ENSEMBLE 2 Study Protocol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ENSEMBLE 2 Study Protocol Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.* Clinical Protocol Protocol Title A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ad26.COV2.S for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2-mediated COVID-19 in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older ENSEMBLE 2 Protocol VAC31518COV3009; Phase 3 AMENDMENT 3 VAC31518 (JNJ-78436735) * Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. is a Janssen pharmaceutical company of Johnson & Johnson and is hereafter referred to as the sponsor of the study. The sponsor is identified on the Contact Information page that accompanies the protocol. United States (US) sites of this study will be conducted under US Food & Drug Administration Investigational New Drug (IND) regulations (21 CFR Part 312). Regulatory Agency Identifier Number: IND: 22657 EudraCT: 2020-003643-29 Status: Approved Date: 18 December 2020 EDMS number: EDMS-RIM-96655, 4.0 GCP Compliance: This study will be conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice, and applicable regulatory requirements. Confidentiality Statement The information provided herein contains Company trade secrets, commercial or financial information that the Company customarily holds close and treats as confidential. The information is being provided under the assurance that the recipient will maintain the confidentiality of the information under applicable statutes, regulations, rules, protective orders or otherwise. CONFIDENTIAL – FOIA Exemptions Apply in U.S. 1 Status: Approved, Date: 18 December 2020 VAC31518 (JNJ-78436735) Clinical Protocol VAC31518COV3009 Amendment 3 PROTOCOL AMENDMENT SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE DOCUMENT HISTORY Document Date Amendment 3 This document Amendment 2 27 November 2020 Amendment 1 25 September 2020 Original Protocol 22 August 2020 Amendment 3 (This document) Overall Rationale for the Amendment: The main purpose of this amendment is to outline the procedures to be followed in the event that an investigator receives a request to unblind study participants who may become eligible to receive an authorized/licensed COVID-19 vaccine if/when these become available. The purpose is to ensure (1) that the participants are informed that there is no data on the safety of receiving two different COVID-19 vaccines, (2) that in the event the participant is unblinded, no further study vaccination will be permitted, (3) that unblinded participants will continue to be followed in this study in line with the Schedules of Activities, and that safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity evaluations will continue to be performed, although the data will be analyzed separately from the point of unblinding. The changes made to the clinical protocol of study VAC31518COV3009 are listed below, including the rationale of each change and a list of all applicable sections. Section number Description of Change Brief Rationale and Name 1.1 Synopsis Clarification of procedures for To ensure that if participants 6.3 Measures to Minimize Bias: unblinding of study participants become eligible to receive an Randomization and Blinding who may become eligible to receive authorized/licensed COVID-19 6.6 Continued Access to Study an authorized/licensed COVID-19 vaccine, they are aware of the Vaccine After the End of the Study vaccine during the course of the potential options and ramifications, 7.1 Discontinuation of Study study. including the lack of safety data of vaccination the authorized/licensed vaccine in 9.9 Analyses for cohort unblinded participants that have received a due to administration of an 1-dose or 2-dose Ad26.COV2.S authorized/licensed COVID-19 vaccine, and that no further study vaccine. vaccination will be permitted; that unblinded participants will continue to be followed throughout the study for safety, efficacy and immunogenicity assessments, although the data will be analyzed separately from the point of unblinding. 7.1 Discontinuation of Study Clarification that study vaccination Clarification vaccination will be discontinued in participants with molecularly confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptomatic or asymptomatic. CONFIDENTIAL – FOIA Exemptions Apply in U.S. 2 Status: Approved, Date: 18 December 2020 VAC31518 (JNJ-78436735) Clinical Protocol VAC31518COV3009 Amendment 3 Section number Description of Change Brief Rationale and Name 1.1 Synopsis psVNA was removed from the Due to lack of sensitivity of the 3 OBJECTIVES AND protocol. evaluated psVNA, the assay has ENDPOINTS been removed from the protocol wtVNA will be used to support the 8.1.4 Immunogenicity Assessments exploratory immunogenicity wtVNA is currently only qualified endpoint. and not validated and can therefore not be used to support a secondary immunogenicity endpoint unless validated. 5.1 Inclusion Criteria Inclusion criterion 4 was updated to Clarification include a timeframe for criteria a and b for stable/well-controlled HIV infection. In addition, it was clarified that participants with stable/well-controlled HIV infection that are on stable ART are included if nationwide guidelines require transition from one ART regimen to another, within a period of less than 6 months 5.2 Exclusion Criteria Exclusion criterion 4 updated for Clarification clarification. Throughout the protocol Minor errors and inconsistencies Correction of minor errors and were corrected, and minor inconsistencies. Minor clarifications were added clarifications are made. throughout the protocol. CONFIDENTIAL – FOIA Exemptions Apply in U.S. 3 Status: Approved, Date: 18 December 2020 VAC31518 (JNJ-78436735) Clinical Protocol VAC31518COV3009 Amendment 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROTOCOL AMENDMENT SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE ............................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF IN-TEXT TABLES AND FIGURES ................................................................................................ 6 1. PROTOCOL SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Synopsis........................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Schema .......................................................................................................................................... 22 1.3. Schedules of Activities ................................................................................................................... 23 1.3.1. All Participants ............................................................................................................................ 23 1.3.2. Participants With (Suspected) COVID-19................................................................................... 28 2. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 31 2.1. Study Rationale.............................................................................................................................. 34 2.2. Background .................................................................................................................................... 36 2.3. Benefit-Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................... 39 2.3.1 Risks Related to Study Participation .......................................................................................... 40 2.3.2 Benefits of Study Participation.................................................................................................... 44 2.3.3 Benefit-Risk Assessment of Study Participation ........................................................................ 44 3. OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS ..................................................................................................... 46 4. STUDY DESIGN ................................................................................................................................ 50 4.1. Overall Design................................................................................................................................ 50 4.2. Scientific Rationale for Study Design............................................................................................. 54 4.2.1. Study-Specific Ethical Design Considerations ........................................................................... 55 4.3. Justification for Dose...................................................................................................................... 56 4.4. End-of-study Definition................................................................................................................... 57 5. STUDY POPULATION ...................................................................................................................... 57 5.1. Inclusion Criteria ............................................................................................................................ 57 5.2. Exclusion Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 60 5.3. Lifestyle Considerations................................................................................................................. 62 5.4. Screen Failures .............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Risk Factors, Seroprevalence and Infectivity of Hepatitis B Virus
    ISSN: 2474-3658 Ogbonna et al. J Infect Dis Epidemiol 2021, 7:186 DOI: 10.23937/2474-3658/1510186 Volume 7 | Issue 1 Journal of Open Access Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology Research ArticlE Risk Factors, Seroprevalence and Infectivity of Hepatitis B Virus amongst Children Resident in Orphanages in a Developing Country Chioma Paulina Ogbonna, MBBS, FMCPaed1, Christian Chukwukere Ogoke, MBBS, FWACP2* , Anthony Nnaemeka Ikefuna, MBBS, FMCPaed, FRCP3,4, Tochukwu 1 Check for Chukwukadibia Ezeofor, MBBS, FMCpaed, FRCP , Emeka Charles Nwolisa, MBBS, updates FWACP, FRCP5, Franklin Chime Emerenini, MBBch, FMCpaed1, and Christopher Bismarck Eke MBBS, FWACP4,6 1Consultant Paediatrician, Department of Paediatrics, Federal Medical Centre, Owerri, Nigeria 2Paediatric Neurology Unit, Department of Paediatrics, King Fahad Central Hospital, Abu Arish 82666, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 3Professor of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Paediatrics, University of Nigeria, Nigeria 4Consultant Paediatrician, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Nigeria 5Chief Consultant Paediatrician, Federal Medical Centre, Owerri, Nigeria 6Senior Lecturer, Department of Paediatrics, University of Nigeria, Nigeria *Corresponding authors: Dr. Christian Chukwukere Ogoke, Paediatric Neurology Unit, Department of Paediatrics, King Fahad Central Hospital, Abu Arish 82666, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Abstract Results: Seroprevalence of HBsAg in children in orphanag- es was 20.0% versus 10.7% in the controls (P = 0.031). In- Background: Hepatitis B infection (HBV) remains a signifi- fectivity of HBV was higher in subjects (42.9%) than controls cant clinical and public health problem and is hyperendemic (20.0%) (P = 0.245). Sharing of towel (P = 0.014) sharing of in Nigeria. In highly endemic regions, infections spread from barbing devices (P = 0.001) and circumcision (P = 0.005) mother to child, or by horizontal transmission, with the bur- were the significant risk factors for Hepatitis B virus infec- den of infection being highest in under-fives.
    [Show full text]
  • Faqs on COVID-19 Vaccine
    COVID-19 Frequently Asked Questions COVID-19 Vaccines About COVID-19 Vaccines Q: Why is a COVID-19 vaccine needed if social distancing and wearing masks prevent the COVID-19 virus from spreading? A: Vaccines boost your immune system, so it will be ready to fight the virus if you are exposed. Vaccination combined with ongoing prevention efforts including wearing face masks that cover the mouth and nose, frequent hand washing and staying at least 6 feet away from others offer the best protection against COVID-19. Q: How many COVID-19 vaccines are available? Which one should I get? A: In the United States, three COVID-19 vaccines have been granted emergency use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended for use by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These vaccines, manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), have all been proven safe and effective at preventing serious illness, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19 disease. The CDC recommends getting the first vaccine available to you for protection from COVID-19. While vaccine supply is limited, individuals likely will not get to choose which vaccine to receive, and will be given what is available from their vaccine provider at the time they receive their immunization. Q: Are all of the COVID-19 vaccines effective? A: Yes. COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) have been approved for emergency use by the FDA, and recommended for use by the CDC after a rigorous analysis proved their effectiveness. During studies, all the vaccines were shown to prevent serious illness from COVID-19 at high effectiveness rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Committee Animal Health and Animal Welfare
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH and CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Scientific Opinions C2 - Management of scientific committees; scientific co-operation and networks Diagnostic Techniques and Vaccines for Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Classical Swine Fever, Avian Influenza and some other important OIE List A Diseases Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare Adopted 24-25th April 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABBREVIATIONS.....................................................................................................6 2. MANDATE.................................................................................................................9 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................9 4. PREAMBLE..............................................................................................................10 5. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES ................................................................................................................14 5.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................14 5.2. Screening of animal products ..........................................................................19 5.3. Nucleic acid amplification methods ................................................................19 5.3.1. Extraction of nucleic acid from the test sample ................................20 5.3.2. Target amplification
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparative Clinical Performance of Four SARS-Cov-2 Rapid Antigen Tests and Their Correlation to Infectivity in Vitro
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Article The Comparative Clinical Performance of Four SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests and Their Correlation to Infectivity In Vitro Niko Kohmer 1,†, Tuna Toptan 1,† , Christiane Pallas 1, Onur Karaca 1, Annika Pfeiffer 1 , Sandra Westhaus 1, Marek Widera 1 , Annemarie Berger 1, Sebastian Hoehl 1 , Martin Kammel 2,3, Sandra Ciesek 1,4,5,*,‡ and Holger F. Rabenau 1,*,‡ 1 Institute for Medical Virology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany; [email protected] (N.K.); [email protected] (T.T.); [email protected] (C.P.); [email protected] (O.K.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (S.W.); [email protected] (M.W.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (S.H.) 2 Institut fuer Qualitaetssicherung in der Virusdiagnostik-IQVD der GmbH, 14129 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] 3 INSTAND Gesellschaft zur Foerderung der Qualitaetssicherung in Medizinischen Laboratorien e.V., 40223 Duesseldorf, Germany 4 German Centre for Infection Research, External Partner Site, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany 5 Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (H.F.R.); Tel.: +49-696-301-5219 (S.C.); Tel.: +49-696-301-5312 (H.F.R.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Citation: Kohmer, N.; Toptan, T.; Due to globally rising numbers of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- Pallas, C.; Karaca, O.; Pfeiffer, A.; CoV-2) infections, resources for real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR)- Westhaus, S.; Widera, M.; Berger, A.; based testing have been exhausted.
    [Show full text]
  • Inferring the Association Between the Risk of COVID-19 Case Fatality and N501Y Substitution in SARS-Cov-2
    viruses Article Inferring the Association between the Risk of COVID-19 Case Fatality and N501Y Substitution in SARS-CoV-2 Shi Zhao 1,2,* , Jingzhi Lou 1, Marc K. C. Chong 1,2 , Lirong Cao 1,2 , Hong Zheng 1, Zigui Chen 3 , Renee W. Y. Chan 4,5,6,7 , Benny C. Y. Zee 1,2 , Paul K. S. Chan 3 and Maggie H. Wang 1,2,* 1 JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (M.K.C.C.); [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (H.Z.); [email protected] (B.C.Y.Z.) 2 CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China 3 Department of Microbiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] (Z.C.); [email protected] (P.K.S.C.) 4 Department of Pediatrics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] 5 Hong Kong Hub of Pediatric Excellence, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China 6 CUHK-UMCU Joint Research Laboratory of Respiratory Virus & Immunobiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China 7 Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.Z.); [email protected] (M.H.W.) Abstract: As COVID-19 is posing a serious threat to global health, the emerging mutation in SARS- CoV-2 genomes, for example, N501Y substitution, is one of the major challenges against control of the Citation: Zhao, S.; Lou, J.; Chong, pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015 MARCH 2016 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS ALEX GORSKY Chairman, Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer This year at Johnson & Johnson, we are proud this aligned with our values. Our Board of WRITTEN OVER to celebrate 130 years of helping people Directors engages in a formal review of 70 YEARS AGO, everywhere live longer, healthier and happier our strategic plans, and provides regular OUR CREDO lives. As I reflect on our heritage and consider guidance to ensure our strategy will continue UNITES & our future, I am optimistic and confident in the creating better outcomes for the patients INSPIRES THE long-term potential for our business. and customers we serve, while also creating EMPLOYEES long-term value for our shareholders. OF JOHNSON We manage our business using a strategic & JOHNSON. framework that begins with Our Credo. Written OUR STRATEGIES ARE BASED ON over 70 years ago, it unites and inspires the OUR BROAD AND DEEP KNOWLEDGE employees of Johnson & Johnson. It reminds OF THE HEALTH CARE LANDSCAPE us that our first responsibility is to the patients, IN WHICH WE OPERATE. customers and health care professionals who For 130 years, our company has been use our products, and it compels us to deliver driving breakthrough innovation in health on our responsibilities to our employees, care – from revolutionizing wound care in communities and shareholders. the 1880s to developing cures, vaccines and treatments for some of today’s most Our strategic framework positions us well pressing diseases in the world. We are acutely to continue our leadership in the markets in aware of the need to evaluate our business which we compete through a set of strategic against the changing health care environment principles: we are broadly based in human and to challenge ourselves based on the health care, our focus is on managing for the results we deliver.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Case-Fatality Rate of COVID-19 Has Been Declining Since May 2020
    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 104(6), 2021, pp. 2176–2184 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-1496 Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene The Global Case-Fatality Rate of COVID-19 Has Been Declining Since May 2020 Mohammad Nayeem Hasan,1† Najmul Haider,2† Florian L. Stigler,3 Rumi Ahmed Khan,4 David McCoy,5 Alimuddin Zumla,6,7 Richard A. Kock,2 and Md. Jamal Uddin1 1Department of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh; 2The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; 3Austrian Sickness Fund, Vienna, Austria; 4Department of Critical Care Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Centre, Orlando, Florida; 5Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and London Medical and Dental School, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; 6Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, United Kingdom; 7National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom Abstract. The objective of this study was to evaluate the trend of reported case fatality rate (rCFR) of COVID-19 over time, using globally reported COVID-19 cases and mortality data. We collected daily COVID-19 diagnoses and mortality data from the WHO’s daily situation reports dated January 1 to December 31, 2020. We performed three time-series models [simple exponential smoothing, auto-regressive integrated moving average, and automatic forecasting time- series (Prophet)] to identify the global trend of rCFR for COVID-19. We used beta regression models to investigate the association between the rCFR and potential predictors of each country and reported incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of each variable.
    [Show full text]
  • MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G
    MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G. Fast 8 Tactical Intelligence Shortcomings in Iraq: Restructuring Deputy Commanding General Battalion Intelligence to Win Brigadier General Brian A. Keller by Major Bill Benson and Captain Sean Nowlan Deputy Commandant for Futures Jerry V. Proctor Director of Training Development 16 Measuring Anti-U.S. Sentiment and Conducting Media and Support Analysis in The Republic of Korea (ROK) Colonel Eileen M. Ahearn by Major Daniel S. Burgess Deputy Director/Dean of Training Development and Support 24 Army’s MI School Faces TRADOC Accreditation Russell W. Watson, Ph.D. by John J. Craig Chief, Doctrine Division Stephen B. Leeder 25 USAIC&FH Observations, Insights, and Lessons Learned Managing Editor (OIL) Process Sterilla A. Smith by Dee K. Barnett, Command Sergeant Major (Retired) Editor Elizabeth A. McGovern 27 Brigade Combat Team (BCT) Intelligence Operations Design Director SSG Sharon K. Nieto by Michael A. Brake Associate Design Director and Administration 29 North Korean Special Operations Forces: 1996 Kangnung Specialist Angiene L. Myers Submarine Infiltration Cover Photographs: by Major Harry P. Dies, Jr. Courtesy of the U.S. Army Cover Design: 35 Deconstructing The Theory of 4th Generation Warfare Specialist Angiene L. Myers by Del Stewart, Chief Warrant Officer Three (Retired) Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelli- gence Center and Fort Huachuca (USAIC&FH) publishes the Military DEPARTMENTS Intelligence Professional Bulle- tin quarterly under provisions of AR 2 Always Out Front 58 Language Action 25-30. MIPB disseminates mate- rial designed to enhance individu- 3 CSM Forum 60 Professional Reader als’ knowledge of past, current, and emerging concepts, doctrine, materi- 4 Technical Perspective 62 MIPB 2004 Index al, training, and professional develop- ments in the MI Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • Volu Is Here to Stay!
    AUGUST 2020 edited by: Capt Joshua M. Nussbaum, PAWG Assistant Director of Professional Development VolU is Here to Stay! Inside This Issue 2 From the Editor 2 PD Track Advancements 2 Welcome Our New PDOs! 3 Cohort Request 4 VolU Uploads 5 Self-Study vs. Cohorts 8 Becoming an Instructor 9 2020 Course Grads 10 2020 PAWG Conference 11 Cadet Programs Waiver 11 Grandfather Clause 12 Motivation 12 Submissions 12 Contact Us!! 2 From the Editor When was the last time you tried something new? I remember one of my high school yearbooks had the motif of “something old, something new; something black, something blue.” Our school’s colors were pitch black and turquoise blue. Everything we do, everything we see, and everything we like- was once something new. The first time you ate at your favorite restaurant? You had never tried it before. The car you own? You had to take a first drive at some point. Your favorite TV show? It was new some time. Your career? I’m sure there was anxiety in the beginning. Our decision to join Civil Air Patrol was once something new, as well! When we each began this journey, we all had something to spark our interest. Whether a child joined, we joined for the aerospace education, or we wanted to fly, we wanted to learn how to complete missing person searches- something intrigued us and we kept coming back. Volunteer University, our new online learning system, is up and running. There are still minor edits being made, but the overarching product is here to stay.
    [Show full text]
  • Research & Development of Vaccines to Prevent SARS-Cov2 Infection
    Monthly update Research & development of vaccines to prevent SARS-coV2 infection Updated May 2021 Disclaimer No vaccine against COVID-19 is approved. This document does not provide guidance on what vaccine or medicines to take. Please avoid self-prescription and always refer to your doctor before making any treatment decision. This document provides a selection of updates on the research and development of vaccines for the current coronavirus infection. Those highlights are for the information of patient organisations/ groups, advocates and people living with a rare disease. EURORDIS takes reasonable steps to verify the accuracy of the information presented. This document does not constitute, and shall not be deemed or construed as, any approval or endorsement by EURORDIS of such product or entity. Updated May 2021 Contents (click to navigate in document) A ‘must-read’ introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Vaccines in development ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Under S66 of the Commerce Act 1986 Application by Johnson & Johnson to Acquire the Stock, Assets and Business Of
    PUBLIC COPY Notice under s66 of the Commerce Act 1986 Application by Johnson & Johnson to acquire the stock, assets and business of the Consumer Healthcare division of Pfizer Inc. COMMERCE ACT 1986: BUSINESS ACQUISITION SECTION 66: NOTICE SEEKING CLEARANCE 28 September 2006 The Registrar Business Acquisitions and Authorisations Commerce Commission PO Box 2351 Wellington Pursuant to s66(1) of the Commerce Act 1986 notice is hereby given seeking clearance of a proposed business acquisition. 518689_1.DOC 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART 1: TRANSACTION DETAILS 1 The business acquisition for which clearance is sought 2 The person giving this notice 3 Confidentiality 4 Participants 5 Interconnected and associated persons 6 Beneficial interests 7 Links between participants 8 Common directorships 9 Business activities of the participants 10 Reasons for the proposed acquisition PART II: IDENTIFICATION OF MARKETS AFFECTED 11 Horizontal aggregation 12 Differentiated product markets 13 Differentiated product markets 14 Vertical integration 15 Other business acquisitions PARTS III, IV AND V: CONSTRAINTS ON MARKET POWERS BY EXISTING AND POTENTIAL COMPETITION AND OTHER POTENTIAL CONSTRAINTS 16 Allergy medication 17 Products for the treatment of worms 18 Thrush treatment CERTIFICATE APPENDICES 1. Heartburn and indigestion remedies (MYLANTA and MOTILIUM) 2. Worm treatments (COMBANTRIN, VERMOX) 3. Cold, flu, nasal decongestant, cough relief and sort throat medications (CODRAL, SINUTAB, SUDAFED, BENADRYL, BRONDECON) 4. Allergy relief products (ACTIFED, SINUTAB, SUDAFED, VISINE, LIVOSTIN) 518689_1.DOC 3 5. Thrush treatments (DIFLUCAN ONE, DAKTARIN, DAKTAGOLD, NIZORAL, SPORANOX) 6. Shampoo (PREGAINE, ROGAINE, NEUTROGENA, JOHNSON’S BABY SHAMPOO) 7. Hand hygiene (PURELL and MICRO SHIELD) 8. Competitor worm treatment products 9. Multinational pharmaceutical businesses: GlaxoSmithKline, Douglas Pharmaceuticals, Alphapharm, Bayer Group 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnson & Johnson's Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine Info
    Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine: Is It Efficacious? Purpose There has been observed brand hesitancy between the Johnson & Johnson Janssen COVID-19 vaccine as compared to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine where individuals have expressed concerns over disparities in efficacy. This likely stems from the blanket efficacy statements reported in media outlets where the Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine reports an efficacy of 72% compared to 94% & 95% for Moderna and Pfizer respectively. The purpose of this info-bite is to clarify the concerns over efficacy so we can reassure our patients that all three vaccination options are efficacious and safe. The goal is to reduce vaccine brand hesitancy, as it may lead to a delay in vaccination, which may put our patients at risk. Is the Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine efficacious? Yes, the Johnson & Johnson Janssen vaccine has proven efficacy. Its reportedly 100% efficacious against death due to COVID-19 AND prevention against hospitalization. Additionally, it is potentially effective against variant strains as it maintained high efficacy against severe disease (73-82%) across world regions. The 72% efficacy often noted includes prevention of mild & moderate disease; it is unclear at this time how efficacious the vaccine is against mild & moderate disease. Is the Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine less efficacious than the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine? There is no evidence to claim that any of the three vaccines available are more efficacious than another. None of these vaccines have been compared in a head-to-head trial. Additionally, since the vaccine trials were tested at different times and locations, it further reduces one’s ability to claim one is better than the other.
    [Show full text]