DOCSLIB.ORG

High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area Report |

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | LA13 LA13: Ravenfield to Clayton High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H24 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report LA13: Ravenfield to Clayton H24 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identifi ed any third- party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fi bre. High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA13 Contents Preface v Structure of the HS2 Phase 2b working draft Environmental Statement vi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction to HS2 1 1.2 Purpose and status of this report 3 1.3 Structure of this report 3 2 Overview of the area and description of the Proposed Scheme 6 2.1 Overview of the area 6 2.2 Description of the Proposed Scheme 11 2.3 Construction of the Proposed Scheme 30 2.4 Operation of the Proposed Scheme 61 2.5 Route section alternatives 62 3 Stakeholder engagement and consultation 66 3.1 Introduction 66 3.2 Key stages of Phase 2b engagement and consultation 66 3.3 Informing the Proposed Scheme 67 3.4 Engagement and consultation with stakeholder groups 68 4 Agriculture, forestry and soils 74 4.1 Introduction 74 4.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 74 4.3 Environmental baseline 75 4.4 Effects arising during construction 83 4.5 Effects arising from operation 93 5 Air quality 95 5.1 Introduction 95 5.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 95 5.3 Environmental baseline 96 5.4 Effects arising during construction 97 i High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA13 5.5 Effects arising from operation 99 6 Community 101 6.1 Introduction 101 6.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 101 6.3 Environmental baseline 102 6.4 Effects arising during construction 107 6.5 Effects arising from operation 111 7 Ecology and biodiversity 113 7.1 Introduction 113 7.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 113 7.3 Environmental baseline 113 7.4 Effects arising during construction 122 7.5 Effects arising during operation 134 8 Health 136 8.1 Introduction 136 8.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 136 8.3 Environmental baseline 137 8.4 Effects arising during construction 140 8.5 Effects arising from operation 146 9 Historic environment 148 9.1 Introduction 148 9.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 148 9.3 Environmental baseline 150 9.4 Effects arising during construction 156 9.5 Effects arising from operation 162 10 Land quality 164 10.1 Introduction 164 10.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 164 10.3 Environmental baseline 165 10.4 Effects arising during construction 178 10.5 Effects arising from operation 186 11 Landscape and visual 188 11.1 Introduction 188 11.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 188 11.3 Environmental baseline 190 11.4 Temporary effects arising during construction 204 11.5 Permanent effects arising from operation 215 12 Socio-economics 231 12.1 Introduction 231 12.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 231 ii High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA13 12.3 Environmental baseline 231 12.4 Effects arising during construction 234 12.5 Effects arising from operation 238 13 Sound, noise and vibration 240 13.1 Introduction 240 13.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 241 13.3 Environmental baseline 241 13.4 Effects arising during construction 242 13.5 Effects arising from operation 245 14 Traffic and transport 250 14.1 Introduction 250 14.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 250 14.3 Environmental baseline 251 14.4 Effects arising during construction 253 14.5 Effects arising from operation 261 15 Water resources and flood risk 266 15.1 Introduction 266 15.2 Scope, assumptions and limitations 266 15.3 Environmental baseline 267 15.4 Effects arising during construction 281 15.5 Effects arising from operation 291 16 References 293 List of figures Figure 1: Structure of the working draft Environmental Statement ix Figure 2: The HS2 Phase 2b route and community areas 2 Figure 3: Community area context map 7 Figure 4: Key permanent features of route of the Proposed Scheme in the Ravenfield to Clayton area 13 Figure 5: Location of construction compounds in the Ravenfield to Clayton area 34 Figure 6: Construction compounds for civil engineering works 36 Figure 7: Construction compounds for railway systems installation works 37 Figure 8: Indicative construction programme between 2023 and 2033 55 Figure 9: Business sector composition in RMBC and DMBC areas and the Yorkshire and the Humber Region 232 Figure 10: Employment by industrial sector in the RMBC and DMBC areas and the Yorkshire and the Humber Region. 233 iii High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA13 List of tables Table 1: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Hooton Roberts cutting main compound 38 Table 2: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Old Denaby embankment satellite compound 41 Table 3: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the River Don viaduct satellite compound* 42 Table 4: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Barnburgh embankment satellite compound 45 Table 5: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Thurnscoe embankment satellite compound 48 Table 6: Demolitions required as a result of the works to be managed from the Clayton cutting satellite compound 49 Table 7: Consideration of local alternatives for Sheffield Northern spur 63 Table 8: Mechanisms and timeline of stakeholder engagement since route announcement 66 Table 9: Engagement to date with community stakeholders 69 Table 10: Engagement to date with local authorities and parish councils 70 Table 11: Summary of characteristics of holdings 82 Table 12: Summary of temporary effects on holdings from construction 87 Table 13: Summary of permanent effects on holdings from construction 90 Table 14: Species potentially relevant to the assessment within the Ravenfield to Clayton area 120 Table 15: Residual significant effects on ecological resources/features during construction 131 Table 16: Residual significant effects on ecological resources/features during operation 135 Table 17: Summary of the geology underlying the land quality study area 166 Table 18: Current and historical landfill sites located in the study area 170 Table 19: Current and historical mining and mineral sites and colliery spoil sites located in the study area 171 Table 20: Current and historical industrial sites located in the study area 172 Table 21: Summary of sensitive receptors 177 Table 22: Summary of baseline CSM for sites which may pose a contaminative risk for the Proposed Scheme 180 Table 23: Summary of construction CSM effects. 182 Table 24: Summary of effects for mining and mineral resources 185 Table 25: Summary of effects for mining and mineral resources 186 Table 26: Summary of significantly affected LCAs 193 Table 27: Summary description and assessment of effects on LCAs 205 Table 28: Construction phase potentially significant effects 209 Table 29: Operation phase significant landscape effects 216 Table 30: Operation phase significant visual effects 219 Table 31: Resources which would potentially experience significant direct effects 236 Table 32: Significance of effects on resources 237 Table 33: Surface water body receptors 268 Table 34: Summary of geology and hydrogeology in the study area 272 Table 35: River flood risk sources and receptors 277 Table 36: Surface water flood risk sources and receptors 278 iv High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: LA13 Preface The working draft Environmental Statement This report forms part of Volume 2 of the working draft Environmental Statement (ES) for Phase 2b of High Speed Two (HS2). The purpose of the working draft ES is to provide the public and other stakeholders with an opportunity to review and comment on preliminary environmental information for Phase 2b of HS2, which is based on a stage in the ongoing design development and environmental assessment process.
Recommended publications
  • 978–1–137–49934–9 Copyrighted Material – 978–1–137–49934–9

    978–1–137–49934–9 Copyrighted Material – 978–1–137–49934–9

    Copyrighted material – 978–1–137–49934–9 © Steve Ely 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–1–137–49934–9 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
  • Dearne Valley Landscape Partnership Environmental and Biodiversity Review

    Dearne Valley Landscape Partnership Environmental and Biodiversity Review

    Dearne Valley Landscape Partnership Environmental and Biodiversity Review CONSULTATION VERSION 23rd October 2013 Prepared by Louise Hill MA, DipLD MRB Ecology and Environment 206 Thorne Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN2 5AF Tel 01302 322956 [email protected] www.mrbecology.co.uk 1 INTRODUCTION 3 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SOURCES Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Landscape Partnership Development Officer appointed Louise Hill of MRB Ecology and Environment to undertake a review of existing information on the An analysis of data availability was undertaken. In this initial task the type and supplier of data biodiversity of the Dearne Valley in order to prepare a strategy for achieving the environmental and available have been identified. These sources of data were identified from conversations and biodiversity aims of the Dearne Valley Landscape Partnership (DVLP). correspondence with a number of local biological record centre (LRC) staff, Yorkshire and the Humber Ecological Data Network (YHEDN) staff, Local Authority Biodiversity Officers and amateur The following key goals have been identified from Partnership documentation: naturalists and geologists. Additional information comes from experience of working as an ecologist in the South Yorkshire area for over 15 years and via the author's active role as President of one of 1) Protecting existing environmental assets – In a better condition the local amateur naturalist societies. Further information such as the format in which data are held and whether there are existing data-sharing agreements between the data provider and the DVLP 2) Maintaining existing environmental assets – Better managed has been provided, where known. 3) Improving Knowledge about Existing Assets - Better identified and recorded The results of this data availability review are presented in Table 1.
  • Candidates Yorkshire Region

    Candidates Yorkshire Region

    Page | 1 LIBERAL/LIBERAL DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES IN THE YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE REGION 1945-2015 Constituencies in the county of Yorkshire (excluding Cleveland and Teesside) INCLUDING SDP CANDIDATES in the GENERAL ELECTIONS of 1983 and 1987 PREFACE A number of difficulties have been encountered in compiling this Index which have not been resolved in an entirely satisfactory manner. Local government boundary changes in the early 1970s led to the creation of the Cleveland and HuMberside Counties. Cleveland and adjacent constituencies have been included in the Index for the North East Region. HuMberside constituencies coMMencing with the General Election of February 1974 are included in the Yorkshire Region. The region has been home to an impressive gallery of party personalities, several of whoM receive extended entries. The spirited independence with respect to LPO HQ in London which the Yorkshire Regional Party has often shown, and the relatively strong direction it has exerted over its constituency associations, would account for the formidable challenge maintained in the Region at successive general elections, even in the direst years of party fortunes. Yorkshire appears to have been rather less willing in 1950 to heed to the dictates of the Martell Plan (see article below) than other regions. Even so, until the 1970s there were several Labour-held Mining and industrial constituencies where the Party declined to fight. InforMation on Many candidates reMains sparse. SDP candidates particularly, over 1983-87, seem to have been an anonyMous battalion indeed, few if any of them leaving a Mark on any field of huMan endeavour. 1 Page | 2 THE MARTELL PLAN The Martell Plan, mentioned in passing throughout the regional directories was the electoral strategy adopted by the Liberal Party for the General Election of 1950.
  • Local Environment Agency Plan

    Local Environment Agency Plan

    EA-NORTH EAST LEAPs local environment agency plan SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE CONSULTATION REPORT AUGUST 1997 BEVERLEY LEEDS HULL V WAKEFIELD ■ E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y Information Services Unit Please return or renew this item by the due date Due Date E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y YOUR VIEW S Welcome to the Consultation Report for the South Yorkshire and North East Derbyshire area which is the Agency's view of the state of the environment and the issues that we believe need to be addressed during the next five years. We should like to hear your views: • Have we identified all the major issues? • Have we identified realistic proposals for action? • Do you have any comments to make regarding the plan in general? During the consultation period for this report the Agency would be pleased to receive any comments in writing to: The Environment Planner South Yorkshire and North East Derbyshire LEAP The Environment Agency Olympia House Gelderd Road Leeds LSI 2 6DD All comments must be received by 31st December 1997. All comments received on the Consultation Report will be considered in preparing the next phase, the Action Plan. This Action Plan will focus on updating Section 4 of this Consultation Report by turning the proposals into actions with timescales and costs where appropriate. All written responses will be considered to be in the public domain unless consultees explicitly request otherwise. Note: Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information in this report it may contain some errors or omissions which we shall be pleased to note.
  • Settlement Profiles

    Settlement Profiles

    Settlement Profiles Local Plan Evidence Base www.doncaster.gov.uk Doncaster Settlement Profiles 1.1. As part of the emerging Local Plan, a Settlement Audit was undertaken in 2014 to better understand the service provision across the borough, which in turn helped to determine the Local Plan Settlement Hierarchy. This process is dealt with at length in both the Settlement Audit and the Settlement Background Paper. 1.2. However, some consultation responses to the Settlement Audit and the Homes and Settlements consultation intimated that the Settlement Audit could be further expanded on and clarified. 1.3. As such, the following profiles have been developed which seeks to provide portraits of each defined settlement within the borough (the Main Urban Area; 7 Main Towns; 10 Service Towns and Villages; and 12 Defined Villages). 1.4. Each portrait will expand on the results of the Settlement Audit, and will provide ‘profiles’ for each settlement, dealing with social, economic and environmental matters, as per the Settlement Audit. 1.5. Occasionally, some scores or information published in the Settlement Audit Update (2017) have been amended. These amendments and the rationale are presented overleaf in Table A. 1.6. Information about the Settlement Hierarchy and allocations within each settlement are provided in the Settlement Background Paper and Site Selection Methodology. For convenience, a number of abridged settlement profiles have also been provided in the Settlement Housing Summaries. 1 Settlement Amendment Rationale Change to Scores? Auckley – Settlement scores merged Settlement made up of two Scores now reflect the combined settlement proposed Hayfield Community Profile Areas so in the Settlement Hierarchy.
  • B I B L I O G R a P H Y

    B I B L I O G R a P H Y

    B I B L I O G R A P H Y Abbreviations are made according to the Council for British Archaeology’s Standard List of Abbreviated Titles of Current Series as at April 1991. Titles not covered in this list are abbreviated according to British Standard BS 4148:1985, with some minor exceptions. (––––), 1848. ‘Ancient crosses’, Ecclesiologist, n. ser., VIII, (––––), 1984. Review of Ryder 1982, Bull. C.B.A. Churches 220–39 Committee, XX, 15–16 (––––), 1854. Review of Wardell 1853, in ‘Historical and (––––), 1991. Historic Churches of West Yorkshire: Tong Church, miscellaneous reviews’, Gentleman’s Magazine, n. ser., XLII, West Yorkshire Archaeology Service leaflet (Wakefield) pt. 2, 44–6 (––––), 1865. ‘Archaeological Institute’, Builder, XXIII Adams, M., 1996. ‘Excavation of a pre-Conquest cemetery (15 July 1865), 502 at Addingham, West Yorkshire’, Medieval Archaeol., XL, (––––), 1867. ‘The Huddersfield Archaeological and 151–91 Topgraphical Association: Walton Cross’, Huddersfield Adcock, G. A., 1974. ‘A study of the types of interlace on Examiner, 14 September 1867, 6 Northumbrian sculpture’ (Unpublished M.Phil. thesis, (––––), 1871a. ‘Church-building news’, Builder, XXIX 2 vols., University of Durham) (28 October 1871), 852–3 Adcock, G. A., 2002. ‘Interlaced animal design in Bernician (––––), 1871b. ‘Report of the Council ... Feb. 7th, 1871’, in stone sculpture examined in the light of the design concepts Yorkshire Philosophical Society, Annual Report for in the Lindisfarne Gospels’ (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 3 vols., University of Durham) MDCCCLXX (York), 7–17 Addy, S. O., 1893. The Hall of Waltheof (London and Sheffield) (––––), 1871c. ‘Donations to the Museum’, in Yorkshire Aitkenhead, N., Barclay, W.
  • Display PDF in Separate

    Display PDF in Separate

    E k s r r C&AP* S o x localrenvironment agency plan SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE AUGUST 1998 BEVERLEY LEEDS HULL WAKEFIELD ■ SH EFFIELD SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE AREA ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES ( UAKEFIELD) M S r RIDING OF YORKSHIRE (KIRKLEES") BARNSLEY DOWCAST! ( DONCASTER ) ( ROTHERHAM ) < (DERBYSHIRE DALES') CHESTERFIELD !f ( BOLSOVER ) ---------CATCHMENT BOUNDARY RIVER ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY MAIN ROAD NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 094859 KEY DETAILS General Water Quality: Length of watercourse(km) in each component of the Area 1849 knr General Quality Assessment (1996) Key Local Barnsley MBC j Authorities Chesterfield DC A Good 5.6 km Doncaster MBC B 133.2 km North East Derbyshire DC C Fair 179.6 km Rotherham MBC D 198.2 km Sheffield City Council E Poor 178.3 km F Bad 36.3 km Other Ixxral East Riding of Yorkshire Unclassified 53 km Authorities Bolsover KirkJees Selby Wakefield Pollution Prevention and Control Population 1.4 million Licensed Sites: Total 350 Landfill sites 95 Transfer stations 106 Scrapyards/vchical dismantlers 114 Civic amenity sites 22 1 Water Resources Treatment plants 8 Storage facilities 5 Average annual rainfall: Incinerators 1 Red mi res 1090mm South Emsall 644mm Facilities claiming exemption 778 (inc exempt scrapyards) Total licensed abstraction 210.2 million m3/year Registered waste carriers 1531 (South Yorkshire only) Mean river flow @ Doncaster Special waste movements 38 000 Summer 691 million (1 May 97 ■ 30 April 98) litres/day Consented Discharges to water: Winter 2419 million Sewage 967 litres/day Trade 331 Number of Abstraction 381 Licences: (Surface andGroundwater) E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y Flood Defence NATIONAL LIBRARY & Length of main river 271 km INFORMATION SERVICE Number of people and 20516 house property protected from equivalents NORTH EAST REGION flooding Tyneside House, Skinnerburn Road.
  • + Diocese of Sheffield DAC Guidance Notes

    + Diocese of Sheffield DAC Guidance Notes

    +Diocese of Sheffield DAC Guidance Notes List of Approved Architects and Surveyors 2013- 2017 Updated February 2015 1 List of Approved QI Architects & Surveyors 2013- 2017 2 Quinquennial Inspections (QI) PCCs are required to commission a full inspection of the church building and its curtilage once every five years. This is a statutory requirement under The Inspection of Churches Measure 1955 (Quinquennial Inspections) Care of Churches and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1991. Under the Measure, only those architects and surveyors approved by the DAC can undertake the Quinquennial Inspection of a church. In order to fulfil their responsibilities under the Measure, PCCs who fail in their duty in this regard may find that the Archdeacon will commission an inspection for which the PCC will have to pay. The importance of regular inspections by architects and surveyors who specialise in the conservation and repair of historic buildings cannot be over-emphasised. Historic and 'traditional' structures deteriorate in a manner that is very different from modern buildings and it takes a specialist to identify correctly defects that require attention from the superficial results of the ageing process. The five yearly QI report is one of the most important tools for the church in understanding and maintaining the fabric of its building. A QI report should include a list of recommended works in order of urgency, most of which will require a detailed specification and schedule to be submitted as a faculty application prior to the work being carried out. If your QI report does not include such a list, please refer your Church Inspector to the template available on the diocesan website that sets out the required content of a QI report.
  • Asda Tour De Yorkshire Women's Race

    Asda Tour De Yorkshire Women's Race

    ASDA TOUR DE YORKSHIRE WOMEN’S RACE 3-4 MAY 2018 Thursday May 3rd 132.5km 1 BEVERLEY ILKLEY Friday May 4th 124km 2 BARNSLEY DONCASTER Race start Race finish Start town Finish town 15 km 0 m 250 m 200 m 150 m 100 m 50 m Hollym Hollym A1033 3.5km Cleethorpes Cleethorpes Withernsea A1031 A160 GRIMSBY A16 Patrington Patrington Roos Roos Sea Ottringham Ottringham Sunk Island Sunk Island Waltham Waltham North Aldbrough Aldbrough B1242 Burton Pidsea Burton Pidsea A180 Brigsley Brigsley Humbleton Humbleton Mappleton Mappleton Burstwick Burstwick A18 LINCS Keyingham Laceby Laceby Hornsea East East Stallingborough Stallingborough Healing Healing Atwick Atwick Withernwick Withernwick r e NORTH EAST Hedon Hedon Great Hatfield Preston Preston Ravendale Ravendale b A18 A1173 A180 Great Coates Great Coates A1033 m B1242 u A1173 Skipsea Skipsea H Barmston Barmston Paull Paull Immingham r Immingham A1035 v e A18 Sproatley Sproatley Swallow i Swallow Bilton Bilton South Killingholme R South Killingholme A165 A46 Beeford Beeford Brocklesby Brocklesby Bewholme Bewholme A1173 Keelby Keelby A160 Brandesburton Brandesburton Sigglesthorne A165 Great Great Limber Limber A165 A165 Foston-on- the-Wolds Foston-on- the-Wolds A18 Goxhill Goxhill Kirmington Kirmington Ulceby Wawne Wawne Caistor Caistor A1084 Thornton Curtis Thornton Curtis Leven Leven l A180 B1249 ul H Burshill Burshill Routh Routh Wansford Wansford A1077 HULL HULL H BEVERLEY l A1035 ul A63 Grasby Grasby Barnetby- le-wold Barnetby- le-wold A1174 Arram 5 North Kelsey Moor North Kelsey Moor South Kelsey
  • Publicity Material List

    Publicity Material List

    Early Guides and Publicity Material Inventory Type Company Title Author Date Notes Location No. Guidebook Cambrian Railway Tours in Wales c 1900 Front cover not there 2000-7019 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook Furness Railway The English Lakeland 1911 2000-7027 ALS5/49/A/1 Travel Guide Cambrian & Mid-Wales Railway Gossiping Guide to Wales 1870 1999-7701 ALS5/49/A/1 The English Lakeland: the Paradise of Travel Guide Furness Railway 1916 1999-7700 ALS5/49/A/1 Tourists Guidebook Furness Railway Illustrated Guide Golding, F 1905 2000-7032 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook North Staffordshire Railway Waterhouses and the Manifold Valley 1906 Card bookmark 2001-7197 ALS5/49/A/1 The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Inscribed "To Aman Mosley"; signature of Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1908 1999-8072 ALS5/29/A/1 Staffordshire Railway chairman of NSR The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Moores, Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1891 1999-8083 ALS5/49/A/1 Staffordshire Railway George Travel Guide Maryport & Carlisle Railway The Borough Guides: No 522 1911 1999-7712 ALS5/29/A/1 Travel Guide London & North Western Railway Programme of Tours in North Wales 1883 1999-7711 ALS5/29/A/1 Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7680 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7681 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales,
  • List of Licensed Organisations PDF Created: 29 09 2021

    List of Licensed Organisations PDF Created: 29 09 2021

    PAF Licensing Centre PAF® Public Sector Licensees: List of licensed organisations PDF created: 29 09 2021 Licence no. Organisation names Application Confirmed PSL 05710 (Bucks) Nash Parish Council 22 | 10 | 2019 PSL 05419 (Shrop) Nash Parish Council 12 | 11 | 2019 PSL 05407 Ab Kettleby Parish Council 15 | 02 | 2018 PSL 05474 Abberley Parish Council 06 | 08 | 2018 PSL 01030 Abbey Hill Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01031 Abbeydore & Bacton Group Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01032 Abbots Langley Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01033 Abbots Leigh Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 03449 Abbotskerswell Parish Council 23 | 04 | 2014 PSL 06255 Abbotts Ann Parish Council 06 | 07 | 2021 PSL 01034 Abdon & Heath Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 00040 Aberdeen City Council 03 | 04 | 2014 PSL 00029 Aberdeenshire Council 31 | 03 | 2014 PSL 01035 Aberford & District Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01036 Abergele Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04909 Aberlemno Community Council 25 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04892 Abermule with llandyssil Community Council 11 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04315 Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board 24 | 02 | 2016 PSL 01037 Aberystwyth Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 01038 Abingdon Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 03548 Above Derwent Parish Council 20 | 03 | 2015 PSL 05197 Acaster Malbis Parish Council 23 | 10 | 2017 PSL 04423 Ackworth Parish Council 21 | 10 | 2015 PSL 01039 Acle Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 05515 Active Dorset 08 | 10 | 2018 PSL 05067 Active Essex 12 | 05 | 2017 PSL 05071 Active Lincolnshire 12 | 05
  • Rotherham Borough Council – Report to Members

    Rotherham Borough Council – Report to Members

    ROTHERHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL – REPORT TO MEMBERS 1. Meeting: Economic Development Planning and Transportation Matters. 2. Date: 21st September 2009 3. Title: Objections to the Proposed Traffic Regulation Order to Correct the Clerical Error in the One-Way TRO for Main Street, Bramley. 4. Directorate: Environment and Development Services 5. Summary To report on the objections to and comments on the proposed South Yorkshire County Council (Various Roads Bramley and Wickersley) (Traffic Measures Consolidation) (Amendment) Order 2009 (“the 2009 TRO”), the purpose of which is to correct the clerical error in the South Yorkshire County Council (Various Roads Bramley and Wickersley) (Traffic Measures Consolidation) Order 1980 (as amended) (“the 1980 TRO”). 6. Recommendations It is recommended that: i) the objections relating to the proposal to correct the clerical error in the South Yorkshire County Council (Various Roads Bramley and Wickersley) (Traffic Measures Consolidation) Order 1980 (as amended) be not acceded to; ii) the Assistant Chief Executive (Legal and Democratic Services) be authorised to make The South Yorkshire County Council (Various Roads Bramley and Wickersley) (Traffic Measures Consolidation) (Amendment) Order 2009 and that the 2009 Order be implemented; and iii) the objectors and lead petitioner be informed of the decision and the reasons for it. 7. Proposals and Details 7.1 Background In June 2008 a clerical error was discovered in the 1980 TRO. In column 2 of Schedule 3A, the traffic flow along the one-way system on Main Street, Bramley, from its junction with Church Lane to its junction with Cross Street, is described as from east to west whereas traffic actually flows from west to east.