Northern Ireland
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Supplement to the London Gazette, Hth June 1987 B23
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, HTH JUNE 1987 B23 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (Am FORCE DEPARTMENT) Malcolm Robert POPPERWELL, Assistant Chief Constable, Avon and Somerset Constabulary. Squadron Leader Philip Desmond DYE (5201059), Ronald William RUMSBY, Chief Superintendent, Royal Air Force. Suffolk Constabulary. Wing Commander Richard Skene PEACOCK- Colin Roderick SMITH, C.V.O., Chief Constable, EDWARDS (5200226), Royal Air Force. Thames Valley Police. Squadron Leader George William PIXTON Richard Burton WELLS, Deputy Assistant (8018671), Royal Air Force. Commissioner, Metropolitan Police. NORTHERN IRELAND MINISTRY OF DEFENCE George Campbell JACKSON, Chief Superintendent, WHITEHALL, LONDON, S.W.I. Royal Ulster Constabulary. 13th June 1987 William McGREEGHAN, Sergeant, Royal Ulster Constabulary. THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, to approve the award of the Air Force Medal to the HONG KONG undermentioned: Frederick Samual McCOSH, C.P.M., Assistant MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY DEPARTMENT) Commissioner, Royal Hong Kong Police Force. Donald McFarlane WATSON, C.P.M., Assistant Air Force Medal Commissioner, Royal Hong Kong Police Force. A.F.M. 24114776 Staff Sergeant Francis WALKER, Army Air Corps. SCOTTISH OFFICE NEW ST ANDREW'S HOUSE, EDINBURGH 13th June 1987 THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the HOME OFFICE occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, QUEEN ANNE'S GATE, LONDON s.w.i to approve the award of The Queen's Police Medal for 13th June 1987 Distinguished Service to the undermentioned: THE QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on the Queen's Police Medal occasion of the Celebration of Her Majesty's Birthday, to approve the award of The Queen's Police Medal for Q.P.M. -
Download the May 2016 Magazine
May 2016 | Issue 86 NARPO THE MAGAZINE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONnews OF RETIRED POLICE OFFICERS NARPO - the voice of retired police officers ‘To safeguard the rights of members and to promote measures for their welfare, with particular regards to pensions’ 2 NARPOnews Independent Financial Advice Exclusive offer for NARPO members Are you thinking about releasing funds from the equity in your home? Raising funds from your home using Equity Release could be one of the most important decisions you make in your life. Our advisors have been advising NARPO members for many years and in recent years have arranged a substantial number of Equity Release plans. We only recommend plans covered by the Equity Release Council (ERC) and we never use pressurised selling techniques. We can help you decide if equity release is right for you For something as important as Equity Release we will always fully review your financial circumstances to make sure we fully understand your objectives and the options available to you before making a recommendation to proceed. We only make a charge if you go ahead with the plan. Our fee is £675 upon completion of the plan. We will also be paid a commission from the provider in addition to the fee we have charged you and this will always be disclosed on the keyfacts illustration. This is a Lifetime Mortgage or a Home Reversion plan. In order that you understand the features and risks, we will always provide a personalised illustration following consultation. The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate tax advice. CHECK THAT THIS MORTGAGE WILL MEET YOUR NEEDS IF YOU WANT TO MOVE OR SELL YOUR HOME OR YOU WANT YOUR FAMILY TO INHERIT IT. -
Examining the Test: an Evaluation of the Police Standard Entrance Test. INSTITUTION Scottish Council for Research in Education
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 415 249 TM 027 914 AUTHOR Wilson, Valerie; Glissov, Peter; Somekh, Bridget TITLE Examining the Test: An Evaluation of the Police Standard Entrance Test. INSTITUTION Scottish Council for Research in Education. SPONS AGENCY Scottish Office Education and Industry Dept., Edinburgh. ISBN ISBN-0-7480-5554-1 ISSN ISSN-0950-2254 PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 104p. AVAILABLE FROM HMSO Bookshop, 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh, EH3 9AZ; Scotland, United Kingdom (5 British pounds). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Employment Qualifications; Foreign Countries; Job Skills; Minority Groups; *Occupational Tests; *Police; Test Bias; *Test Interpretation; Test Use; *Testing Problems IDENTIFIERS *Scotland ABSTRACT In June 1995, the Scottish Council for Research in Education began a 5-month study of the Standard Entrance Examination (SET) to the police in Scotland. The first phase was an analysis of existing recruitment and selection statistics from the eight Scottish police forces. Phase Two was a study of two police forces using a case study methodology: Identified issues were then circulated using the Delphi approach to all eight forces. There was a consensus that both society and the police are changing, and that disparate functional maps of a police officer's job have been developed. It was generally recognized that recruitment and selection are important, but time-consuming, aspects of police activity. Wide variations were found in practices across the eight forces, including the use of differential pass marks for the SET. Independent assessors have identified anomalies in the test indicating that it is both ambiguous and outdated in part, with differences in the readability of different versions that compromises comparability. -
Not Protectively Marked
. Agenda Item No. TAYSIDE JOINT POLICE BOARD 29 January 2007 Report by the Chief Constable No. PB 8/2007 SUBJECT: MONIFIETH POLICE STATION RELOCATION Abstract: Members are advised that agreement has been reached in principle with Angus Council for the co-location of Police and Council services in Monifieth and for the subsequent sale of the existing Police Station site to the Council. Members are also advised of the intention to provide shared public access facilities at Friockheim and Muirhead police premises. 1. RECOMMENDATION 1.1 It is recommended that the Board (a) note the intention to progress an agreement between the Force and Angus Council to co-locate, subject to suitable leasing terms, policing services in the Monifieth area within the existing local authority premises in the town. (b) approve, in principle and subject to (a) above, to declare the existing Monifieth Police Station and site surplus to operational requirements (c) in accordance with Financial Regulations 15.1 instruct the Chief Constable to enter into formal discussions for the sale of the property to Angus Council at a fair market value as professionally advised. (d) delegate to the Chief Constable and Clerk to negotiate and agree the terms of the above. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Tayside Police has undertaken a number of shared facilities arrangements with Angus Council under the umbrella of the Angus Community Safety Partnership for some time. These include the sharing of premises for the Community Safety Team at Kirriemuir Police Station, co-location of the Family Protection Unit and Social Work staff at council premises in Arbroath and recently, Peripatetic Wardens based at the new Police and Community Access Office at Letham. -
Northern Ireland Policing Board Annual Report and Accounts Together with the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE PERIOD 1 APRIL 2008 - 31 MARCH 2009 CORPORATE VISION To secure for all the people of Northern Ireland an effective, efficient, impartial, representative and accountable police service which will secure the confidence of the whole community by reducing crime and the fear of crime. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE PERIOD 1 APRIL 2008 - 31 MARCH 2009 Northern Ireland Policing Board Annual Report and Accounts together with the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General. Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraph 7(3) b of Schedule 2 of the Police (NI) Act 2000. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 July 2009. HC 674 London: The Stationery Office £26.60 © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 9780102948653 Contents Page 03 01 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD 04 02 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S FOREWORD 09 03 MEMBERSHIP OF THE NORTHERN IRELAND POLICING BOARD 11 04 MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY 14 Background and principal -
St 9617 2004 Dcl 1
Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 November 2020 (OR. en) 9617/04 DCL 1 LIMITE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 DECLASSIFICATION of document: 9617/04 RESTREINT UE dated: 17 May 2004 new status: LIMITE Subject: Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 9617/04 DCL 1 KAL SMART 2.C.S1 LIMITE EN RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 17 May 2004 THE EUROPEAN UNION 9617/04 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 NOTE from : UK delegation to : Schengen Evaluation Working Party No. prev. doc. : 9227/04 SCH-EVAL 25 COMIX 308 + ADD 1 Subject : Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK The United Kingdom has asked the Schengen Evaluation Group to undertake an evaluation of the data protection arrangements which it has in place to support the introduction of the Schengen Information System to the UK. As the UK’s technical solution to the SIS has not yet been finalised, the questions relate only to data protection arrangements. Questions relating to the management and handling of the data will be answered in the context of the full SIS evaluation which will take place once the UK’s national solution has been fully implemented. 1. Provide the list of services with access to SIS data See Annex A and Annex B 9617/04 WvdR/kve 1 DG H RESTREINT UE EN RESTREINT UE 2. -
Copyright Notice
Copyright Notice Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland All material contained in this document was scanned from an original printed copy of Intercom magazine produced by the Directorate of Telecommunications in January 1975. The licence granted by HMSO to re-publish this document does not extend to using the material for the principal purpose of advertising or promoting a particular product or service, or in a way, which could imply endorsement by a Department, or generally in a manner, which is likely to mislead others. No rights are conferred under the terms of the HMSO Licence to anyone else wishing to publish this material, without first having sought a licence to use such material from HMSO in the first instance. Signed Steven R. Cole 29 th February 2004 \ INTERCOM The Journal of the Home Office Directorate of Telecommunications Number 6 January 1975 INTERCOM The Journal of the Home Office Directorate of Telecommunications Number 6 January 1975 INTERCOIVI is published twice each year by the Directorate and is printed for Her Majesty's Stationery Office by Peridon Ltd, 6 Dalston Gardens, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 1BJ. No article or any part of an article appearing in it may be reprinted or quoted without permission of the Home Office. Opinions expressed in this magazine are not necessarily official views of the Home Office. All enquiries should be directed to the Editor, INTERCOM, Directorate of Telecommunications, 60 Rochester Row, London SW1, England. Telephone Number: 01-828 9848, Extension 739. © Crown Copyright~1975 Contents Communications 74 .......... -
Archived Content Contenu Archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. em, o. Commission for Commission des RoubylccComanadra,171Agnatztpthoiece plaintes du public contre la r Genclarrnene royale du Canada a COMMISSION FOR PUBLIC COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE RCMP 111 Police Investigating Police FINAL PUBLIC REPORT A Chair-initiated complaint and public interest investigation into public concerns about the impartiality of RCMP members conducting criminal investigations into other RCMP members in cases involving serious injury death. -
Ministerial Correspondence Template
Caroline Wall Maritime Security Compliance and Ports Policy Maritime Security & Resilience Division Department for Transport Zone 2/32 Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Mr D Llewelyn Tel: 020 7944 6252 E-Mail: [email protected] e-mail: Web site: www.gov.uk/dft [email protected] Our Ref : P0015467 15 December 2017 Dear Mr Llewelyn FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REGARDING PORT POLICE FORCES’ USE OF SECTION 7 OF THE MARINE NAVIGATION ACT Thank you for your information request of 20 November. You requested the following information: “On the 3rd July 2014 a written question was asked of the Secretary of State for Transport in relation to Ports Police and section 7 of the Marine Navigation Act 2013. The reply was made by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary on 9th July. I have copied the relevant extract from Hansard below: "Police: Ports:Written question - 203891 Q Asked by Tom Blenkinsop (Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland) Asked on: 03 July 2014 Department for Transport Police: Ports 203891 To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the extent to which chief officers of territorial police forces have used the Marine Navigation Act 2013 to permit port constables to act outside their port area for policing purposes connected with the port constable's police area. A Answered by: Stephen Hammond Answered on: 09 July 2014 Of the six English port police forces, able to use the Marine Navigation Act, the port police forces for Bristol, Dover and Teesport have sought and received the consent of the Chief Constable of the relevant territorial police force to exercise certain powers outside their port area, while a fourth, Liverpool Port Police, is currently seeking it." Please provide any relevant correspondence/information/documents that were used to assist the Parliamentary Under-Secretary in giving this answer. -
Mersey Tunnels Long Term Operations & Maintenance
Mersey Tunnels Long Term Operations & Maintenance Strategy Contents Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Strategic Overview .................................................................................................................................. 2 Supporting Economic Regeneration ................................................................................................... 3 Key Route Network ............................................................................................................................. 6 National Tolling Policy ......................................................................................................................... 8 Legislative Context .................................................................................................................................. 9 Mersey Crossing Demand ..................................................................................................................... 12 Network Resilience ........................................................................................................................... 14 Future Demand ................................................................................................................................. 14 Tunnel Operations ................................................................................................................................ 17 Supporting Infrastructure -
Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI) DATA SHEET
Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI) DATA SHEET There is probably no other State in the world that has undergone a similar process of profound and intense transformation in its conceptions, structures, practices and policing model as has Northern Ireland since the second half of the nineties. One of the most important figures that resulted from this reform is that of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI), undoubtedly the most modern and powerful police external oversight mechanism in the world and a mandatory reference for any scholar or specialist interested in police accountability. Here is a data sheet with the most important aspects of this mechanism. Corporate Governance . The Police Ombudsman is appointed by Her Majesty, as a named person for a fixed term of seven years. His Office has 150 staff and an annual operating budget of around 9 million pounds . The Office of the Police Ombudsman is situated in Belfast and provides a continuous service 24 hours a day to the people and police of Northern Ireland. The Police Ombudsman is accountable to the Northern Ireland Assembly, through the Minister for Justice. The status of the Office of the Police Ombudsman is that of a non-departmental public body (NDPB) administrated through the Department of Justice. The Office does not carry out its functions on behalf of the Crown. The Police Ombudsman also investigates complaints against the Belfast Harbour Police, Larne Harbour Police, the Belfast International Airport Police and Ministry of Defence Police in Northern Ireland and the Serious Organised Crime Agency when its staff operates in this jurisdiction. -
Serious Case Review Into Child Sexual Exploitation in Oxfordshire: from the Experiences of Children A, B, C, D, E, and F
Serious Case Review into Child Sexual Exploitation in Oxfordshire: from the experiences of Children A, B, C, D, E, and F Approved by the OSCB February 26th 2015 Update14.3.15 Independent Reviewer: Alan Bedford MA (Social Work), Dip.Crim FOREWORD i. What happened to the child victims of the sexual exploitation in Oxfordshire was indescribably awful, and a number of perpetrators are serving long periods of imprisonment following the investigation known as ‘Operation Bullfinch’. The child victims and their families feel very let down. Their accounts of how they perceived professional work are disturbing and chastening. There is clearly a demand to find out how such extensive abuse could have continued for so long before it was properly identified, and why there was not speedier action. There was a strong public reaction last year and this year to two Rotherham inquiries (which were not Serious Case Reviews) and to similar concerns reported elsewhere, and there have been calls in such cases for individuals to be held to account. ii. The Serious Case Review (SCR) has seen no evidence of wilful professional neglect or misconduct by organisations, but there was at times a worrying lack of curiosity and follow through, and much work should have been considerably different and better. There is little evidence that the local understanding of child sexual exploitation (CSE), or how to tackle it once identified, was significantly different from many parts of the country. iii. On the surface, many of the illustrations described in the report can seem like professional ineptitude, unconcern, or inaction. They become more understandable when put in the context of the knowledge and processes at the time, practical difficulties around evidence, and a professional mind-set which could not grasp that the victims’ ability to say ‘no’ had been totally eroded.