Hiroyuki Ohba , Shingo Nishiyama , Norihiro Harada , Takeharu Kakiuchi , 1 ,2 Hideo Tsukada and Edward F Domino* 1 2 Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Hamakita, Japan; Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Subanesthetic doses of ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) antagonist, have a rapid antidepressant effect which lasts for up to 2 weeks. However, the neurobiological mechanism regarding this effect remains unclear. In the present study, the effects of subanesthetic doses of ketamine on serotonergic systems in conscious monkey brain were investigated. Five young monkeys 11 underwent four positron emission tomography measurements with [ C]-3-amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethyl-phenylsulfanyl)benzoni- 11 trile ([ C]DASB) for the serotonin transporter (SERT), during and after intravenous infusion of vehicle or ketamine hydrochloride in a 11 dose of 0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg for 40 min, and 24 h post infusion. Global reduction of [ C]DASB binding to SERT was observed during ketamine infusion in a dose-dependent manner, but not 24 h later. The effect of ketamine on the serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1A-R) and dopamine transporter (DAT) was also investigated in the same subjects studied with [11C]DASB. No significant changes were observed in either 5-HT -R or DAT binding after ketamine infusion. Microdialysis analysis indicated that ketamine infusion transiently increased 1A serotonin levels in the extracellular fluid of the prefrontal cortex.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs That Can Cause Delirium (Anticholinergic / Toxic Metabolites)
    Drugs that can Cause Delirium (anticholinergic / toxic metabolites) Deliriants (drugs causing delirium) Prescription drugs . Central acting agents – Sedative hypnotics (e.g., benzodiazepines) – Anticonvulsants (e.g., barbiturates) – Antiparkinsonian agents (e.g., benztropine, trihexyphenidyl) . Analgesics – Narcotics (NB. meperidine*) – Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs* . Antihistamines (first generation, e.g., hydroxyzine) . Gastrointestinal agents – Antispasmodics – H2-blockers* . Antinauseants – Scopolamine – Dimenhydrinate . Antibiotics – Fluoroquinolones* . Psychotropic medications – Tricyclic antidepressants – Lithium* . Cardiac medications – Antiarrhythmics – Digitalis* – Antihypertensives (b-blockers, methyldopa) . Miscellaneous – Skeletal muscle relaxants – Steroids Over the counter medications and complementary/alternative medications . Antihistamines (NB. first generation) – diphenhydramine, chlorpheniramine). Antinauseants – dimenhydrinate, scopolamine . Liquid medications containing alcohol . Mandrake . Henbane . Jimson weed . Atropa belladonna extract * Requires adjustment in renal impairment. From: K Alagiakrishnan, C A Wiens. (2004). An approach to drug induced delirium in the elderly. Postgrad Med J, 80, 388–393. Delirium in the Older Person: A Medical Emergency. Island Health www.viha.ca/mhas/resources/delirium/ Drugs that can cause delirium. Reviewed: 8-2014 Some commonly used medications with moderate to high anticholinergic properties and alternative suggestions Type of medication Alternatives with less deliriogenic
    [Show full text]
  • Cabergoline Patient Handout
    Cabergoline For the Patient: Cabergoline Other names: DOSTINEX® • Cabergoline (ca-BERG-go-leen) is used to treat cancers that cause the body to produce too much of a hormone called prolactin. Cabergoline helps decrease the size of the cancer and the production of prolactin. It is a tablet that you take by mouth. • Tell your doctor if you have ever had an unusual or allergic reaction to bromocriptine or other ergot derivatives, such as pergoline (PERMAX®) and methysergide (SANSERT®), before taking cabergoline. • Blood tests and blood pressure measurement may be taken while you are taking cabergoline. The dose of cabergoline may be changed based on the test results and/or other side effects. • It is important to take cabergoline exactly as directed by your doctor. Make sure you understand the directions. Take cabergoline with food. • If you miss a dose of cabergoline, take it as soon as you can if it is within 2 days of the missed dose. If it is over 2 days since your missed dose, skip the missed dose and go back to your usual dosing times. • Other drugs such as azithromycin (ZITHROMAX®), clarithromycin (BIAXIN®), erythromycin, domperidone, metoclopramide, and some drugs used to treat mental or mood problems may interact with cabergoline. Tell your doctor if you are taking these or any other drugs as you may need extra blood tests or your dose may need to be changed. Check with your doctor or pharmacist before you start or stop taking any other drugs. • The drinking of alcohol (in small amounts) does not appear to affect the safety or usefulness of cabergoline.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithium Stimulates Glutamate "Release" and Inositol 1,4,5
    Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 8358-8362, August 1994 Neurobiology Lithium stimulates glutamate "release" and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation via activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in monkey and mouse cerebral cortex slices (manic depression/bipolar disorder/primates) JOHN F. DIXON, GEORGYI V. Los, AND LOWELL E. HOKIN* Department of Pharmacology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706 Communicated by Henry Lardy, May 9, 1994 (received for review February 18, 1994) ABSTRACT Beginning at therapeutic concentrations (1- showed lithium-stimulated increases in Ins(1,4,5)P3 and 1.5 mM), the anti-manic-depressive drug lithium stimulated inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (2). the release of glutamate, a major excitatory neurotransmitter In the case of rhesus monkey, neither inositol nor an in the brain, in monkey cerebral cortex slices in a time- and agonist was required to demonstrate lithium-stimulated ac- concentration-dependent manner, and this was associated with cumulation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 (3). This suggested that an endog- increased inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3] accumu- enous neurotransmitter was involved in the lithium effect. lation. (±)-3-(2-Carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphoric We show here that, beginning at therapeutic concentrations, acid (CPP), dizocilpine (MK-801), ketamine, and Mg2+- lithium stimulated the release ofglutamate in rhesus monkey antagonists to the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) recep- and mouse cerebral cortex slices, and this in turn increased tor/channel complex selectively inhibited lithium-stimulated accumulation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 via activation of the N-methyl- Ins(t,4,5)P3 accumulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Advisory Committee Briefing
    Janssen Research & Development, LLC Advisory Committee Briefing Document Esketamine Nasal Spray for Patients with Treatment-resistant Depression JNJ-54135419 (esketamine) Status: Approved Date: 16 January 2019 Prepared by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC EDMS number: EDMS-ERI-171521650, 1.0 ADVISORY COMMITTEE BRIEFING MATERIALS: AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 1 Status: Approved, Date: 16 January 2019 JNJ-54135419 (esketamine) Treatment-resistant Depression Advisory Committee Briefing Document GUIDE FOR REVIEWERS This briefing document provides 3 levels of review with increasing levels of detail: The Executive Overview (Section 1, starting on page 11) provides a narrative summarizing the disease, need for novel treatments, key development program characteristics for esketamine nasal spray, study results, and conclusions. References are made to the respective supporting sections in the core document. The core document (Section 2 to Section 11, starting on page 30) includes detailed summaries and discussion in support of the Executive Overview. The appendices (starting on page 180) provide additional or more detailed information to complement brief descriptions provided in sections of the core document (e.g., demographic and baseline characteristics of the study populations, additional efficacy analyses in the Phase 3 studies, statistical methods). These appendices are referenced in the core document when relevant. This review structure allows review at varying levels of detail; however, reviewers who read at multiple levels will necessarily
    [Show full text]
  • Psychedelics in Psychiatry: Neuroplastic, Immunomodulatory, and Neurotransmitter Mechanismss
    Supplemental Material can be found at: /content/suppl/2020/12/18/73.1.202.DC1.html 1521-0081/73/1/202–277$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000056 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 73:202–277, January 2021 Copyright © 2020 by The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC Attribution 4.0 International license. ASSOCIATE EDITOR: MICHAEL NADER Psychedelics in Psychiatry: Neuroplastic, Immunomodulatory, and Neurotransmitter Mechanismss Antonio Inserra, Danilo De Gregorio, and Gabriella Gobbi Neurobiological Psychiatry Unit, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Abstract ...................................................................................205 Significance Statement. ..................................................................205 I. Introduction . ..............................................................................205 A. Review Outline ........................................................................205 B. Psychiatric Disorders and the Need for Novel Pharmacotherapies .......................206 C. Psychedelic Compounds as Novel Therapeutics in Psychiatry: Overview and Comparison with Current Available Treatments . .....................................206 D. Classical or Serotonergic Psychedelics versus Nonclassical Psychedelics: Definition ......208 Downloaded from E. Dissociative Anesthetics................................................................209 F. Empathogens-Entactogens . ............................................................209
    [Show full text]
  • PRESCRIBED DRUGS and NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS K a Grosset, D G Grosset Iii2
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2004.045757 on 16 August 2004. Downloaded from PRESCRIBED DRUGS AND NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS K A Grosset, D G Grosset iii2 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl III):iii2–iii8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.045757 treatment history is a fundamental part of the healthcare consultation. Current drugs (prescribed, over the counter, herbal remedies, drugs of misuse) and how they are taken A(frequency, timing, missed and extra doses), drugs tried previously and reason for discontinuation, treatment response, adverse effects, allergies, and intolerances should be taken into account. Recent immunisations may also be of importance. This article examines the particular relevance of medication in patients presenting with neurological symptoms. Drugs and their interactions may contribute in part or fully to the neurological syndrome, and treatment response may assist diagnostically or in future management plans. Knowledge of medicine taking behaviour may clarify clinical presentations such as analgesic overuse causing chronic daily headache, or severe dyskinesia resulting from obsessive use of dopamine replacement treatment. In most cases, iatrogenic symptoms are best managed by withdrawal of the offending drug. Indirect mechanisms whereby drugs could cause neurological problems are beyond the scope of the current article—for example, drugs which raise blood pressure or which worsen glycaemic control and consequently increase the risk of cerebrovascular disease, or immunosupressants
    [Show full text]