DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Communities BUILDING COMMUNITIES THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE PLANNING AND DESIGN Conference Proceedings Publication of the proceedings has been made possible by the following: THE BUILDING AND SOCIAL HOUSING FOUNDATION HUNT THOMPSON ASSOCIATES YJ LOVELL (HOLDINGS) PLC THE NORTH BRITISH INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION RIBA COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE GROUP .. BUILDING COMMUNITIES THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE PLANNING AND DESIGN CONFERENCE PRESIDENT DR ROD HACKNEY CONFERENCE CHAIRMEN THE LORD SCARMAN OBE DR THOMAS L. BLAIR SIMON JENKINS TED WATKINS KEYNOTE SPEAKER HRH THE PRINCE OF WALES KG KT GCB Conference Proceedings EDITED BY COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE INFORMATION SERVICES (CAIS) LTD CAIS LTD LONDON First published in Great Britain by Conference Organisers: Community Architecture Information Services (CAIS) Ltd Community Architecture Information Services (CAIS) Ltd 5 Dryden Street, Covent Garden, London WC2E 9NW 5 Dryden Street, Covent Garden, London WC2E 9NW Distributed by RIBA Publications Ltd Telephone: 01 240 2430 Telex: 299533 ASTG Fax: 01 240 5600 Finsbury Mission, Moreland Street, London ECIV 8VB Directors: Charles Knevitt, Jim Sneddon, Caroline Theobald, Nick Wates. © 1987 Community Architecture Information Services Ltd Conference Co-ordinator: Jim Sneddon All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, Conference Administrators: stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any London Conferences Ltd means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or 15 Bindon Close, Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5PX otherwise, without the prior permission of the Copyright owner Administrator: Jane Ahern ISBN 0-947877-71-1 Public Relations: Stratton & Reekie Filmset in Great Britain by Quorn Selective Repro Ltd, II Dartmouth Street, London SW I H 9BL Loughborough, Leicestershire Printed by BAS Printers, Over Wallop, Hampshire and bound by British Otabind Limited, Colchester, Essex ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge the generous support and assistance the following gave to the organisation of the First International Conference on Community Architecture, Planning and Design and without whose help it would not have been possible. Sponsors: Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies Astoria Theatre Decoration BOVIS LTD Institute of Clerks of Works Free Form Arts Trust THE BUILDER GROUP Institute of Housing CALOUSTE GULBENKIAN International Year of Shelter for the FOUNDATION Homeless 1987 The organisers would also like to thank all LONDON DOCKLANDS International Project for Students of those who assisted including: DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Architecture The Architectural Association REGALIAN PROPERTIES PLC International Bauausstellung Berlin YWCA RANK XEROX LTD The Landscape Institute Building Design TRAFALGAR HOUSE National Architecture Students Association Architects Journal TRUSTHOUSE FORTE PLC National Community Partnership Chartered Surveyor Weekly WATES FOUNDATION National Council of Building Material Building Producers Geoff Haslam Supporting Organisations National Council for Voluntary Peter Rawsthorne The Archbishop's Commission Organisations Anne South Association of Community Technical Aid National Federation of Community Mikki Hawkes Centres Organisations Caroline Dove Association of Metropolitan Authorities National Federation of Housing Amanda Reekie British Institute of Architectural Technicians Associations Deborah Stratton Building Centre Trust The Phoenix Initiative Rebecca Smithers Building Employers' Confederation Royal Institute of British Architects Vic Dabrowa (photographer) Business in the Community Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Kathy Howe Chartered Institute of Building Royal Town Planning Institute Kate Theobald Civic Trust SAVE Britain's Heritage Virginia Bond Commission for Racial Equality Think Green Campaign Caroline Lwin Community Projects Foundation Town and Country Planning Association Flo Harvey Construction Industry Federation Village Halls Forum Beverley Padda Co-operative Development Agency Doreen Walker English Heritage Exhibition Design and Co-ordination Kevin Jenden Free Form Arts Trust Covent Garden Housing Project Elaine Rigby Friends of the Earth Hunt Thompson Associates Stella Yarrow Habitat International Council Nottingdale Urban Studies Centre Kelly Code Housing Associations Charitable Trust Jeanne Sillet and Brendan O'Neill Kim Ward IV .. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IV FOREWORD vn BUILDING AND SOCIAL HOUSING FOUNDATION AWARDS VIII INTRODUCTION x CONFERENCE PROGRAMME XIII LIST OF RESOLUTIONS XVI EDITORS' NOTE XVIII CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT 1 WORKSHOP REPORTS 139 LIST OF EXHIBITORS 146 LIST OF FILMS SHOWN 146 MEDIA COVERAGE REPORT 149 LIST OF DELEGATES 1s2 .. A GUIDE TO COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE WHAT MAKES COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE DIFFERENT? CONVENTIONAL ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE Users are passive recipients of an environment Users are - or are treated as - the clients. conceived, executed, managed and evaluated They are offered (or take) control of commis­ STATUS OF USER by others: corporate, public or private sector sioning, designing, developing, managing and landowners and developers with professional evaluating their environment and may some­ 'experts' times be physically involved in construction Remote, arm's length. Little if any direct con­ Creative alliance and working partnership. tact. Experts commissioned by landowners Experts are commissioned by, and are ac­ USER/EXPERT and developers occasionally make superficial countable to, users or behave as if they are RELATIONSHIP attempts to define and consult end-users, but their attitudes are mostly paternalistic and patronising Provider, neutral bureaucrat, elitist, 'one of Enabler, facilitator and 'social entrepreneur', them', manipulator of people to fit the system, educator, 'one of us', manipulator of the EXPERT ROLES a professional in the institutional sense. system to fit the people and challenger of Remote and inaccessible status quo, a professional as a competent and efficient adviser. Locally based and accessible Generally large and often cumbersome. Deter­ Generally small, responsive and determined SCALE OF mined by pattern of land ownership and the by the nature of the project, the local building PROJECT need for efficient mass production and simple industry and the participants. Large sites management generally broken down into manageable packages Fashionable and wealthy existing residential, Anywhere, but most likely to be urban, or LOCATION OF commercial and industrial areas preferred. periphery of urban area, area of single or PROJECT Otherwise a greenfield site with infrastructure multiple deprivation, derelict or decaying (roads, power, water supply and drainage etc) environment ie no constraints Likely to be a single function or two or three Likely to be multi-functional USE OF PROJECT complementary activities (eg commercial, or housing, or industrial) Self-conscious about style; most likely 'inter­ Unself-conscious about style. Any 'style' may national' or 'modern movement'. Increasingly be adopted and appropriate. Most likely to be DESIGN STYLE one of the other fashionable and identifiable 'contextual', 'regional' (as place specific) with styles: post-modern, hi-tech, neo-vernacular concern for identity. Loose and sometimes or Classical revival. Restrained and sometimes exuberant, often highly decorative, using local frigid; utilitarian artists Tendency towards mass production, pre­ Tendency towards: small-scale production, on fabrication, repetition, global supply of site construction, individuality, local supply TECHNOLOGY/ materials, machine-friendly technology, 'clean of materials, user-friendly (convivial) tech­ RESOURCES 'clean sweep' and new build, machine inten­ nology, re-use, recycling and conservation, sive, capital intensive labour and time intensive Static, slowly deteriorates, hard to manage Flexible, slowly improving, easy to manage END PRODUCT and maintain, high-energy consumption and maintain, low-energy consumption ' Private sector: return on investment (usually Improvement of quality of life for individuals short-term) and narrow self interest. and communities. Better use of local resources PRIMARY Public sector: social welfare and party political Social investments. Response to specific local­ MOTIVATION opportunism. Experts: esteem from profes­ ised needs and opportunities sional peers. Response to general national or regional gap in market or social needs and opportunities Top down, emphasis on product rather than Bottom up, emphasis on process rather than process, bureaucratic, centralised with special­ product, flexible, localised, holistic and multi­ METHOD OF isms compartmentalised, stop-go, impersonal, disciplinary, evolutionary, continuous, per­ OPERATION anonymous, paper management, avoid setting sonal, familiar, people management, setting a precedent, secretive precedents, open Totalitarian technocratic and doctrinative Pragmatic, humanitarian, responsive and IDEOLOGY (Left or Right), big is beautiful, competition, flexible, small is beautiful, collaboration, survival of the fittest mutual aid • Chart from Community Architecture; How people are creating their own environment by Nick Watcs and Charles Knevitt, Penguin Books, forthcoming . • Foreword DR ROD HACKNEY, PRIBA Conference President For two days last November, the Astoria Theatre in the conference took place and achieved its objectives. London's Charing Cross Road thronged with more The community architecture movement,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issues and Options Topic Papers
    Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Joint Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document Issues and Options Topic Papers February 2012 Strategic Planning Tameside MBC Room 5.16, Council Offices Wellington Road Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 6DL Tel: 0161 342 3346 Email: [email protected] For a summary of this document in Gujurati, Bengali or Urdu please contact 0161 342 8355 It can also be provided in large print or audio formats Local Development Framework – Core Strategy Issues and Options Discussion Paper Topic Paper 1 – Housing 1.00 Background • Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) • Regional Spatial Strategy North West • Planning for Growth, March 2011 • Manchester Independent Economic Review (MIER) • Tameside Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) • Tameside Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 (SHMA) • Tameside Unitary Development Plan 2004 • Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 • Tameside Sustainable Community Strategy 2009-2019 • Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment • Tameside Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 1.01 The Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 is underpinned by a range of studies and evidence based reports that have been produced to respond to housing need at a local level as well as reflecting the broader national and regional housing agenda. 2.00 National Policy 2.01 At the national level Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) sets out the planning policy framework for delivering the Government's housing objectives setting out policies, procedures and standards which Local Planning Authorities must adhere to and use to guide local policy and decisions. 2.02 The principle aim of PPS3 is to increase housing delivery through a more responsive approach to local land supply, supporting the Government’s goal to ensure that everyone has the opportunity of living in decent home, which they can afford, in a community where they want to live.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hattersley and Mottram Housing Estate: an Evaluation of Its Regeneration
    Heseltine Institute for Public Policy, Practice and Place The Hattersley and Mottram housing estate: An evaluation of its regeneration Produced for Onward Homes by Dr Paul Hepburn and Dr Matthew Thompson, University of Liverpool May 2018 2 | THE HATTERSLEY AND MOTTRAM HOUSING ESTATE: AN EVALUATION OF ITS REGENERATION CONTENTS | 3 Contents List of figures Report headlines ........................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 1 Aerial view over the Hattersley estate, looking west towards Manchester city centre ..................................................................................... 15 Report summary .........................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Figure 2 Map showing Hattersley’s location ....................................................................................................................................................................................17 The Collaboration Agreement .................................................................................................................................................................................8 Figure 3 The original outline plan for the Hattersley overspill estate .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Geographies of Manchester's Housing Problems
    Mapping the geographies of Manchester’s housing problems and the twentieth century 3 solutions Martin Dodge “Manchester is a huge overgrown village, built according to no definite plan. The factories have sprung up along the rivers Irk, Irwell and Medlock, and the Rochdale Canal. The homes of the work-people have been built in the factory districts. The interests and convenience of the manufacturers have determined the growth of the town and the manner of that growth, while the comfort, health and happiness have not been consid- ered. … Every advantage has been sacrificed to the getting of money.” Dr. Roberton, a Manchester surgeon, in evidence to the Parliamentary Committee on the Health of Towns, 1840 (quoted in Bradshaw, 1987). The industrial city and its housing mid-nineteenth century, private estates of substan- conditions tial suburban villas were constructed, away from Where people live and the material housing the poverty and pollution of the inner industrial conditions they enjoy has been a central concern neighbourhoods. An example of these early to geographers, planners and scholars in housing suburban housing developments for the elites studies and urban sociology throughout the was Victoria Park, planned in 1837; large detached twentieth century. The multifaceted challenge mansions on tree lined avenues were built in the of adequately housing an expanding population 1840s and 1850s. The goal was to provide a sense has been at the heart of the history of Manchester of seclusion and tranquillity of countryside, but and its changing geography. From the city’s rapid with proximity to the city centre and commercial industrialisation in the 1780s onwards, through activity; gated entrances to estates were installed physical growth into a metropolis with global to enforce social exclusivity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unitarian Heritage an Architectural Survey of Chapels and Churches in the Unitarian Tradition in the British Isles
    UNITARIP The Unitarian Heritage An Architectural Survey of Chapels and Churches in the Unitarian tradition in the British Isles. Consultant: H.1. McLachlan Text and Research: G~ahamHague Text and Book Design: Judy Hague Financial Manager: Peter Godfrey O Unitarian Heritage 1986. ISBN: Q 9511081 O 7 Disrributur. Rev P B. Codfrey, 62 Hastlngs Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshirc. S7 2GU. Typeset by Sheaf Graphics, 100 Wellington Street, Sheffield si 4HE Printed in England. The production of this book would have been impossible without the generous help and hospitality of numerous people: the caretakers, secretaries and ministers oi chapels, and those now occupying disused chapels; the staff of public libraries and archives in many towns and cities; the bus and train dr~verswho enabled us to visit nearly every building. We would like to record grateful thanks to the staff of Dx Williams's Library and the National Monument Record for their always courteous help; Annette Percy for providing the typescript; Charrnian Laccy for reading and advising on the scnpt; and to the North Shore Unitarian Veatch Program, and District Associations in the British Isles for their generous financial help. Sla~rmsa.Burv St Edmunds. Unirarjan Chapel. 5 Contents: Introduction Chapter 1: The Puritans before 1662 2: The Growth of Dissent 1662-1750 Gazetteer 1662-1750 3: New Status, New Identity, New Technology 1750-1 840 Gazetteer 1750-18411 4: The Gothic Age 1840-1918 Gazetteer 1840-1918 5: Decay, Destruction and Renewal 1918-1984 Top photogruph c. 1900 cf Bessels Green Old Meeting House (1716). Gazetteer 1918-1984 Below. engravmg of 1785 91 Slockron-on-Tees,meeung-house on nghr 6: The Unitarian Chapels of Wales Gazetteer 7: The Unitarian Chapels of Scotland by Andrew Hi11 Gazetteer 8: Chapels of the Non-Subscribing Presbyterian Church of Ireland by John McLachlan Gazetteer Maps and Plans Bibliography Index Chapters I to 8 are each composcd a/ an introduction, an alp~ab~t~ca.
    [Show full text]
  • New Deal for Communities National Evaluation Phase 2
    New Deal for Communities national evaluation phase 2 Technical report This research was commissioned by the previous government and is not necessarily a reflection of the current government’s policies and priorities. DCLG is publishing this report in the interests of transparency. March 2015 Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Department for Communities and Local Government © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2015 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visitis http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. This document/publication is also available on our website at www.gov.uk/dclg Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: Department for Communities and Local Government Fry Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF Telephone: 030 3444 0000 For all our latest news and updates follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CommunitiesUK March 2015 ISBN: 978-1-4098-3161-7 Acknowledgements We would like to thank all of members of the evaluation team involved in the 2005- 2010 second phase of the national evaluation. Thanks are especially due to the following: Peter Tyler and Angela Brennan at Cambridge Economic Associates; Richard
    [Show full text]
  • Housing, Memory and the Post-War State: Resident Experiences, Regeneration and the Council Estate in Manchester, 1945-2010
    Housing, Memory and the Post-War State: Resident Experiences, Regeneration and the Council Estate in Manchester, 1945-2010 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Paula Smalley School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents Table of Figures 4 Abbreviations 6 Abstract 7 Declaration 8 Copyright Statement 9 Acknowledgements 10 Introduction - Housing, Memory and the Post-War State 12 The ‘Problem’ Estate 14 Persistent Narratives of British Council Housing 18 Testimonies of Experience 30 The Structure of the Thesis 41 Chapter One - House and Home in Post-War Britain 47 Home as Social Policy 53 Home as Emotional Practice 73 Narrating the State on the Council Estate 88 Conclusion 97 Chapter Two - The Remembered Slum 100 The Legitimating ‘Slum’ 107 What Was, and What Ought to Be 123 Separating ‘Slum’ and Community 131 Conclusion 141 Chapter Three - Dreaming of the New World, Living in the New World 144 The State’s Narratives 150 ‘Outsider’ Narratives 163 ‘Insider’ Narratives 179 A Return to Clearance: On-going Beliefs in the Power of the Environment 189 Conclusion 208 Chapter Four - Regeneration: Continuities in the Inner City 211 The Uses of Neoliberalism 220 Continuities in British Regeneration Practice 225 Is Regeneration Novel? Case Studies of Grove Village and West Gorton 242 Conclusion 257 Conclusion 259 Bibliography 266 Primary Material 266 Archival Sources 266 Online Archives and Sources 269 Printed Primary Sources 269 2 Newspapers, Trade Journals and Magazines 272 Oral History Interviews 272 Television and Film 273 Websites 273 Secondary Material 274 Articles 274 Books 286 Unpublished Theses 292 Working Papers and Research Papers 293 Appendix I 294 Example Recruitment Flyer (West Gorton) 294 Example Recruitment Poster/Flyer (Ardwick/Longsight) 295 Appendix II 296 Sample Interview Questions 296 Word Count: 72, 114 3 Table of Figures Figure 1.1 Ardwick Grove Village 1200m.
    [Show full text]
  • The 39 NDC Areas Brief Pen Portraits
    NDC National Evaluation The 39 NDC Areas Brief Pen Portraits CRESR Sheffield Hallam University November 2005 NDC NATIONAL EVALUATION The 39 NDC Areas Brief Pen Portraits The first phase of the national evaluation of the New Deal for Communities Programme has culminated in an Interim report covering the period 2001-2005. This has been made available on the NRU/ODPM’s web site: http://www.neighbourhood.gov.uk This brief paper provides an overview of all 39 NDC areas. It is designed to help readers appreciate the context within which Partnerships operate and the some of the problems they face The 39 NDC Areas: Brief Pen-Portraits NDC name Area description Bradford: Bradford Trident Bradford Trident NDC is an area of approximately one square mile on the outskirts of Bradford city centre and is made up of three of the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods within Bradford: Little Horton, Marshfields and West Bowling. Over 50 per cent of the population from these distinct communities are of South Asian heritage. Housing stock dates from the Victorian and Edwardian areas but also includes newer properties and more than a third of residents live in social rented accommodation. Brent: South Kilburn NDC The NDC consists of a group of social housing estates lying to the west of Kilburn High Road, constructed in the 1950’s and 1960’s. The remainder of the NDC area extends as a long arm along Kilburn Lane and mostly comprises late Victorian and Edwardian terrace housing. There are retail and commercial premises scattered relatively throughout the area, but local transport is good, and only a minority of people work in the immediate vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter1- Introduction 1.0 Introduction
    "Investigation of double skin facades: Irish buildings between 2012-2006" Aidan Walsh Department of Architecture Bachelor of Architectural technology (Honours) "Investigation of double skin facades: Irish buildings between 2012-2006" Aidan Walsh Project supervisor: Declan Fallon Date: March 2013 Acknowledgements 2013 Acknowledgements This dissertation represents work that has been undertaken between September 2012 to March 2013. Many offered assistance and help in the research and the following deserve a special word of thanks. Declan Fallon, dissertation supervisor, for his invaluable help, advice and guidance throughout the time period. Dr. Garrett O'Sullivan, Lecturer CIT, for his time advice and direction. David Flannery, Architect with Scott Tallon Walker, for time taken to answer my questions CIT library staff, for their help in sourcing research material. Fidelma McDonagh, Architect with ABK, for time taken to answer my questions. Sandra O'Connell, Architecture Ireland, for time taken to answer my questions. To friends and family for their help and support throughout the research. Architectural Technology (BSc Honours) i Synopsis 2013 Synopsis Name: Aidan Walsh Title: Investigation of double skin facades: Irish buildings between 2012-2006 The aim of this research is to evaluate the use of double skin facades on public buildings with particular reference to Irish buildings between 2012 and 2006. It is to examine the typology and evolution of double skin facades and how they have developed in Ireland. To achieve the above, the research follows a set five step methodology. The first step is to outline the aims and objectives to outline what exactly it is that the dissertation is hoping to achieve.
    [Show full text]
  • National Framework – Legislation and Economy Inter-War Period Surveys Slumland
    National framework – legislation and economy Inter-war period surveys Slumland – private and municipal Overcrowding, dampness, leaking roofs, broken doors and windows, crumbling plaster work, rats and beetles Poor sanitation – lack of water supply, shared toilets Shame and stigma Bomb damage, slums, growing demand Land-trap Overspill – Langley, Hattersley, etc Resistance from other local authorities Limited expansion – barriers Socio-cultural opposition – stigma Housing policy was industrial scale Problems and pressures were mounting Solutions were industrial Policies reinforced social division Estates and the ‘inner city’ – residualization New inner city, monlithic structures Presented as an extension of civic pride – modernism, clean, new, communal. Beswick, Harpurhey, Ardwick Hulme – the new Bath ‘Fort Beswick’ - Poor design, cost cutting, rapid decay, dampness, vandalism, noise and condensation Hulme Crescents- broken lifts, which also suffered from poor lighting , the pungent smell of urine, inadequate refuse disposal , rubbish left rotting on landings, excrement, noise Bloomsbury to Colditz Economic crisis, moratorium, financial crisis New slums for old - demolition Economy – housing policy determined by the national economy. National legislation provides a framework which determines the shape of policy, but local problems, challenges and issues provided a series of obstacles. Housing policy was always a top-down process. Tenants were recipients. Policy was ‘area’ driven.’ The choices made resulted in a new type of Slumland – the inner city estate. Culturally as well as spatially,, the ‘inner city’ replaced the ‘slum.’ A process of residualization was reinforced by policy. Until the early 1990s, at no stage were people empowered with choice or involvement in the decision-making process. No alternatives to the industrial scale, area approach.
    [Show full text]
  • University College Dublin UCD Architecture School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy
    University College Dublin UCD Architecture School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy Architecture Programme Report NAAB Substantial Equivalency Visit Three July 2017 Amended: 2nd October 2017 University College Dublin Architecture Program Report Visit Three 1 Degree Programme Proposed: Master of Architecture (MArch) Program Administrator: Mr Daniel P. Sudhershan Associate Dean and Chair of ALPEP Programme Board UCD School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, Richview Campus, Belfield, Dublin 4 email: [email protected] Tel: 353 1 716 2720 Programme Coordinator: Mr Emmett Scanlon Programme Coordinator of MArch UCD School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, Richview Campus, Belfield, Dublin 4 email: [email protected] Head of Academic Unit: Prof. Hugh Campbell Dean of Architecture and Head of School UCD School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, Richview Campus, Belfield, Dublin 4 email: [email protected] Tel: 353 1 716 2787 Chief Academic Officer: Prof. Mark Rogers UCD Registrar Office of Registrar Tierney Building, Belfield, Dublin 4 email: [email protected] Tel: 353 1 716 1404 President: Professor Andrew J Deeks UCD President Office of President Tierney Building, Belfield, Dublin email: [email protected] Tel: 353 1 716 1618 University College Dublin Architecture Program Report Visit Three 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Institutional Support and Commitment to Continuous Improvement 54 1.1 Identity & Self-Assessment 5 1.1.1 History and Mission 5 1.1.2 Learning Culture
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded for Personal Non-Commercial Research Or Study, Without Prior Permission Or Charge
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE PRESS AND PLANNING by C. S. Richardson Submitted as part of the Department of Town and requirements for the Degree Regional Planning, of Master of Philosophy. University of Glasgow. APRIL 1975 • ProQuest Number: 10800604 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10800604 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Spaces and Sustainable Communities Final Report to BIG March 2008
    Green Spaces and Sustainable Communities Final Report to BIG March 2008 This report was researched and written for the Big Lottery Fund by Sally Downs Associates in collaboration with Alison Millward Associates Copyright: Big Lottery Fund 2008 Published by: Big Lottery Fund 1 Plough Place, London, EC4A 1DE Tel: 0207 211 1800 Fax:0207 211 1750 Email: e&[email protected] Use of material in this report must be appropriately acknowledged. © The Big Lottery Fund Evaluation of the Green Spaces and Sustainable Communities programme Final Report to the Big Lottery Fund, February 2008 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Evaluation Team: Mike Dando Sally Downs (Project Director) David Haffey Stephen Hughes Alison Millward 2 Evaluation of the Green Spaces and Sustainable Communities programme Final Report to the Big Lottery Fund, February 2008 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of contents Executive Summary …………………………………………………………… 5 1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………15 2 Key features of the initiative …………………………………………. 25 3 Reaching out to disadvantage ………………………………………. 30 4 Community involvement and building social capital ……………. 42 5 Contributing to sustainable development .………………………… 51 6 Review of overall performance .……………………………………… 60 7 The Award Partner route to delivery ……………………………….. 77 8 Lessons for future programmes …………………………………….. 95 List of annexes Annex 1 Terms and acronyms ……………………………………………96 Annex 2
    [Show full text]