DOCSLIB.ORG

Sheffield, Doncaster, Bassetlaw

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sheffield, Doncaster, Bassetlaw LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF SOUTH YORKSHIRE THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF ROTHERHAM Boundaries with: SHEFFIELD DONCASTER BASSETLAW BOLSOVER N. E. DERBYSHIRE BARNSLEY DONCASTER SHEFFIELD \ ^ ? BASSETLAW N. E. DERBYSHIRE BOLSOVER REPORT NO. 670 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 670 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr K F J Ennals CB MEMBERS Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr C W Smith Professor K Young THE RT HON MICHAEL HOWARD QC MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF SOUTH YORKSHIRE THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF ROTHERHAM AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH THE CITY OF SHEFFIELD, THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF DONCASTER, THE DISTRICT OF BASSETLAW IN NOTTINGHAMSHIRE AND THE DISTRICTS OF 'BOLSOVER AND NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE IN DERBYSHIRE ,THE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION i 1 . This report contains our final proposals for the Metropolitan Borough of Rotherham's boundaries with the City of Sheffield, the 'Metropolitan Borough of Doncaster, the District of Bassetlaw in Nottinghamshire, and the Districts of Bolsover and North East Derbyshire in Derbyshire. We are not suggesting any radical 'changes but are making a number of minor proposals to make the Boundary more clearly identifiable and to remove anomalies. Our Recommendations in respect of Rotherham's boundary with Barnsley are contained in our earlier report No. 601. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE START OF THE REVIEW i 2. On 1 September 1987 we wrote to Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of Rotherham as part of the Mandatory Review of South Yorkshire and the districts within it under Section 48(1) of the Local iGovernment Act 1972, i 3. Copies of our letter were sent to the adjoining Metropolitan Boroughs; to the county and district councils bordering the metropolitan area; to parish councils in Rotherham and the adjoining districts; to the local authority associations; to i Members of Parliament with constituency interests; to the headquarters of the main political parties; to the local press, television and radio stations; and to a number of other interested persons and organisations. 4. To enable the Commission to fulfil its obligations under Section 60(1) of the Local Government Act 1972, the Metropolitan Boroughs were requested, in co-operation as necessary with other local authorities, to insert a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers to give wide publicity to the start of the review in the area concerned. 5. A period of seven months from the date of our letter was allowed for all local authorities, including those in the surrounding counties, and any person or body interested in the review, to send us their detailed views on whether changes to Rotherham1s boundaries were desirable; and if so, what those changes should be and how they would best meet the criterion of effective and convenient local government as prescribed by section 47(1) of the Act. THE SUBMISSIONS MADE TO OS 6. In response to our letter of 1 September 1987 we received representations from Rotherham MBC and the other local authorities concerned, together with representations from a number of local businesses and approximately one hundred and fifty individuals. ANNOUNCEMENT OF OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS/INTERIM DECISIONS 7. After considering these representations, we published a consultation letter on 8 August 1989 announcing our draft proposals and interim decisions for Rotherham. Copies were sent to the authorities concerned and to all those who had made representations to us. The assistance of the relevant councils was sought in giving publicity to our draft proposals. Comments were invited by 13 October 1989. RESPONSE TO OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS/INTERIM DECISIONS 8. In response to our letter of 8 August 1989, we received representations from Rotherham and Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Councils, Sheffield City Council, Derbyshire County Council, the District Councils of Bassetlaw, Bolsover and North East Derbyshire, the Parish Councils of Barlborough, Braithwell, iConisborough Parks, Harthill with Woodall, Orgreave, Ravenfield and Stainton; several local organisations, including the Tinsley Forum; and a number of local residents. i ANNOUNCEMENT OF OUR FURTHER DRAFT PROPOSALS i 9. After considering these representations, we decided to issue further draft proposals in respect of Rotherham's boundaries with Bolsover and Sheffield. The letter announcing our further draft proposals was published on 3 March 1992. Copies were sent to the local authorities concerned, asking them to place the further draft proposals on display, and to other interested organisations and persons who had made representations to us or who had expressed an interest. Comments were invited by 28 April 1992. RESPONSE TO OUR FURTHER DRAFT PROPOSALS 10. In response to our further draft proposals, we received comments from Rotherham and Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Councils, Sheffield City Council, Derbyshire County Council, the District Councils of North East Derbyshire and Bassetlaw, the Parish Councils of Braithwell, Harthill with Woodall and Orgreave, the Tinsley Forum, the Head Teacher of Park House School, South Yorkshire Police and eight local residents. i 11. As required by Section 60 (2) of the Local Government Act 1972, we have carefully considered all the representations made to us at each stage of the review. The following paragraphs explain how we arrived at our final proposals. THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN ROTHERHAM AND DONCASTER Mexborough Curve Draft Proposal 12. Rotherham suggested amending the boundary in the vicinity of the Mexborough Curve and Junction so as to unite in Doncaster the Whitelea Industrial Estate which is divided by the present boundary and accessible only from Doncaster. Rotherham suggested that a realignment using the centre of the Mexborough Curve railway line would provide an identifiable boundary. 13. We agreed that it would be sensible to unite the Whitelea Industrial Estate in Doncaster but concluded that a better boundary would be to use the eastern embankment of the railway line, thus retaining British Rail property within one local authority. 14. We decided, therefore, to adopt Rotherham1s suggestion as the basis of our draft proposal but to use the eastern embankment of the Mexborough Curve. Final Proposal 15. Doncaster supported our draft proposal and Rotherham raised no objections. We received no other representations and have decided to confirm our draft proposal as final. Fox Well to Hill Top; Old Denaby Draft Proposal 16. Rotherham suggested realigning the boundary in the vicinity of Old Denaby. It pointed out that the existing boundary was no longer identifiable, as a result of ploughing, and suggested using footpaths and field boundaries to provide a more readily identifiable boundary. Rotherham also suggested realigning the currently defaced boundary at Fox Well so as to unite that property and its grounds in Doncaster. 17. We agreed that Rotherham's suggestion would provide a more easily identifiable boundary and decided to adopt it as our draft proposal. Final Proposal 18. Doncaster and Rotherham supported our draft proposal. We received no other representations and have decided to confirm it as final. i Firsby Lane, Hill Top i Draft Proposal 19. Rotherham suggested realigning the boundary to Firsby Lane since the current boundary was no longer identifiable, as a result of ploughing, and was also defaced in the area of the abandoned quarry workings. i 20. We noted that the current boundary split the property of Toll Bar House at Hill Top and that Rotherham's suggestion would unite the property in Rotherham, although separating it from the village of Hill Top which is in Doncaster. 21 . We agreed that Rotherham's suggestion would provide a better boundary in the area but saw no benefit in separating Toll Bar House from the rest of the community at Hill Top. We therefore decided to adopt Rotherham's suggestion as the basis of our draft proposal but to use the western side of Firsby Lane so as to unite Toll Bar House in Doncaster. Final Proposal 22. Doncaster and Rotherham supported our draft proposal. Rotherham, however, suggested realigning the boundary down the west side of Firsby Lane to Firsby Reservoir Cottage so that Doncaster would be wholly responsible for highway maintenance of the lane. Ravenfield Residents' Association also supported the draft proposal but submitted an alternative suggestion for the electoral consequences. Conisborough Parks Parish Council opposed the proposal saying that it considered the existing boundary to be satisfactory. 23. We considered that, whilst Rotherham1s suggestion would consolidate the highway maintenance responsibilities for Firsby Lane in Doncaster, all the properties to the south of the Lane would be located in Rotherham, and it seemed unreasonable to require Doncaster to maintain the access to them. We also considered the Residents' Association's suggestion, but noted that there had been no objection to the electoral consequential from either Rotherham or Doncaster. We have therefore decided to confirm our draft proposal as final. Braithwell Common to Scotch Spring Lane Draft Proposal 24. Rotherham suggested a major realignment in this area to provide a clear and identifiable boundary and proposed the transfer of Braithwell Common and Scotch Spring Lane to its authority. Doncaster suggested two minor realignments, at Hellaby Lane and at Fish Pond Lane, to simplify highway maintenance. 25. We noted that Doncaster's suggestion would leave the hamlet of Silverthorpe in Doncaster but we agreed with Rotherham that the hamlet seemed to have a stronger affinity with Ravenfield in Rotherham than with Doncaster. We also considered the suggestion lin respect of Fish Pond Lane and Stainton Lane but noted that Doncaster's suggestion did not follow Stainton Lane throughout its length. .26. We considered that Rotherham's suggestion would provide'a i clearer and more readily identifiable boundary and decided, therefore, to adopt it as our draft proposal. Final Proposal 27. We received a large response to the draft proposal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 53 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    53 bus time schedule & line map 53 She∆eld - Clowne - Mansƒeld View In Website Mode The 53 bus line (She∆eld - Clowne - Mansƒeld) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Clowne <-> Mansƒeld: 7:15 AM (2) Mansƒeld <-> She∆eld Centre: 6:40 AM - 3:50 PM (3) She∆eld Centre <-> Mansƒeld: 8:30 AM - 5:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 53 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 53 bus arriving. Direction: Clowne <-> Mansƒeld 53 bus Time Schedule 53 stops Clowne <-> Mansƒeld Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:15 AM Tesco, Clowne Tuesday 7:15 AM Miners Welfare, Clowne Mill Street, Clowne Wednesday 7:15 AM Angel Inn, Clowne Thursday 7:15 AM Friday 7:15 AM Wayside House, Clowne Saturday Not Operational Romeley Lane, Stanfree Appletree Inn, Stanfree Mill Lane, Stanfree 53 bus Info Direction: Clowne <-> Mansƒeld Oxcroft Miners Welfare, Stanfree Stops: 53 Trip Duration: 50 min Hollow Farm, Shuttlewood Line Summary: Tesco, Clowne, Miners Welfare, Clowne, Angel Inn, Clowne, Wayside House, Clowne, Romeley Lane, Stanfree, Appletree Inn, Stanfree, Mill Brockley Primary School, Shuttlewood Lane, Stanfree, Oxcroft Miners Welfare, Stanfree, Hollow Farm, Shuttlewood, Brockley Primary School, Vivian Street, Shuttlewood Shuttlewood, Vivian Street, Shuttlewood, Wyandotte Vivian Street, Shuttlewood Farm, Shuttlewood, Masons Cottages, Shuttlewood, Lodge Farm, Bolsover, Mill Lane, Bolsover, New Wyandotte Farm, Shuttlewood Street, Bolsover, Hides Green, Bolsover, Market Place, Bolsover,
    [Show full text]
  • 978–1–137–49934–9 Copyrighted Material – 978–1–137–49934–9
    Copyrighted material – 978–1–137–49934–9 © Steve Ely 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–1–137–49934–9 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement
    1 Introduction The Neighbourhood Plan steering group has been committed in undertaking consistent, transparent, effective and inclusive periods of community consultation throughout the development of the Neighbourhood Plan (NP) and associated evidence base. The Neighbourhood Plan Regulations require that, when a Neighbourhood Development Plan is submitted for examination, a statement should also be submitted setting out details of those consulted, how they were consulted, the main issues and concerns raised and how these have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed Plan. Legal Basis: Section 15(2) of part 5 of the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations (as amended) 2012 sets out that, a consultation statement should be a document containing the following: • Details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed Neighbourhood Development Plan; • Explanation of how they were consulted; • Summary of the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; and • Description of how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed NP. The NP for Hodsock/ Langold will cover the period 2019 until 2037. The NP proposal does not deal with county matters (mineral extraction and waste development), nationally significant infrastructure or any other matters set out in Section 61K of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Our Consultation Statement This statement outlines the stages in which have led to the production of the Hodsock/Langold NP in terms of consultation with residents, businesses in the parish, stakeholders and statutory consultees. In addition, this statement will provide a summary and, in some cases, detailed descriptions of the numerous consultation events and other ways in which residents and stakeholders were able to influence the content of the Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas, Andrew 4 Capelrig Gardens Apt 212 Glasgow, Scotland G776nf United Kingdom 568835 Ontario Ltd 188 Brownridge
    DOUGLAS, ANDREW 568835 ONTARIO LTD ALTA INVESTMENTS INC 4 CAPELRIG GARDENS APT 212 188 BROWNRIDGE DRIVE 21-190 MARYCROFT AVE GLASGOW, SCOTLAND THORNHILL, ON CANADA WOODBRIDGE, ON CANADA G776NF UNITED KINGDOM L4J 7E4 L4L 5Y2 CARDOM INVESTMENT PRTNRSHP CHIONS CONSTRUCTION CORP DIBIASE AGGLOMERATED HOLD CORP 1 MUZICH PLACE 185 SNOW BLVD 3979 TESTON SIDE ROAD VAUGHAN, ON CANADA CONCORD, ON CANADA WOODBRIDGE, ON CANADA L4L 9C5 L4K 4N9 L4L 8L2 DR DAVID CHAUT KHUON C P INC EDGE, RAYMOND & JOYCE JULL, HOMA 2382 LE RUISSEAU CIR 1815 YONGE STREET #414 109 HEATH ST W ORLEANS, ON CANADA TORONTO, ON CANADA TORONTO, ON CANADA K1W 1K8 M4T 2A4 M4V 1T5 MINA, CHRYSSOULA TANG FLORIDA LAND TRUST MARTIN, DORIS; JEAN PAUL MONGRAIN 230 JOHNSTON AVE 5 PARK HOME AVE #170 219 FT YORK BLVD #3509 TORONTO, ON CANADA TORONTO, ON CANADA TORONTO, ON CANADA M2N 1H3 M2N 6L4 M5V 1B1 MALATESTA, FRANK DELAFUENTE GALDO ET AL, ALVARO HORNER, ANDREW; EMINE E TOZ 555 WILLAM GRAHAM DRIVE SUITE 334 JACQUES CAZOTTE 5721 71 NORFOLK AVE AURORA, ON CANADA VITACURA SANTIAGO, CHILE LONDON, ENGLAND L4G 3H9 N136AP UNITED KINGDOM SEEKINS, MARK & LOUISA SCHARFENBERGER, MICHAEL PAMELA F PENMAN REV TRUST 4 FIRBECK BINGLEY WALDSTRASSE 7B UNDERBACHSTRASSE 22 WEST YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND WOERTHSEE, GERMANY WALCHWIL, SWITZERLAND BD1 6LP UNITED KINGDOM 82237 6318 KESSLER, PROF DR OLIVER TUCKER, JACK M & CATHY G DEAN E DIMICHELE TRUST ALLMENDSTR. 4B 5192 STONEHAVEN DRIVE 6700 AUSTIN BAY COURT UITIKON, SWITZERLAND BIRMINGHAM, AL N LITTLE ROCK, AR CH 8142 35244 72120 GUSTAFSON, PAULA L ALEX CLAWSON CASTORI
    [Show full text]
  • Mattersey Informatino Statement
    Mattersey Neighbourhood Plan Referendum Information Statement A Referendum relating to the adoption of the Mattersey Neighbourhood Plan will be held on 5th September 2019. The question that will be asked in the Referendum is: “Do you want Bassetlaw District Council to use the Neighbourhood Plan for Mattersey to help it decide planning applications in the neighbourhood area?” The Referendum area is identified on the map which is included with the Decision Statement. The Referendum area is identical to the area which has been designated as the Mattersey Neighbourhood Area. A person is entitled to vote in the Referendum if on 5th September 2019: he or she is entitled to vote in a local government election in the Referendum area; and his or her qualifying address for the election is in the Referendum area. A person’s qualifying address is, in relation to a person registered in the register of electors, the address in respect of which he or she is entitled to be registered. The Referendum expenses limit that will apply in relation to the Referendum is £2,395.57 The number of persons entitled to vote in the Referendum by reference to which that limit has been calculated is 569. A copy of the specified documents, that is those documents listed below, may be inspected on line: www.bassetlaw.gov.uk/mattersey-np Paper copies of the specified documents are also available to view at: Queen’s Buildings, Potter Street, Worksop, Notts. S80 2AH, Monday – Friday between the hours of 9.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality and Diversity Strategy 2021
    Equality and Diversity Strategy 2021 - 2025 2 www.bassetlaw.gov.uk Contents 4 | 1. Foreword 5 | 2. Our Equality Duties 6 | 3. Our Objectives 2020-2024 9 | 4. Our Workforce 12 | Appendix – Bassetlaw Demographic Profile 01909 533 533 3 1. Foreword As a Council, we have a duty to produce a Single Equality Scheme and this Strategy forms our next Scheme for 2021-2025, guiding our approach to increasing opportunities across the District and improving access to Council services. Bassetlaw District Council’s Equality & Diversity Strategy 2021-2025 builds on the foundations of our previous strategy to ensure that equality is further embedded into our policies, procedures and every- day working, and that we embrace diversity and recognise that everyone has their own unique needs, characteristics, skills, and abilities. The year 2020 was an exceptionally challenging year for all of us. The Covid-19 pandemic meant that the Council needed to provide extra support to the most vulnerable in society and find new ways to deliver its services. The next four years will be a critical period for the Council and its partners in ensuring Bassetlaw’s economy can bounce back from the impacts of Covid-19 and Brexit, and that residents and businesses can continue to be supported effectively. The Strategy is the next step in a journey to better understand our communities and anticipate the needs of residents and service users. The Strategy identifies five key objectives for the next four years, and the actions we will take to deliver each of these. The objectives have been identified through our ongoing conversations with residents, and analysing the latest data both internally and externally.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications List
    Doncaster & District Family History Society Publications List August 2020 Parishes & Townships in the Archdeaconry of Doncaster in 1914 Notes The Anglican Diocese of Sheffield was formed in 1914 and is divided into two Archdeaconries. The map shows the Parishes within the Archdeaconry of Doncaster at that time. This publication list shows Parishes and other Collections that Doncaster & District Family History Society has transcribed and published in the form of Portable Document Files (pdf). Downloads Each Parish file etc with a reference number can be downloaded from the Internet using: www.genfair.co.uk (look for the Society under suppliers) at a cost of £6 each. Postal Sales The files can also be supplied by post on a USB memory stick. The cost is £10 each. The price includes the memory stick, one file and postage & packing. (The memory stick can be reused once you have loaded the files onto your own computer). Orders and payment by cheque through: D&DFHS Postal Sales, 18 Newbury Way, Cusworth, Doncaster, DN5 8PY Additional files at £6 each can be included on a single USB memory stick (up to a total of 4 files depending on file sizes). Example: One USB memory stick with “Adlingfleet” Parish file Ref: 1091 = £10. 1st Additional file at £6: the above plus “Adwick le Street” Ref: 1112 = Total £16. 2nd Additional file at £6: “The Poor & the Law” Ref: 1125 = Total £22 Postage included. We can also arrange payment by BACs, but for card and non-sterling purchases use Genfair While our limited stocks last we will also supply files in the form of a CD at £6 each plus postage.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals Nhs Trust
    Register of Governors’ Interests as 11th February 2021 The current details of Governors’ Interests held by the Trust are as set out below. Governors are requested to note the contents of the register – for confirmation at each Council Meeting, and to declare any amendments as appropriate in order to keep the register up to date. Peter Abell – Public Governor – Bassetlaw Member of The Labour Party Member of Community Union Dennis Atkin – Public Governor – Doncaster Director/Owner of The Ridge Employability College Ltd Member of the Doncaster Health Ambassadors Group (Doncaster Healthwatch) Doncaster NHS Clinical Commissioning Group(Equality Engagement Committee) Member of the Great North Medical Centre, GP Patients Forum Mike Addenbrooke, Public Governor Parish Councillor, Braithwell with Micklebring Parish Council Wendy Baird, Partner Governor Employee of The University of Sheffield – Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health – Role as Faculty Director of Research and Innovation Ann-Louise Bayley, Public Governor Unite Union, Secretary Delegate, North East Region of UNITE Union to the National Forum Board Doncaster Trades Council South Yorkshire TUC Yorkshire Humberside and N.E TUC Stand Up To Racism – Chair Affiliated to the Labour Party Member of YWT Philip Beavers, Public Governor Retired Judge – The Family Court Supplemental Magistrate (past Chairman of the Doncaster Bench) Independent Person under the Localism Act 2011 for Doncaster MBC and Rotherham MBC, regarding Standards in Public Life Member of the High Sheriff’s Advisory Committee for South Yorkshire Independent Person under the Local Authorities (Standing Orders) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 for Doncaster MBC and Rotherham MBC. relating to designated Senior Officers of the Authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • 81 82 Valid From: 29 August 2021
    Bus service(s) 81 82 Valid from: 29 August 2021 Areas served Places on the route Doncaster Doncaster Frenchgate Wheatley Interchange Intake Doncaster Royal Infirmary Armthorpe (West Moor Park) What’s changed Timetable changes. Daytime on Mondays to Fridays buses will run every 15 minutes. Operator(s) How can I get more information? TravelSouthYorkshire @TSYalerts 01709 51 51 51 Bus route map for services 81 and 82 01/04/2016# Edenthorpe Arksey Wheatley Park Ind Est Armthorpe, Armthorpe, Briar Rd/Elm Rd Church St/ Mill St Bentley 81Ô, 82 Ñ Armthorpe, Doncaster Rd/Charles Cres Wheatley Hills Armthorpe, 81 Yorkshire Way/ Lincolnshire Way Armthorpe 82 Wheatley 81 Armthorpe, Church St/Winholme Wheatley, Armthorpe Rd/ Intake, Armthorpe Rd/ Doncaster Royal Infirmary Danum Sch 81Ó, 82 Ò Intake, Armthorpe Rd/Oakhill Rd 81Ò, 82Ó Doncaster, Frenchgate Interchange Wheatley, Thorne Rd/ Intake Doncaster Royal Infirmary Armthorpe, Parkway/Nutwell Ln Doncaster, Thorne Rd/ Christ Church Rd Town Moor 81 82 Bennetthorpe database right 2016 and yright p o c Cantley own r C Hyde Park Belle Vue data © y e v Sur e c dnan r O Bessacarr ontains C 6 = Terminus point = Public transport = Shopping area = Bus route & stops = Rail line & station = Tram route & stop Stopping points for service 81 Doncaster, Frenchgate Interchange Cleveland Street Hall Gate Thorne Road Town Moor Wheatley Armthorpe Road Intake Armthorpe Road Armthorpe Doncaster Road Church Street Mill Street Hatfi eld Lane Mercel Avenue Durham Lane Yorkshire Way Wickett Hern Road Nutwell
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates Yorkshire Region
    Page | 1 LIBERAL/LIBERAL DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES IN THE YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE REGION 1945-2015 Constituencies in the county of Yorkshire (excluding Cleveland and Teesside) INCLUDING SDP CANDIDATES in the GENERAL ELECTIONS of 1983 and 1987 PREFACE A number of difficulties have been encountered in compiling this Index which have not been resolved in an entirely satisfactory manner. Local government boundary changes in the early 1970s led to the creation of the Cleveland and HuMberside Counties. Cleveland and adjacent constituencies have been included in the Index for the North East Region. HuMberside constituencies coMMencing with the General Election of February 1974 are included in the Yorkshire Region. The region has been home to an impressive gallery of party personalities, several of whoM receive extended entries. The spirited independence with respect to LPO HQ in London which the Yorkshire Regional Party has often shown, and the relatively strong direction it has exerted over its constituency associations, would account for the formidable challenge maintained in the Region at successive general elections, even in the direst years of party fortunes. Yorkshire appears to have been rather less willing in 1950 to heed to the dictates of the Martell Plan (see article below) than other regions. Even so, until the 1970s there were several Labour-held Mining and industrial constituencies where the Party declined to fight. InforMation on Many candidates reMains sparse. SDP candidates particularly, over 1983-87, seem to have been an anonyMous battalion indeed, few if any of them leaving a Mark on any field of huMan endeavour. 1 Page | 2 THE MARTELL PLAN The Martell Plan, mentioned in passing throughout the regional directories was the electoral strategy adopted by the Liberal Party for the General Election of 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • 1840 Barnsley - Staincross - Barnsley 1900 Barnsley - Staincross - New Lodge
    Service 1: 1840 Barnsley - Staincross - Barnsley 1900 Barnsley - Staincross - New Lodge Service 6: 1845 Barnsley - Kendray - Barnsley Service 8: 1811 Rotherham - Upper Haugh - Rotherham Service 8a: 1841 Rotherham - Upper Haugh - Rotherham Service 9: 1830 Rotherham - Sandhill - Rotherham 1910 Rotherham - Sandhill - Rawmarsh Service 11: 1830 Barnsley - Athersley North - Barnsley Service 12: 1835 Barnsley - Athersley South - Barnsley 1905 Barnsley - Athersley South -Carlton Rd Bottom Service 21a: 1810 Barnsley - Millhouse Green 1806 Millhouse Green - Barnsley Service 22x: 1820 Rotherham - Barnsley 1835 Barnsley - Rotherham Service 27: 1843 Barnsley - Wombwell 1830 Wombwell - Barnsley Service 27a: 1823 Barnsley - Grimethorpe 1900 Grimethorpe - Barnsley Service 28: 1705 Barnsley - Pontefract Service 28c: 1835 Pontefract - Barnsley 1803 Barnsley - Hemsworth Service 43: 1910 Barnsley - Pogmoor - Barnsley Service 44: 1839 Barnsley - Kingstone - Barnsley Service 57: 1840 Barnsley - Royston,Meadstead Drive 1820 Royston,Meadstead Drive - Barnsley Service 59: 1715 Barnsley - Wakefield 1820 Wakefield - Barnsley Service 66: 1835 Barnsley - Hoyland - Elsecar - Barnsley Service 67: 1810 Barnsley - Jump - Wombwell 1830 Wombwell - Jump - Barnsley Service 67a: 1707 Barnsley - Pilley - Wombwell 1720 Wombwell - Pilley - Barnsley Service 67c: 1637 Barnsley - Tankersley - Wombwell 1650 Wombwell - Tankersley - Barnsley Service 93: 1815 Barnsley - Woolley Grange 1842 Woolley Grange - Barnsley Service 94a: 1900 Barnsley - Cawthorne 1825 Cawthorne - Barnsley Service
    [Show full text]