Spatial Perception and Progressive Addition Lenses
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Spatial perception and progressive addition lenses Peter Leslie Hendicott DipAppSc(Optom), MAppSc School of Optometry Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia A thesis in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2007 Keywords Progressive addition lenses, PAL, spatial perception, minimum displacement threshold, head movement Abstract Progressive addition lenses (PALs) are an increasingly preferred mode for the correction of presbyopia, gaining an increased share of the prescription lens market. Sales volumes are likely to increase over the next few years, given the increasing cohort of presbyopic patients in the population. This research investigated adaptation to PAL wear, investigating head movement parameters with and without progressive lenses in everyday visual tasks, and examined symptoms of spatial distortions and illusory movement in a crossover wearing trial of three PAL designs. Minimum displacement thresholds in the presence and absence of head movement were also investigated across the lens designs. Experiment 1 investigated head movements in two common visual tasks, a wordprocessing copy task, and a visual search task designed to replicate a natural environment task such as looking for products on supermarket shelving. Head movement parameters derived from this experiment were used to set head movement amplitude and velocity in the third experiment investigating minimum displacement thresholds across three PAL designs. Head movements were recorded with a Polhemus Inside Track head movement monitoring system which allows real time six degrees of freedom measurement of head position. Head position in azimuth, elevation and roll was extracted from the head movement recorder output, and data for head movement angular extent, average velocity (amplitude/duration) and peak velocity were calculated for horizontal head movements Results of the first experiment indicate a task dependent effect on head movement peak and average velocity, with both median head movement average and peak velocity being faster in the copy task. Visual task and visual processing demands were also shown to affect the slope of the main sequence of head movement velocity on head movement amplitude, with steeper slope in the copy task. A steeper slope, 2 indicating a faster head movement velocity for a given head movement amplitude, was found for head movements during the copy task than in the search task. Processing demands within the copy task were also shown to affect the main sequence slopes of velocity on amplitude, with flatter slopes associated with the need for head movement to bring gaze to a specific point. These findings indicate selective control over head movement velocity in response to differing visual processing demands. In Experiment 2, parameters of head movement amplitude and velocity were assessed in a group of first time PAL wearers. Head movement amplitude, average and peak velocity were calculated from head movement recordings using the search task, as in Experiment 1. Head movements were recorded without PALs, on first wearing a PAL, and after one month of PAL wear to assess adaptation effects. In contrast to existing literature, PAL wear did not alter parameters of head movement amplitude and velocity in a group of first time wearers either on first wearing the lenses or after one month of wear: this is due to task related effects in this experiment compared to previous work. Task demand in this experiment may not have required wearers to use the progressive power corridor to accomplish identification of visual search targets, in contrast to previous studies where experimental conditions were designed to force subjects to use the progressive corridor. In Experiment 3, minimum displacement thresholds for random dot stimuli were measured in a repeated measures experimental design for a single vision lens as control, and three PAL designs. Thresholds were measured in central vision, and for two locations in the temporal peripheral field, 30° temporal fixation and 10° above and below the horizontal midline. Thresholds were determined with and without the subjects’ head moving horizontally in an approximate sinusoidal movement at a frequency of about 0.7 Hz. Minimum displacement thresholds were not significantly affected by PAL design, although thresholds with PALs were higher than with a single vision lens control. Head movement significantly increased minimum displacement threshold across lens designs, by a factor of approximately 1.5 times. Results indicate that the local measures of minimum displacement threshold determined in this experiment are not sensitive to lens design differences. Sensitivity to motion with PAL lenses may be more a global than a localized response. 3 For Experiment 4, symptoms of spatial distortion and illusory movement were investigated in a crossover wearing trial of three PAL designs, and related to optical characteristics of the lenses. Peripheral back vertex powers of the PALs were measured at two locations in the right temporal zone of the lenses, 15.6 mm temporal to the fitting cross, and 2.7 m above and below the horizontal to the fitting cross. These locations corresponded to the zones of the lenses through which minimum displacement thresholds were measured in the previous experiment. The effect of subjects’ self movement on symptoms is able to discriminate between PAL designs, although subjective symptoms alone were not related to the lens design parameters studied. Subjects’ preference for one PAL design over the other designs studied in this experiment is inversely related to the effect on subject movement on their symptoms of distortion. An optical parameter, blur strength, derived from the power vector components of the peripheral powers, may indicate preference for particular PAL designs, as higher blur strength values are associated with lower lens preference scores. Head movement amplitude and velocity are task specific, and are also influenced by visual processing demands within tasks. PALs do not affect head movement amplitude and velocity unless tasks are made demanding or performed in less natural situations designed to influence head movement behaviour. Both head movement and PALs have large effects on minimum displacement thresholds; these effects may be due in part to complexity of the subjects’ task within the experiment. Minimum displacement thresholds however were not influenced by PAL design. The most sensitive indicator for subject’s preference of PALs was the effect of subjects’ self movement on their perception of symptoms, rather than the presence of actual symptoms. Blur strength should be further investigated for its role in PAL acceptance. 4 Table of contents List of figures and tables............................................................................................ 11 List of abbreviations................................................................................................... 20 List of abbreviations................................................................................................... 20 Statement of original authorship................................................................................ 21 Acknowledgements.................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 1 Introduction............................................................................................ 23 1.1 Outline of the thesis ..................................................................................... 24 1.2 Structure of the thesis................................................................................... 25 1.4 Aims ............................................................................................................. 26 Chapter 2 Progressive addition lenses: optical factors............................................... 27 2.1 Progressive lenses: an introduction.............................................................. 27 2.2 Optical factors and progressive lenses ......................................................... 27 2.2.1 Peripheral astigmatism.......................................................................... 27 2.2.2 Effects of prismatic power .................................................................... 30 2.3 PALs: Clinical trials..................................................................................... 32 Chapter 3 Apparent Motion ....................................................................................... 34 3.1 Random dot stimuli...................................................................................... 34 3.2 Other factors affecting displacement thresholds.......................................... 37 3.2.1 Spatial frequency................................................................................... 37 3.2.2 Eccentricity ........................................................................................... 38 3.3 Relationship to the experiments in this thesis.............................................. 40 Chapter 4 Head movements ....................................................................................... 41 4.1 Head movement and PALs .......................................................................... 41 4.2 Adaptation and PALs................................................................................... 44 4.3 “Swim” and PALs........................................................................................ 45 4.4 Velocity