DOCSLIB.ORG

The Incidence of Parasitism by Conopid and Phorid Flies and Its Effects on the Behavior of Bumble Bees(Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Incidence of Parasitism by Conopid and Phorid Flies and Its Effects on the Behavior of Bumble Bees(Hymenoptera: Apidae) University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Legacy Theses 2001 The incidence of parasitism by conopid and phorid flies and its effects on the behavior of bumble bees(Hymenoptera: Apidae) Otterstatter, Michael C. Otterstatter, M. C. (2001). The incidence of parasitism by conopid and phorid flies and its effects on the behavior of bumble bees(Hymenoptera: Apidae) (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/18191 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/40970 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca The author of this thesis has granted the University of Calgary a non-exclusive license to reproduce and distribute copies of this thesis to users of the University of Calgary Archives. Copyright remains with the author. Theses and dissertations available in the University of Calgary Institutional Repository are solely for the purpose of private study and research. They may not be copied or reproduced, except as permitted by copyright laws, without written authority of the copyright owner. Any commercial use or publication is strictly prohibited. The original Partial Copyright License attesting to these terms and signed by the author of this thesis may be found in the original print version of the thesis, held by the University of Calgary Archives. The thesis approval page signed by the examining committee may also be found in the original print version of the thesis held in the University of Calgary Archives. Please contact the University of Calgary Archives for further information, E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: (403) 220-7271 Website: http://www.ucalgary.ca/archives/ UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY The Incidence of Parasitism by Conopid and Phorid Flies and its Effects on the Behaviour of Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) by Michael C. Otterstatter A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA JUNE, 2001 © Michael C. Otterstatter 2001 ABSTRACT Phorid and conopid flies parasitize bumble bees (Bombus spp.) in southwestern Alberta. Conopids parasitized bees at several sites, whereas phorids parasitized bumble bees extensively only at Barrier Lake. The prevalence of phorids and conopids differed among bumble-bee species and sexes. Although phorids and conopids may increase their reproductive success by parasitizing relatively large bees through more (phorid) or larger (conopids) offspring, large bees were rare at my study site. Nevertheless, conopids tended to parasitize large bees and thereby achieved heavier offspring. In contrast, phorids achieved relatively large offspring on small bees when few larvae developed per bee. The lifespan of bumble bees in the laboratory was reduced considerably by phorid parasitism, but less so by conopid parasitism, and similar results are expected among bees in the field. Conopid parasitism affected the incidence of pollen collection by bees, but neither phorid nor conopid parasitism affected the species of pollen that bees collected. iii ACKOWLEDGEMENTS Many people helped me complete this thesis and I am very grateful for their contributions. My examining committee, Rob Longair, Gordon Pritchard and Ralph Cartar provided thoughtful comments on this thesis. The students of Lawrence Harder's lab, Crispin Jordan, Eric Gross, Taline Sarkissian, Jannice Friedman and Chris Borkent made my M.Sc. experience an enjoyable one. Crispin Jordan provided many interesting and humorous discussions and jamming time for which I am very grateful. Corey Corbett helped me considerably with collecting and processing bumble bees. Judy Buchanan-Mappin provided me with weather data from the University of Calgary field station in Kananaskis. Brian Brown identified my phorid flies and helped with ideas and discussions pertaining to phorid parasitism of bumble bees. Troy Whidden helped with interesting discussions and introduced me to bumble-bee collecting and rearing. Lawrence Harder and Robin Owen were especially helpful throughout my M.Sc. Lawrence went far beyond his obligations as co-supervisor and provided help with every aspect of this thesis. His guidance and support help me enormously and I am extremely grateful. Robin turned me on to how interesting and enjoyable bumble bees can be to work with and encouraged me to pursue graduate studies. He provided me with encouragement and financial support and was an excellent supervisor. Nora Saona was especially supportive and provided encouragement, warmth, food and all the things necessary to make me happy. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE APPROVAL PAGE ii ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES x 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Parasitoids of social insects 1 1.2 Parasitoids of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) 3 1.3 Objectives 10 2 General methods 12 2.1 Study site 12 2.2 Collecting bumble bees 12 3 Ecology and distribution of diptera parasitoids of bumble bees in SW Alberta 15 3.1 Introduction 15 3.2 Methods 18 3.2.1 Study sites 18 3.2.2 Statistical analyses 19 3.3 Natural history 19 3.3.1 Apocephalus borealis 19 v 3.3.2 Conopid parasitoids of bumble bees 21 3.4 Results 23 3.4.1 Phorid parasitism of bumble bees in southwestern Alberta 28 3.4.2 Conopid parasitism of bumble bees in southwestern Alberta 28 3.5 Discussion 28 4 Host selection by phorid and conopid parasitoids of bumble bees 33 4.1 Introduction 33 4.2 Methods 35 4.2.1 Capture of adult parasitoids 35 4.2.2 Statistical analyses 36 4.3 Results 39 4.3.1 Phorid parasitism of bumble bees 42 4.3.2 Conopid Parasitism of Bumble Bees 68 4.4 Discussion 79 4.4.1 Phorid parasitism of bumble bees 79 4.4.2 Conopid parasitism of bumble bees 87 4.4.3 Host use by phorid and conopid parasitoids of bumble bees 90 5 Effects of dipteran parasitism on bumble-bee survival and behaviour 91 5.1 Introduction 91 5.2 Methods 93 5.2.1 Collecting methods 93 5.2.2 Pollen load analysis 93 vi 5.2.1 Collecting methods 93 5.2.2 Pollen load analysis 93 5.2.3 Statistical analyses 94 5.3 Results 96 5.3.1 Effects of parasitism on bumble-bee survival 96 5.3.2 Effects of parasitism on pollen collection by worker bumble bees... 102 5.4 Discussion 112 5.4.1 Effects of parasitism on bumble-bee survival 112 5.4.2 Effects of parasitism on pollen collection by worker bumble bees... 117 6 Conclusions 121 7 Literature Cited 124 vii LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE 1.1 Dipteran and hymenopteran parasitoids of bumble bees 4 3.1 Parasitism of bumble bees by phorid and conopid flies in SW Alberta 24 4.1 Statistics describing the effects of bumble-bee species, sex and year on the probabilities of phorid and conopid parasitism 45 4.2 ANOVA results for comparison of bumble-bee mass between phorid parasitized and unparasitized bees during 1999 and 2000 46 4.3 Capture of adult A. borealis by sticky traps on different plant species 55 4.4 Analysis of phorid clutch size, pupal mass, larval survivorship and brood sex ratio during 1999 and 2000 56 4.5 Characteristics of phorid clutches on different bumble-bee species 60 4.6 ANOVA results for comparison of bumble-bee mass between conopid parasitized and unparasitized bees during 1999 and 2000 71 4.7 Analysis of the survival of conopid larvae and conopid pupal mass 80 5.1 Statistics comparing the survival of parasitized and unparasitized bumble bees 99 5.2 Statistics describing the effects of residual lifespan, bumble-bee species, month and year on the proportion of unparasitized workers collecting pollen. 108 5.3 Statistics describing the effects of parasitism, residual lifespan, bumble-bee species and year on the proportion of workers collecting pollen 109 5.4 Simpson's Diversity Index for pollen loads from parasitized and unparasitized worker bumble bees 110 5.5 Proportion of pollen of the same species as the plant on which bees were collected for pollen loads from parasitized and unparasitized workers Ill ix LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE PAGE 3.1 Distribution of phorid and conopid parasitism of bumble bees in SW Alberta..27 4.1 Seasonal a) prevalence of phorid and conopid parasitoids in bumble bees, and b) abundance of bumble-bee species during 1999 and 2000 41 4.2 Incidence of phorid and conopid parasitism among a) bumble-bee species during 1999 and b) during 2000, and c) among bumble-bee sexes 44 4.3 Mass of phorid parasitized and unparasitized bumble bees 48 4.4 Incidence of phorid parasitism among pollen- and nectar-collecting workers. .50 4.5 Incidence of phorid parasitism among bumble bees collected on different plants for a) all bee species pooled, and b) two representative bee species.. ..53 4.6 Relation of phorid clutch size to host mass during 1999 and 2000 58 4.7 Relation of total mass of phorid pupae per bee to a) clutch size during 1999 and b) during 2000, and c) to host mass during 1999 and d) during 2000...62 4.8 Relation of mean mass of phorid pupae per bee to host mass 65 4.9 Relation of mean proportion of phorid larvae per bee that survived to pupation to clutch size during 1999 and 2000 67 4.10 Mass of conopid parasitized and unparasitized bumble bees 73 4.11 a) Relation of conopid pupal mass to host
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Diversity Effects on Plant-Pollinator Interactions in Urban and Agricultural Settings
    Research Collection Doctoral Thesis Plant diversity effects on plant-pollinator interactions in urban and agricultural settings Author(s): Hennig, Ernest Ireneusz Publication Date: 2011 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006689739 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library Diss. ETH No. 19624 Plant Diversity Effects on Plant-Pollinator Interactions in Urban and Agricultural Settings A dissertation submitted to the ETH ZURICH¨ for the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES presented by ERNEST IRENEUSZ HENNIG Degree in Environmental Science (Comparable to Msc (Master of Science)) University Duisburg-Essen born 09th February 1977 in Swiebodzice´ (Poland) accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Jaboury Ghazoul, examiner Prof. Dr. Felix Kienast, co-examiner Dr. Simon Leather, co-examiner Prof. Dr. Alex Widmer, co-examiner 2011 You can never make a horse out of a donkey my father Andrzej Zbigniew Hennig Young Man Intrigued by the Flight of a Non-Euclidian Fly (Max Ernst, 1944) Contents Abstract Zusammenfassung 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Competition and facilitation in plant-plant interactions for pollinator services .9 1.2 Pollination in the urban environment . 11 1.3 Objectives . 12 1.4 References . 12 2 Does plant diversity enhance pollinator facilitation? An experimental approach 19 2.1 Introduction . 20 2.2 Materials & Methods . 21 2.2.1 Study Design . 21 2.2.2 Data Collection . 22 2.2.3 Analysis . 22 2.3 Results . 23 2.3.1 Pollinator Species and Visits .
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk
    Dumfries & Galloway Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk. Keith is a former Dumfries & Galloway Council ranger and now helps to run Nocturnal Wildlife Tours based in Castle Douglas. The tours use a specially prepared night tours vehicle, complete with external mounted thermal camera and internal viewing screens. Each participant also has their own state- of-the-art thermal imaging device to use for the duration of the tour. This allows participants to detect animals as small as rabbits at up to 300 metres away or get close enough to see Badgers and Roe Deer going about their nightly routine without them knowing you’re there. For further information visit www.wildlifetours.co.uk email [email protected] or telephone 07483 131791 Contributing photographers p2 Small White butterfly © Ian Findlay, p4 Colvend coast ©Mark Pollitt, p5 Bittersweet © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Wildflower grassland ©Mark Pollitt, p6 Oblong Woodsia planting © National Trust for Scotland, Oblong Woodsia © Chris Miles, p8 Birdwatching © castigatio/Shutterstock, p9 Hedgehog in grass © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Hedgehog in leaves © Mark Bridger/Shutterstock, Hedgehog dropping © northeastwildlife.co.uk, p10 Cetacean watch at Mull of Galloway © DGERC, p11 Common Carder Bee © Bob Fitzsimmons, p12 Black Grouse confrontation © Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, p13 Black Grouse male ©Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, Female Black Grouse in flight © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Common Pipistrelle bat © Steven Farhall/ Shutterstock, p14 White Ermine © Mark Pollitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Bees
    Scottish Bees Introduction to bees Bees are fascinating insects that can be found in a broad range of habitats from urban gardens to grasslands and wetlands. There are over 270 species of bee in the UK in 6 families - 115 of these have been recorded in Scotland, with 4 species now thought to be extinct and insufficient data available for another 2 species. Bees are very diverse, varying in size, tongue-length and flower preference. In the UK we have 1 species of honey bee, 24 species of bumblebee and the rest are solitary bees. They fulfil an essential ecological and environmental role as one of the most significant groups of pollinating insects, all of which we depend upon for the pollination of 80% of our wild and cultivated plants. Some flowers are in fact designed specifically for bee pollination, to the exclusion of generalist pollinators. Bees and their relatives Bees are classified in the complex insect order Hymenoptera (meaning membrane-winged), which also includes many kinds of parasitic wasps, gall wasps, hunting wasps, ants and sawflies. There are about 150,000 species of Hymenoptera known worldwide separated into two sub-orders. The first is the most primitive sub-order Symphyta which includes the sawflies and their relatives, lacking a wasp-waist and generally with free-living caterpillar-like larvae. The second is the sub-order Apocrita, which includes the ants, bees and wasps which are ’wasp-waisted’ and have grub-like larvae that develop within hosts, galls or nests. The sub-order Apocrita is in turn divided into two sections, the Parasitica and Aculeata.
    [Show full text]
  • Station-News-July-2021.Pdf
    Station News The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Volume 11 Issue 6 July 2021 This Issue The mission of The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station is to de- Grants Received 2 velop, advance, and disseminate scientific knowledge, improve agricultur- al productivity and environmental quality, protect plants, and enhance Administration 2 human health and well-being through research for the benefit of Connecti- cut residents and the nation. Seeking solutions across a variety of disci- Analytical Chemistry 3 plines for the benefit of urban, suburban, and rural communities, Station Entomology 3 scientists remain committed to "Putting Science to Work for Society", a motto as relevant today as it was at our founding in 1875. Environmental Sciences 4 Forestry and Horticulture 5 Plant Pathology and Ecology 6 Valley Laboratory 7 Dept. Research Updates 7 Journal Articles Approved 14 STATION NEWS STATION New Staff, Students, and 15 The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station | Station News | VolumeVolunteers 11 Issue 6 | July 2021 1 GRANTS RECEIVED JUNE 2021 DR. CAROLE CHEAH received a grant (June 23) from the Farmington River Coordi- nating Committee ($10,000) for a 2021-2022 project entitled “Augmentative biolog- ical control of hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) as a strategy to mitigate eastern hemlock decline from HWA outbreaks in the upper Farmington River watershed.” The FRCC grant supported June S. tsugae releases in the People’s State Forest and the American Legion State Forest in Barkhamsted. ADMINISTRATION DR. JASON C. WHITE,
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List
    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
    [Show full text]
  • Conopid Recording Scheme Newsletter 6
    .. Conopid Recording Scheme [NCDRPORAT[NG 1HE LONatOPTEIUDA£ STIJDY GROUP Newsletter No.6 June 1995 Further disruption during 1994/95 continues to keep me fully occupied. A change of employers has meant a return to Cardiff after an absence of more than 10 years, with all the upheaval that entails. A house-move and change of address will occur in the near future (I hope!), but in the meantime all correspondence should continue to be sent to my Cirencester address. The bulk of this newsletter comprises a set of draft keys to the British fauna, prepared originally for the conopid and larger Brachycera identification workshop at Preston Montford earlier this year, and incorporating useful comments arising at that time. These keys include reference to the more likely of the potential additional species from the European fauna, many of which are very simiJar to recognised British species. I have not attempted to include these within the keys, but have instead given details of 'alert characteristics' which, if noticed, should serve to mark out the specimen concerned as needing further investigation as a poss~ble addition. Many of the potential additions are very widespread in Europe, but would almost certainly be overlooked by recorders relying on current British keys. Any comments on the success or failings of these keys would be gratefully received, as would sight of any specimens which don't fit, or which exhibit any of the noted 'alert characteristics•. All recorders are urged especially to be on the look out for Conops vitellinus, which looks very much like our C quadrifsciatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Bee Viruses: Routes of Infection in Hymenoptera
    fmicb-11-00943 May 27, 2020 Time: 14:39 # 1 REVIEW published: 28 May 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00943 Bee Viruses: Routes of Infection in Hymenoptera Orlando Yañez1,2*, Niels Piot3, Anne Dalmon4, Joachim R. de Miranda5, Panuwan Chantawannakul6,7, Delphine Panziera8,9, Esmaeil Amiri10,11, Guy Smagghe3, Declan Schroeder12,13 and Nor Chejanovsky14* 1 Institute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2 Agroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland, 3 Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 4 INRAE, Unité de Recherche Abeilles et Environnement, Avignon, France, 5 Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 6 Environmental Science Research Center, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 7 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 8 General Zoology, Institute for Biology, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany, 9 Halle-Jena-Leipzig, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany, 10 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States, 11 Department Edited by: of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States, 12 Department of Veterinary Akio Adachi, Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States,
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Sarah A. Maxfield-Taylor for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology presented on March 26, 2014. Title: Natural Enemies of Native Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Western Oregon Abstract approved: _____________________________________________ Sujaya U. Rao Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) are important native pollinators in wild and agricultural systems, and are one of the few groups of native bees commercially bred for use in the pollination of a range of crops. In recent years, declines in bumble bees have been reported globally. One factor implicated in these declines, believed to affect bumble bee colonies in the wild and during rearing, is natural enemies. A diversity of fungi, protozoa, nematodes, and parasitoids has been reported to affect bumble bees, to varying extents, in different parts of the world. In contrast to reports of decline elsewhere, bumble bees have been thriving in Oregon on the West Coast of the U.S.A.. In particular, the agriculturally rich Willamette Valley in the western part of the state appears to be fostering several species. Little is known, however, about the natural enemies of bumble bees in this region. The objectives of this thesis were to: (1) identify pathogens and parasites in (a) bumble bees from the wild, and (b) bumble bees reared in captivity and (2) examine the effects of disease on bee hosts. Bumble bee queens and workers were collected from diverse locations in the Willamette Valley, in spring and summer. Bombus mixtus, Bombus nevadensis, and Bombus vosnesenskii collected from the wild were dissected and examined for pathogens and parasites, and these organisms were identified using morphological and molecular characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Diagnostic Survey of Pathogens and Parasites of Honey Bees, Apis Mellifera L., from Arkansas and Oklahoma
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2017 A Molecular Diagnostic Survey of Pathogens and Parasites of Honey Bees, Apis mellifera L., From Arkansas and Oklahoma Dylan Cleary University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Recommended Citation Cleary, Dylan, "A Molecular Diagnostic Survey of Pathogens and Parasites of Honey Bees, Apis mellifera L., From Arkansas and Oklahoma" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2554. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2554 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A Molecular Diagnostic Survey of Pathogens and Parasites of Honey Bees, Apis mellifera L., From Arkansas and Oklahoma A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology by Dylan Alexandra Cleary Oklahoma State University Bachelor of Science in Natural Resources, Ecology and Management, 2013 December 2017 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council _____________________________ Allen L. Szalanski, Ph.D Thesis Director _____________________________ _____________________________ Donald Steinkraus, Ph.D Jackie Lee, Ph.D Co-Advisor Committee Member Abstract The health and viability of colonies of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, in the United States have fluctuated dramatically over the past decade. This poses a substantial threat to agricultural production in this country. Currently, no single factor has been identified for this decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera): a Life History, Molecular, Morphological
    The evolutionary biotogy of Conopidae (Diptera): A life history, molecular, morphological, systematic, and taxonomic approach Joel Francis Gibson B.ScHon., University of Guelph, 1999 M.Sc, Iowa State University, 2002 B.Ed., Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2011 Joel Francis Gibson Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de Pedition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your Tile Votre r&ference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these.
    [Show full text]