Induced Infestation of Fruit by the Caribbean Frubt Fly, Anastrepha Suspensa (Loew)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Induced Infestation of Fruit by the Caribbean Frubt Fly, Anastrepha Suspensa (Loew) 386 FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1974 INDUCED INFESTATION OF FRUIT BY THE CARIBBEAN FRUBT FLY, ANASTREPHA SUSPENSA (LOEW) A. K. Burditt, Jr., D. von Windeguth and mitis Blanco), kumquat (Fortunella crassifolia R. J. Knight, Jr. Swingle), Surinam cherry (Eugenia uniflora L.), rose apples (Syzygium jambos (L.) Alst.), Bar Subtropical Horticulture Research Unit bados cherry (Malpighia glabra L.), peach ARS, U.S.D.A. (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch), and other soft Miami fruits. Swanson added loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.) and tropical almond (Terminalia Abstract. Several cultivars or seedlings of caiappa L.) to the list of major hosts. He also mango, guava, grapefruit, murcott, and other presented information about the monthly infesta fruit were exposed in an outdoor cage containing tion of the major host species. These data were a large population of Caribbean fruit flies or by obtained by holding fruit in polyethylene contain injection of fruit fly eggs into the fruit. Varia ers and allowing the fruit fly larvae to emerge tion in susceptibility of species and varieties of from the fruit and drop to the bottom of the con fruit was determined. tainer where they pupated in vermiculite. Thus he Infestations in grapefruit ranged as high as could state that lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.), 10.6, 13.3, and 57.4 larvae/kg of fruit for natural, mango, and several types of citrus were occasion injected and cage infested fruit, respectively. ally infested and that only a few species of fruit Guavas, a natural host, supported infestations of were not, among them breadnut (Brosimum ali- 28.8 and 113 larvae/kg when the infestations castrum SW.), Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauriti- were natural and cage-induced. Temple and mur ana Lamb.), karanda (Carissa carandas L.), and cott oranges exposed to cage infestations aver Calophyllum inophyllum L. aged 2.5 and 21.0 larvae/kg, respectively. Likewise, von Windeguth et al. (5) examined Cage infestations of mangos ranged to 163.9 the fluctuations in infestations of Caribbean fruit larvae/kg. Cultivars and selections of mangos fly larvae in the preferred hosts on the island of showed high variability; some were highly in Key West, which was to be the site of an attempt fested, and one remained uninfested. to suppress the fly population by using the sterile This research was undertaken to obtain in fly release method. They found that guava and formation needed for developing commodity treat tropical almond were the primary hosts of the ments for use by quarantine personnel in approv Caribbean fruit fly in the test area and that the ing shipment of fruit through quarantine barriers infestations in guava might reach 395 larvae/kg into areas where the Caribbean fruit fly does not of fruit. However, loquat, Surinam cherry, and occur. sapodilla (Achras zapota L.) also supported in festations in excess of 100 larvae/kg of fruit, and The most recent infestation of the Caribbean significant populations of larvae were found in fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew), in Florida calamondin, Barbados cherry, Governor's Plum appears to have begun in April 1965. Since that (Flacourtia indica (Burm. f. Merr.), spondias time, the fly has spread as far north as Jackson (Spondias sp.), and kumquats. For these studies ville and up the west coast of Florida to Tampa. (5), fiberglass holding boxes were used for fruit There is still no indication that the present infesta and the larvae emerged and dropped into a layer tion will disappear as the first one did (it was de of sand on the bottom of the box. By this method tected in 1931 and disappeared in 1936). Indeed, they found that minor hosts on the island of Key such an outcome seems less likely than before. In West included egg fruit (Pouteria compechiana 1972, Swanson and Baranowski (4) reported that (H.B.K.) Baehni), peach, cocoplum (Chryso- 84 species of fruits in 23 famiiles were hosts of balanus icaco L.), satin leaf (Chrysophyllum the fly. In 1966, Weems (6) reported only 34 host oliviforme Lam.), lime (Citrus aurantifolia species and found that the Caribbean fruit fly was Swingle), mango, seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera), not a serious pest of commercial citrus, mangos date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.), and sugar (Mangifera indica L.) or avocados (Persea amer- apple (Annona squamosa L.). An additional 17 icana Mill.) in Florida, though it did heavily infest species of fruit that were examined for fruit fly guavas (Psidium guajava L.), calamondin (Citrus larvae were negative. BURDITT, ET AL: INDUCED CARIBFLY INFESTATION 387 Research to develop commodity treatments such pared with 1.2 to 1.5% and 9.2 to 10.0%, respec as fumigation (2) for fruit infested with fruit tively, in uninfested fruit. flies requires that the investigator have available Similarly, in March and June, fruit obtained large numbers of fruit with moderate to heavy in from local cooperators were cage infested. The festation of larvae. However, in Florida, com mature Isle of Pine grapefruit supported an av mercial plantings of citrus, mangos, avocados and erage infestation of 3.4 larvae per kg. fruit in other fruit are generally not subject to heavy in March compared with 0.0 for similar fruit in Feb festations by the Caribbean fruit fly. Usually, ruary. Green fruit of this variety that had been when citrus were natural hosts the fruit was on injected did not support an infestation in June. backyard trees and had been left until they were Beginning in late June 1974, other grapefruit over-ripe (4). Even so, the incidence of larval were made available from fruit shippers in Ft. survival was low. Pierce, Vero Beach, and Tampa through the co operation of the Florida Fresh Citrus Fruit Ship Methods pers Association and their membership. These fruit and some locally grown grapefruit were either In our research therefore, the natural infesta cage infested or infested by injection. The results tion of larvae is being supplemented by using two (Table 1) showed levels ranging to an average of techniques, cage infestation or injection of eggs. 57 larvae per kg fruit for cage infested fruit com For cage infestation of fruit, the fruit are placed pared with 11 larvae per kg fruit for the naturally in a 12 x 12 x 9 feet high outdoor cage containing infested fruit. In this series of tests, varieties populations of adult fruit flies in excess of 30,000 showed considerable variation in susceptibility for 3-5 days. Generally one species of fruit is (Table 1). placed in the cage at a time though several va Finally, in early June 1974, we first placed rieties have frequently been infested at the same fruit from 28 mango seedlings and 7 cultivars time. For injection of eggs, eggs collected from (generally 25 from each tree) in our infestation oviposition cages are washed in water and sodium cage and held them for observation. (Four of these benzoate. Then, when the eggs are about 24 hours seedlings and a cultivar, Florigon, were derived old, ca. 200 are injected into each fruit by using a from an open pollinated Cambodiana tree.) The hypodermic syringe and needle. Infested fruit are infestation achieved by the exposure ranged from held in fiberglass containers at room temperature 8.9 to 132.3 larvae/kg fruit (Table 2). In another until the eggs hatch and larvae develop (5). test of fruit from seedlings of 13269, N 2187, and Larvae and pupae of the fruit fly are removed M 1007, (F-2 seedlings from Cambodiana) the in weekly from the containers and held in sand for festations averaged 7.2/kg; ranged from 0.4 to adult emergence. Simultaneous tests of total 163.9; and ranged from 0.0 to 13.5 respectively. In titratable acidity (expressed as citric acid) and of addition, fruit of 3 cultivars derived from Mulgoba soluble solids (expressed as sucrose) in a repre and 3 from other sources were cage infested. The sentative sample of infested fruit are analyzed by resultant infestations ranged from 5.9 to 64.9 standard methods (3). (Table 3). Results Discussion Early in February 1974, we obtained 159 fruit representing 5 varieties of grapefruit from the Investigations have demonstrated that the USDA Horticulture Research Laboratory in Or Caribbean fruit fly has a wide potential range of lando. These fruit, 39 locally grown Isle of Pine hosts. Research is needed to determine the factors variety grapefruit, and 4 over-ripe grapefruit of involved in the susceptibility of fruit to egg de mixed sources were placed in the infestation cage. position, hatch and survival of the larvae. Such The results (Table 1) showed that only 6 Carib factors as terpene content (of mangos), maturity, bean fruit fly larvae survived in and pupated from acidity, peel thickness, all could have an influence. 236 fruit; 11 were obtained from the 4 over-ripe All of the mango seedlings examined, the re fruit. The 6 larvae that did survive came from sult of an open pollination, are highly heterogene fruit with both thick (14.3 mm) and thin rind ous in origin. Three parents (13269, N2187 and (5.3 mm). The analysis of the test fruit showed M1007) were selected because of outstanding horti citric acid ranging from 0.6 to 1.4% and sucrose cultural performance. Although all 3 derive orig ranging from 9.8 to 11.0% in infested fruit com inally from P.I. 11645, 'Cambodiana', all show 388 FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1974 Table 1, Infestation of Caribbean fruit fly larvae in fruit. Fruit Infestation Data Time of No/kg. vear Kind Variety Number Technique fruit February Grapefruit Duncan 37 cage 0.0 Temple x Nakon x Duncan 38 cage 0.3 Pink seedless 44 cage 0.0 Isle of Pines Rough 35 cage 0.0 Normal 4 cage 0.4 Marsh 40 cage 0.1 Mixed over ripe 4 cage 6.9 March Grapefruit Isle of Pines 32 cage 3.4 Guava Common 60 cage 67.0 Orange Temple 25 cage 2.5 Murcott 25 cage 21.0 June Grapefruit Ruby red 24 cage 41.2 Isle of Pines 12 injected 0.0 Marsh 102 cage 57.4 Lime Persian 18 injected 2.3 Guava Common 40 injected 113.0 Common 20 natural 28.8 Grapefruit Pink seedless 34 natural 0.1 Marsh 23 natural 10.6 Marsh 13 injected 8.8 Marsh 13 injected 13.3 July Grapefruit Ruby red 86 injected 3.8 Marsh 125 injected 2.4 Marsh 242 injected 0.5 signs of a mixed background and two (M1007 and 10 of the 19 seedlings of N2187.
Recommended publications
  • Some Interesting Fruits from Tropical Asia
    FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 157 SOME INTERESTING FRUITS FROM TROPICAL ASIA WILSON POPENOE United Fruit Company, Guatemala City, Guat. When Dr. Wolfe invited me to present this couragements were so numerous and so defi brief paper before the Krome Memorial In nite that I decided we were too far north; stitute, I grasped the opportunity with par and I moved to Honduras, where, in a lovely ticular pleasure, primarily because it gives little valley three miles from the beach at me a chance to pay tribute to the memory Tela, we started planting mangosteens in of William J. Krome. It was my good for 1925. To give due credit, I should mention tune to see him frequently, back in the early that R. H. Goodell had already planted two days when he was developing an orchard at or three which he had obtained from Dr. Homestead. I felt the impulse of his dynam Fairchild at Washington, and they were pros ic enthusiasm, and I believe I appreciated pering. what he was doing for south Florida and for We obtained seed from Jamaica and from subtropical horticulture. In short, my admi Indo-China, and finally contracted for the ration for him and for his work knew no entire crop produced by an old tree on Lake bounds. Izabal in nearby Guatemala. We had no Yet many results might have been lost had trouble in starting the seedlings, and a year not Mrs. Krome carried on so ably and so or two later we began planting them out in devotedly with the work.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Van Dyke' Mango
    7. MofTet, M. L. 1973. Bacterial spot of stone fruit in Queensland. 12. Sherman, W. B., C. E. Yonce, W. R. Okie, and T. G. Beckman. Australian J. Biol. Sci. 26:171-179. 1989. Paradoxes surrounding our understanding of plum leaf scald. 8. Sherman, W. B. and P. M. Lyrene. 1985. Progress in low-chill plum Fruit Var. J. 43:147-151. breeding. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 98:164-165. 13. Topp, B. L. and W. B. Sherman. 1989. Location influences on fruit 9. Sherman, W. B. and J. Rodriquez-Alcazar. 1987. Breeding of low- traits of low-chill peaches in Australia. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. chill peach and nectarine for mild winters. HortScience 22:1233- 102:195-199. 1236. 14. Topp, B. L. and W. B. Sherman. 1989. The relationship between 10. Sherman, W. B. and R. H. Sharpe. 1970. Breeding plums in Florida. temperature and bloom-to-ripening period in low-chill peach. Fruit Fruit Var. Hort. Dig. 24:3-4. Var.J. 43:155-158. 11. Sherman, W. B. and B. L. Topp. 1990. Peaches do it with chill units. Fruit South 10(3): 15-16. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 103:298-299. 1990. THE 'VAN DYKE' MANGO Carl W. Campbell History University of Florida, I FAS Tropical Research and Education Center The earliest records we were able to find on the 'Van Homestead, FL 33031 Dyke' mango were in the files of the Variety Committee of the Florida Mango Forum. They contain the original de scription form, quality evaluations dated June and July, Craig A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruby' Mango
    bands could also interfere with the differentiation of Literature Cited meristematic tissues in the formation of graft unions. Almeyda, N. 1976. El mamey zapote. Instituto Mayaguezano de Agricul- An additional factor reported by Ogden (1984), which tura Tropical, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. may cause problems in grafting, was the high content of Almeyda, N. and F. W. Martin. 1976. Cultivation of neglected tropical silica in the cortical tissue of mamey sapote stems. She fruits with promise. Part 2. The mamey sapote. U.S. Dept. Agr. ARS- found this to be a physical problem in the preparation of S-156. stem sections for microscopic examination, the tissues Balerdi, C. 1991. More choice: an update on mamey sapote cultivars in Florida. Trop. Fruit World 2(1): 18-19. tending to tear rather than to cut cleanly because of the Campbell, C. W. 1967. The mamey sapote in southern Florida. Proc. Fla. hardness of the silica deposits. The silica caused microtome State Hort. Soc. 80:318-320. blades to become dull quickly and would have the same Campbell, C. W. and S. P. Lara. 1982. Mamey sapote cultivars in Florida. effect on the blades of grafting knives. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 95:114-115. Cockshutt, N. 1991. Pantin's mamey. Trop. Fruit World 2(1): 12-17. Nevertheless, although all of these factors contribute to Gonzales, L. G. and R. L. Favella. 1952. Inter-generic graft affinity of the the difficulty of grafting the mamey sapote, with proper chico. Philip. Agr. 35:402-409. techniques and good environmental conditions, this fruit Lazo Rodriguez, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership and Ethical Development: Balancing Light and Shadow
    LEADERSHIP AND ETHICAL DEVELOPMENT: BALANCING LIGHT AND SHADOW Benyamin M. Lichtenstein, Beverly A. Smith, and William R. Torbert A&stract: What makes a leader ethical? This paper critically examines the answer given by developmental theory, which argues that individuals can develop throu^ cumulative stages of ethical orientation and behavior (e.g. Hobbesian, Kantian, Rawlsian), such that leaders at later develop- mental stages (of whom there are empirically very few today) are more ethical. By contrast to a simple progressive model of ethical develop- ment, this paper shows that each developmental stage has both positive (light) and negative (shadow) aspects, which affect the ethical behaviors of leaders at that stage It also explores an unexpected result: later stage leaders can have more significantly negative effects than earlier stage leadership. Introduction hat makes a leader ethical? One answer to this question can be found in Wconstructive-developmental theory, which argues that individuals de- velop through cumulative stages that can be distinguished in terms of their epistemological assumptions, in terms of the behavior associated with each "worldview," and in terms of the ethical orientation of a person at that stage (Alexander et.al., 1990; Kegan, 1982; Kohlberg, 1981; Souvaine, Lahey & Kegan, 1990). Developmental theory has been successfully applied to organiza- tional settings and has illuminated the evolution of managers (Fisher, Merron & Torbert, 1987), leaders (Torbert 1989, 1994b; Fisher & Torbert, 1992), and or- ganizations (Greiner, 1972; Quinn & Cameron, 1983; Torbert, 1987a). Further, Torbert (1991) has shown that successive stages of personal development have an ethical logic that closely parallels the socio-historical development of ethical philosophies during the modern era; that is, each sequential ethical theory from Hobbes to Rousseau to Kant to Rawls explicitly outlines a coherent worldview held implicitly by persons at successively later developmental stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Allergen and Special Diet
    ALLERGEN AND SPECIAL DIET PEANUTS TREE NUTS SOY MILK EGG WHEAT KOSHER GLUTEN VEGAN EXCLUDES COCONUT FREE BASES DAIRY Organic Signature Premium NON-DAIRY Cashew Coconut Mango Sorbet Nitrodole™ (Pineapple Sorbet) Piña Colada Sorbet Strawberry Sorbet FLAVORS Banana Birthday Cake Cap’n Crunch® Cheesecake Chocolate Cookie Butter Cookie Monster Cookies & Cream (Oreo®) Frosted Animal Cookie Fruity Pebbles® Madagascar Vanilla Bean Matcha Green Tea Milk Coffee Mint Nutella® Reese’s Peanut Butter® Ruby Cacao (Signature Premium Base Only) Sea Salt Caramel Strawberry Thai Tea TOPPINGS CANDIES Heath® Mini Chocolate Chips Mini Gummy Bears Mini Marshmallows Mochi Rainbow Sprinkles Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups® Unicorn Dust CEREALS, COOKIES & CAKES Biscoff® Cookies Brownie Bites Cap’n Crunch® Cheesecake Bites Chips Ahoy® Cookies Cookie Dough Bites Frosted Animal Cookies Fruity Pebbles® Graham Crackers Melba Toast Oreo® Cookies *Products may contain traces of allergens (peanuts, tree nuts, soy, milk, eggs or wheat) or other food sensitivities from a manufacturing facility or cross contact DISCLAIMER Your health is of the utmost importance and we strive to minimize the potential risk of cross contact by maintaining high standards of food safety practices. Vegan, non-dairy, and customers with other health and/or diet restrictions should review this document and the special diet and ingredient information available on our website. Due to menu constant menu changes, please be aware the information provided may not 100% reflect products served in store. Last updated 062019 If you have further questions regarding the nutritional information, please contact us at [email protected]. *Percent daily Values (DV) are based on a 2,000 calorie diet.
    [Show full text]
  • JULY 2016 Our Next Meeting Is Monday, July 18Th at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway Which Is the Golden Gate Community Center
    COLLIER FRUIT GROWERS NEWSLETTER JULY 2016 Our next meeting is Monday, July 18th at 4701 Golden Gate Parkway which is the Golden Gate Community Center. The topic is going to be " Unusual and Rare Fruit Trees that Adapt or May Adapt to Cultivation in Florida". There will not be an August meeting. See you in September Our speaker is Berto Silva, a native Brazilian who specializes in growing rare and unusual fruits. Berto was raised in northeast Brazil where he learned to enjoy several different types of fruits. In the last twenty years, he has experimented growing rare and unusual fruits from all over the world including some varieties native to the Amazon region. He has a spectacular jaboticaba arbor at his home in South Ft. Myers. He is an active member with the Bonita Springs Tropical Fruit Club and with the Caloosa Rare Fruit Exchange. Berto’s collection includes myrciarias, eugenias, pouterias, annonas, mangiferas, and campomanesias. The meeting starts at 7:30 pm at the Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway in Golden Gate City. The tasting table opens at 7:00 pm. BURDS’ NEST OF INFORMATION THIS and THAT FOR JULY MANGOS MANGOS MANGOS We suggest that you attend: The International Mango Festival is at Fairchild Tropical Botanical Garden on July 9 th &10 th from 9am -4pm. Saturday is the better day to go. The University of Florida Collier County Extension on Saturday July 16 th from 9am – 1pm presents “Alternatives to Citrus - Mango and Fruit Trees for you yard” with Steve from Fruit Scapes & the Burds.
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Fruit Growers Newsletter May 2015
    COLLIER FRUIT GROWERS NEWSLETTER MAY 2015 The May 18th Speaker is Dr. Doug “Dougbug” Caldwell . Doug Caldwell will present and discuss his concept of a Collier Fruit Initiative as well as current invasive pests of Southwest Florida. DougBug is the go-to person on insects in Collier County and has a heart to promote fruit trees comfortable with our unique climate. DougBug is the commercial horticulturalist, entomologist and certified arborist at the UF/IFAS Collier County extension office. Next Meeting is May 18 at the Golden Gate Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway 7:00 pm for the tasting table and 7:30 pm for the meeting/program. BURDS’ NEST OF INFORMATION THIS and THAT FOR MAY: MANGOS: Now that the mango season is commencing, LATE mangos should be selectively pruned, (yes - there will be fruit on the tree) so as to have fruit again next year. Selectively pruning, so as not to lose all the fruit. If late mangos are pruned after the fruit is harvested, eg: late September or October, it raises the % chance of no fruit the next year. Late mangos are Keitt, Neelum, Palmer, Beverly, Wise, Cryder & Zillate Early mangos – Rosigold, Lemon Saigon, Glen, Manilita & Florigon, to name just a few! When the fruit has been harvested, fertilize with 0-0-18. This is recommended because of the minors in the formulae. Fertilizing with nitrogen will cause ‘jelly seed’ and poor quality fruit. Also, spray with micro nutrients just before the new growth has hardened off. Page 2 COLLIER FRUIT GROWERS NEWSLETTER RECIPE OF THE MONTH Meyer lemons are believed to be a natural hybrid of a lemon and a sweet orange.
    [Show full text]
  • DURING FROZEN STORAGE by ANGELA RINCON
    EFFECT OF PREFREEZING TREATMENTS ON QUALITY OF MANGO (Manguifera Indica L.) DURING FROZEN STORAGE by ANGELA RINCON (Under the direction of William L. Kerr) ABSTRACT At the moment there is a high demand for high-quality fruit ingredients to be used in many food formulations such as pastry and confectionery products, ice cream, frozen desserts and sweets, fruit salads, cheese and yoghurt. The overall objective was to improve quality of frozen mango using two types of food cryoprotection: one was the reduction of water content of the fruit (osmotic dehydration) and the other was the formulation of mango pulp with carbohydrates of different molecular weight to increase frozen stability. Osmotic dehydration was able to modify quality parameters of slices before and after frozen storage. Values for some parameters such as vitamin C, lightness (L*), chroma (C*), and firmness for non osmotically dehydrated slices were significantly higher than osmotically dehydrated slices. However, treatments carried out with osmotic solutions (especially those with high concentrations of sucrose) improved significantly the quality of mango slices after frozen storage. Higher moisture losses and solid gain values were reported for slices from the highest osmotic solution concentration. Thus, slices dipped in 30oBrix were better protected against freezing damage. Effects of sucrose concentration on the slices and ripening stage on frozen-thawed mango flavor perception were determined. Six flavor descriptors (color, flavor, sweetness, sourness, firmness and juiciness) were evaluated by a sensory trained panel. All descriptors were affected by sugar content and ripening stage. To study the effect of mango fruit composition on frozen stability, five pulp samples were prepared and evaluated in terms of glass transition temperature modification and its influence on ascorbic acid retention.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory, Bruce
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project BRUCE GREGORY Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: January 5, 2006 Copyright 2015 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Rhode Island Barrington College, American University USIA’s Historical Office 1967-1970 Research on USIA’s pre-WWII origins Monograph on US international broadcasting USIA 1970-1978 Book programs Speaker programs Young Officers Policy Panel AFGE Local 1812 Thomas Legal Defense Fund Foreign Affairs Specialist lawsuit, AFGE v. Keogh Selection out due process lawsuit, Lindsey v. Kissinger E.O. 11636, FS employee-management system Foreign Service representation election in USIA Collective bargaining in USIA Dante Fascell, hearings on Stanton Panel report Congressional Fellowship, Mo Udall, Carl Levin 1978-1979 Udall re-election campaign Panama Canal Treaty implementing legislation Detail to USIS New Delhi US Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy 1980-1998 Carter administration, Olin Robison US International Communication Agency Reagan administration, Edwin J. Feulner Annual reports Reports on summit diplomacy, Soviet Union, China Report on public diplomacy and terrorism 1 USIA Director Charles Z. Wick Peter Galbraith’s interest in the Commission George H. W. Bush administration, Tom Korologos Commission opposition to TV Marti Views on US broadcasting after the Cold War Commission opposition to Radio Free Asia Clinton administration, Lewis Manilow, Harold Pachios Senator Jesse Helms and foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Living Plants - 20 August 2006 Page 1 of 380
    Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Living Plants - 20 August 2006 Page 1 of 380 ACCESSION FAMILY NAME COMMON NAME PLOT 2004-0964*A ACANTHACEAE Anisacanthus quadrifidus var. wrightii 'Pumpkin' 45 2004-0963*A ACANTHACEAE Anisacanthus quadrifidus var. wrightii 'Select Red' 44 86207*B ACANTHACEAE Aphelandra aff. jacobinoides 132 86207*F ACANTHACEAE Aphelandra aff. jacobinoides 133 82605*B ACANTHACEAE Aphelandra sinclairiana 128D 2003-1553*A ACANTHACEAE Aphelandra sp. 133 95407*C ACANTHACEAE Aphelandra sp. 32A 95407*D ACANTHACEAE Aphelandra sp. 32A 95555*A ACANTHACEAE Aphelandra sp. 29 2005-1630*A ACANTHACEAE Barleria repens var. rosea 49 2004-0386*A ACANTHACEAE Bravaisia berlandieriana 50 2004-0386*B ACANTHACEAE Bravaisia berlandieriana 50 2004-0386*C ACANTHACEAE Bravaisia berlandieriana 50 2004-0386*D ACANTHACEAE Bravaisia berlandieriana 50 82506*A ACANTHACEAE Bravaisia integerrima Jiggerwood 169 82506*B ACANTHACEAE Bravaisia integerrima Jiggerwood 169 2000446*A ACANTHACEAE Brillantaisia nitens 152 2001-0828*B ACANTHACEAE Brillantaisia nitens 131 2001-0828*C ACANTHACEAE Brillantaisia nitens 131 2001-0828*F ACANTHACEAE Brillantaisia nitens 132 2005-0397*A ACANTHACEAE Crossandra infundibuliformis 44 2005-1241*A ACANTHACEAE Crossandra infundibuliformis 29 2002-0095*A ACANTHACEAE Crossandra infundibuliformis 'Florida Summer' 123A 2002-0095*B ACANTHACEAE Crossandra infundibuliformis 'Florida Summer' 123A 2003-1130*A ACANTHACEAE Dyschoriste angusta Pineland twinflower 12 2005-1277*A ACANTHACEAE Eranthemum nigrum 43 2006-0081*A ACANTHACEAE Eranthemum nigrum 130 2006-0081*B ACANTHACEAE Eranthemum nigrum 130 982372*A ACANTHACEAE Eranthemum nigrum 43 X.11-47*A ACANTHACEAE Eranthemum pulchellum blue sage 4 81145*A ACANTHACEAE Fittonia gigantea RPH www.fairchildgarden.org Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Living Plants - 20 August 2006 Page 2 of 380 ACCESSION FAMILY NAME COMMON NAME PLOT 2002-0568*B ACANTHACEAE Fittonia sp.
    [Show full text]
  • ECHO's Catalogue and Compendium of Warm Climate Fruits
    ECHO's Catalogue and Compendium of Warm Climate Fruits Featuring both common and hard-to-find fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices and bamboo for Southwest Florida ECHO's Catalogue and Compendium of Warm Climate Fruits Featuring both common and hard-to-find fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices and bamboo for Southwest Florida D. Blank, A. Boss, R. Cohen and T. Watkins, Editors Contributing Authors: Dr. Martin Price, Daniel P. Blank, Cory Thede, Peggy Boshart, Hiedi Hans Peterson Artwork by Christi Sobel This catalogue and compendium are the result of the cumulative experi- ence and knowledge of dedicated ECHO staff members, interns and vol- unteers. Contained in this document, in a practical and straight-forward style, are the insights, observations, and recommendations from ECHO’s 25 year history as an authority on tropical and subtropical fruit in South- west Florida. Our desire is that this document will inspire greater enthusi- asm and appreciation for growing and enjoying the wonderful diversity of warm climate fruits. We hope you enjoy this new edition of our catalogue and wish you many successes with tropical fruits! Also available online at: www.echonet.org ECHO’s Tropical Fruit Nursery Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization 17391 Durrance Rd. North Fort Myers, FL 33917 (239) 567-1900 FAX (239) 543-5317 Email: [email protected] This material is copyrighted 1992. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited. Revised May 1996, Sept 1998, May 2002 and March 2007. Fruiting Trees, Shrubs and Herbaceous Plants Table of Contents 1. Fruiting Trees, Shrubs and Herbaceous Plants 2 2. Trees for the Enthusiast 34 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonita Springs Tropical Fruit Club 2017 Tree Sale Pre-Order Form
    BONITA SPRINGS TROPICAL FRUIT CLUB 2017 TREE SALE PRE-ORDER FORM Customer Name:____________________________________________________________________________________ Phone:_______________________ (OK to Text this number? Y/N) Email:____________________________________ NOTE: Tree Sale is Saturday, Feb. 25 at Riverside Park in Bonita Springs, from 9-1:00. Pre-orders must be picked up and paid for by noon that day or they may be sold. Submit pre-orders by Sunday, Feb. 12 to Kathy at [email protected] or 239-822-7151. You will receive order confirmation. Tree availability may change due to factors beyond our control. TREE* 1 gallon 3 gallon 7 gallon* Your Notes or Variety Selection (see back), if applicable TOTAL COST All Citrus $15 $30 $50 Atemoya $65 Avocado $35 $60 Banana $25 $40 Barbados Cherry $30 $50 Black Sapote $35 $60 Blackberry $25 Canistel $35 $60 Carambola $35 $60 Coconut $35 $60 Dragon Fruit $15 $35 Fig $35 $60 Guanabana See Soursop Grumichama $35 $60 Jaboticaba $35 $60 Jackfruit $35 $60 Jujube $35 $60 Longan $35 $60 Loquat $35 $60 Lychee $35 $60 Macadamia $35 $65 Mamey Sapote $40 $75 Mango $40 $65 Miracle Fruit $20 $40 Mulberry $35 $60 Circle: regular / dwarf Papaya $20 Passion Fruit $25 Peach or Plum $35 $60 Indicate which: Persimmon $35 $60 Pineapple $10 Raspberry $25 Sapodilla $40 $75 Soursop $35 $65 Sugar Apple $35 $65 Fruitilizer 50 lbs. $25 Fruitscapes’ special fertilizer blend for growing fruit. Perlite, large bag $20 A must-have for successful container growing. Book: Florida’s Best Fruiting Plants $22 The bible of tropical fruit for home growers in Florida.
    [Show full text]