DOCSLIB.ORG

The Functions of the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Functions of the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Functions of the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland Fifth Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 February 2005 HC 344 Published on 23 February 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Northern Ireland Office (but excluding individual cases and advice given by the Crown Solicitor); and other matters within the responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (but excluding the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Northern Ireland and the drafting of legislation by the Office of the Legislative Council). Current membership Mr Michael Mates MP (Conservative, East Hampshire) (Chairman) Mr Adrian Bailey MP (Labour / Co-operative, West Bromwich West) Mr Roy Beggs MP (Ulster Unionist Party, East Antrim) Mr Tony Clarke MP (Labour, Northampton South) Ms Iain Luke MP (Labour, Dundee East) Mr Eddy McGrady MP (Socialist Democratic Labour Party, South Down) Mr Stephen Pound MP (Labour, Ealing North) Mr Gregory Campbell MP (Democratic Unionist Party, East Londonderry) Mr Martin Smyth MP (Ulster Unionist Party, Belfast South)) Mr Hugo Swire MP (Conservative, East Devon) Mr Mark Tami MP (Labour, Alyn & Deeside) Mr Bill Tynan MP (Labour, Hamilton South) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/northern_ireland_affairs.cfm. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Dr John Patterson (Clerk), Hugh Farren (Attached Clerk), Dr Aileen O’Neill (Committee Specialist), Tony Catinella (Committee Assistant) and Chryssa Poupard (Secretary). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerks of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2172; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 2 The Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland 5 Review of the police complaints system 5 Statutory framework 7 Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 7 The Police (Northern Ireland) Acts 2000 and 2003 9 3 Progress by the Office of the Police Ombudsman 10 Establishing the Office 10 Progress of the Office 11 Case management system 13 Performance against targets 14 4 Public and police confidence 15 Police confidence 16 Independent oversight of the Office 18 5 Other Issues 20 Informal resolution 20 Mediation 21 Ombudsman’s remit 22 Police Ombudsman and young people 24 6 Conclusions 24 Conclusions and recommendations 26 Formal minutes 29 Witnesses 30 List of written evidence 31 3 Summary This is the first occasion on which the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland has been the subject of scrutiny by this committee. The task of establishing the Office has been considerable, and we have been impressed by the dedication and leadership demonstrated by Mrs Nuala O’Loan, the Police Ombudsman, and her staff, in constructing from scratch a credible police complaints service in Northern Ireland. The difficulty of this task was not eased by the failure of the government to provide Mrs O’Loan with formal guidance until May 2001, several months after the Office became operational. We are seeking an explanation from the government for this lapse. Despite the progress made in its first four years, the operations of the Office are not yet fully satisfactory. Improvements can and must be made: x The Office is proceeding with a replacement IT system because the existing system has proved inadequate after only four years. The Northern Ireland Office (NIO) must ensure that the Office has the resources and skills to procure and install a cost effective and fully efficient system with a reasonable life span. x The Ombudsman’s powers of mediation require to be streamlined to provide extra flexibility when dealing with complaints. This is likely to require legislation which we hope the government will consider and facilitate quickly. x While the Office’s standing with the general public now appears good, its standing with police officers of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) is less so. We recognise that the relationship between the police and those ‘policing the police’ will always present very considerable management challenges. There is no ‘quick fix’ here, and progress is likely to be incremental. The managements of the Office and PSNI have taken steps to ensure sound communication. The Office must persevere in these efforts and, by punctilious regard to transparent investigative procedures of the highest professional quality, gain the respect and confidence of growing numbers of rank and file officers. x The effectiveness of the new policing arrangements in Northern Ireland depends, in very large measure, upon the main players maintaining excellent mutual co- operation. The relationship between the Northern Ireland Policing Board and the Office could be improved. These bodies need to take steps to ensure that their working relationship is fully satisfactory at all levels. x The present arrangements for investigating complaints of maladministration against the Ombudsman should be given the opportunity to ‘bed down’. Ministers, as well as officials should invariably see such complaints. They have not done so in the past. We are pleased that Mr Ian Pearson, Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Northern Ireland Office, and the Minister responsible for security and policing, has given us a firm commitment that this will now happen. The Department should publish the number and outcome of such complaints in its Annual 4 Departmental Report as a matter of routine. A heavy responsibility rests on those concerned directly with policing in Northern Ireland to sustain and build up the confidence of the general public in the new policing arrangements. This will be achieved where all those involved in policing matters apply exemplary professional standards consistently to their work. Where standards slip, public confidence will erode. Nowhere does the responsibility rest more heavily for ensuring that the public have confidence in their police service than on the Ombudsman and her staff. We do not underestimate the difficulties of her task. This report highlights how much has been achieved since the Office was established in 2000; and how much remains to be done. We trust that when we next examine the Office, the achievements to date will have provided a secure and sustainable basis for further development. 5 1 Introduction 1. The Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland was formally set up on 6 November 2000 under the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 (‘the 1998 Act’).1 Its principal function is to secure an efficient, effective and independent police complaints system in Northern Ireland, and to secure the confidence of both the public and the police in that system. The Office forms a key part of the new accountability arrangements for policing in Northern Ireland, which include the Northern Ireland Policing Board, District Policing Partnerships, and the Office of the Oversight Commissioner.2 2. Over three years have passed since the foundation of the Office, and the purpose of our inquiry was to examine progress made in this crucial initial phase. On 10 February 2004, the committee announced the inquiry’s terms of reference: x Progress towards developing a role for the Police Ombudsman since the Office was established in November 2000 x The performance of the Office in respect of its principal activities, and x The efficiency and effectiveness of the administration and expenditure of the Office, including its performance against key indicators and targets 3. We took oral evidence on two occasions and are grateful to all those who provided evidence to us. We paid an informal visit to the Office of the Police Ombudsman in April 2004, and we are grateful to Mrs O’Loan and her staff for the informative briefing we received. We wish to thank Dr Keith Bryett , Specialist Advisor, for his assistance 2 The Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland Review of the police complaints system 4. Public complaints against the police in Northern Ireland were recorded and investigated by police officers of the Complaints and Discipline Department of the Royal Ulster 1 The Northern Ireland Office stated in evidence that it appointed Mrs Nuala O’Loan as Police Ombudsman in October 1999 (PONI 27). She took up her full-time designate responsibilities in April 2000. The Office of the Police Ombudsman was formally set up in November 2000 when Part VII of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 came into force 2 These bodies were set up following the report of the Independent Commission on Policing (‘The Patten report’), A New Beginning: Policing in Northern Ireland, The Report of the Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland, September 1999. The Northern Ireland Policing Board was established in November 2001, replacing the Police Authority for Northern Ireland which had been responsible for police accountability since 1970. The Board’s principal function is to hold the Chief Constable and the police publicly accountable for the performance of their functions and to ensure that the police service is efficient and effective.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (PCO0010) Written Evidence Submitted by Dr Graham Smith
    (PCO0010) Written evidence submitted by Dr Graham Smith, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Manchester (COR0010) Introduction 1. I am a Senior Lecturer in Regulation at the University of Manchester and serve as a consultant on human rights, specialising in police misconduct and complaints, to the Council of Europe. I have close to 40 years of experience in the field as complainant, civil rights activist, consultant and researcher. Since completing my doctoral thesis Police Crime: A Constitutional Perspective in 1998 I have published widely in academic journals. In 2009 I drafted the Opinion of the Commissioner for Human Rights Concerning Independent and Effective Determination of Complaints Against the Police and in 2011-12 led research commissioned by Greater Manchester, West Midlands and British Transport Police on Disproportionality in police professional standards. In September 2020 Palgrave Macmillan published On the Wrong Side of The Law: Complaints Against Metropolitan Police, 1829-1964, the first of a two volume study of complaints against officers serving with the Metropolitan Police. Complaints reform 2. Police complaints were first codified in England and Wales under Section 49 of the Police Act 1964. Since then there has been a gradual transfer of responsibility for handling complaints from police forces to non-police bodies. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is the fourth statutory police complaints oversight body. 3. For close to forty years the Home Affairs Committee (HAC) have played a prominent role
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Policing Board Annual Report and Accounts Together with the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General
    ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE PERIOD 1 APRIL 2008 - 31 MARCH 2009 CORPORATE VISION To secure for all the people of Northern Ireland an effective, efficient, impartial, representative and accountable police service which will secure the confidence of the whole community by reducing crime and the fear of crime. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE PERIOD 1 APRIL 2008 - 31 MARCH 2009 Northern Ireland Policing Board Annual Report and Accounts together with the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General. Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraph 7(3) b of Schedule 2 of the Police (NI) Act 2000. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 July 2009. HC 674 London: The Stationery Office £26.60 © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 9780102948653 Contents Page 03 01 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD 04 02 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S FOREWORD 09 03 MEMBERSHIP OF THE NORTHERN IRELAND POLICING BOARD 11 04 MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY 14 Background and principal
    [Show full text]
  • St 9617 2004 Dcl 1
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 November 2020 (OR. en) 9617/04 DCL 1 LIMITE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 DECLASSIFICATION of document: 9617/04 RESTREINT UE dated: 17 May 2004 new status: LIMITE Subject: Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 9617/04 DCL 1 KAL SMART 2.C.S1 LIMITE EN RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 17 May 2004 THE EUROPEAN UNION 9617/04 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 NOTE from : UK delegation to : Schengen Evaluation Working Party No. prev. doc. : 9227/04 SCH-EVAL 25 COMIX 308 + ADD 1 Subject : Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK The United Kingdom has asked the Schengen Evaluation Group to undertake an evaluation of the data protection arrangements which it has in place to support the introduction of the Schengen Information System to the UK. As the UK’s technical solution to the SIS has not yet been finalised, the questions relate only to data protection arrangements. Questions relating to the management and handling of the data will be answered in the context of the full SIS evaluation which will take place once the UK’s national solution has been fully implemented. 1. Provide the list of services with access to SIS data See Annex A and Annex B 9617/04 WvdR/kve 1 DG H RESTREINT UE EN RESTREINT UE 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. em, o. Commission for Commission des RoubylccComanadra,171Agnatztpthoiece plaintes du public contre la r Genclarrnene royale du Canada a COMMISSION FOR PUBLIC COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE RCMP 111 Police Investigating Police FINAL PUBLIC REPORT A Chair-initiated complaint and public interest investigation into public concerns about the impartiality of RCMP members conducting criminal investigations into other RCMP members in cases involving serious injury death.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI) DATA SHEET
    Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI) DATA SHEET There is probably no other State in the world that has undergone a similar process of profound and intense transformation in its conceptions, structures, practices and policing model as has Northern Ireland since the second half of the nineties. One of the most important figures that resulted from this reform is that of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI), undoubtedly the most modern and powerful police external oversight mechanism in the world and a mandatory reference for any scholar or specialist interested in police accountability. Here is a data sheet with the most important aspects of this mechanism. Corporate Governance . The Police Ombudsman is appointed by Her Majesty, as a named person for a fixed term of seven years. His Office has 150 staff and an annual operating budget of around 9 million pounds . The Office of the Police Ombudsman is situated in Belfast and provides a continuous service 24 hours a day to the people and police of Northern Ireland. The Police Ombudsman is accountable to the Northern Ireland Assembly, through the Minister for Justice. The status of the Office of the Police Ombudsman is that of a non-departmental public body (NDPB) administrated through the Department of Justice. The Office does not carry out its functions on behalf of the Crown. The Police Ombudsman also investigates complaints against the Belfast Harbour Police, Larne Harbour Police, the Belfast International Airport Police and Ministry of Defence Police in Northern Ireland and the Serious Organised Crime Agency when its staff operates in this jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Victim Charter a Charter for Victims of Crime
    Victim Charter A Charter for victims of crime September 2015 VICTIM CHARTER Victim Charter VICTIM CHARTER VICTIM CHARTER Victim Charter A Charter for Victims of Crime Laid before the Northern Ireland Assembly by the Department of Justice under section 31(2) of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2015 September 2015 VICTIM CHARTER VICTIM CHARTER VICTIM CHARTER Contents Page no Overview of the key entitlements in the Victim Charter 5 Short guide to the criminal justice system 9 • Overview of service providers 9 • Criminal justice system guide 10 • Summary flowchart of the criminal justice process 13 Introduction 14 • Purpose of the Charter 14 • Who is this Charter for? 15 • Who can get services under the Charter? 15 • Who has to provide services under the Charter? 17 • General entitlements 18 • What if I don’t get the services I should? 21 • Can I comment on the Charter or services provided under it? 21 • Alternative formats 21 Special measures and additional support for victims with particular needs 22 • Assessment of your needs 22 • Additional support for victims with particular needs 23 Section 1: Reporting a crime and the police investigation 30 • Reporting a crime 30 • Information provided when reporting a crime 31 • Police investigation 33 • Progress of the police investigation 35 • Police alternative disposal and referral to the Public Prosecution Service 36 • Help from victim support service providers (whether or not you report a crime) 36 Section 2: Will it go to court (pre trial)? 38 • Victim and Witness Care Unit 38 • Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • 90203NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. I." :-:')'," , ~c">"'" ill' .. "J! . l' 0, • ~l ! 1 o ,~ ..~ . .;I' ,.}/" 'v {f. REPORT OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE '\ WEST MIDLANDS POLICE ,j FOR THE J I YEAR 1982 U.S. Department of Justice 90203 National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or orgamzation originating It. Pomts of vIew or opimons stated in this document are tho..le of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official posltJon or polIcies of the National Institute of JustIce. Chief Constable's Office PermIssion to reproduce this COPYrighted material has been Lloyd House granted by Colmore Circus Queensway --tio...r:J:humhria .-l?o...l.J..ce-__ ~. __ Birmingham 84 6NQ He adquar_t e r S ___ 'h._____ _ to the National Criminal Justice Reference SelVice (NCJRS). Further reproduction outSide of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the cOPYright owner. r WEST MIDLANDS POLICE I. MEMBERS OF THE POLICE AUTHORITY Chairman: Councillor E T Shore (Birmingham, SaZtley) I ; Vice-Chairman: ·Co~ncillor T J Savage (Birmingham, Erdington) Local Authority Representatives Magistrate Members Ward Councillor D M Ablett (Dudley, No. 6) J D Baker Esq JP FCA Councillor D Benny JP (Birmingham, Sandwell) K H Barker Esq Councillor E I Bentley (MerideiYl, No.1) OBE DL JP FRIeS Councillor D Fysh (Wolverhampton. No.4) Captain. J E Heydon Councillor J Hunte (Birmingbam, Handsworth) ERD JP Councillor K RIson (Stourbridge, No.1) S B Jackson EsqJP FCA Councillor
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Greater Public Confidence
    Towards greater public confidence A personal review of the current police complaints system for England and Wales Deborah Glass Commissioner Independent Police Complaints Commission March 2014 Foreword I will soon be stepping down after thirteen years of working within the police complaints system: ten years as a Commissioner of the Independent Police Complaints Commission from its inception and three years before that as a Member of the departing Police Complaints Authority. Ten years into its existence the IPCC is poised to expand its investigative remit to “all serious and sensitive cases”. But is this enough to generate public confidence, or does the system itself need reforming? Much has been said and written about the police complaints system in England and Wales over many decades – from academic treatises and Parliamentary reports to tirades and blogs. Some speak from direct personal experience – of how their complaint was dealt with, or the investigation into the death of a loved one. Others reflect collected experience, from the point of view of a campaign group, and yet others reflect a personal or political ideology. This paper reflects my own experience. In the past thirteen years I have dealt with complaints ranging from the most serious and substantiated allegations of criminal conduct by police officers, through the many, varied and understandable gripes of people dissatisfied with the police, to the frivolous and occasionally malicious. From that experience, I have no doubt that, while there have been improvements over the years and some real success stories, the system needs major reform. It has in fact needed it for decades, and has suffered from repeated piecemeal attempts at reform that tighten a bolt in the engine while loosening a few screws in the chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 March 2016
    ANNUAL RE PO & ACCO R UN TS T For the year ended 31 March 2016 Together with the Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General for Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2016 Together with the Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General for Northern Ireland The Annual Report is laid before the Northern Ireland Assembly by the Department of Justice in accordance with section 61(5) (a) of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998. The Statement of Accounts together with the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General for Northern Ireland are laid before the Assembly in accordance with paragraph 12(2) Schedule 3 to that Act as amended by the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Devolution of Policing and Justice Functions) Order 2010. on 30 June 2016 Glossary of Abbreviations ACPO Association of Chief Police Officers AEP Attenuating Energy Projectile C&AG Comptroller and Auditor General CARE Career Average Related Earnings CCTV Closed Circuit Television CETV Cash Equivalent Transfer Value CHS Case Handling System CJINI Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland CPD Continuous Professional Development CPI Consumer Prices Index CSP Civil Service Pensions DFP Department of Finance and Personnel DoJ Department of Justice FReM Financial Reporting Manual FTE Full Time Equivalent HIU Historic Investigations Unit HMIC Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary IAS International Accounting Standards IASB International Accounting Standards Board IFRS International
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the American Police: Wrestling with the Problems of Democracy Samuel Walker
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2016 Article 15 2016 Governing the American Police: Wrestling with the Problems of Democracy Samuel Walker Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Walker, Samuel (2016) "Governing the American Police: Wrestling with the Problems of Democracy," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2016 , Article 15. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2016/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Governing the American Police: Wrestling with the Problems of Democracy Samuel Walkert I. INTRODUCTION: GOVERNING THE AMERICAN POLICE-AND THE PROBLEM WITH DEMOCRACY Winston Churchill, the famed Prime Minister of England, once observed that "it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."' Churchill's trenchant remark well states the problem of governing the police in the United States. For many decades, and not simply in the period since the tragic events in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014, critics of the police have charged that the police are "out of control," 2 and a "law unto themselves," 3 acting with little regard for the law and standards of human decency. The melancholic truth, however, is that the police are not out of control in terms of democratic self- government. City police forces, which are the focus of our current national police crisis and also the subject of this Article, are directly controlled by popularly elected mayors and city councils.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking
    MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AN INSPECTION OF HOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM DEALS WITH MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN NORTHERN IRELAND OCTOBER 2020 MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AN INSPECTION OF HOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM DEALS WITH MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN NORTHERN IRELAND. OCTOBER 2020 Laid before the Northern Ireland Assembly under Section 49(2) of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002 (as amended by paragraph 7(2) of Schedule 13 to The Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Devolution of Policing and Justice Functions) Order 2010) by the Department of Justice. ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AN INSPECTION OF HOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM DEALS WITH MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN NORTHERN IRELAND OCTOBER 2020 FOREWORD INSPECTOR’S CHIEF CONTENTS SUMMARY EXECUTIVE List of abbreviations 2 Chief Inspector’s Foreword 4 Executive summary 6 Recommendations 10 RECOMMENDATIONS Inspection Report Chapter 1: Introduction 15 Chapter 2: Strategy and governance 22 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: Chapter 3: Delivery 50 Chapter 4: Outcomes 95 Appendices GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGY CHAPTER 2: Appendix 1 Methodology and terms of reference 108 Appendix 2 Typology of the types of modern slavery offences in the United Kingdom 114 Appendix 3 United Nations Human Trafficking Indicators 117 DELIVERY CHAPTER 3: OUTCOMES CHAPTER 4: APPENDICES 1 ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AN INSPECTION OF HOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM DEALS WITH MODERN SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Lords' Interests
    REGISTER OF LORDS’ INTERESTS _________________ The following Members of the House of Lords have registered relevant interests under the code of conduct: ABERDARE, Lord Category 1: Directorships Director, WALTZ Programmes Limited (training for work/apprenticeships in London) Director, Twist Partnership Limited (promoting leadership through learning) Category 2: Remunerated employment, office, profession etc. Publications Consultant, Freemasons' Grand Charity (irregular employment) Category 10: Non-financial interests (c) Trustee, Berlioz Society Trustee, St John Cymru-Wales Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Trustee, West Wycombe Charitable Trust ADAMS OF CRAIGIELEA, Baroness Nil No registrable interests ADDINGTON, Lord Category 1: Directorships Chairman, Microlink PC (UK) Ltd (computing and software) Category 10: Non-financial interests (d) Vice President, British Dyslexia Association Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Vice President, UK Sports Association Vice President, Lakenham Hewitt Rugby Club ADEBOWALE, Lord Category 1: Directorships Director, Leadership in Mind Ltd Non-executive Director, St Vincent Healthcare (retains 5% shares in this organisation) Category 2: Remunerated employment, office, profession etc. Chief Executive Officer, Turning Point (social care registered charity) Occasional income from broadcasting is paid to Turning Point Commissioner, Audit Commission Category 4: Shareholdings (b) St Vincent Healthcare Category 5: Land and property Flat in London from which rental income is received Category 6: Sponsorship Research and secretarial assistance is provided and paid for by Turning Point Category 10: Non-financial interests (a) Company Secretary, Turning Point Category 10: Non-financial interests (b) Chancellor (visiting Professor), Lincoln University Commissioner, UK Commission for Employment and Skills ADONIS, Lord Category 1: Directorships Non-executive Director, Dods (Group) plc (public affairs and policy communications) Category 2: Remunerated employment, office, profession etc.
    [Show full text]