DOCSLIB.ORG

The Potts Model and the Symmetric Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Potts Model and the Symmetric Group 259 The Potts model and the symmetric group V. F. R. JONES Dept. of Math., University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ABSTRACT The symmetric group S k acts on a vector space V of dimension k by permuting the basis elements VJ,v2,· .. vk. The gmups 5 11 acts on ®n V by the tensor product factors. We show that the algebra of all matrices on 0nV commuting with Sk is generated by Sn and the operators e 1 and e2 where 1 k el ( VPl 0 Vp2 0 ... 0 Vp.,) = k L Vi 0 Vp2 0 ... 0 Vpn i=l The matrices e 1 and e2 give the vertical and horizontal transfer matrices adding one site in the square lattice Potts model. §0. Introduction In the Potts model ([Ba]) of classical equilibrium statistical mechanics, indi- 11 vidual "atoms" can be in one of k possible spin" states o-1 , ..• , an. Two particles interact if they are neighbours and if their spins are the same. Thus the matrix w(u, a') of Boltzmann weights is invariant under the (diagonal) action of the metric group Sk. The usual presentation of the Potts model transfer matrices in the physics literature ( eg. fBaJ) writes them as elements of an algebra gener- ated by cyclic groups so only the cyclic symmetry is apparent. This is a little misleading and one should attempt to understand the full symmetry group. This seems especially important now that there are known to be solvable models whose Boltzmann weights have rather interesting symmetry groups (see [JaJ). The first question one may ask is to what extent the transfer matrices generate the commu- tant of the group of symmetries. The actual details of this question will depend on 260 the kind of model (Spin, vertex, IRF, ... ). Although we are only really concerned with the Potts model here, let us describe the situation for a certain vertex model (solvable by Temperley Lieb equivalence- see [Ba] chap 12) to illustrate clearly the connection between this problem and classical invariant theory. A vertex model is specified by a k2 x 12 matrix b = 1, ... k, x, y = 1, ... I. In our special case we define = -/;6,z6b,y (k = 1), and R(>.) = f(>.)e + id for some conveniently chosen J(>.). The site-to-site transfer matrices are then obtained from the matrices e1, e2, .•• , en-I on ®nV, V being a vector space over a field of characteristic zero, where ei{w1 ® · · · 0 Wi ®wi+I 0 · · · ® wn) = w 1 ® · · · ® e( Wi ® Wi+l) 0 · · · ® Wn, where Wi E V for each i and e is the element of End(V 0 V) having matrix with respect to the basis {v, 0 Vz} of V 0 V, {V,} being a basis of V. (Thus e(v, 0 Vz) = 2::: e: 0 Vy.) b,y The ei 's are orthogonal projections satisfying 1 eiei±1 ei = k 2 ei eiej = ejei if li Jl 2. If V is considered to be a real Euclidean space for which {va} is an orthonormal basis, one recognizes e as being orthogonal projection onto the canonical subspace of V 0 V, scalar multiples of L Va 0 Va, which is independent of the orthonormal basis. Thus this vertex model" has as a natural symmetry group the orthogonal group O(k). The question of to what extent the site-to-site transfer matrices gen- erate the commutant of the symmetry group becomes the question of an explicit description of the commutant of the tensor powers of the vector representation of the orthogonal group. Thus question was answered in the 1930's by Brauer [Br] who showed that this commutru1t is generated as an algebra by our ei's and the natural representation of the permutation group Sn on ®n V. He gave moreover an explicit abstract algebra with basis all possible partitions of a set of 2n elements into subsets of size 2, represented by diagrams as below, X X X X X 261 and an obvious way of considering these diagrams as operators on ®nV. The ele- ment ei described above corresponds (up to a factor k) to the diagram X X X X X (\ X X X X X X X 2 i +I n For k sufficiently large (and n fixed) the matrices corresponding to diagrams are a basis of the commutant of O(k), and they always span it linearly. Thus the commutant is always a quotient of the abstract Brauer algebra. Wenzl obtained the structure of the abstract Brauer algebra for generic values of the parameter k, using ideas from subfactors, knot theory and quantum groups, in (VV]. (The interested reader might also want to consult [Jol].) Thus we see that, for this vertex model, the commutant of the symmetry group is generated by the site-to-site transfer matrices and the obvious action of the permutation group on @ 11 V. One may ask to what extent this is true in general. (For vertex models coming from quantum groups, the group symmetries would become quantum group symmetries and the group Sn would be replaced by the braid group - the result may well be true in general, through one would have to consider R(A) for all values of>..) In this paper we will show that the version of the result appropriate for spin models (i.e models of the same kind as the Potts model but with arbitrary Boltzmann weights w(a,a')) is true for the Potts model. The main differences are that @ 11 V will carry 2n matrices ei, that the parameter k2 in the ei relations becomes k, that the permutation group Sn has two orbits on the set of all ei's, and that the continuous group 0( k) of the above vertex model is replaced by the finite group sk. Before getting on with the proof of the result let us point out that the algebra structure {and thus, if desired, the dimension) of the cmpmutant of Sk is easily determined, at least inductively, from the representation: theory of Sk· For the representation on V of S1.: is a permutation representation, so tensoring by V cor- responds to restriction to the stabilizer of a point, i.e. Sk-I and then inducing back up to Sk. Since induction and restriction are particularly simply visible from the Young diagrams, one immediately obtains the Bratteli diagram for Endsk(0 71 V): (illustrated for k = 6): 262 - dimension 2 - dimension 15 - dimension 203 etc. In general for a given k the Bratteli diagram will stop growing wider after the point at which all irreducible representations of Sk appear. In this respect the Brauer algebra is different the diagram will grow ever wider since the orthogonal group has infinitely many different irreducible representations. It is still true however that the number of simple components of the Brauer algebra is larger if k is larger (for large n). I would like to thank Roger Howe for first pointing out to me the ,en matrix in the vertex model described above. §1. Two bases for Ends,(®"V) Let V be a vector space of dimension k over a field ]{ of characteristic zero, with basis {va} indexed by a set A of size k. The symmetric group Skis linearly 11 represented on V by a(va) = V 11 (a). Thus for each n, ® V is an Sk-module. As a vector space, Endsk(011 V) is just the fixed points for the representation of Sk on End( ®n V) by conjugation. But this is a permutation representation for if X E End( 0n V) has matrix with respect to the basis {Va 1 0va 2 0· · ·0Van} then a(X) has matrix Hence a basis for Endsk ( ®nV) is given by 263 where each sum is taken over all {a1, a2, ···an, b1, b2, · · · bn} in an orbit 2 orbit for the action of Sk on the 2n-fold Cartesian product A n. Each orbit for this Sk action is given by a partition of {1, 2, ... , 2n} into subsets (obviously at most k of them). If......, denotes the equivalence relation defined by such a partition then the 211 corresponding orbit on A consists of these 2n-tuples ( ah ···,an,···, a2n) (setting b; = Un+i) for which ai = Uj iff i rv j. The number of equivalence relations with r classes is the Stirling number S(2n, r) so that the dimension of Ends, ( 0" V) is k 2n LS(2n, i). For 2n S: k this is the Bell number B(2n) = L S(2n, i) (see [S) p.33). i=l i=l Compare the first few Bell numbers with the dimensions of the Bratteli diagram. If .-...- is an equivalence relation on {1, ... , 2n} we will call T ..... the element of End(V®") defined by the corresponding Sk-orbit. It clearly has the following matrix: = { 1 if (ai aj ¢> i "'j) 0 otherwise. Note that T,., is zero if the number of classes for "' is more than k. i.,From our discussion {T...... I "' an equivalence relations } is a basis for Endsk(®nV) with k L S(2n, i) elements (forgetting any T_ that may be zero). i=l In fact we will use another set which linearly spans Endsk(®nV) and will also be a basis if k 2 2n. For each as above define L_ E Ends, ( ®" V) by Where the sum is over all partitions "-' 1 coarser than ,....., . By MObius inversion ([S) p.ll6) the T_'s can be expressed in terms of the L_'s so they also span Endsk(®nV).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crystal Symmetry Groups
    X-Ray and Neutron Crystallography rational numbers is a group under Crystal Symmetry Groups multiplication, and both it and the integer group already discussed are examples of infinite groups because they each contain an infinite number of elements. ymmetry plays an important role between the integers obey the rules of In the case of a symmetry group, in crystallography. The ways in group theory: an element is the operation needed to which atoms and molecules are ● There must be defined a procedure for produce one object from another. For arrangeds within a unit cell and unit cells example, a mirror operation takes an combining two elements of the group repeat within a crystal are governed by to form a third. For the integers one object in one location and produces symmetry rules. In ordinary life our can choose the addition operation so another of the opposite hand located first perception of symmetry is what that a + b = c is the operation to be such that the mirror doing the operation is known as mirror symmetry. Our performed and u, b, and c are always is equidistant between them (Fig. 1). bodies have, to a good approximation, elements of the group. These manipulations are usually called mirror symmetry in which our right side ● There exists an element of the group, symmetry operations. They are com- is matched by our left as if a mirror called the identity element and de- bined by applying them to an object se- passed along the central axis of our noted f, that combines with any other bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Symmetry
    Molecular Symmetry 1 I. WHAT IS SYMMETRY AND WHY IT IS IMPORTANT? Some object are ”more symmetrical” than others. A sphere is more symmetrical than a cube because it looks the same after rotation through any angle about the diameter. A cube looks the same only if it is rotated through certain angels about specific axes, such as 90o, 180o, or 270o about an axis passing through the centers of any of its opposite faces, or by 120o or 240o about an axis passing through any of the opposite corners. Here are also examples of different molecules which remain the same after certain symme- try operations: NH3, H2O, C6H6, CBrClF . In general, an action which leaves the object looking the same after a transformation is called a symmetry operation. Typical symme- try operations include rotations, reflections, and inversions. There is a corresponding symmetry element for each symmetry operation, which is the point, line, or plane with respect to which the symmetry operation is performed. For instance, a rotation is carried out around an axis, a reflection is carried out in a plane, while an inversion is carried our in a point. We shall see that we can classify molecules that possess the same set of symmetry ele- ments, and grouping together molecules that possess the same set of symmetry elements. This classification is very important, because it allows to make some general conclusions about molecular properties without calculation. Particularly, we will be able to decide if a molecule has a dipole moment, or not and to know in advance the degeneracy of molecular states.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Unitary Group - Wikipedia
    Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Special unitary group In mathematics, the special unitary group of degree n, denoted SU( n), is the Lie group of n×n unitary matrices with determinant 1. (More general unitary matrices may have complex determinants with absolute value 1, rather than real 1 in the special case.) The group operation is matrix multiplication. The special unitary group is a subgroup of the unitary group U( n), consisting of all n×n unitary matrices. As a compact classical group, U( n) is the group that preserves the standard inner product on Cn.[nb 1] It is itself a subgroup of the general linear group, SU( n) ⊂ U( n) ⊂ GL( n, C). The SU( n) groups find wide application in the Standard Model of particle physics, especially SU(2) in the electroweak interaction and SU(3) in quantum chromodynamics.[1] The simplest case, SU(1) , is the trivial group, having only a single element. The group SU(2) is isomorphic to the group of quaternions of norm 1, and is thus diffeomorphic to the 3-sphere. Since unit quaternions can be used to represent rotations in 3-dimensional space (up to sign), there is a surjective homomorphism from SU(2) to the rotation group SO(3) whose kernel is {+ I, − I}. [nb 2] SU(2) is also identical to one of the symmetry groups of spinors, Spin(3), that enables a spinor presentation of rotations. Contents Properties Lie algebra Fundamental representation Adjoint representation The group SU(2) Diffeomorphism with S 3 Isomorphism with unit quaternions Lie Algebra The group SU(3) Topology Representation theory Lie algebra Lie algebra structure Generalized special unitary group Example Important subgroups See also 1 of 10 2/22/2018, 8:54 PM Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Remarks Notes References Properties The special unitary group SU( n) is a real Lie group (though not a complex Lie group).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Group and Symmetry
    Chapter 1 Group and Symmetry 1.1 Introduction 1. A group (G) is a collection of elements that can ‘multiply’ and ‘di- vide’. The ‘multiplication’ ∗ is a binary operation that is associative but not necessarily commutative. Formally, the defining properties are: (a) if g1, g2 ∈ G, then g1 ∗ g2 ∈ G; (b) there is an identity e ∈ G so that g ∗ e = e ∗ g = g for every g ∈ G. The identity e is sometimes written as 1 or 1; (c) there is a unique inverse g−1 for every g ∈ G so that g ∗ g−1 = g−1 ∗ g = e. The multiplication rules of a group can be listed in a multiplication table, in which every group element occurs once and only once in every row and every column (prove this !) . For example, the following is the multiplication table of a group with four elements named Z4. e g1 g2 g3 e e g1 g2 g3 g1 g1 g2 g3 e g2 g2 g3 e g1 g3 g3 e g1 g2 Table 2.1 Multiplication table of Z4 3 4 CHAPTER 1. GROUP AND SYMMETRY 2. Two groups with identical multiplication tables are usually considered to be the same. We also say that these two groups are isomorphic. Group elements could be familiar mathematical objects, such as numbers, matrices, and differential operators. In that case group multiplication is usually the ordinary multiplication, but it could also be ordinary addition. In the latter case the inverse of g is simply −g, the identity e is simply 0, and the group multiplication is commutative.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1305.5974V1 [Math-Ph]
    INTRODUCTION TO SPORADIC GROUPS for physicists Luis J. Boya∗ Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica Universidad de Zaragoza E-50009 Zaragoza, SPAIN MSC: 20D08, 20D05, 11F22 PACS numbers: 02.20.a, 02.20.Bb, 11.24.Yb Key words: Finite simple groups, sporadic groups, the Monster group. Juan SANCHO GUIMERA´ In Memoriam Abstract We describe the collection of finite simple groups, with a view on physical applications. We recall first the prime cyclic groups Zp, and the alternating groups Altn>4. After a quick revision of finite fields Fq, q = pf , with p prime, we consider the 16 families of finite simple groups of Lie type. There are also 26 extra “sporadic” groups, which gather in three interconnected “generations” (with 5+7+8 groups) plus the Pariah groups (6). We point out a couple of physical applications, in- cluding constructing the biggest sporadic group, the “Monster” group, with close to 1054 elements from arguments of physics, and also the relation of some Mathieu groups with compactification in string and M-theory. ∗[email protected] arXiv:1305.5974v1 [math-ph] 25 May 2013 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Generaldescriptionofthework . 3 1.2 Initialmathematics............................ 7 2 Generalities about groups 14 2.1 Elementarynotions............................ 14 2.2 Theframeworkorbox .......................... 16 2.3 Subgroups................................. 18 2.4 Morphisms ................................ 22 2.5 Extensions................................. 23 2.6 Familiesoffinitegroups ......................... 24 2.7 Abeliangroups .............................. 27 2.8 Symmetricgroup ............................. 28 3 More advanced group theory 30 3.1 Groupsoperationginspaces. 30 3.2 Representations.............................. 32 3.3 Characters.Fourierseries . 35 3.4 Homological algebra and extension theory . 37 3.5 Groupsuptoorder16..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetry, Automorphisms, and Self-Duality of Infinite Planar Graphs and Tilings
    SYMMETRY, AUTOMORPHISMS, AND SELF-DUALITY OF INFINITE PLANAR GRAPHS AND TILINGS BRIGITTE AND HERMAN SERVATIUS Abstract. We consider tilings of the plane whose graphs are locally finite and 3-connected. We show that if the automorphism group of the graph has finitely many orbits, then there is an isomorphic tiling in either the Euclidean or hyperbolic plane such that the group of automorphisms acts as a group of isometries. We apply this fact to the classification of self-dual doubly periodic tilings via Coxeter’s 2-color groups. 1. Definitions By a tiling, T = (G, p) we mean a tame embedding p of an infinite, locally finite three–connected graph G into the plane whose geometric dual G∗ is also locally finite (and necessarily three-connected.) We say an embedding of a graph is tame if it is piecewise linear and the image of the set of vertices has no accumulation points. Each such tiling realizes the plane as a regular CW–complex whose vertices, edges and faces we will refer to indiscriminately as cells. It can be shown [9] that all such graphs can be embedded so that the edges are straight lines and the faces are convex, however we make no such requirements. The boundary ∂X of a subcomplex X is the set of all cells which belong both to a cell contained in X as well as a cell not contained in X. Given a CW-complex X, the barycentric subdivision of X, B(X), is the simplicial complex induced by the flags of X, however it is sufficient for our purposes to form B(X) adding one new vertex to the interior of every edge and face and joining them as in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups and Symmetries
    Groups and Symmetries F. Oggier & A. M. Bruckstein Division of Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2 These notes were designed to fit the syllabus of the course “Groups and Symmetries”, taught at Nanyang Technological University in autumn 2012, and 2013. Many thanks to Dr. Nadya Markin and Fuchun Lin for reading these notes, finding things to be fixed, proposing improvements and extra exercises. Many thanks as well to Yiwei Huang who got the thankless job of providing a first latex version of these notes. These notes went through several stages: handwritten lecture notes (later on typed by Yiwei), slides, and finally the current version that incorporates both slides and a cleaned version of the lecture notes. Though the current version should be pretty stable, it might still contain (hopefully rare) typos and inaccuracies. Relevant references for this class are the notes of K. Conrad on planar isometries [3, 4], the books by D. Farmer [5] and M. Armstrong [2] on groups and symmetries, the book by J. Gallian [6] on abstract algebra. More on solitaire games and palindromes may be found respectively in [1] and [7]. The images used were properly referenced in the slides given to the stu- dents, though not all the references are appearing here. These images were used uniquely for pedagogical purposes. Contents 1 Isometries of the Plane 5 2 Symmetries of Shapes 25 3 Introducing Groups 41 4 The Group Zoo 69 5 More Group Structures 93 6 Back to Geometry 123 7 Permutation Groups 147 8 Cayley Theorem and Puzzles 171 9 Quotient Groups 191 10 Infinite Groups 211 11 Frieze Groups 229 12 Revision Exercises 253 13 Solutions to the Exercises 255 3 4 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Isometries of the Plane “For geometry, you know, is the gate of science, and the gate is so low and small that one can only enter it as a little child.” (W.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetry Groups
    Symmetry Groups Symmetry plays an essential role in particle theory. If a theory is invariant under transformations by a symmetry group one obtains a conservation law and quantum numbers. For example, invariance under rotation in space leads to angular momentum conservation and to the quantum numbers j, mj for the total angular momentum. Gauge symmetries: These are local symmetries that act differently at each space-time point xµ = (t,x) . They create particularly stringent constraints on the structure of a theory. For example, gauge symmetry automatically determines the interaction between particles by introducing bosons that mediate the interaction. All current models of elementary particles incorporate gauge symmetry. (Details on p. 4) Groups: A group G consists of elements a , inverse elements a−1, a unit element 1, and a multiplication rule “ ⋅ ” with the properties: 1. If a,b are in G, then c = a ⋅ b is in G. 2. a ⋅ (b ⋅ c) = (a ⋅ b) ⋅ c 3. a ⋅ 1 = 1 ⋅ a = a 4. a ⋅ a−1 = a−1 ⋅ a = 1 The group is called Abelian if it obeys the additional commutation law: 5. a ⋅ b = b ⋅ a Product of Groups: The product group G×H of two groups G, H is defined by pairs of elements with the multiplication rule (g1,h1) ⋅ (g2,h2) = (g1 ⋅ g2 , h1 ⋅ h2) . A group is called simple if it cannot be decomposed into a product of two other groups. (Compare a prime number as analog.) If a group is not simple, consider the factor groups. Examples: n×n matrices of complex numbers with matrix multiplication.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetry in 2D
    Symmetry in 2D 4/24/2013 L. Viciu| AC II | Symmetry in 2D 1 Outlook • Symmetry: definitions, unit cell choice • Symmetry operations in 2D • Symmetry combinations • Plane Point groups • Plane (space) groups • Finding the plane group: examples 4/24/2013 L. Viciu| AC II | Symmetry in 2D 2 Symmetry Symmetry is the preservation of form and configuration across a point, a line, or a plane. The techniques that are used to "take a shape and match it exactly to another” are called transformations Inorganic crystals usually have the shape which reflects their internal symmetry 4/24/2013 L. Viciu| AC II | Symmetry in 2D 3 Lattice = an array of points repeating periodically in space (2D or 3D). Motif/Basis = the repeating unit of a pattern (ex. an atom, a group of atoms, a molecule etc.) Unit cell = The smallest repetitive volume of the crystal, which when stacked together with replication reproduces the whole crystal 4/24/2013 L. Viciu| AC II | Symmetry in 2D 4 Unit cell convention By convention the unit cell is chosen so that it is as small as possible while reflecting the full symmetry of the lattice (b) to (e) correct unit cell: choice of origin is arbitrary but the cells should be identical; (f) incorrect unit cell: not permissible to isolate unit cells from each other (1 and 2 are not identical)4/24/2013 L. Viciu| AC II | Symmetry in 2D 5 A. West: Solid state chemistry and its applications Some Definitions • Symmetry element: An imaginary geometric entity (line, point, plane) about which a symmetry operation takes place • Symmetry Operation: a permutation of atoms such that an object (molecule or crystal) is transformed into a state indistinguishable from the starting state • Invariant point: point that maps onto itself • Asymmetric unit: The minimum unit from which the structure can be generated by symmetry operations 4/24/2013 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of SU(N)
    University of Rochester Group Theory for Physicists Professor Sarada Rajeev Characterization of SU(N) David Mayrhofer PHY 391 Independent Study Paper December 13th, 2019 1 Introduction At this point in the course, we have discussed SO(N) in detail. We have de- termined the Lie algebra associated with this group, various properties of the various reducible and irreducible representations, and dealt with the specific cases of SO(2) and SO(3). Now, we work to do the same for SU(N). We de- termine how to use tensors to create different representations for SU(N), what difficulties arise when moving from SO(N) to SU(N), and then delve into a few specific examples of useful representations. 2 Review of Orthogonal and Unitary Matrices 2.1 Orthogonal Matrices When initially working with orthogonal matrices, we defined a matrix O as orthogonal by the following relation OT O = 1 (1) This was done to ensure that the length of vectors would be preserved after a transformation. This can be seen by v ! v0 = Ov =) (v0)2 = (v0)T v0 = vT OT Ov = v2 (2) In this scenario, matrices then must transform as A ! A0 = OAOT , as then we will have (Av)2 ! (A0v0)2 = (OAOT Ov)2 = (OAOT Ov)T (OAOT Ov) (3) = vT OT OAT OT OAOT Ov = vT AT Av = (Av)2 Therefore, when moving to unitary matrices, we want to ensure similar condi- tions are met. 2.2 Unitary Matrices When working with quantum systems, we not longer can restrict ourselves to purely real numbers. Quite frequently, it is necessarily to extend the field we are with with to the complex numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetry in Network Coding
    Symmetry in Network Coding Jayant Apte, John MacLaren Walsh Drexel University, Dept. of ECE, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—We establish connections between graph theoretic will associate a subgroup of Sn (group of all permutations symmetry, symmetries of network codes, and symmetries of rate of n symbols) called the network symmetry group (NSG) that regions for k-unicast network coding and multi-source network contains information about the symmetries of that instance. §II coding. We identify a group we call the network symmetry group as the common thread between these notions of symmetry is devoted to the preliminaries and the definition of NSG. The and characterize it as a subgroup of the automorphism group connections between NSGs and symmetries of network codes of a directed cyclic graph appropriately constructed from the and rate regions are discussed in §III. Secondly, we provide underlying network’s directed acyclic graph. Such a charac- means to compute this group given an instance of a multi- terization allows one to obtain the network symmetry group source network coding problem. This is achieved through a using algorithms for computing automorphism groups of graphs. We discuss connections to generalizations of Chen and Yeung’s graph theoretic characterization of the NSG, specifically, as a partition symmetrical entropy functions and how knowledge of subgroup of automorphism group of a directed cyclic graph the network symmetry group can be utilized to reduce the called the dual circulation graph that we construct from the complexity of computing the LP outer bounds on network coding directed acyclic graph underlying the MSNC instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorems and Definitions in Group Theory
    Theorems and Definitions in Group Theory Shunan Zhao Contents 1 Basics of a group 3 1.1 Basic Properties of Groups . 3 1.2 Properties of Inverses . 3 1.3 Direct Product of Groups . 4 2 Equivalence Relations and Disjoint Partitions 4 3 Elementary Number Theory 5 3.1 GCD and LCM . 5 3.2 Primes and Euclid's Lemma . 5 4 Exponents and Order 6 4.1 Exponents . 6 4.2 Order . 6 5 Integers Modulo n 7 5.1 Integers Modulo n .............................. 7 5.2 Addition and Multiplication of Zn ...................... 7 6 Subgroups 7 6.1 Properties of Subgroups . 7 6.2 Subgroups of Z ................................ 8 6.3 Special Subgroups of a Group G ....................... 8 6.4 Creating New Subgroups from Given Ones . 8 7 Cyclic Groups and Their Subgroups 9 7.1 Cyclic Subgroups of a Group . 9 7.2 Cyclic Groups . 9 7.3 Subgroups of Cyclic Groups . 9 7.4 Direct Product of Cyclic Groups . 10 8 Subgroups Generated by a Subset of a Group G 10 9 Symmetry Groups and Permutation Groups 10 9.1 Bijections . 10 9.2 Permutation Groups . 11 9.3 Cycles . 11 9.4 Orbits of a Permutation . 12 9.5 Generators of Sn ............................... 12 1 10 Homorphisms 13 10.1 Homomorphisms, Epimorphisms, and Monomorphisms . 13 10.2 Classification Theorems . 14 11 Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem 15 11.1 Cosets . 15 11.2 Lagrange's Theorem . 15 12 Normal Subgroups 16 12.1 Introduction to Normal Subgroups . 16 12.2 Quotient Groups . 16 13 Product Isomorphism Theorem and Isomorphism Theorems 17 13.1 Product Isomorphism Theorem .
    [Show full text]