DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan San Joaquin Council of Governments Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Plan September 2012 This page intentionally left blank. SJCOG BP~SRtS Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1. Vision, Goals, and Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2. Organization of the Plan ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 2. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.1. Setting ......................................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2. Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 2-7 3. Needs Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1. Bicyclists’ General Needs and Preferences ......................................................................................... 3-1 3.2. Pedestrians’ General Needs and Preferences .................................................................................... 3-2 3.3. General School Needs and Preferences .............................................................................................. 3-3 3.4. Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel in San Joaquin County ................................................................... 3-3 3.5. Benefits of Walking and Bicycling ...................................................................................................... 3-5 3.6. Collision Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 3-7 4. Project Formation ........................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1. Project Formation Guidelines ................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2. Cost Estimates .......................................................................................................................................... 4-8 5. Projects ......................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1. Bicycle Parking and End-of-Trip Facilities ....................................................................................... 5-3 5.2. City of Escalon .......................................................................................................................................... 5-4 5.3. City of Lathrop .......................................................................................................................................... 5-7 5.4. City of Lodi .............................................................................................................................................. 5-10 5.5. City of Manteca ....................................................................................................................................... 5-15 5.6. City of Ripon ........................................................................................................................................... 5-19 5.7. County of San Joaquin .......................................................................................................................... 5-24 5.8. City of Stockton ...................................................................................................................................... 5-28 5.9. City of Tracy ............................................................................................................................................ 5-36 6. Program Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1. Education ..................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2. Encouragement ......................................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.3. Enforcement ............................................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.4. Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................... 6-4 7. Implementation and Funding Strategy ..................................................................................... 7-1 7.1. Priority Projects ......................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2. Implementation ......................................................................................................................................... 7-7 7.3. Funding Projects through Measure K ................................................................................................ 7-8 7.4. Funding Opportunities ........................................................................................................................... 7-9 7.5. Other Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 7-15 Alta Planning + Design |i Table of Contents Appendix A. Bicycle Design Guidelines............................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B. Pedestrian Design Guidelines ....................................................................................... B-1 Appendix C. Safe Routes to School Toolkit ......................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D. BTA Compliance Table ................................................................................................... D-1 Appendix E. Project Tables ................................................................................................................... E-1 Appendix F. Plan and Polcy Review .................................................................................................... F-1 Appendix G. Peer Plan Review ............................................................................................................ G-1 Appendix H. Comments Received ....................................................................................................... H-1 Table of Figures Figure 2-1: Caltrans Design Standards for Bicycle Facilities ........................................................................... 2-8 Figure 2-2: Shared Lane Marking ............................................................................................................................ 2-9 Figure 2-3: Regional Existing Bikeways ............................................................................................................... 2-11 Figure 2-4: Escalon Existing Bikeways ................................................................................................................ 2-12 Figure 2-5: Lathrop Existing Bikeways ................................................................................................................ 2-13 Figure 2-6: Lodi Existing Bikeways ...................................................................................................................... 2-14 Figure 2-7: Manteca Existing Bikeways .............................................................................................................. 2-15 Figure 2-8: Ripon Existing Bikeways ................................................................................................................... 2-16 Figure 2-9: Stockton Existing Bikeways .............................................................................................................. 2-17 Figure 2-10: Tracy Existing Bikeways .................................................................................................................. 2-18 Figure 2-11: Typical Sidewalk Zones in Commercial Areas ........................................................................... 2-20 Figure 2-12: Typical Sidewalk Zones in Residential Areas ............................................................................ 2-20 Figure 2-13: Curb Extension ................................................................................................................................... 2-21 Figure 2-14: Crosswalk Types ................................................................................................................................ 2-21 Figure 2-15: Refuge Island ........................................................................................................................................ 2-22 Figure 2-16: Curb Ramp Types ............................................................................................................................... 2-22 Figure 2-17: CA MUTCD Regulatory Signs .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office
    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisons, Drugs and Society Held in Bern from 20 to 06.984 22 September 2001
    6984-Couv.Prisons, drogues 13/07/09 17:01 Page 1 Drugs and addiction This publication has been produced within the framework of the Publishing Council of Europe Conference on Prisons, Drugs and Society held in Bern from 20 to 06.984 22 September 2001. The conference was organised jointly by the Pompidou Group and the World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe (Health in Prisons Project), with the participa- tion and on the invitation of the Swiss authorities. The first part of the publication contains information about the conference itself including some of the reports presented. The second part contains a consensus statement adopted at this occa- sion. The aim of this consensus statement is to encourage, where appropriate, effective change in policies and practices relating to prisons and drugs. It draws together in a European context the fundamental areas on which a general agreement has been reached. PRISONS, D RUGS AND SOCIETY COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L'EUROPE The Council of Europe has forty-four member states, covering virtually the entire continent of Europe. It seeks to develop common democratic and legal principles based on the European Convention on Human Rights and other reference texts on the protection of individuals. Ever since it was founded in 1949, in the aftermath of the second world war, the Council of P Europe has symbolised reconciliation. RISONS , D ISBN 92-871-5090-7 RUGS AND S 9 789287 150905 OCIETY Council of Europe Publishers http://book.coe.int EditionsCouncil du Conseil of Europe de l’Europe Publishing
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C LMA-Specific Hazards and Projects
    Appendix C Appendix C LMA-Specific Hazards and Projects Lower San Joaquin River and Delta South Regional Flood Management Plan November 2014 Appendix C --Page initially blank-- Lower San Joaquin River and Delta South Regional Flood Management Plan November 2014 Appendix C Contents 1 Overview to Appendix C 1 2 Lower San Joaquin River Region 5 2.1 Cities 5 2.1.1 City of Stockton/San Joaquin County 5 2.1.2 City of Lathrop 33 2.1.3 City of Manteca 41 2.2 Reclamation Districts 45 2.2.1 RD 17 Mossdale 45 2.2.2 RD 403 Rough and Ready Island 50 2.2.3 RD 404 Boggs Tract 51 2.2.4 RD 828 Weber Tract 56 2.2.5 RD 1608 Lincoln Village West 56 2.2.6 RD 1614 Smith Tract 60 2.2.7 RD 2042 Bishop Tract 62 2.2.8 RD 2064 River Junction 62 2.2.9 RD 2074 Sargent Barnhart Tract 67 2.2.10 RD 2075 McMullin Ranch 70 2.2.11 RD 2094 Walthall 74 2.2.12 RD 2096 Weatherbee Island 77 2.2.13 RD 2115 Shima Tract 78 2.2.14 RD 2119 Wright-Elmwood Tract 80 2.2.15 RD 2126 Atlas Tract 83 3 Delta South Region 85 3.1 Cities 85 3.2 Reclamation Districts 85 3.2.1 RD 1 Union Island East 85 3.2.2 RD 2 Union Island West 92 3.2.3 RD 524 Middle Roberts Island 96 3.2.4 RD 544 Upper Roberts Island 103 3.2.5 RD 684 Lower Roberts Island 108 3.2.6 RD 773 Fabian Tract 111 3.2.7 RD 1007 Pico & Nagle 115 3.2.8 RD 2058 Pescadero 118 3.2.9 RD 2062 Stewart Tract 123 3.2.10 RD 2085 Kasson District 127 3.2.11 RD 2089 Stark Tract 130 3.2.12 RD 2095 Paradise Junction 136 3.2.13 RD 2107 Mossdale Island 140 3.2.14 RD 2116 Holt and Drexler Tract & Drexler Pocket 142 i Lower San Joaquin River and Delta South Regional Flood Management Plan November 2014 Appendix C --Page initially blank-- ii Lower San Joaquin River and Delta South Regional Flood Management Plan November 2014 Appendix C 1 Overview to Appendix C This appendix contains information for each city and local maintaining agency (LMA) within the Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • John Collins Production Designer
    John Collins Production Designer Credits include: BRASSIC Director: Rob Quinn, George Kane Comedy Drama Series Producer: Mags Conway Featuring: Joseph Gilgun, Michelle Keegan, Damien Molony Production Co: Calamity Films / Sky1 FEEL GOOD Director: Ally Pankiw Drama Series Producer: Kelly McGolpin Featuring: Mae Martin, Charlotte Richie, Sophie Thompson Production Co: Objective Fiction / Netflix THE BAY Directors: Robert Quinn, Lee Haven-Jones Crime Thriller Series Producers: Phil Leach, Margaret Conway, Alex Lamb Featuring: Morven Christie, Matthew McNulty, Louis Greatrex Production Co: Tall Story Pictures / ITV GIRLFRIENDS Directors: Kay Mellor, Dominic Leclerc Drama Series Producer: Josh Dynevor Featuring: Miranda Richardson, Phyllis Logan, Zoe Wanamaker Production Co: Rollem Productions / ITV LOVE, LIES AND RECORDS Directors: Dominic Leclerc, Cilla Ware Drama Producer: Yvonne Francas Featuring: Ashley Jensen, Katarina Cas, Kenny Doughty Production Co: Rollem Productions / BBC One LAST TANGO IN HALIFAX Director: Juliet May Drama Series Producer: Karen Lewis Featuring: Sarah Lancashire, Nicola Walker, Derek Jacobi Production Co: Red Production Company / Sky Living PARANOID Directors: Kenny Glenaan, John Duffy Detective Drama Series Producer: Tom Sherry Featuring: Indira Varma, Robert Glennister, Dino Fetscher Production Co: Red Production Company / ITV SILENT WITNESS Directors: Stuart Svassand Mystery Crime Drama Series Producer: Ceri Meryrick Featuring: Emilia Fox, Richard Lintern, David Caves Production Co: BBC One Creative Media Management
    [Show full text]
  • Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease with Initial Right Hemiparesis Masquerading As
    CASE Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with initial right REPORT hemiparesis masquerading as a stroke KF Ko 高貴護 WY Lau 劉永欣 The early stage of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is generally characterised by progressive WK Cheng 鄭永強 changes in behaviour and intellectual function. While only a few patients have stroke-like MC Kwan 關緬中 onset, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with initial monoparesis has been described. In this report, a LK Yip 葉麗娟 patient with an unusual sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with typical magnetic resonance imaging findings, positive cerebrospinal fluid 14-3-3 brain protein, sharp-wave complexes in electroencephalogram, and initial right hemiparesis is reported. Introduction Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is the most common human prion disease.1 While between 10% and 15% of cases are familial and a small number are iatrogenic, most (85%) are sporadic. The early stage of sporadic CJD is characterised by changes in behaviour and intellectual function, often followed by ataxia, abnormality of vision, and myoclonic jerks involving either a limb or the entire body.2 The minority of cases may have atypical presentations with abrupt onset and prolonged progression.3,4 However, CJD presenting with initial neurological symptoms and signs masquerading as a stroke is exceptional.5 Previously, CJD with initial monoparesis has been reported.6 In this report, a patient with CJD presenting with right hemiparesis is described. Case report A 60-year-old woman presented in January 2009 with a 2-week history of right-sided weakness and associated difficulty in writing (she was right-handed). She was also found to be increasingly irritable, with poor concentration and memory.
    [Show full text]
  • GRA 9 – South Delta
    2-900 .! 2-905 .! 2-950 .! 2-952 2-908 .! .! 2-910 .! 2-960 .! 2-915 .! 2-963 .! 2-964 2-965 .! .! 2-917 .! 2-970 2-920 ! .! . 2-922 .! 2-924 .! 2-974 .! San Joaquin County 2-980 2-929 .! .! 2-927 .! .! 2-925 2-932 2-940 Contra Costa .! .! County .! 2-930 2-935 .! Alameda 2-934 County ! . Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 Calif. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Area Map Office of Spill Prevention and Response I Data Source: O SPR NAD_1983_C alifornia_Teale_Albers ACP2 - GRA9 Requestor: ACP Coordinator Author: J. Muskat Date Created: 5/2 Environmental Sensitive Sites Section 9849 – GRA 9 South Delta Table of Contents GRA 9 Map ............................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... 2 Site Index/Response Action ...................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Response Resources for GRA 9......................................................................... 4 9849.1 Environmentally Sensitive Sites 2-900-A Old River Mouth at San Joaquin River....................................................... 1 2-905-A Franks Tract Complex................................................................................... 4 2-908-A Sand Mound Slough ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RD799 Five Year Plan
    Reclamation District 799 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan May 2012 Prepared by 2365 Iron Point Road, Suite 300 Folsom, CA 95630 This page intentionally left blank. RD 799 Five Year Plan Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Brief History of Hotchkiss Tract .......................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Geomorphic Evolution ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Historical Flood Events ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 Existing level of protection ........................................................................................................... 6 3.0 Identification of Need for Improvements to Alleviate or Minimize Existing Hazards ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Local Assets ....................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Non-local Assets and Public Benefit ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • WR4 Ep 1 Shooting Script Script
    WR4 Episode 1 Lilac Amendments 15 07 08 1. 1 SCENE 1 INT HOSPITAL ROOM ANYTIME DAY A 1 THE LIGHTING IS MILKY AND WASHED-OUT AS RACHEL WAKES UP IN HER HOSPITAL BED, WEARING HER HOSPITAL GOWN. SHE LOOKS CONFUSED. THE SILENCE IN THE ROOM IS DEATHLY. SHE THROWS BACK THE SHEETS AND SWINGS HER LEGS OUT OF THE BED. WOOZY, SHE WALKS ACROSS THE ROOM AND OPENS THE DOOR... CUT TO: WR4 Episode 1 Lilac Amendments 15 07 08 2. 2 SCENE 2 INT HOSPITAL CORRIDOR ANYTIME DAY A 2 SHE HAS TO SUPPORT HERSELF ON THE DOOR FRAME AS SHE COMES INTO THE DESERTED, EERILY SILENT CORRIDOR. RACHEL Hello? SHE STARTS TO WALK DOWN THE CORRIDOR AND HESITANTLY PUSHES OPEN ONE OF THE SIDE DOORS AS... RACHEL (cont’d) Is there anyone there? CUT TO: WR4 Episode 1 Lilac Amendments 15 07 08 3. 3 SCENE 3 INT MAIN CORRIDOR ANYTIME DAY A 3 SHE IS SURPRISED WHEN SHE COMES OUT INTO THE MAIN SCHOOL CORRIDOR. CONFUSED AND STILL WEARING HER HOSPITAL GOWN, RACHEL WALKS DOWN THE DESERTED CORRIDOR TOWARDS SOME OPEN DOORS. THE LIGHTS ARE TOO BRIGHT, TOO WHITE. SHE IS ALMOST FLOATING NOW - PROPELLED TOWARDS THE DOORS WHICH LEAD... CUT TO: WR4 Episode 1 Lilac Amendments 15 07 08 4. 4 SCENE 4 INT SCHOOL HALL ANYTIME DAY A 4 ...STRAIGHT INTO THE SCHOOL HALL WHICH IS FULL OF PUPILS AND STAFF - ALL FACING THE FRONT. HOWEVER, AS RACHEL DRIFTS DOWN THE CENTRAL AISLE SOME PEOPLE STARE AT HER WITH OBVIOUS HOSTILITY - BOLTON, DAVINA, JANEECE, TOM, MATT ETC.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern San Francisco Bay Ecological Risk Assessment: Potential Crude by Rail Incident Meagan Bowis University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-20-2016 Northern San Francisco Bay Ecological Risk Assessment: Potential Crude by Rail Incident Meagan Bowis University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Bowis, Meagan, "Northern San Francisco Bay Ecological Risk Assessment: Potential Crude by Rail Incident" (2016). Master's Projects and Capstones. 340. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/340 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master’s Project Northern San Francisco Bay Ecological Risk Assessment: Potential Crude by Rail Incident By Meagan Kane Bowis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
    [Show full text]