DOCSLIB.ORG

Clay Pit Pond Deforestation Damages Wetland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clay Pit Pond Deforestation Damages Wetland Belmont Citizens Forum Clay Pit Pond Deforestation Damages Wetland By Judy Singler In September 2020, several Belmont residents removed more than 80 trees and shrubs from the south side of Clay Pit Pond. In an unauthorized action taken ostensibly to “enhance” the view of the pond, individuals visited the site on at least three occasions that month, cutting down 50-foot-tall trees, shrubs, vines, and other vegetation. The remaining trees at the edge of the pond were pruned of side branches to a height of 20 feet and more. Town officials eventually ordered a halt to the illegal tree cutting after calls from several concerned citizens. Environmental Laws Exist to Protect our Wetlands Cutting vegetation within 100 feet of a protected body of water is subject to state wetlands laws and requires a permit from the town’s Conservation Commission (ConCom). In this case, no permit was requested or granted. In October, when the ConCom became aware of this activity, members began discussing options for the town. The contractor origi- SINGLER JUDY nally hired for management of Bare ground, erosion, and cut stumps after illegal tree invasive species around the pond had removal at Clay Pit Pond. been unable to perform the work due to the Covid-19 crisis. He will inspect the pond due to large areas without soil-stabi- the site to assess current needs. lizing vegetation near the shoreline. Because many tree and shrub stumps remained near the pond, creating a hazard The Conservation Commission’s Role to visitors, the Department of Public Works This activity at Clay Pit Pond reveals the need arranged for a contractor to remove the larger for greater understanding in the community stumps in December, even as citizens raised of our wetland areas and the regulations that concerns about possible erosion and siltation at protect them. In 1964, Massachusetts passed its May/June 2021 Preserving Belmont’s Small-Town Atmosphere Vol. 22, No.3 Wetland Protection Act, Massachusetts General Michael Santoro from the Department of Public Belmont Citizens Forum Laws (MGL) Chapter 131, Section 40. This law Works, as well as some concerned citizens. provides specific protections to wetlands and the The site showed a great deal of exposed Officers public interest, including flood and pollution land, with many small stumps from shrubs Grant Monahon, President control, as well as groundwater supplies and protruding from loose soil, with exposed roots John Dieckmann, Vice President wildlife habitat. It requires a thorough review lining the banks. Some siltation was evident as Evanthia Malliris, Secretary of all proposed work that may impact any well as several locations with minor erosion. wetlands. Concerns were voiced over coming spring Radha Iyengar, Treasurer At the local level, Belmont’s ConCom admin- rains and the need for actions to mitigate isters the Wetlands Protection Act. This seven- the extensive loss of trees and shrubs. Initial Directors member volunteer board is appointed by the plans include hiring a consultant to survey the Sumner Brown Select Board and works with conservation agent area and provide recommendations. The land David Chase Mary Trudeau to review and approve applica- between the path and the pond banks needs to Vincent Stanton, Jr. tions for work covered by the act. be stabilized immediately. At the state level, the Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) provides A Path Forward Newsletter technical training to local conservation commis- The ongoing situation at Clay Pit Pond Meg Muckenhoupt, Executive Editor sions and oversees administration of the law demonstrates the need for citizens to be Jeffrey North, Managing Editor and develops policies and regulations, including aware of activity taking place in the town Sue Bass, Newsletter Committee, fines for violations. Violators of the Wetlands and to speak out when unusual actions are Director Emerita Protection Act may be ordered to restore the occurring. Meanwhile, advocating for appro- Virginia Jordan, Evanthia Malliris, property to its original condition and take other priate follow-up to this unauthorized work at Vincent Stanton, Jr. actions to mitigate the effects of the violation. Clay Pit Pond could show how the town and In addition, they may incur criminal fines up community can work together to resolve a to $25,000, imprisonment of up to two years, serious environmental problem. Belmont Citizens Forum Inc. is a not-for- or both, or a civil penalty of up to $25,000 for The unlawful and ecologically damaging profit organization that strives to maintain each violation. Each day a violation continues is assault on the pond has created broader the small-town atmosphere of Belmont, considered a separate offense. SINGLER JUDY awareness of the need to stabilize the bank and Massachusetts, by preserving its natural and Anyone wanting to work in a wetland resource manage the vegetation, especially the invasive historical resources, limiting traffic growth, area or within 100 feet of a wetland (the buffer Shoreline damage at Clay Pit Pond. plant species, around the entire pond. As a and enhancing pedestrian safety. We do this zone) must obtain prior approval from the part of Belmont’s stormwater system, Clay Pit by keeping residents informed about planning ConCom. Wetlands protection regulations are specifies any special requirements needed to Pond is a significant resource, though one which and zoning issues, by participating actively in quite specific about the extent and type of work protect the public interests. Permits are denied requires regular assessment and care. public hearings, and by organizing forums. allowed. Activities covered include vegetation if the impacts to the resource areas cannot be At the March 30 ConCom meeting Trudeau removal, regrading, and home construction, avoided or mitigated. These decisions may be indicated her intent to seek funding to support appealed to MassDEP. The BCF Newsletter is published six times a including additions, decks, and driveways. a study of the needs of the pond. Town admin- year, in January, March, May, July, September, Commercial and industrial areas are also covered Surveying the Damage istrator Garvin has said that she will look for and November. Published material represents by the regulations. federal and state grants and other funding Obtaining a permit from the ConCom Meanwhile, the land around Clay Pit Pond to support this effort. In this, she will follow the views of the authors and not necessarily requires filing of a Notice of Intent which has suffered a considerable injury. Permits guidance from Trudeau and the ConCom. those of the Belmont Citizens Forum. includes the details of the proposed project, were never requested by citizens, who assumed A review of the broader ecological health location of wetland resource areas and buffer their actions would be helpful to the town. of the pond and a plan for its sustainability is Letters to the editor may be sent to zones, and steps that will be taken to protect Town officials must decide how to mitigate this essential to an effective action plan to assure P. O. Box 609, Belmont MA 02478 or to them. ConCom representatives might visit the damage and restore the soil around the pond that Clay Pit Pond will continue to be a valuable [email protected] site to verify the boundaries of the protected before erosion and siltation affect water quality. asset to Belmont and its residents. areas, and typically a public hearing is held to On March 8, the ConCom visited Clay Pit belmontcitizensforum.org allow abutters and other community members to Pond to view the site and discuss planning for © 2021 Belmont Citizens Forum. All rights reserved. ask questions or voice concerns. mitigation and restoration. Also in attendance Judy Singler is a member of the Council on Aging Following the hearing, the ConCom will issue were Patrice Garvin, town administrator; Roy and the Housing Trust and a Town Meeting member a permit known as an Order of Conditions, that Epstein, Select Board chair; and Jay Marcotte and for Precinct 6. 2 belmontcitizensforum.org May/June 2021 3 Belmont Has One Year to Clean up Waterways Pollution upstream doesn’t always make it to the downstream outlet By Anne-Marie Lambert Route 2, for example, outlet 15A by Frontage Road near Radcliffe Road went from over 14,900 A 2017 consent order from the US E. coli MPN/100 ml in 2017 to under 100 MPN Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gave after a 2020 project to reline and repair mains Belmont five years to stop underground sewage under Knox, Herman, and Bellington Streets. from leaking into our waterways. We made a lot The EPA threshold is 235 E. coli MPN/100 ml. of progress in 2020, but there could be a long In other areas of town, water quality improved way to go before all our outlets run clean. after significant rehabilitation, but still not In 2020, the town undertook a $550,000 enough to meet EPA requirements. Work in the sewer system rehabilitation construction project Oliver Road neighborhood should address water (SSRCP). More work is planned in 2021 under quality issues at outlets 11, 11A, and 12. In other a sump pump removal and sewer rehabilitation areas, there is no more construction or inves- contract. The SSRCP included significant work tigative work planned. The hope is that after such as: recent repair work, the system will eventually ● Repairing and lining several sewer mains run clean. ● Lining many sewer service laterals Rehabilitation work is planned on Hoitt and ● Removing a few sewer service laterals from the Westlund Roads in the lower part of catchment Pollution (E.coli MPN/100 ml) drain system 10. More investigation is planned in 2021 to Before (2017) After (2020) ● Replacing several sewer and drain segments Sub-catchment Location discover additional upstream sources of sewage that are beyond repair 1-4A Fairview and Van Ness from easment 7,000 12,300 infiltration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Horsley Witten Group Technical Analysis Upper Alewife Brook Basin
    +RUVOH\:LWWHQ*URXS 6XVWDLQDEOH(QYLURQPHQWDO6ROXWLRQV 5RXWH$6DQGZLFK0$ 3KRQH)D[ZZZKRUVOH\ZLWWHQFRP 7HFKQLFDO$QDO\VLV 8SSHU$OHZLIH%URRN%DVLQ ,PSDFW6WXG\ )HEUXDU\ 3UHSDUHGIRU (OOHQ0DVV )ULHQGVRI$OHZLIH5HVHUYDWLRQ $OHZLIH%URRN3DUNZD\ %HOPRQW0$ 6SRQVRUHGE\ %HOPRQW/DQG7UXVW &DPEULGJH*UHHQ %HOPRQW&LWL]HQV)RUXP Upper Alewife Brook Watershed Technical Analysis Table of Contents Page 1.0 Purpose 1 2.0 The Study Area 1 3.0 Flooding and Stormwater 2 4.0 Habitat 6 5.0 Water Quality 8 6.0 Smart Growth and Low Impact Development 10 7.0 References 11 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 ± Hydrologic Analysis 3 Table 2 ± Scientific Studies on Wildlife Habitat at the Belmont Uplands 6 Table 3 ± Phosphorus Loading Analysis 9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 ± Mystic River Watershed and Subbasins Figure 2 ± FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer Alewife Subbasin Figure 3 ± Recharge Rates Figure 4 ± Impervious Cover Alewife Subbasin Figure 5 ± Impervious Cover vs. Native Fish Species Figure 6 ± Phosphorus Loading Rates 8 Figure 7 ± Phosphorus Loading Analysis 9 Figure 8 ± Low Impact Development Stormwater BMPs Technical Analysis ± Upper Alewife Brook Watershed 1.0 Purpose This report was prepared to provide the towns of Arlington, Belmont and Cambridge a clear understanding of the hydrologic and ecological considerations associated with continued development of environmentally-sensitive lands associated with the upper Alewife Brook Watershed which includes Little River in Cambridge and several ponds and streams. A specific focus is provided on the proposed development project at the Belmont Uplands site which is characterized by Charles Katuska, PVVS, Chair conservation Commission in Sutton, as a silver maple forest monoculture. The report provides a technical summary of flooding, habitat, water quality, and climate change as they substantially affect the regional subject area.
    [Show full text]
  • Watertown, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D), and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Status
    Spy Lexington Pond Winns Brook MA71040_2008 Arlington Spy Pond (5) MA71-09_2008 2 Little Winn Brook (5) Pond MA71-04_2008 Alewife Brook (5) Alewife Brook Jerrys MA72-28_2008 Clay Pit Pond Pond Beaver Brook (5) (TMDL) Belmont BeaverBeaver BrookBrook MA71011_2008 Clematis Brook Clay Pit Pond (5) 3 60 MA71005_2008 Blacks Nook (5) Waltham Cambridge Lilly Fresh Pond Pond Cambridge Reservoir 20 16 Watertown MA72-32_2008 MA72-07_2008 Unnamed tributary (4a) (TMDL) Charles River (5) (TMDL) MA72-30_2008 Unnamed Tributary (5) (TMDL) MA72-36_2008 Cheese Cake Brook Cheese Cake Brook Charles River (5) (TMDL) Charles River 16 90 20 MA72-29_2008 Cheese Cake Brook (5) (TMDL) Boston Newton MA72017_2008 Chandler Pond (5) Chandler Pond Notes: MA72011_2008 1) Adapted from Final Massachusetts Year 2008 Integrated List of Waters; Bulloughs Pond (5) available at http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/08list2.pdf Bulloughs 2) Waterbodies shown without an identified category are assigned30 as Category 3 by definition. Pond 3) For additional information on TMDLs and to view reports, see: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htmMA72023_2008 Chestnut Hill 4) ForChestnut Massachusetts Hill ReservoirSurface Water (3) QualityReservoir Standards, and waterbody classesBrookline and uses, see: http://www.mass.gov/dep/service/regulations/314cmr04.pdf 0 0.5 Waterbody Assessment and TMDL Status Miles Map produced by EPA Region I GIS Center Map Tracker ID 6678, February 25, 2010 Watertown, MA Data Sources: TeleAtlas, Census Bureau, USGS, MassDEP Waterbody Label Assessment of Waterbody Segment Category 4a: TMDL is completed and approved for Waterbodies one or more pollutants State ID, Category 2: Attaining some uses; other uses Waterbody Name (Category) not assessed Impairment not caused by a pollutant.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Classification
    t d S Simpson Lake R t d Cammerino Dam No 1 s d S s Exit 24 R g d C r g P R w g n R L o i r n A a a D o n ed d l l i Laurel Ledge School C y l Res No 3 o l o t R i R r n r r n J d i d i t d i r d d o ge R k C m n Rid r c o o p utum s r R A D t n a W H n R a i o Downs Road Pond r d u a g o ! L w e y s S C n i k a d D e e k r n n B T o Lander Pond Towantic Brook g s n Rd n o 9 H d e no m r R e a d i eb l a L W A L L I N G F O R D d A r a i r u B 6 L r L s o d R n T R r H a y D n D D L Butterworth Pond t C R y F r y k t w w a e a G r k u i m n e n a e l O y o in AA r e n r H lo g i o a o r t t b t m d on W y r A d r H M D D hitn u s e y o r e A y r u a t un Ct q R R s e Res No 2 w ta d h a D E M in S h t B ta t B d P t a R B r an erkins d r o Odd Pond S x m Rd d o o y n a S k k x e C P N n d sv e p o R A a e r d rr le E t o a c y d h w A v n r s P o R e U Chestnut Hill p R d o n pso n n D r r Ln L d R R e r n Butterworth Brook u d L a R d d e a n D C Fairwood Pond L W ATER Q UALITY CLAS S IFICATIONS a n Sheldon Dr n Mill River o o w s h e o D l d n W o l o l ilson R s p Dr d C a B Beacon Falls Station Hockanum Brook W n a i i rc B n w e N D W h s J i o l w B s R a o o r M u L o f n t F d n i so u o 4 D o A u n u r A n r 3 R r d r AA u d e a n s t e a T J ! h d e 6 r p à S M l R e Munson Road Pond s o n t F d M i e o To o A d Sanford Brook z y m r o v F s e t S r n o w d y d d L u a D am a e R x l P d o D w p r R e R w D R 67 Marian Ln E R d a iv C c n M e v H R d h O k l S A r r V R l z y l n R t etha d l i d Butterworth Dam B p i r A a
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Effects of Winter Drawdowns on the Ecological Character of Littoral Zones in Massachusetts Lakes
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses March 2020 INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES Jason R. Carmignani University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Carmignani, Jason R., "INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 1816. https://doi.org/10.7275/j5k1-fz29 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1816 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2020 Organismic and Evolutionary Biology © Copyright by Jason R. Carmignani 2020 All Rights Reserved INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Approved as to style and content by: ___________________________________ Allison H. Roy, Chair ___________________________________ Andy J. Danylchuk, Member ___________________________________ Cristina Cox Fernandes, Member ___________________________________ Peter D. Hazelton, Member ___________________________________ Jason T. Stolarksi, Member ___________________________________ Paige S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices 1 - 5
    2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendices 1 - 5 Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/20 Reporting Cycle Draft for Public Comment Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Table of Contents Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 2. Assessment units and integrated list categories presented alphabetically by major watershed ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 3. Impairments added to the 2018/2020 integrated list .......................................................... 113 Appendix 4. Impairments removed from the 2018/2020 integrated list ................................................. 139 Appendix 5. Impairments changed from the prior reporting cycle .......................................................... 152 2 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Approval/Completion ATTAINS Action ID Report Title Date 5, 6 Total Maximum
    [Show full text]
  • QUINNIPIAC RIVER FUND FINAL REPORT #20170089.Pdf
    QUINNIPIAC RIVER FUND FINAL REPORT- 2017 Please complete and submit completed form via e-mail to [email protected] at The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven by March 30, 2018. Date: 5/30/19 Group/Organization Name: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Address: 195 Prospect Street City, State, & Zip: New Haven, CT 06511 Telephone #: __203-432-5139 Project Name: Mercury in Fish of Ponds of the Quinnipiac River Watershed Grant Number: 20170089 Name & title of person completing this form: Gaboury Benoit, Grinstein Class of 1954 Professor of Environmental Chemistry E-mail address: [email protected] Please respond to the following statements: 1. List the specific objectives/outcomes of the project and tell how they were met during the grant period. Also, provide an update on any special conditions of the grant (if applicable). The objective was to better understand the risk to human health of eating locally caught fish within the Quinnipiac River watershed. Needed is a more detailed understanding of Hg levels by species, by fish age or body size, and by where they are caught (which lakes). This research aimed to provide the first evaluation having high spatial resolution of Hg in fish for the Quinnipiac watershed. Another goal was to afford up to date information on an environmental issue which is clearly changing significantly over time. To achieve these objectives, three lines of evidence were sought: (1) Hg in fish of the Quinnipiac River watershed, (2) water quality characteristics known to promote elevated Hg levels (esp. low pH and alkalinity), and (3) sediment grab samples to evaluate and compare total Hg burdens in the various lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Martha's Vineyard Commission Land Use Planning Committee Notes of the Meeting of April 2, 2007 Held in the Stone Building, New York Avenue, Oak Bluffs
    BOX 1447, OAK BLUFFS, MASSACHUSETTS, 02557, 508-693-3453, FAX 508-693-7894 [email protected] WWW.MVCOMMISSION.ORG Martha's Vineyard Commission Land Use Planning Committee Notes of the Meeting of April 2, 2007 Held in the Stone Building, New York Avenue, Oak Bluffs. 5:30 P.M. Commissioners Present: Christina Brown, Doug Sederholm, Chris Murphy, Richard Toole, Mimi Davisson and Jim Athearn. MVC Staff Present: Mark London, Paul Foley, Bill Wilcox, Jim Miller 1. Middle Line Road (DRI 597) Pre-Public Hearing Review Present for the Applicant: Warren Doty (Selectmen), David Handlin (Architect), Rusty Walton, Steve Schwab (Chilmark Housing Committee). Also in attendance were Riggs Parker (Selectmen), Frank Fenner (Selectmen), Lenny Jason (Middle Line Committee), Chuck Hodgkinson Project Location: 73 Middle Line Road, Chilmark, MA Map 13 Lot 43 (20 acres) Proposal: To create a 9-building, 12-unit affordable housing complex on a 21.4-acre site on Middle Line Road in Chilmark. Applicant’s Presentation • Warren Doty (Selectmen) noted that they had brought a lot of people with them because many people in Chilmark are interested in seeing this project through. • The three people not at the table he introduced are the project engineers Glenn Provost, Reid Silva, and Kent Healy. • They have changed the configuration of the plan. o They are preserving Holman Road with the latest plan. o They have move some of the sites further away from the center towards where the land percolates better. o They feel they have responded to some of the concerns they have heard. • They also want to address several of the MVC policies such as: open space; affordable housing policy; nitrogen loading; archaeology; and NHESP.
    [Show full text]
  • 1983-2015 Fish Toxics Monitoring Survey List
    1983-2015 Fish Toxics Monitoring Survey List Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Divisions of Watershed Management and Environmental Analysis Robert J. Maietta Environmental Analyst Division of Watershed Management CN 279.6 July 29, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE Introduction………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Watershed Map…………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Hoosic River Watershed…………………………………………………………………… 5 Housatonic River Watershed………………………………………………………………. 5 Farmington River Watershed………………………………………………………………. 6 Westfield River Watershed………………………………………………………………… 6 Deerfield River Watershed…………………………………………………………………. 7 Connecticut River Watershed……………………………………………………………… 7 Millers River Watershed…………………………………………………………………… 8 Chicopee River Watershed………………………………………………………………… 9 Quinebaug River Watershed………………………………………………………………. 10 French River Watershed…………………………………………………………………… 10 Blackstone River Watershed………………………………………………………………. 10 Ten Mile River Watershed………………………………………………………………… 12 Narragansett Bay Shore Watershed ………………………………………………………. 12 Mount Hope Bay Shore Watershed……………………………………………………….. 12 Taunton River Watershed………………………………………………………………….. 12 Mystic River Watershed…………………………………………………………………… 13 Charles River Watershed………………………………………………………………….. 14 Neponset River Watershed………………………………………………………………… 15 Weymouth and Weir River Watersheds…………………………………………………… 16 Nashua River Watershed………………………………………………………………… …16 Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord River Watersheds……………………………………… . 17 Shawsheen River Watershed………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Field Records January/ February 1988
    FIELD RECORDS JANUARY/ FEBRUARY 1988 by Glenn d’Entremont, George W. Gove, and Robert H. Stymeist In order to decrease the time between sightings and their publication in Bird Observer, observations from January and February 1988 have been combined and are presented here. This consolidation of sightings allows us to present the available records from January-February in less space than if we showed each month separately. We will, however, return to the usual monthly compilations with March 1988 in the next issue. During the first half of January, cold weather prevailed, with a record 4 degrees below zero recorded on January 14. Temperatures moderated considerably during the last half of the month, although most ponds remained frozen. February was mild and sunny; the temperature averaged 32.2 degrees. The high was 60 degrees on February 1, but in just six days we were back in the deep freeze with 8 degrees on February 7. Precipitation totaled 3.93 inches of rain and 14.1 inches of snow. The seasonal total at the end of February stood at 47.6 inches, 14.7 inches more than normal. The snow on February 12 was especially heavy to handle, hindering traffic and cleanup efforts. R.H.S. LOONS THROUGH WATERFOWL Sixty-five Red-throated Loons were noted off Provincetown on January 16. This total far surpasses the maximum of 37 noted from Nantucket during January-February last year. Red-necked Grebes were especially abundant off Hull and Cohasset, where 150 were tallied on February 28. A Western Grebe was found in Salisbury, and another or the same bird was noted off Wingaersheek Beach between the Salisbury sightings.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisory List Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health (617) 624-5757
    Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisory List Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health (617) 624-5757 WATER BODY TOWN(s) FISH ADVISORY* HAZARD* Aaron River Reservoir Cohasset, Hingham, Scituate P1 (all species), P2 (CP, YP), P4 Mercury Alewife Brook Arlington, Belmont, P1 (C), P3 (C) PCBs Cambridge,Somerville Ames Pond Tewksbury P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Ashland Reservoir Ashland P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Ashley Lake Washington P1 (YP), P3 (YP) Mercury Ashfield Pond Ashfield P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Ashumet Pond Mashpee, Falmouth P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Atkins Reservoir Amherst, Shutesbury P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Attitash, Lake Amesbury, Merrimac P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Badluck Lake Douglas P6 Mercury Baker Pond Brewster, Orleans P1 (YP), P3 (YP) Mercury Baldpate Pond Boxford P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Ballardvale Impoundment of Shawsheen River Andover P1 (LMB & BC), P3 (LMB & BC) Mercury Bare Hill Pond Harvard P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Bearse Pond Barnstable P1 (LMB, SMB), P3 (LMB, SMB) Mercury Beaver Pond Bellingham, Milford P1 (CP, LMB), P3 (CP, LMB) Mercury Big Pond Otis P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Boon, Lake Hudson, Stow P1 (LMB & BC), P3 (LMB & BC) Mercury Box Pond Bellingham, Mendon P1 (WS), P2 (WS) DDT Bracket Reservoir (Framingham Reservoir #2) – See Sudbury River Browning Pond Oakham, Spencer P1 (LMB, YP), P3 (LMB, YP) Mercury Buckley Dunton Lake Becket P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Buffomville Lake Charlton, Oxford P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Burr’s
    [Show full text]
  • Massdot Is Committed to Improving the Quality of Stormwater Runoff from Its Highways
    MassDOT is committed to improving the quality of stormwater runoff from its highways. Through the “Impaired Waters Program,” MassDOT addresses stormwater runoff from its roadways draining to impaired water bodies as part of compliance with the NPDES Phase II Small MS4 General Permit. Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are implemented to the maximum extent practicable through two methods: retrofit projects and programmed projects. Retrofit projects are tracked within the MassDOT Impaired Waters Program Database, while programmed projects are tracked through this Water Quality Data Form (WQDF). The goal of the WQDF is to raise awareness of the necessity to implement stormwater BMPs during programmed projects and to capture information about stormwater BMPs that are implemented. There are two WQDFs required as part of each programmed project. One is specific to the 25% design stage, and the other is specific to the 75% design stage. Please download the latest version of the WQDF from the MassDOT website. Please fill out the tab titled “75% Design Form,” and check the box at the bottom of the form to ensure that all questions have been answered adequately. Please submit this form in Excel format only and name your file with the convention WQDF25_projectnumber.xlsm. Submit the form to your MassDOT project manager as part of the project's electronic submittal. An interactive web map is available to aid in filling out the WQDF. It is available at http://mass.gov/massdot/map/wqdf. If MassDOT has requested that the form be revised and resubmitted, resubmit the form using the naming convention WQDF75_projectnumber_rev.xlsm.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisory List Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health (617) 624-5757 June 2021
    Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisory List Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health (617) 624-5757 June 2021 WATER BODY TOWN(s) FISH ADVISORY* HAZARD* Aaron River Reservoir Cohasset, Hingham, Scituate P1 (all species), P2 (CP, YP), P4 Mercury Alewife Brook and Little River Arlington, Belmont, Cambridge, P1 (C), P3 (C) PCBs Somerville Ames Pond Tewksbury P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Ashland Reservoir Ashland P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Ashley Lake Washington P1 (YP), P3 (YP) Mercury Ashfield Pond Ashfield P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Ashmere Lake Hinsdale, Peru P1 (CP, LMB), P3 (CP, LMB) Mercury Ashumet Pond Mashpee, Falmouth P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Atkins Reservoir Amherst, Shutesbury P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Attitash, Lake Amesbury, Merrimac P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Badluck Lake Douglas P6 Mercury Baker Pond Brewster, Orleans P1 (YP), P3 (YP) Mercury Baldpate Pond Boxford P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Ballardvale Impoundment of Shawsheen River Andover P1 (LMB & BC), P3 (LMB & BC) Mercury Bare Hill Pond Harvard P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Bearse Pond Barnstable P1 (LMB, SMB), P3 (LMB, SMB) Mercury Beaver Pond Bellingham, Milford P1 (CP, LMB), P3 (CP, LMB) Mercury Big Pond Otis P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Boon, Lake Hudson, Stow P1 (LMB & BC), P3 (LMB & BC) Mercury Box Pond Bellingham, Mendon P1 (WS), P2 (WS) DDT Bracket Reservoir (Framingham Reservoir #2) – See Sudbury River Browning Pond Oakham, Spencer P1 (LMB, YP), P3 (LMB, YP) Mercury Buckley Dunton Lake Becket P1
    [Show full text]