Stage 1 Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stage 1 Report THE FOREST OF DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-based data collection Project Number 2727 Volume 1 Jon Hoyle Gloucestershire County Council Environment Department Archaeology Service November 2008 © Archaeology Service, Gloucestershire County Council, November 2008 1 Contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................. 27 1.1 Reasons for the project ............................................................................. 27 1.2 Staged approach to the project ................................................................. 28 1.2.1 Stage 1 ..................................................................................................................28 1.2.2 Stage 2 ..................................................................................................................28 1.2.3 Stage 3 ..................................................................................................................28 1.2.4 Stage 4 ..................................................................................................................28 1.3 Related projects......................................................................................... 29 1.3.1 Scowles and Associated Iron Industry Survey .......................................................29 1.3.1.1 Aim of the survey ..............................................................................................29 1.3.1.2 Methodology .....................................................................................................30 1.3.1.3 Outreach ...........................................................................................................30 1.3.2 The National Mapping Programme ........................................................................30 1.3.2.1 Aim of the NMP project .....................................................................................30 1.3.2.2 Methodology .....................................................................................................31 1.3.2.3 Mapping and database .....................................................................................31 1.4 Location of the survey area (Figure 1) ...................................................... 31 1.5 Topography of the survey area (Figure 2)................................................. 32 1.6 Geology of the survey area (Figure 3)....................................................... 35 1.7 Landuse within the survey area................................................................. 38 1.8 Relationship between woodland and solid geology .................................. 40 2 Survey methodology............................................................................... 43 2.1 Checking of existing SMR records ............................................................ 43 2.1.1 Alterations in perceived project methodology.........................................................43 2.1.2 Checking against additional data sets....................................................................43 2.1.3 Standardisation of procedure and maintenance of records of progress.................44 2.2 Systematic collection of data from identified sources ............................... 44 2.2.1 Published and unpublished documentary and map sources..................................44 2.2.2 Information from local individuals or groups...........................................................45 2.2.3 Information from local museum collections ............................................................46 2.3 The project database................................................................................. 46 2.3.1 Recommendations for future use of the SMR ........................................................47 3 Results of Stage 1 of the project ........................................................... 49 3.1 Summary of the results of Stage 1............................................................ 49 3.1.1 Total number of sites .............................................................................................49 3.1.2 Analysis of sites by period .....................................................................................51 3.1.3 Discussion of data sets and analysis .....................................................................53 3.1.4 Sites and Monuments Record data........................................................................54 3.1.4.1 Extraction of information from the SMR ............................................................54 3.1.4.2 Limitations of SMR data for real comparative purposes....................................54 3.1.4.3 Nature of the evidence......................................................................................54 3.2 Analysis of geological, geographical and environmental factors .............. 55 3.2.1 Landuse data .........................................................................................................55 3.2.1.1 Recommendations for improved landuse data..................................................59 3.2.2 Geological data......................................................................................................59 3.2.2.1 Solid geology ....................................................................................................60 3.2.2.2 Drift geology......................................................................................................62 3.2.2.3 Recommendations for improved geological data ..............................................64 3.2.3 Topography............................................................................................................65 3.2.3.1 Height ...............................................................................................................65 3.2.3.2 Aspect...............................................................................................................65 3.2.3.3 Slope.................................................................................................................65 3.2.3.4 General limitations of height slope and aspect data..........................................66 3.2.3.5 Recommendations for improving height slope and aspect data........................66 3.2.3.6 Soils ..................................................................................................................67 3.2.4 Possible future improvement of analysis strategies ...............................................67 4 Discussion of the archaeology within the Forest of Dean Survey area ................................................................................................................... 69 4.1 The Palaeolithic period.............................................................................. 69 4.1.1 Known Palaeolithic sites and artefacts...................................................................69 3 4.1.2 Other evidence for possible Palaeolithic activity ....................................................69 4.1.3 Distribution.............................................................................................................70 4.2 The Mesolithic period ................................................................................ 73 4.2.1 Artefacts of Mesolithic date....................................................................................73 4.2.1.1 Nature of the evidence......................................................................................73 4.2.2 Distribution.............................................................................................................74 4.2.2.1 Discussion of the distribution ............................................................................75 4.3 The Neolithic period................................................................................... 79 4.3.1 Field monuments ...................................................................................................79 4.3.2 Artefacts of Neolithic date ......................................................................................79 4.3.2.1 Nature of the evidence......................................................................................79 4.3.2.2 Other evidence for Neolithic activity..................................................................80 4.3.3 Distribution.............................................................................................................80 4.3.3.1 Discussion of the distribution ............................................................................82 4.4 The Bronze Age......................................................................................... 85 4.4.1 Nature of the evidence: Field monuments .............................................................85 4.4.1.1 Dated evidence of Neolithic and Bronze Age funerary activity..........................85 4.4.1.2 Reported sites...................................................................................................86 4.4.1.3 Undated mounds...............................................................................................86 4.4.1.4 Nature of the evidence......................................................................................88 4.4.1.5 Distribution........................................................................................................88 4.4.1.6 Discussion of the distribution ............................................................................91
Recommended publications
  • Stroud and District U3A Yearbook 2018
    Stroud and District U3A Yearbook 2018 WELCOME TO STROUD AND DISTRICT U3A FROM THE CHAIRMAN We are a self governing organisation working under the umbrella of “The It is with great pleasure Third Age Trust” and established in 1989. We share the common philosophy, that I present you with the aims and objectives of our parent organisation. second edition of the YEAR BOOK. The first in 2015-16 Currently, Stroud and District U3A has over 570 members. As well as interest was well received and we groups, we also hold regular monthly meetings that introduce a range of felt that an updated version speakers of general interest. for existing, new and In the U3A retired or semi-retired people from all walks of life and all ages prospective members would (there is no upper or lower age limit) can meet like-minded people to expand be welcome and useful. their knowledge, share interests and acquire new skills. At present our membership Members can fully involve themselves by organising their own activities in a is approaching 600 a steady wide variety of subjects. and healthy increase year on year. With over 45 There are opportunities to keep your mind and body active, keep interests Groups it is clear that the alive, develop new skills, explore new horizons and meet new people. U3A in Stroud is providing much needed activity, self The current group activities are summarised in the following pages. For more improvement and friendship information, look at our web site: for our members. It helps keep the old grey matter (and other parts) active.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Club September 2020 Bulletin
    DURSLEY BIRDWATCHING AND PRESERVATION SOCIETY SEPTEMBER 2020 BULLETIN Welcome to the September Bulletin which we hope you will enjoy and thank you to all of our members who have helped by sending in articles etc. During the next few month’s which will probably be difficult we shall be looking at the best way to run the Society for your bene- fit. In the meantime, get out on your daily walks and enjoy the birdlife you can find. – MGR. ‘Toad in the Well’. Lockdown eased and we scampered off immediately in our camper van to our favourite location on the edge of Highnam Woods. On arrival we were impressed by the work that the farmer Jeremy had done during the lockdown-improving the campsite to include five hard standings making the site viable for twelve months of the year and allowing visits during the beauty of all seasons. It can be very wet as we know on the forest edge in Gloucestershire, in fact on some occasions the landscape seemed far more suited for planting rice than winter wheat. Down the grassy track from the campsite to the corner of the next field Jeremy had dumped some fifty tons of top soil from the excavations of the hard standing. There had always been a very soggy wet hollow here so the plan is to landfill, level and remove the hollow. Jeremy knew there was a well in the locality dating from eighteen hundreds but on investigating found beautiful clear water thirty foot down so decided to make a feature of it, unfortunately during this investigation and moving of the cover the family heard a loud plop.
    [Show full text]
  • Valued Views Report
    Cammunity One Plan | One Cam | One Voice Submission Version | 2019 Cam Neighbourhood Plan Valued Views Report Cam Parish Council www.camparishcouncil.gov.uk cammunity promoted viewpoints within the landscape or towards it) and representative views (chosen to represent views from a place or routeway) are identified. One Plan | One Cam | One Voice Visual amenity is the overall pleasantness of a view, its setting and value to the community. Introduction Each entry includes a map ID (where accompanying maps show point There are many places both within and outside the Cam Neighbourhood and direction of view), grid reference, short description (giving location Plan area where unique and beautiful views can be enjoyed. Through the description and direction of view), reason for the view, and a photograph. Neighbourhood Plan, identified ‘Valued Views’ are recorded and given extra significance and protection through a planning policy. Methodology Cam has a distinct landscape setting and topography, illustrated in Map 1 Valued views have been identified through a few streams of NDP work. below. The settlement of Cam is situated on low ground shielded on the west A number of key views were initially identified by the Steering Group, by Stinchcombe Hill and Taits Hill, on the south by the Cotswold Hills and on then consulted on in the Cam NDP Questionnaire 2017. This also gave the east by Cam Long Down and Cam Peak, part of the Cotswolds AONB. respondents opportunity to identify any other important views to be considered. This distinct topography means that there are frequent views out of the settlement to the surrounding landscape, and a strong visual connection As part of the Character and Design work, members of the Steering Group to it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Age Tom Moore
    The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Gloucestershire Branch Minutes of AGM Held At
    Butterfly Conservation Gloucestershire Branch Minutes of AGM held at Christchurch Abbeydale, Heron Way, Abbeydale, Gloucester, GL4 5EQ, at 2 pm on Saturday 7th November 2015 Branch Chairman, Sue Smith, welcomed everyone to the meeting. Approximately 53 members were present. 1. Apologies for absence: Rose & Rob Mabbett, Richard Morris, Helen Carver, Andrew Bishop, Simon Barker, Andrew Kerr, Cath Hodsman, Celia Tanner, Nigel Bridges, Jane Rowe, Pat Raddon, Paul Matthews, Martin Matthews, Martin Wright and Mike Bradley. 2. Minutes of the last AGM The minutes from the 2014 AGM were adopted – proposed by Vic Polley, seconded by Pauline Lillico. 3. Matters arising from the 2013 AGM minutes None. 4. Reports from Branch Officers 4.1 Chairman’s Report – Sue Smith (SS) Work has continued much as before on all the reserves, together with recording and general activities within the branch. The garden at Prinknash is still developing and Open Days see people visit from far and wide. The branch funds continue to be in a healthy position. Changes to the composition of the committee continue with the loss of Jo Stafford and Chris Tracey and new members coming on. Thanks were expressed to Chris and Jo for all their efforts. It is planned to reissue the 2008 Walks Booklet in the spring of 2016. Moth and butterfly interest remains high in the county, with moths taking a much higher profile than previously. Members were reminded of the branch website and what they could find there, together with a request for more photos and blogs. They were also reminded also about the winter indoor meetings at Shurdington and Minchinhampton.
    [Show full text]
  • Hope Mansell, Lea Bailey, and Wigpool the White House with Its Distinctive Tower Distance, and Cross a Footbridge and Stile
    Walking Through Dean History Walk Eleven Walk 11 7½ or 5 miles (12 or 8 km) Hope Mansell, Lea Bailey, and Wigpool The white house with its distinctive tower distance, and cross a footbridge and stile. is Euroclydon (1). Continue to the far end Pass to the left of a house (Bailey Brook of the field, where there is a gap and a stile. Cottage) onto a lane and follow this uphill A lovely secluded valley, a gold mine, Wigpool iron mine (including a WW2 Follow the narrow path beyond down to to a junction. Turn right here to follow a ‘cinema’), and extensive views. A hilly walk on field paths, woodland tracks, a tarmac road. Turn left and then right in gravel track just on the edge of a conifer and lanes; can be muddy; the section around Wigpool Common requires front of the first house (‘Greystones’). The plantation (Lea Bailey Inclosure), keeping careful navigation; 9 stiles. path heads uphill, initially between stone left past a driveway. Bear right at a junction walls, to a gate. Keeping the hedge on to go behind two houses (Newtown!), and START at one of the parking areas on either side of the unclassified road your left, continue uphill through another keep left at another to go up a small valley between Drybrook and Mitcheldean, on the sharp bend a little under a gate. Beyond this there is a good view to to a junction of several tracks. Take the mile from Drybrook and just over half a mile from Mitcheldean (the top of the left of Drybrook and Ruardean Hill, one that goes half right past a barrier to a Stenders Hill): GR SO 656180.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOREST of DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-Based Data Collection Project Number 2727
    THE FOREST OF DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-based data collection Project Number 2727 Volume 2 Appendices Jon Hoyle Gloucestershire County Council Environment Department Archaeology Service November 2008 © Archaeology Service, Gloucestershire County Council, November 2008 1 Contents Appendix A Amalgamated solid geology types 11 Appendix B Forest Enterprise historic environment management categories 13 B.i Management Categories 13 B.ii Types of monument to be assigned to each category 16 B.iii Areas where more than one management category can apply 17 Appendix C Sources systematically consulted 19 C.i Journals and periodicals and gazetteers 19 C.ii Books, documents and articles 20 C.iii Map sources 22 C.iv Sources not consulted, or not systematically searched 25 Appendix D Specifications for data collection from selected source works 29 D.i 19th Century Parish maps: 29 D.ii SMR checking by Parish 29 D.iii New data gathering by Parish 29 D.iv Types of data to be taken from Parish maps 29 D.v 1608 map of the western part of the Forest of Dean: Source Works 1 & 2919 35 D.vi Other early maps sources 35 D.vii The Victoria History of the County of Gloucester: Source Works 3710 and 894 36 D.viii Listed buildings information: 40 D.ix NMR Long Listings: Source ;Work 4249 41 D.x Coleford – The History of a West Gloucestershire Town, Hart C, 1983, Source Work 824 41 D.xi Riverine Dean, Putley J, 1999: Source Work 5944 42 D.xii Other text-based sources 42 Appendix E Specifications for checking or adding certain types of
    [Show full text]
  • River Wye SSSI Restoration Technical Report Finaldraftforconsultation
    River Wye SSSI Restoration Technical Report –Draft for Comment Issued for comment January 2015 River Wye SSSI Restoration Technical Report_FinalDraftForConsultation Executive summary Jacobs was commissioned by the Environment Agency to produce separate Technical Reports for the restoration of the Lower Wye and River Lugg. In addition, Management Reports to complement each Technical Report were also produced by Jacobs. This is a Technical Report on the geomorphological assessment of the Lower Wye. The Lower River Wye and is a designated Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and a Special Area of Conservation (SAC). The river is designated due to the presence of grayling, freshwater pearl mussel, white-clawed crayfish, shad, otter, salmon, bullhead, lamprey, various invertebrate assemblages and water-crowfoot communities. The Upper and Middle Wye are also designated, however those reaches lie within Wales and were not investigated for this Technical Report. Reports for the Upper and Middle Wye will be produced separately by Natural Resources Wales (NRW). A combination of all reports will provide a catchment wide restoration strategy for all the SACs and SSSIs in the River Wye catchment. The Lower Wye mainly flows through England; however there is a section around Monmouth that is entirely within Wales. Here the right bank of the river is generally regulated by NRW, whilst the left bank is regulated by Natural England and the Environment Agency. Natural England has subdivided the Lower Wye SSSI into seven management units, six of which are assessed to be in ‘unfavourable condition’. This report is required to assess the current geomorphological condition and pressures on the Lower Wye to inform a Management Report that will provide suggestions to help achieve favourable condition in each of the management units.
    [Show full text]
  • Grwalks Gloucestershire
    GRWalks Gloucestershire Available each March, July and November Ramblers’ Walks Visitors are very welcome to come on up to three March to June 2014 walks listed here before deciding whether they wish to join the Ramblers. DOGS Except for Forest of Dean Group (see below) Only Registered Assistance Dogs are allowed. GRWalks combines full walk details of all the nine Cirencester Group Meet at The Waterloo CP - SP 026021 to Ramblers' groups active in Gloucestershire. One of the share transport. For day walks bring a packed lunch unless advantages of becoming a member of the Ramblers is that you otherwise indicated. See the programme at can walk with any group in Britain at any time. www.ramblers.co.uk/programmes/online.php?group=GR01 IMPORTANT LATE CHANGES will be shown on the www.cirencesterramblers.btck.co.uk link for GRWalks Updates on the Walks Page www.gloucestershireramblers.org.uk/grwalks – do check Cleeve Group Walks start at map reference. See www.ramblers.co.uk/programmes/online.php?group=GR05 or ring the leader if you are not on computer - before travelling. www.cleeveramblers.org.uk Online users can click the top links opposite to look at a group's walks. Click on the title of a walk you are interested in Forest of Dean Group These walks start at the map and scroll down to see an interactive map. We hope lots of reference. Walks may have well-behaved dogs with walkers will be able to see this programme uploaded at permission from leader in advance. See the programme at www.gloucestershireramblers.org.uk/grwalks www.ramblers.co.uk/programmes/online.php?group=GR02 www.fodramblers.org.uk If you need a printed copy of GRWalks write to the editor Mike Garner (GRWalks), Southcot, The Headlands, Gloucester Group Meet centrally at one of two sites as Stroud GL5 5PS.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Assemblages on English Sssis English Nature Research Reports
    Report Number 618 Invertebrate assemblages on English SSSIs English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 618 Invertebrate assemblages on English SSSIs Keith N. A. Alexander, C. Martin Drake, Derek A. Lott and Jonathan R. Webb 2004 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Acknowledgements Mike Edwards contributed to early discussion. Summary 1. Data from English Nature’s Invertebrate Site Register, SSSI citations and the English Nature Site Information System (ENSIS) were used to identify assemblages of invertebrates on SSSI for which invertebrate interest had been recognised in the citations or ENSIS. 2. Assemblages were defined using predominantly well recognised habitat terms. These terms were organised into a hierarchy of three levels. A total of 133 terms were used at the second and third levels, and the number of assemblages recognised exceeds this when the terms were used in combinations. The importance of assemblages was assessed as national / international, regional or county / local. 3. Of the 1028 sites investigated, 885 had sufficient data to allow at least one assemblage to be identified. The average number of assemblages per site was 3.1, ranging from 1 to 10. 4. Assemblages with a high representation in the results were those associated with grasslands, mature woodland, fen and marsh (the latter two mainly represented in features such as ponds and ditches). A few assemblages appeared to be particularly poorly represented, notably shingle and dune assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Newsletter June 2019
    South Cotswold Ramblers’ Group Newsletter - June 2019 Published each year in February, June and October. We look forward to hearing from you with stories, opinions, photos, poetry, art, funny tales, cartoons, appeals, you name it. This edition was edited by Sally 01453 872729, email: [email protected] CHAIRMAN’S REPORT Another Chair’s report. What’s it to be this time? Forget the inspirational diatribes or the doom and gloom. I think just a few thank yous. Last week I was lined up to do a Thursday evening walk and a 12 mile Saturday walk. Unfortunately, at the last minute I couldn’t do either. So thanks to Tim who stepped in on Thursday and to Jill and Sue who just happened to have a walk up their sleeves to replace my Saturday walk. We do get the occasional emergency and it’s nice to find that there are people in South Cots who are willing to step in and help out. Don’t leave it to the same people to step in every time. Thanks as always to Mike and his team of collectors and collators for putting together the latest walks programme. Fifty four walks, plenty of variety and something to suit everybody. We often seem to struggle to find leaders for the last couple of walks. It would be nice if they could be snapped up quickly. Are there more potential Monday walks leaders out there? We could possibly think of putting on more walks but we would need to be sure that we could obtain leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • 786 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    786 bus time schedule & line map 786 Parkend - Bream - Lydney - Gloucester View In Website Mode The 786 bus line (Parkend - Bream - Lydney - Gloucester) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Gloucester: 9:10 AM (2) Parkend: 1:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 786 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 786 bus arriving. Direction: Gloucester 786 bus Time Schedule 95 stops Gloucester Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday Not Operational The Barracks, Parkend Tuesday Not Operational Woodland Road, Parkend Wednesday Not Operational The Green, Parkend Thursday 9:10 AM New Road, West Dean Civil Parish Friday Not Operational Garage, Parkend Saturday Not Operational The Fountain, Parkend Whitemead Park, Parkend Nagshead Nature Reserve, Parkend 786 bus Info Direction: Gloucester Arthur's Folly, Parkend Stops: 95 Trip Duration: 78 min Smiths Hill, Fetter Hill Line Summary: The Barracks, Parkend, Woodland Road, Parkend, The Green, Parkend, Garage, Parkend, The Fountain, Parkend, Whitemead Park, Ellwood Cross, Ellwood Parkend, Nagshead Nature Reserve, Parkend, Clements End Road, West Dean Civil Parish Arthur's Folly, Parkend, Smiths Hill, Fetter Hill, Ellwood Cross, Ellwood, Marsh Way, Sling, Montague Marsh Way, Sling Inn, Sling, Bronllys, Clements End, Elwall Farm Turn, Clements End, Oakwood Mill, Bream, Sun Rise Road, Montague Inn, Sling Bream, School, Bream, Community Centre, Bream, Hang Hill Road, Bream, Bowson Square, Bream, Bronllys, Clements End Bowson Road Junction,
    [Show full text]