DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to Submissions Tarkine Forest Drive Tasmania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to Submissions Tarkine Forest Drive Tasmania Response to Submissions Tarkine Forest Drive Tasmania Reference: EPBC 2011/6210 Table of Contents 1. Purpose .................................................................................................. 1 2. Background .............................................................................................. 1 3. Submissions Received ................................................................................. 2 3.1 Submission 1 ..................................................................................... 2 3.2 Submission 2 ..................................................................................... 4 3.3 Submission 3 ................................................................................... 10 3.4 Submission 4 ................................................................................... 20 3.5 Submission 5 - The Tarkine National Coalition........................................... 22 3.6 Other non-formal submission ............................................................... 35 4. References ............................................................................................. 36 Appendix A Public submissions Prepared by: ____________________________ Date: 19 December 2012 Dion Lester Reviewed by: ____________________________ Date: 19 December 2012 Ian Woodward Authorised by: ___________________________ Date: 19 December 2012 Dion Lester Report Revision History Rev Description Prepared by Reviewed by Authorised by Date No. 00 Response to Submissions Dion Lester Ian Woodward Dion Lester 13/12/2012 Tarkine Forest Drive Tasmania – Reference: EPBC 2011/6210 Ref: HB09080H002 Response to submissions 33P Rev 01/DL/jw 1. Purpose This Response to Submissions has been prepared by the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (DIER), following the public advertising of DIERs Draft Public Environment Report (Draft PER) for the proposed Tarkine Forest Drive in Tasmania’s north west. The Response has been prepared to assist the Commonwealth’s environmental assessment of the road upgrade under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the Act). Following the advertising of the Draft PER for public comment, section 99 of the Act requires that DIER finalises the PER (incorporating any required amendments) and prepares this companion Response to Submissions which is to include at least a summary of public comments and how they have been addressed. The Act requires that DIER provides the final PER to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water Population and Communities (SEWPaC), along with this Response and copies of any comments after finalising the PER. The Act requires that DIER then publish the finalised PER and this Response within 10 business days of providing them to the Department. Subject to any requests from the Minister for further information, a decision on whether the proposed action will be approved will be due within 40 business days of the Department receiving that documentation. 2. Background On 18 November 2011 a referral for the Tarkine Forest Drive Project was submitted to SEWPaC. The Minister determined that the proposal was a controlled action (EPBC 2011/6210) and that the level of assessment was to be a Public Environment Report (PER) on 3 January 2012 The Minister issued final guidelines for the PER in March 2012. A Draft PER was prepared by DIER in accordance with the PER guidelines. The Draft PER describes the proposal, examines the potential environmental impacts and describes how those impacts will be avoided, mitigated and/or managed. In accordance with section 98(1)(c) of the Act, the Draft PER was made available by DIER for public review and comment. Its availability was advertised in The Australian, The Advocate and The Mercury newspapers. The public review was open from 15 October 2012 until 12 November 2012. The Draft PER was made available for viewing and downloading from the DIER web site (http://www.transport.tas.gov.au/infrastructure_projects/public_displays/tarkine_pu blic_environment_report). Copies of the Draft PER were also made available for viewing at: Circular Head Council offices, 33 Goldie St, Smithton The Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources, 10 Murray St, Hobart Smithton Library, Nelson St, Smithton Service Tasmania, 134 Macquarie St, Hobart Cradle Coast Authority, 30 Marine Terrace, Burnie Ref: HB09080H002 Response to submissions 33P Rev 01/DL/jw 1 The Library of the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, John Gorton Building, King Edward Terrace, Parkes, Canberra. 3. Submissions Received Five public submission on the Draft PER were received. For privacy reasons the names and addresses of each submission author has been omitted. The only exception to this is the organisation - the Tarkine National Coalition. It was deemed necessary to highlighted this submission given the background and also the TNC are on the public record a number of times for this project. This Response to Submissions provides responses to the issues raised in these submissions and describes the revisions made to the PER. The submission comments requiring a response are provided below in blue italic font, with a response directly following the specific points raised. A statement as to the changes required to the Draft PER completes each response. A full copy of each submission can be found in Appendix A. 3.1 Submission 1 We, the undersigned, hereby lodge this written objection to the proposed project and provide in support the following most important reasons for objecting most vigorously. 1. We are totally convinced that the purpose behind these road improvements is to allow access for commercial activities, other than tourism. We are advised that under all the current Laws, irrespective of any World Heritage Listing, the state Government can still carry out forest logging and mining activities. For this reason alone, until these Laws are amended, this proposed heavy duty ‘all purpose’ road will be forever, at the risk of being used to exploit and ruin forever this vast natural wilderness area. Why not just leave the good existing ‘very useable’ roads and only upgrade any needed repairs to reach the same standard and repair or replace any bridges to the same ‘moderate’ standard? Thereby saving the State Government millions of taxpayer’s funds and allows the tourists to see the Tarkine Wilderness as it now is and how it should remain. The existing road not only slows traffic for visitors to view the beauty of the area but also protects the wildlife and must remain, as the last real Tasmanian natural wonder. The Tarkine Forest Drive was conceived as a tourist road (please refer to sections 1.6 & 1.7 of the PER) and directly corresponds with one of the five corridors identified in the Tarkine Tourism Development Strategy, developed in 2008 by the Tarkine Discussion Group. The Tarkine Discussion Group is a key regional representative stakeholder group, consisting of regional tourism bodies, Tourism Tasmania, local government leaders, public land managers and special interest groups, including the Tarkine National Coalition and the Arthur Pieman Conservation Management Committee. The group has been extensively consulted (and continues to be) in the development and planning for the Tarkine Forest Drive. There is considerable uncertainty over the future of Forestry in this region (as a result of the Tasmanian Forests Intergovernmental Agreement, refer to Figure 1.2 in the PER) and mining (as a result of the potential National Heritage Listing); however, the planning of the Tarkine Road has continued unabated. This is because the Tarkine Forest Road is a tourist road. Ref: HB09080H002 Response to submissions 33P Rev 01/DL/jw 2 The State-owned road network consists of 3,650 km of road. It is a subset of the broader road network that focuses on connectivity and movement functions at State and regional levels. To plan and manage this network within a clear and strategic framework, DIER has adopted a five-tier hierarchy. The hierarchy identifies five categories of roads: Category 1 Trunk Roads - The primary freight and passenger roads connecting Tasmania Category 2 Regional Freight Road - Tasmania’s major regional roads for carrying heavy freight Category 3 Regional Access Road - The main access roads to Tasmania’s Regions, carrying less heavy freight traffic than Regional Freight Roads Category 4 Feeder Road - Allowing safe travel between towns, major tourist destinations and industrial areas Category 5 Other Roads - The remainder of the State Roads. The Tarkine Forest Drive is a Category 5 Other Road. Other Roads are primarily access roads for private properties. Some may be used for comparatively low frequency heavy freight vehicle transport and for log transport but they are not the most important log transport roads, and experience fluctuation in use. The works proposed are the minimum necessary to facilitate safe tourist access – there is certainly no “heavy duty ‘all purpose’ road” proposed. In fact, the design width is 0.6 m narrower (shoulders are each 0.3 m narrower) than DIER’s target standards for a Category 5 road. The existing roads will be improved so that they can facilitate increased and improved tourist access to the area. Moreover, many tourists are denied access to this area as hire car companies do not allow vehicles to travel on gravel roads. DIER has recently assumed responsibility for all of the previously Forestry Tasmania roads that make up
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Explorer
    Travelling times and distances, based on safe speed and good road conditions Due to the remote and rugged Experience Tasmania’s Smithton – Marrawah: terrain of this region, some unique western wilderness roads are narrow and winding. 45 minutes / 49 km / 90 kmh / sealed The Western Explorer route links Stanley in the North West WESTERN Marrawah – Arthur River: Many of these roads are to Strahan on the West Coast and takes you through some 10 minutes / 12 km / 80 kmh / sealed unsealed and therefore of the State’s most beautiful and isolated areas. susceptible to the varying EXPLORER Road travellers can expect a unique experience, exploring Arthur River – Couta Rocks: weather conditions. 20 minutes / 18 km / 70 kmh / unsealed a region steeped in early mining history, surrounded by wilderness and remarkable scenery. The landscape is wild Couta Rocks – Blackwater Road: West Coast Wilderness Drive Smithton to Strahan and rugged with a climate that can vary from snow to 15 minutes / 16km / 70 kmh / unsealed brilliant sunshine in one day. Blackwater Road – Lindsay River: During wet weather, roads This guide provides you with valuable information about 20 minutes / 21 km / 70 kmh / unsealed can become slippery, flooded or potholed. Unsealed roads the road conditions between Stanley and Strahan, however Lindsay River – Corinna: can become extremely dusty be prepared: If you break down, the roads are isolated and 90 minutes / 57 km / 40 kmh / unsealed during dry periods. you may experience a long delay before another traveller or assistance comes. Arthur River – Corinna: For your safety and comfort 2 hrs 15 minutes. it is wise to check road and Arthur River – Zeehan: weather conditions before 3 hrs 15 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017/2018 Annual Report
    2017/2018 Annual Report Presented to the 66th Annual General Meeting 19th October 2018 Contents Board Members 2017/2018 .......................................... 4 Agenda 2018 AGM ......................................................... 5 Previous Minutes – 65th AGM 1st November 2017 ........ 6 Returning Officer’s Declaration ..................................... 7 President’s Report ......................................................... 8 Branch Reports ............................................................ 10 Southern Branch ........................................................ 10 Northern Branch ........................................................ 10 North West Branch .................................................... 11 National Report ........................................................... 12 Past Presidents ............................................................ 13 Management Excellence Awards Recipients ............... 14 Raymond West Scholarship Award Winners ............... 15 Member Register 2017/2018 ...................................... 16 Financial Report 2017/2018 ........................................ 20 Our Corporate Partners ............................................... 36 P a g e | 2 Our Vision Every person working in local government has the opportunity to achieve his/her fullest potential and career aspirations Our Mission To be the peak body for local government professionals in Tasmania providing excellence in management and effective representation for the local government profession.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarkine Coast Expedition 6 Days | 58 Km Walking the Remote and Wild Tarkine Coastline
    TARKINE COAST EXPEDITION 6 DAYS | 58 KM WALKING THE REMOTE AND WILD TARKINE COASTLINE There is something awe inspiring about a remote coastline at the edge of the earth. The rugged, windswept takayna / Tarkine coastline showcases the true beauty and power of a wilderness landscape. The Tarkine coastline is not only breathtaking, but the expansive ocean beaches, remote rivers and huge surf create a powerful backdrop for your Tarkine Coast Expedition walking adventure. It is a place of huge historical significance in Australia, with an Aboriginal history dating back thousands of years. Evidence of the Tarkiner people, after whom the takayna / Tarkine is named, still remain dotted all over the coastline with some of the largest middens ever found in Australia along our expedition. The Tarkine Coast Expedition is completed in full respect and acknowledgment of the Aboriginal people of Tasmania. All care is taken to ensure their relics and cultural histories are respected and maintained in the way that they wish. www.tarkinetrails.com.au [email protected] 1300 133 278 #tarkinetrails WHAT’S INCLUDED IMPORTANT NOTES • 2 professional wilderness guides. Your 6 Day Tarkine Coast Expedition is graded as a • 5 nights camping. challenging tour. We advise you to do as much training • 5 breakfasts, 6 lunches & 5 dinners. as you can before your tour. The more you train for the • Transport to and from Launceston. walk the easier you will handle the terrain and the more • Pieman River boat transfers. you will enjoy this wonderful part of the world. It’s also • Tent and sleeping mat.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Centre for Environmental Law
    Australian Centre for Environmental Law Best practice heritage identification and protection, Australia’s national heritage regime and the Tarkine Deb Wilkinson and Andrew Macintosh Australian Centre for Environmental Law ANU College of Law ACEL Working Paper March 2011 1. Introduction The Australian National Heritage List (NHL) was established in January 2004 to record, protect and conserve the natural, cultural and Indigenous heritage values associated with places of national significance. As originally envisaged, its role was to fill the gap in the heritage hierarchy between the world and state heritage regimes. The universal values of world heritage properties are listed and protected under the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conversation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). State and local government heritage laws provide for the recording, protection and conservation of places of state, regional and local importance. They also protect places of national significance but do so through the lens of state and local interests. The NHL was supposed to provide a single, comprehensive list of places of national significance, which fall between those of world and state importance, and ensure the values of those places are adequately protected and conserved. While there was a coherent logic behind the role of the NHL, its creation was controversial. Previously, the principal federal heritage legislation was the Australian Heritage Commission Act , which was created by the Whitlam Labor Government in 1975. This Act established the Australian Heritage Commission, an independent statutory authority that was responsible for the maintenance of the Register of the National Estate (RNE). The object of the RNE was to provide a comprehensive record of natural and cultural sites ‘that have aesthetic, historic, scientific or social significance or other special value for future generations as well as for the present community’.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 FEBRUARY 2016 No
    [307] VOL. CCCXXVI OVER THE COUNTER SALES $2.75 INCLUDING G.S.T. TASMANIAN GOV ERNMENT • U • B E AS RT LIT AS•ET•FIDE TASMANIA GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY 24 FEBRUARY 2016 No. 21 580 ISSN 0039-9795 CONTENTS Notices to Creditors Notice Page OWEN IVAN WILLIAM RAYNER late of 103 West Park Administration and Probate ..................................... 309 Grove Burnie in Tasmania business proprietor/city council employee widowed deceased: Creditors next of kin and others Crown Lands ............................................................ 311 having claims in respect of the property or Estate of the Forest Practices ........................................................ 312 deceased Owen Ivan William Rayner who died on the twentieth day of November 2015 are required by the Executor Tasmanian Heavy Vehicle National ..........................................` 310 Perpetual Trustees Limited of Level 2/137 Harrington Street Land Acquisition ...................................................... 309 Hobart in Tasmania to send particulars to the said Company by the twenty fourth day of March 2016 after which date the Living Marine Resources Management ................... 311 Executor may distribute the assets having regard only to the Local Government ................................................... 310 claims of which it then has notice. Mental Health ........................................................... 310 Dated this twenty fourth day of February 2016. Notices to Creditors ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Is Tasmania Nature
    THIS IS TASMANIA NATURE Dove Lake, Cradle Mountain NATURE It makes natural sense. After InternatioNAl all, this is a treasure island of TREASURES 4 World Heritage Area sites with ADVENTURE ISlAND 6 national parks encompassing DEVIlS oF A TIME 8 an astounding one fifth of ABoVE AND BEYoND 10 Tasmania’s total area. To top WATERWAYS, WIlDERNESS, that there’s more than 1,000 WIlDlIFE 12 mountains to explore, including WAlKS oN THE WIlDSIDE 14 one right in the backyard of go WITH THE FloW 16 the biggest city. What better THE PERFECT CAST 18 environment, then, for a range ITINERARIES & MAP 20 of mild to wild adventures from wilderness walks to wildlife- spotting, dam abseiling to river cruising. Bishop & Clerk, Maria Island 4 NATURE NATIoNAl PARKS 5 Lake Dove, Cradle Mountain Russell Falls, Mt Field National Park INTERNATIoNAl TREASURES World Heritage Area (WHA) sites around the world that encompass 1.38 million hectares, or a staggering 20 diversity of habitats and ecosystems for plants and animals Field National Park, close to Hobart is one of the island’s tend to meet only a few of the 10 criteria required for per cent of the island. While much of this is superbly wild that are found nowhere else on earth. The Douglas- most popular parks and a dreamworld of waterfalls and their prestigious UNESCO listing. But only two locations and tantalisingly remote, parts of it are easy to discover. Apsley National Park, near Bicheno on Tasmania’s east mountain scenery. The South Bruny National Park meet seven of them – one is in China and the other is Effortless access points include Cradle Mountain and coast, features the Lookout Track Circuit, which takes just boasts a striking beach which runs to an elevated cape in, yes, Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarkine Tasmania 27 January–6 February 2015
    Tarkine Tasmania 27 January–6 February 2015 Bush Blitz Species Discovery Program Tarkine, Tasmania 27 January–6 February 2015 What is Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a multi-million dollar partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Australia to document plants and animals in selected properties across Australia. This innovative partnership harnesses the expertise of many of Australia’s top scientists from museums, herbaria, universities, and other institutions and organisations across the country. Abbreviations ABRS Australian Biological Resources Study ANIC Australian National Insect Collection CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (Tasmania) EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) QM Queensland Museum TMAG Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery TSP Act Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (Tasmania) UNSW University of New South Wales Page 2 of 32 Tarkine, Tasmania 27 January–6 February 2015 Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in various reserves in the Tarkine region in north-western Tasmania between 27 January and 6 February 2015. The Tarkine region can be defined roughly as the area bounded by the Southern Ocean to the west, the Arthur River to the north, the Pieman River to the south, and the Murchison Highway to the east. Reserves in the region that were surveyed included: Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area, Donaldson River Nature Recreation Area, Meredith Range Regional Reserve, Pieman River State Reserve, Savage River National Park, Savage River Pipeline Regional Reserve, and Savage River Regional Reserve. The Bush Blitz also extended slightly to the south of this area, with some surveys conducted in Mount Dundas Regional Reserve and Mount Heemskirk Regional Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Inundation Define the Areas of Concern
    Coastal inundation Define the areas of concern Definition: Coastal inundation the temporary and permanent flooding of a portion of land within the coastal zone. – Temporary inundation is a storm tide event that considers the following factors; • regional storm surge and tides, • climate change (including sea level rise allowance and changing likelihood of storm events), • local storm surge ,wave setup, wave runup - not modelled . – Permanent inundation is the permanent loss of land to the sea, it considers the following factors: • National Tide Centre high water mark (tides), • climate change sea level rise planning allowance. – Tsunami events are considered as part of the emergency management controls. Department of Premier and Cabinet 2 Definition: Annual Exceedance Probability Department of Premier and Cabinet 3 Coastal inundation - inputs State wide 25m DEM (DPIPWE) LiDAR mapping NTC mean high tide (CFT) (NTC) State sea level rise Coastal allowance vulnerability assessment (Stage1 (DPAC - TCCO) -TPC) Coastal inundation Extreme tides and Storm studies by local sea level events government ACE CRC (CFT) (Clarence City tide Council) Department of Premier and Cabinet Coastal inundation - inputs LiDAR mapping (CFT) State sea level rise State wide 25m allowance DEM (TCCO) (DPIPWE) Coastal inundation NTC mean high Permanent studies by local tide government (NTC / ACE-CRC) inundation (Clarence City Council) Department of Premier and Cabinet 6 Assumptions used in the non LiDAR areas • When mapping the projected flood levels the figure has been
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of the Tarkine Region, North-West Tasmania
    Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 A survey of the freshwater fish fauna of the Tarkine region, north-west Tasmania 27 January – 6 February 2015 Submitted: 26 March 2015 Scott Hardie Page 1 of 29 Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Collection methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 General methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 8 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage Listing of the Tarkine Area
    Potential Socio- economic implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine area Tasmanian Government submission to the Australian Government - Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities October 2011 Table of Contents Section Section Heading Page Number Number Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 1 North-West Region – Economic Data 5 2 Sovereign Risk and Uncertainty 12 3 Existing Mining Projects and Developments 12 4 Review of Adverse Impacts on Future Value Adding 19 Projects (Mining) 5 Potential for New Mineral Discovery in the Area 20 Under Assessment for National Heritage Listing 6 Current Regulation of Mineral Exploration and Mining 22 in Tasmania 7 Tourism Overview 23 8 Forestry 24 Conclusion 25 Attachment Comments from Local Government Authorities 27 1 2 Potential Socio-economic implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine area Executive Summary As outlined in the Tasmanian Government’s submission to the Australian Heritage Council on the Proposed National Heritage listing, the Tasmanian Government does not agree with the proposed National Heritage values and boundary listing of the area of North-West Tasmania referred to as the Tarkine. The Government has issues with the approach taken to identifying values within the proposed boundary. In addition, pursuant to section 324JJ (5)(b) of the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999, the Government wishes to draw to the attention of the Minister that it believes serious immediate and long term social impacts should be taken into account which would occur in an already depressed region of Tasmania resulting from the closure of key industries such as mining and forestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Public Environment Report Tarkine Forest Drive Tasmania Reference: EPBC 2011/6210 Table of Contents
    Draft Public Environment Report Tarkine Forest Drive Tasmania Reference: EPBC 2011/6210 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................. i 1. General information ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Title of the action ............................................................................... 1 1.2 Proponent ......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Objective .......................................................................................... 1 1.4 Location ........................................................................................... 1 1.5 Background to the development of the proposed action ................................. 3 1.6 Outcomes and benefits of the proposed action ............................................ 3 1.7 Project justification ............................................................................. 6 1.8 Budget and costs ................................................................................. 9 1.9 Other known actions in the region ........................................................... 9 1.10 Consequences of not proceeding with the action ....................................... 13 2. Description of the action ............................................................................. 15 2.1 Construction programming approach ...................................................... 17 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing the Tarkine
    Valuing the Tarkine: A Systematic Quantification of Optimal Land Use and Potential Conflict Compromise by Jennifer Diana Evans BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Institute for Regional Development and School of Land and Food A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, October 2016 Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Signature Jennifer Diana Evans, BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Date 26 October, 2016 ii Statement of Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signature Jennifer Diana Evans, BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Date 26 October, 2016 iii Statement of Ethical Conduct The research associated with this thesis abides by the international and Australian codes on human and animal experimentation, the guidelines by the Australian Government’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator and the rulings of the Safety, Ethics and Institutional Biosafety Committees of the University. Signature: Jennifer Diana Evans, BA (Env. des.), BArch. Hons. Date: 26 October, 2016 iv Abstract Ecosystems continue to deplete as global demand for natural resources force land use change and cause environmental conflict.
    [Show full text]