DOCSLIB.ORG

2015-2019 Natural Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015-2019 Natural Agenda Natural Agenda A Strategic Plan for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Fiscal Years 2015–2019 AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN For Fiscal Years 2015-2019 by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Dan Allen Hughes, Jr., Chairman June 4, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Beeville Ralph H. Duggins, Vice-Chairman May 6, 2013 – February 1, 2019 Fort Worth T. Dan Friedkin, Chairman-Emeritus February 2, 2011 – February 1, 2017 Houston Roberto De Hoyos September 6, 2013 – February 1, 2019 Austin Bill Jones September 1, 2011 – February 1, 2017 Austin James H. Lee May 6, 2013 – February 1, 2019 Houston Margaret Martin February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Boerne S. Reed Morian February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Houston Dick Scott September 1, 2011 – February 1, 2017 Wimberley Lee M. Bass, Chairman-Emeritus Submitted July 7, 2014 Signed: ________________________________ Approved: ________________________________ Carter Smith Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. Executive Director Chairman Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission Natural Agenda | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statewide Vision, Mission and Philosophy.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Relevant Statewide Goals and Benchmarks ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 TPWD Mission and Philosophy.................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Internal/External Assessment Overview of Agency Scope and Functions .....................................................................................................................................................6 Main Functions ...................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Affected Populations .......................................................................................................................................................................................6 Public Perception ................................................................................................................................................................................................7 Organizational Aspects ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Size and Composition of Workforce ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Organizational Structure ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Geographic Location of Agency ...............................................................................................................................................................9 Location of Service Populations .............................................................................................................................................................10 Capital Assets ....................................................................................................................................................................................................11 Historically Underutilized Businesses ...............................................................................................................................................15 Contract Manager Training .....................................................................................................................................................................16 Key Events, Areas of Change and Impact on Agency .............................................................................................................. 17 Fiscal Aspects ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Appropriations ..................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Method of Finance ..........................................................................................................................................................................................24 Budgetary/Financial Limitations and Issues ................................................................................................................................24 Short- and Long-Term Funding Needs ...............................................................................................................................................27 Technological Developments .................................................................................................................................................................................33 Current Activities and Initiatives ..........................................................................................................................................................34 Future Needs and Initiatives....................................................................................................................................................................37 Demographic Trends .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 Economic Variables ......................................................................................................................................................................................................43 State Legislative Issues ..............................................................................................................................................................................................45 Impact of Federal Statutes/Issues .......................................................................................................................................................................51 Self-Evaluation and Opportunities for Improvement .............................................................................................................................55 Strategic Priorities .........................................................................................................................................................................................................61 TPWD Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures ....................................................................................................................................74 Technology Resource Planning ................................................................................................................................................................................82 Appendices: Appendix A – Agency Planning Process ........................................................................................................................................................91 Appendix B – Organizational Chart .................................................................................................................................................................. 93 Appendix C – Outcome Projections .................................................................................................................................................................. 94 Appendix D – Measure Definitions ....................................................................................................................................................................95 Appendix E – Workforce Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................. 126 Appendix F – Survey of Employee Engagement Results .................................................................................................................. 139 2 | Natural Agenda STATEWIDE VISION, MISSION AND PHILOSOPHY From Strengthening Our Prosperity: The Statewide Strategic Planning Elements for Texas State Government, Governor Rick Perry, March 2014 STATE VISION Ensuring the economic competitiveness of our state by adhering to principles of fiscal discipline, setting clear budget priorities, living within our means, and limiting the growth of government; Investing in critical water, energy and transportation infrastructure needs to meet the demands of our rapidly growing state; Ensuring excellence and accountability in public schools and institutions of higher education as we invest in the future of this state and ensure Texans are prepared to compete in the global marketplace; Defending Texans by safeguarding our neighborhoods and protecting our international border; and Increasing transparency and efficiency at all levels of government to guard against
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabine Lake Galveston Bay East Matagorda Bay Matagorda Bay Corpus Christi Bay Aransas Bay San Antonio Bay Laguna Madre Planning
    River Basins Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin TPWD Canadian River Basin Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Wolf Creek Colorado River Basin Lipscomb Gene Howe WMA-W.A. (Pat) Murphy Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin R i t Strategic Planning a B r ve Gene Howe WMA l i Hartley a Hutchinson R n n Cypress Creek Basin Moore ia Roberts Hemphill c ad a an C C r e Guadalupe River Basin e k Lavaca River Basin Oldham r Potter Gray ive Regions Carson ed R the R ork of Wheeler Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin North F ! Amarillo Neches River Basin Salt Fork of the Red River Deaf Smith Armstrong 10Randall Donley Collingsworth Palo Duro Canyon Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin Playa Lakes WMA-Taylor Unit Pr airie D og To Nueces River Basin wn Fo rk of t he Red River Parmer Playa Lakes WMA-Dimmit Unit Swisher Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Castro Briscoe Hall Childress Caprock Canyons Caprock Canyons Trailway N orth P Red River Basin ease River Hardeman Lamb Rio Grande River Basin Matador WMA Pease River Bailey Copper Breaks Hale Floyd Motley Cottle Wilbarger W To Wichita hi ng ver Sabine River Basin te ue R Foard hita Ri er R ive Wic Riv i r Wic Clay ta ve er hita hi Pat Mayse WMA r a Riv Rive ic Eisenhower ichit r e W h W tl Caddo National Grassland-Bois D'arc 6a Nort Lit San Antonio River Basin Lake Arrowhead Lamar Red River Montague South Wichita River Cooke Grayson Cochran Fannin Hockley Lubbock Lubbock Dickens King Baylor Archer T ! Knox rin Bonham North Sulphur San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin Crosby r it River ive y R Bowie R B W iv os r es
    [Show full text]
  • Matagorda Island State Park Legend: Matagorda Island Espiritu Santo Bay Visitor Center/ State Park and Wildlife Management Area Museum State Parks Store
    Matagorda Island State Park Legend: Matagorda Island Espiritu Santo Bay Visitor Center/ State Park and Wildlife Management Area Museum State Parks Store Ordance Loop East Bay Wildlife Checkstation I. Wildlife Management Area (WMA). and Workshop Rest Rooms Twenty-two miles in length and 36,568 acres in Road size, this area offers limited recreational use Showers SEADRIFT McDowell East Drive such as nature study, birdwatching and fishing. USFS Point Headquarters Supervised hunts may be held, and fishing is 185 Matagorda Avenue Primitive Tent Sites el permitted subject to the proclamations of the ve Dri outh Group Barracks Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission. These S activities are monitored closely and may be Closed Airstrip Boat Dock restricted or prohibited if they become Beach Access Road detrimental to management goals. Victoria Chann Picnic Table Closed Airstrip II. Park Area. The remaining 7,325 acres Scenic View at the northeastern end of the island Mosquito Webb Point Bird Observation include two miles of beach Point Broad which is open to year-round Bayou visitation with receational 185 Boggy Park Recreation activities such as picnicking, Bayou Areas fishing, hiking, beachwalking, Dogger Point Live Oak Bayou nature study, swimming PORT Park Conservation O'CONNOR and primitive camping. Area Gulf Intracoastal W San Antonio Bay aterway Blackberry Island Aransas Bay Wildlife Conservation National Island Coast Guard Wildlife y Shoalwater Dewberry Station Barroom Bay Area Refuge Live Oak Point stal Waterwa Island Matagorda Dock Annex Mustang Gulf Intracoa Grass Island Lake Primary Whooping Redfish Long MAINLAND OFFICE Crane Use Area Slough Teller Espiritu Santo Bay Point AND Steamboat INFORMATION False Live Oak Point Island Bayucos CENTER Bayucos Saluria Island • Access.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Agenda a Strategic Plan for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
    FISCAL YEARS 2011–2015 Natural Agenda A Strategic Plan for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN For Fiscal Years 2011-2015 by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Peter M. Holt, Chairman May 9, 2005 – February 1, 2011 San Antonio T. Dan Friedkin, Vice-Chairman May 9, 2005 – February 1, 2011 Houston Mark E. Bivins September 28, 2005 – February 1, 2011 Amarillo Ralph H. Duggins February 19, 2008 – February 1, 2013 Fort Worth Antonio Falcon, M.D. August 14, 2007 – February 1, 2013 Rio Grande City Karen J. Hixon August 14, 2007 – February 1, 2013 San Antonio Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. June 4, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Beeville Margaret Martin February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Boerne S. Reed Morian February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Houston Lee M. Bass, Chairman-Emeritus Submitted July 2, 2010 Signed: ________________________________ Approved: ________________________________ Carter Smith Peter M. Holt Executive Director Chairman Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission NATURAL AGENDA | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statewide Vision, Mission and Philosophy ................................................................................................................ 2 Relevant Statewide Goals and Benchmarks ................................................................................................................ 3 TPWD Mission and Philosophy ................................................................................................................................. 5 Internal/External Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Fire Activity Report
    2012 US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE Regional Map i TABLE OF CONTENTS 2012 Fire Statistics Regional Map............................................................................................................... i Regional Activity Summaries Pacific............................................................................................................... 1 Southwest......................................................................................................... 5 Midwest............................................................................................................ 14 Southeast.......................................................................................................... 16 Northeast.......................................................................................................... 21 Mountain-Prairie.............................................................................................. 29 Alaska............................................................................................................... 34 Pacific Southwest............................................................................................. 42 Wildfires Fire Activity Map............................................................................................. 47 Number / Acres (graphs).................................................................................. 48 By State............................................................................................................ 49 By Refuge Pacific..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Matagorda Island Lighthouse Aransas National Wildlife Refuge Complex
    Matagorda Island Lighthouse Aransas National Wildlife Refuge Complex Matagorda Island Lighthouse was built in 1852 and served as an historical navigational aid allowing maritime transportation to Matagorda Bay and its ports. The 55-foot cast iron tower was originally erected on the northeast end of Matagorda Island at the entrance to Pass Cavallo and was painted with red, white, and black horizontal stripes to make it visible. The lighthouse was expanded by 24 feet in 1857. During the Civil War, the light remained dark. Confederate soldiers attempted to destroy the light so that it would not fall into Union hands. They broke several of the cast iron plates and buried the lens in sand to prevent it from falling into Union hands. After the war, the tower was disassembled and moved inland to Figure 5. Lighthouse Tower higher ground (Figure 5). A new foundation was poured, the tower was erected, and the damage was repaired. With a new fresnel lens and fresh coat of black paint, the lighthouse was put back in service on September 1, 1873. Light keepers operated the light until 1956, when electricity reached the island. The Coast Guard decommissioned the lighthouse in 1995 and transferred it to the Service. The lens was removed about six years ago and is now on display at the museum in Port Lavaca. The lighthouse is on the National Register of Historic Places and has been recognized by the Texas Historical Commission. The Service, Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the Texas General Land Office have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to jointly manage Matagorda Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfilm Publication M617, Returns from U.S
    Publication Number: M-617 Publication Title: Returns from U.S. Military Posts, 1800-1916 Date Published: 1968 RETURNS FROM U.S. MILITARY POSTS, 1800-1916 On the 1550 rolls of this microfilm publication, M617, are reproduced returns from U.S. military posts from the early 1800's to 1916, with a few returns extending through 1917. Most of the returns are part of Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General's Office; the remainder is part of Record Group 393, Records of United States Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920, and Record Group 395, Records of United States Army Overseas Operations and Commands, 1898-1942. The commanding officer of every post, as well ad commanders of all other bodies of troops such as department, division, brigade, regiment, or detachment, was required by Army Regulations to submit a return (a type of personnel report) to The Adjutant General at specified intervals, usually monthly, on forms provided by that office. Several additions and modifications were made in the form over the years, but basically it was designed to show the units that were stationed at a particular post and their strength, the names and duties of the officers, the number of officers present and absent, a listing of official communications received, and a record of events. In the early 19th century the form used for the post return usually was the same as the one used for regimental or organizational returns. Printed forms were issued by the Adjutant General’s Office, but more commonly used were manuscript forms patterned after the printed forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach and Bay Access Guide
    Texas Beach & Bay Access Guide Second Edition Texas General Land Office Jerry Patterson, Commissioner The Texas Gulf Coast The Texas Gulf Coast consists of cordgrass marshes, which support a rich array of marine life and provide wintering grounds for birds, and scattered coastal tallgrass and mid-grass prairies. The annual rainfall for the Texas Coast ranges from 25 to 55 inches and supports morning glories, sea ox-eyes, and beach evening primroses. Click on a region of the Texas coast The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on these maps, or the data from which it was produced. These maps are NOT suitable for navigational purposes and do not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. How to Use This Guide 3 III. Beach and Bay Public Access Sites A. Southeast Texas 7 (Jefferson and Orange Counties) 1. Map 2. Area information 3. Activities/Facilities B. Houston-Galveston (Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Matagorda Counties) 21 1. Map 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities C. Golden Crescent (Calhoun, Jackson and Victoria Counties) 1. Map 79 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities D. Coastal Bend (Aransas, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio Counties) 1. Map 96 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities E. Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron and Willacy Counties) 1. Map 2. Area Information 128 3. Activities/Facilities IV. National Wildlife Refuges V. Wildlife Management Areas VI. Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Centers 139 143 147 Introduction It’s no wonder that coastal communities are the most densely populated and fastest growing areas in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan Draft
    MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Five Year Update RED RIVER COUNTY TEXAS INCORPORATED AND UNINCORPORATED AREAS 1 Table of Contents SUBJECT PAGE/S Cover Table Of Contents SECTION I Purpose Plan Organizational Structure The Planning Process Map: Red River County State Location Map: Red River County County Government Economic Considerations Resource Information Table: Important Dates Table: Red River County Team Members Background and Contributions Table: Identified Stakeholders Public Participation SECTION II Hazard Identification and Assessment Table: Areas of Risk: Hazards Identified Table: Natural Hazards Most Likely to Occur in red River County Table: Hazards Listed in the Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan Not Included in the Red River Plan Table: Potential Severity of Impacts Table: Probability of Future Events Table: Warning Time Table: Duration Table: Priority Risk Index Table: Hazard Vulnerability Table: Red River County Damage Assessment Hazard Analysis Flood Map: Clarksville Floodplains Map: Avery Floodplains Map: Avery Floodplains Map: Annona Floodplains Map: Bogata Floodplains Map: Detroit Floodplains History of Flooding in Red River County Table: National Flood Insurance Program Participation Table: Red River County Flood Risk Table: Extent Table: Estimated Property Loss Location, Extent, Impact, Probability, Vulnerability, Summary 2 Tornadoes Description Map: Wind Zones in the United States Table: Enhanced Fujita Scale Table: Red River County Tornadoes Table: Probability/Severity Table: Red River County Tornado Risk Table: Estimated Property
    [Show full text]
  • Hays County Parks, Recreation and Open Space
    T h e S c r i p p s H o w a r d HAYS COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE SURVEY JULY 2000 815 Brazos Suite 800, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 478-9646; (512) 478-1537 fax TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………….3-7 QUESTIONS……………………..……………………………………………8-16 DEMOGRAPHICS.………………………………………………………….17-18 RESIDENT COMMENTS…………………………………………………. 18-19 METHODOLOGY……..…….…………………………………………………20 ABOUT THE TEXAS POLL/ SCRIPPS DATA CENTER…………………………………………………….20 Page 2 SUMMARY Hays County residents rank river/creek access as the No. 1 public recreational facility need in Hays County, according to a survey conducted by The Scripps Howard Texas Poll. Twenty-eight percent of Hays County residents ranked river/creek access as the No. 1 need. Other needs and the percentage who ranked them No. 1 were: ? Playgrounds (8 percent) ? Picnic tables (3 percent) ? Fishing lakes (8 percent) ? Baseball fields (3 percent) ? Trails (8 percent) ? Softball fields (2 percent) ? Camping sites (7 percent) ? Soccer fields (2 percent) ? Picnic pavilions (5 percent) ? Basketball courts (1 percent) ? Nature study areas (5 percent) ? Volleyball courts (1 percent) ? Bird watching/wildlife sites (4 ? Tennis courts (less than 1 percent) percent) The survey asked residents a variety of questions regarding parks, recreation and open space. The Scripps Howard Texas Poll conducted the survey from April 24 to June 20, mailing 2,000 questionnaires to a random sample of Hays County residents. A total of 943 residents completed and returned the survey - - a 47 percent response rate. County Involvement A majority of Hays County residents support the county acquiring, managing and funding parks, and 71 percent are concerned about growth stripping the county of its rural character.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion Regarding the Issuance of an Endangered Species Act of 1973, As Amended, (Act) Section 10(A)(1)(B) Permit
    Biological Opinion for TE-065406-0 This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion regarding the issuance of an Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (Act) Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit. The federal action under consideration is the issuance of a permit authorizing the incidental take of the federally listed endangered Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis) under the authority of sections 10(a)(1)(B) and 10(a)(2) of the Act. Boy Scouts of America, Capitol Area Council No. 564 (BSA/CAC) has submitted an application for an incidental take permit under the Act for take of the Houston toad. An Environmental Assessment/Habitat Conservation Plan (EA/HCP) has been reviewed for mitigation acceptability. The implementing regulations for Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act, as provided for by 50 CFR 17.22, specify the criteria by which a permit allowing the incidental "take" of listed endangered species pursuant to otherwise lawful activities may be obtained. The purpose and need for the Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit is to ensure that incidental take resulting from the proposed construction and operation of a “High Adventure” camp on the 4,848-acre Griffith League Ranch in Bastrop County, Texas, will be minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable, and that the take is not expected to appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of this federally listed endangered species in the wild or adversely modify or destroy its federally designated critical habitat. The two federally listed species identified within this EA/HCP include the endangered Houston toad (and its designated critical habitat) and the threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).
    [Show full text]