DOCSLIB.ORG

Anthropologists Unite! Anthropology Isn’T in the Crisis That Parts of the Media Would Have You Believe, but It Must Do Better, Argue Adam Kuper and Jonathan Marks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anthropologists Unite! Anthropology Isn’T in the Crisis That Parts of the Media Would Have You Believe, but It Must Do Better, Argue Adam Kuper and Jonathan Marks COMMENT Anthropologists unite! Anthropology isn’t in the crisis that parts of the media would have you believe, but it must do better, argue Adam Kuper and Jonathan Marks. n December 2010, The New York Times which seems to translate into antiscience.” anthropologists cannot agree on what the NS I reported1,2 that the term ‘science’ had The new long-range plan also provoked discipline is about. Many, probably most, PARK been dropped in a new long-range plan rumblings of discontent (still ongoing) in the anthropologists have walked away from their ID Iof the American Anthropological Associa- blogosphere, and the association’s executive traditional mission, which is to build a truly tion (AAA). Where once the association had committee scrambled somewhat belatedly to comparative science of human variation. We ONS BY DAV BY ONS dedicated itself “to advance anthropology as reassure the public — and its own members need to work out where we are now heading. I the science that studies humankind in all its — that it had all been a misunderstanding. aspects”, it now promised rather “to advance They had not intended to cast doubt on the ROOTS AND BRANCHES public understanding of humankind in all scientific character of the discipline. And in The reason that the AAA got into such a ILLUSTRAT its aspects”. fact the same committee had come up with a pickle is that — like geography, even perhaps The reporter suggested that this brought simultaneous text entitled ‘What is Anthro- like biology — anthropology is a nineteenth- to a head an epic struggle in the discipline pology?’, which describes anthropology century discipline that fragmented, spawn- between the true scientists and their foes. unambiguously as a science. ing a variety of specializations. Biological Frank Marlowe, president-elect of the Evo- Apparently, a committee had floundered in anthropology, archaeology and the vari- lutionary Anthropology Society (a branch trying to come up with an agenda for anthro- ous traditions of ethnography are bundled of the AAA that is curiously independent of pology that was baggy enough to accommo- together in many university departments its long-standing Biological Anthropology date its very various research programmes. Is and professional associations such as the Section), was quoted as saying: “we evolu- this news? Indeed it is, but not, as the bloggers AAA and, in Britain, the Royal Anthropo- tionary anthropologists are outnumbered by and The New York Times suggest, because an logical Institute. However, relationships are the new cultural or social anthropologists, anti-science conspiracy has hijacked Ameri- often distant. The biologists do genetics, or many but not all of whom are postmodern, can anthropology. The real shocker is that neuroscience, or primatology, or chase up 166 | NATURE | VOL 470 | 10 FEBRUARY 2011 © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved COMMENT new developments in evolutionary theory. Geertz followed that road down to a relativist faculties of science or medicine. Cultural They show little interest in archaeology dead end. All generalizations about human anthropologists allied themselves with the — except perhaps the archaeology of very beings were suspect, except for the iron law humanities. Archaeologists sought shel- ancient humans — or in ethnography, that culture trumps biology3. ter where they could. In Europe the main except for snippets of information about The controversies of the 1980s, which branches of anthropology had gone their sex and violence. Some do seem to feel lingered on into the 1990s, often hinged on own ways after the Second World War. It now that if only they could spare the time they claims about race, sex and violence, and so seemed as though the Americans were belat- would be able to knock some evolutionist they caught the attention of a wider public. edly following the same route. However, in the sense into cultural anthropology. But they In a popular book published in 1928, Mar- new millennium, the brief and localized trend are too busy. garet Mead had reported that Samoan girls reversed itself. This is because there is a stu- Meanwhile, the ethnographers agree that enjoyed sexual freedom, and so experienced dent demand for the whole package, the study their first task is to document the great diver- an untroubled passage through adoles- of human origins, history and diversity. sity of human ways of life. Generalizations cence4. More than half a century later (and Today, anthropologists may teach more or about human nature should not be based after Mead’s death), Derek Freeman trashed less happily in interdisciplinary teams, but on a single report of Amazonian violence, her account, insisting that the girls were they seldom collaborate in research projects or Tibetan polyandry, or woman–woman remarkably chaste5. Rather mysteriously, the that breach their disciplinary specialities. marriage among the Lovedu of South Africa. sex life of Samoan girls became a popular In the past few years But they do not agree on how to make sense test-case for the nature–nurture argument. they have drifted to of the customs of faraway peoples. Social (Recent commentaries are kinder to Mead “There a sadder-but-wiser anthropologists engage with models and than to Freeman, although it has become is a need default position, some theories current in the social sciences obvious that neither Freeman nor Mead can for a truly documenting the (ideally, although they seldom keep up as be relied on uncritically for the description comparative range of differences well as they should). Some cultural anthro- of Samoan adolescence, let alone for the science of in human biology, pologists aim rather to understand and explanation6.) human beings others studying the translate, and they look for inspiration to Young women might find happiness in a throughout world of social insti- literary theorists and philosophers (prefer- liberated sex life, but were young men given their history, tutions and belief sys- ably French, even if they have to be read in rather to violence? Napoleon Chagnon and all over tems. Only a handful often impenetrable translations). claimed that among the Yanomami of the the world.” still try to understand For a long time the main branches of Amazon, the most violent men got the girls. the origins and pos- anthropology largely ignored one another, (And he suggested that, in something like a sible connections but in the 1980s two radical movements state of nature, all men are Yanomami under between biological, social and cultural provoked a confrontation. Sociobiologists the skin7.) His account of these people was forms, or to debate the relative significance claimed that genetics was about to revolu- challenged by other ethnographers, who of history and microevolution in specific, tionize the human sciences. These would reported significant local variation even well-documented instances. become at last a branch of biology, although among the 22,500-strong Yanomami, not This is a great pity, and not only because the great biologist Ernst Mayr did warn that least in rates of homicide and the abduction the silence of the anthropologists has left the “the profound differences in social behaviour of women8. In any case, the Yanomami are field to blockbusting books by amateurs that among human groups, some of them closely not typical even of the most isolated, small- are long on speculation and short on reliable related, show how much of this behaviour is scale, technologically limited societies. Many information. Anthropologists hardly bother cultural rather than genetic”. Sociobiologists ethnographies document easy-going gender any longer to take issue with even the most also drew on ethology, relationships between hunter-gatherers, outlandish generalizations about human an older movement “The real from Alaska to the Kalahari Desert, or offer nature. Not their business. that made much of shocker is that historical accounts of peace-loving Indian parallels between anthropologists chiefs with many wives, presiding over a BETTER TOGETHER human and primate cannot agree monastic soldiery. To be sure, it is not easy to make general — or even insect — what the Race was altogether a more serious matter, statements about human nature, or even to behaviour, provoking discipline but on this the anthropologists were not fun- define it. One obstacle is the often-taken-for- Sherwood Washburn, is about.” damentally divided. The 1994 publication by granted opposition between the notoriously a leading biological psychologist Richard J. Herrnstein and politi- — perhaps necessarily — unstable ideas of anthropologist, to cal scientist Charles Murray of their book The ‘nature’ and ‘culture’. The human species has comment that human ethology “might be Bell Curve9 provoked a national debate about been co-evolving with technology for mil- defined as the science that pretends humans race and inequality. The AAA and the Ameri- lions of years. Advances in contraceptive cannot speak”. can Association of Physical Anthropologists techniques have transformed our sexual Inspired by the elegant essays of Clifford issued parallel statements summarizing the behaviour. The most fundamentally hard- Geertz, another new movement appeared scientific understanding on race. In brief, they wired human adaptations — walking and centre-stage in the 1980s (in fact another agreed that human variation is structured bio- talking — are actively learned by every per- very old movement, in modern dress). culturally, clinally and locally.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae January 2019
    Curriculum Vitae January 2019 Jane E. Buikstra Arizona State University, School of Human Evolution and Social Change Rm 233, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402 Phone: 480-965-6931 • Fax: 480-965-7671 • [email protected] EDUCATION DePauw University, B.A. (Anthropology) 1967 University of Chicago, M.A. (Anthropology) 1969 University of Chicago, Ph.D. (Anthropology) 1972 HONORS AND AWARDS: McMahan Scholar, Alpha Lambda Delta, 1963-1967 DePauw University Phi Beta Kappa, DePauw University 1967 National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship 1967-1970 Student Advisory Board, Teaching Award, 1981 Northwestern University National Academy of Sciences, elected 1987 Gerrit Heinrich Kroon Memorial Lecture, University of Amsterdam 1988 Harold H. Swift, Distinguished Service Professor 1989-1995 University of Chicago National Association of Student Anthropologists, AAA, 1991 Service Award Sherwood Washburn Memorial Lecture, University of 1993 California, Berkeley, Department of Anthropology Distinguished Professor of Anthropology 1995-2000 University of New Mexico (UNM) Loren Eiseley Society Lecturer, University of Pennsylvania 1997, 2018 Museum of Anthropology Leslie Spier Distinguished Professor of Anthropology 2001-2005 University of New Mexico UNM General Library Award for Research Achievement 2002 George E. Burch Fellow in Theoretic Medicine and 2003-2007 Affiliated Sciences at the Smithsonian Institution Annual Research Lecturer, University of New Mexico 2003 Pomerance Award for Scientific Contributions to Archaeology, Archaeological Institute of America 2005
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Sherwood Washburn
    UC Berkeley Anthropology Faculty Publications Title An Interview with Sherwood Washburn Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xp1w64r Journal Current Anthropology, 33(4) Authors Washburn, Sherwood L. Devore, Irven Publication Date 1992 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Reports An Interview with much more fun. In retrospect, I think that my family was amazingly generous in what they allowed me to do. Sherwood Washburn' The first skeleton I had anything to do with was a porcupine skeleton which my brother and I found in the Catskill Mountains. It had dried out and become just IRVEN DEVORE bones and a few quills. We gave it to the Harvard Mu­ Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A. t5 II 86 seum of Comparative Zoology. Dr. Henshaw was the director at the time. In retrospect, I believe my father 10: We thought we might start with your precollege must have called him before we arrived, because when years, and I urge you to go back to as early a period as we came in with this absolutely wretched bunch of bro­ you want to. ken porcupine bones, he welcomed us as if we were giv­ ing Harvard a great, valuable specimen. He treated us SW: Of course/ I was always interested in zoology­ like adults even though my brother and I were respec­ mammal skeletOns, birds, and behavior. I kept a great tively about eight and six at the time. This experience horned owl for some years when I was young, as well as of respect from an admired adult was very important crows and hawks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead: a Cautionary Tale
    The “Fateful Hoaxing” of Margaret Mead: A Cautionary Tale Author(s): Paul Shankman Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, No. 1 (February 2013), pp. 51-70 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669033 . Accessed: 03/04/2013 14:08 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.138.170.182 on Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:08:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Current Anthropology Volume 54, Number 1, February 2013 51 The “Fateful Hoaxing” of Margaret Mead A Cautionary Tale by Paul Shankman CAϩ Online-Only Material: Supplements A and B In the Mead-Freeman controversy, Derek Freeman’s historical reconstruction of the alleged hoaxing of Margaret Mead in 1926 relied on three interviews with Fa’apua’a Fa’amu¯, Mead’s “principal informant,” who stated that she and another Samoan woman had innocently joked with Mead about their private lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Cme Reviewarticle
    Volume 62, Number 11 OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY Copyright © 2007 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins CME REVIEWARTICLE 32 CHIEF EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is part of a series of continuing education activities in this Journal through which a total of 36 AMA/PRA Category 1 CreditsTM can be earned in 2007. Instructions for how CME credits can be earned appear on the last page of the Table of Contents. The Evolutionary Origins of Obstructed Labor: Bipedalism, Encephalization, and the Human Obstetric Dilemma Anna Blackburn Wittman, MA,* and L. Lewis Wall, MD, DPhil†‡ *Doctoral Student in Anthropology, †Professor, Department of Anthropology; and ‡Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Obstructed labor is a common complication of human childbirth. In parts of the world where access to emergency obstetric services is limited, obstructed labor is a major cause of maternal mortality. Women who survive the ordeal of prolonged obstructed labor often end up suffering from an obstetric vesicovaginal fistula or another serious birth injury that leaves them crippled for life. Compared with the other higher primates (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans), these problems are uniquely human. This article reviews the evolutionary origins of the human obstetric dilemma with special reference to the changes imposed on pelvic architecture by the assumption of upright, bipedal posture and locomotion. The subsequent development of progressively increas- ing brain size (encephalization) in hominins led to the present human obstetrical conundrum: how to balance the evolutionary advantage of bigger babies with larger brains against the presence of a narrow pelvis that is difficult for a fetus to traverse during labor.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 29, Issue 2
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 29 Issue 2 December 2002 Article 1 January 2002 Volume 29, Issue 2 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation (2002) "Volume 29, Issue 2," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 29 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol29/iss2/1 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol29/iss2/1 For more information, please contact [email protected]. H istory of A' nthropology N ewsletter XXIX:2 2002 History of Anthropology Newsletter VOLUME XXIX, NUMBER 2 DECEMBER 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS CLIO'S FANCY: DOCUMENTS TO PIQUE THE IDSTORICAL IMAGINATION British Colonialists, Ibo Traders. and Idoma Democrats: A Marxist Anthropologist Enters "The Field" in Nigeria, 1950-51 ..•.•... 3 SOURCES FOR THE IDSTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY .....•.....•..•.....12 RESEARCH IN PROGRESS ..•••.•.•..•...••.•.•...•..•....•....•..... 12 BI6LIOGRAPIDCA ARCANA L American Anthropologist Special Centennial Issue . • . 13 ll. Recent Dissertations .......................................... 13 IlL Recent Work by Subscribers .•••....•..........•..••......•.. 13 ill. Suggested by Our Readers .••..•••........••.•.• o ••••• o ••••••• 15 The Editorial Committee Robert Bieder Regna Darnell Indiana University University of Western Ontario Curtis Hinsley Dell Hymes Northern Arizona University University of Virginia George W. Stocking William Sturtevant University of Chicago Smithsonian Institution Subscription rates (Each volume contains two numbers: June and December) Individual subscribers (North America) $6.00 Student subscribers 4.00 Institutional subscribers 8.00 Subscribers outside North America 8.00 Checks for renewals, new subscriptions or back numbers should be made payable (in United States dollars only) to: History of Anthropology Newsletter (or to HAN).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mead–Freeman Controversy Continues
    POSXXX10.1177/0048393117753067Philosophy of the Social SciencesShankman 753067research-article2018 Discussion Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2018, Vol. 48(3) 309 –332 The Mead–Freeman © The Author(s) 2018 Reprints and permissions: Controversy Continues: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393117753067DOI: 10.1177/0048393117753067 A Reply to Ian Jarvie journals.sagepub.com/home/pos Paul Shankman1 Abstract In the Mead–Freeman controversy, Ian Jarvie has supported much of Derek Freeman’s critique of Margaret Mead’s Coming of Age in Samoa, arguing that Samoan society was sexually repressive rather than sexually permissive, that Mead was “hoaxed” about Samoan sexual conduct, that Mead was an “absolute” cultural determinist, that Samoa was a definitive case refuting Mead’s “absolute” cultural determinism, that Mead’s book changed the direction of cultural anthropology, and that Freeman’s personal conduct during the controversy was thoroughly professional. This article calls into question these empirical and theoretical arguments, often using Freeman’s own field research and publications. Keywords Mead, Freeman, culture, biology, anthropology 1. Introduction I would like to thank Ian Jarvie (2012) for providing an opportunity to clarify some of the important issues in the Mead–Freeman controversy, now in its fourth decade. Jarvie’s article-length review of my book, The Trashing of Margaret Mead: Anatomy of an Anthropological Controversy (Shankman Received 29 November 2017 1University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA Corresponding Author: Paul Shankman, University of Colorado Boulder, 233 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0233, USA. Email: [email protected] 310 Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48(3) 2009), raises issues that have been present throughout the controversy but deserve further explication.
    [Show full text]
  • Why a Public Anthropology? Notes and References
    WHY A PUBLIC ANTHROPOLOGY? NOTES AND REFERENCES While the placement of notes and references online is still relatively rare, they are quite easy to examine in a PDF online format. Readers should use find (or control F) with a fragment of the quote to discover the cited reference. In a number of cases, I have added additional material so advanced readers, if they wish, can explore the issue in greater depth. Find can also be used to track down relevant citations, explore a topic of interest, or locate a particular section (e.g. Chapter 2 or 3.4). May I make a request? Since this Notes and References section contains over 1,300 references, it is likely that, despite my best efforts, there are still incomplete references and errors. I would appreciate readers pointing them out to me, especially since I can, in most cases, readily correct them. Thank you. Readers can email me at [email protected]. Quotes from Jim Yong Kim: On Leadership , Washington Post (April 1, 2010, listed as March 31, 2010) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/video/2010/03/31/VI2010033100606.html?hpid=smartliving CHAPTER 1 1.1 Bronislaw Malinowski, a prominent early twentieth century anthropologist, famously stated his goal in anthropology was "to grasp the native's point of view, his relation to life, to realize his vision of his world" (1961 [1922]:25) To do this, he lived as a participant-observer for roughly two years – between 1915-1918 – among the Trobriand Islanders of Papua New Guinea (in the South Pacific). Quoting him (1961[1922]:7-8): There is all the difference between a sporadic plunging into the company of natives, and being really in contact with them.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Anthropology?
    Chapter 1 What Is Anthropology? nthropology is the scientific study of the origin, the behaviour, and the A physical, social, and cultural development of humans. Anthropologists seek to understand what makes us human by studying human ancestors through archaeological excavation and by observing living cultures throughout the world. In this chapter, you will learn about different fields of anthropology and the major schools of thought, important theories, perspectives, and research within anthropology, as well as the work of influential anthropologists. You’ll also learn methods for conducting anthropological research and learn how to formulate your own research questions and record information. Chapter Expectations By the end of this chapter, you will: • summarize and compare major theories, perspectives, and research methods in anthropology • identify the significant contributions of influential anthropologists • outline the key ideas of the major anthropological schools of thought, and explain how they can be used to analyze features of cultural systems Fields of Anthropology • explain significant issues in different areas of anthropology Primatology Dian Fossey (1932–1985) • explain the main research methods for conducting anthropological Physical Anthropology Archaeology Cultural Anthropology research Biruté Galdikas (1946–) Jane Goodall (1934–) Sue Savage-Rumbaugh (1946–) Archaeology Forensic Human Variation Ethnology Linguistic Anthropology Key Terms Prehistoric Anthropology Charles Darwin Ruth Benedict (1887–1948) Noam Chomsky
    [Show full text]
  • The Iban Dairies of Monica Freeman 1949-1951. Including Ethnographical Drawings, Sketches, Paintings, Photographs and Letters, Laura P
    Moussons Recherche en sciences humaines sur l’Asie du Sud-Est 17 | 2011 Les frontières « mouvantes » de Birmanie The Iban Dairies of Monica Freeman 1949-1951. Including Ethnographical Drawings, Sketches, Paintings, Photographs and Letters, Laura P. Appell- Warren (ed.) Philipps: Borneo Research Council, monographs series n° 11, 2009, XLII + 643 p., glossary, appendix, biblio-graphy, illustrations (maps, figures and color plates) Antonio Guerreiro Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/moussons/642 ISSN: 2262-8363 Publisher Presses Universitaires de Provence Printed version Date of publication: 1 September 2011 Number of pages: 178-180 ISBN: 978-2-85399-790-4 ISSN: 1620-3224 Electronic reference Antonio Guerreiro, « The Iban Dairies of Monica Freeman 1949-1951. Including Ethnographical Drawings, Sketches, Paintings, Photographs and Letters, Laura P. Appell-Warren (ed.) », Moussons [Online], 17 | 2011, Online since 25 September 2012, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/moussons/642 Les contenus de la revue Moussons sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. 178 Comptes rendus / Reviews The Iban Dairies of Monica Freeman under Leach’s supervision at Cambridge’s 1949-1951. Including ethnographical University Department of Anthropology2. drawings, sketches, paintings, pho- While in the field, at the end of 1949, tographs and letters, Laura P. Appell- Derek Freeman decided to concentrate on his Warren (ed.), Philipps: Borneo Research ethnographical and ethnogical notes while Council, monographs series n° 11, 2009, Monica was to write the ieldwork’s dairies. XLII + 643 p., glossary, appendix, biblio- Although she had no formal training in art, she made beautiful and very detailed ethno- graphy, illustrations (maps, figures and graphic drawings, sketches and paintings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wenner-Gren Foundation
    Curren t VOLUME 57 SUPPLEMENT 14 OCTOBER 2016 Anthropolog Current Anthropology y The Wenner-Gren Foundation SUPPORTING ANTHROPOLOGY FOR 75 YEARS 1941−2016 October 2016 GUEST EDITORS: LESLIE C. AIELLO, LAURIE OBBINK, AND MARK MAHONEY LESLIE C. AIELLO e Wenner-Gren Foundation: Supporting Anthropology for 75 Years SUSAN LINDEE and JOANNA RADIN V Patrons of the Human Experience: A History of the Wenner-Gren Foundation for olume 57 Anthropological Research, 1941–2016 ILJA A. LUCIAK Vision and Reality: Axel Wenner-Gren, Paul Fejos, and the Origins of the Wenner-Gren 2016 is the 75th anniversary of the Foundation for Anthropological Research Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Supplement Research. e papers in this supplementary issue of Current Anthropology provide the 14 rst comprehensive history of the foundation and its role in the development of the eld Page s of anthropology. S211 Current Anthropology is sponsored by e Wenner- − S332 Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, a AXEL WENNER-GREN PAUL FEJOS LITA OSMUNDSEN foundation endowed for scientic, educational, and charitable purposes. e Foundation, however, is not to be understood as endorsing, by virtue of its Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research nancial support, any of the statements made, or views expressed, herein. THE UNIVERSIT Y O F CHICAGO PRESS The Wenner-Gren Foundation Supporting Anthropology for 75 Years, 1941–2016 Guest Editors: Leslie C. Aiello, Laurie Obbink, and Mark Mahoney Wenner-Gren Symposium Series Editor: Leslie Aiello
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Contemporary Evolutionary Theory in Biological Anthropology
    Cuicuilco ISSN: 1405-7778 [email protected] Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia México Fuentes, Agustín Contemporary Evolutionary Theory in Biological Anthropology: Insight into Human Evolution, Genomics and Challenges to Racialized Pseudo-Science Cuicuilco, vol. 23, núm. 65, enero-abril, 2016, pp. 293-304 Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35145329015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Contemporary Evolutionary Theory in Biological Anthropology: Insight into Human Evolution, Genomics and Challenges to Racialized Pseudo-Science Agustín Fuentes Departamento de Antropología Universidad de Notre Dame In a 2010 article, I suggested that our discipline has moved beyond the label of “physical” anthropology, and asked the question “are we Biological Anthropologists yet?” as the starting point. I answered in the affirmative, stating that: “I sincerely believe we are Biological Anthropologists, and there is a great diversity of fantastic multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary work within our practice. As Sherwood Washburn called on us to do nearly 60 years ago, we must foster and enhance these activities and perspectives inside and outside of our association and discipline. Looking forward, we need more than ever to continue heeding the advice of Washburn and to build on the strengths and advances made in the recent history of our science” [Fuentes 2010]. Today, biological anthropologists find ourselves in the midst of multi- disciplinary and interdisciplinary work that has created a revolution in evolutionary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Fa'afafine and Whakawahine
    A comparative study of the fa’afafine of Samoa and the whakawahine of Aotearoa/New Zealand by Ashleigh McFall A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by thesis in Gender and Women’s Studies Victoria University of Wellington 2013 ii Abstract This study explores the meaning of the fa’afafine of Samoa and the whakawahine of Aotearoa/New Zealand. I compare and contrast the experiences of six fa’afafine and four whakawahine. I also examine the historical evidence for the existence of fa’afafine in Samoa and whakawahine in Aotearoa/New Zealand. The theoretical approaches underlying this research incorporate feminist, indigenous, and queer aspects but oral history is the primary theory and method used. As a fa’afafine who researched her own identity and whakawahine, the complexities of insider and outsider are explored. This thesis discusses how narrators understand and/or make meaning of western categories of identification such as gay, transgender, drag queen and/or transsexual. These categories are largely rejected; preference for the culturally specific terms fa’afafine (Samoan) and whakawahine (Maori) are demonstrated. Narrators take issue with western researchers’ focus on sexual aspects of fa’afafine and whakawahine. For them, gender role, specifically feminine dress, behaviour and activities more accurately characterise their identities. This thesis argues that fa’afafine and whakawahine are fluid identities. How one behaves as a woman varies, but narrators insist that fa’afafine and whakawahine are born not made that way, and ‘feel’ like women. The meaning of fa’afafine and whakawahine is not static; westernisation, colonization and the availability of gender reassignment treatment have all impacted on how each narrator defines her identity.
    [Show full text]